Kenya Insights

Category: Politics

  • Drama in Parliament As MPs Demand For Gachagua’s Arrest

    Drama in Parliament As MPs Demand For Gachagua’s Arrest

    Lawmakers call for former Deputy President to be declared unfit for public office over controversial 2007 violence remarks

    Chaos erupted in the National Assembly on Tuesday as furious Members of Parliament halted House proceedings to demand the immediate arrest of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua over his controversial remarks about the 2007 post-election violence.

    The dramatic scenes unfolded after Minority Leader Junet Mohamed successfully moved an adjournment motion to discuss what he termed “veiled threats” made by Gachagua during a recent television interview.

    The controversy stems from statements Gachagua made during a May 16, 2025 interview with content creator Oga Obinna, where he warned that mismanagement of the 2027 general elections could trigger violence worse than the 2007/2008 post-election crisis.

    “With the mood in the country, if the IEBC tries to mess with the elections, there will be no country here. I want to tell you, 2007 will look like a Christmas party,” Gachagua had said, referring to the crisis that claimed over 1,000 lives and displaced hundreds of thousands of Kenyans.

    The former Deputy President later attempted to clarify his remarks on May 19 during a press conference at his Karen residence, insisting his comments were not meant to incite violence but to caution the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) based on historical electoral issues.

    Parliamentary fury

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

    The mood in Parliament was explosive as lawmakers from across the political divide condemned Gachagua’s utterances as reckless and dangerous.

    South Mugirango MP Silvanus Osoro led the charge, demanding immediate action against the former Mathira legislator.

    “Gachagua should by now be behind bars for the statements; he should be charged for incitement. He should not be allowed to run up and down the country,” Osoro declared.

    National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah delivered perhaps the most scathing attack, describing Gachagua as having “a very dark soul.”

    “This is not just a man with a dark heart but a very dark soul, and a dark soul to the extent that this man believes that the death of Kenyans, the bloodshed that this country witnessed in 2007, as unfortunate as it was, that he can equate the death and bloodshed that was occasioned on innocent Kenyans as a ‘Christmas Party,’” Ichung’wah stated.

    Rarieda MP Otiende Amolo went further, urging the House to push for court proceedings to examine Gachagua’s impeachment case with a view to declaring him unfit to hold any public office.

    “I want to urge this house through its lawyers to insist to the court to go to the merit of that matter to declare whether Parliament was wrong or not including fitness to hold office,” Amolo said.

    Uriri MP Mark Nyamita expressed vindication over the earlier impeachment proceedings against Gachagua, stating: “We feel vindicated that the action we took to impeach the mistake of a deputy president that we had, we feel completely vindicated.”

    However, not all MPs joined the chorus of condemnation. Funyula MP Wilberforce Oundo defended Gachagua, describing him as merely a “messenger” warning about the need for free and fair elections.

    “Let us not kill the messenger; let us get the message. Let us prepare for the next elections,” Oundo urged his colleagues.

    National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula granted the adjournment motion and allocated one hour and thirty minutes for the debate, directing that all other House business be rescheduled to accommodate the discussion of what he termed a matter of national concern.

    Beyond parliament

    The controversy has extended beyond Parliament walls. The National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) has issued a summons to Gachagua over the utterances, which the former Deputy President has reportedly dismissed.

    Minority Leader Junet Mohamed framed the issue within constitutional parameters, noting that while Article 37 guarantees the right to peaceful assembly and demonstration, “that right ends where violence begins.”

    “No leader, including the former DP, has the right to manipulate public sentiments to incite unrest, destruction of property, or the loss of innocent lives,” Junet emphasized.

    The 2007/2008 post-election violence remains one of Kenya’s darkest chapters, triggered by disputed presidential election results. The crisis led to over 1,000 deaths, displacement of hundreds of thousands, and left deep ethnic divisions that took years to heal.

    Gachagua’s casual reference to this tragedy as a potential “Christmas party” has clearly struck a nerve among legislators who lived through or witnessed the devastating impact of that period.

    As Parliament grapples with the implications of Gachagua’s remarks, the broader question remains about the responsibility of political leaders in maintaining peace and stability, especially as the country approaches the 2027 general elections.

    The drama in Parliament reflects deeper anxieties about electoral integrity and the potential for political rhetoric to inflame tensions in a country still healing from past wounds.

    Whether legal action will follow the parliamentary condemnation remains to be seen, but Tuesday’s events have certainly placed Gachagua’s controversial remarks at the center of national political discourse.

  • MCSK Threatens Action as Gachagua Urges Public to Boycott Mt Kenya Musicians

    MCSK Threatens Action as Gachagua Urges Public to Boycott Mt Kenya Musicians

    The Music Copyright Society of Kenya (MCSK) has taken a bold stand against former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua after he called for a boycott of Mt. Kenya musicians who visited Deputy President Kithure Kindiki over the weekend.

    MCSK described Gachagua’s remarks as dangerous, divisive, and an attack on the constitutional rights of artists.

    The agency now threatens to revoke licenses for entertainment venues that heed the boycott call, warning that such actions would be treated as economic sabotage.

    MCSK Slams Gachagua for Urging Public to Boycott Mt Kenya Musicians, Calls It Economic Sabotage

    The tension began after a group of popular Mt Kenya musicians, including Samidoh Muchoki, Karangu Muraya, Ben Githae, DJ Fatxo, and Jose Gatutura, met with Deputy President Kindiki in Karen. The meeting drew instant backlash from Gachagua, who accused the artists of betraying the community and urged fans to unfollow and stop listening to their music.

    Gachagua’s remarks have since stirred controversy across the region. While addressing a crowd in Murang’a on May 25, he said the musicians must apologise to the people or face consequences. He claimed Mt Kenya elders had expressed disappointment with the artists’ choice to associate with Kindiki, a move they interpreted as political betrayal.

    But MCSK isn’t taking the threats lightly. In a hard-hitting statement seen by Kenya Insights, the agency defended the musicians’ right to associate with any leader, calling Gachagua’s boycott call an attempt to destroy livelihoods.

    “We are deeply concerned by the unfortunate calls from senior political leaders urging a boycott of our members’ work,” MCSK said. “Let it be clearly stated that MCSK will not tolerate any form of economic sabotage targeting our members.”

    The society warned entertainment venues against participating in the boycott, stating that any club, bar, or event organizer that denies artists space to perform risks losing their MCSK music licenses.

    “Public performances constitute a vital source of income for our artistes. Introducing divisive political measures that threaten this livelihood is tantamount to destroying the very foundation of their creative enterprise,” the statement added.

    MCSK further encouraged artists to remain united and avoid political manipulation, warning that leaders sowing division are harming not just the industry but the broader social fabric.

    During an address in Kabete on May 26, Kindiki called Gachagua’s comments reckless and dismissed the bribery claims, saying the artists came of their own free will to discuss ways to improve the music industry. [Photo/Courtesy]

    Gachagua Accused of Using Musicians as Political Pawns

    This is not the first time Gachagua has targeted musicians for political reasons. Critics say the former Deputy President has a pattern of rallying support through ethnic loyalty and shaming those who step out of line.

    His recent outburst came just a day after photos surfaced online of musicians meeting Kindiki in Karen, sparking speculation about shifting political alliances ahead of the 2027 elections. Gachagua immediately went on the offensive, accusing the artists of disloyalty and labeling the meeting a betrayal.

    Sources close to the musicians say the meeting with Kindiki focused on industry issues like copyright enforcement, royalties, and performance rights. But Gachagua chose to politicize the engagement, accusing Kindiki of bribing the artists with handouts—an allegation the DP has firmly denied.

    During an address in Kabete on May 26, Kindiki called Gachagua’s comments reckless and dismissed the bribery claims, saying the artists came of their own free will to discuss ways to improve the music industry.

    “They were not paid to attend. They came because they care about their industry,” Kindiki said. “Let us stop politicizing everything.”

    Musicians Call for Unity as Fans Remain Divided

    In the aftermath, the artists caught in the middle are facing intense online criticism from Gachagua’s supporters. Some fans have unfollowed them, but others continue to support the musicians, arguing that politics should not divide artists.

    “I’m a musician, not a politician,” Karangu Muraya wrote on Facebook. “I went to the meeting to speak about the challenges we face as artists, not to campaign.”

    Ben Githae, known for composing pro-government songs, also weighed in, calling for peace and urging fans not to judge artists for engaging leaders on matters affecting the entertainment sector.

    MCSK echoed these sentiments, stating that musicians play a key role in healing the country, especially at a time when political divisions are threatening national unity.

    “Their God-given talents are invaluable, especially in these times of widespread despair caused by ethnic tensions and divisive politics,” the organisation said.

    As the “Boycott Mt Kenya Musicians” row grows, it remains to be seen whether Gachagua will retract his comments or if MCSK will follow through with its threat to pull licenses from non-compliant venues.

    What’s clear is that artists are demanding respect—not just for their craft, but for their right to engage freely with any leader, regardless of political affiliations.

