Kenya Insights

Category: Politics

  • He Had To Go! Mudavadi Defends Kenya’s Role in Besigye Arrest in Nairobi

    He Had To Go! Mudavadi Defends Kenya’s Role in Besigye Arrest in Nairobi

    Kenya has defended its role in the arrest and return of Ugandan opposition leader Dr. Kizza Besigye, with Foreign Affairs Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi saying the reason for Besigye’s presence in the country was unclear from the beginning.

    Speaking on Citizen TV’s The Explainer show, Mudavadi said Besigye’s stay in Kenya became diplomatically sensitive as issues unfolded.

    “He came here, and there were issues, and he had to go,” Mudavadi said.

    “I think the manner in which he had come to Kenya were (sic) not quite clear, and at that time, him being here, and of course, certain issues were beginning to evolve… I would rather leave it at that, because he’s now in the custody of his nation and his authorities.”

    Mudavadi explained that Kenya’s decision to work with Ugandan authorities was based on national interest and the need to maintain strong ties with its neighbors.

    “We always look at national interest. We have to partner with our East African States, and sometimes we have to manage those relations very carefully for the broader national interest,” he said.

    The Foreign Affairs Chief noted that Besigye did not formally seek asylum in Kenya, which may have affected how the government handled the situation.

    “Had he said that he was seeking asylum, maybe the treatment would’ve been different,” Mudavadi remarked.

    Musalia Mudavadi.
    Musalia Mudavadi.

    Highlighting the economic links between Kenya and Uganda, Mudavadi pointed out that the countries depend on each other for trade and jobs.

    “Uganda is Kenya’s trading partner; a lot of lives and jobs are dependent on that relationship,” he said.

    “What would happen to the Kenyan economy if there were no more trade between Kenya and Uganda?”

    Besigye, a vocal critic of Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, was arrested in Kenya in November 2024 and returned to Uganda under circumstances that sparked criticism from activists and opposition supporters.

    The Kenyan government has maintained that it acted in line with diplomatic duties and national priorities, a stance Mudavadi reinforced during the interview.

    In February, 68-year-old Besigye was charged with treason by a Ugandan court. Despite his poor health following a hunger strike, his requests to be moved to a hospital were denied.

  • Why Elon Musk Is Slashing His Political Spending in 2025

    Why Elon Musk Is Slashing His Political Spending in 2025

    After shaking up the 2024 election with massive donations, Elon Musk now plans to scale back. The billionaire, who spent over $250 million supporting Donald Trump’s campaign, says he has “done enough” and sees no reason to keep spending big on politics.

    With public backlash growing and his companies under pressure, Musk is pulling away from political ventures.

    He’s choosing to focus more on Tesla and step back from the controversial White House cost-cutting project known as Doge. Here’s why this pivot matters—and what it means for Musk’s future.

    Why Elon Musk Is Slashing His Political Spending in 2025
    Elon Musk’s decision to cut back on political spending marks a major shift in strategy. After facing public backlash, business pressure, and limited political wins, he’s choosing to step away from politics and focus on Tesla. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Elon Musk Spending Shifts Focus After a Stormy Political Run

    In 2024, Elon Musk burst into politics as a mega-donor for Donald Trump. His $250 million political push made headlines, sparked protests, and drew attention to his companies—Tesla, Starlink, and X. But in 2025, Musk says he’s stepping away.

    Speaking at an economic conference in Qatar, Musk announced plans to “do a lot less” political spending. He told the audience he no longer sees a reason to continue at the same scale. “If I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it. I do not currently see a reason,” he said.

    That’s a major shift. Musk’s political influence peaked last year. He attended campaign events with Trump, helped push the Doge program to cut federal spending, and backed state-level candidates with millions. But now, Musk says his top priority is staying at Tesla’s helm for at least five more years.

    As pressure mounts and critics grow louder, Musk appears to be cutting his political losses.

    Political Backlash Hurts His Brands

    Musk’s entry into politics came with serious consequences. His public support for Trump and his role in Doge—an effort to slash federal spending—sparked protests across the U.S. Some Tesla customers boycotted. Others vandalized Tesla vehicles.

    The political heat also reached his boardroom. Investors raised concerns that Musk wasn’t focused enough on Tesla. With sales dropping and government investigations circling, it became harder to defend his political activity as separate from business.

    His companies rely on government contracts and regulatory approvals. That makes political involvement risky. Critics warned that Musk’s power in Washington could blur ethical lines. The blowback may have played a role in his decision to pull back.

    Musk’s Political Bets Did Not Pay Off

    Despite spending hundreds of millions, Musk failed to achieve many of his goals. His push to influence spending through Doge produced few results. The program faced limits in power and has fallen short of the massive savings Musk once promised.

    “We are simply the adviser,” Musk said at the conference. “In that context we are doing very well.” Still, public reports suggest Doge’s cuts harmed U.S.-funded programs like HIV/AIDS prevention. Musk rejected those findings but admitted the criticism hit hard. “I took it personally,” he said.

    He also failed to win key elections. In Wisconsin, Musk backed a conservative candidate for the state Supreme Court. Despite a $20 million investment from Musk-backed groups, the candidate lost.

    And while Musk stood with Trump during the campaign, the former president didn’t always listen. Trump pushed ahead with tariffs that Musk opposed.

    A Strategic Return to Tesla

    With his political spending under fire and his influence fading, Musk is shifting gears. He’s refocusing on Tesla, the company that made him a household name. At the Qatar conference, he committed to leading Tesla for another five years.

    This move is likely to calm shareholders and rebuild consumer trust. Investors have long worried that Musk’s political activities distracted from Tesla’s growth and innovation. By cutting back on political donations, Musk could reduce controversy and protect his businesses.

    Musk’s retreat from politics doesn’t mean he’s out forever. But for now, he’s signaling a clear pivot. The message is simple: Elon Musk spending will now be about cars, rockets, and tech—not campaigns.

  • Outrage as Cooperatives PS Kilemi Skips Critical Budget Session for Nanyuki Retreat

    Outrage as Cooperatives PS Kilemi Skips Critical Budget Session for Nanyuki Retreat

    Nairobi, May 20, 2025 – Members of Parliament have expressed outrage after Cooperatives Principal Secretary Patrick Kilemi failed to attend a crucial budget session, opting instead for an in-house staff retreat in Nanyuki.

    The absence has triggered sharp criticism from legislators who claim Kilemi is sidestepping essential duties during a critical period.

    The parliamentary session, scheduled for the last week of May, was intended to establish timelines for reviewing Budget estimates—a vital process as the 2025/26 Financial Year approaches.

    Kilemi’s absence left several MPs, including Aldai’s Marianne Kitany and Ikolomani’s Bernard Shinali, questioning his commitment to transparency and fiscal accountability.

    “The worst of all this is those saying they want to come at the end of May, yet they know we have timelines. How is this even possible?” Shinali remarked during the session.

    Kitany reinforced this concern, questioning whether the state department truly comprehends the budgeting process and the implications of their absence.

