Author: Agencies

  • Sudan Wants RSF Declared Terrorist Group

    Sudan Wants RSF Declared Terrorist Group

    The Sudanese government has urged the United States to designate the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) a terrorist organisation. Sudan’s foreign ministry, in a statement issued on Tuesday, said all groups that violate international humanitarian law and commit terrorism, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in the country should be designated as terrorist groups.

    “The US should therefore designate the RSF militia as a terrorist group, given its proven crimes and documented violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and terrorism,” the statement read in part.

    The government’s demand comes a day after the US designated the Sudanese branch of the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation, labelling it a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) and planning to formalise it as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) starting March 16, 2026. The United States accused the group of widespread violence and links to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).

    RSF members. Credit: Al Jazeera
    RSF members. Credit: Al Jazeera

    The RSF was formed around 2013, evolving from the Janjaweed militias, which were infamous for committing atrocities during the Darfur conflict.

    Initially, they were government-backed militias used to fight rebel groups in Darfur and maintain control in conflict regions, but they have now grown into a powerful political and economic actor, controlling resources such as gold mining in Sudan.

    The group has also been accused of war crimes and human rights abuses, especially during the Darfur conflict and crackdowns on protests in Khartoum.

    A United Nations inquiry found the RSF to have committed acts of genocide in Darfur.

  • Madagascar Leader Michael Randrianirina Dissolves Government In Surprise Move

    Madagascar Leader Michael Randrianirina Dissolves Government In Surprise Move

    Madagascar’s military ruler Col Michael Randrianirina has dissolved the government unexpectedly, dismissing the prime minister and the entire cabinet, according to a statement from his spokesperson.

    “The government has ceased its functions” it said, adding that Randrianirina will appoint a new prime minister “in line with the provisions stipulated by the constitution”.

    No reason was given for the move.

    Randrianirina seized power last October from Andry Rajoelina, following weeks of youth-led protests on the Indian Ocean island. Rajoelina had been elected president for a third term in a disputed poll in 2023.

    The demonstrations were over persistent power and water shortages, culminating in the army siding with the demonstrators.

    Randrianirina has pledged to call new elections within two years.

    Last December, the regional bloc, the Southern African Development Community (Sadc), directed Madagascar’s military authorities to submit a roadmap for restoring democracy including plans for fresh elections by the end of February.

    But in a surprise on Monday, Randrianirina sacked his entire government and assigned permanent secretaries to run ministries’ day-to-day operations until a new cabinet is formed.

    Randrianirina has not explained the motivation for the mass sackings, but leaders of the Gen Z movement, whose grassroots mobilisation helped bring the military leader to power, have called for more inclusiveness in the transition process and greater representation in decision-making structures.

    Activist groups, calling themselves Gen Z and Gen Y movements, had recently issued a 72-hour ultimatum for Randrianirina’s resignation, citing frustration with his performance, local media reported.

    Businessman Herintsalama Rajaonarivelo had been appointed prime minister in October in an effort to bridge the divide between military leadership and civilian government.

    The the Gen Z movement leaders rejected his appointment at the time, saying it was made in a “non-transparent” manner and “without consultation”.

    The group demanded to know how Rajaonarivelo was selected given what it said were his connection to the previous government.

    They then said that the decision “runs contrary to the desired structural change” the movement was seeking.

    Monday’s dissolution of the government could mark a significant shift in the country’s political landscape with the military leader seeking to establish a new administration.

  • Oil Prices Fall After Trump Warns Iran Over Strait Of Hormuz

    Oil Prices Fall After Trump Warns Iran Over Strait Of Hormuz

    MAR 10 – Oil prices fell on Tuesday after US President Donald Trump warned Iran to not block a shipping route crucial to global energy supplies.

    “If Iran does anything that stops the flow of Oil within the Strait of Hormuz, they will be hit by the United States of America TWENTY TIMES HARDER than they have been hit thus far,” he said on Social media.

    In late morning trade in Asia, Brent crude was 6% lower at $93.05 (£69.33) and Nymex Light Sweet was down 6.1% at $88.96.

    Oil had reached almost $120 a barrel on Monday over fears that the US-Israeli war with Iran would cause lengthy disruption to supplies from the Middle East, but fell back after Trump suggested that the war could end soon.

    “We took a little excursion because we felt we had to do that to get rid of some evil. Then, I think you’ll see it’s going to be a short-term excursion,” Trump said during a news conference in Florida.

    The fall in oil prices on Tuesday has given traders a moment to “exhale”, but energy markets remain in a state of “total tug-of-war”, said Alberto Bellorin from oil and gas investment firm InterCapital Energy.

    Oil trading will “remain incredibly twitchy” and prices are likely to spike if the conflict escalates and fall if it seems to be easing, he said.

    Share prices in Asia made gains as concerns about the economic impact of he conflict eased.

    Japan’s Nikkei 225 was 3.3% higher, while the Hang Seng in Hong Kong was up by 1.7% and South Korea’s Kospi gained 6.2%.

    Stock markets in the region were hit hard the previous day on investor concerns that disruptions in the Gulf could mean higher inflation and rising interest rates.

    The Strait of Hormuz is crucial to the global energy market as around a fifth of the world’s oil passes through the narrow waterway.

    While the price of oil has fallen from Monday’s peak it is still around 20% higher than where they were before the US and Israel launched airstrikes on Iran just over a week ago, said Park Kee Hyun from the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

    Prices will remain “volatile” as the firms will charge a premium for shipments to account for any risk of the situation worsening, Park said.

    Trump’s comments may suggest the war may end soon, but the bigger question is whether those remarks are followed by concrete changes in the conflict zone, he added.

    G7 nations on Monday said it is ready to take “necessary measures” to address the global supply of energy in the light of surging oil prices.

    A meeting between G7 leaders and the International Energy Agency (IEA) ended without a final decision on whether the nations would release oil from stockpiles, though the matter was discussed.

    UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves said on Monday the UK used the meeting to urge for “immediate de-escalation” in the Middle East and guaranteed security for vessels in the region.

    She said: “I stand ready to support a co-ordinated release of collective IEA oil reserves.”

    BBC

  • Putin Says Energy Crisis Has Arrived But Russia Is Ready To Work With Europe

    Putin Says Energy Crisis Has Arrived But Russia Is Ready To Work With Europe

    Summary

    • Putin says oil output relying on Hormuz Strait could stop in a month
    • Russia says it is ready to supply oil and gas to Europe
    • Putin says Russian firms should make use of situation
    • Putin says high oil prices may be ​temporary

    MOSCOW, March 9 (Reuters) – Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Monday that the U.S.-Israeli war ‌on Iran had triggered a global energy crisis and cautioned that oil production dependent on transport through the Strait of Hormuz could soon come to a halt.

    Putin said that Russia — the world’s second-largest oil exporter and holder of the biggest natural gas reserves — was ready to work ​again with European customers if they wanted to return to long-term cooperation.

    Western powers, however, have spent the past ​four years sharply reducing their reliance on Russian oil and gas in response to Moscow’s ⁠war in Ukraine and subsequent EU and G7 sanctions.

    The loss of the European market has deprived Russia of its ​most lucrative customers and forced it to sell oil and gas at steep discounts to Asia.

    Speaking at a televised meeting with ​government officials and the heads of Russia’s leading oil and gas producers, Putin said that Russia had repeatedly warned that destabilising the Middle East could lead to an energy crisis with grave implications for the global economy — a turn of events he said had now ​materialised.

    Oil prices exceeded $100 per barrel on Monday to reach peaks unseen since 2022 as the Strait of Hormuz, which accounts ​for roughly a fifth of global oil and liquefied natural gas flows, has been effectively closed due to the Iran war.

    “Oil production ‌dependent on ⁠the Strait of Hormuz risks halting completely within the next month. It has already begun to decline, and storage facilities in the region are filling with oil that cannot be transported…is extremely difficult to transport, or is extremely expensive to transport,” Putin said.

    He said Russian companies should take advantage of the current situation in the Middle East, though he noted ​that the spike in prices ​was probably temporary. Oil ⁠and gas revenues make up around a quarter of total federal budget proceeds.

    G7 nations said on Monday they were prepared to implement “necessary measures” in response to surging global oil prices, ​but stopped short of committing to release emergency reserves.

    “We’re ready to work with Europeans too. ​But we ⁠need some signals from them that they’re ready and willing to work with us and will ensure this sustainability and stability,” Putin said.

    Last week he instructed the government to consider switching remaining Russian oil and gas flows away from Europe, before the ⁠European Union ​starts enforcing its decision to completely ban Russian fossil fuels.

    Before the Ukraine ​war, Europe was buying more than 40% of its gas from Russia, but combined sales of pipeline gas and LNG from Russia accounted for only ​13% of total EU imports in 2025.

  • Trump Hints End Of Iran War In Sight, Saying Operations ‘Very Complete’

    Trump Hints End Of Iran War In Sight, Saying Operations ‘Very Complete’

    President Donald Trump indicated for the first time Monday that US military operations in Iran could be coming to an end, saying the war was “very complete” and progressing ahead of schedule.

    The war had sent stock markets slumping and oil prices soaring again on Monday as Tehran, under new leader Mojtaba Khamenei, fired a new barrage of missiles at its Gulf neighbours and signalled that the strategic Strait of Hormuz would likely remain closed.

    But Wall Street vaulted into positive territory Monday after Trump’s remarks, despite the lack of details on any solution to the conflict still raging in the Middle East.