  • Moses Kuria Tears Into Rigathi Gachagua’s Mt Kenya Power Moves

    Moses Kuria Tears Into Rigathi Gachagua’s Mt Kenya Power Moves

    State House Senior Advisor Moses Kuria has taken off the gloves and launched a blistering attack on former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

    In a sarcastic and biting online rant, Kuria accused Gachagua of plotting to rule Mt. Kenya politics through fear, control, and intimidation.

    His comments came as Gachagua unveiled the Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), which he hopes will strengthen his political base. But Kuria sees it differently — he says it’s the rise of dictatorship.

    With sharp irony, Kuria painted Gachagua as a man obsessed with loyalty and blind obedience, warning Mt. Kenya leaders and voters not to fall for it.

    Moses Kuria Tears Into Rigathi Gachagua’s Mt Kenya Power Moves
    Moses Kuria’s outburst signals a deepening rift within the Mt Kenya leadership. As 2027 approaches, tensions are rising between those loyal to Rigathi Gachagua (pictured) and those who believe the region needs new political direction. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Moses Kuria Accuses Gachagua of Political Bullying in Mt Kenya

    Moses Kuria’s recent statements have drawn a clear battle line in Mt Kenya’s political landscape. Through a social media post titled “The Making of a Dictator”, Kuria mocked Rigathi Gachagua’s leadership style and labelled his methods as coercive and outdated.

    According to Kuria, Gachagua is pressuring Murang’a Governor Irungu Kang’ata to support the newly formed DCP or risk losing his seat in 2027. Kuria ridiculed this move, saying it reveals Gachagua’s desire to rule the region with an iron fist.

    More worrying, Kuria claims, is Gachagua’s plan to vet all DCP candidates personally. This, he argues, is a move to eliminate independent minds who don’t worship Gachagua’s style of leadership. The goal, Kuria said sarcastically, is to only allow those who submit fully to his authority to hold office.

    Kuria listed five examples to highlight Gachagua’s “authoritarian traits,” which he described with stinging mockery:

    1. Telling Governor Kang’ata he must follow orders or face political death.
    2. Personally screening all party aspirants to eliminate “uneducated” ones.
    3. Declaring all Mt Kenya parties apart from DCP as traitorous.
    4. Branding leaders who don’t follow him as “brainless.”
    5. Telling Mt Kenya musicians to only sing his praises, or be boycotted.

    Kuria ended his rant with the brutal quip, “What next… All women whose first name is not Dorcas are sellouts and will not go to heaven?”

    This pointed remark seemed to be a thinly veiled jab at Gachagua’s wife, Pastor Dorcas Gachagua, suggesting the former DP’s circle demands not just political, but personal loyalty.

     Kuria’s voice is bold, controversial, and unmistakably clear—Mt. Kenya must not fall under one man’s grip. Whether voters listen remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: Moses Kuria is not holding back. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Kuria Warns Against Gachagua’s Control Over Artists and Leaders

    Kuria didn’t stop at mocking politicians. He took direct aim at how Gachagua allegedly seeks to dominate every aspect of Mt Kenya society — including the entertainment industry. According to Kuria, Gachagua has told supporters to shun musicians who don’t publicly support him. He claims artists who refuse to sing his praise are being blacklisted from events, shows, and social platforms.

    This move, Kuria says, mirrors tactics of political strongmen who silence all forms of dissent — even in music. He called out the absurdity of trying to control musicians’ creativity and the public’s listening choices. For Kuria, it’s a dangerous sign of growing intolerance and insecurity within Gachagua’s camp.

    He warned that if such practices go unchecked, Mt Kenya risks becoming a political puppet zone, where only those loyal to one man’s ambition can thrive. Kuria insists that Mt Kenya needs open political competition, not forced conformity.

    Moses Kuria Calls for Unity While Slamming Gachagua’s Allies

    While Kuria’s attacks on Gachagua were fiery, he also used a Sunday event in Meru to issue a broader warning to the region’s leadership. Without naming names, he condemned those who, in his view, are pushing ethnic loyalty over national unity.

    His criticism is seen as directed at Gachagua and his allies, who have been accused of turning Mt Kenya into a tribal voting bloc.

    Kuria also took a swipe at Kiharu MP Ndindi Nyoro for questioning how the government is handling social security funds. He said it was immoral for leaders within government to publicly undermine its financial agenda.

    According to him, Nyoro’s remarks were irresponsible and harmful to public trust in President William Ruto’s administration.

    Kuria made it clear that while internal debate is healthy, leaders must be cautious not to feed public anxiety for political gain.

    He urged Mt. Kenya leaders to focus on development and unity, not personal ambition or populist rhetoric.

     

  • Gachagua Calls For Boycott of Mt Kenya Musicians Who Visited Kindiki’s Home, Demands Apology Calling Them ‘Traitors’

    Gachagua Calls For Boycott of Mt Kenya Musicians Who Visited Kindiki’s Home, Demands Apology Calling Them ‘Traitors’

    Former Deputy President threatens economic sabotage against artists who met with current DP at Karen residence

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has launched a scathing attack on Mount Kenya musicians who recently visited Deputy President Kithure Kindiki at his Karen residence, branding them “traitors” and demanding they apologize to Kenyans or face a comprehensive boycott.

    Speaking during a church service at AIPCA Kihoya in Kangema Constituency, Murang’a County on Sunday, May 25, 2025, Gachagua escalated his rhetoric against the artists, threatening to organize economic sabotage that would effectively end their careers.

    “We are very sad that some of our artistes have become traitors for the community. They were invited at Karen by Mr Moneybags and told to come and lie to you that SHA (Social Health Authority) is working,” Gachagua declared to the congregation.

    The former Deputy President claimed he had consulted with community elders before making his public pronouncement, adding weight to his ultimatum.

    “I sat down with elders and they told me to announce that the artistes should apologise,” he stated.

    Gachagua outlined a multi-pronged approach to pressuring the musicians, targeting their income streams and public platforms:

    “If they do not apologise, we should stop listening to their music. They should also not be invited to the entertainment joints where they go. If club owners call such a person, customers should shift to another place. Also, unfollow them on social media,” he instructed his supporters.

    The threat extends beyond individual consumer choices to organized economic warfare against entertainment venues that would host the artists.

    This represents an unprecedented escalation in Kenya’s political discourse, where a former high-ranking official is openly calling for coordinated economic sabotage.

    Gachagua’s anger stems from what he perceives as the musicians’ willingness to endorse government policies during their meeting with Kindiki.

    He accused them of being instructed to “tell us that roads are being built and education is running smoothly” in exchange for financial incentives.

    The former Deputy President also made serious allegations against Kindiki personally, claiming his “hands were filled with blood” due to his role as Interior Cabinet Secretary during the 2024 Gen Z protests, when several demonstrators were killed by police.

    The Karen meeting

    The controversial meeting took place at Kindiki’s Karen residence, where the Deputy President hosted various musicians and producers primarily from the Mount Kenya region.

    According to official reports, the discussion focused on the economic potential of the creative sector, supportive policies, and intellectual property rights protection.

    Among the notable attendees were popular musicians Samuel Muchoki Ndirangu (Samidoh), Ben Githae, Karangu Muraya, Jose Gatutura, DJ Fatxo, and Ngaruiya Junior. Several MPs from the region also attended, pledging legislative support for the creative economy.

    Backlash

    Samidoh and DP Kindiki during the meeting with Mt Kenya musicians.
    Samidoh and DP Kindiki during the meeting with Mt Kenya musicians.

    The political fallout has been swift and brutal for the musicians involved. Social media platforms erupted with criticism from fans who accused the artists of “selling out” and abandoning their supporters for political gain.

    Samidoh, one of Kenya’s most popular Mugithi artists, issued an emotional public apology acknowledging the depth of anger directed at him.

    “I am asking for your forgiveness,” he posted on social media.

    “I have seen your anger over my visit to Karen. I’ve received thousands of messages, most of them filled with insults and hate, and it has left me deeply hurt.”

    The artist revealed the personal toll of the controversy, “I am truly struggling, and this situation has pushed me towards depression.”

    He explained that he believed the meeting was meant to promote Mount Kenya musicians rather than serve as a political endorsement.

    Jose Gatutura also defended his attendance, emphasizing his role as an entertainer who serves fans across political divides.

    “I have fans from both sides, and I’m supposed to entertain all without being choosy,” he wrote, clarifying that artists depend on gigs to make a living and that the meeting focused on government support for the music industry.

    Unprecedented political weaponization

    Gachagua’s call for boycotts represents a concerning development in Kenya’s political landscape, where entertainment and arts are being weaponized for political purposes.

    The threat to organize consumer boycotts and pressure entertainment venues creates a dangerous precedent that could stifle artistic freedom and economic opportunities for creatives.

    The controversy highlights the delicate position of artists in Kenya’s polarized political environment, where any engagement with political figures can be interpreted as endorsement and lead to severe backlash from opposing camps.

    As this story continues to develop, it remains to be seen whether the musicians will issue the apologies Gachagua demands or whether they will resist what many view as political intimidation of the creative community.

    The outcome could have lasting implications for the relationship between politics and entertainment in Kenya.

