Category: Sci & Tech

  • Cyberthreat Cases Increased 7 Times During The Second Week Of December

    Cyberthreat Cases Increased 7 Times During The Second Week Of December

    A recently released study using aggregated data from Surfshark Antivirus shows that every 50th scan finds at least one threat. As the festive season shopping is picking up, Surfshark Antivirus reports a rise of 572% in cyberthreats in Kenya in mid-December. Kenya had a threat rate of 16 threats per 100 scan cycle. In the past two months, the most common threats in Kenya have been riskware and SPR.

    “The holiday shopping season leading up to Christmas is not only beneficial for the retailers but cybercriminals too,” – says Nedas Kazlauskas, Antivirus Product Owner at Surfshark. “People searching for gifts and deals online during the period of huge discounts are more likely to click on suspicious links, download malicious files, and infect their devices.”

    Kenya has experienced 572% threat rate increase during the second week of December. The five countries that suffered the highest threat rate spikes during this time (week-over-week) were Italy (166%), Indonesia (187%), U.A.E. (1173%), Romania (430%), and Kenya (572%).

    Europe has been the most affected region over the last couple of months

    Aggregated monthly data from Surfshark Antivirus shows that Kenya is the 2nd country by threat rate in Africa since the start of the monitoring period a month to Black Friday up to mid-December. On average, 4 threats are found per 100 scans in Africa. It is 74% less than the global average. Globally, Europe is the most affected region by cyberthreats (24% more than the global average).

    Most common cyberthreats since mid-October

    The most common threat types identified and flagged during Surfsharks’ Antivirus scans are riskware (45.4% of all threats), heuristic 13.2%), and trojan (8.7%). Since October 17th, the latest weekly global scans show that, on average, 10 RISKWARE threats were found per 100 scans. Some malware (viruses, trojans, worms, etc.) tend to multiply once they’ve infiltrated and infected a device and could cause damage to files, personal data, and operating software. The most likely malware type to be found in bundles is VIRUS. 31% of scans that detect viruses will detect more than 50 of them.

    Two of the most common cyberthreat categories are malware and riskware. Riskware is a program made without malicious intent but has security vulnerabilities that give it the potential to become malware. Malware is any software, product, or program created or installed onto a computer to cause harm.

    Hackers use malware to corrupt or delete files, steal money and personal data, copy passwords, or take control of specific programs. The most common ways for malware to be installed are phishing emails, corrupt attachments, suspicious downloads, unfamiliar links, and malicious websites. Malware comes in various types, such as viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, adware, bots, and more.

     

    Tips to protect yourself from threats online

     

    • Avoid unfamiliar sites: Steer clear of unknown or unvetted sites that offer discounts too good to be true.
    • Look for the lock icon: Make sure the website has a secure HTTPS connection. The lock icon in the address bar can identify them as legitimate sites.
    • Update your software: Ensure the programs and apps are up to date to avoid potential security breaches.
    • Steer clear of suspicious links: Scammers will send malicious links via email, mobile or social. Please do not click on them; instead, verify deals on a retailer’s official website.
    • Watch for typos: Inconsistent grammar, multiple typos, and strange phrases can indicate potential scams.
    • Use Antivirus: It offers real-time protection from same-day threats and advanced detection against malware and cyberattacks.
  • Elon Musk Could Be On His Way Out As Twitter CEO And He Asked For It

    Elon Musk Could Be On His Way Out As Twitter CEO And He Asked For It

    Elon Musk dropped a bombshell on Twitter users Sunday, launching a poll with a loaded question about his future at the social media platform.

    “Should I step down as head of Twitter?” he said in a tweet, asking them to weigh in on whether he should stay at the helm of the company he took over earlier this year in a $44 billion deal.

    “I will abide by the results of this poll, ” he added.

    Musk released the poll after admitting he made a mistake by enacting new restrictions that banned mentions of competing social media websites, including longstanding sites like Meta’s Facebook and Instagram.

    Upstart sites like Mastodon, Truth Social, Tribel, Nostr and Post were also included on Musk’s banned list, according to multiple news outlets, with Twitter users no longer able to link to those “prohibited” platforms.

    Twitter said it would temporarily suspend accounts that include the banned website links in their profile, including spelling out sites like “Instagram -dot- com.”

    However, other mainstream sites such as TikTok, LinkedIn and Parler were not mentioned on the blacklist.

    As of 9 p.m. EST (0200GMT), the poll had generated nearly 8.9 million responses, with the results to be tallied Monday morning.

    Responses were mixed.

    “Vote him out,” said user @crispylopes.

    “Twitter Needs you!” said user @cb_doge.

    Due to the controversy and backlash over the new website restrictions, Musk promised not to make any additional major policy changes until he received the results of the online survey.

    “My apologies. Won’t happen again,” he tweeted shortly before launching his 12-hour poll.

    “As the saying goes, be careful what you wish, as you might get it,” he added.

  • Twitter Files: Secret Blacklists

    Twitter Files: Secret Blacklists

    Twitter built secret blacklists to restrict the visibility and reachability of “disfavored” accounts and tweets, independent journalist Bari Weiss said on Friday, posting part two of the Twitter Files, a set of internal company documents.

    Titling the post “Twitter’s Secret Blacklists,” Weiss, who runs The Free Press, tweeted: “A new #TwitterFiles investigation reveals that teams of Twitter employees build blacklists, prevent disfavored tweets from trending, and actively limit the visibility of entire accounts or even trending topics—all in secret, without informing users.”

    She said Twitter once had a mission “to give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers,” but along the way, barriers were erected.

    Twitter, however, denied that it places accounts on blacklist, she said, adding that in 2018, Vijaya Gadde, then head of legal policy and trust, and Kayvon Beykpour, head of product, said: “We do not shadow ban,” “And we certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.”

    “What many people call ‘shadow banning,’ Twitter executives and employees call ‘Visibility Filtering’ or ‘VF.’,” the journalist who has written for the New York Times and Wall Street Journal, explained, noting that number of “high-level sources” confirmed what the phrase means.

    “’Think about visibility filtering as being a way for us to suppress what people see to different levels. It’s a very powerful tool,’ one senior Twitter employee told us,” she stressed, adding: “’VF’ refers to Twitter’s control over user visibility.”

    “It used VF to block searches of individual users; to limit the scope of a particular tweet’s discoverability; to block select users’ posts from ever appearing on the ‘trending’ page; and from inclusion in hashtag searches,” she said.​​​​​​​

    “We control visibility quite a bit. And we control the amplification of your content quite a bit. And normal people do not know how much we do,’ one Twitter engineer told us,” she underlined, pointing out that two other Twitter employees also confirmed it.

    She said the group that decided whether to limit the reach of certain users was the Strategic Response Team – Global Escalation Team, or SRT-GET, which generally dealt with around 200 “cases” a day.

    Weiss said there was another level beyond that, the ‘Site Integrity Policy, Policy Escalation Support,’ or ‘SIP-PES.’ This “secret group” included Gadde, Global Head of Trust & Safety Yoel Roth, subsequent CEOs Jack Dorsey and Parag Agrawal, and others.

    “This is where the biggest, most politically sensitive decisions got made. ‘Think high follower account, controversial,’ another Twitter employee told us. For these ‘there would be no ticket or anything,’” she wrote.