    “I think the war is very complete, pretty much. They have no navy, no communications, they’ve got no air force,” Trump told CBS News by phone, repeating battle damage assessments that he has given in previous days.

    Trump told the US broadcaster that the United States was “very far” ahead of his initially stated timeframe for the war of four or five weeks.

    He is set to give a press conference shortly at around 5:30 pm (2130 GMT) in the ballroom of his Doral golf club near Miami.

    On the first day in power for the 56-year-old son of slain leader Ali Khamenei, Iranian troops mustered a fresh wave of missile and drone attacks on Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, the UAE and Israel.

    Another missile was also fired at NATO member Turkey, the second such incident in five days, with the alliance’s air defences intercepting it before it could hit its target.

    With the Strait of Hormuz off Iran blocked for almost all oil tankers, the price of benchmark crude oil contracts rocketed past $100 a barrel on Monday — their highest levels since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 — before edging back slightly.

    French President Emmanuel Macron said that his country and its allies were working on a “purely defensive” mission to reopen the strait, through which nearly 20 percent of the world’s crude oil usually transits.

    The mission would be aimed at escorting ships “after the end of the hottest phase of the conflict”, but experts say it would mean putting navy vessels at risk of incoming fire from the nearby Iranian coast.

    Kamal Kharazi, a foreign policy adviser to Iran’s supreme leader, told CNN that Tehran was calculating that “the economic pressure will be beefed up to the extent that other countries intervene” to end the war.

    Benchmark oil prices are up 40-50 percent since the US and Israel launched their attack on Iran on February 28, while stock markets around the world are down, hitting pension funds and savings.

    Inflation caused by a sustained oil shock would also push up the price of goods for consumers everywhere.

    Queues at petrol stations have been seen as far afield as Vietnam and the Philippines as drivers anticipate higher prices, while Hungary and Croatia in the EU announced fuel price caps.

    – Rallies –

    Iran faced a fresh blitz of US and Israeli strikes after its Assembly of Experts, the top clerical body, appointed its first new supreme leader in 37 years.

    Iranian state media carried images of tens of thousands of people celebrating Mojtaba Khamenei’s selection in central Tehran on Monday, many carrying his picture.

    Iran’s rebel Houthi allies in Yemen and the Hezbollah armed group in Lebanon pledged allegiance, while Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday promised “unwavering support”.

    Unconfirmed US media reports over the weekend said that Moscow has been providing targeting intelligence to the Islamic republic’s military.

    Trump told the New York Post newspaper he was “not happy” about Khamenei’s appointment, while Israel’s foreign ministry called him a “tyrant”.

    Ali Ansari, a professor of Iranian history at the University of St Andrews in Scotland, told AFP the new supreme leader was a hardliner who had “been involved in all the most violent repressions that have taken place over the last 15-16 years”.

    Ali Vaez, of the International Crisis Group (ICG) think tank, said the appointment was intended to send a defiant message that Trump’s war “has only replaced one Khamenei with another”.

    – Oil risks –

    Oil traders, policymakers and central bankers are all watching the Middle East for news about Gulf energy infrastructure, which is crucial for the world economy.

    About 10 vessels in or near the Strait of Hormuz have come under attack since Iran blocked the waterway in retaliation for the US-Israeli attack, shipping experts say.

    Global shipping giant MSC announced that it was formally halting some export shipments from the Gulf, meaning goods sitting on ships would be unloaded.

    Following strikes on Bahrain’s Al Ma’ameer oil facility that ignited a fire, the country’s state-owned energy company Bapco joined its counterparts in Qatar and Kuwait in declaring “force majeure” — a warning that events beyond its control may lead it to miss export targets.

    The Saudi defence ministry said Monday it had thwarted a drone attack targeting an oil field in the kingdom’s east, near the Emirati border.

    – ‘Resistance’ –

    In Israel, around 10 explosions were audible in Tel Aviv after the military announced it had detected missiles inbound from Iran.

    At least one Israeli was killed when he was hit by shrapnel, emergency services said.

    The multi-front war also intensified in Lebanon, which was dragged into the conflict last week when Israel and Hezbollah began trading fire.

    Lebanese President Joseph Aoun on Monday accused Hezbollah of working to “collapse” the state, while the head of the group’s parliamentary bloc said it had “no other option to preserve honour, pride and dignity than the option of resistance”.

    Lebanese authorities said on Monday that Israel’s attacks since March 2 have killed at least 486 people and wounded at least 1,313.

  • Russia-Backed Hackers Breach Signal, WhatsApp Accounts Of Officials, Journalists, Netherlands Warns

    Russia-Backed Hackers Breach Signal, WhatsApp Accounts Of Officials, Journalists, Netherlands Warns

    • Hackers have likely gained access to sensitive information
    • Hackers use fake Signal Support chatbots to access accounts

    AMSTERDAM, March 9 (Reuters) – Russian-backed hackers have launched ​a global cyber campaign to gain access to Signal and WhatsApp accounts used ‌by officials, military personnel and journalists, two intelligence agencies in the Netherlands warned on Monday.

    Users are persuaded in chats initiated by the hackers to divulge security verification and pin codes, giving them ​access to personal accounts and group chats, they said in a statement.

    “The Russian ​hackers have likely gained access to sensitive information,” the General Dutch ⁠Intelligence Agency (AIVD) and Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) said.

    “Targets and victims of the ​campaign include Dutch government employees” and journalists, the agencies said.

    The chat apps offering end-to-end encryption ​are popular with government officials for sharing confidential or classified information, making them “the ideal place for malicious actors to try to capture sensitive information,” they said.

    WhatsApp, in a reaction sent to Reuters, said ​users should never share their six-digit code with others and that it continued to ​build ways to protect people from online threats.

    Signal said on social media that the targeted attacks ‌were “executed via ⁠sophisticated phishing campaigns, designed to trick users into sharing information” and that its encryption and infrastructure had not been compromised.

    USERS PERSUADED TO DIVULGE SECURITY CODES

    The hackers most frequently masquerade as a Signal Support chatbot to induce targets to divulge the codes, enabling them ​to take control of ​the accounts, the ⁠statement said.

    Another method is to use the ‘linked devices’ function within Signal, it said.

    Contacts appearing twice in a user’s contact list, or ​numbers showing up as ‘deleted account’ could indicate that an account has ​been compromised, ⁠the agencies said.

    Dutch authorities issued a cyber advisory notifying government colleagues of the vulnerability and providing assistance to eliminate the threat, a spokesman said, citing the joint operation with the ⁠AIVD ​general intelligence service.

    “Despite their end-to-end encryption option, messaging apps ​such as Signal and WhatsApp should not be used as channels for classified, confidential or sensitive information,” said ​MIVD director, Vice-Admiral Peter Reesink.

  • After Venezuela Blow, Iran Supply Risks Test China’s Oil Strategy

    After Venezuela Blow, Iran Supply Risks Test China’s Oil Strategy

    – ‘About 50 million barrels of Iranian crude are currently sitting offshore China and Malaysia, providing a supply cushion to any disruption,’ says Kpler analyst Matt Smith

    – Halt in Iranian flows could force Chinese refiners to sharply cut processing rates or seek more expensive replacement crude on global markets, according to Argus Media analyst Tom Reed

    Tensions in the Middle East have pushed oil prices higher and cast new uncertainty over Iranian crude flows, a development that experts say could ripple through China’s refining sector just as another key source of discounted oil, Venezuela, becomes increasingly constrained.

    China is the world’s largest crude oil importer, bringing in roughly 11.6 million barrels per day (bpd) in 2025, according to the Center on Global Energy Policy (CGEP) at Columbia University. Analysts estimate that around 2.6 million bdp of these imports consist of discounted or sanctioned crude, including approximately 1.38 million bpd from Iran, making Tehran one of China’s most significant external suppliers.

    These discounted barrels have become particularly important for independent refiners, often referred to as “teapot” refineries, which operate largely in the eastern province of Shandong. Unlike large state-owned companies, these installations typically rely on lower-cost crude supplies to remain competitive in domestic fuel markets.

    But the supply cushion is now under pressure from two directions. Iran’s exports face growing risks as its war with Israel and the US escalates, while shipments from Venezuela – another key source of heavy discounted crude for Chinese refiners – have already begun to shrink after Washington captured President Nicolas Maduro and diverted Venezuelan oil toward American markets.

    Iranian crude flows provide critical supply

    Despite the potential risks, as Iran faces large-scale US-Israel attacks, including strikes on oil depots, analysts say China’s supply chain currently includes buffers that could mitigate the immediate impact of any disruption.

    Matt Smith, lead oil analyst at energy analytics firm Kpler, said a significant volume of Iranian crude is already positioned near China in storage or transit. “About 50 million barrels of Iranian crude are currently sitting offshore China and Malaysia, providing a supply cushion to any disruption,” Smith told Anadolu.

    He added that Iran increased shipments ahead of the recent escalation in the Middle East, meaning additional cargoes are already en route to Chinese buyers.

    These barrels could help Chinese refiners manage short-term supply disruptions if exports from Iran were temporarily interrupted.

    Smith, however, added that refiners have already begun adjusting their crude sourcing strategies amid shifting market conditions.

    “China has increasingly been pulling in more Russian crude in recent months, given growing discounts as India has dialed back purchases,” he said.

    According to him, Russia has become the leading supplier for Shandong since late last year, overtaking Iran as refiners search for alternative discounted barrels.