  • New Bill To Allow Govt To See All Websites You’ve Visited

    New Bill To Allow Govt To See All Websites You’ve Visited

    Controversial legislation would require internet providers to track and report all user activity to government authorities

    A new bill making its way through Parliament could give the Kenyan government unprecedented access to citizens’ internet browsing history, sparking concerns about digital privacy and surveillance overreach.

    The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Bill 2025, introduced by Aldai MP Marianne Jebet Kitany, would require all Internet Service Providers to assign unique tracking numbers to customers and submit detailed annual reports of their online activities to the Communications Authority of Kenya.

    Government Database of Internet Activity

    Under the proposed legislation, ISPs would be mandated to monitor and record which websites their customers visit, creating what critics describe as a comprehensive government database of Kenyans’ digital lives.

    The bill specifically requires service providers to “monitor customer usage” and “convert customer usage into readable details.”

    The tracking system would assign each internet user a unique identification number, similar to a utility meter, allowing authorities to link browsing history directly to individual citizens.

    This data would then be compiled annually and handed over to government regulators.

    “This creates an unprecedented level of digital surveillance,” said a digital rights advocate who requested anonymity.

    “The government would essentially have a record of every website visited by every Kenyan with internet access.”

    Expert Warns of Hidden Surveillance Architecture

    Aldai MP Marianne Jebet Kitany is the sponsor of The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Bill 2025.
    Aldai MP Marianne Jebet Kitany is the sponsor of The Kenya Information and Communications (Amendment) Bill 2025.

    Dr. Sarah Mwangi, a cybersecurity expert and digital rights researcher at the University of Nairobi, warns that the bill’s true implications extend far beyond simple internet billing, as the government claims.

    “The requirement for unique meter numbers for every internet user isn’t about billing—it’s about creating a tracking infrastructure,” Dr. Mwangi explained.

    “When you combine individual identification with the mandate to ‘convert internet usage into readable details,’ you’re looking at comprehensive digital surveillance.”

    She raises critical concerns about the bill’s scope: “What does ‘readable details’ actually mean? Does this include which websites you visit, your private messages, your voice calls? The language is deliberately vague, which is deeply troubling from a privacy perspective.”

    Dr. Mwangi particularly warns about the potential for future abuse: “Once you build this kind of digital tracking architecture, it becomes very easy to expand it. We could be looking at the foundation for a social credit system where citizens are scored and potentially punished based on their online behavior.”

    Threat to Journalism and Civil Society

    The cybersecurity expert highlights specific risks for vulnerable groups: “Journalists, activists, and whistleblowers rely on digital anonymity to operate safely. This bill could effectively end anonymous online participation in Kenya, creating a chilling effect on free speech and investigative reporting.”

    She points to concerning questions about data sharing: “The bill doesn’t clearly specify whether this internet usage data will be shared with national security agencies. If it is, we’re talking about mass surveillance of the entire population, not targeted security measures.”

    Social Media Identity Verification Required

    The bill also targets social media platforms, requiring companies like Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram to verify users’ ages through national identification documents.

    While presented as a child protection measure, critics argue this would eliminate anonymous online participation and make it easier for authorities to identify social media users.

    Major international platforms would need to implement new verification systems specifically for Kenyan users, raising questions about compliance and enforcement across global technology companies.

    Constitutional Concerns Raised

    Legal experts are questioning whether the proposed surveillance measures violate constitutional protections for privacy and freedom of expression.

    Kenya’s 2010 Constitution guarantees citizens’ right to privacy, including freedom from unreasonable searches of their property and possessions.

    “There are serious constitutional issues with requiring blanket surveillance of all internet users,” explained a constitutional lawyer familiar with the bill.

    “Such broad monitoring powers would typically require judicial oversight and specific justification.”

    The legislation comes amid growing concerns about digital freedom in Kenya. Freedom House’s 2024 report documented increasing online censorship, including 64 content removal requests submitted to Google by Kenyan authorities in 2023.

    Control Over Digital Infrastructure

    Dr. Mwangi raises additional concerns about infrastructure control: “A key question is who will control this metering infrastructure—the government or private telecoms? If it’s state-controlled, the government essentially controls what citizens can see, say, and stream online.”

    She warns about the lack of safeguards against political targeting: “What protections exist against profiling, targeting, or discrimination? What happens when political opponents can be tracked and potentially harassed based on their internet behavior? These are fundamental questions the bill doesn’t address.”

    Technical and Economic Implications

    Internet service providers would face significant new compliance costs under the proposed system. Companies would need to invest in tracking infrastructure, data storage systems, and reporting mechanisms to meet the government’s requirements.

    These costs could potentially be passed on to consumers through higher internet prices, potentially limiting digital access for lower-income Kenyans.

    Technology experts also question the technical feasibility of comprehensive internet monitoring, particularly with the increasing use of encrypted connections and virtual private networks that can mask user activity.

    If passed, Kenya’s legislation could influence similar efforts across East Africa, where governments are grappling with balancing security concerns against digital rights.

    The bill represents one of the region’s most comprehensive attempts at internet surveillance legislation.

    Other countries have implemented various forms of online monitoring, but few have required such extensive tracking of individual browsing habits by private internet companies.

    The bill will undergo committee review and public participation processes before potential passage. Digital rights organizations are preparing submissions opposing the surveillance provisions, while government supporters argue the measures are necessary for national security and child protection.

    Citizens concerned about the legislation can participate in public hearings and submit comments through official parliamentary channels during the review process.

    The outcome will significantly impact how Kenyans access and use the internet, potentially affecting everything from e-commerce to social media participation and online journalism in the country.

    Dr. Mwangi concludes: “Citizens need to pay close attention to this bill. It may be presented as simple internet metering, but the surveillance architecture it creates could fundamentally change the relationship between Kenyans and their government in the digital space.”​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • LSK Rejects Crucial Finance Bill 2025 Clause Allowing KRA To Access Kenyans’ Bank Accounts

    LSK Rejects Crucial Finance Bill 2025 Clause Allowing KRA To Access Kenyans’ Bank Accounts

    Legal and audit professionals unite against controversial tax authority powers

    The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) has joined forces with major audit firms to strongly oppose contentious provisions in the Finance Bill 2025 that would grant the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) unprecedented access to taxpayers’ personal financial information and trade secrets.

    The legal body, alongside KPMG East Africa, Ernst & Young, and CDH Law Firm, has raised serious concerns about clauses that they argue fundamentally undermine individual privacy rights and due process protections for Kenyan taxpayers.

    At the heart of the controversy is a provision that would allow KRA automatic access to taxpayers’ confidential financial data and trade secrets, even while tax appeals are still pending in court.

    This represents a significant departure from current practice, where such access typically requires judicial oversight or completion of legal proceedings.

    The LSK and audit firms argue that this clause violates fundamental principles of due process, as it would allow the tax authority to access sensitive information before taxpayers have exhausted their legal remedies through the appeals process.

    “This move undermines due process and taxpayers’ rights to fair adjudication,” the legal professionals stated in their submissions to the National Assembly Finance Committee.

    Spousal Liability Clause

    Another provision drawing unanimous rejection seeks to make spouses of tax defaulters personally liable for outstanding tax debts.

    The LSK has described this proposal as fundamentally unfair, emphasizing that individual financial responsibility should not extend to family members who were not party to the original tax obligations.

    “Someone seeking credit facilitation and defaults is a personal venture,” the LSK emphasized, warning that holding spouses accountable for another person’s tax obligations could have serious social implications and disrupt family structures.

    The proposed Finance Bill also includes Clause 50b, which would extend the timeline for processing tax overpayment claims from the current 90 days to 120 days for initial claims, and from 120 days to 180 days for reviews.

    Critics warn that these extended timelines could severely impact taxpayers’ cash flow and potentially destabilize the broader economy by delaying refunds that businesses and individuals rely on for operational expenses.

    Legal professionals have also challenged provisions that would allow the KRA Commissioner to issue agency notices during ongoing appeals.

    This power, they argue, would effectively erode taxpayers’ protections and disrupt established legal processes designed to ensure fair treatment.

    The ability to issue such notices while appeals are active could pressure taxpayers to settle disputes prematurely rather than pursue their legal rights through the courts.

    Housing Incentive Removal

    Beyond privacy and liability issues, the LSK has opposed the proposed removal of a 15 percent income tax rebate for companies constructing at least 100 residential units annually.

    This incentive, introduced in 2017 to encourage affordable housing development, has been credited with attracting significant investment to the sector.

    The legal society warns that removing this rebate could discourage both local and foreign investors, potentially slowing growth in Kenya’s housing sector at a time when affordable housing remains a national priority.

    National Assembly Finance Committee Chairman Kuria Kimani has acknowledged the concerns raised by the legal and audit professionals, stating that “We will consider your views as stated.” However, the committee has not indicated whether it will modify or remove the controversial clauses.

    The controversy comes as Kenya faces significant challenges in tax collection, with uncollected taxes ballooning to Sh2.3 trillion as the KRA continues to struggle with compliance and collection efficiency.