    Underscoring that their investigation still continues as the documents “cannot tell the whole story,” Weiss called on former Twitter employees to reach out to her or her team to reveal more about what happens behind the scene.

    The first set of documents detailed Twitter’s decision to restrict an October 2020 New York Post story on the Hunter Biden laptop controversy.

    Billionaire Elon Musk, who completed his takeover of Twitter in October, retweeted Weiss’ post, saying: “The Twitter Files, Part Deux!!” along with popcorn emojis.

    In another tweet, he said Twitter is working on a software update that will “show your true account status, so you know clearly if you’ve been shadowbanned, the reason why and how to appeal.”

  • Twitter Announces It Is Finally Adding An Edit Button

    Twitter Announces It Is Finally Adding An Edit Button

    Twitter will launch a widely requested edit button for its paid subscribers in the coming weeks, the social media company said Thursday.

    For years, Twitter users have demanded the ability to edit their tweets after publishing in order to fix errors like typos. Those requests have led to jokes online that Twitter would rather introduce any other product, such as newsletters, before giving users their top-requested feature.

    Subscribers who pay $4.99 per month for Twitter Blue will soon be able to edit their tweets “a few times” within 30 minutes of publication, Twitter said in a blog post.

    Nearly every other social media platform, including Meta Platform’s Facebook and Instagram, Reddit and Pinterest, have for years offered features allowing users to edit posts.

    https://twitter.com/twitter/status/1565318587736285184?s=21&t=0q0Q-6sb4u-HZNX8mXroVA

    The San Francisco-based company is embroiled in a legal fight with billionaire Elon Musk, who is trying to back out of a $44-billion agreement to buy Twitter.

    In April, on the same day that Musk disclosed a 9% stake in Twitter, he tweeted a poll asking his millions of followers whether they wanted an edit button. Over 70% said yes.

    Twitter and its observers have debated whether allowing tweets to be edited could lead to harmful effects, such as the spread of misinformation.

    Edited tweets will have an icon and timestamp to display when the post was last edited. Users will be able to click on the label of an edited tweet to view the edit history and previous versions of the post.

    Twitter has experimented with versions of an edit button. Subscribers of Twitter Blue, the company’s paid subscription product, currently have access to a feature that holds tweets for up to one minute, allowing users to review the tweet and “undo” it before the post is published.

    Asked if the edit button would eventually be available for all Twitter users, a spokeswoman said Twitter was testing the feature to “anticipate what might happen if we bring it to everyone.”-(Reuters)

  • Ex-Twitter Executive Turned Whistleblower Exposes Platform’s Five Grave Security Failures

    Ex-Twitter Executive Turned Whistleblower Exposes Platform’s Five Grave Security Failures

    Startling new revelations from Twitter’s former head of security, Peiter Zatko, have raised serious new questions about the security of the platform’s service, its ability to identify and remove fake accounts, and the truthfulness of its statements to users, shareholders and federal regulators.

    Zatko – better known by his hacker handle “Mudge” – is a respected cybersecurity expert who first gained prominence in the 1990s and later worked in senior positions at the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Agency and Google.

    Twitter fired him from the security job early this year for what the company called “ineffective leadership and poor performance”. Zatko’s attorneys say that claim is false.

    In a whistleblower complaint made public on Tuesday, Zatko documented his uphill 14-month effort to bolster Twitter security, boost the reliability of its service, repel intrusions by agents of foreign governments and both measure and take action against fake “bot” accounts that spammed the platform.

    In a statement, Twitter called Zatko’s description of events “a false narrative”.

    Here are five takeaways from that whistleblower complaint.

    Security and privacy systems grossly inadequate

    In 2011, Twitter settled a Federal Trade Commission investigation into its privacy practices by agreeing to put stronger data security protections in place. Zatko’s complaint charges that Twitter’s problems grew worse over time instead.

    For instance, the complaint states, Twitter’s internal systems allowed far too many employees access to personal user data they didn’t need for their jobs – a situation ripe for abuse.

    For years, Twitter also continued to mine user data such as phone numbers and email addresses – intended only for security purposes – for ad targeting and marketing campaigns, according to the complaint.

    Entire service could have collapsed irreparably under stress

    One of the most striking revelations in Zatko’s complaint is the claim that Twitter’s internal data systems were so ramshackle – and the company’s contingency plans so insufficient – that any widespread crash or unplanned shutdown could have tanked the entire platform.

    The concern was that a “cascading” data-centre failure could quickly spread across Twitter’s fragile information systems.

    As the complaint put it: “That meant that if all the centres went offline simultaneously, even briefly, Twitter was unsure if they could bring the service back up. Downtime estimates ranged from weeks of round-the-clock work, to permanent irreparable failure.”

    Twitter misled regulators, investors and musk about fake ‘spam’ bots

    In essence, Zatko’s complaint states that Tesla CEO Elon Musk – whose $44 billion (Sh5.2 trillion) bid to acquire Twitter is headed for October trial in a Delaware court – is correct when he charges that Twitter executives have little incentive to accurately measure the prevalence of fake accounts on the system.

    The complaint charges that the company’s executive leadership practiced “deliberate ignorance” on the subject of these so-called spam bots.

    “Senior management had no appetite to properly measure the prevalence of bot accounts,” the complaint states, adding that executives were concerned that accurate bot measurements would harm Twitter’s “image and valuation.”

    Twitter could have been at the mercy of disgruntled employees

    Zatko’s complaint states that as a mob assembled in front of the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, eventually storming the building, he began to worry that employees sympathetic to the rioters might try to sabotage Twitter.

    That concern spiked when he learned it was “impossible” to protect the platform’s core systems from a hypothetical rogue or disgruntled engineer aiming to wreak havoc.

    “There were no logs, nobody knew where data lived or whether it was critical, and all engineers had some form of critical access” to Twitter’s core functions, the complaint states.

    A playground for foreign governments

    The Zatko complaint also highlights Twitter’s difficulty in identifying – much less resisting – the presence of foreign agents on its service. In one instance, the complaint alleges, the Indian government required Twitter to hire specific individuals alleged to be spies, and who would have had significant access to sensitive data thanks to Twitter’s own lax security controls.

    The complaint also alleges a murkier situation involving taking money from unidentified “Chinese entities” that then could access data that might endanger Twitter users in China.

  • Apple Warns Of Security Flaw For iPhones, iPads And Macs

    Apple Warns Of Security Flaw For iPhones, iPads And Macs

    Apple’s latest security update was easy to miss. But security experts are warning that everyone should update any Apple device they have immediately.

    Apple said Wednesday that there are serious security vulnerabilities for iPhones, iPads and Macs that could potentially allow attackers to take complete control of these devices. The issue may already have been “actively exploited,” according to the company. Apple’s issues security updates multiple times a year.

    Without the latest update, a hacker could wrest total control of Apple devices, allowing the intruder to impersonate the true owner and run any software in their name.

    The good news? There’s an easy fix: just update your Apple phone, computer or tablet.

    WHY IS UPDATING YOUR APPLE DEVICE SO URGENT?

    Updates can be time consuming and sluggish. But they are necessary to keep your device safe from hackers who might run malicious code on your device.

    WHY DOESN’T MY APPLE DEVICE DO THIS FOR ME?

