Category: World

  • Adani Group Reacts To US Bribery Charges, Vows Legal Action

    Adani Group Reacts To US Bribery Charges, Vows Legal Action

    The Adani Group on Thursday strongly refuted bribery allegations made by the against directors of the Adani Green as baseless.

    The Adani Group spokesperson in an official statement said all legal recourse will be taken.
    “The US Department of Justice and the US Securities and Exchange Commission against directors of Adani Green are baseless and denied,” the statement read.
    The group further highlighted a key aspect of the legal proceedings, noting, “As stated by the US Department of Justice itself, ‘the charges in the indictment are allegations and the defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.’ All possible legal recourse will be sought.”

    The Adani Group also reaffirmed its dedication to high standards of governance, compliance, and transparency across its operations.

    “The Adani Group has always upheld and is steadfastly committed to maintaining the highest standards of governance, transparency and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions of its operations. We assure our stakeholders, partners and employees that we are a law-abiding organisation, fully compliant with all laws,” the statement added.

    Amid these allegations, Adani Green Energy also informed stock exchanges that its subsidiaries have decided to defer their planned US dollar-denominated bond offerings.

    It said “In light of these developments, our subsidiaries have presently decided not to proceed with the proposed USD denominated bond offerings”.
    US prosecutors had charged Gautam Adani and others in an alleged Solar Energy contract bribery case. A five-count criminal indictment has been unsealed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, charging prominent Indian executives including Chairman of the Adani Group Gautam Adani by linking them to an alleged bribery and fraud scheme.

    According to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Eastern District of New York, “A five-count criminal indictment was unsealed in federal court charging Gautam Adani, Sagar R. Adani, and Vneet S. Jaain, with conspiracies to commit securities and wire fraud and substantive securities fraud for their roles in a multi-billion-dollar scheme to obtain funds from U.S. investors and global financial institutions on the basis of false and misleading statements.”

    The indictment also charges Ranjit Gupta and Rupesh Agarwal, former executives of a renewable-energy company with securities that had traded on the New York Stock Exchange (the U.S. Issuer), and Cyril Cabanes, Saurabh Agarwal and Deepak Malhotra, former employees of a Canadian institutional investor, with conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act in connection with the alleged bribery scheme.

  • Billionaire Gautam Adani Of India’s Adani Group Charged In US With Bribery, Fraud

    Billionaire Gautam Adani Of India’s Adani Group Charged In US With Bribery, Fraud

    Gautam Adani, the billionaire chair of Indian conglomerate Adani Group and one of the world’s richest people, has been indicted in New York over his role in an alleged multibillion-dollar bribery and fraud scheme, U.S. prosecutors said on Wednesday.

    Authorities said Adani and seven other defendants, including his nephew Sagar Adani, agreed to pay about $265 million in bribes to Indian government officials to obtain solar energy supply contracts expected to yield $2 billion of profit over 20 years.

    According to an indictment, some conspirators referred privately to Gautam Adami with the code names “Numero uno” and “the big man,” while Sagar Adani allegedly used his cellphone to track specifics about the bribes.

    Prosecutors also said the Adanis and another executive at Adani Green Energy, Vneet Jaain, raised more than $3 billion in loans and bonds for that company by concealing the corruption from lenders and investors.

    The case involves alleged violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, a U.S. anti-bribery law.

    India’s embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Lawyers for the defendants could not immediately be identified.

    Gautam Adani, 62, is worth $69.8 billion according to Forbes magazine, making him the world’s 22nd richest person and India’s second-richest person behind Reliance Industries Chair Mukesh Ambani.

    Among the other defendants are Ranjit Gupta and Rupesh Agarwal, respectively a former chief executive and former chief strategy and commercial officer of Azure Power Global, and Cyril Cabanes, a director there.

    The other defendants, as well as Cabanes, also worked for a Canadian institutional investor, prosecutors said.

    Seven of the defendants are Indian citizens who lived in India during the relevant period, while Cabanes is a dual French-Australian citizen who lived in Singapore, prosecutors said.

    According to court records, a judge has issued arrest warrants for Gautam Adani and Sagar Adani, and prosecutors plan to hand those warrants to foreign law enforcement.

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed related civil charges against Gautam Adani, Sagar Adani and Cabanes.

    Last week, Gautam Adani said in a post on social media platform X that his conglomerate planned to invest $10 billion in U.S. energy security and infrastructure projects, creating a potential 15,000 jobs, without providing a timetable.

    Adani announced the investment while also congratulating U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on his election win.

    Trump has pledged to make it easier for energy companies to drill on federal land and build new pipelines.

    In January 2023, the U.S.-based short-seller Hindenburg Research accused Adani Group of using offshore tax havens improperly, a charge the company denied. The report sparked an approximately $150 billion meltdown in Adani Group stocks.

    The charges were announced hours after Adani on Wednesday raised $600 million from a sale of 20-year “green” bonds.

  • Biden Agrees To Give Ukraine Anti-Personnel Mines

    Biden Agrees To Give Ukraine Anti-Personnel Mines

    BBC—US President Joe Biden has agreed to give Ukraine anti-personnel land mines, a US defence official told the BBC.

    The official, who was speaking on condition of anonymity, said such mines would be delivered soon and Washington expected that they would be used on Ukraine’s territory.

    Kyiv was also committed to not using such mines in densely-populated areas, the official said.

    The move is seen as an attempt to slow Russian troops who have been steadily advancing in Ukraine’s east in recent months.

    The provision of anti-personnel land mines is the latest move by the outgoing US administration to bolster Ukraine’s war effort before Donald Trump returns to the White House on 20 January.

    Russia has deployed landmines liberally since the start of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 but international objections to the use of such weapons on the grounds that they pose a risk to civilians had prevented the Biden administration from signing off on them.

    The US defence official confirmed to the BBC that Ukraine had pledged to use only mines that remained active for a limited period of time.

    Earlier, it was confirmed that US-made longer-range Army Tactical Missile System (Atacms) missiles had struck targets inside Russia only days after reports emerged that the White House had granted permission for their use.

    Russia’s defence ministry said the strike had targeted the Bryansk region bordering Ukraine to the north on Tuesday morning.

    It said five missiles had been shot down and one had caused damage – with its fragments starting a fire at a military facility.

    But two US officials said initial indications suggested Russia had intercepted just two missiles out of around eight fired by Ukraine.

    The BBC has not been able to verify independently the contradicting figures.

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov accused Washington of trying to escalate the conflict.

    The Kremlin has vowed to retaliate.

    On Tuesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin approved changes to Russia’s nuclear doctrine, setting out new conditions under which the country would consider using its arsenal.

    It now says an attack from a non-nuclear state, if backed by a nuclear power, will be treated as a joint assault on Russia.

    Commenting on the changes, US state department spokesperson Matthew Miller said: “Since the beginning of its war of aggression against Ukraine, [Russia] has sought to coerce and intimidate both Ukraine and other countries around the world through irresponsible nuclear rhetoric and behaviour.”

  • Bitcoin Breaks $81,000 As Trump’s Election Turbocharges Cryptocurrencies

    Bitcoin Breaks $81,000 As Trump’s Election Turbocharges Cryptocurrencies

    Bitcoin soared to a record high above $81,000 on Monday on expectations that cryptocurrencies will boom in a favourable regulatory environment following the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president and pro-crypto candidates to Congress.

    The world’s biggest and best-known cryptocurrency , has now more than doubled from the year’s low of $38,505 and was last at $81,572 having earlier touched a record high of $81,899.