    The authority recently concluded an amnesty programme that waived Sh158 billion in penalties for 2.9 million taxpayers.

    Public hearings on the Finance Bill 2025 are ongoing, running alongside discussions on the Virtual Assets Providers Bill 2025, which addresses tax regulations for cryptocurrencies.

    If passed in its current form, the Finance Bill 2025 would represent a significant shift in the balance of power between taxpayers and the revenue authority.

    The provisions would grant KRA immediate access to personal financial data during appeals, create potential liability for spouses of tax defaulters, xtend refund processing times by 30-60 days, allow tax enforcement actions during pending appeals and remove housing development incentives.

    The united opposition from Kenya’s legal and audit community signals the gravity of concerns about these provisions and their potential impact on taxpayer rights and economic stability.

    As public hearings continue, the Finance Committee faces mounting pressure to reconsider these controversial clauses or risk implementing legislation that legal experts warn could undermine fundamental protections for Kenyan taxpayers.

    The outcome of these deliberations will likely set important precedents for the relationship between citizens and tax authorities in Kenya, with implications extending far beyond the immediate fiscal year.

  • Defunding Education? Ruto Scraps Uhuru’s Sh5B Exam Waiver

    Defunding Education? Ruto Scraps Uhuru’s Sh5B Exam Waiver

    Government shifts to targeted subsidy model as parents face return of examination fees after decade-long waiver

    In a dramatic policy reversal that threatens to burden millions of Kenyan families, President William Ruto’s administration has announced plans to scrap the universal examination fee waiver introduced by former President Uhuru Kenyatta in 2015, forcing parents to once again pay for their children’s national examinations starting next year.

    Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi revealed the controversial decision in a recent interview, signaling the end of a decade-long policy that has enabled all learners in both public and private schools to sit national examinations without cost.

    The move affects the Kenya Primary School Education Assessment (KPSEA), Kenya Junior School Education Assessment (KJSEA), and Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education (KCSE) examinations.

    The new policy mirrors the government’s contentious higher education funding model introduced in 2023, shifting from universal coverage to a targeted subsidy approach that will only benefit students deemed “needy” through an undisclosed means-testing mechanism.

    “The Ministry of Education must come up with criteria of identifying those who can pay examination fees,” Mbadi explained, defending the policy with pointed rhetoric.

    “If your child is learning in a private school where you pay Sh300,000 per term or Sh1 million in a year, honestly, can’t you pay Sh5,000 examination fees for that child? Why should you force taxpayers, some of whom can barely make a living, to pay examination fees for your child?”

    The Treasury CS justified the decision as necessary for “fiscal responsibility and fairness” in government spending, though he provided no details on how student neediness would be determined or what safeguards would prevent eligible students from being excluded.

    When President Kenyatta introduced the waiver in 2015 for public school students and extended it to private schools in 2017, the government allocated Sh4 billion annually to cover examination costs.

    This figure has since grown to Sh5 billion over the past two years as student enrollment surged under the 100 percent transition policy.

    The waiver eliminated fees that previously cost families Sh800 for primary school examinations and up to Sh2,700 plus Sh400 per subject for secondary school tests. Its removal represents a significant financial burden for families already struggling with Kenya’s rising cost of living.

    Examining the numbers

    The policy’s success in increasing access is undeniable. Kenya National Examinations Council (KNEC) CEO Dr. David Njeng’ere highlighted how candidature has “significantly increased over the 10 years the waiver has been in use.” By 2026, the Ministry of Education projects over three million learners will sit for national examinations across all levels.

    However, this growth has strained KNEC’s resources. The council has struggled to pay contracted examination officials due to what Njeng’ere describes as inadequate funding, with the organization receiving lump-sum grants regardless of candidate numbers rather than per-capita allocations.

    “We never had problems prior to 2015 when candidates used to pay individually. We’re four months to the exams and we still don’t have money,” Njeng’ere stated, revealing the financial pressures behind the policy shift.

    Concerns mount

    National Parents Association chairperson Silas Obuhatsa warned of potentially devastating consequences, drawing parallels to the troubled higher education funding model currently facing legal challenges.

    “This policy shift could become a major problem for parents. Some may be forced to withdraw their children from school, which could result in increased dropout rates, especially among vulnerable learners,” Obuhatsa cautioned.

    He emphasized the complexity of means-testing, noting that even private school students may be on scholarships or sponsorships, making accurate need assessment challenging.

    “How will the government, particularly at the basic education level, accurately determine who can and cannot afford to pay exam fees?” he questioned.

    The proposed examination fee model closely resembles the controversial university funding system that replaced blanket government support with a four-tier classification system ranking students as vulnerable, extremely needy, needy, or less needy.

    That model has faced implementation challenges, legal disputes, and criticism for leaving thousands of students to fund their education independently.

    The higher education funding model’s troubled rollout serves as a cautionary tale for the examination fee changes, suggesting potential administrative difficulties and access barriers for eligible students.

    The policy reversal comes amid President William Ruto’s broader economic reforms aimed at reducing government expenditure and targeting subsidies more precisely.

    However, critics argue that removing universal access to examinations—a cornerstone of educational equity—undermines the administration’s commitment to inclusive education.

    The timing is particularly sensitive given Kenya’s economic challenges and the government’s emphasis on human capital development as a driver of economic growth.

    Education stakeholders worry that reintroducing financial barriers at the examination level could reverse gains in enrollment and transition rates achieved over the past decade.

    Implementation timeline

    While Mbadi assured that funding exists for this year’s examinations and that “parents should not panic,” the uncertainty has already created anxiety among stakeholders.

    The policy is set to take effect next year, giving the Ministry of Education limited time to develop and test the means-testing criteria.

    The lack of public participation in the decision-making process has drawn criticism, with parents’ representatives calling for meaningful consultation before implementation.

    This echoes broader concerns about the government’s approach to education policy reforms without adequate stakeholder engagement.

    As Kenya prepares for this significant policy shift, several critical questions remain unanswered: How will need be accurately assessed? What appeals process will exist for disputed classifications? How will the government prevent eligible students from falling through administrative cracks?

    The success or failure of this policy change will likely influence broader debates about the role of government in ensuring educational access and equity in Kenya.

    With over three million students expected to take national examinations in 2026, the stakes for getting implementation right could not be higher.

    For now, parents, students, and education stakeholders anxiously await details on how this fundamental shift in examination funding will unfold, hoping that the government’s promise of targeted support will not inadvertently create new barriers to educational achievement for Kenya’s young people.

  • Mudavadi on Why Kenya Remained ‘Silent’ in Tanzanian Detention Row

    Mudavadi on Why Kenya Remained ‘Silent’ in Tanzanian Detention Row

    Kenya’s Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has defended the government’s measured response to the detention of activist Boniface Mwangi in Tanzania, explaining why Nairobi chose cooperation over confrontation despite public outcry.

    In a statement released Friday, Mudavadi addressed mounting criticism over Kenya’s seemingly muted reaction to Mwangi’s detention by Tanzanian authorities, which had sparked widespread online outrage and calls for diplomatic intervention.

    Mudavadi revealed that Kenya’s cautious approach was driven by significant economic considerations, with Tanzania serving as a crucial trading partner and host to approximately 250,000 Kenyan citizens.

    “Tanzania ranks sixth among Kenya’s export destinations, accounting for 23 percent of our exports to the East African Community market,” Mudavadi explained, citing 2025 Economic Survey data.

    The country also stands as Kenya’s ninth-largest source of imports and second-largest trading partner in Africa after South Africa.

    The manufacturing sector, which employed 369,200 Kenyans in 2024, heavily depends on regional exports, with Uganda taking the lead at 43 percent of EAC market exports.

    Defending the government’s diplomatic strategy, Mudavadi emphasized that Kenya and Tanzania share “long-standing diplomatic ties, including non-interference in each other’s internal affairs.”

    “The path to resolution lay not in confrontation, but cooperation,” he stated.

    “Our engagement with Tanzania was guided by mutual respect, discretion and the shared understanding that there is a deep bond between our peoples.”

    The Prime Cabinet Secretary argued that while online activism can raise awareness, “it cannot replace the structured dialogue that preserves our bilateral ties and respect for each other’s sovereignty.”

    Balancing individual rights and national interests

    Addressing criticism that the government had abandoned Mwangi, Mudavadi acknowledged Kenyans’ constitutional rights while urging restraint in their exercise.

    “Our constitution guarantees the rights of the individual, but those rights must not overshadow the interests of the millions of other citizens,” he said, emphasizing the government’s obligation to protect the livelihoods of Kenyans working in neighboring countries.

    Mudavadi confirmed that the matter involving Mwangi had been “resolved amicably” through established diplomatic channels, though he provided no details about the resolution process.

    The statement underscored Kenya’s dependence on regional relationships for economic prosperity, with Mudavadi warning against isolation.

    “No nation prospers in isolation. Kenya’s development is anchored in strong economic ties and strategic partnerships with our neighbours,” he said, referencing the recently published 2025 Economic Survey.

    The diplomatic incident highlights the delicate balance Kenya must maintain between protecting its citizens’ rights abroad and preserving crucial economic relationships that underpin domestic employment and trade.