    Apple devices are set to automatic updates by default, but it can be quicker to check for the latest updates and do it manually.

    WHAT APPLE DEVICES ARE AFFECTED?

    The affected devices include the iPhone6S and later models; several models of the iPad, including the 5th generation and later, all iPad Pro models and the iPad Air 2; and Mac computers running MacOS Monterey. The flaw also affects some iPod models.

    HOW DO I UPDATE MY DEVICE?

    To update your Apple device to the latest operating system that includes the security patches on your phone go to “Settings,” click “General” and click “Software Update.” On the Mac, go to “System Preferences,” then “Software Update.”

    HOW HIGH IS THE RISK THAT MY PHONE WAS COMPROMISED BEFORE I INSTALLED THE UPDATE?

    Unless you are a journalist, political dissident or human rights activist the chances are extremely low. The kinds of spyware created to exploit vulnerabilities of the type patched by Apple are expensive and employed in targeted hacking.

  • Elon Musk Terminates Deal To Buy Twitter

    Elon Musk Terminates Deal To Buy Twitter

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced Friday that he is pulling out of his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter.

    “Mr. Musk is terminating the Merger Agreement because Twitter is in material breach of multiple provisions of that Agreement,” Musk’s attorney Mike Ringler said in a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) letter dated July 8.

    “(Twitter) appears to have made false and misleading representations upon which Mr. Musk relied when entering into the Merger Agreement, and is likely to suffer a Company Material Adverse Effect,” it said.

    The termination cited a lack of information on bot accounts.

    “For nearly two months, Mr. Musk has sought the data and information necessary to ‘make an independent assessment of the prevalence of fake or spam accounts on Twitter’s platform,’” the letter goes on to say. “This information is fundamental to Twitter’s business and financial performance and is necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.”

    “Twitter has failed or refused to provide this information,” Ringler said in the SEC filing. “Sometimes Twitter has ignored Mr. Musk’s requests, sometimes it has rejected them for reasons that appear to be unjustified, and sometimes it has claimed to comply while giving Mr. Musk incomplete or unusable information.”

    Twitter’s chairman Bret Taylor sent out a tweet following Musk’s announcement.

    “The Twitter Board is committed to closing the transaction on the price and terms agreed upon with Mr. Musk and plans to pursue legal action to enforce the merger agreement,” said Taylor. “We are confident we will prevail in the Delaware Court of Chancery.”

    Depending on what the court decides, technically, under an acquisition agreement with Twitter, Musk at the very least is on the hook for a $1 billion termination fee if the deal is not completed.

    Leading up to his unsolicited April 14 offer to buy the social media platform for $54.20 per share, Musk was a sharp critic of Twitter’s message-posting practices and described the platform as an important forum for free speech.

  • Twitter Directors Okays Musk’s Acquisition Deal

    Twitter Directors Okays Musk’s Acquisition Deal

    Twitter’s board of directors unanimously advised shareholders Tuesday to approve Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s bid to purchase the social media giant for $44 billion.

    “The merger agreement is advisable and the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to, advisable and in the best interests of Twitter and its stockholders,” the board said in a filing to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

    Musk, who previously bought a 9.2% stake in Twitter, made an offer of $54.20 per share for the company in his notification to the SEC on April 14.

    Twitter announced on April 25 that a deal had been reached for the sale of the company to Musk, but Musk said on May 13 that it had been temporarily suspended.

    In a post on his Twitter account, he said the deal was on hold pending “details supporting calculation that spam/fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users.”

  • Man Who Sued Facebook Over Poor Work Conditions In Nairobi Wants Witnesses Protected

    Man Who Sued Facebook Over Poor Work Conditions In Nairobi Wants Witnesses Protected

    A South African man who has sued Facebook owners over a toxic work environment now wants all non-disclosure agreements signed by moderators engaged by a Kenyan company on its behalf quashed.

    Daniel Motaung wants the agreement signed between them as Samasource Kenya declared null and void to the extent that they prevent the moderators from giving evidence in court or participating in the petition.

    It is his argument that all the non-disclosure deeds signed by any former Facebook content moderators engaged through Samasource Kenya are illegal to the extent that they prevent the former content moderators from giving evidence in court.

    The South African says the court should expunge any information that may identify his intended witnesses from the Court`s public record and allow his intended witnesses to use pseudonyms in pleadings and when testifying

    “Court be pleased to issue an order allowing the Petitioner`s intended witnesses to give oral testimony, if it will be required through image and voice distortion or alteration devices”, he seeks.

    Motaung also wants the court to lift the confidentiality veil so that any former moderator who is willing to participate in the petition, does so freely.

    He also wants to be allowed to furnish court with proof that he intended witnesses are persons who qualify as witnesses under The Evidence Act and that such proof be expunged from the court record.

    The former content moderator who resigned in January says unless orders sought are granted there is an imminent risk of the court acting without jurisdiction.

    He further wants an order restraining and barring the respondents by themselves, their employees, their agents, their servants, assigns, successors or anyone acting under their authority, direction, control or instruction from, whether by words or action, making any threats whatsoever to any current or former Facebook Content Moderator and dissuade that content moderator from joining or continuing in the Petition either as litigant or witness.

    “Court be pleased to issue an order  barring the respondents either by themselves, their employees, their agents, their servants, assigns,  successors or anyone acting under their authority, direction, control or instruction from taking any adverse action against the Petitioner, any litigants, witnesses and experts witnesses in this Petition,” he adds.

    According to the court`s documents, the lives and safety of current and former Facebook content moderator will be endangered if there identity are made public. Some of the witnesses are currently engaged through Samasource.

    “The identity of any intended witnesses must be kept private at all times in order for the petitioner to be able to properly to present his case and protection of the identities of the intended witnesses will maximize and improve the quality of the intended witnesses’ evidence as they will be free to provide all relevant evidence without fear of retaliation “, argues Matuong.

    He further claims that there is sufficient evidence of retaliation and adverse action being taken by Samasource, Meta Platforms Inc and Meta Platforms Ireland ltd against whistle-blowers and without court protection the intended witnesses will suffer the same.

    Motuang adds that there is reason to believe Samasource, Meta Platforms Inc and Meta Platforms Ireland ltd will retaliate against the current and former Facebook content moderators should they come forward as witnesses in the case. The current Facebook content moderators fear they will lose their jobs if they testify without court protection.

    He adds that NDAs and the non-disparagemts Deeds that Samasource, Meta Platforms Inc and Meta Platforms Ireland ltd have made with both former and current moderators signed are unconscionable and unconstitutional as they are unlawfully restricting them from advocating for their human rights by testifying in the case.

  • The New Infinix NOTE 12 VIP – True Leadership in Industrial Design Slim Iconic Design With Exceptional Performance

    The New Infinix NOTE 12 VIP – True Leadership in Industrial Design Slim Iconic Design With Exceptional Performance

    Creating a slim yet powerful smartphone has been the goal of smartphone manufacturers all over the world since the release of the first smartphone back in 2008. The main challenge arises when packing in powerful internals such as a bigger battery, high refresh rate screens, high performance camera modules and fast-charing capabilities that take up a lot of room internally. These powerful features make smartphones thicker and slimming them down is often prohibitively expensive on the supplier raising costs for the end user. In many circumstances, the consumer is left with the choice of having a bulky powerful smartphone or a beautifully slim device with lower performance. Infinix aims to change this dynamic, with the release of the new NOTE 12 VIP by utilizing next-level industrial design to fit powerful mid-range internals into a slim and sleek smartphone body, available to consumers around the world at truly attainable price points.