    Trump embraced digital assets during his campaign, promising to make the United States the “crypto capital of the planet” and to accumulate a national stockpile of bitcoin.

    Other so-called ‘Trump trades’ – from U.S. stocks to shorting bonds have lost some steam since the election, but cryptocurrencies haven’t paused for breath.

    “Bitcoin’s Trump-pump is alive and well… with Republicans on the cusp of taking the house to confirm a red wave in Congress, it seems the crypto crowd are betting on digital-currency deregulation,” said Matt Simpson, senior market analyst at City Index, referring to Republican control of both houses.

    While Simpson warned Trump’s near-term priorities are likely to lie elsewhere, crypto investors see an end to stepped-up scrutiny under U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler whom Trump has said he will fire.

    In Ohio, one of the crypto industry’s biggest foes in Congress – Senate Banking Committee Chair Sherrod Brown was ousted, while pro-crypto candidates from both the Democratic and Republican parties won in Michigan, West Virgina, Indiana, Alabama and North Carolina.

    Trump also unveiled a new crypto business, World Liberty Financial in September, and although details about the business have been scarce, investors have taken his personal interest in the sector as a friendly signal.

    Billionaire Elon Musk, a major Trump ally, is also a proponent of cryptocurrencies.

    Eric Trump, one of the president-elect’s sons and executive vice president of his private conglomerate, The Trump Organization, is a keynote speaker at a bitcoin conference in Abu Dhabi next month, according to the event organisers.

    Gains in cryptocurrencies have been broad. Ether rose above $3,200 for the first time in over three months on Monday and was last fetching $3,192. Dogecoin , an alternative cryptocurrency that began as a satirical critique of the 2013 crypto frenzy, was at a three-year high.

  • Haiti To Replace Prime Minister As Security Crisis Mounts

    Haiti To Replace Prime Minister As Security Crisis Mounts

    PORT-AU-PRINCE – Haiti will name entrepreneur and former senate candidate Alix Didier Fils-Aime to replace Prime Minister Garry Conille, who was tapped for the role in May, according to a transitional presidential council draft resolution seen by Reuters.

    The shakeup is the latest blow to political stability in the country, which has been wracked with worsening violence. Armed gangs have gained control of most of capital Port-au-Prince and expanded to nearby regions, fueling hunger and forcing hundreds of thousands from their homes.

    Promised international support still lags and nearby nations have deported Haitian migrants back to the country.

    The resolution, dated Monday, Nov. 11, is expected to be published in the official gazette.

    Didier Fils-Aime is the son of well-known Haitian activist, Alix Fils-Aime, who was jailed under the regime of dictator Jean-Claude “Baby Doc” Duvalier.

    Conille, who also briefly led the country over a decade ago, has been prime minister for about six months. He was appointed to the role in Mayby Haiti’s transition council to return to the role as the Caribbean nation works to restore stability.
    The transition council, named in April, was tasked with choosing a prime minister and wielding certain presidential powers until conditions are considered secure enough for a new election. There has been some infighting among its councillors.
    In recent weeks, Conille embarked on trips abroad to the United Arab Emirates and Kenya to seek security assistance in the aftermath of a deadly gang attack that killed at least 70 people.

    In a letter circulating Sunday on social media, Conille said the transition council only had power to appoint a prime minister, but not dismiss one from the role.

    “This resolution, taken outside any legal and constitutional framework, raises serious concerns about its legitimacy and its impact on the future of our country,” the letter said.

  • Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Seeks Bail, Citing Changed Circumstances And New Evidence

    Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs Seeks Bail, Citing Changed Circumstances And New Evidence

    (AP) — Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs filed a new request for bail on Friday, saying changed circumstances, along with new evidence, mean the hip-hop mogul should be allowed to prepare for a May trial from outside jail.

    Lawyers for Combs filed the request in Manhattan federal court, where his previous requests for bail have been rejected by two judges since his September arrest on racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking charges.

    He has pleaded not guilty to charges that he coerced and abused women for years with help from a network of associates and employees, while silencing victims through blackmail and violence, including kidnapping, arson and physical beatings.

    He has been awaiting a May 5 trial at a federal detention facility in Brooklyn.

    In their new court filing, lawyers for Combs say they are proposing a “far more robust” bail package that would subject the entertainer to strict around-the-clock security monitoring and near-total restrictions on his ability to contact anyone but his lawyers. But the amount of money they attach to the package remains $50 million, as they proposed before.

    They also cite new evidence that they say “makes clear that the government’s case is thin.” That evidence, the lawyers said, refutes the government’s claim that a March 2016 video showing Combs physically assaulting his then-girlfriend occurred during a coerced “freak off,” a sexually driven event described in the indictment against Combs.

    They wrote that the encounter was instead “a minutes-long glimpse into a complex but decade-long consensual relationship” between Combs and his then-girlfriend.

    The lawyers argued that the jail conditions Combs is experiencing at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn violate his constitutional rights to participate in his defense.

  • Qatar Agrees To Kick Hamas Out Of Doha Following US Request

    Qatar Agrees To Kick Hamas Out Of Doha Following US Request

    CNN — Qatar agreed in recent weeks to kick Hamas out of its country following a request from the US to do so, capping off months of failed attempts to try to get the militant group – whose top leaders reside in the Qatari capital of Doha – to accept a ceasefire and hostage release deal in the Israel-Hamas war, US and Qatari sources told CNN.

    With efforts to pause the war – which has been a top priority for President Joe Biden – firmly stalled, US officials informed their Qatari counterparts about two weeks ago that they must stop giving Hamas refuge in their capital; Qatar agreed and gave Hamas notice about a week ago, sources said.

    “Hamas is a terrorist group that has killed Americans and continues to hold Americans hostage,” a senior administration official told CNN. “After rejecting repeated proposals to release hostages, its leaders should no longer be welcome in the capitals of any American partner.”

    Throughout the course of the war and negotiations to bring the hostages home, US officials have asked Qatar to use the threat of expulsion as leverage in their talks with Hamas. The final impetus for Qatar agreeing to kick Hamas out came recently after the death of American-Israeli hostage Hersh Goldberg-Polin and Hamas’ rejection of yet another ceasefire proposal.

    Qatar has been a major player in efforts over the past year to try to secure a ceasefire in the Israel-Hamas war, in no small part because senior members of the militant group are based in Doha. Major negotiations have taken place in the Qatari capital for that reason.

    Exactly when Hamas operatives would be exiled out of Qatar – and where they would go – are unclear. One US official told CNN the group has not been given an extended amount of time to leave the country. While Turkey is seen as a possible option, the US is not likely to approve of that scenario for the same reasons that it does not want Qatar to give refuge to Hamas leadership.

    Earlier this year, the Justice Department charged several senior Hamas leaders over the October 7 terrorist attack on Israel. At least one of those defendants, Khaled Meshaal, is believed to be residing in Qatar.

    US Secretary of State Antony Blinken also told Qatar over the summer to warn Hamas that if the group did not agree to halt the war in Gaza, they would risk getting kicked out of Doha.

  • ICC Ruling Body To Conduct Investigation Into Alleged Misconduct By Karim Khan

    ICC Ruling Body To Conduct Investigation Into Alleged Misconduct By Karim Khan

    (Reuters) – The International Criminal Court’s governing body will launch an external investigation into its chief prosecutor Karim Khan over alleged sexual misconduct, two sources familiar with the matter said on Friday.

    Khan is called on in an internal document circulated to member states to temporarily step down from his role at the world’s permanent war crimes court, based in The Hague, while an inquiry is ongoing.