    Mudavadi urged Kenyans to “see the bigger picture” and recognize that the country’s “prosperity, peace and future depend on our ability to build bridges and nurture them in the national interest.”

    The statement comes as Kenya continues to navigate complex regional dynamics while managing domestic expectations for more assertive diplomatic positions on human rights issues.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Celebrations in President Ruto’s Circle as Gen Z Diverts Online Campaigns to President Suluhu’s Doorstep

    Celebrations in President Ruto’s Circle as Gen Z Diverts Online Campaigns to President Suluhu’s Doorstep

    By Claude Masika

    There are celebrations and relief in State House after Gen Z activists decided to redirect their online opposition from President William Ruto’s government to focus on Tanzania’s President Samia Suluhu.

    According to sources within the Office of the President, the shift in attacks toward President Samia Suluhu will help President Ruto advance his agenda, including developing new strategies for winning the next election and achieving parts of his manifesto before his term ends.

    “Gen Z activists from Kenya have been a significant challenge for the President. Their diverted attention to President Samia Suluhu is a major relief for President William Ruto,” said a source close to the administration.

    This development follows President Suluhu’s government forcefully deporting veteran Kenyan advocate Martha Karua and other activists, preventing them from attending opposition leader Tundu Lissu’s treason trial.

    Martha Karua has written to the African Union protesting President Suluhu’s decision, while activist Boniface Mwangi continues to receive medical treatment at a Kenyan hospital.

    In response, Gen Z activists have declared a ceasefire with President William Ruto’s administration to address what they describe as a serious dictatorial regime in Tanzania. TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), and Facebook are now filled with anti-President Samia Suluhu posts and commentary.

    One notable TikTok post featured a wrestling match between President Samia Suluhu and Martha Karua, with Karua winning decisively.

    President William Ruto has remained silent on the online campaign as he focuses on other national issues that will not place him at the center of controversy.

    “We are now focusing on Tanzania. We just realized that this country is in danger following the death of John Pombe Magufuli,” said a Kenyan youth activist.

    President Suluhu has defended her actions, stating that the Kenyan activists intended to disrupt peace in Tanzania and had malicious intentions.

    In related news, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa encountered an unexpected situation during his visit to the United States, where he found his domestic political rival featured on American television networks after President Trump reportedly ordered his IT team to broadcast clips of the rival discussing alleged violence against white farmers.

  • Kindiki Millions Fuel Mt Kenya Vote Hunt as Projects Stall Across Kenya

    Kindiki Millions Fuel Mt Kenya Vote Hunt as Projects Stall Across Kenya

    Deputy President Kithure Kindiki has turned his back on development and instead opened the floodgates of cash to woo the vote-rich Mount Kenya region.

    In less than two months, Kindiki has splashed over Sh100 million in public donations across churches, boda boda groups, and women’s saccos, all in the name of economic empowerment.

    But Kenyans are not buying it. As prices rise and public services stall, the DP’s flashy “empowerment” tour draws outrage.

    With 2027 on the horizon, Kindiki is desperately muscling into a political zone once dominated by impeached former DP Rigathi Gachagua — and taxpayers are footing the bill.

    Kithure Kindiki’s actions betray a cynical view of Kenyan voters — one that assumes they can be swayed by handouts rather than real progress. But the tide is shifting. Citizens are demanding more than empty speeches and envelopes full of cash. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Kindiki Millions Raise Eyebrows as Development Projects Languish

    For a country where millions struggle to put food on the table, Deputy President Kithure Kindiki’s recent spending spree reads like a cruel joke. The Nation has reported that Kindiki has presided over fundraisers totaling more than Sh100 million in just two months, mostly focused on the Mount Kenya region. This is not empowerment — it’s electioneering in disguise.

    The DP’s stops have included Naivasha, Kiambu Town, Lari, Gatundu North, Limuru, Kirinyaga Central, Mwea, Kipipiri, Ol Kalou, Imenti, Kigumo, and South Mugirango. At each location, Kindiki has generously dished out cash to local groups — all under the so-called “economic empowerment programmes.”

    But what’s missing from these flashy roadshows is any sign of meaningful, long-term development. There are no water projects. No schools. No new healthcare centers. Just millions of shillings changing hands — and more questions than answers about where the money is coming from.

    It gets worse. Kindiki is often flanked by Principal Secretaries, who also make their own hefty donations. Meanwhile, Cabinet-level development efforts stall, and Kenyans continue to suffer from joblessness, high taxes, and runaway inflation. What message does it send when leaders donate tens of millions but fail to build basic infrastructure?

    Political Games Take Priority Over Real Needs

    This sudden generosity isn’t about helping the people. It’s a clear political tactic aimed at undermining Rigathi Gachagua’s grip on the Mount Kenya bloc. After his impeachment, Gachagua began regrouping to reassert his influence and use the region as political leverage in the 2027 election cycle.

    Kindiki knows this, and he’s moving quickly — not with policy or vision, but with cold, hard cash.

    This political muscle-flexing is setting a dangerous precedent. If leaders can effectively buy loyalty through staged Harambees, then Kenya’s democracy is no longer about vision or performance — it’s about who has the deepest pockets.

    It’s worth asking: Where is the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC)? Why are state officials freely throwing millions around without scrutiny? When citizens are tightening belts and the country is reeling from a ballooning public debt, this kind of reckless generosity is insulting — and likely unlawful.

    Kenyans Deserve Better Than Kindiki’s Vote-Buying Tactics

    The use of public office to push political ambition is not new. But Kindiki’s approach takes it to dangerous new heights. It shifts attention away from governance and channels it into a personality cult — one powered by money, not merit.

    While the DP goes on a donation spree, farmers in Meru and Nyandarua wait for subsidized fertilizer. Schoolchildren in rural areas walk for miles because the government hasn’t prioritized school buses or classrooms. Clinics in Kipipiri remain understaffed and ill-equipped.

    Yet millions flow freely into briefcases and brown envelopes at church gatherings and market meetings.

    This is not leadership. It’s a diversion. And it’s turning public service into a stage for political theater.

    Kenyans are watching. And they are angry. They see the hypocrisy: a government that pleads austerity on one hand, then bankrolls lavish weekend roadshows on the other.

    They hear President William Ruto talk about the “Bottom-Up” economy but see his deputy pump millions into short-term photo ops instead of long-term solutions.

  • Gachagua Sets Kasarani Stadium as Venue for DCP Party Official Launch

    Gachagua Sets Kasarani Stadium as Venue for DCP Party Official Launch

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has confirmed Kasarani Stadium Gymnasium as the venue for the official launch of his Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP), scheduled for Tuesday, June 3, 2025.

    The announcement comes through a formal booking letter submitted by the party’s interim Secretary General Hezron Obaga, indicating the event will accommodate approximately 5,000 attendees including party members, supporters, invited guests, and media representatives.

    “We plan to use the facility for speeches, performances, and interactive sessions aimed at unveiling our vision, manifesto, and leadership to the Kenyan public,” the booking correspondence reveals.

    The June launch represents the official debut of Gachagua’s political movement, following what many considered a preliminary unveiling on May 15, 2025, where the former Deputy President revealed the party’s name and interim leadership structure after months of behind-the-scenes preparations.

    During that earlier event, Gachagua announced that the party’s registration documents had been submitted to the Registrar of Political Parties for official ratification. The interim leadership team assembled includes notable political figures from across Kenya’s regions, with former UDA Secretary General Cleophas Malala taking the deputy party leader position.

    The leadership roster spans multiple counties, featuring former Cabinet Secretary Mithika Linturi as National Organising Secretary, former Laikipia Woman Representative Catherine Waruguru as National Women Leader, and David Mingati from Kajiado as National Chairperson.

    Key appointments across the party structure include representatives from Kiambu, Kisumu, Kisii, Narok, Machakos, Embu, Migori, Uasin Gishu, and other counties, reflecting Gachagua’s strategy to build a nationally representative political organization.

    The Kasarani venue choice signals the party’s ambition to make a significant statement in Kenya’s political landscape, with the gymnasium’s capacity aligning with DCP’s expectations for substantial public interest in their formal political debut.

    The June 3 launch will serve as the platform for presenting the party’s comprehensive manifesto and policy positions to the Kenyan electorate, marking Gachagua’s transition from his previous role in government to opposition politics.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Ruto-Linked Amaco Wins Billions in Matatu Insurance Cover, Cutting SK Macharia’s Dominance

    Ruto-Linked Amaco Wins Billions in Matatu Insurance Cover, Cutting SK Macharia’s Dominance

    A dramatic shift is reshaping Kenya’s lucrative matatu insurance market, with Africa Merchant Assurance Company (Amaco) – an insurer with ties to President William Ruto’s family – capturing billions of shillings in business at the expense of media mogul SK Macharia’s Directline Assurance.

    Insurance Regulatory Authority data reveals that Amaco has more than doubled its market share in public service vehicle insurance within just one year, jumping from 14.95 percent to 37.51 percent of the Sh5.29 billion matatu insurance market by December 2024.