    Inside sources confirmed that Kilemi was attending a performance targets retreat in Nanyuki despite his prior commitment to Parliament.

    A formal communication from David K. Obonyo, dated May 12, stated Kilemi would be unavailable until late May, further intensifying parliamentary frustration.

    The National Assembly had requested Kilemi’s attendance by May 6 to discuss his appearance before the Ministries, Departments, and Agencies (MDAs) scheduled for May 13.

    Legislators argued that Kilemi’s absence seriously compromises the budget process, particularly as several ministries have yet to defend their budgets before committees.

    Shinali deemed it “unacceptable” that officials would prioritize administrative retreats over constitutional parliamentary obligations, especially during the critical budget deliberation period.

    Vihiga Woman Representative Beatrice Adagala accused the Principal Secretary of dismissive behavior toward the committee, highlighting his frequent travels despite budget constraints from the previous financial year.

    “He risks not having more funds to continue treating the committee in such a manner,” she cautioned.

  • ‪Court Blocks IEBC Reconstitution, Stops Vetting of Ruto’s Nominees ‬

    ‪Court Blocks IEBC Reconstitution, Stops Vetting of Ruto’s Nominees ‬

    NAIROBI – The High Court has temporarily halted the reconstitution of Kenya’s electoral body after issuing orders stopping the National Assembly from vetting nominees to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC).

    Justice Lawrence Mugambi issued the temporary injunction on Monday following a petition filed by activists Kelvin Roy Omondi and Boniface Mwangi, who challenged the constitutionality and legality of President William Ruto’s nominees for the positions of chairperson and commissioners.

    The court order will remain in effect until May 29, 2025, when the case will be heard further.

    Constitutional concerns

    Represented by prominent lawyer Paul Muite, the petitioners argued that the selection process violated several constitutional provisions, including Articles 10, 27(1), 232, and 250 of the Constitution.

    “We do not wish the justice system here again to undermine our people; it is therefore critical and vital that care be taken in the manner in which we go forward in the future; that is something that the panel failed to do,” Muite told the court.

    The activists claim the public participation conducted during the selection process was inadequate, with citizens lacking sufficient information about how candidates were selected.

    Allegations of impropriety

    According to court documents, the petitioners allege that certain candidates were “sneaked in” to the shortlist under unclear circumstances.

    They further contend that some nominees who scored poorly in interviews were inexplicably selected, while others facing integrity questions were included in the final list.

    The petition specifically notes that while several applicants were originally shortlisted and interviewed, Hassan Noor Hassan was excluded from the initial shortlist.

    The activists claim the subsequent selection process lacked transparency.

    Diversity requirements unfulfilled

    A key argument in the petition is that the nominations failed to meet constitutional requirements for regional and ethnic balance.

    The petitioners highlighted that the list of nominees did not include any persons with disabilities, which they argue violates constitutional provisions on inclusivity.

    “The list containing the nominated chairperson and commissioners for the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission is unconstitutional and illegal, as it is discriminatory and failed to include any person with a disability,” the petition states.

    President William Ruto with IEBC selection panel Chair Nelson Makanda when he received the report on the recruitment of nominees to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) on May 6, 2025.
    President William Ruto with IEBC selection panel Chair Nelson Makanda when he received the report on the recruitment of nominees to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) on May 6, 2025.

    President William Ruto received the IEBC selection panel’s report on May 6, 2025, from panel Chair Nelson Makanda. The commission’s reconstitution comes as Kenya prepares for its next electoral cycle, with the IEBC playing a crucial role in managing the country’s democratic processes.

    The current legal challenge marks another episode in Kenya’s often contentious electoral management history, with the IEBC frequently finding itself at the center of legal disputes.

    The case will continue on May 29, when the court will hear further arguments on whether to extend the injunction or allow the vetting process to proceed.

  • UDA Expels Senator Orwoba, Moves To Replace Her In Senate

    UDA Expels Senator Orwoba, Moves To Replace Her In Senate

    Nairobi, Kenya May 19 – The United Democratic Alliance (UDA) has expelled Nominated Senator Gloria Orwoba from the party with immediate effect, following a decision ratified by the party’s top organs on Monday.

    The party has also written to the Speaker of the Senate to initiate the process of her removal from Parliament.

    In a formal statement issued by UDA Secretary General Hassan Omar, the party cited disciplinary breaches and disloyalty to party ideals as the basis for the expulsion.

    Orwoba’s recent political dalliance with former Interior Cabinet Secretary Dr. Fred Matiang’i a key opposition figure and 2027 presidential hopeful is widely seen as having sealed her fate within the ruling party.

    “Pursuant to Article 29 of the UDA Party Constitution, and having exhaustively deliberated on the matters before it, the Party’s Disciplinary Committee has resolved that Sen. Gloria Orwoba be expelled from the membership of the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) Party with immediate effect,” said Omar.

    As part of the procedure, UDA has notified the Speaker of the Senate, the Registrar of Political Parties (RPP), and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) about Orwoba’s expulsion.

    The party has also moved to replace her in the Senate.

    “In accordance with the Party’s Nomination Rules and based on the Party List submitted to the IEBC prior to the 2022 General Elections, the Party has nominated Mrs. Consolata Wabwire Wakwabubi from Kimilili Constituency, Bungoma County to fill the resulting vacancy,” said Omar.

    He added that the National Executive Committee (NEC) met on May 19, 2025, and unanimously adopted the decision of the Disciplinary Committee, effectively stripping Orwoba of her party membership and privileges.

    “Accordingly, Sen. Gloria Orwoba ceases to be a member of the UDA Party. Consequently, she no longer enjoys any privileges accorded to party members nor is she authorized to represent or act on behalf of the Party in any capacity,” the statement read.

    While reaffirming its commitment to democratic rights, UDA emphasized that party loyalty and discipline remain non-negotiable.

    “While the UDA Party upholds the values of freedom of expression and association as enshrined in the Constitution of Kenya 2010, fidelity and loyalty to Party ideals are fundamental to its constitution,”
    “.. and to further consolidate our multiparty politics by strengthening political parties. Hon. Gloria Orwoba cannot therefore continue to play for two political teams simultaneously,” the statement read.

  • You Know Where to Find Me, Gachagua Dares Govt To Arrest Him

    You Know Where to Find Me, Gachagua Dares Govt To Arrest Him

    NAIROBI — Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP) leader Rigathi Gachagua has openly challenged the government to arrest him if they believe he has committed any crime, condemning what he described as intimidation tactics following reports that security officers surrounded his homes on Sunday.

    “The drama of waylaying us on roads must stop. If the government knows that I have committed a crime under the laws of Kenya, and it is identified in the penal code, they know all my homes. They don’t need to waylay me on the road,” Gachagua declared during a press conference in Nairobi on Monday.

    The former Deputy President, who was impeached in October 2024, claimed that officers who surrounded his Wamunyoro and Karen residences on Sunday had planned to plant weapons on his convoy.

    His lawyer, Ndegwa Njiru, was the first to reveal the presence of security personnel around Gachagua’s properties.