    Looking at the NOTE 12 VIP

    The NOTE 12 VIP takes inspiration from sports car designs to deliver a sophisticated looking device that oozes style while providing top-notch performance. Coming in with a thickness of just 7.89mm and a weight of only 198g, the NOTE 12 VIP is marvel in industrial design with its powerful package containing a large 6.7 inch display, 120W Hyper Charge capabilities and a stunning 108MP cinematic camera. Fitting these incredible internals into such a slim and lightweight device makes the NOTE 12 VIP stand above the crowd as one of the thinnest 120W ultra-fast charging smartphone available on the market today.

    Design with Ultra-thin Glass Fiber

    Fiberglass as a form of glass that is made when glass is drawn or blown into extremely fine fibers, these fibers retain the tensile strength of glass and yet very flexible. Although it has the advantage of being both thin & light, but the sprayed on glass fiber used throughout the industry often makes the devices its present on feel cheap and plastic like. The ultra-thin glass fiber used on the NOTE 12 VIP is an ultra-thin composite material based on ultra-thin glass fiber material combined with optical coating and UV texture. The material consists of 8 layers of glass fiber stacked on top of each other, each layer of glass fiber consists of a precision fusion of glass fiber cloth and resin, with a thickness of only 0.05mm. Combined with a multi-layer nano-level surface process, the glass fiber back cover has a durable and aesthetic looking frosted texture, tested with puncture resistance and an astonishing thickness of just 0.45mm and weighing only 8.5g. The end result is a flexible covering that presents both thin & strong protection to the NOTE 12 VIP in Cayenne Gray and Force Black color schemes for an understated luxurious aesthetic.

    A Stunning AMOLED Screen

    By using a flexible AMOLED screen, the NOTE 12 VIP maintains a slimmer profile when compared to standard AMOLED displays along with the added benefit of richer colors and transparency with the addition of stronger drop resistance. Flexible AMOLED screens have fewer structural components and only weigh a tenth of standard variants allowing the NOTE 12 VIP’s screen to both look better with a thinner profile. In addition, the NOTE 12 VIP adopts COP packaging technology that gives the device a bottom bezel thickness of just 3.1mm with an ultra-high screen to body ratio of 93.1% for a truly immersive smartphone experience.

    The Future of Smartphone Design

    Infinix has always followed a user-centric and demand-oriented design philosophy for all of it’s clients, which paid dividends gaining Infinix certifications from prestigious organizations within the industry for respective device launches. The Infinix Zero 8 and Infinix Note 10 Pro have consecutively won the German IF Design Award, while Infinix Concept Phone won the CMF Supreme Gold Award of the CMF Design Award. These awards represent the quality of Infinix devices and their strive to continue making the best possible devices for users at attainable price points for young consumers worldwide. Infinix is a brand that’s moving forward, seeking to improve and democratize high-end technology, making it accessible & available at reasonable and fair price points

  • Infinix Set To Launch Much Anticipated NOTE 12 Series With Ultra-Fast Charging In Kenya

    Infinix Set To Launch Much Anticipated NOTE 12 Series With Ultra-Fast Charging In Kenya

    Infinix is set to release its all-new NOTE 12 Series that includes high- performance variants with the 120W Hyper Charge capabilities, a sleek 6.7” FHD+ Super Light AMOLED display with 120Hz refresh rate, 108MP Cinematic Triple Camera and more. The series includes two variants – the NOTE 12 VIP, NOTE 12 G96 that offer well rounded, innovative performance features such as aerospace-grade ultra-thin glass fiber, up to 5GB of extended random access memory (RAM) and 103 charging and battery protections that keep users’ devices charged safely up whenever they need them.

    “Infinix is creating a new standard for high-quality smartphone performance and design with its new NOTE 12 Series, which embodies impeccable form and function.” shared Vento Lin, Product Manager of NOTE Series at Infinix Mobility. “This series packs quick-charging power and strong chipsets into an iconic design that is perfect for emerging professionals who need a light, flexible and high-performance device.”, Infinix, Country Manager, Mike Zhang.

    The Future of Fast Charging

    The NOTE 12 VIP is one of the thinnest smartphones equipped with 120W ultra-fast hyper charging speeds, making this lightweight smartphone more portable than ever while staying powered all day long.

    Infinix integrated the NOTE 12 VIP smartphone with 120W Hyper Charge and a 4500mAh battery to give users maximized battery capacity and supersonic charging speeds that power up the device from 0% to 100% battery power in just 17-minutes1. To help achieve fast-charging capabilities, Infinix incorporated a dual-charge pump and dual-cell battery. This enables the NOTE 12 VIP to adjust the voltage and amperage to the optimal ratio, as well as doubles the available input.

    Keeping ultra-fast charging safe, the smartphone includes 103 charging and battery protection features, which span the entire charging cycle for the charger, circuit and battery. On top of the all-encompassing projection features, the NOTE 12 VIP also has 18 thermal sensors to monitor the device’s temperature in real-time to ensure that the smartphone charging is always safe. Enhancing the charging benefits even further, the NOTE 12 VIP uses platinum superconducting material that increases the corrosion resistance of the charging cable for great charging material longevity.

    By combining all of these beneficial features, the NOTE 12 VIP’s charge cycle counts up to 800 with up to 85%2 battery capacity retained. Additionally, the NOTE 12 VIP’s 120W Hyper Charge is certified by the Tü V Rheinland Safe Fast-Charge System certification, which proves its reliability and longevity when charging daily.

    In addition to the NOTE 12 VIP, the NOTE 12 G96 is equipped with a 5000mAh battery with 33W Super Charge.

    Breathtaking Design Language

    The NOTE 12 VIP boasts a stylish and sophisticated design wrapped with high-performance features to create the ideal smartphone. The device utilizes aerospace-grade ultra-thin glass fiber material with the texture of glass and the strength of carbon fiber. The material gives the NOTE 12 VIP feather-light proportions and a 7.89mm ultra-sleek design that weighs only 199 grams

    The design.

    Encased in this next-level design is a 6.7”3 FHD+ Super Light AMOLED display that provides users with a crisp screen packed with crucial image features such as 100% DCI-P3 color gamut, 10-bit color depth with over 1 billion colors and great contrast ratios. The AMOLED display features a flexible screen that enables a stunningly capable 3.1mm narrow lower bezel and a 93.1% screen to body ratio with stronger screen impact resistance. The display also provides users with a silky-smooth visual experience with a sharp 120Hz ultra-refresh rate and 360Hz touch sampling that instantly synchronizes with every swipe.

    Additionally, a low blue light eye comfort certification, accredited by TÜV Rheinland, the NOTE 12 VIP allows users to enjoy hours of use with less eye fatigue.

    Users can also experience immersive visuals with the NOTE 12 G96’s 6.7” FHD+ True Color AMOLED display that yields crystal clear brightness even in broad daylight offering a range of flexible options for different consumers.