    Middle Eastern supply routes remain key

    While disruptions to Iranian exports would affect certain refiners, analysts say the larger concern lies in the stability of Middle Eastern supply routes, including the Strait of Hormuz, which is effectively closed to oil shipping due to the war.

    Smith said that nearly half of China’s seaborne crude imports originate from the Middle East, making the region a critical pillar of its energy security.

    “Supply disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz are a much, much bigger issue than the loss of Venezuelan crude,” he said.

    The strait carries about 20% of the world’s oil shipments and is considered one of the most important energy chokepoints. Any sustained disruption could affect not only Iranian exports but also shipments from other major Gulf producers that supply Asian markets.

    Independent refineries most exposed

    The most immediate effects of any Iranian supply disruption would likely be felt by independent refineries clustered in eastern China.

    Tom Reed, China crude analyst at Argus Media, said these facilities depend heavily on Iranian oil as a core part of their feedstock mix.

    “Shandong independent refineries process around 2.5 million bpd of crude, so Iranian supplies are absolutely central to their operations,” Reed told Anadolu. “It would be extremely difficult for the teapots to replace the 1.3 million bpd of Iranian crude they currently receive.”

    These refiners have historically relied on discounted crude from sanctioned producers to remain profitable in a competitive domestic market. In recent years, Iranian supplies have become one of the most important components of that strategy.

    Limited alternatives for refiners

    If Iranian flows were interrupted, Reed said independent refiners would face difficult choices in securing replacement supplies.

    “They would either have to cut runs drastically or compete in the global market for replacement grades,” he said.

    Before 2022, Shandong refiners were among the largest buyers of Brazilian crude, which could once again become an alternative source if Iranian shipments were disrupted.

    However, Reed said, switching to those supplies would come with a significant cost increase.

    “That would mean accepting costs of around $15 per barrel higher than what they currently face,” he said.

    Such a price increase could quickly erode refining margins, particularly for smaller facilities that already operate on relatively thin profit margins.

    Potential refinery run cuts

    Reed said the loss of discounted Iranian and Venezuelan crude could force refiners to adjust their operating rates.

    “Both refinery run cuts and potential shutdowns are likely if discounted Iranian and Venezuelan crude becomes unavailable,” he said.

    Lower refinery runs could then tighten fuel supply in domestic markets and push prices higher. “This would force up prices for gasoline and diesel in China,” Reed added.

    But structural changes in China’s transport sector may limit the long-term impact of higher fuel prices.

    Demand for gasoline and diesel has already been gradually declining as electric vehicles and alternative fuel technologies expand across the world’s second-largest economy.

    “Demand for both fuels is currently being destroyed at the rate of about 200,000 bpd each year due to increasing use of electric vehicles and electric or gas-fueled trucking,” Reed said.

    Petrochemicals likely less affected

    Despite potential pressure on fuel markets, analysts say China’s petrochemical sector is less exposed to disruptions affecting independent refineries.

    According to Reed, much of China’s petrochemical feedstock is supplied through large state-owned companies rather than independent refiners.

    While Shandong refiners produce some petrochemical products such as ethylene and aromatics, the majority of China’s output comes from major state-owned firms or specialized cracking facilities that process imported naphtha.

    As a result, disruptions affecting discounted crude supplies would likely have a greater impact on transport fuels than on petrochemical production.

    Despite the potential risks associated with Iranian supply disruptions, analysts note that China maintains a relatively diversified crude import portfolio compared with many other Asian economies.

    “China is the largest single market for Brazilian crude, West African crude and Canadian crude, giving it more supply options than other countries in the region,” Reed said.

    Anadolu Agency

  • Khamenei’s Tehran Bunker: 5 Kilometers Of Tunnels Under Schools and Clinics

    Khamenei’s Tehran Bunker: 5 Kilometers Of Tunnels Under Schools and Clinics

    Israeli military images of an underground tunnel complex attributed to Ali Khamenei appear to confirm long-circulating rumors of a network stretching several kilometers beneath central Tehran, under medical centers, schools, and residential neighborhoods.

    On March 5, shortly after heavy strikes targeted areas near the Pasteur government complex in central Tehran – a district that houses the Iranian presidency and several key government offices – the Israeli military published a video depicting what it described as Khamenei’s underground bunker system.

    The complex resembles a subterranean city. According to the video and accompanying imagery, the facility appears to have been used as a secure shelter for Iran’s leadership and may still be used by remaining officials following Khamenei’s death.

    A tunnel network stretching nearly five kilometers

    Analysis of the imagery released by the Israeli military, using publicly available online mapping tools, suggests the tunnel network extends close to five kilometers in length.

    To understand the scale of the project, it helps to compare it with ordinary infrastructure construction in Tehran.

    According to statements by Tehran mayor Alireza Zakani and members of the Tehran City Council, building one kilometer of metro tunnel in Tehran currently costs between 5,000 and 6,000 billion tomans – roughly $30-36 million at an exchange rate of about 166,000 tomans per dollar.

    This estimate covers only the excavation and structural work. It does not include interior finishing, equipment, ventilation systems, or other underground facilities.

    Based on those figures, building five kilometers of underground tunnel would cost about 25,000 to 30,000 billion tomans, or roughly $150-180 million.

    Given the secrecy and security requirements surrounding such a project, the actual cost was likely significantly higher than that of a standard transportation tunnel.

    Under normal conditions, tunneling contractors in Tehran can excavate around 10 meters per day. At that pace, building a five-kilometer tunnel system would take at least 500 days – roughly 17 months.

    Considering the classified nature of the project and the additional infrastructure involved, the construction timeline may have been considerably longer.

    The core of the complex: beneath a medical facility

    The video appears to place the central section of the bunker complex southwest of the presidential compound in the Pasteur district.

    The site sits directly beneath the Shahid Shourideh Medical Center, a clinic affiliated with Iran’s Ministry of Agriculture. The facility has operated since 1985 and effectively functions as part of the broader Pasteur government complex.

    Based on the height of vehicle ramps and the dimensions of vehicles visible in the imagery, the central installation appears to be located 40 to 50 meters underground.

    From there, the tunnel system extends northwest toward another entrance near the end of Rajabi Street, roughly 200 meters from the Shourideh hospital complex.

    Shahid Shourideh Medical Center, which is affiliated with Iran’s Ministry of Agriculture, sits above what appears to be the main core of Khamenei’s bunker complex, estimated to be 40 to 50 meters underground.

    Easternmost entrance: next to an elementary school

    The easternmost known entrance to the tunnel network appears to be located in the Sheikh Hadi neighborhood, along Valiasr Street, beneath the Jami multi-story parking garage.

    This parking structure stands directly beside Hejrat Girls’ Elementary School, while Saheb a-Zaman Boys’ Elementary School lies about 100 meters away.

    At the northern edge of the network sits another multi-story garage known as the 12 Farvardin Parking Complex, located near the intersection of Jomhouri Eslami Street and Danesh Street.

    Both parking structures were inaugurated on December 4, 2017, as part of a paired urban development project attended by Tehran’s then-mayor Mohammad Najafi.

    One entrance to the tunnel network appears to lie beneath a building opposite the Karimeh Ahl-e Beit clinic near Hor Square in central Tehran.

    An entrance beneath a mosque, beside a school

    Another entrance appears west of Pasteur Square, between Hor Metro Station and the square itself.

    This access point lies beneath Tohid Mosque. Adjacent to the mosque is a building, and behind it stands Shahid Kadkhodaei Boys’ Elementary School.

    Roughly 200 meters away, another possible entrance is located on the southwestern side of Pasteur Square, along a street that houses the AJA University of Command and Staff – the staff college of the Islamic Republic of Iran Army.

    Nearby are the Karimeh Ahl-e Beit dental clinic and medical clinic, as well as the 29 Farvardin Pharmacy, which is affiliated with Iran’s army.

    The easternmost entrance to the tunnel complex appears to lie beneath the Jami multi-story parking garage, directly next to Hejrat Girls’ Elementary School.

    Western entrance beside a football school

    The westernmost identified entrance to the tunnel network appears to lie beneath a small building near an office responsible for issuing hunting weapon permits.

    Immediately next to the building, sharing a wall, is a football training school, while dense residential complexes surround the area.

    This location sits near the intersection of Sepah and Kamali streets, along Kashan Street, at the end of Fourth Street.

    The tunnels also lie close to the Yas and Namjou residential complexes, which are affiliated with the Iranian army.

    One of the entrances to the tunnel network appears to lie beneath a mosque next to Shahid Kadkhodaei Boys’ Elementary School.

    Iran International 

  • Rihanna’s Beverly Hills Home Hit By Gunfire, Police Say

    Rihanna’s Beverly Hills Home Hit By Gunfire, Police Say

    The Beverly Hills home of pop superstar Rihanna has been hit by gunfire, police say.

    Officers from the Los Angeles Police Department responded to reports of gunfire at 13:15 local time (21:15 GMT) on Sunday. A suspect was located and taken into custody.

    A police official told the BBC’s US partner, CBS News, that the home targeted belonged to Rihanna and that assault rifle casings were found at the scene.

    No one was injured in the incident. Rihanna was in the mansion at the time, a law enforcement source told the Los Angeles Times.

    Police say the suspect, a woman in her 30s, stopped in a car outside the home and fired seven shots before speeding away.

    Her vehicle was located about eight miles (12km) away from the singer’s home, where the woman was taken into custody. She has not yet been publicly identified.