    “It was my responsibility to put up a team of civilian firearm holders to escort me, and it is not illegal or wrong,” Gachagua stated, defending his decision to maintain private security following the withdrawal of his official protection detail after his impeachment last year.

    Wiper Party leader Kalonzo Musyoka has expressed solidarity with Gachagua, condemning the government’s actions.

    “This intimidation of the Opposition must stop. Mr. Ruto, if you want to arrest Deputy President @rigathi, do it the right way; follow the law,” Musyoka said on Sunday.

    The tension follows the recent launch of Gachagua’s new DCP party in Lavington, which descended into chaos after alleged goons disrupted the event.

    Several attendees, including journalists, were reportedly injured in the melee.

    Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen has stated that investigations are underway to identify plain-clothes firearm holders seen firing shots during the incident.

    Gachagua’s outspoken criticism of the Kenya-Kwanza administration has put him at odds with pro-government politicians, with some openly calling for his arrest.

    Belgut MP Nelson Koech, who chairs the National Assembly committee on defense, intelligence, and foreign relations, suggested that Gachagua’s arrest is inevitable.

    “The statements that he continues to issue are extremely dangerous to this country. It is not a matter of if, it is a matter of when he will be arrested,” Koech said during a television interview on Monday.

  • State to Arrest Gachagua Over Gen Z Protests

    State to Arrest Gachagua Over Gen Z Protests

    NAIROBI — Security forces surrounded the residences of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua on Sunday night, as the government moved to arrest him over alleged involvement in last year’s deadly “Occupy Parliament” protests, according to Belgut MP Nelson Koech.

    Speaking during a Monday morning interview on Citizen TV, MP Koech claimed that Gachagua, along with several unnamed members of parliament, is facing imminent charges related to the June 25, 2024, protests that saw demonstrators storm Parliament.

    “Rigathi Gachagua, as we are talking right now, including a few members of parliament, are about to be charged for what happened last year on June 25. The invasion of parliament and the chaos after, and the act itself, include Rigathi Gachagua,” Koech stated.

    The move comes days after Gachagua made controversial statements about the upcoming 2027 general elections, warning that any attempt to manipulate the electoral process could lead to violence worse than the 2007/2008 post-election crisis that claimed over 1,000 lives.

    “With the mood in the country, if that IEBC tries to mess with the elections, there will be no country here. I want to tell you that 2007 will look like a Christmas party,” Gachagua reportedly said on Friday, referring to the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission.

    Belgut MP Nelson Koech.
    Belgut MP Nelson Koech.

    Koech alleged that authorities view Gachagua as a threat because of his inflammatory rhetoric.

    “When he issues another statement, it is not taken lightly because this is someone who has the capability of causing chaos, not by any power that he has, but through his tongue,” he said.

    Government officials, including Deputy President Kithure Kindiki and Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen, have publicly denounced Gachagua’s remarks, promising legal action against anyone threatening peace during the upcoming elections.

    Gachagua has since attempted to clarify his statements, claiming they were taken out of context.

    “I never said there would be chaos in Kenya. What I said is that, according to the concerns being raised by Kenyans, there must be no attempts to rig the elections—so that we avoid a repeat of the tragic events of 2007/2008,” he explained during a church service in Murang’a County on Sunday.

    By Sunday night, police had surrounded Gachagua’s homes in both Karen, Nairobi, and in Nyeri County, according to reports.

    The June 2024 “Gen Z” protests, which the government is now linking to Gachagua, saw young Kenyans storm Parliament buildings in demonstrations that turned violent, resulting in multiple casualties.

    The potential arrest of Gachagua comes amid heightened political tensions in the region, highlighted by the recent deportation of opposition figure Martha Karua from neighboring Tanzania, where she was attempting to attend court proceedings for Tanzanian opposition politician Tundu Lissu.

    Koech, who also chairs the Foreign Relations Committee, commented on Karua’s deportation during the same interview, suggesting she should “focus on Kenya” rather than involving herself in matters across East Africa.

  • Gachagua Goes into Hiding as Police Steps Up Manhunt for His Arrest

    Gachagua Goes into Hiding as Police Steps Up Manhunt for His Arrest

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has reportedly gone into hiding as police intensify their search for him in what government officials describe as a crackdown on incitement to violence, while opposition figures condemn the move as political intimidation.

    According to sources close to the matter, Gachagua evaded a police dragnet in Murang’a County on Sunday evening before making his way to his Wamunyoro home in Nyeri. Law enforcement officers have since laid siege to both his Nyeri and Karen residences in Nairobi.

    “To all media houses, kindly be informed that the DCI has taken hostage of all HE Rigathi Gachagua’s homes both at Karen and at Wamunyoro. They are currently man hunting him. We are yet to be informed of the reasons,” said Ndegwa Njiru, one of Gachagua’s lawyers.

    The manhunt follows a series of stern warnings from top government officials, including Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen and Deputy President Kithure Kindiki, who have accused the former deputy president of making inflammatory statements that could destabilize the country.

    Interior CS Kipchumba Murkomen.
    Interior CS Kipchumba Murkomen.

    “We will put you in jail, and there’s nothing you’ll do about it,” Murkomen declared during a public event in Nandi County over the weekend. “We won’t allow anyone to burn it (the country) down.”

    Deputy President Kindiki echoed these sentiments, comparing leaders who fan violent rhetoric to Al-Shabaab terrorists.

    “Our country is not at risk of experiencing pre- or post-election violence similar to that witnessed in 2007/08. Those prophesying such occurrences are the real enemies of Kenyans and should be rejected at all costs,” said Kindiki during an interdenominational church service in Teso North.

    Controversial statements

    The confrontation stems from recent comments made by Gachagua regarding the 2027 general elections.

    The former deputy president, who was impeached last October after serving for two years in the role, allegedly warned that Kenya could experience violence worse than the 2007/08 post-election crisis if the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) mishandles the upcoming polls.

    “If the IEBC tries to mess with the 2027 election there will be no country here, 2007 will look like a Christmas Party,” Gachagua reportedly stated in a recent media interview.

    The 2007/08 post-election violence left more than 1,000 people dead and thousands displaced from their homes, marking one of the darkest chapters in Kenya’s political history.

    In response to the threats of arrest, Gachagua has defended his statements, insisting that he was not inciting violence but merely warning about potential consequences.

    “I did not order anyone to arms. I abhor violence and instability. I am only warning IEBC that our politics are fluid. It is my civic duty to caution. The situation we are in now won’t stomach electoral monkey business in 2027,” Gachagua said on Sunday.

    The former deputy president further accused the current administration of hypocrisy, claiming that it is the government that has been “on a spree of unleashing goons in burials, weddings, worship centers.”

    He specifically pointed to recent disruptions during the launch of his new political party, Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP).

    Wiper leader Kalonzo Musyoka has condemned the government’s actions against Gachagua, terming them as intimidation.

    “This intimidation of the Opposition must stop. Mr. Ruto, if you want to arrest Deputy President @rigathi, do it the right way; follow the law. We are prepared to produce DP Gachagua before the @DCI_Kenya. Please stop abducting Kenyans and their leaders. Abductions are primitive and cowardly,” Musyoka stated.