    Capture Fantastic Photos

    The NOTE 12 VIP smartphone’s 108MP Cinematic Triple Camera, consists of a 13MP Ultra-wide angle lens and a Depth lens with Laser Detection Auto Focus that shoots fantastic photos. The camera incorporates a large 1/1.67-inch sensor with a 12000×9000 ultra-high resolution. It supports 9-in-1 pixel binning, producing large 1.92μm pixels that take in more light for maximum detail. The addition of Laser Detection Auto Focus also effectively improves the phone’s focus in low light conditions.

    Powerful camera.

    The NOTE 12 G96 is equipped with a 50MP Ultra Night Camera with a depth and AI lens. All devices in the NOTE 12 lineup feature a 16MP selfie camera for the perfect selfie.

    All the Speed & Power You Need

    The MediaTek Helio G96 Ultra Gaming Processor provides more speed and power to the NOTE 12 G96 and NOTE 12 VIP. The octa-core processer incorporates two powerful Arm Cortex-A76 processor cores clocked up to 2.05GHz and Arm Mali G57 GPU that works in tandem to harness next-level intelligence for groundbreaking performance. This is paired with fast 2133MHz LPDDR4X memory and turbo-charged UFS 2.2 storage that yields super-fast data bandwidth.
    Infinix expands the NOTE 12 VIP, NOTE 12 G96’s 8GB memory to 13GB by integrating RAM and ROM to provide users with up to 5GB extended RAM. This improves the smartphone’s processing speed and accelerates performance when users are using their smartphone to multi-task with various functions and tasks delivering extra power when it’s needed.

    Additional key features:

    • Dual Speakers with DTS: The NOTE 12 Series creates a powerful 360-degree surround sound with enhanced audio.

    • Graphene Cooling System: The NOTE 12 VIP has 9-Layer Colling System with graphene and Vapor-Chamber Liquid Cooling for up to 15-degrees Celsius reduction4 in core temperature. Additionally, the NOTE 12 G96 is equipped with a 10-Layered Graphene Cooling system.

    • Linear Motor Tactile Systems: The NOTE 12 VIP integrates a Dual X-axis Linear Motor Tactile System giving users a completely new touch experience while gaming. Meanwhile, the NOTE 12 G96 boasts a Linear Motor Tactile System that simulates shorter and crisper vibrations while gaming.

    • Infinix’s Dar-Link 2.0: The software improves image stability based on an AI algorithm, while simultaneously reducing device temperature for an immersive gaming experience.

    XOS 10.6 Software: The NOTE 12 Series features new XOS 10.6 software based on Android 12, which includes new features such as Storage Optimizer, Lightning Multi-Window, Privacy Guardian and more. Additionally, the NOTE 12 VIP supports Folax AI voice assistant adding quality of life improvements.

    Prices will be announced at the product launch happening at the Sarit Centre Expo you can catch the event through live stream here

    The NOTE 12 VIP will be available in Cayenne Grey and Force Black in 256+8GB; the NOTE 12 G96 will be available in Sapphire Blue, Force Black and Snowfall in 128GB+8GB and NOTE 12i 128+4GB.

  • Why Millions Of Africans Are Right To Resist Mandatory Mobile SIM Card Registration

    Why Millions Of Africans Are Right To Resist Mandatory Mobile SIM Card Registration

    * Any views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author and not of Kenya Insights.

    In recent weeks, millions of Nigerians have been barred from making calls after the government instructed telecommunications providers to disconnect their SIM cards because they failed to comply with the government directive to register and link them to their digital ID, known as the National Identity Number (NIN).

    Most countries in Africa – 50 nations according to research by Privacy International – and around the world require SIM registration to identify the user.  However, Nigeria has gone further by requiring SIM cards to be registered and linked with a citizen’s digital ID, and therefore with the biometric data that it contains. Nigeria is not alone in doing this: some 30 countries globally require SIM registration linked to digital ID including biometric data such as fingerprints or facial images.

    Such a registration policy excludes many marginalised groups such as some ethnic minorities or migrant workers without ID proof such as a birth certificates, needed to obtain a digital ID. This locks them out from obtaining a SIM – and therefore from mobile connectivity – and from government services that increasingly require mobile or internet service to access.

    Secondly, SIM registration linked to digital ID is causing concerns about privacy rights – not only in Nigeria but also in Uganda, Zambia and Kenya – in the absence of sufficient legal safeguards to protect their data. More so, where there is a historical record of abuse by authorities.

    From our research at the African Digital Rights Network, we believe citizens are right to be concerned. Linking digital IDs and mobile SIMs, and linking these with mobile banking apps and other digital services, is the “unholy trinity” of digital surveillance. When combined with further government or corporate data, this surveillance stack enables governments to track an individual’s real-time movements, transactions, email, voice and social media communications, providing a powerful infrastructure for state surveillance.

    Digital identification is becoming a central component of repressive digital surveillance. In the six African countries we studied, we found governments making major investments in surveillance technologies, not only in digital IDs and SIM registration, but also in CCTV, encryption breaking and car licence plate and facial recognition systems. They also created laws forcing telecom companies to capture and store citizens’ communications for possible state use.

    In Nigeria, that fear was exacerbated in February, when it was reported that President Muhammadu Buhari had allowed security agencies to access the NIN database. The government’s argument for mandatory registration of SIM cards linked to digital IDs hinges on security, and allowing governments to track criminality. However, there is no evidencethat mandatory SIM registration lowers crime or makes a difference in crime detection.

    Everyone wants governments to track the most serious criminals to prevent mass atrocities. But citizens also want governments to respect and protect everyone’s right to privacy. Due to the covert nature of surveillance, and the large power imbalance between the state and the people being watched, there is a clear opportunity to abuse power: our research on surveillance law in Africa shows that most surveillance is conducted on political opponents, business rivals, journalists, civil society activists and low-level criminals. These are all in violation of privacy rights.

    In most African countries including Nigeria, it is also in violation of the constitution, international human rights conventions, and domestic laws which protect privacy of communication. However, branches of the state regularly violate this privacy law, and they do so with impunity, with no accountability for such violations.

    To protect citizens against abuses of their data and privacy rights, robust data protection and privacy laws are needed that provide for independent oversight bodies with the independence, resources and power to monitor surveillance practices, and hold governments and corporations accountable for any breaches.

    Citizens have a right to legal citizenship and to access government services and entitlements. This should not be contingent on a biometric ID system that locks out the most vulnerable, and enables repressive governments to conduct mass surveillance.

    Dr Tony Roberts is a research fellow at the Institute of Development Studies, and a member of the African Digital Rights Network. Ridwan Oloyede is a legal practitioner, research fellow and consultant based in Nigeria, and a member of the African Digital Rights Network.

  • Twitter May Start Charging Fee For Some Users, Musk Says

    Twitter May Start Charging Fee For Some Users, Musk Says

    Elon Musk said on Tuesday Twitter Inc. might charge a “slight” fee for commercial and government users, part of the billionaire entrepreneur’s push to grow revenue which has lagged behind larger rivals like Meta Platforms Inc’s Facebook.

    “Twitter will always be free for casual users, but maybe a slight cost for commercial/government users,” Musk said in a tweet. “Some revenue is better than none!” he added in another tweet.

    Last week, Reuters reported that Musk told banks he would develop new ways to monetize tweets and crack down on executive pay to slash costs at the social media platform company.