    Last September the star gave birth to her third child, a girl, with partner A$AP Rocky.

    The couple, who also share two sons Riot and RZA, announced Rihanna’s latest pregnancy at last year’s Met Gala.

    The couple’s baby news was not the first time they made headlines in 2025. In February, A$AP Rocky was found not guilty of firing a gun at a former friend, in a trial that saw Rihanna bring her two sons to court.

    The Barbados-born celebrity, whose real name is Robyn Fenty, shot to prominence in the early 2000s with hits like Pon de Replay and Umbrella. She recently celebrated 20 years since the release of her first album.

    During that time, Rihanna has launched multiple businesses, including her popular makeup range Fenty Beauty and a lingerie company. The 37-year-old’s net worth has been estimated by Forbes at over a billion dollars.

    The BBC has contacted Rihanna’s representatives for comment.

    BBC

  • Mojtaba Khamenei: The Shadow Prince Who Rose To Became Iran’s Supreme Leader

    Mojtaba Khamenei: The Shadow Prince Who Rose To Became Iran’s Supreme Leader

    Mojtaba Khamenei, long known as the discreet and powerful son of slain Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was announced early Monday as Iran’s new Supreme Leader at a time when the country is at war and Israel has openly vowed to target any successor to his father.

    Iran’s Assembly of Experts in a statement introduced Mojtaba Khamenei as the new leader of the Islamic Republic, five days after Iran International first reported that the body had selected him under pressure from the Revolutionary Guards.

    For decades Mojtaba operated largely out of public view while building deep ties across the Islamic Republic’s political and security apparatus. His rise marks the formal emergence of a figure who had already been widely regarded as one of the most influential actors behind the scenes of Iran’s ruling establishment.

    Mojtaba, the second son of Ali Khamenei, has long been considered the only member of his family with clear political ambitions. His younger brother, Masoud, worked only in administrative roles within their father’s office, while his other two brothers and two sisters are not known to have held political or bureaucratic positions.

    Born in 1969 in Mashhad, Mojtaba continued his education in Tehran at the prestigious Alavi High School, which produced many of the Islamic Republic’s elite, including former foreign minister Javad Zarif. The school’s dean, Kamal Kharrazi, later became one of Ali Khamenei’s senior political advisers.

    After graduating, Mojtaba began religious studies in Tehran before moving to Qom to pursue seminary education. In recent years, he has taught dars-e kharij — the highest level of jurisprudential instruction and a prerequisite for attaining the rank of mujtahid — at the Qom Seminary.

    Mojtaba married Zahra Haddad-Adel, daughter of former parliamentary speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel. Zahra and one of their children were killed in the February 28 attack on Ali Khamenei’s residence. The couple had three children.

    Because Mojtaba operated almost entirely behind the scenes under strict security, official information about him remained scarce, and unofficial reporting has often been fragmentary.

    He held no formal executive or elected position for much of his career, yet he was widely believed to wield significant influence within the Office of the Supreme Leader and to oversee parts of his father’s administrative network.

    Political orientation and policy views

    A devoted pupil of Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, the ideological architect of the ultraconservative Paydari Party, Mojtaba has long been aligned with Iran’s hardline faction. Analysts describe him as an advocate of a “unified state” in which appointed institutions overshadow elected bodies.

    This model was implemented most clearly during the presidency of Ebrahim Raisi, when moderate conservatives such as Ali Larijani were marginalized and gradually pushed out of the political arena. Mojtaba has also been widely regarded as a key supporter of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s rise in 2005 and his continuation in power after the disputed 2009 election.

    Mesbah-Yazdi, a fierce opponent of republicanism who died in 2021, argued that the Supreme Leader should be appointed without regard for public consent. Mojtaba has embraced this worldview, supporting strong clerical authority and the exclusion of moderates from power.

    He has also been widely viewed as the principal political and financial patron of the Paydari Front, whose members see him as the guarantor of the Islamic Republic’s revolutionary identity after his father.

    His foreign-policy outlook is deeply distrustful of the West, particularly the United States, and rooted in the doctrine of “resistance.” He strongly supports expanding Iran’s regional influence and strengthening the so-called “Axis of Resistance,” opposing compromise with Western governments.

    Position on protests

    Although Mojtaba has rarely spoken publicly, political reporting has consistently portrayed him as favoring a forceful, security-driven response to domestic unrest.

    During the 2009 Green Movement protests, he was widely identified as one of the key figures overseeing the crackdown. Demonstrators chanted directly against him for the first time, shouting: “Mojtaba, may you die before you see leadership.”

    During the protests of 2022, media outlets close to the regime again depicted him as central to maintaining internal stability.

    His supporters—including segments of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the paramilitary Basij, hardline clerics in Qom, institutions linked to the Supreme Leader’s Office, and state-aligned media—describe him as devout, discreet, and deeply knowledgeable about security affairs.

    Opponents, including much of the public and the political opposition, view him as a symbol of hereditary succession and criticize both his role in crackdowns and his opaque political influence.

    IRGC networks

    Mojtaba has maintained extensive ties to Iran’s intelligence and military structures. His network dates back to his youth, when he served in the IRGC’s Habib Battalion during the Iran–Iraq War—a unit that later produced many senior commanders, including Esmail Kowsari.

    He has had a particularly close relationship with Hossein Taeb, former head of the IRGC Intelligence Organization, and has widely been believed to exert influence over its operations. Mohammad Sarafraz, the former head of state television, wrote that Mojtaba and Taeb pressured him to allocate a large share of the broadcaster’s advertising revenue to their networks.

    Many Iranian analysts believe Mojtaba has played a decisive role in shaping senior IRGC appointments and key security positions.

    Implications of his leadership

    With Mojtaba Khamenei now formally assuming the role of Supreme Leader, observers say his leadership could reinforce the dominance of Iran’s hardline institutions and deepen the role of the security establishment within the political system.

    His extensive ties to the IRGC and his long-standing influence within the Supreme Leader’s office have given him a unique power base even before holding the title. For years he operated as one of the most consequential figures in Iran’s political hierarchy without occupying a formal public position.

    Now, as Supreme Leader, the “shadow prince” of the Islamic Republic has stepped fully into the center of power.

    Iran International 

  • PROFILE – Mojtaba Khamenei: Iran’s New Supreme Leader

    PROFILE – Mojtaba Khamenei: Iran’s New Supreme Leader

    Mojtaba Khamenei, a cleric long seen as one of the most influential yet least visible figures in Iran’s political establishment, has been named the country’s new supreme leader following the death of his father in a US-Israeli airstrike.

    The 56-year-old cleric was selected by Iran’s Assembly of Experts, an 88-member body responsible under the Constitution for appointing the country’s top political and religious authority. His selection followed the established constitutional procedure rather than a hereditary transfer of power, although his family lineage and proximity to the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei have long placed him at the center of speculation about succession.

    With his appointment, Mojtaba becomes the third supreme leader of the Islamic Republic since the 1979 revolution, inheriting leadership at a moment of intense regional conflict and domestic uncertainty.

    Early life and family background

    Mojtaba was born on Sept. 8, 1969 in the northeastern Iranian city of Mashhad, one of the country’s major religious centers. He is the second son of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who ruled Iran as supreme leader from 1989 until his killing over a week ago in US-Israeli airstrikes, as well as the grandson of cleric Sayyed Javad Khamenei.

    Growing up in a politically charged environment, Mojtaba witnessed the rise of his father as a key figure in the Islamic Revolution and later as president of Iran before assuming the role of supreme leader.

    He married Zahra Haddad-Adel, the daughter of Gholam-Ali Haddad-Adel, a prominent conservative politician and former parliament speaker who currently heads one of Iran’s leading cultural institutions.

    Zahra was also among those killed in the US-Israeli strike that targeted the Khamenei family’s residential compound in the capital Tehran. Mojtaba survived the attack, but also lost his mother, sister, brother-in-law, and nephews.

    Education and clerical training

    Like many figures within Iran’s clerical establishment, Mojtaba pursued his religious education in the city of Qom, the country’s leading center of Shia theological learning and home to the seminaries that train Iran’s clergy.

    He studied Islamic jurisprudence and theology under several prominent conservative scholars, including Ayatollah Mahmoud Hashemi Shahroudi, Ayatollah Lotfollah Safi Golpaygani, and Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi, an influential ideologue who mentored many conservative political figures in the Islamic Republic.

    According to Iranian analysts, Mojtaba has spent much of his career teaching at the Qom seminaries, including advanced jurisprudence classes known as dars-e kharej, considered the highest level of seminary education.

    Recent reports suggested he had temporarily suspended some of his classes for personal reasons, though this could not be independently confirmed.

    Despite decades in the clerical establishment, Mojtaba has never held a formal government post or served in an elected or executive office.

    Role and influence

    International media frequently portray Khamenei as an opaque figure with possible behind-the-scenes influence. His limited public visibility reinforces this image, as there are no extensive public speeches, interviews, or political manifestos laying out his positions.

    Mojtaba’s name has periodically surfaced in political discussions in Iran, usually in connection with presidential elections or speculation about which candidates he might support.

    Yet Mojtaba himself has rarely entered public political debates. His appearances have mostly been limited to official ceremonies, national commemorations, and religious gatherings covered by Iranian state media.

    The last time he was publicly seen was during a pro-government rally following widespread protests earlier this year.

    According to Iranian reports, Mojtaba also took part in the Iran-Iraq War during the late 1980s when his father was serving as president.