    The confrontation highlights the growing political tensions in Kenya as the country moves toward the 2027 general elections.

    Gachagua, who recently launched his Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP), has positioned himself as a key opposition figure against President William Ruto’s administration, his former ally.

    Government officials maintain that their actions are aimed at preventing incitement and preserving peace, while opposition figures view the moves as attempts to suppress political dissent.

    As the manhunt continues, the political landscape remains tense, with both sides digging in on their positions.

  • “You Are Not Untouchable,” CS Murkomen Warns Leaders Fueling Violence Amid Gachagua’s Inflammatory Election Statements

    “You Are Not Untouchable,” CS Murkomen Warns Leaders Fueling Violence Amid Gachagua’s Inflammatory Election Statements

    Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen has issued a stern warning to political leaders engaging in incitement and violence, declaring that no one is “untouchable” regardless of their political stature or former government positions.

    The warning comes just days after former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua made controversial statements regarding the 2027 elections, suggesting potential violence if the IEBC “forces” President William Ruto on Kenyans.

    Speaking at Nuru Africa Inland Church in Kitale, Trans Nzoia County on Sunday, CS Murkomen directed county security teams to crack down on politicians who engage in “goonism, violence and ethnic division.”

    “We are committed to ensuring a peaceful and secure nation for all and will not be threatened by anyone thinking we will spare them because of their position,” Murkomen stated.

    “Under my watch, we will not condone anyone who seeks to burn down our nation. We will do everything under the sun to keep our country safe.”

    While not mentioning Gachagua by name, Murkomen’s comments appear to address recent statements from political figures who have made threatening remarks about Kenya’s political stability.

    “There are those threatening our peace, thinking they are untouchable, thinking they are above the law because of their former senior positions in government,” the Interior CS said, in what observers view as a veiled reference to the former Deputy President.

    Gachagua’s warning

    Rigathi Gachagua.
    Rigathi Gachagua.

    Just two days earlier, on Friday, former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua warned the incoming Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) commissioners about the 2027 general elections during an interview at his Wamunyoro home.

    “I want to implore those commissioners to be Kenyans, to be patriotic, and not to attempt to force William Ruto on the people of Kenya. It will not work, and the people of Kenya will not accept it,” Gachagua said.

    In a statement that has raised concerns about potential instability, Gachagua added, “the mood in the country is that if the IEBC tries to mess with the elections, there would be no country here; 2007 would look like a Christmas party.”

    The former Deputy President, who recently launched his Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), also spoke about the “Gen Z wave” as an “unstoppable movement” that would ensure Ruto becomes a one-term president.

    President’s call

    Ruto during the groundbreaking ceremony of the proposed new Narok International Airport.
    Ruto during the groundbreaking ceremony of the proposed new Narok International Airport.

    President William Ruto has urged his opponents to focus on delivering their promises to Kenyans rather than engaging in early politicking.

    During a development tour at the coast on Friday, the President stated, “When the time for campaigns begins, all of you will determine because you are the masters of voting.

    People shall be voted in or out based on the work they have done for you and not the number of insults spewed.”

    As political tensions appear to rise well ahead of the 2027 elections, the government has made it clear that it will not tolerate politically instigated violence or ethnic incitement, regardless of who is behind it.

  • Ruto’s Net Worth is Between Sh3-4 Trillion, Gachagua Claims

    Ruto’s Net Worth is Between Sh3-4 Trillion, Gachagua Claims

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has launched a fresh and scathing attack on President William Ruto, accusing him of amassing massive personal wealth through alleged corruption during his two-year tenure at the helm of government.

    Speaking during an interview with Obinna Online TV on Friday night, Gachagua claimed that President Ruto has accumulated a staggering Sh3 to 4 trillion in personal wealth since assuming office in September 2022.

    “In my estimation, in the last two years, he (Ruto) must have made between Ksh3 to 4 trillion. He is filthy rich. I think that was his dream. I do not think he cares about this country,” Gachagua said during the explosive interview.

    The former deputy president alleged that Ruto’s main concern since taking power has not been leadership or delivering on campaign promises, but self-enrichment.

    He accused the Head of State of prioritizing personal gain over the interests of the nation and claimed that public resources were being diverted into secretive and questionable financial schemes.

    Housing Levy funds allegedly redirected

    Rigathi when he appeared on the Obinna TV Show.
    Rigathi when he appeared on the Obinna TV Show.

    In a shocking allegation, Gachagua claimed that Ruto had acquired a commercial bank and was using it to siphon excess funds from the controversial Housing Fund Levy.

    “He has bought a bank where the excess Housing Levy is being channeled to. The bank has taken all government businesses from other banks such as Equity and Co-operative,” he alleged.

    While Gachagua did not name the bank in question, his comments suggest a deliberate re-routing of public funds from established financial institutions into a private entity allegedly linked to the President.

    The Housing Fund Levy, introduced under the Kenya Kwanza administration, has been the subject of intense public debate, with critics accusing the government of imposing a burdensome tax without clear accountability mechanisms.

    Gachagua’s claim that the excess levy is being funneled into a bank controlled by the President is likely to further fuel demands for transparency and accountability.

    Betrayal

    Despite their former alliance, Gachagua spoke bitterly about his broken relationship with Ruto. He revealed that although they are now politically estranged, he still keeps pictures of the President in his home — a constant reminder, he said, of betrayal.

    “I still have his photos in my house. They remind me of betrayal,” he said during the interview, suggesting deep personal hurt over their political fallout.

    Gachagua has in recent months been positioning himself as a vocal critic of the Ruto administration. On Thursday, 14 May, he announced the formation of a new political outfit, the Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP). The party, which he insists is a grassroots movement rather than a personal vehicle, has reportedly gained significant traction.

    “This is a peoples’ party. It is not my party. I will not fund it…I even don’t have the resources to fund it. So far, we have received over Sh100 million as support from different Kenyans,” he disclosed.

    The revelation of the party’s fundraising success appears to be an attempt by Gachagua to distance himself from the elite-driven politics he accuses Ruto of embodying. He framed the contributions as a sign of ordinary Kenyans’ desire for change and resistance to what he described as an administration driven by greed and impunity.

  • ‘Do Not Start a War, Focus on Your Political Age Mates Like Ichungwa, I’m Your Senior,’ Kuria Warns Gachagua

    ‘Do Not Start a War, Focus on Your Political Age Mates Like Ichungwa, I’m Your Senior,’ Kuria Warns Gachagua

    A political confrontation has erupted between President William Ruto’s Senior Economic Adviser Moses Kuria and former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, with Kuria warning Gachagua against starting a political war he “cannot win.”

    The exchange began when Gachagua, addressing supporters in Kangema, Murang’a County on Saturday, claimed that Kuria’s Chama Cha Kazi (CCK) party was among several political outfits allegedly controlled by President Ruto, whom he referred to as “Kasongo.”