    Musk also told the banks he planned to develop features to grow business revenue, including new ways to make money out of tweets that contain important information or go viral, sources told Reuters.

    At the annual Met Gala in New York on Monday, Musk said the reach of Twitter was currently only “niche,” and he would want a much bigger percentage of the country to be on it.

    Musk, also the chief executive officer of top electric vehicle maker Tesla Inc. has been suggesting a raft of changes to Twitter since last month.

    Elon Musk.

    In tweets which were subsequently deleted, Musk suggested changes to Twitter Blue premium subscription service, including slashing its price, banning advertising and giving an option to pay in the cryptocurrency dogecoin.

    After inking the deal to buy Twitter for $44 billion last week, Musk said he wanted to enhance the platform with new features, make the algorithms open source to increase trust, defeat spam bots, and authenticate all humans.

  • Done Deal! Elon Musk Buys Twitter For $44B

    Done Deal! Elon Musk Buys Twitter For $44B

    (AP)-Elon Musk reached an agreement to buy Twitter for roughly $44 billion on Monday, promising a more lenient touch to policing content on the platform where he promotes his interests, attacks critics and opines on social and economic issues to more than 83 million followers.

    The outspoken Tesla CEO, who is also the world’s wealthiest person, has said he wanted to own and privatize Twitter because he thinks it’s not living up to its potential as a platform for free speech.

    Musk said in a joint statement with Twitter that he wants to make the service “better than ever” with new features, such as getting rid of automated “spam bots” and making its algorithms open to the public to increase trust.

    “Free speech is the bedrock of a functioning democracy, and Twitter is the digital town square where matters vital to the future of humanity are debated,” Musk said, adding hearts, stars and rocket emojis in a tweet that highlighted the statement.

    A more hands-off approach to content moderation has many people concerned the platform will become more of a haven for disinformation and hate speech, something it has worked hard on in recent years to mitigate.

    The deal was cemented roughly two weeks after the billionaire first revealed a 9 percent stake in the platform. Musk said last week that he had lined up $46.5 billion in financing to buy Twitter, putting pressure on the company’s board to negotiate a deal.

    Twitter said the transaction was unanimously approved by its board of directors and is expected to close in 2022.

    Shares of Twitter Inc. rose 6% Monday to $52 per share. On April 14, Musk announced an offer to buy the social media platform for $54.20 per share. While the stock is up sharply since Musk made his offer, it is well below the high of $77 per share it reached in February 2021.

    Musk has described himself as a “free-speech absolutist” but is also known for blocking or disparaging other Twitter users who question or disagree with him.

    In recent weeks, he has voiced a number of proposed changes for the company, from relaxing its content restrictions — such as the rules that suspended former President Donald Trump’s account — to ridding the platform of fake and automated accounts, and shifting away from its advertising-based revenue model. Musk believes he can increase revenue through subscriptions that give paying customers a better experience, perhaps even an ad-free version of Twitter.

    Asked during a recent TED talk if there are any limits to his notion of “free speech,” Musk said Twitter or any forum is “obviously bound by the laws of the country that it operates in. So obviously there are some limitations on free speech in the US, and, of course, Twitter would have to abide by those rules.”

    Beyond that, though, he said he’d be “very reluctant” to delete things and in general be cautious about permanent bans.

    It won’t be perfect, Musk added, “but I think we want it to really have the perception and reality that speech is as free as reasonably possible.”

    After the deal was announced, the NAACP released a statement that urged Musk not to allow former President Trump, the 45th president, back onto the platform.

    “Disinformation, misinformation and hate speech have NO PLACE on Twitter,” the civil rights organization said in a statement. “Do not allow 45 to return to the platform. Do not allow Twitter to become a petri dish for hate speech, or falsehoods that subvert our democracy.”

    Efforts to “deregulate” Twitter could thwart the company’s current commitment to making the platform as safe as possible for all users, said Brooke Erin Duffy, professor of communication at Cornell University and an expert on social media. ”

    “Marginalized communities of users are especially vulnerable to the forms of hate and harassment that so often circulate in unregulated online spaces,” she said.

    Some users said Monday that they were planning to quit the platform if Musk took it over. To which he responded on Twitter: “I hope that even my worst critics remain on Twitter, because that is what free speech means.”

    Musk has battled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on multiple occasions, as he has used Twitter to taunt the regulators.

    The SEC has been investigating Musk’s August 2018 tweets in which he asserted that he’d secured funding to take Tesla private for $420 a share, though he had not. Musk is fighting an SEC subpoena in the case in federal court. More recently, Musk appeared to have violated SEC rules by failing to disclose at the point he reached a 5% stake in Twitter, waiting until he had more than 9%.

    Noteworthy as they are, the SEC matters have no bearing on Musk’s fitness to buy a company, according to St. John’s University business professor Anthony Sabino, making it unlikely that they would represent roadblocks to the takeover.

    With initial concerns of its own about the deal, Twitter had enacted an anti-takeover measure known as a poison pill that could make a takeover attempt prohibitively expensive. But the board decided to negotiate after Musk updated his proposal last week to show he had secured financing, according to The Wall Street Journal.

    While Twitter’s user base of more than 200 million remains much smaller than those of rivals such as Facebook and TikTok, the service is popular with celebrities, world leaders, journalists and intellectuals. Musk himself is a prolific tweeter with a following that rivals several pop stars in the ranks of the most popular accounts.

    Last week, he said in documents filed with U.S. securities regulators that the money would come from Morgan Stanley and other banks, some of it secured by his huge stake in Tesla.

    Musk is the world’s wealthiest person, according to Forbes, with a nearly $279 billion fortune. But much of his money is tied up in Tesla stock — he owns about 17% of the electric car company, according to FactSet, which is valued at more than $1 trillion — and SpaceX, his privately held space company. It’s unclear how much cash Musk has.

    Musk began making his fortune in 1999 when he sold Zip2, an online mapping and business directory, to Compaq for $307 million. He used his share to create what would become PayPal, an internet service that bypassed banks and allowed consumers to pay businesses directly. It was sold to eBay for $1.5 billion in 2002.

    That same year, Musk founded Space Exploration Technologies, or SpaceX, after finding that cost constraints were limiting NASA’s interplanetary travel. The company eventually developed cost-effective reusable rockets.

    In 2004, Musk was courted to invest in Tesla, then a startup trying to build an electric car. Eventually he became CEO and led the company to astronomical success as the world’s most valuable automaker and largest seller of electric vehicles.

    Musk’s pledge to make Twitter a haven for free speech could dim the appeal of Donald Trump’s troubled Truth Social app, which the former president has touted as a competitor to Twitter that would cater to conservatives. Truth Social is part of Trump’s new media company, which has agreed to be taken public by Digital World Acquisition Corp. Shares of DWAC dropped 16.2% Monday and are down 46% since Musk revealed his stake in Twitter.

  • Explainer: Will Elon Musk Be Able To Buy Twitter?

    Explainer: Will Elon Musk Be Able To Buy Twitter?

    Even for the richest person on the planet, buying Twitter was always going to be a challenge –- a highly complex financial transaction now made even trickier by a defensive “poison pill” move from the platform’s board.