    The undated and unsigned document, seen by Reuters, was circulated to member states by ICC staff.

    Khan’s office referred questions to his attorney and phone calls and repeated requests for comment sent to his lawyers went unanswered.

    Khan has denied allegations of misconduct that were reported to the court’s governing body last month. At that time he asked the court’s own internal oversight body to investigate them.

    A source with knowledge of the matter said an external probe was agreed at a meeting on Thursday of a core group of the court’s governing body, the Assembly of States Parties.

    Reuters couldn’t determine who would conduct the investigation.

    ICC judges are currently reviewing a request Khan made in May for arrest warrants against Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his defence chief and Hamas leaders. Khan has said the misconduct allegations coincided with a campaign of misinformation against his office.

    The internal document, circulated for discussion, argued that the court’s independent, internal body for assessing matters of conduct should have launched a formal inquiry into the allegations when they were first reported.

    A source familiar with the matter said the alleged victim in the Khan case does not have confidence in the independence of the court’s internal body, whose incoming head is a former member of Khan’s staff, because details of reports to it about the alleged misconduct were leaked.

    The current and future head of the independent body did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    The document also shows pressure is mounting on Khan to temporarily step aside and let one of his deputy prosecutors take over while the investigation takes place.

    “The prosecutor should step aside with immediate effect to pave the way for an independent investigation,” the document says. It was unclear if the court’s governing body has asked Khan to do so.

    The ICC is a permanent court that can prosecute individuals for war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide and the crime of aggression in member states or by their nationals. It’s governing body holds its annual meeting early next month.

  • Putin Hails ‘courageous’ Trump After Election Win

    Putin Hails ‘courageous’ Trump After Election Win

    • Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he had a “very warm” and “productive conversation” with the president-elect.
    • US Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigated allegations of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia in 2016, but said in a report three years later that had found no evidence of conspiracy.

    Vladimir Putin has congratulated Donald Trump on his election victory, calling him a “courageous man”.

    Speaking at an event in the Russian city of Sochi, the Russian president said that Trump was “hounded from all sides” during his first term in the White House.

    Putin also said that Trump’s claim that he can help end the war in Ukraine “deserves attention at least”.

    During his campaign, Donald Trump repeatedly said he could end the war “in a day” but has never elaborated on how that could happen.

    During Putin’s address, which lasted several hours and covered a wide range of topics, he also spoke of the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in July, saying it “made an impression” on him.

    After being shot, Trump punched his fist into the air and mouthed the words “fight, fight, fight”, before being hauled away by Secret Service agents.

    “He behaved, in my opinion, in a very correct way, courageously, like a man,” Putin said.

    Asked if he was ready to have discussions with Donald Trump, Putin replied: “We’re ready, we’re ready.”

    Trump had already said on Thursday that he was prepared to speak with Putin, telling NBC News: “I think we’ll speak”.

    The Kremlin was widely accused of interfering in the 2016 presidential election to boost Donald Trump’s campaign against Hilary Clinton, claims rejected by Moscow.

    US Special Counsel Robert Mueller investigated allegations of collusion between Trump’s campaign and Russia in 2016, but said in a report three years later that had found no evidence of conspiracy.

    Elsewhere on Thursday, leaders gathering for the European Political Community in Budapest discussed Trump’s return to the White House.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he had a “very warm” and “productive conversation” with the president-elect.

    “But we have to do everything to ensure that the results of our interaction between Ukraine and America, the whole of Europe and America, are productive and positive,” he added.

    Many in Ukraine and Europe are worried that Trump might slow, if not halt, the flow of American military aid to Kyiv upon taking power in January.

    UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer assured Zelensky at the summit that the UK’s support for Ukraine in its war with Russia remains “iron-clad”.

    Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban – who previously said he celebrated Trump’s win by “tapping into the vodka supply happily” – said the US and Europe now face tough talks on trade.

    Orban, who is a close ally of Trump, told a press conference that “the trade issue with the US will come up and it will not be easy”.

    Before winning the election, Trump said he would impose tariffs of 10% on all imports.

    “There was an agreement that Europe should assume greater responsibility for its own peace and security in the future. To put it even more bluntly, we cannot expect Americans to be the only ones to take care of us,” Orban said.

  • Israel Sends Rescue Planes After Clashes In Amsterdam

    Israel Sends Rescue Planes After Clashes In Amsterdam

    (BBC)- Dutch police have arrested 57 people in the centre of Amsterdam after clashes broke out, reportedly involving young locals and Israeli football supporters.

    Prime Minister Dick Schoof condemned “antisemitic attacks” and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said two “rescue planes” were being sent to Amsterdam after what Israel’s military described as “severe and violent incidents against Israelis”.

    A police spokeswoman told Dutch media that unrest had broken out around Dam Square in the heart of the capital, but did not say who was involved.

    Supporters of Israeli club Maccabi Tel Aviv had travelled to Amsterdam for a Europa Cup match against Ajax.

    Schoof said he had followed developments with horror, adding that he had spoken to Netanyahu and emphasising that the “perpetrators will be tracked down and prosecuted”.

    There had already been arrests and trouble in Dam Square ahead of the match involving Maccabi fans and pro-Palestinian protesters, and there were reports of supporters setting off fireworks and tearing down a Palestinian flag on a nearby street.

    But the unrest grew after the game. Police said it was unclear who had taken part in the riots, telling local media that those involved were wearing dark clothing.

    Several videos circulated on social media, with one showing a man being kicked and beaten on the ground and another showing someone being run over. In some videos, people could be heard shouting pro-Palestinian slogans, although the footage has not been verified by the BBC.

    Israeli President Isaac Herzog spoke of a “pogrom” against Maccabi fans and Israeli citizens. Dutch anti-Islam politician Geert Wilders who leads the biggest party in parliament also spoke of a pogrom, saying “authorities will be held accountable for their failure to protect the Israeli citizens”.

    Amsterdam Mayor Femke Halsema had earlier sought to prevent trouble by moving pro-Palestinian protesters away from the Johan Cruyff Arena. But Dutch reports said a large group had then tried to head to the stadium, only to be stopped by riot police.

    Herzog said on X that he trusted the Dutch authorities would act immediately to “protect, locate and rescue all Israelis and Jews under attack”.

  • Who is Susie Wiles, The “ice maiden” Who Will Be Trump’s Chief Of Staff?

    Who is Susie Wiles, The “ice maiden” Who Will Be Trump’s Chief Of Staff?

    • Wiles got her start working for Republican President Ronald Reagan’s successful 1980 campaign.
    • Wiles is the daughter of Pat Summerall, who was a prominent football player and sportscaster.

    (Reuters)-Republican President-elect Donald Trump named campaign chief Susie Wiles as his White House chief of staff on Thursday.

    It was his first appointment since winning Tuesday’s election against Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris.

    Here are some key facts about Wiles, who is set to run day-to-day operations at the White House:

    Wiles, a longtime Republican strategist, is widely credited – along with co-campaign manager Chris LaCivita – with running the most disciplined and sophisticated of Trump’s three presidential campaigns.

    She did not always succeed at stopping Trump from going off-script, but she kept damaging media leaks to a relative minimum, launched a bold and successful strategy to win over some Latino and Black voters and led the former president to a decisive win.

    Wiles got her start working for Republican President Ronald Reagan’s successful 1980 campaign. For years, she worked with some moderate Republicans who promoted dramatically different policies than those of Trump.