    “Kasongo has planned to launch many parties, Moses Kuria’s party is his, that of Kiunjuri is also his, and that of William Kabogo. He is further planning to start two new parties here in Murang’a,” Gachagua told his supporters.

    The remarks prompted a swift and stern response from Kuria, who took to social media to defend his party’s independence and remind Gachagua of their political history.

    “I formed Chama Cha Kazi in August 2021. We have elected MCAs in several counties including Nairobi, Kiambu, Nyandarua and Embu,” Kuria stated, emphasizing that CCK is a legitimate national outfit with elected officials across multiple counties.

    In his pointed rebuke, Kuria recalled how he had attempted to convince Gachagua before the 2022 elections that they should approach Ruto with their own political parties, similar to the strategy employed by Musalia Mudavadi, Moses Wetangula, Alfred Mutua, and Amason Kingi.

    “You refused and on Live TV you called my party a briefcase party. You said we should trust William Ruto unconditionally,” Kuria wrote, suggesting that Gachagua had undermined him and other CCK candidates during that period.

    The tension between the two Mt. Kenya leaders appears to stem from their differing approaches to regional politics, with Kuria accusing Gachagua of trying to “vandalize parties we have nurtured for 4 years when you were blindly in love with William Ruto.”

    Kuria concluded his statement with a warning that has now become the talk of political circles: “Do not start a war you cannot win. Focus on your political age mates like Kimani Ichungwa. I am your political senior my friend. Respect your elders.”

    The exchange shows growing divisions within the Mt. Kenya political landscape, where various leaders are positioning themselves ahead of future electoral contests.

  • Former Senior State Official Files ICC Complaint Against Interior CS Murkomen

    Former Senior State Official Files ICC Complaint Against Interior CS Murkomen

    A former high-ranking Kenyan government official has taken unprecedented action by filing a formal complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC) against Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen over controversial political statements regarding the 2027 presidential election.

    Dr. Peter Mbae, who previously served as Head of Government Delivery Services, has petitioned the Hague-based tribunal to investigate remarks made by CS Murkomen on April 14, in which he allegedly declared that President William Ruto would be re-elected in 2027 “under all circumstances.”

    In his petition to the ICC prosecutor, Dr. Mbae expressed grave concern that such statements could potentially incite political tensions and lead to electoral violence similar to what Kenya experienced following the disputed 2007 presidential election.

    “This letter has been officially forwarded to the ICC prosecutor requesting prompt and urgent intervention to examine the Kenyan situation,” Dr. Mbae stated in his petition.

    “It is imperative to take action now to avert a recurrence of the 2007 post-election violence.”

    Dr. Mbae’s actions reflect growing apprehension within certain political circles about rhetoric that may undermine electoral integrity as Kenya approaches its next general election.

    Ex-Government Delivery Chief Peter Mbae Files ICC Complaint Against CS Murkomen.
    Former Government Delivery Chief Peter Mbae.

    His petition specifically highlights Murkomen’s reference to the 2007 presidential election, a poll that triggered widespread violence resulting in over 1,000 deaths and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Kenyans.

    In a separate communication addressed to the Ministry of Interior on April 16, Dr. Mbae directly challenged CS Murkomen’s widely broadcast remarks.

    “The statement was to the effect that the outcome of the 2027 Presidential Election is predetermined and that President Ruto will win under all circumstances,” Dr. Mbae wrote, adding that such assertions could only lead to the conclusion that “the current administration shall employ all means possible to ensure the outcome is as stated by the Cabinet Secretary.”

    Dr. Mbae has called on CS Murkomen to publicly reaffirm the government’s commitment to conducting free, fair, and transparent elections in 2027.

    He also urged state authorities to provide assurances that Kenyan citizens will be able to participate in the process without fear of violence, intimidation, or suppression.

    The former official maintains that ICC intervention at this early stage could serve as a crucial deterrent against potential human rights violations and crimes against humanity as Kenya prepares for its next electoral cycle.

  • ‘2007 Will Be Like A Christmas Party’: Gachagua Urges IEBC to Respect Voters’ Will, Warns of Potential PEV in 2027

    ‘2007 Will Be Like A Christmas Party’: Gachagua Urges IEBC to Respect Voters’ Will, Warns of Potential PEV in 2027

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has cautioned that any attempt to manipulate the 2027 presidential election results could trigger civil unrest surpassing the 2007 post-election violence.

    Speaking from his Wamunyoro home on Friday, Gachagua directly addressed incoming Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) commissioners, urging them to prioritize patriotism over political allegiance.

    “I want to implore those commissioners to be Kenyans, to be patriotic, and not to attempt to force William Ruto on the people of Kenya. It will not work, and the people of Kenya will not accept it,” Gachagua stated.

    In his most pointed comment, Gachagua referenced Kenya’s darkest electoral chapter, warning that “if the IEBC tries to mess with the elections, there would be no country here; 2007 would look like a Christmas party.”

    The 2007-2008 post-election violence claimed over 1,100 lives and displaced hundreds of thousands after disputed results between Mwai Kibaki and Raila Odinga.

    The Gen Z factor

    Gen Z protests in Kenya.
    Gen Z protests in Kenya.

    Gachagua highlighted what he describes as an “unstoppable” Gen Z movement that could determine President Ruto’s fate in the upcoming election.

    “This Gen Z group is lethal; this group is not tribal, cannot be compromised, cannot be bribed with Ksh200,” Gachagua observed, adding that young voters are actively obtaining identification cards to register as voters.

    The former deputy president, who has launched his Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), appears to be positioning himself as a challenger by consolidating support in the Mount Kenya region while seeking alliances with opposition leaders.

    President William Ruto, while touring development projects at the coast, seemed to respond indirectly to the political tension by calling for a focus on governance rather than campaigning.

    “When the time for campaigns begins, all of you will determine because you are the masters of voting,” Ruto said at the Galana-Kulalu irrigation scheme.

    “People shall be voted in or out based on the work they have done for you and not the number of insults spewed.”

    The president emphasized that the current period should be dedicated to development, stating, “During that time, we shall engage in a political contest, but for now, let us focus on delivering on our mandate.”

    With two years remaining before the next presidential election, the exchange signals an early start to what could be a contentious electoral period in Kenya’s democratic journey.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Former Deputy President Gachagua Keeps Ruto’s Portrait as “Reminder of Betrayal

    Former Deputy President Gachagua Keeps Ruto’s Portrait as “Reminder of Betrayal

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua revealed he continues to display photographs with President William Ruto in his home months after his contentious impeachment.

    Speaking candidly in a Friday interview on ObinnaTV, Gachagua explained his unusual decision as a deliberate reminder of political betrayal and a lesson in caution for future alliances.

    “Those pictures of William Ruto were taken in this house,” Gachagua said, describing how the President was once a “frequent visitor” who enjoyed meals prepared by his wife, Pastor Dorcas.

    “We took those pictures outside here the many times he kept coming looking for my friendship, my support, and bonding so that I could support him to become president.”

    Rather than removing the photos after their relationship soured, Gachagua made a conscious choice to preserve them.