    He reportedly joined volunteer units as a young man, marking his first experience with military affairs.

    Some Western media outlets have also linked him to the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC), one of Iran’s most powerful institutions, though he does not hold any formal role there.

    Succession under threat

    Mojtaba Khamenei is taking the nation’s leadership mantle at one of the most volatile moments in modern Iranian history.

    The transition also unfolds under direct threats from Israel, whose leaders have vowed to assassinate any Iranian leader picked to succeed Khamenei.

    “Any leader selected by the Iranian terror regime to continue leading the plan for Israel’s destruction, threatening the United States, the free world and countries in the region, and suppressing the Iranian people, will be a certain target for assassination, no matter his name or where he hides,” Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz said on social media platform X.

    The threats underscore the extraordinary pressure surrounding the succession, placing Mojtaba at the center of a geopolitical confrontation that extends far beyond Iran’s borders.

    How different would he be from his father?

     

    This is the most consequential question for Iran. The answer is likely less different than many might expect.

    Ali Khamenei was a figure of the revolutionary generation. His authority rested on ideological legitimacy, decades spent amassing and consolidating power, and his ability to arbitrate between competing factions. Over time, he became the system’s final referee.

    Mojtaba Khamenei, by contrast, is often portrayed as a product of the security establishment, rather than a public theologian or statesman. He is known less for speeches or religious authority than for his influence and the networks he has built behind-the-scenes coordination.

    If that assessment is correct, the shift would be from a leader who balanced institutions to one who may lean more heavily on the might of the IRGC. This would deepen an existing trend toward the securitisation of Iranian politics.

    In a period of war and instability, regimes typically prioritise continuity and control. Mojtaba’s appeal to the establishment, therefore, appears to rest on several factors:

    • his close ties to the IRGC and intelligence networks
    • his long experience inside the supreme leader’s office
    • his ideological alignment with hardline positions sceptical of reform and Western engagement.

    A figure trusted by the most powerful security institutions also reduces the chance of power struggles or fragmentation at the top.

    What might this mean for the war?

    A new supreme leader rarely produces an abrupt ideological shift, especially during a military conflict. Continuity is the more likely outcome.

    Mojtaba Khamenei’s profile suggests a more security-centred style of leadership with three possible ways forward.

    First, domestic control may harden. Given Mojtaba’s reported ties to the security establishment, unrest is more likely to be met with swift repression rather than political accommodation.

    Second, the IRGC could expand its influence in regional affairs, given how closely aligned Mojtaba is with the guards.

    Third, any negotiations with the West would likely be tactical rather than transformative. They would be framed as a strategic necessity rather than an ideological shift.

    And given the fact his father was killed in US-Israeli airstrikes, this will only reinforce a more hardline posture toward both countries.

    In short, Iran under Mojtaba Khamenei would likely remain confrontational in rhetoric, but pragmatic when regime survival is at stake.

  • Iran Announces Khamenei’s Son Mojtaba As Country’s New Supreme Leader

    Iran Announces Khamenei’s Son Mojtaba As Country’s New Supreme Leader

    Iran’s Assembly of Experts announced in a statement on Sunday that Mojtaba Khamenei has been chosen as the country’s new supreme leader, days after Iran International first reported on Tuesday that the Assembly of Experts had selected him under pressure from the Revolutionary Guards.

    “In today’s extraordinary session, the Assembly of Experts, by the decisive vote of its members, selected and introduced Ayatollah Seyed Mojtaba Hosseini Khamenei as the third leader of the sacred system of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” the body said in a statement.

    “In conclusion… (the Assembly) calls on the noble people of Iran, especially the elites and intellectuals of the seminaries and universities, to pledge allegiance to the leadership and preserve unity around the axis of guardianship,” it added.

    Iran’s exiled prince Reza Pahlavi called on Australia to ensure the safety of members of Iran’s women’s national football team, saying they face pressure and threats after refusing to sing the Islamic Republic’s national anthem during the Women’s Asian Cup in Australia.

    “The members of the Iranian Women’s National Football Team are under significant pressure and ongoing threat from the Islamic Republic,” Pahlavi said in a post on X.

    “As a result of their brave act of civil disobedience in refusing to sing the current regime’s national anthem, they face dire consequences should they return to Iran. I call on the Australian government to ensure their safety and give them any and all needed support,” he added.

  • Trump Says Next Iranian Leader Won’t ‘Last Long’ Without US Approval

    Trump Says Next Iranian Leader Won’t ‘Last Long’ Without US Approval

    President Donald Trump said Iran’s next leader would not “last long” without the approval of the United States.

    “He’s going to have to get approval from us,” Trump told ABC News. “If he doesn’t get approval from us he’s not going to last long. We want to make sure that we don’t have to go back every 10 years, when you don’t have a president like me that’s not going to do it.”

    “I don’t want people to have to go back in five years and have to do the same thing again, or worse let them have a nuclear weapon,” he added.

    The US military issued a safety warning to civilians in Iran on Sunday, urging them to stay home and saying Iranian forces were conducting military operations from heavily populated areas.

    “The Iranian regime is using heavily populated civilian areas to conduct military operations, including launching one-way attack drones and ballistic missiles,” US Central Command said in a statement.

    The military said Iranian forces were launching drones and ballistic missiles from crowded areas in cities including Dezful, Esfahan and Shiraz.

    “US forces strongly urge civilians in Iran to remain indoors. The Iranian regime, by using densely populated civilian areas to conduct military operations, including the launch of one-way attack drones and ballistic missiles knowingly endangers the lives of innocent people,” CENTCOM said in another statement posted on its Persian language X page on Sunday.

    The Israeli military said it carried out additional waves of strikes in Tehran on Sunday, targeting facilities linked to Iran’s Revolutionary Guards and security forces.

    “We completed additional waves of attacks in Tehran. The Aerospace Headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and 50 ammunition storage shelters were targeted,” the Israeli military said on its Persian-language X page.

    “In this framework, the aerospace headquarters of the Iranian regime was targeted. This center was used as the site for receiving, distributing and researching by Iran’s Aerospace Organization,” it added.

    The Israeli military said the complex included a control and operations building for the Khayyam satellite, which was launched in August 2022 and was used by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards for surveillance activities.

    It also said it targeted dozens of other sites including an ammunition storage facility at a law enforcement base, a Basij unit base, law enforcement headquarters and a complex belonging to the ground forces of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.

    Oman’s foreign minister condemned the US and Israeli attacks on Iran while also criticizing Iran’s retaliation against neighboring countries and calling for restraint and diplomacy.

    “The action taken by Israel and the US against Iran is both immoral and illegal. But the retaliation by Iran against its neighbors is also deeply regrettable and unacceptable,” Oman’s foreign minister Badr Albusaidi said in a post on X.

    “I call for restraint on all sides, a ceasefire, and an urgent return to diplomacy,” he added.

    Pope Leo XIV voiced concern that the conflict involving Iran could spread across the Middle East and destabilize other countries in the region, including Lebanon.

    “Reports from Iran and across the entire Middle East continue to cause deep dismay and raise the fear that the conflict will expand, and that other countries in the region, including dear Lebanon, may once again sink into instability,” Pope Leo XIV said in a post on X.

    “Let us pray together for the roar of bombs to cease, weapons to fall silent, and space to open for dialogue, in which people’s voices may be heard,” he added.

    The Arab League condemned Iran’s escalation against civilian targets and vital facilities in the Persian Gulf, warning that the attacks could push the region onto a “dangerous trajectory.”

    Secretary-General Ahmed Aboul Gheit said the strikes on civilian targets and critical infrastructure were a grave strategic mistake and a reckless move that threatened regional stability.

    The bloc said Iranian attacks on civilian facilities and infrastructure could widen the conflict and deepen hostility across the region.

    Arab League foreign ministers are due to hold an emergency meeting on Sunday to discuss the escalating tensions.

    Iran International 

  • Iran Chooses New Supreme Leader

    Iran Chooses New Supreme Leader

    Iran’s powerful clerical body responsible for selecting the country’s supreme leader says it has reached a decision on who will succeed the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, though the chosen name has not yet been publicly announced.

    Members of the Assembly of Experts confirmed on Sunday that the vote to appoint Iran’s next supreme leader has already taken place. Ahmad Alamolhoda, a member of the assembly, revealed that the process had concluded and that the secretariat would soon release the name of the selected leader.

    “The vote to appoint the leader has taken place and the leader has been chosen,” Alamolhoda said, according to Iran’s Mehr news agency. He added that the official announcement would come later from the body’s secretariat.

    The Assembly of Experts, composed of senior clerics, holds constitutional authority to appoint and oversee the supreme leader — the highest political and religious authority in Iran, with the final say over all matters of state, including military, political, and judicial decisions.

    Although the official identity of the new leader has not yet been disclosed, speculation is mounting that Mojtaba Khamenei, the son of the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, could assume the role. Mojtaba has long been mentioned as a possible successor to his father, who has ruled Iran as the supreme leader since 1989.

    Mohsen Heydari, another member of the selection body representing Khuzestan province, confirmed that the assembly had reached a consensus.

    “The most suitable candidate, approved by the majority of the Assembly of Experts, has been determined,” Heydari told Iran’s ISNA news agency.

    Heydari also referenced comments from the United States, saying the “Great Satan” had already mentioned the name of the chosen candidate, using Iran’s long-standing political term for Washington.