    Musk’s $43 billion offer lays out the myriad potential pitfalls: possible government approvals, legal as well as regulatory due diligence, negotiations of a final agreement and, of course, how to pay for it all.

    Then Twitter’s board on Friday showed it won’t go quietly, saying any acquisition of over 15 percent of the firm’s stock without its OK would trigger a plan to flood the market with shares and thus make a buyout much harder.

    “Your move @elonmusk,” tweeted Silicon Valley journalist Kara Swisher.

    The offer itself, which Musk said was final, values Twitter at $54.20 per share — above the closing price ahead of his bid, but below a high of $77.06 hit in February of last year.

    Even with a moderate and inflexible proposal, which could help the board argue for rejection, it’s a fraught moment that could end in lawsuits from just about everyone involved.

    To succeed in repelling Musk’s offer, the Twitter board will need to be on solid ground making an argument that the company is worth more, said Wharton School finance professor Kevin Kaiser.

    Shareholders who feel that the board is rejecting a profitable deal will be free to file lawsuits against Twitter.

    Sidestep the board?

    Musk has the option of sidestepping the board and trying to buy shares directly from shareholders on the market, but that could lead to tedious negotiations with some stock owners holding out for more money.

    “The Twitter board has limited ability under Delaware law to stop a tender offer made directly to the shareholders, which Elon Musk hasn’t done, but which he could do if he chose to,” Kaiser said.

    “If he does this, and if the shareholders elect to tender their shares, then he can succeed without needing board support or approval.”

    While the serial entrepreneur’s net worth is estimated at $265 billion by Forbes, his fortune is not sitting in a bank account waiting to be spent.

    Musk said at a TED Conference that he had “sufficient funds” to consummate the deal, but financial analysts describe the situation as more complicated.

    Much of Musk’s wealth comes from shares of electric car maker Tesla, which he runs.

    Musk would need to turn a chunk of his Tesla holding into cash, either by selling shares or taking out loans with stock as collateral.

    “The specifics of how Musk would finance the deal will determine the ramifications for Twitter,” Moody’s said in a note to investors.

    Moody’s estimated it would cost Musk $39 billion to buy all the outstanding Twitter shares, and that there would be “a strong chance” he would have to repay or refinance the San Francisco-based company’s billions of dollars of existing debt.

    That was before the poison pill move by Twitter that ramps up the cost for Musk.

    Musk tweeted a poll that hinted he might be thinking of taking his bid directly to shareholders.

    He asked whether taking the company private for his offered price should be up to shareholders and not the board.

    As the poll neared its close on Friday, more than 2.7 million votes had been cast with nearly 84 percent of them in favor of the idea.

    Selling a massive amount of shares in Tesla to buy Twitter would come with a large tax bill based on capital gains, and could cause shares in the electric car company to sink as the market is flooded with stock for sale.

    Musk could keep hold of his shares and get a loan, absorbing the interest payments. Or he could team up with a deep-pocketed partner, but that could come with the strong-willed executive having someone to answer to regarding his decisions at Twitter.-AFP.

  • WhatsApp Is Introducing A New Interesting Feature

    WhatsApp Is Introducing A New Interesting Feature

    Instant messaging platform WhatsApp, which is owned by Meta, has announced that it would be introducing ‘Communities’, a feature for grouping together similar interest groups.

    This feature however will initially be rolled out to a small, select number of groups and will let thousands participate in a community that hosts multiple sub-group chats.

    The reason for introducing this feature is that various organizations, from a school to a business whose employees communicate on WhatsApp, can more easily organize discussions and have their admins message everyone across different groups.
    Users can create a community by adding groups featuring a similar theme and admins can then manage those groups within and send messages to all groups at the same time.

    This way individual conversations related to that group can continue while also getting announcements that impact all groups at the same time. ‘Communities’ will support end-to-end encryption.

    Regarding discoverability, WhatsApp has stated that it will not be adding the option to search or discover new communities unlike “other apps”. It will also be reducing the ability to forward messages from the current limit of five to just one group at a time. This move is designed to proactively thwart the spread of potentially harmful posts, like spam and illegal sexual content.

    The platform will also be banning individual community members or admins, and disbanding a community if it becomes aware of illegal, violent, or hateful activities within a community.

    WhatsApp will also introduce improvements to how individual groups work, regardless of whether they are part of a community or not.

    Groups will be able to have emoji reactions for messages, so members can react to a particular message without sending separate emoji messages.

    Admins will also be able to delete messages in a group, which will then be removed from everyone’s device. File sharing will be upgraded to support files up to 2GB in size and finally, one-tap voice calling will now support up to 32 members.

  • Hackers Steal Over $600M In Major Cryptocurrency Heist

    Hackers Steal Over $600M In Major Cryptocurrency Heist

    (AFP)-Hackers stole cryptocurrency worth over $600 million from a digital ledger used by players of the popular online game Axie Infinity, in a major digital cash heist revealed Tuesday.

    Interest in cryptocurrency has boomed, along with its values, but the money has also become an attractive target for tech savvy thieves.

    Ronin Network said the attack targeting its blockchain netted 173,600 ether and $25.5 million worth of stablecoin, a digital asset pegged to the US dollar.

    The haul was valued at $545 million when it was stolen on March 23, but was worth about $615 million based on prices Tuesday, making it one of largest thefts ever in the crypto world.

    “Most of the hacked funds are still in the hacker’s wallet,” Ronin said in a post revealing the theft.

    Unable to withdraw

    The team at Sky Mavis, maker of battle and trading game Axie Infinity, discovered the security breach on Tuesday after a user was unable to withdraw ether, according to the company.

    Ronin was still investigating the hack, but said that hackers got hold of private “keys” to withdraw digital funds.

    “We know trust needs to be earned and are using every resource at our disposal to deploy the most sophisticated security measures and processes to prevent future attacks,” Ronin said.

    “We are working with law enforcement officials, forensic cryptographers, and our investors to make sure there is no loss of user funds.”

    In Axie Infinity, players participate in battles using colourful blob-like Axies, and are mainly rewarded “Smooth Love Potion” (SLPs) that can be exchanged for cryptocurrency or cash — or invested back into the game’s virtual world Lunacia.

    Users from Philippines

    About 35 per cent of Axie Infinity traffic — and the biggest share of its 2.5 million daily active users — comes from the Philippines, where high proficiency in English, strong gaming culture and widespread smartphone usage have fuelled its popularity, according to Sky Mavis.

    To play the game, players first have to purchase at least three Axies.

    An Axie is an NFT — a unique, non-fungible token, with a particular set of abilities and characteristics. Like NFT pieces of art, they are stored on the blockchain — a digital ledger that cannot be changed.

    Axies can be bought, sold or rented to other players. Owners can also breed them to create new Axies that provide more value.

  • Facebook To Scrutinize Political Adverts From Kenya Ahead Of General Elections

    Facebook To Scrutinize Political Adverts From Kenya Ahead Of General Elections

    Facebook parent company, Meta, has announced it will require owners of political advertisements In Kenya to provide their real identity as proof before publishing the ads on the platform including Instagram.

    Meta says the tools and resources which target political ads ahead of the 2022 general election slated for August 9, 2022, are meant to enhance elections integrity and transparency in political advertising.