    This aggressive expansion has come directly at the cost of Directline Assurance, which has seen its long-held dominance erode dramatically.

    The company’s market share plummeted from 61.56 percent to 47.97 percent over the same period – marking the first time Directline has fallen below 50 percent market share since regulators began tracking PSV insurance as a separate category.

    The numbers tell a stark story of market redistribution.

    Amaco gained Sh1.15 billion in PSV premiums, reaching Sh1.98 billion – a staggering 139.7 percent increase.

    Meanwhile, Directline hemorrhaged Sh860 million in business, with its PSV premiums falling 25.4 percent to Sh2.54 billion.

    Political undertones

    The business battle carries significant political undertones, given the historical rivalry between President Ruto and SK Macharia.

    The media mogul consistently backed opposition leader Raila Odinga in successive presidential campaigns, including the 2022 election where Odinga unsuccessfully challenged Ruto for the presidency.

    Amaco’s ownership structure reveals deep connections to the first family.

    Business Registration Services records show President Ruto’s family holds 190,000 shares (15.83 percent) through Yegen Farms Limited, where First Lady Rachel Ruto and daughter Charlene Ruto are listed as shareholders.

    This represents a nearly four-fold increase from their 50,000 shares in July 2022.

    The president’s close associates also maintain significant stakes.

    Charles Tela Alusala, who manages the family’s business affairs, owns 130,000 shares (10.83 percent). Dr. Ruto’s friend Silas Kibet Simwato, who chairs the Digital Health Agency, controls shares worth 23.33 percent through direct ownership and family companies.

    Directline’s troubles

    SK Macharia.
    SK Macharia.

    Industry analysts attribute Directline’s market losses to internal turmoil that reached a crescendo in 2024.

    The company became embroiled in shareholder disputes, with SK Macharia claiming unauthorized alterations to the share registry through forged documents had diluted his ownership stake.

    The conflict escalated when Macharia ran public advertisements declaring all Directline insurance policies “invalid” due to what he termed “illegal” shareholding changes.

    This unprecedented move rattled policyholders and drew regulatory intervention, with the Insurance Regulatory Authority successfully obtaining court orders to stop the campaign.

    The dispute intensified when Macharia withdrew Sh400 million from the company amid the boardroom battles, prompting regulatory action in October 2024 seeking reversal of the withdrawal.

    Amaco may have also benefited from the collapse of Invesco Assurance, another PSV insurer that entered statutory management in 2024 after defaulting on claims payments. Invesco previously held 8.15 percent of the PSV market, worth Sh138.5 million in premiums.

    The two dominant players now control 85.5 percent of Kenya’s PSV insurance market, with smaller competitors including First Assurance (9.45 percent), GA Insurance (2.62 percent), and others sharing the remainder.

    Beyond PSV insurance, Amaco has expanded aggressively across motor insurance segments. Its commercial vehicle premiums (excluding PSVs) jumped 2.7 times to Sh657.4 million, while private motor cover premiums rose 29 percent to Sh515.4 million.

    The transformation of this critical insurance sector reflects broader shifts in Kenya’s business landscape, where political connections increasingly influence market dynamics in strategic industries.

    As matatu insurance remains essential for the country’s public transport system, the concentration of market power between these two rivals bears watching for both economic and political implications.

    The battle for matatu insurance supremacy appears far from over, with billions of shillings in annual premiums at stake and the added dimension of Kenya’s complex political rivalries driving the competition.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • ‘I Regret Impeaching Gachagua,’ Gloria Orwoba Says‬

    ‘I Regret Impeaching Gachagua,’ Gloria Orwoba Says‬

    Former UDA legislator admits she misinterpreted “Usiguze Mlima” movement, acknowledges ex-DP has become unifying figure

    Nominated Senator Gloria Orwoba has publicly expressed regret over her decision to vote for the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua in October 2024, citing a misinterpretation of the political circumstances that influenced her judgment.

    In an interview on Thursday, Orwoba revealed that her support for Gachagua’s removal was primarily driven by her misunderstanding of the “Usiguze Murima” slogan, which she now admits to having interpreted incorrectly.

    “The only thing that could be substantiated was that Rigathi Gachagua had a movement coming from his community that was misinterpreted by Kenyans, and the Usiguze Mlima movement – I was one of the people who misinterpreted it,” Orwoba acknowledged.

    The senator explained that during the impeachment proceedings, she had questioned the motion’s sponsors for failing to adequately substantiate the eleven charges leveled against Gachagua.

    Of all the accusations, she said only one appeared to have merit – the perception that Gachagua was promoting divisive tribal politics through his community-based movement.

    “When I was impeaching, I was one of the guys saying you bring 11 counts, yet you can’t substantiate any of it, even 9. It is in my speech during the impeachment,” Orwoba stated, defending her initial scrutiny of the charges.

    However, she admitted that the fear and divisiveness she perceived in Gachagua’s movement at the time led her to view him as a tribal leader, ultimately pushing her to support his removal based on that single count.

    Orwoba’s regret stems from what she now sees as Gachagua’s transformation into a unifying political figure. She praised the former Deputy President’s evolution, noting that despite initial perceptions of divisive politics, he has emerged as someone who brings Kenyans together.

    “The same Rigathi Gachagua, despite starting off at a point of what was perceived as divisive politics, has actually become the person who has united Kenyans,” she observed.

    When pressed about potential future political collaboration with Gachagua, Orwoba remained non-committal, stating only that she would align herself with movements that prioritize Kenyan interests and women’s rights.

    Orwoba’s admission comes just days after her expulsion from the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) on May 19, 2025.

    The party’s disciplinary committee, with approval from the National Executive Committee, removed her over allegations of disloyalty and violations of the party’s code of conduct.

    Her troubles with UDA stemmed primarily from her association with former Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i, who is positioning himself for the 2027 presidential race as an opposition figure.

    The party cited her presence at Matiang’i’s airport reception and homecoming events, as well as her criticism of President William Ruto’s labor mobility program, as evidence of her disloyalty.

    The senator’s change of heart regarding Gachagua’s impeachment adds another layer to Kenya’s evolving political landscape, particularly as various leaders reassess their positions ahead of the 2027 elections.

  • OPINION: Why Raila’s 2027 Presidential Bid Is Both Inevitable and Strategic

    OPINION: Why Raila’s 2027 Presidential Bid Is Both Inevitable and Strategic

    The unfinished legacy

    The recent revelation that Raila Odinga intends to contest the presidency once more in 2027 may surprise some, but to seasoned observers of Kenya’s political landscape, it represents the logical culmination of a decades-long pursuit of power.

    After five unsuccessful attempts at the presidency, one might reasonably expect Raila to gracefully exit the stage.

    However, this misunderstands both the man and the moment.

    For Raila, the presidency has never been merely an ambition but a mission—the final chapter of a political narrative that began with his father, Jaramogi Oginga Odinga.

    This quest transcends personal aspiration; it represents the fulfillment of a historical trajectory that has shaped Kenya’s opposition politics for generations.

    Like the marathon runner who stumbles repeatedly yet rises for one final sprint, Raila appears determined to complete what he started, viewing 2027 as potentially his last opportunity to transform his reformist vision into governing reality.

    ODM’s existential dilemma

    The Orange Democratic Movement faces an existential crisis that only Raila’s candidacy can temporarily resolve. Just the way Cotu cannot survive without its secretary general Francis Atwoli, the same is with ODM without Raila.

    The party has failed to nurture a successor with comparable national appeal or cross-regional support. Figures like Hassan Joho, Wycliffe Oparanya, and John Mbadi, while regionally influential, lack Raila’s historical gravitas and nationwide recognition.

    Raila’s candidacy thus becomes a lifeline for a party struggling with succession planning.

    Should he retire without a clear heir, ODM risks fragmentation along regional lines, with various lieutenants carving out personal fiefdoms rather than maintaining a cohesive national opposition movement.

    By running again, Raila buys time for this transition while preserving party unity in the immediate term.

    The Ruto-Raila paradox

    Perhaps the most fascinating dimension of Raila’s 2027 bid is the evolving relationship with President William Ruto.

    Their détente, formalized through a memorandum of understanding between ODM and UDA, creates a political paradox that is ostensible opponents who have developed a symbiotic relationship.

    For Ruto, Raila’s candidacy serves several purposes. It potentially divides opposition votes, particularly if Kalonzo Musyoka runs independently.

    Additionally, it provides Ruto with a known quantity as his principal challenger—someone with whom he has established working parameters and mutual understanding.

    Most importantly, should no candidate secure an outright majority, Raila becomes a potential coalition partner in a power-sharing arrangement that could preserve Ruto’s presidency.

    For Raila, meanwhile, running offers leverage regardless of outcome.

    Victory would obviously crown his career with the presidency he has long sought. But even in defeat, his substantial vote share would guarantee him a seat at the table in post-election negotiations.

    This explains the curious dynamic whereby Raila can simultaneously position himself as an opposition figure while maintaining cooperative relations with the administration.

    Kingmaker or King?

    ODM leader Raila Odinga.
    ODM leader Raila Odinga.