    U.S. President Donald Trump has insisted he should play a role in determining Iran’s next leader and has dismissed the possibility of Mojtaba Khamenei taking the position, calling him a “lightweight.” Iranian officials, however, have strongly rejected any suggestion that Washington could influence the decision.

    Another assembly member, Mohammad Mehdi Mirbagheri, confirmed that a final decision had been reached. In a video published by Iran’s Fars news agency, he said: “a firm opinion reflecting the majority view has been reached.”

    The leadership transition follows the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on February 28 during U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran — an event that triggered a broader conflict across the Middle East.

    Tensions surrounding the succession have intensified further, with the Israeli military issuing a warning on social media directed at members of the Assembly of Experts. In a post written in Farsi on X, Israel said it would closely monitor the process and warned that it would not hesitate to target those involved in selecting the next leader.

    Despite the threats and the volatile regional environment, Mirbagheri said the clerical body remains determined to complete its task.

    He said that members were proceeding carefully, acknowledging that “the current circumstances are difficult and obstacles remain,” but emphasised that the process of choosing Iran’s next supreme leader would continue with precision.

  • Trump Says US Does Not Need UK’s Aircraft Carriers For Iran War

    Trump Says US Does Not Need UK’s Aircraft Carriers For Iran War

    United States President Donald Trump has posted on social media that he does not need the United Kingdom to deploy aircraft carriers to the Middle East, amid the ongoing war with Iran.

    Saturday’s post on Truth Social follows a statement from the UK’s Ministry of Defence that one of its two flagship aircraft carriers, the HMS Prince of Wales, has been placed on “high readiness”.

    “The United Kingdom, our once Great Ally, maybe the Greatest of them all, is finally giving serious thought to sending two aircraft carriers to the Middle East,” Trump wrote.

    “That’s OK, Prime Minister Starmer, we don’t need them any longer — But we will remember. We don’t need people that join Wars after we’ve already won!”

    The post, with its reference to the UK as a “once great ally”, signals a deepening rift between the two countries that has emerged since Trump returned to office last year.

    The divide appears to have deepened over the past week, as the US and Israel continue to hammer Iran as part of a war they launched on February 28, 2026.

    The conflict has sparked fears across the Middle East, as retaliatory strikes from Tehran target US allies across the region.

    Already, an estimated 1,332 people have been killed in Iran, and the US has confirmed the deaths of six of its service members. More deaths have been reported in countries like Lebanon, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Iraq.

    The UK government has increased its involvement in the war on Iran, widely considered illegal under international law.

    The UK Defence Ministry, for instance, said on Saturday that the government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer had allowed the US to use its military bases for what it termed “limited defensive purposes”.

    The bases include RAF Fairford in Gloucestershire and the Diego Garcia site in the Chagos Islands, located in the Indian Ocean. Initially, there had been reports that Starmer had blocked the US use of the bases.

    In the immediate aftermath of the initial US-Israeli strike, Starmer appeared to blanche at the prospect of joining the war.

    UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. PHOTO/https://www.facebook.com/KeirStarmerLabour

    He and the leaders of France and Germany issued a joint statement, underscoring that any actions they might take would be defensive in nature.

    “We will take steps to defend our interests and those of our allies in the region, potentially through enabling necessary and proportionate defensive action to destroy Iran’s capability to fire missiles and drones at their source,” the joint statement said.

    “We have agreed to work together with the US and allies in the region on this matter.”

    But Starmer has had to push back on domestic criticism both for and against joining the war.

    On Monday, he told the UK Parliament, “We are not joining the US and Israeli offensive strikes”, citing the need to protect “Britain’s national interest” and “British lives”.

    When asked if they supported Starmer’s initial decision not to allow the US to use UK bases, 56 percent of respondents approved. Only 27 percent said it was the wrong choice.

    Thousands of protesters gathered outside the US Embassy in London on Saturday to call for an end to the ballooning conflict.

    The US president, meanwhile, has upped his criticism of Starmer over the past week, further fraying relations with the UK government.

    Al Jazeera.

  • Iran War Leadership Rift Exposed As Guards Keep Striking Arab Neighbors

    Iran War Leadership Rift Exposed As Guards Keep Striking Arab Neighbors

    Iran’s Revolutionary Guards continued launching attacks on neighboring countries despite President Pezeshkian’s apology to regional states and his order for the armed forces to halt such strikes, highlighting tensions over who controls wartime decisions.

    Iran’s Revolutionary Guards started launching attacks against the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, and the Iraqi Kurdistan shortly after President Pezeshkian said in a televised speech he had instructed them to halt such attacks.

    The IRGC strikes followed unusually sharp verbal attacks by hardliners which highlighted the limited influence Pezeshkian exercises within Iran’s power structure despite his membership in the temporary three-member leadership council that is currently exercising powers normally held by the country’s supreme leader in wartime.

    Pezeshkian said on Saturday that Iran’s armed forces had sometimes acted “at their own discretion” during the recent conflict. He added that, following a decision by the “temporary leadership council,” military forces had now been instructed not to attack neighboring countries “unless they intend to attack us from that country.”

    The first institutional response came from the spokesman of Khatam al-Anbiya Central Headquarters, the body that coordinates operational command of Iran’s armed forces, including both the regular army and the IRGC.

    The spokesman declared that any location used to launch attacks against Iran would be considered a legitimate target. “Every point that serves as the origin of aggression against Iran is a legitimate target,” he said, adding that with the continuation of offensive operations, “all military bases and interests” of the US and Israel in the region would remain the “main targets” of IRGC attacks.

    Within hours, the IRGC also announced missile strikes on Dubai Airport and Juffair Base in Bahrain, which hosts the US Navy’s Fifth Fleet headquarters.

    However, judiciary chief Gholam‑Hossein Mohseni‑Ejei, who also serves on the three-member leadership council, responded quickly. He said evidence from Iranian armed forces showed that “the geography of some regional countries has openly and covertly been placed at the disposal of the enemy” and used for attacks on Iran.

    He added that “intense attacks” on such targets would continue and stressed that “this strategy is currently being implemented and the government and other pillars of the system are united on this matter.”

    Factors behind the apology

    Saudi Arabia on Saturday warned Iran that continued attacks on the kingdom and ​its energy sector could push Riyadh to respond in kind, Reuters reported citing four sources familiar with the matter.

    The message was conveyed before Pezeshkian’s televised apology, according to Reuters.

    Another factor behind Pezeshkian’s apology may have been reports of a drone attack Thursday in the Nakhchivan autonomous region of Azerbaijan, which maintains extensive military cooperation with Israel.

    Iran has denied involvement. However, officials in Baku also said they had also foiled several alleged sabotage plots attributed to the IRGC, including a plot targeting the Baku–Tbilisi–Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline.

    Following the incident, Azerbaijan ordered the immediate withdrawal of its diplomats from Tehran and Tabriz, closed its border with Iran, and demanded an apology.

    In a separate incident earlier this week, Iran’s armed forces denied firing a ballistic missile toward Turkish airspace, which Turkish authorities said was intercepted by NATO air and missile defense systems over the eastern Mediterranean.

    Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Ankara had issued “warnings in the clearest terms” to prevent similar incidents from recurring.

    According to analyst Abdolreza Davari, who defended Pezeshkian’s stance, escalating tensions with the United Arab Emirates (UAE) could be very costly to Iran’s external economy which depends heavily on financial and trade channels through the United Arab Emirates.

    The UAE has warned it could move to seize Iranian state-linked assets within its jurisdiction if tensions escalate further, according to regional analysts and officials familiar with the dispute.

    Hardline backlash and possible moves to limit Pezeshkian’s authority

    Some political figures defended Pezeshkian. Davari said the president was simply conveying a decision by the temporary leadership council to halt attacks on neighboring states. He argued that until a new supreme leader is chosen, council decisions carry the authority of the supreme leader and must be implemented.

    Hardline critics, however, reacted harshly to the president’s remarks. Former lawmaker Jalal Rashidi Kouchi wrote on X: “An apology is made when a mistake has occurred, whether intentionally or unintentionally. We made no mistake. Your message showed no sign of authority.”

    The conservative website Raja News described Pezeshkian as “an irritant to a nation ready for the final confrontation with arrogance” and called for preventing him from sending what it called “signals of weakness.”

    The article also warned that Pezeshkian’s description of military strikes as “at their own discretion” could provide justification for neighboring states or international institutions to challenge what it called Iran’s “legitimate and sovereign defense.”

    Hardline member of parliament Hamid Rasaei wrote on X that Pezeshkian’s comments were unacceptable, arguing that countries hosting US bases should be the ones apologizing. “The armed forces know their duty well and, as before, will target with powerful missiles wherever the Iranian nation and homeland are attacked. The firm demand of the Iranian people is exactly this.”

    Several lawmakers, including Hamed Yazdian and Mohammad Mannan Raisi, urged the Assembly of Experts to quickly appoint a new supreme leader, arguing that statements like Pezeshkian’s risk placing Iran in a position of weakness.

    Tehran representative Kamran Ghazanfari also threatened to pursue a parliamentary motion declaring the president politically incompetent — a process that would require signatures from one-third of lawmakers and a two-thirds vote to remove him.

    Iran International

  • Weight-Loss Treatments Boom As Kenyan Attitudes To Beauty Change

    Weight-Loss Treatments Boom As Kenyan Attitudes To Beauty Change

    In Kenya, where being overweight was once perceived as a sign of wealth and success, a drive to shed the pounds is now taking hold.