    Early in her career, she worked for Republican US representatives Jack Kemp, an ardent advocate of free trade, and Tillie Fowler, who was widely considered a moderate on several issues, including gun control.

    She also served briefly as the manager of former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman Jr.’s 2012 presidential campaign. Huntsman was arguably the most moderate Republican in the field that year. He sharply criticized Trump after the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol by Trump’s supporters.

    Later in her career, Wiles started working for more combative party figures, some of whom would become Trump allies, including US Senator Rick Scott of Florida.

    Notably, she was a key figure in Ron DeSantis’ successful 2018 Florida gubernatorial campaign. She was dismissed by DeSantis after he took office.

    When Trump and DeSantis squared off in the Republican presidential primary, she presided over an aggressive and successful strategy to portray her old boss as personally off-putting and out of touch on some key policy issues.

    While Wiles is personally friendly, she is relatively little-known and enigmatic for a political strategist of her stature. She rarely gives televised interviews and avoids speaking engagements. Like many successful campaign managers, she can be ruthless when merited.

    Her personality contrasted with that of LaCivita, who was notably garrulous and outspoken.

    During his victory speech, Trump referred to Wiles as the “ice maiden.”

    Wiles is the daughter of Pat Summerall, who was a prominent football player and sportscaster. Summerall played in the National Football League for a decade and later announced 16 Super Bowls. He died in 2013.

  • Inside Trump’s Plan For Mass Deportations

    Inside Trump’s Plan For Mass Deportations

    (Reuters)- Donald Trump is expected to mobilise agencies across the US government to help him deport record numbers of immigrants, building on efforts in his first term to tap all available resources and pressure so-called “sanctuary” jurisdictions to cooperate, according to six former Trump officials and allies.

    Trump claimed victory in the 2024 presidential contest, telling supporters America had given him an “unprecedented and powerful mandate”.

    Trump backers – including some who could enter his second administration – anticipate the Republican president-elect will call on everyone from the US military to diplomats overseas to turn his campaign promise of mass deportations into a reality. The effort would include cooperation with Republican-led states and use federal funding as leverage against resistant jurisdictions.

    Trump recaptured the White House vowing a vast immigration crackdown. The centerpiece of his reelection bid was a promise to deport record numbers of immigrants, an operation Trump’s running mate JD Vance estimated could remove 1 million people per year.

    Immigrant advocates warn that Trump’s deportation effort would be costly, divisive and inhumane, leading to family separations and devastating communities.

    Trump struggled to ramp up deportations during his 2017-2021 presidency. When counting both immigration removals and faster “returns” to Mexico by U.S. border officials, Biden deported more immigrants in fiscal year 2023 than any Trump year, according to government data.

    But a deportation operation targeting millions would require many more officers, detention beds and immigration court judges. American Immigration Council, an immigrant advocacy group, estimated the cost of deporting 13 million immigrants in the US illegally as $968 billion over a little more than a decade.

    Tom Homan, a former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) expected to join the new administration, said in a late October interview that the scale of the deportations would hinge on potential officers and detention space.

    “It all depends on what the budget is,” he said.

    While the incoming Trump administration could benefit from experience gained during his first term, it could again encounter resistance from ideologically opposed government employees, including officers that screen migrants for asylum.

    The American Civil Liberties Union and immigrant advocacy groups have been preparing for court battles if Trump again tests the bounds of his legal authority.

    Lee Gelernt, an ACLU attorney who led the fight against Trump’s contentious family separation policy, said more than 15 lawyers focused on immigration with the organization’s national office spent the year readying for the possibility of a Trump return.

    “We definitely need to be coordinated and have more resources, because I think they will come in much more prepared,” Gelernt said.

    The State Department in particular could be one place where Trump acts more aggressively than during his first term, several Trump backers said.

    A key factor will be whether other countries will accept their citizens, an issue Trump faced with limited success during his first term. The Trump administration also struggled at times to convince other nations in the region – including Mexico – to take steps to stop migrants from moving toward the U.S.-Mexico border.

    Ken Cuccinelli, former acting deputy secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security under Trump, said the State Department was a “roadblock” for immigration enforcement and that aggressive appointees will be key.

    Christopher Landau, a former U.S. ambassador to Mexico from 2019-2021, recently said he was frustrated with the reluctance of some U.S. diplomats to tackle immigration enforcement.

    “Nobody really thought that was their problem,” Landau said in an October panel discussion by the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors restricting immigration.

    About half of ICE’s 21,000 employees are part of its Homeland Security Investigations unit, which focuses on transnational crime such as drug smuggling and child exploitation rather than immigration enforcement. Several Trump allies said the unit would need to spend more time on immigration.

    HSI has distanced itself from ICE’s immigration work in recent years, saying fear of deportation made it harder for its investigators to build trust in immigrant communities.

    Stephen Miller, the architect of Trump’s first-term immigration agenda, said in 2023 that National Guard troops from cooperative states could potentially be deployed to resistant states to assist with deportations, which would likely trigger legal battles.

    Trump plans to use a 1798 wartime statute known as the Alien Enemies Act to rapidly deport alleged gang members, an action that would almost certainly be challenged in court.

    The law has been used three times, according to the left-leaning Brennan Center for Justice: the War of 1812, World War One, and World War Two, when it was employed to justify internment camps for people of Japanese, German and Italian descent.

    The Brennan Center and others have called on Congress to repeal the law.

    “Many fear that a second Trump administration would seek to use this law to justify indefinite detention and remove people from the country swiftly and without judicial review,” Naureen Shah, the ACLU’s deputy director of government affairs, wrote in late October.

    George Fishman, a former DHS official under Trump, said the Trump administration would need to prove the immigrants were sent by a foreign government.

    “I worry a little about overpromising,” Fishman said.

  • Kenyans Frustrated With Their Government Celebrate Trump’s Win

    Kenyans Frustrated With Their Government Celebrate Trump’s Win

    Seven months after Kenya’s President William Ruto was hosted by President Joe Biden at the White House in a historic state visit, Donald Trump’s election victory sparked celebrations among opposition activists.

    Kenyans concerned over the perceived US backing of Ruto’s administration and some of its more unpopular economic policies are hoping for a reevaluation of US support under Trump.

    For a start, they’re calling for the removal of the Biden-appointed US ambassador to Kenya, former HP and eBay CEO Meg Whitman, who played a central role in the elevation of Kenya’s relationship with the US to non-NATO ally status in May. She has also led a push to attract investment by US tech firms to Kenya, East Africa’s largest economy.

    Calls for her removal were widely shared across social media, trending on platforms including X soon after it became apparent that Trump was headed for victory. Whitman — and by extension Washington’s — relationship with Ruto has long been seen as a problem in some quarters. Critics range from opposition activists in Kenya to officials in Washington.

    Ruto’s popularity took a hit in the months following the US state visit due to massive youth-led nationwide protests against proposed tax hikes and corruption as well as police abductions and killings of protesters. A survey published by research company InfoTrak in October said 73% of Kenyans thought the country “was headed in the wrong direction,” with corruption and police abductions among Kenyans’ top concerns.

    Ruto congratulated Trump on Thursday for his win, writing that he looked forward to “deepening our collaboration under your leadership as we work together to address global challenges”.

    Whitman faced a backlash last Thursday after the US failed to appear among signatories of a joint statement by Western envoys condemning a reported increase in abductions and enforced disappearances in the country, having previously signed similar statements alongside European counterparts. Police in the country have denied involvement in abductions.