    “When he betrayed me in such a vicious manner by mobilizing Members of Parliament (to impeach me), I decided that his picture should stay there,” he explained. “When I see him, I remember about betrayal.”

    The former Deputy President said the experience has fundamentally changed his approach to political relationships.

    “When people come here, I look at them closely. I look for possible betrayers. I’m very careful,” he stated.

    “His picture there is a constant reminder for me to be careful. That picture will remain there forever, for the rest of my life.”

    Gachagua expressed regret about entering a political alliance without formal documentation, having been persuaded by what he now views as performative gestures.

    “I went into an arrangement with this guy without writing anything. I believed him because he would come here and pray for us, and there is a pastor in this house. The guy would even come here and cry,” he recounted.

    The impeached deputy also claimed the relationship with Ruto forced him to abandon his longstanding connection with former President Uhuru Kenyatta, whom he had served for years as a personal assistant.

    Looking ahead, Gachagua vowed to approach future political deals with greater caution, insisting on legal documentation and witnesses—clear lessons from what he characterizes as a profound political betrayal that continues to shape his outlook.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Gachagua Accuses NIS Chief Haji of Misleading President Ruto with ‘Doctored’ Intelligence

    Gachagua Accuses NIS Chief Haji of Misleading President Ruto with ‘Doctored’ Intelligence

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has intensified his criticism of Noordin Haji, the Director General of the National Intelligence Service (NIS), accusing him of providing President William Ruto with “doctored intelligence” that has led to misguided decisions and contributed to the president’s declining popularity.

    In an interview on the popular ObinnaTV podcast on Friday, Gachagua described the NIS as “dysfunctional” and claimed Haji manipulates intelligence to present an overly positive picture of public sentiment.

    “I speak with intelligence officers across the country who report raw data showing public hostility toward the administration,” Gachagua said.

    “But Noordin’s daily briefs to the president suggest everything is fine, which is far from the truth.”

    Gachagua cited the 2024 Finance Bill protests as an example, claiming he warned Ruto against pushing the bill due to widespread opposition but was ignored in favor of Haji’s advice.

    “The protests caught the president by surprise because he trusted Noordin over my counsel,” he alleged. Gachagua further described Haji as a “businessman” prioritizing personal deals, including with the Adani Group, over national interests, though he provided no evidence to support this claim.

    The former deputy president also questioned Haji’s qualifications, linking Ruto’s waning public support to the NIS chief’s alleged misguidance.

    “Two years ago, Ruto was a beloved leader. Now everywhere you go, people are chanting ‘Ruto must go,’” Gachagua said. “I told the president that Noordin is not fit for this role.”

    Gachagua’s allegations echo his earlier criticisms of Haji, notably during the 2024 Finance Bill protests, when he accused the NIS of failing to anticipate public unrest.

    At the time, he also claimed Haji falsely linked him and former President Uhuru Kenyatta to the protests, an accusation Haji dismissed as baseless.

    These repeated claims suggest Gachagua may be targeting Haji to undermine Ruto’s inner circle, possibly to bolster his own influence in the Mount Kenya region, where he retains significant support among the Kikuyu community.

    However, Gachagua’s accusations lack specific evidence.

    He provided no examples of falsified intelligence or documentation to substantiate his claims, raising questions about their credibility.

    His history of inflammatory statements since his October 2024 impeachment, including unsubstantiated allegations in April 2025 that Ruto facilitated money laundering through Nairobi, further complicates the reliability of his narrative.

    Political context

    Gachagua during his appearance on ObinnaTV from his home in Wamunyoro.
    Gachagua during his appearance on ObinnaTV from his home in Wamunyoro.

    Gachagua’s remarks come amid heightened political tensions in Kenya, with Ruto’s administration facing criticism over governance, economic challenges, and alleged human rights abuses, including reported abductions of government critics.

    Allegations of NIS involvement in cases like the 2024 abduction of cabinet minister Leslie Muturi’s son have fueled public distrust in the agency, lending some context to Gachagua’s claims of dysfunction.

    However, these issues do not directly corroborate his specific allegations of doctored intelligence.

    For Gachagua, the accusations serve to discredit Ruto’s leadership while positioning himself as a political contender ahead of future elections.

    At 59, he appears to be leveraging his Mount Kenya base to stage a comeback, though his focus on Haji, a figure from a minority community, risks accusations of tribalism, as seen in 2024 criticisms from former Mombasa Governor and now Mining Secretary Hassan Joho.

    For Ruto, the allegations challenge his administration’s cohesion.

    Haji remains a key ally, as evidenced by their January 2025 meeting amid abduction allegations.

    Haji’s 2024 statement that he reports directly to Ruto suggests Gachagua, even as deputy president, may have had limited insight into NIS operations, potentially weakening his current claims.

    The secretive nature of the NIS makes verifying claims of doctored intelligence difficult without access to classified briefings.

    While the agency’s failure to predict the scale of the 2024 protests has drawn legitimate criticism, Gachagua’s allegations remain speculative without concrete evidence.

    Watch the video below.

  • Gachagua Withdraws Petitions as Legal Focus Shifts to Post-Impeachment Case

    Gachagua Withdraws Petitions as Legal Focus Shifts to Post-Impeachment Case

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has dropped two petitions he had filed to stop his impeachment. His legal team says the cases are no longer necessary.

    This move comes as Gachagua chooses to concentrate on a more important legal battle—the post-impeachment case that could define his political future.

    The withdrawn petitions were originally aimed at blocking Parliament from kicking him out of office.

    But now, his lawyers argue that the key legal questions raised in those cases are already part of the ongoing case, making the earlier petitions irrelevant.

    Gachagua Withdraws Petitions as Legal Focus Shifts to Post-Impeachment Case
    The Gachagua petitions, once aimed at stopping his impeachment, have been withdrawn to focus on a stronger post-impeachment case. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Ex-DP Gachagua Petitions Withdrawn After Court of Appeal Ruling

    On Thursday, May 15, Gachagua’s lawyers formally asked the High Court to drop the two pre-impeachment petitions. The former deputy president filed these petitions in October last year when Parliament introduced a special motion to remove him from office on 11 charges.

    These charges ranged from abuse of office to mismanagement of public funds. Gachagua, who now leads the Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), believed the impeachment process was politically motivated. His initial legal strategy was to stop the National Assembly and Senate from debating and voting on the motion.

    However, the legal landscape changed quickly. On May 9, the Court of Appeal overturned a decision by Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu. Mwilu had appointed three judges—Eric Ogolla, Anthony Murima, and Fred Mugambi—to handle the impeachment petitions.

    Gachagua’s team opposed this, arguing that only the Chief Justice, Martha Koome, had the authority to create such a bench. The appellate court agreed with Gachagua. It ruled that the Chief Justice must personally appoint a bench to hear the case.

    With this decision, Gachagua’s lawyers saw an opportunity to streamline the legal process. They withdrew the pre-impeachment cases and instead asked the High Court to forward the post-impeachment petition to Chief Justice Koome for action.