    This leads to the central question about Raila’s intentions: Is he genuinely running to win, or positioning himself as the ultimate kingmaker in Kenyan politics?

    The evidence suggests both motives are at play. Raila undoubtedly retains presidential ambitions, but he is pragmatic enough to recognize the value of alternative outcomes.

    By maintaining a significant political base, he ensures that even in defeat, he remains indispensable to Kenya’s governance calculations.

    This dual strategy explains ODM’s current positioning: maintaining enough critical distance from the Ruto administration to preserve opposition credentials, while cooperating sufficiently to demonstrate governance capability.

    It’s a high-wire act that only a political veteran of Raila’s caliber could attempt.

    The economic backdrop

    Raila’s calculation likely factors in Kenya’s challenging economic climate. With the cost of living continuing to rise and public frustration mounting over unfulfilled economic promises, the 2027 election will inevitably become a referendum on Ruto’s first-term performance.

    However, Raila faces the delicate task of critiquing an administration with which he has increasingly aligned.

    His involvement in government affairs, particularly following the MOU between ODM and UDA, makes it difficult to entirely distance himself from Ruto’s economic record.

    This explains recent statements by ODM secretary general Edwin Sifuna and Raila’s brother Oburu Odinga, both of whom have begun articulating more critical positions toward the government—laying groundwork for Raila to eventually pivot toward a more oppositional stance.

    The Opposition matrix

    Raila’s entry transforms the opposition landscape, potentially marginalizing Kalonzo Musyoka, who has spent considerable energy positioning himself as the presumptive opposition flagbearer.

    The tension between these two senior opposition figures could prove detrimental to both, splitting the anti-incumbency vote in a manner that historically benefits sitting presidents.

    However, if Raila can consolidate opposition support—perhaps by eventually offering Kalonzo a significant role in his campaign—they could present a formidable challenge to Ruto.

    The additional wild cards of potential candidacies by Fred Matiang’i or even Rigathi Gachagua (should his legal challenges be resolved) further complicate the electoral math.

    The Final stand

    Perhaps most compelling is the personal dimension of Raila’s decision.

    At his age, 2027 truly represents his final viable opportunity to achieve the presidency.

    Having come tantalizingly close in previous contests, particularly in 2007 and 2017, the temptation for one last attempt proves irresistible.

    There’s a certain symmetry to Raila’s persistence—a quality that has defined his political career.

    From detention under the Moi regime to his central role in constitutional reforms, from prime minister to perennial presidential contender, his story has been one of resilience against seemingly insurmountable odds.

    The 2027 bid thus represents not merely a political calculation but the culmination of a lifetime’s struggle.

    Raila Odinga’s decision to contest the 2027 presidency reflects a complex interplay of personal ambition, party preservation, strategic positioning, and historical legacy.

    Far from a quixotic pursuit, it represents a calculated move by one of Kenya’s most astute political operators.

    Whether he ultimately seeks to be king or kingmaker remains to be seen.

    What’s certain is that his entry fundamentally reshapes Kenya’s political landscape, forcing all players—from Ruto to Kalonzo to regional power brokers—to recalibrate their strategies in response.

    As Kenya navigates economic challenges and evolving political alliances, Raila’s final presidential campaign promises to be as consequential as it is captivating—a fitting finale to one of the most remarkable political careers in African history.

  • President Ruto Appoints Former Turkana Assembly Speaker Doye Nakuleu as Senior Political Advisor in His Office

    President Ruto Appoints Former Turkana Assembly Speaker Doye Nakuleu as Senior Political Advisor in His Office

    Former Turkana North MP and EALA representative Christopher Doye Nakuleu has landed the role of Senior Political Advisor to President William Ruto, adding to the growing list of advisers in his government.

    Nakuleu brings decades of political experience to State House, having served as a two-term MP for Turkana North between 2013 and 2022, a member of the East African Legislative Assembly from 2007 to 2012, and as Speaker of the Turkana County Assembly from 2022 until February 2025.

    He resigned from his county position on February 26 following a motion seeking his removal over allegations of gross misconduct, tabled by Kalokol Ward MCA Michael Ebenyo.

    Cabinet Secretary for East African Community Beatrice Askul Moe welcomed the appointment and praised Nakuleu’s qualifications.

    “Congratulations, Christopher Doye Nakuleu, on your appointment as Senior Political Advisor to President William Ruto,” she said on her official X social media platform.

    Christopher Doye Nakuleu
    Christopher Doye Nakuleu

    “Having served as an EALA (East African Legislative Assembly) member, Turkana North MP for two terms and recently as the Speaker of the County Assembly of Turkana, you have accumulated a wealth of valuable experience in the political arena to prepare you well for this role.”

    Nakuleu’s appointment comes as part of a broader expansion of advisory roles within the presidency.

    The team now includes 21 special advisers covering various sectors, among them Makau Mutua (Constitutional Affairs), Moses Kuria (Economic Affairs), David Ndii (Chair of Economic Advisors), Monica Juma (National Security), and Dominic Menjo (Food Security and Animal Production).

    Other advisers include Edward Kisiang’ani, Joseph Boinnet, Jaoko Oburu, Silvester Kasuku, Harriette Chiggai, Abdi Guliye, Nancy Laibuni, Kennedy Ogeto, Augustine Cheruiyot, Henry Kinyua, Joe Ager, Karisa Nzai, Ali Somane, Mohammed Hassan, and Steven Otieno.

    The growing list of presidential advisors has sparked concerns over rising public expenditure, with the cost of maintaining the expanded team reportedly running into over a billion shillings annually.

  • Fight For Control of Sh50B World Bank Cash Stirs Boardroom Wars at ICT Authority

    Fight For Control of Sh50B World Bank Cash Stirs Boardroom Wars at ICT Authority

    A fierce boardroom battle has erupted at the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Authority, with three directors shown the door following their opposition to the renewal of the CEO’s contract, in what insiders claim is a high-stakes struggle for control over a Sh50 billion World Bank project.

    The Kenya Digital Economy Acceleration Project, approved in March 2023 and expected to run until October 2028, has become the focal point of an increasingly bitter dispute between State House officials and ICT Authority board members who claim proper procedures were ignored in extending CEO Stanley Kamanguya’s term.

    “Together with all board directors, we approved renewal of contract for ICT Authority CEO Stanley Kamanguya against the wishes of some power mandates,” said Michael Njogi Wachira, one of the three ousted directors. “CS Kabogo was ahead to append his signature board resolutions for that renewal having satisfied himself that we followed the right process.”

    The controversy intensified last month when ICT Cabinet Secretary William Kabogo ratified the decision to extend Kamanguya’s contract for three more years, despite objections from Felix Koskel, the Head of Public Service and State House Chief of Staff, who reportedly instructed all boards to seek guidance from his office before renewing contracts of CEOs.

    Sources close to the matter allege an orchestrated scheme to remove Kamanguya from office, with claims that “power mandarins are now looking for technicalities to overturn CS’s signature and terminate the renewed contract for CEO.”

    Another source familiar with the proceedings at the March 6 board meeting described how the chairperson “kept insisting that we adjourn,” but was overruled by other board members. When the chairperson realized “it was not going his way, he feigned sickness,” at which point a representative from the State Cooperation’s inspectorate advised the board that they could legally appoint a sessional chairperson who would chair the meeting.

    The three dismissed directors—Annette Mutuku, Alfred Ngeno, and Michael Njogi Wachira—have filed complaints with the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), claiming their removal was punishment for “standing with what was right.” They have also received summons from the EACC as part of the investigation.

    “The fidelity to the rule of law that the board and Waziri Kabogo exercised is on the verge of defilement through arm-twisting of various agencies,” one director stated.

    The Attorney General has issued an advisory declaring the board meeting “improcedural based on one-sided story and without hearing from the rest of the board members,” a determination the sacked directors describe as “suspicious and malicious.”

    The dismissed directors have been replaced by Leah Manyarkiy, Christopher Matsehe Ndaica, and Dominic Salvio Kariuki Wambugu.

    Several government departments stand to benefit from the World Bank-funded project, including the Ministry of ICT and the Digital Economy, Office of the Data Protection Commissioner, Communications Authority of Kenya, Ministry of Public Service, Ministry of Investments, Trade and Industry, the Cabinet Office, Office of the Attorney General, and the Kenya Revenue Authority.

    As the dispute continues to unfold, questions remain about the future management of the Sh50 billion project and whether the procedural concerns raised by both sides will be adequately addressed by investigating authorities.

  • “Assist Us Discipline Them,” Cherargei Says President Suluhu Should Have Prosecuted Kenyan Activists

    “Assist Us Discipline Them,” Cherargei Says President Suluhu Should Have Prosecuted Kenyan Activists

    NAIROBI — Nandi Senator Samson Cherargei has praised Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu for deporting Kenyan activists who traveled to Tanzania in solidarity with opposition leader Tundu Lissu, but suggested she should have gone further by detaining and prosecuting them.

    Speaking at the Senate on Wednesday, Cherargei accused the activists of exporting “bad manners and political disorder” from Kenya to Tanzania and called on President Suluhu to assist Kenya in disciplining them.