    This is expected to help voters know who is behind the political ads they see on Facebook and Instagram while equipping political advertisers with key resources to reach and engage their supporters and potential voters throughout the election period.

    Meta says advertisers seeking to run political ads in Kenya will undergo a verification process to prove who they are and that they live in the country.

    Meta will then run additional checks to ensure compliance with its policies. Political ads in Kenya will also be labelled with a “Paid for by” disclaimer to show who’s behind the ad.

    Additionally, the firm will put political ads that run in Kenya on its Ads Library in order to be seen ensure voters are able to see what ads are running, information about targeting, and how much was spent.

    Meta Public Policy Director for East and Horn of Africa Mercy Ndegwa said the fully searchable archive will store the ads for seven years.

    “Meta has continued to invest in technology towards election integrity. We believe political discussion and debate should be transparent to every voter, which is why over the past few years we’ve introduced a number of tools that provide more information about political ads on Facebook and Instagram,” said Ndegwa.

    Meta announced last year that it was rolling out new controls so that people can choose to see fewer social issues, electoral, and political ads.

    When people use these controls, they’ll no longer see ads that run with a “Paid for by” disclaimer, said the firm.

  • PayPal Sued For Stealing Users Money After Freezing, Seizing Funds

    PayPal Sued For Stealing Users Money After Freezing, Seizing Funds

    PayPal is facing a class-action lawsuit alleging that the digital payments company violated racketeering laws by freezing customer funds without offering an explanation.

    When users contacted PayPal about the frozen funds, they were told they had violated the company’s “acceptable use policy” but weren’t told how that violation had occurred, the lawsuit says. What’s more, it alleges that in at least one instance, PayPal said that a user would “have to get a subpoena” to find out why.

    “PayPal violates its own Agreement by failing to provide adequate notice to users whose accounts have had holds placed on them,” the lawsuit says. When PayPal does let users know it placed a hold on their funds, “it does not inform such users why such funds are being held, how they can obtain a release of the hold, and/or how they can avoid future holds being placed on their accounts.”

    It also says that PayPal takes the money for itself after a 180-day hold period. “PayPal’s user agreement and acceptable use policy cannot be used as a ‘license to steal,’” the complaint says.

    “Never able to reach a live person”

    The three lead plaintiffs claim they had nearly $250,000 seized by PayPal. One plaintiff, Shbadan Akylbekov, ran a storefront selling hyaluron pens, which are filled with hyaluronic acid, a dermal filler that is used to reduce wrinkles. He said that PayPal took $172,206.43 from his wife’s account, which he used for his store, with no explanation. After numerous calls and letters to PayPal, he was finally told that the seizure was “for its liquidated damages arising from those [acceptable use policy] violations pursuant to the User Agreement.” He claims he never received a copy of that policy until his account was restricted. 

    Later, PayPal said it used those funds to reimburse customers who had purchased hyaluron pens from his store. Akylbekov followed up by asking to see documentation of the customers who requested refunds. A PayPal customer service representative said the report would be available within two days, but Akylbekov says he still hasn’t received it.

    Then, PayPal sent Akylbekov a 1099K form saying that he owed taxes on $162,517.19. “PayPal essentially claimed a deduction for an expense that it never paid. PayPal seized $172,206.43, while reporting only $162,517.19 to the IRS,” the lawsuit alleges. 

    Another PayPal user, Roni Shemtov, says that she was given three different explanations for why the company took a total of $42,351.87 from her account. The first customer service representative said she had violated the acceptable use policy “by using the same IP address and computer that other PayPal users used.” A second told her that she violated the AUP by holding multiple PayPal accounts, which Shemtov denies. A third said she ran afoul of the policy by selling yoga clothing at 20–30 percent below retail price. 

    Shemtov was also sent an IRS form stating that she owed taxes on the funds that PayPal seized.

    The third plaintiff, Lena Evans, says she had $26,984 taken from her PayPal account. Evans, who founded the nonprofit Poker League of Nations, used her account for buying and selling on eBay to organize poker leagues and to operate her nonprofit, which seeks to increase the number of women who play poker. She says that PayPal did not explain the seizure, even after repeated emailed requests. “She also tried calling PayPal a number of times but was never able to reach a live person,” the lawsuit says.

    PayPal told Ars that it’s reviewing the filing. “We will respond to the allegations through the appropriate legal channels in due course,” a spokesperson said.

    Triple damages

    The lawsuit appears to have been organized by Chris Moneymaker, a professional poker player who won the 2003 World Series of Poker. Moneymaker said that PayPal placed a hold on $12,000 of his money, and he threatened to sue the company. “Anyone else that got funds confiscated by PayPal feel free to reach out to my lawyers whom [sic] are starting a class action suit,” he said in a tweetlast May.

    The lawsuit is seeking triple damages for the plaintiffs and class members.

    Enter your email to get the Ars Technica newsletter

  • Aidos Kuneen Boss Ricardo Badoer Threatens To Sue Blogger Over Crypto Scam Claims

    Aidos Kuneen Boss Ricardo Badoer Threatens To Sue Blogger Over Crypto Scam Claims

    Wazito FC owner Ricardo Badoer has threatened to sue a Kenyan whistleblower site Kahawa Tungu over claims that he has defrauded Sh16B from investors in his Aidos Kuneen cryptocurrency platform.

    According to the blog post, the tough-talking Swedish tycoon has allegedly withheld assets totaling up to Sh16 billion from the Japanese investors.

    The victims additionally claim that after constantly bugging him with questions regarding their funds, Badoer blocked all communication channels that lead to his access and that of the company.

    “Most of the investors are Japanese. He has withheld their assets and blocks anyone on Twitter or Aidos Market Telegram who asks about their money,” the source told a local tabloid.

    In this case, it is like a bank denying customer withdrawals for fear of client panic withdrawals similar to what happened to Chase bank or almost with Family Bank some time back.” reads the claims on the blog.

    Chase Bank was run down due to bad internal loans and a bank run ensued when panicked depositors rushed to empty their savings.

    As of the publishing of this post, Badoer’s crypto market announced an unprecedented suspension of activities.

    In a statement published on Twitter, Aidos Kuneen apologized for taking the network down and claimed it was due to an ongoing migration plan.

    “Due to potential security bug found in the old Address format, we need to take the network down for a few days to work on the migration plan to the new format,” they wrote.

    User questions security of platform.

    Ricardo who owns Badoer Investments is active is sports, financial and news field according to the website. We’re told he holds stakes in Business Today, a local news website.

    Apart from Wazito FC, Badoer has made inroads within the region including Tanzania where he pumped in over TSh2.2 billion ($1 million) into Arusha-based Hakika Microfinance Bank (Hakika MFB).

    He also bought The ALTX East Africa Exchange, a securities exchange company in Uganda.

    He was also an investor in Shona EPZ even though it appears they fell out. From his uncensored tweet.

     

    Mr Badoer also invested $1 million (Ksh100 million) in Sumac Microfinance Bank to purchase a 15.6 per cent stake in the firm based in Nairobi, Kenya, in the recent past. He however got into loggerheads with the firm’s board and was eventually kicked out.

    Known for his erratic behavior, Ricardo has vowed to go after the blog that reportedly blew up a cover on him. “Is unbelievable how stupid you can be!! Making shit up!!! My lawyers will fix.” He said of the blog.