    “If President Donald Trump’s return to the White House brings an end to Meg Whitman’s ambassadorial tenure in Nairobi, then we as Kenyans have something to celebrate,” veteran lawyer and human rights activist Gitobu Imanyara wrote on X, referencing the abductions.

    As Kamala Harris perhaps realized a little too late, in 2024 the Joe Biden hug can be damaging for political ambition. The optics of Ruto’s association with Biden — capped by the first state visit by an African leader in 15 years and Whitman’s perceived closeness to the Kenyan president — has helped fuel disaffection against the government.

    Critics of Washington’s approach see the US as an enabler of harmful government decisions in Kenya.

    However, Caroline Wandiri, an international relations professor at the Nairobi-based Kenyatta University, told me Whitman’s future would ultimately not be determined by Kenyans’ complaints, but by whether she was aligned with Trump’s vision for the US and its interests around the world. Even though Whitman was appointed by a Democratic president, she has previously run as a Republican for the governorship of California.

    Kenya has increasingly been seen as a key geopolitical partner for the US on the continent amid waning US influence in West Africa, along with increasing Russian and Chinese presence.

    “If he feels that she (Whitman) or any other person is not representing the United States’ interests very well, or if he’d want someone to confide with or get along with easily, there’s no reason not to make a change,” Wandiri said. “That would not be strange.”

  • Could Donald Trump Run Again In 2028?

    Could Donald Trump Run Again In 2028?

    (Sky News)- Donald Trump will be one of only two presidents to serve two non-consecutive terms after his US election win this week, second only to Grover Cleveland, who did it in the 1800s.

    It’s already a historic victory – but Mr Trump has made comments in the past hinting at a third term in office.

    An amendment in the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the United States, prohibits anyone from serving for more than two terms.

    But what has the incoming president said, how likely is he to pursue a third term in 2028 – and is it even possible?

    Has a third term been done before?

    Franklin Roosevelt served as US president four times from 1933 to 1945, because there was nothing in the original US Constitution which limited how many terms a president could serve.

    But later the 22nd Amendment limited presidents to two four-year terms, irrespective of whether they were served consecutively or not.

    Franklin Roosevelt during his third term as president in 1942. Pic: AP

    Congress passed the 22nd Amendment two years after Roosevelt’s death and it took effect from the 1952 election, which Republican Dwight D. Eisenhower won over Democrat Adlai Stevenson.

    No one has been able to serve more than two terms since.

    What has Trump said?

    It was in the lead-up to the 2020 election, which Mr Trump lost to Joe Biden, that he first started hinting at seeking a third term.

    At a rally in August 2020, he told supporters he would win the next election and then possibly “go for another four years” because “they spied on my campaign,” an apparent nod to his unsubstantiated claims that Barack Obama had his “wires tapped” before he was elected in 2016.

    According to Forbes, Mr Trump told another rally that if he were to win the 2020 election, he would “negotiate” a third term, adding he was “probably entitled to another four [years] after that” based on “the way we were treated”.

    But in an interview last year with Sky News’ US partner NBC News, Mr Trump was asked if there was any scenario in which he would seek a third term should he win the presidency next year, to which he responded: “No.”

    And in April 2024 he told Time magazine he “wouldn’t be in favour” of an extended term – but two vague comments he made in speeches this year have stoked rumours he could try it.

    One was during a National Rifle Association speech, when he asked supporters if he would be considered “three-term or two-term” – though this appears to be in reference to his unsubstantiated claims that he should have won the 2020 election but that it was rigged against him.

    Another came in July, when he told attendees at a conservative Christian event they wouldn’t “have to vote anymore” if he won the 2024 election, according to CBS News.

    After repeatedly telling them to vote “just this time”, he added: “In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not going to have to vote.”

    Why Trump is unlikely to try it

    John Fortier, senior research fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, says the comments from the Christian event have been taken out of context, and that Mr Trump was simply trying to “encourage the sometimes reluctant Christian community to vote in this election”.

    “Trump in office would be able to address their concerns so much so that it would not matter if they chose to vote in future elections,” he explains.

    “It was not an indication that Trump would cancel future elections or try to serve beyond his second term.”

    Offering reasons why Mr Trump would likely not pursue an extra term, Mr Fortier points out that the president-elect has previously indicated he would not have run for office again in 2028 had he lost this election, adding he “expressed a kind of wistfulness about his final campaign for office”.

    He also says Mr Trump’s age is a factor.

    The 78-year-old, who is already the oldest person to be elected president, will be 82 by the end of his second term.

    “And president Biden’s withdrawal is evidence that the American people are attuned to age-related decline and will look sceptically on octogenarian candidates for president,” Mr Fortier adds.

    Could Trump do it if he wanted to?

    It would be “virtually impossible”, according to retired Commonwealth Court judge Joseph Cosgrove.

    He would have to amend the Constitution to do it, which Mr Cosgrove says is an “arduous task”.

    “The usual method requires two-thirds of both the House and Senate to propose an amendment, which would then require three-fourths of the states to approve,” he explains.

    “Given the extremely close political divisions in the United States, neither of these events is foreseeable. Even if the Republicans control both the House and Senate, their majority will be so slim that no revision of the 22nd Amendment could ever occur in this climate.”

    Mr Fortier, who agreed with Mr Cosgrove’s points, says some legal scholars have suggested there are loopholes that could be exploited to get around the two-term limit.

    “They argue that the 22nd Amendment prohibits someone from running for a third term [but] not from serving a third term,” he says.

    “And by an ingenious trick, a term-limited president could be elected to the vice presidency or placed in the line of succession and then ascend to the presidency when those ahead of him in the line of succession resign.”

    He adds that this theory, however, ignores a number of other amendments and other constitutional laws which indicate that a vice president or someone else in the line of succession “must meet the qualifications to become president”.

    And Mr Trump, or someone else who has already served two terms as president, would not meet that criteria thanks to the 22nd Amendment.

  • Kenyan-Born Huldah Momanyi Hiltsley Makes History After Winning Minnesota House Seat

    Kenyan-Born Huldah Momanyi Hiltsley Makes History After Winning Minnesota House Seat

    Kenyan-American Huldah Momanyi Hiltsley has made history after she won a seat in the Minnesota House of Representatives.

    She now becomes the first Kenyan-born politician to hold office in the United States of America.

    The Democratic-Farmer-Labour Party candidate garnered 64.78 per cent of the vote to represent southwestern Brooklyn Park and Osseo.

    In her acceptance speech, Hiltsley celebrated the historic nature of her victory, stating, “I stand here as the first Kenyan-born person ever elected in the U.S. This victory belongs to all of us; it is a testament to the resilience and strength of immigrants.”

    Originally hailing from Nyamira County, Kenya, Hiltsley moved to Minnesota at the age of nine. Since then, she has cultivated a strong reputation in public service and community advocacy, shaping her political platform around pressing issues like public safety, equitable housing, and healthcare access.

    Her campaign’s emphasis on these key concerns, combined with her grassroots approach and targeted voter outreach, played a pivotal role in connecting with voters across southwestern Brooklyn Park and Osseo.

    Hiltsley will represent a district with a significant immigrant population. Her win represents not only a personal achievement but also a broader milestone for African immigrants in the U.S. political landscape.

    She now joins the ranks of a select few African-born immigrants who have ascended to this level of office in the United States, an achievement that many see as a beacon of possibility for immigrant communities nationwide.

    “Representation matters,” Hiltsley said in her speech, adding that her victory is just one step in the journey toward a more inclusive and representative government.