    “I want to thank her excellency Samia Suluhu for calling out activists who wanted to go and disrupt the peace in Tanzania. In fact, she should have detained and prosecuted them because they have taught this country bad manners; they have taught our people to insult, undermine and lose respect to the leadership of this country,” Cherargei said during the Senate session.

    Nandi Senator Samson Cherargei speaking during debate session.
    Nandi Senator Samson Cherargei speaking during debate session.

    The senator, who appeared visibly pleased with the deportation decision, further claimed that the activists are “funded by the enemies of Africa who want to destabilize the unity of most African countries.”

    “I want to ask President Suluhu to be very careful because these activists are funded by the enemies of Africa who want to destabilize the unity of most African countries. I want to ask President Suluhu that in the spirit of East Africa, they should assist us to discipline some of these activists that have continued to destabilize Kenya,” he added.

    Deportation incident

    Several prominent Kenyan activists, including People’s Liberation Party leader Martha Karua and former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, were detained and deported from Tanzania on Sunday, May 18, 2025.

    They had traveled to attend the treason trial of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu.

    Other deported activists included Hanifa Adan, Hussein Khalid, Gloria Kimani, and Lynn Ngugi. According to reports, they were held at Julius Nyerere International Airport, some for hours without explanation, before being deported.

    Activist Boniface Mwangi also reported being harassed by armed men claiming to be police at his hotel in Dar es Salaam. His current whereabouts remain unknown.

    The activists had traveled to Tanzania to show solidarity with Tundu Lissu, who faces charges of inciting rebellion ahead of Tanzania’s October 2025 elections.

    Cherargei described Tanzania as “a very peaceful country” and endorsed President Suluhu’s stance on mutual respect between neighboring countries. He urged activists to stop “running around East Africa trying to meddle in the internal affairs” of other nations.

    The senator’s comments come amid growing tensions between civil society organizations and governments across East Africa, with activists increasingly facing challenges when attempting to monitor political developments in neighboring countries.

  • Transfer of Public Seal from Attorney General to Head of Public Service‬ Raises Constitutional Concerns

    Transfer of Public Seal from Attorney General to Head of Public Service‬ Raises Constitutional Concerns

    In a controversial move that legal experts are calling a “silent power grab,” the Kenyan government has transferred custody of the Public Seal from the Attorney General’s office to the Head of Public Service, raising significant constitutional concerns among lawmakers and civic leaders.

    The transfer, which occurred through an Amendment Act signed by President William Ruto last year, has been criticized as undermining national values of governance enshrined in the Kenyan Constitution.

    According to Article 10(2) of the Constitution, governance must adhere to values of sharing and devolution of power among other fundamental principles.

    Critics argue this transfer centralizes authority and weakens institutional checks that protect the country from questionable government deals.

    Former Attorney General Justin Muturi has said that “the country is living dangerously” with this change.

    “For decades, the Public Seal has ceremonially been kept under the custody of the Attorney General,” Muturi explained.m in an interview with local press.

    “The seal of government or executive functions gives legitimacy to government actions. This act ensures that they abide by the Constitution.”

    Justin Muturi
    Justin Muturi

    The Public Seal serves as a symbol of state authority and authenticates vital government documents. Without proper legal checks, concerns have emerged that this transfer could expose the nation to potentially problematic deals.

    Lawyer Gitobu Imanyara warned that documents can now be “taken to Sugoi, Dubai or anywhere to serve personal interests.”

    Government spokesperson Isaac Mwaura defended the move, saying it followed lawful procedure and doesn’t undermine the Attorney General’s constitutional mandate.

    “The Head of Public Service is the number one public servant in this country. He holds the Public Seal, executes the directives of the president, and oversees the daily operation of government,” Mwaura stated.

    The controversy extends beyond procedural concerns, with implications for Kenya’s governance structure.

    By removing the seal from the AG’s chain of custody, critics argue the government has created a loophole for “dubious deals” without proper legal vetting.

    A Memorandum of Understanding reportedly signed in Dubai last December involving a sanctioned Russian oligarch and over $1 billion has been cited as an example of why proper oversight matters.

    Supporters of the transfer maintain it will streamline decision-making and improve efficiency, while opponents view it as an unconstitutional consolidation of power that revives the controversial role of the Chief Administrative Secretary, previously struck down by the High Court.

  • Kenya Writes To US Senator Over Remarks On Kenya-China Relations

    Kenya Writes To US Senator Over Remarks On Kenya-China Relations

    Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has revealed that he has written to US Senator Jim Risch to clarify Kenya’s stance in the wake of President William Ruto’s recent state visit to China.

    This comes as he affirmed Kenya’s position that it is a sovereign state and has the right to choose its friends and determine with whom it associates.

    Speaking during a TV interview on Tuesday, Mudavadi emphasized that when Kenya engages or holds talks with any country, it should not be taken out of context.

    “I have formally written to the senator explaining Kenya’s position and getting him to appreciate the context in which the statement he is alluding to was made,” he said.

    US Senator Jim Risch has accused Kenya of aiding Sudan's Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in legitimising its rule under the guise of peace talks, escalating diplomatic tensions between Washington and Nairobi.
    US Senator Jim Risch has accused Kenya of aiding Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in legitimising its rule under the guise of peace talks, escalating diplomatic tensions between Washington and Nairobi.

    In his letter, Mudavadi said he also extended an invitation to the senator to visit Kenya “if he pleases” to have a more detailed conversation.

    He stated that the sentiments expressed by the senator do not imply strained relations between Kenya and the US, suggesting that this was a personal view.

    During his visit to China last month, President Ruto had an opportunity to address students at Peking University, where he stated that Kenya and China were the “co-architects of a new world order”.

    This was interpreted by some as a signal of geopolitical shifts toward new superpowers like China.

    According to the Republican senator, the statement was not only an alignment with China but also demonstrated allegiance to Beijing.

    “Relying on leaders who embrace Beijing so openly is an error. It’s time to reassess our relationship with Kenya and others who forge tight bonds with China,” said Risch.

    He added that it was time to reassess their relationship with Kenya and others who maintain close ties with China.

    The PCS, who also doubles as Foreign Affairs Cabinet Secretary, clarified that regardless of Kenya’s size or status, “there is one thing that we must always safeguard — the sovereignty of our nation”.

    “It is a principle that we must always uphold,” he said.

  • Senator Orwoba Officially Loses Senate Seat After Speaker Kingi Declares Vacancy

    Senator Orwoba Officially Loses Senate Seat After Speaker Kingi Declares Vacancy

    Nominated Senator Gloria Orwoba has lost her position in the Kenyan Senate following her expulsion from the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) party. Senate Speaker Amason Kingi officially declared her seat vacant in a Kenya Gazette notice published today, marking the end of Orwoba’s tenure.

    The UDA party expelled Senator Orwoba on May 19, 2025, following accusations that she contravened the party’s Code of Conduct.

    According to a statement by UDA Secretary General Hassan Omar, the party’s Disciplinary Committee resolved to terminate her membership with immediate effect.

    “Pursuant to Article 29 of the UDA Party Constitution, and having exhaustively deliberated on the matters before it, the Party’s Disciplinary Committee has resolved that Senator Gloria Orwoba be expelled from the membership of the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) Party with immediate effect,” reads the statement.

    The National Executive Committee (NEC) of the party adopted and ratified this decision during its meeting on the same day. Following the expulsion, the UDA party has formally notified both the Registrar of Political Parties (RPP) and the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC).

    The gazettement of the vacancy comes after Justice Lawrence Mugambi rejected Orwoba’s attempt to block her expulsion from the Senate, citing procedural issues in her legal challenge.

    Prior to her expulsion, Senator Orwoba had presented a court order to UDA seeking to stop the disciplinary action against her. However, the party proceeded with the process, leading to her removal.

    The UDA party has already nominated Consolata Wabwire Wakwabubi from Kimilili Constituency, Bungoma County, to fill the vacancy left by Orwoba. The party has written to the Senate Speaker to initiate the formal process of Orwoba’s removal and subsequent replacement.

    The disciplinary action against Orwoba stemmed from a complaint filed by Festus Omwamba and Henry Muriithi (Disciplinary Complaint No. 2 of 2025).

    While specific details of the complaint were not fully disclosed in the party’s statement, reports indicate tensions arose after Orwoba attended former Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i’s homecoming event.

    When questioned about her attendance at the event, Orwoba defended her actions.

    This led to further friction with the party, culminating in her summons to appear before the disciplinary committee at the Hustler Centre, where she arrived wearing a UDA party polo T-shirt.

    In justifying the expulsion, Secretary General Omar stated that while the UDA Party upholds the values of freedom of expression and association as enshrined in the Constitution of Kenya 2010, “fidelity and loyalty to Party ideals are fundamental.”

    The statement further clarified that Senator Orwoba “cannot continue to play for two political teams simultaneously,” suggesting that her actions were viewed as contradictory to the party’s interests and direction.

    With the seat now officially vacant, the IEBC is expected to begin the process of confirming Wakwabubi’s nomination in accordance with electoral laws.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​