    Surgical procedures and weight-loss drugs are growing in popularity, with some influencers detailing their own slimming journeys to both acclaim and criticism.

    At her weight-loss clinic in the capital, Dr Lyudmila Shchukina has a fully booked schedule.

    It has not always been this way for the Nairobi Bariatric Center, which she and her late husband – both from Ukraine – founded three decades ago.

    When it started, the facility, which Shchukina proudly regards as a pioneer for weight-loss surgery in the country, was hardly receiving any clients.

    But the clinic is now thriving, seeing 10 to 15 patients a day.

    It’s a “boom”, the doctor tells the BBC one evening at the end of her shift.

    Societal pressures may be one reason for the change.

    Kenyans on social media are not known for holding back and many people, both men and women, have been insultingly told to, in the Kenyan phrase, “unfat!” after pictures of themselves have been posted online.

    When political activist Francis Gaitho complained about being cyber-bullied over his weight, several people responded by telling him to “unfat”.

    Shchukina says that concern over both physical and mental health linked to excess weight drives patients to her doors.

    She sees patients who have high blood pressure, infertility issues, diabetes, joint and back pain, while others are concerned about the overall quality of their life.

    Kenyans are now “discovering that obesity is not a sign of wealth, it’s about health”, Shchukina says.

    Health officials here have become increasingly concerned about the issue. In urban areas just over half of women and a quarter of men were described as either overweight or obese in a 2022 survey. In rural areas the equivalent figures were 39% and 14%.

    However, some of Shchukina’s patients are also seeking to enhance their appearance, besides their health concerns.

    She says that at one time being a “big size” was considered fashionable but “now… the fashion is [to be] slim, tiny… You can see how it is changing.”

    Beauty expert Yvonne Kanyi says that for women the “pressure” for the “hourglass [figure] and flat stomach” was always there, although access to medical procedures was not.

    Kanyi, who runs a skincare and cosmetics business and frequently speaks about beauty and entrepreneurship, says that what has changed is the celebrity culture which has now amplified the trend, “normalising medical intervention as part of maintaining a certain image”.

    Besides that, more women are now feeling empowered to make decisions about their body “without apology”, she tells the BBC.

    One of those is Naomi Kuria, a popular content creator who has had medical procedures to lose weight and enhance her looks – and is proud of the outcome.

    The 27-year-old’s efforts to lose excess weight began in 2024.

    She started with gym workouts, but five months later, she realised she was not achieving the results she wanted. She had instead added more weight and was having “serious pain” in her knees.

    Alternatives were suggested, including swimming or dieting. But she wanted speedier results.

    “How long will I swim to lose a kg really?” she asks. “So I explored other quicker ways to lose weight and then I found out about Ozempic.” A fellow content creator talked to her about it and she sought medical advice.

    Ozempic is one of several brands, including Mounjaro and Wegovy, that are now being prescribed for long-term weight management.

    It contains semaglutide, which is used in the treatment of diabetes.

    The medication, administered as an injection, targets hormones that determine how quickly the stomach empties and how full a person feels, helping to regulate appetite.

    Kuria says the jab helped her get closer to her ideal weight, losing 11kg (1st 10lb) in about a month and a half.

    In Kenya, Ozempic is officially only available on prescription. She says she spent 80,000 Kenyan shillings ($620; £465) on the drug.

    Despite experiencing the side-effect of “throwing up like crazy”, she felt good afterwards “because every part of my body was really defined”.

    However, Kuria wanted to go a step further and underwent a procedure, known as an airsculpt, which is a type of liposuction designed to shape the body. This involved removing fat from her stomach and transferring it to her “skinny” legs.

    She has faced criticism from her audience for undergoing the procedure, which she feels stems from people “misjudging” her reasons.

    Commenters asked her why she went through with it, saying that she already had the “perfect body”.

    Naomi Kuria.

    Others questioned why she had spent a total of 700,000 Kenyan shillings ($5,400; £4,000) to change her appearance.

    “So you have decided to compete with God,” said one person.

    But Kuria says these were her own “personal choices,” and she is happy with them, even if the barrage of “crazy reactions” did affect her at the beginning.

    “I’m trending and everyone is talking about me and not even one person is making a positive comment.

    “I got to a place where I was very angry, very angry with people. And I started replying to comments, and if you’re rude to me, I get rude to you,” she tells the BBC.

    Ciru Muriuki, a 43-year-old content creator and journalist also shared her weight-loss experience.

    To reduce her own weight, Muriuki first underwent a gastric balloon procedure, in which a silicone balloon is put in the stomach, to limit its capacity and create a feeling of fullness. The balloon is usually removed after six months.

    Despite the procedure, her health “was all over the place” in early 2024 following the death of her fiancé.

    She said she quickly lost a lot of weight “that wasn’t in a healthy way”, and then it started rising again.

    It was then that she sought weight-loss jabs from a medical professional.

    She said this was not about looking for a “series of shortcuts” to get what she wanted.

    “It was never like that,” she said, fully aware of the criticism that is often directed at people who are seen as finding a quick way to lose weight.

    Diet control and exercise have long been recommended as the best ways to manage weight.

    Patients administer the weight-loss jabs themselves. Getty images

    But Dr Alvin Mondoh, a Kenyan weight-management specialist, says “people still do need help” through medical intervention, as weight gain can be caused “by factors beyond your control”.

    Yet he warns that there is a growing concern about the use of weight-loss jabs.

    “Unfortunately, what we’ve seen in the recent past is a growing trend of people using it for vanity reasons,” he says.

    There are risks, especially if someone tries to avoid the certified clinics and licensed medication and gets something cheaper in an unregulated market.

    At the Nairobi Bariatric Center, which offers surgery, weight-loss drugs and counselling, packages can cost up to $7,000 (£5,000), a sum far beyond the reach of most Kenyans.

    Kuria acknowledges that weight-loss procedures are “very costly” – she has spent about $6,000 on both the drugs and the airsculpt.

    And she warns people to be aware of the consequences.

    “You will [also] pay the cost of recovery, which is not easy. You will pay the cost of stigma, society stigma. It’s a shortcut that is never short,” she says.

    However, she has no regrets.

    Mondoh warns that some people’s desperation to lose weight can be exploited by scammers.

    Last August, the drugs regulator, the Pharmacy and Poisons Board, issued a public safety alert over the use of weight-loss medicines.

    “Semaglutide is a prescription-only medicine and its unsupervised or off-label use may result in serious health concerns,” it said.

    One fitness influencer was warned to stop promoting places where his followers could buy the jabs at a cheaper price.

    But given the rise in obesity levels in Kenya, the demand for quick ways to lose weight will not go away.

    BBC

  • US Considering Use Of Special Forces To Seize Iran’s Enriched Uranium – Axios

    US Considering Use Of Special Forces To Seize Iran’s Enriched Uranium – Axios

    The United States and Israel have discussed sending special forces into Iran to seize its highly enriched uranium stockpiles at a later stage of the war, Axios reported citing four sources with knowledge of the discussions.

    The Trump administration has discussed two options: removing the entire material from Iran or bringing in nuclear experts to dilute it on-site, the report said citing a US official.

    Speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One, Trump did not rule out the use of ground forces against Iran but said that would happen only “for a very good reason.”

    Asked if the ground forces would be deployed to secure nuclear material, Trump said, “At some point maybe we will. We haven’t gone after it. We wouldn’t do it now. Maybe we will do it later.”

    There has also been discussion of seizing Iran’s Kharg Island in the Persian Gulf which is responsible for almost 90% of Iran’s crude oil exports, Axios reported citing Trump administration officials.

    US intelligence agencies have concluded that Iran, or potentially another group, could retrieve highly enriched uranium buried beneath the nuclear site in Isfahan following US strikes last year, The New York Times reported, citing officials familiar with classified assessments.

    According to the report, the uranium stockpile was buried under rubble after American attacks on the facility, but intelligence officials believe it may still be reachable.

    The New York Times wrote that the Iranian government can currently reach the material through a very narrow access point, though it remains unclear how quickly the uranium could be moved.

    The uranium is stored in gas form and kept inside specialized canisters, the report said.

    US officials said American intelligence agencies are closely monitoring the Isfahan nuclear site and maintain continuous surveillance of the area.

    They said the United States has a high level of confidence it would be able to detect — and respond to — any attempt by Iran or other actors to remove the uranium from the facility.

    White House Special Envoy Steve Witkoff said there may still be room for a diplomatic deal with what remains of Iran’s government but stressed that Washington is “not looking to settle”.

    He said Iranian officials took a hard line in previous talks, insisting they had an “inalienable right to enrich” uranium.

    “They bragged about having, 60% enriched fuel, enough for eleven bombs. They told me and Jared [Kushner], ‘We’re not gonna give you diplomatically what you couldn’t take militarily’,” Witkoff told reporters as he stood next to President Donald Trump aboard Air Force One.

    “I think they’re gonna need a change of attitude… we have a lot of negotiating leverage, maybe maximum, but we’re not looking to settle. They’d like to settle. We’re not looking to settle.”

    A residential building in the holy city of Qom was attacked by US-Israeli airstrikes early Sunday, deputy governor general of Qom province, home to the world’s biggest Shia seminary, told state media.

    Hours earlier, photos and videos circulating on social media showed a similar attack on a residential building in Shahr-e Rey, southern Tehran, in what seems to be another attempt at targeted killing.