  • Donald Trump Elected 47th President Of US

    Donald Trump Elected 47th President Of US

    Republican candidate Donald Trump surpassed 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the 2024 US presidential election, The Associated Press said on Wednesday.

    Trump defeated his Democratic rival Vice President Kamala Harris in Tuesday’s race, winning 277 Electoral College votes and securing his spot as the nation’s 47th president.

    He won key swing states, including North Carolina, Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as well as Indiana, Kentucky, West Virginia, Florida, Tennessee, South Carolina, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Alabama, Arkansas, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Louisiana, Ohio, Texas, Missouri, Utah, Montana, Kansas, Iowa, and Idaho.

    Trump has thanked Americans “for the extraordinary honor of being elected your 47th president and your 45th president,” referring to his earlier term in office, 2017-2021, before Joe Biden won four years as the 46th US president.

    “This is a magnificent victory for the American people that will allow us to make America great again,” he said.

    The win would make Trump only the second US president to serve non-consecutive terms, following Grover Cleveland, who served two separate terms in the late 1800s, with President Benjamin Harrison in between.

  • Trump Claims Victory After Fox News Projects He Has Won US Presidency

    Trump Claims Victory After Fox News Projects He Has Won US Presidency

    (Reuters) – Republican Donald Trump claimed victory in the 2024 presidential contest after Fox News projected that he had defeated Democrat Kamala Harris, which would cap a stunning political comeback four years after he left the White House.

    “America has given us an unprecedented and powerful mandate,” he said early on Wednesday to a roaring crowd of supporters at the Palm Beach County Convention Center.

    Other news outlets had yet to call the race for Trump, but he appeared on the verge of winning after capturing the battleground states of Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Georgia and holding leads in the other four, according to Edison Research.

    Harris did not speak to her supporters, who had gathered at her alma mater Howard University. Her campaign co-chair, Cedric Richmond, briefly addressed the crowd after midnight, saying Harris would speak publicly on Wednesday.

    “We still have votes to count,” he said.

    The former president was showing strength across broad swaths of the country, improving on his 2020 performance everywhere from rural areas to urban centers.

    Republicans won a U.S. Senate majority after flipping Democratic seats in West Virginia and Ohio. Neither party appeared to have an edge in the fight for control of the House of Representatives where Republicans currently hold a narrow majority.

    Trump went into Election Day with a 50-50 chance of reclaiming the White House, a remarkable turnaround from Jan. 6, 2021, when many pundits pronounced his political career to be over. That day, a mob of his supporters stormed Congress in a violent attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

    Trump picked up more support from Hispanics, traditionally Democratic voters, and among lower-income households that have keenly felt the sting of price rises since the last presidential election in 2020, according to exit polls from Edison.

    Trump won 45% of Hispanic voters nationwide, trailing Harris with 53% but up 13 percentage points from 2020.

    About 31% of voters said the economy was their top issue, and they voted for Trump by a 79%-to-20% margin, according to exit polls. Some 45% of voters across the country said their family’s financial situation was worse off today than four years ago, and they favored Trump 80% to 17%.

    Global investors were increasingly pricing in a Trump win late on Tuesday. U.S. stock futures and the dollar pushed higher, while Treasury yields climbed and bitcoin rose – all flagged by analysts and investors as trades that favor a Trump victory.

    At Howard University, where a large watch party was being held for Harris, supporters were leaving in droves, anticipating that the vice president would not address the crowd on Tuesday night.

    Cedric Richmond, a co-chair of the Harris campaign, briefly addressed the crowd and said Harris would not speak. “We still have votes to count,” he said. “We still have states that haven’t been called yet.”

    TRUMP OUTPERFORMS 2020

    Trump was earning a bigger share of the vote than he did four years ago in nearly every corner of the country.

    By 12:30 a.m. ET, officials had nearly completed their count of ballots in more than 1,600 counties – about half the country – and Trump’s share was up about 2 percentage points compared to 2020, reflecting a broad if not especially deep shift in Americans’ support for the president they ousted four years ago.

    He improved his numbers in suburban counties, rural regions and even some large cities that are historically bastions of Democratic support; in high-income counties and low-income ones; and in places where unemployment was comparatively high and in places where it is now at record lows.

    Harris had banked on big margins among urban and suburban voters, but her support in those places was running well behind President Joe Biden’s in the 2020 election.

    Nearly three-quarters of voters said American democracy is under threat, according to the exit polls, underscoring the depth of polarization in a nation where divisions have only grown starker during a fiercely competitive race.
    Trump employed increasingly apocalyptic rhetoric while stoking unfounded fears that the election system cannot be trusted. Harris warned that a second Trump term would threaten the underpinnings of American democracy.

    Hours before polls closed, Trump claimed on his Truth Social site without evidence that there was “a lot of talk about massive CHEATING” in Philadelphia, echoing his false claims in 2020 that fraud had occurred in large, Democratic-dominated cities. In a subsequent post, he also asserted there was fraud in Detroit.

    “I don’t respond to nonsense,” Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey told Reuters.

    A Philadelphia city commissioner, Seth Bluestein, replied on X, “There is absolutely no truth to this allegation.”

    DIZZYING CAMPAIGN

    Trump voted earlier near his home in Palm Beach, Florida.

    “If I lose an election, if it’s a fair election, I’m gonna be the first one to acknowledge it,” Trump told reporters.

    Tesla CEO Elon Musk, a prominent Trump backer, watched the results at Mar-a-Lago with Trump.

    Millions of Americans waited in orderly lines to cast ballots, with only sporadic disruptions reported across a handful of states, including several non-credible bomb threats that the FBI said appeared to originate from Russian email domains.

    Tuesday’s vote capped a dizzying race churned by unprecedented events, including two assassination attempts against Trump, Biden’s surprise withdrawal and Harris’ rapid rise.

    No matter who wins, history will be made.

    Harris, 60, the first female vice president, would become the first woman, Black woman and South Asian American to win the presidency. Trump, 78, the only president to be impeached twice and the first former president to be criminally convicted, would also become the first president to win non-consecutive terms in more than a century.

  • When Will The US Election Results Be Announced?

    When Will The US Election Results Be Announced?

    (Reuters) – The U.S. presidential election will take place on Nov. 5, but the winner of the razor-thin race between Democrat Kamala Harris and Republican Donald Trump may not be known for days after the polls close.

    As ballots are counted, one candidate may appear to be leading based on early returns, only for a rival to close the gap as more votes are tallied.

    In 2020, some states experienced a “red mirage,” in which Trump appeared to be leading on election night, before a “blue shift” saw Democrat Joe Biden overtake him, a phenomenon Trump used to amplify his false claims that the election was stolen.

    Nothing untoward had occurred. Democrats tend to live in more populous urban areas, where counting votes takes longer. Democrats also have embraced mail voting more readily than Republicans after Trump’s false claims that mail ballots are untrustworthy, and those ballots take longer to count than Election Day votes. Trump has both encouraged and criticized early and mail-in voting in 2024.

    Democrats are outpacing Republicans in mail ballots once again this year, according to an early vote tracker maintained by the University of Florida’s Election Lab, though Republicans have narrowed the gap.

    There are seven battleground states likely to decide the election, each with its own rules for handling and counting ballots. Here’s what to expect on Election Day and beyond:

    ARIZONA

    Voting by mail is extremely popular in Arizona; nearly 90% of voters cast their ballots early, most by mail, in 2020. Election officials in Arizona can begin processing and tabulating mail ballots upon receipt, but results cannot be released until one hour after polls close.