    In their formal notice, the legal team wrote, “The conditional and legal issues raised in the above-mentioned pre-impeachment petitions are replicated in the post-impeachment petitions.” They requested the court to consider this overlap and treat the post-impeachment case as the main legal challenge going forward.

    Political Stakes Still High for Gachagua

    Even though Gachagua is no longer in office, his legal fight is far from over. The post-impeachment petition could determine whether the process that led to his removal was fair and constitutional. If the court finds faults in how Parliament handled the case, it could open the door for political or even legal consequences.

    This case is not just about Gachagua’s personal reputation. It’s about the balance of power between the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. His legal team is pushing to have a full bench hear the matter, which shows they are aiming for a thorough and transparent review.

    There’s also a wider political dimension. Since his removal, Gachagua has rebranded himself through the DCP party. Winning this case could boost his chances of a political comeback. Losing it might permanently damage his career.

    The next steps depend on Chief Justice Martha Koome. If she agrees to empanel a new bench, the post-impeachment petition will move forward. If not, Gachagua may face a longer legal battle, possibly dragging on for months.

    What the Gachagua Petitions Mean for Legal Procedure

    The withdrawal of the Gachagua petitions highlights a bigger issue—how legal procedures around impeachment are managed in Kenya. The Court of Appeal’s ruling made it clear: only the Chief Justice can appoint judges to hear such sensitive cases.

    This decision reinforces the importance of following proper legal channels, especially in high-stakes political matters. It also places more responsibility on the Chief Justice’s office. With this new precedent, other political leaders facing similar battles may look to this case as a guide.

    Whether you agree with Gachagua or not, his case is now part of a growing conversation about the independence of Kenya’s judiciary.

    His team’s move to focus on one strong petition instead of juggling multiple cases may prove to be a smarter legal strategy. It avoids confusion, reduces court delays, and allows judges to zero in on the key constitutional questions.

    As the country waits for Chief Justice Koome’s next move, one thing is clear—the outcome of the post-impeachment case could have a lasting impact on both law and politics in Kenya.

     

  • “Like a Gentleman, Just Accept That You Lost the Trust and Support of Kenyans and Move On,” Gachagua Accuses Ruto of Hiring Goons on His Party Launch

    “Like a Gentleman, Just Accept That You Lost the Trust and Support of Kenyans and Move On,” Gachagua Accuses Ruto of Hiring Goons on His Party Launch

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua launched a scathing attack against President William Ruto yesterday, accusing him of repeatedly sending “goons” to attack him, his family, and supporters during the tumultuous launch of his new political party.

    “Stop sending goons to attack me, my family, and supporters. We have rights and freedoms to enjoy like other Kenyans,” Gachagua declared during the chaotic unveiling of the Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP) in Lavington.

    The event, meant to mark Gachagua’s new political chapter, descended into violence when a large group of unidentified individuals disrupted proceedings, triggering a security incident involving Gachagua’s security detail.

    In his statement, Gachagua directly challenged President Ruto: “Like a gentleman, just accept that you lost the trust and support of the people and move on.”

    The former deputy president outlined what he described as a systematic campaign of intimidation dating back to November last year, including:

    – An attack on mourners at a funeral in Limuru allegedly carried out by “goons under police escort”
    – An assault on his wife and Christian worshippers during a prayer meeting in Nyeri
    – Police teargas deployment during a prayer meeting in Nyandarua County in December
    – The forceful eviction of his children from an office they had leased for five years
    – An attack inside a PCEA church in April, which Gachagua controversially compared to a 2007 incident

    “Today, once again, you sent goons to attack me and members of the DCP at the party headquarters,” Gachagua stated, claiming police have been prevented from arresting those responsible in each incident.

    Government Accused of Orchestrating Chaos

    Malala and Gachagua during the The Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP) launch.
    Malala and Gachagua during the The Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP) launch.

    DCP Deputy Party Leader Cleophas Malala reinforced these allegations during a May 15 interview, claiming the disruption was state-orchestrated.

    “We notified the police of the launch because you can’t launch a political party in secrecy,” Malala explained. “That group was planned and sent by the government because the government is paranoid.”

    Malala questioned how such a large disruption could occur without any police investigation: “How can an event be disrupted by such a large number of individuals, and to date, no police officer has come to the premises or even made a call to enquire what happened?”

    According to Malala, the government’s objective was to either prevent the party’s launch entirely or tarnish it with violence.

    “It was planned that this party should not be launched. The party must be stained with optics of chaos,” he asserted.

    Despite the disruption, Gachagua officially established the DCP party, with Malala appointed as interim deputy party leader.

    The formation of this new political entity marks a significant development in Kenya’s political landscape, representing a formal break between Gachagua and Ruto’s administration.

  • U.S. Senators Question Kenya’s Allegiance After Ruto’s China Visit

    U.S. Senators Question Kenya’s Allegiance After Ruto’s China Visit

    U.S. lawmakers are raising concerns over Kenya’s foreign policy orientation following President William Ruto’s recent visit to China, which has sparked debate in the Senate about Nairobi’s loyalty to Washington.

    During an official trip to Beijing last month at the invitation of Chinese President Xi Jinping, Ruto hailed China and Kenya as “co-architects of a new world order,” positioning the two nations as strategic partners beyond trade.

    The remarks have unsettled some U.S. senators, particularly in light of rising geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China.

    On Tuesday, Senator Jim Risch, the top Republican on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, criticized Ruto’s comments, suggesting they signaled a shift in allegiance.

    “Just last month, President Ruto declared that Kenya, a major non-NATO ally, and China are ‘co-architects of a new world order.’ That’s not just alignment to China; it’s allegiance,” he said. “It’s time to reassess our relationship with Kenya and others who forge tight bonds with China.”

    Ruto’s remarks came less than a year after a high-profile state visit to Washington, where President Joe Biden designated Kenya a major non-NATO ally, a move that granted Nairobi special access to U.S. military support, training, and defense financing.

    Kenya has also long been a key counterterrorism partner in the Horn of Africa, working closely with the U.S. in operations targeting al-Shabaab in Somalia.

    While U.S.-Kenya relations have historically been strong, Risch warned that America must be “clear-eyed” about its partnerships.

    He argued that Washington’s engagement with Africa should prioritize institutions, private sector ties, and youth empowerment over reliance on individual leaders.

    “Relying on leaders who embrace Beijing so openly is an error,” Risch said, cautioning that U.S. efforts to fight terrorism and promote trade on the continent “cannot be soiled” by what he sees as questionable allegiances.

    Ruto, however, has defended Kenya’s balanced diplomatic stance. Since assuming office in 2022, he has emphasized a “forward-facing” foreign policy, stating that Kenya seeks to work with both East and West. He likened his China visit to his earlier Washington trip, framing Kenya as a bridge between global powers amid deepening geopolitical divisions.

    China remains Kenya’s largest trading partner and top source of imports, while Kenya is China’s biggest trade partner in East Africa. The two nations have collaborated extensively on infrastructure and trade initiatives.

    As U.S.-China rivalry continues to shape international alliances, Ruto’s dual-track diplomacy has placed Kenya in the middle of a growing debate over influence in Africa, one that may test the future of its partnerships with both Washington and Beijing.