    The Israeli military said on Saturday it struck several fuel storage complexes in Tehran which it said were used by Iran’s military forces.

    The IDF said Iran’s military makes “direct and frequent use of these fuel tanks to operate military infrastructure.”

    Through them, it said, the Islamic Republic distributes fuel to various consumers, including military entities in Iran.

    Saudi Arabia has warned Iran that continued attacks on the kingdom and ​its energy sector could push Riyadh to respond in kind, Reuters reported on Saturday citing four sources familiar with the matter.

    The message was conveyed before Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s televised speech in which he apologized to Arab neighbors for the Iranian attacks, saying he had instructed the country’s armed forces to stop hitting regional countres.

    However, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain as well as the Iraqi Kurdistan were attacked shortly after Pezeshkian’s speech.

  • EXPLAINER – Where Does Europe Stand On US-Israeli Strikes Against Iran?

    EXPLAINER – Where Does Europe Stand On US-Israeli Strikes Against Iran?

    European governments remain divided over the ongoing US-Israeli attacks against Iran, highlighting growing fractures within the Western alliance as Washington presses its European partners to support the military campaign.

    The European Union, key member states, and the United Kingdom have all called for respect for international law and urged de-escalation. However, they have failed to present a unified strategy, appearing increasingly sidelined as the crisis in the Middle East deepens and threatens global repercussions.

    On Wednesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said US President Donald Trump expects “all of our European allies” to back the US and Israel.

    Trump has openly criticized the hesitation among European governments. He also took aim at British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after London declined to support the strikes.

    “This is not Winston Churchill that we’re dealing with,” Trump said, referring to Starmer’s stance that the UK does not support “regime change from the skies.”

    EU calls for diplomacy

    The European Union has urged restraint and intensified diplomatic efforts to prevent further escalation in the Middle East, warning that a prolonged war could have serious global consequences.

    EU foreign ministers held an emergency video conference following the outbreak of hostilities to assess the situation in Iran and the wider region. In a joint statement, the bloc expressed “utmost concern” over the unfolding events and called for maximum restraint from all parties.

    Reiterating the bloc’s long-standing policy, the European Commission spokesperson said the EU will continue to support a diplomatic solution aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.

    At the same time, the bloc stressed the importance of protecting civilians and respecting international law, including the UN Charter and international humanitarian law.

    In one of her latest speeches, EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas warned that the escalating crisis reflects a broader erosion of international law.

    “Without restoring international law and accountability, we are doomed to see repeated violations of the law, disruption, and chaos,” she said.

    UK pursues balanced stance

    The UK has adopted a cautious approach, combining criticism of Iran with calls for diplomacy.

    Starmer defended the decision not to participate in the strikes, saying the best solution is “a negotiated settlement with Iran, where they give up their nuclear ambitions.”

    While Britain initially restricted the US from using the Diego Garcia military base in the Chagos Islands, London later confirmed that American forces could use British facilities to support regional defense and Israel’s security.

    The UK has also increased its defensive military presence in the region, deploying additional Typhoon fighter jets to Qatar.

    France stresses international law

    France has taken a more legally focused position.

    Macron warned that military action conducted outside international law could undermine global stability and called for emergency discussions at the UN Security Council.

    At the same time, Paris has sought to avoid direct confrontation with Washington and has condemned Iran’s retaliatory attacks.

    France has authorized a temporary presence of American aircraft at certain bases but secured guarantees that the planes would not be used to carry out strikes on Iran and would only support regional defense operations.

    Paris has also deployed the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle and other military assets to the region to protect French interests, including its base in Abu Dhabi.

    Similarly, Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten said that he recognizes the threat Tehran poses to regional security; however, he believes the US and Israeli strikes on Iran are not consistent with international law.

    Germany more sympathetic to US goals

    Germany’s stance has been more aligned with Washington’s broader objectives.

    Chancellor Friedrich Merz described Iran as a major security threat and said decades of sanctions and diplomacy have failed to halt Tehran’s destabilizing activities.

    During a visit to the White House this week, Trump praised Merz as “an excellent leader,” highlighting Berlin’s decision to allow US forces to use the Ramstein Air Base in Germany.

    Merz said Western governments share an interest in preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, but also warned about the risks of a prolonged conflict.

    “An endless war is not in our interest,” he said, adding that a collapse of the Iranian state could have far-reaching consequences for Europe, including risks to energy supply, security and migration.

    Germany is working with European and regional partners to develop a framework for ending the conflict and establishing a broader Middle East peace order, he added.

    Spain voices stronger criticism

    Spain has taken one of the strongest positions in Europe against the US-Israel military campaign.

    Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez described the attacks on Iran as “an extraordinary mistake” and warned that the conflict poses a serious threat to global stability.

    Madrid has also refused to allow US forces to use Spanish air and naval bases to carry out attacks on Iran, a decision that has drawn sharp criticism from Trump, who threatened to cut off trade ties with Spain.

    Sanchez defended the decision, saying alliances should allow partners to disagree.

    “We are not going to take a position that goes against our values and principles out of fear of reprisals from others… We say no to war,” he said.

    Italy raises legal concerns

    Defense Minister Guido Crosetto told parliament that the military operation carried out by the United States and Israel was “outside the rules of international law,” warning that the situation in the region could further deteriorate.

    Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani stressed that Rome is not at war and urged diplomatic efforts to prevent a broader regional conflict.

    “Italy is not at war; diplomatic channels should be preferred,” Tajani said, warning of a “real risk” that the crisis could expand across the Middle East.

    Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has also warned that the conflict could have “totally unpredictable consequences.”

    She said any potential request from Washington to use Italian military bases would be carefully assessed by the government in consultation with parliament.

    Eastern Europe backs Washington

    In contrast, several Eastern European countries have offered clearer political support for the US-led operation.

    Polish President Karol Nawrocki has framed the conflict primarily through a security lens, arguing that Iran’s actions threaten international stability.

    At the same time, Poland has emphasized that it is not directly involved in the military campaign. Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said Warsaw has not received any request to participate in US operations against Iran.

    Similar supportive voices have emerged from the Czech Republic.

    Iran’s nuclear program seriously threatens international security, and a US strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities is thus an understandable effort to prevent the development of nuclear weapons, Prime Minister Petr Fiala said.

    He expressed optimism that US attacks would prompt the Iranian government to engage in talks, leading to de‑escalation in the region.

  • Withheld Epstein Files With Accusations Against Trump Released By Justice Department

    Withheld Epstein Files With Accusations Against Trump Released By Justice Department

    FBI documents summarising interviews with a woman who made unsubstantiated claims of sexual assault against Donald Trump have been released as part of the US Department of Justice’s (DOJ) trove of Epstein files.

    The release follows reports that the documents were missing from the DOJ’s database, prompting Democrats to accuse officials of a cover-up.

    The DOJ said it mistakenly withheld the files during its review process because they had been “incorrectly coded as duplicative”.

    The memos describe a series of interviews in 2019 with the woman, who makes uncorroborated claims against Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. The president has consistently denied wrongdoing in relation to the late sex offender.

    According to one of the three memos, the unnamed woman told FBI agents during an interview that she was introduced to Trump by Epstein in the 1980s when she was a teenager. The woman accused both men of sexually assaulting her when she was between 13 and 15 years old.

    The FBI agents did not have further contact with the woman after the interviews, according to the files.

    It is unclear whether Trump and Epstein knew each other during the time period that the woman alleges the incidents took place.

    In a statement responding to the newly published allegations, the White House said they were “completely baseless” and “backed by zero credible evidence”.

    “As we have said countless times, President Trump has been totally exonerated by the release of the Epstein Files,” Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said.

    She added that the Justice Department under the previous Joe Biden administration had not brought charges against Trump based on the accusations “because they knew President Trump did absolutely nothing wrong”.

    Trump is mentioned thousands of times in the files released by the justice department, including in emails and correspondence sent by Jeffrey Epstein himself to others.

    Trump has not been accused of any crimes by the Epstein survivors who have come forward so far.

    As well as summaries of FBI witness interviews, including those with the unnamed woman in 2019, the full batch of Epstein files also contains a list of allegations made against Trump by callers to its national Threat Operation Center tip line.

    The list includes numerous allegations of sexual abuse made against Trump, Epstein and other high-profile figures. Many of these appear to be based on unverified tips and often no supporting evidence is included.

    After a January release of Epstein files, the justice department said: “Some of the documents contain untrue and sensationalist claims against President Trump that were submitted to the FBI right before the 2020 election.

    “To be clear, the claims are unfounded and false, and if they have a shred of credibility, they certainly would have been weaponized against President Trump already.”

    The three newly published memos follow reports in US media that they had been wrongly withheld in the initial Epstein file releases.

    NPR first reported that indexes and serial numbers in the files suggested the FBI had conducted four interviews with the woman in 2019 as part of its investigation into Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who was jailed in 2022 for sex trafficking.

    But three of the interview summaries and related notes, totalling more than 50 pages, were not available on the justice department’s website, according to reports by NPR and others including the New York Times.

    Epstein appears to have been friends with Trump for a number of years. They later fell out – which happened in the early 2000s, according to Trump, two years before Epstein was first arrested.

    Earlier this week, a House committee voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi to answer questions about the justice department’s handling of the Epstein files.

    Republicans on the House Oversight committee joined Democrats to vote to subpoena her.

    Last November, Congress passed a law compelling the department to release all material from its investigations into Epstein. Millions of documents have since been released.

    BBC