    Any mail ballots dropped off on Election Day itself cannot be processed until the polls have closed. That is often a sizable number – in 2022, those “late early” votes comprised one-fifth of all ballots in Maricopa County, the state’s largest – and can take days to count.

    The initial results on election night should be mostly early votes, which could favor Harris, before the numbers shift toward Trump as Election Day votes are tallied.

    GEORGIA

    Early in-person voting is popular in Georgia, where officials expect 65% to 70% of ballots to be cast at early poll locations. Absentee or mail ballots, which may comprise around 5% of the vote, can be processed – which includes steps such as verifying signatures – starting two weeks before the election, though workers must wait until Election Day to begin counting them.

    All early votes – in-person and mail – must be counted and reported by 8 p.m. ET (0000 GMT) on election night, according to state law, which could create a “blue mirage” in Harris’ favor at first. Officials are aiming to have all votes, including those from Election Day, tallied by midnight.

    Ballots from overseas and military voters will be accepted up to three days after the election if postmarked by Nov. 5. There were more than 21,000 such ballots requested, so an extremely close election might not be resolved until those votes are tabulated.

    MICHIGAN

    Since the 2020 election, Michigan has instituted early in-person voting for the first time and begun permitting jurisdictions with more than 5,000 people to begin processing and tabulating mail ballots eight days before Election Day. Smaller jurisdictions can do so the day before Nov. 5.

    Officials hope those changes will allow the state to report results more quickly than in 2020, when mail ballots could not be processed in advance. That created a “red mirage” on election night, when the state’s early counts of Election Day votes favored Trump. Biden eventually surpassed Trump on the strength of mail ballots, which took longer to tally. Trump falsely claimed he was the victim of fraud.

    NEVADA

    Nevada’s slow vote counting in 2020 – news outlets did not call the state for Biden until five days after Election Day – launched countless memes, but officials say changes since then should speed up the process.

    Most notably, counties were permitted to begin processing and counting mail ballots on Oct. 21. In addition, workers can start tabulating early in-person votes at 8 a.m. PT (1500 GMT) on Election Day, rather than waiting until polls close.

    But Nevada still might not get called right away. Mail voting has grown popular in the state, and it is the only battleground that accepts late-arriving mail ballots. That could also create a “blue shift” as more votes are counted.

    Any ballot postmarked by Nov. 5 will still be counted if it arrives within four days. Those late ballots historically favor Democrats, so a shift toward Harris could occur as votes are counted after Election Day.

    NORTH CAROLINA

    Election officials start processing and scanning mail ballots ahead of Election Day. After polls close, the first reported results will likely be mostly mail ballots as well as early in-person votes. Election Day votes will be counted and reported throughout the evening, with full results expected by midnight.

    Harris may appear to lead early thanks to mail ballots, while Trump could close the gap as Election Day votes are counted.

    If the election is as close as polls suggest, the outcome in North Carolina may remain unclear for a week or more. Absentee ballots that arrive on Nov. 5, as well as ballots from overseas and military voters, are tallied during the 10-day canvass period that follows Election Day. In 2020, media outlets did not call North Carolina for Trump until Nov. 13, 10 days after the election.

    PENNSYLVANIA

    Perhaps the most important battleground, Pennsylvania did not have a clear winner in 2020 for four days after Election Day, as officials sifted through a huge backlog of mail ballots. The state is among only a handful that do not permit election workers to process or tabulate mail ballots until 7 a.m. ET on Election Day, which means it will likely again take days before the outcome is known.

    With more Democrats than Republicans voting by mail, the early results – based on in-person Election Day votes – will probably show Trump ahead, but his lead will likely shrink as more mail ballots are counted.

    That pattern in 2020 prompted Trump to falsely claim fraud. This year, a new law requires most counties to announce at midnight on election night how many mail ballots remain to be counted in an effort to forestall conspiracy theories.

    WISCONSIN

    Like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin is among the few states that do not allow election officials to process or count mail ballots until the morning of the election, which means there can be a delay in reporting the results of those early votes.

    In addition, many of the state’s largest cities transport mail ballots to a centralized location for processing and tabulating. That can lead to significant batches of votes getting reported all at once in the early morning after polls close.

    In 2020, Trump and his allies falsely claimed fraud after Milwaukee, the state’s largest city, reported nearly 170,000 absentee ballots around 3:30 a.m. CT (0830 GMT), giving Biden a huge spike that moved him into the lead for the first time. But that increase was expected due to the way the city processes those ballots and the fact that Democrats were more likely to vote by mail. A similar pattern is probable in 2024.

  • What Will Decide The US Election and Why It’s So Close

    What Will Decide The US Election and Why It’s So Close

    (BBC)- Never in recent US political history has the outcome of a presidential been so in doubt – this is not a contest for the faint of heart.

    While past elections have been narrowly decided – George W Bush’s 2000 victory over Al Gore came down to a few hundred votes in Florida – there’s always been some sense of which direction the race was tilting in the final days.

    Sometimes, as in 2016, the sense is wrong. In that year, polls overestimated Hillary Clinton’s strength and failed to detect a late-breaking movement in Donald’s Trump favour.

    This time around, however, the arrows are all pointing in different directions. No-one can seriously make a prediction either way.

    A coin-toss

    Most of the final polls are well within the margin of error, both nationally and in the seven key battleground states that will decide the election.

    Based on statistics and sample sizes alone, that means either candidate could be ahead.

    It is this uncertainty that vexes political pundits and campaign strategists alike.

    There have been a smattering of surprises – not least one notable example, a recent respected survey of Republican-leaning Iowa giving Harris a shock lead.

    But the major polling averages, and the forecasting models that interpret them, all show this as a coin-toss contest.

    A clear winner is still possible

    Just because the outcome of this election is uncertain, that doesn’t mean the actual result won’t be decisive – a shift of a few percentage points either way, and a candidate could sweep all of the battleground states.

    If the voter turnout models are wrong and more women head to the polls, or more rural residents, or more disaffected young voters – that could dramatically shift the final results.

    There could also be surprises among key demographic groups.

    Will Trump really make the inroads with young black and Latino men that his campaign has predicted? Is Harris winning over a larger proportion of traditionally Republican suburban women, as her team is hoping? Are elderly voters – who reliably vote every election and tend to lean to the right – moving into the Democratic column?

    Once this election is in the rear-view mirror, we may be able to conclusively point to a reason why the winning candidate came out on top.

    Perhaps, in hindsight, the answer will be obvious. But anyone who says they know how things will turn out right now is fooling you – and themselves.

    Blue Walls and Red Walls

    In most US states the outcome of the presidential vote is all but certain. But there are seven key battleground states that will decide this election.

    Not all battleground states are created equal, however. Each candidate has a “wall” of three states that offers the most direct path to the White House.

    Harris’s so-called “blue” wall, named for the colour of the Democratic Party, stretches across Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin in the Great Lakes region. It has been the subject of much political conversation since 2016, when Trump narrowly won all three traditionally Democratic states on his way to victory.

    Joe Biden flipped these states back in 2020. If Harris can hold them, she doesn’t need any other battleground, as long as she also wins a congressional district in Nebraska (which has a slightly different system in how it awards its electoral college votes).

    That explains why she has spent the bulk of her time in these blue wall states during the campaign’s final stretch, with full days on the ground in each.

    On Monday night, she held her final rally in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, at the top of the 72 steps leading to the city’s Museum of Art, which Sylvester Stallone’s fictional boxer Rocky climbed in the film of the same name – before narrowly losing to his opponent, Apollo Creed.