  • Gachagua Launches Democracy for Citizens Party, Names Its Top Leadership ‬Including Malala

    Gachagua Launches Democracy for Citizens Party, Names Its Top Leadership ‬Including Malala

    NAIROBI, May 15, 2025 – Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has officially launched the Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), marking a significant step in his political roadmap to challenge President William Ruto in the 2027 General Election.

    The launch, held in Lavington, Nairobi, saw Gachagua unveil the party’s interim leadership and debut rallying songs aimed at galvanizing support across Kenya.

    The DCP, whose slogan “Skiza Wakenya” (Listen to Kenyans) emphasizes responsiveness to citizens’ needs, has submitted its leadership roster to the Registrar of Political Parties for ratification.

    Notably, the lineup excludes current elected leaders, signaling Gachagua’s intent to build a fresh political movement.

    Among the top appointees is former UDA Secretary General Cleophas Malala, named deputy party leader, alongside other political heavyweights from the defunct UDA and Jubilee parties.

    “This is a party for all Kenyans, built on the principles of listening, uniting, and redeeming our nation from economic oppression,” Gachagua declared during the launch.

    He outlined the DCP’s focus on addressing punitive policies, improving healthcare, and “redeeming the payslip” for struggling workers.

    Gachagua during the launch of his new party in Nairobi.
    Gachagua during the launch of his new party in Nairobi.

    The interim leadership includes former Cabinet Secretary Mithika Linturi as National Organizing Secretary, former Laikipia Woman Representative Catherine Waruguru as National Women Leader, and David Mingati from Kajiado as National Chairperson.

    Other key figures include Hezron Obanga (Interim Secretary General, Kisii), Anne Mutua (National Treasurer, Machakos), and Peter Mwathi (Deputy Chairperson, Strategy, Kiambu).

    A caucus of eminent persons will be chaired by a former Starehe MP, further strengthening the party’s structure.

    In a vibrant display of political branding, DCP introduced two rallying songs—one in Kiswahili and another in English—blending secular and gospel tones to resonate with diverse Kenyan audiences.

    The Kiswahili song features lyrics like “Komboa payslip, Okoa Wakenya, Unganisha Kenya!” (Redeem the payslip, Save Kenyans, Unite Kenya!), calling for unity against economic hardship.

    Another chant, “Uongozi wa kuaminika, tunaskiza Wakenya!” (Trustworthy leadership, we listen to Kenyans!), underscores the party’s citizen-centric message.

    Supporters also sang, “Maisha yangu ni wewe, hata kama sina pesa” (My life is you, even if I have no money), reflecting the party’s populist appeal.

    The launch contrasts sharply with the 2021 unveiling of UDA, which emphasized Christian messaging.

    Gachagua’s DCP instead blends cultural and political themes to address pressing issues like economic inequality and democratic representation.

    Political analysts view the move as a direct challenge to President Ruto’s administration, with Gachagua positioning himself as a unifying figure for disgruntled voters.

    As the 2027 election approaches, the DCP’s formation marks a bold pivot for Gachagua, whose fallout with Ruto has fueled his political reinvention.

    With a diverse leadership team and a message tailored to Kenya’s economic challenges, the DCP appears poised to reshape the country’s political landscape.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • “Where Are They?” Families Challenge Ruto’s Claim That All Abducted Gen Z Protestors Have Been Released

    “Where Are They?” Families Challenge Ruto’s Claim That All Abducted Gen Z Protestors Have Been Released

    Nearly one year after Kenya’s Gen-Z protests rocked the nation, families of missing demonstrators are challenging President William Ruto’s recent declaration that “all the people who disappeared or who were abducted, all of them have been brought back to their families and to their homes.”

    The President’s statement, made during a joint press briefing with Finnish President Alexander Stubb at State House on Monday, has reopened wounds for families who continue searching for loved ones who vanished during last year’s demonstrations.

    “I Haven’t Seen My Son Yet”

    Alice Wambui last saw her son, 27-year-old Peter Macharia, on June 24, 2024.

    For nearly a year, her life has become an endless cycle of hospital visits and police station inquiries.

    “I haven’t seen my son yet,” Wambui told a local newspaper. “When were they released?”

    The toll of searching has devastated her life. Wambui has lost jobs, moved houses, and struggled to pay rent as her days are consumed by the desperate search for her son.

    Conflicting Realities

    President Ruto’s assurance that all abducted individuals have been returned contradicts the experiences of multiple families.

    During Monday’s press conference, he stated: “I have given clarity and firm instructions that nothing of that nature will happen again. It was my commitment when I became president that extrajudicial disappearances of Kenyans will not be part of what we are doing as a nation.”

    Monica Mwende, whose brother Kalani Muema was reportedly abducted in Mlolongo last December, described the President’s statement as “a wound being reopened.” Muema remains missing, with his phone switched off and no leads on his whereabouts.

    “I’ve been visiting the City Mortuary (now Nairobi Funeral Home) frequently and hospitals looking for my brother, hoping that perhaps he is among the unknown persons in these facilities,” Mwende said.

    Her mother’s health has deteriorated during the months-long search. “She hadn’t been eating,” Mwende revealed. “When she heard that President Ruto said all who had been abducted had been released, she called me to ask whether my brother had also been released.”

    Civil Society Challenges Official Narrative

    Human rights organization Vocal Africa has directly challenged the President’s claims.

    According to their records, Emmanuel Mukuria, Dennis Chege, and Peter Macharia—who disappeared on June 25, 2024—remain unaccounted for. Additionally, Martin Mbisi and Kalani Muema, reportedly abducted on December 17 in Mlolongo, are still missing.

    “These names are not isolated cases,” said Hussein Khalid of Vocal Africa. “Contrary to the President’s claim, several individuals remain unaccounted for.”

    The organization says it has documented dozens of cases through testimonies, field investigations, and partnerships with local networks, with many families living in fear amid what they describe as “a cycle of pain, silence, and official denial.”

    Alarming Statistics

    A recent report by Missing Voices, a coalition of human rights organizations, indicates Kenya recorded 55 enforced disappearance cases in 2024—a fivefold increase from 2023’s 10 cases.

    Even the state agency Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) reported 82 abduction cases since June 2024. In January, the discovery of two bodies—Justus Mutumwa Musyimi and Martin Mwau—at the Nairobi Funeral Home brought tragic closure for some families while deepening anxiety for others still searching.

    Unanswered Questions

    As the one-year mark approaches since the first wave of disappearances during the Gen-Z protests, families continue to demand answers from the government. For now, they remain caught between hope and grief, clinging to the possibility their loved ones might return.

    “If he is in your custody, dead or alive, please release him,” pleaded Mwende, referring to her missing brother who was their family’s breadwinner.

    As President Ruto faces mounting pressure over the discrepancies between his statements and families’ experiences, their question remains painfully simple: Where are our relatives?

    A 2024 report by KNCHR revealed that security forces killed at least 63 people and injured 600 others during the Gen-Z protests.