    Trump’s “red wall” sits along the eastern edge of the US. It is less talked about but equally important to his electoral chances. It starts in Pennsylvania but stretches south to North Carolina and Georgia. If he carries these states, he will win by two electoral votes, no matter how the other battlegrounds vote.

    That explains why he’s held five events in North Carolina in just in the last week.

    The overlapping point on each of these walls, of course, is Pennsylvania – the biggest battleground electoral prize. Its nickname, the Keystone State, has never been more appropriate.

    America’s future in the balance

    Sometimes lost in all this electoral map strategising and gameplay is the historic significance of this presidential election.

    Harris and Trump represent two very different views of the US – on immigration, trade, cultural issues and foreign policy.

    The president for the next four years will be able to shape American government – including the federal courts – in a way that could have an impact for generations.

    The US political landscape has been changing dramatically over the past four years, reflecting shifts in the demographic make-ups of both parties.

    The Republican Party of a decade ago looked very different to the populist one that Trump now leads, which has far more appeal to blue-collar and low-income voters.

    The Democratic Party’s base still rests on young voters and people of colour, but it now relies more on the wealthy and college educated.

    Tuesday’s results may offer additional evidence of how these tectonic shifts in American politics, only partially realised over the past eight years, are reshaping the US political map.

    And those shifts could give one side or the other an advantage in future races.

    It wasn’t too long ago – in the 1970s and 1980s – that Republicans were viewed as having a unassailable lock on the presidency because they consistently won a majority in enough states to prevail in the electoral college.

    This election may be a 50-50 contest, but that doesn’t mean this is the new normal in American presidential politics.

  • How Trump Is Preparing The Ground To Challenge The US Election

    How Trump Is Preparing The Ground To Challenge The US Election

    (FRANCE 24)-History, as the saying goes, doesn’t repeat itself, but it does often rhyme. Four years after refusing to concede to Joe Biden with unproven claims of electoral fraud that culminated in the January 6 assault on the Capitol, former president Donald Trump is once again casting doubt on the US presidential election.

    Now in a close race against Vice President Kamala Harris, Trump and his allies have prepared for years to challenge the outcome if he loses, with strategies aimed at questioning election integrity on multiple fronts.

    From the outset of his campaign, Trump has focused heavily on casting doubt on the election process. During the June presidential debate, he was asked three times if he would accept the results of the 2024 election. His answer: he would only do so if the election was “fair and legal and good”.

    At his campaign rallies, Trump has urged supporters to anticipate a victory while implying that any loss would be due to corruption.

    “I’d love to win the popular vote with them cheating. Let them cheat, because that’s what they do; they do it very well, they’re very professional. But I think we have a really good chance to win the popular vote,” he told supporters at a rally in Salem, Virginia, on Saturday.

    On social media, he has amplified claims of fraud, especially in battleground states like Pennsylvania, where he recently posted allegations about “fake ballots” and other claims of supposed irregularities.

    “We caught them CHEATING BIG in Pennsylvania. Must announce and PROSECUTE, NOW!” Trump wrote on Truth Social, adding, “Who would have ever thought our country could be so CORRUPT?”

    This rhetoric sparked rapid responses from officials. Democratic Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro responded on X, saying, “In 2020, Donald Trump attacked our elections over and over. He’s now trying to use the same playbook to stoke chaos, but hear me on this: we will again have a free and fair, safe and secure election – and the will of the people will be respected.”

    Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Al Schmidt, a Republican, echoed this, telling CNN that any allegations of fraud were “completely and totally unfounded”. “Voters should have confidence we will have a fair election in 2024, just like we had in 2020,” Schmidt said.

    Lawsuits galore

    After Trump’s loss in 2020, his team initiated 60 court cases across multiple states to challenge the results, alleging widespread fraud, though none succeeded. This experience led Trump’s team to refine their approach for 2024. According to Olivier Richomme, an electoral law expert and professor of American history at Lyon 2 University, the strategy this time is broader and more calculated.

    “Trump has an army of lawyers, co-ordinated by his political adviser Stephen Miller,” Richomme explained. “They’ve already initiated lawsuits well ahead of the election and intend to continue afterward.”

    The Republican National Committee (RNC) filed more than 120 lawsuits in 26 states from 2020 through August this year, contesting various election rules. An RNC spokesperson claimed the party’s primary goal was to address issues in voting systems to prevent illegal ballots before Election Day.

    “Our Election Integrity operation is focused on securing transparency and fairness for every legal vote,” RNC spokesperson Claire Zunk told Reuters last month. “This ensures voters feel confident that their ballots are counted properly, which ultimately inspires voter turnout.”

    Launched in April, the Election Integrity Network is the largest initiative of its kind in US history, enlisting thousands of lawyers and volunteers to address perceived election interference. A number of high-profile conservative donors contributed over $140 million to some 50 groups working to support this effort, according to the Wall Street Journal, funding a comprehensive network for election monitoring, and extensive litigation.

    But investigations have found that voter fraud is actually quite rare. A comprehensive audit of elections in the US state of Georgia released last month found that only 20 noncitizens had tried to registered to vote out of 8.2 million registered voters; an additional 156 were flagged for further investigation. Claims that voting machines can be rigged to “flip” votes from one candidate to another have also circulated for years. But “every single” such instance is attributable to human error and not a hacked machine, according to David Becker, founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, in an interview with CBS News.

    Breeding distrust for future elections

    Unlike four years ago, Trump no longer holds presidential powers, which limits his influence over US institutions. Without a vice president on his side or a direct line to the attorney general, Trump’s means of challenging the election are reduced.

    However, Trump’s years of sowing doubt in the electoral process have done irreparable damage to public confidence. “The real problem is that he has planted the idea in the minds of the American people that there is a problem with electoral fraud,” Richomme said. “We’re seeing a growing part of the electorate suspicious of elections.”

    Trump’s allies within the GOP are mirroring his rhetoric, with nearly half of Republican candidates for Congress or state office publicly questioning the upcoming election’s integrity. For instance, Illinois House Representative Brian Babin recently posted on X, claiming that “Democrat counties refuse to clean up voter rolls, are counting aliens in censuses, and are using Harris’ open borders to replace US voters to hold a perpetual majority”.

    Richomme warns that this rising tide of mistrust could alter American politics well beyond this election.

    “There are more and more cases of Republican elected officials who make a habit of questioning election results. They will run for office but refuse to accept election results when they don’t go their way.”

    ‘A weakening of American democracy’

    Democrats are also gearing up for a contested election, including any premature declarations of victory from Trump. Vice President Kamala Harris announced plans for a rapid-response strategy to counter any such claims.

    “We are sadly ready if he does and, if we know that he is actually manipulating the press and attempting to manipulate the consensus of the American people … we are prepared to respond,” Harris said during an interview with ABC in late October.

    Democrats have also prepared a team of thousands of lawyers to respond to any legal challenges lodged by the Trump campaign.

    However, in the event of an actual Trump win, Democrats have signaled they would refrain from questioning the results. As Richomme points out, “It’s not in the Democrats’ tradition, and they campaigned against such actions when Trump was doing it. They’ve made it clear they believe the electoral system functions effectively.”

    Regardless of the outcome, this election will likely leave a significant impact on American democratic institutions. Richomme observes that the damage from Trump’s rhetoric may linger long after the votes are counted.

    “We are witnessing a weakening of American democracy. This erosion of confidence in the electoral system poses serious threats,” he warned.

    With Americans increasingly sceptical of the integrity of US elections, the November vote could prove a defining moment for the future of US political norms.