Kenya Insights

Category: Politics

  • Hassan Joho Endorses Ruto for 2027, Declares 2032 Presidential Run

    Hassan Joho Endorses Ruto for 2027, Declares 2032 Presidential Run

    Hassan Joho has finally cleared the air. After months of speculation, the flamboyant former Mombasa governor and current Mining Cabinet Secretary has made it official — he will run for president in 2032.

    At a charged rally in Garsen, Tana River County, Joho not only declared his presidential ambitions but also publicly backed President William Ruto’s re-election bid in 2027.

    The announcement marks a major political realignment and signals Joho’s strategic patience. By endorsing Ruto now and sitting out 2027, Joho is positioning himself as a future contender with national appeal and political maturity.

    Hassan Joho Endorses Ruto for 2027, Declares 2032 Presidential Run
    The Hassan Joho 2032 Presidential Run is no longer a rumor — it’s a well-calculated, public declaration of intent. By endorsing Ruto now, Joho gains valuable time, influence, and visibility. He separates himself from old opposition tactics and aligns himself with power while laying the groundwork for a serious presidential bid. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Why Hassan Joho 2032 Presidential Run Begins with Ruto’s Endorsement

    Speaking to a sea of supporters in Garsen, Joho declared his full support for Ruto’s presidency and stated that he would only seek the presidency after Ruto completes his second term in 2032.

    “We will hold William Ruto’s hand and accompany him, whatever it takes. Once he clocks 2032, we will be waiting for that seat,” Joho proclaimed, triggering loud applause.

    This move puts Joho on a long-term political path, signaling the start of his national campaign. While critics have questioned ODM’s decision to collaborate with the Kenya Kwanza administration, Joho defended the shift and warned against being dragged into unnecessary political feuds.

    “We from the Coast can’t be taken to a fight that is not ours. We cannot be used as weapons to fight people who are not our enemies,” he said.

    By refusing to fight “other people’s battles,” Joho distanced himself from opposition hardliners still pushing confrontational politics. He also reassured President Ruto of full backing from the coastal voting bloc, saying the Head of State had already made major inroads in the region.

    Joho’s Shift from Coastal Kingpin to National Contender

    Joho’s rise from a Mombasa strongman to a national figure has not been accidental. In 2024, he made it clear that he had outgrown county politics and was now aiming for the top seat. He openly rejected suggestions to return to local office.

    “I want to tell them I am done with Mombasa politics; I am now focusing on national politics,” Joho declared months before his appointment to the Cabinet.

    His transition to the Mining docket gave him a new platform to interact with diverse communities, gain national exposure, and build alliances across party lines. His recent moves show he’s not just waiting for 2032 — he’s laying a strong foundation now.

    Interestingly, ODM party leader Raila Odinga has in the past hinted that Joho would eventually be the party’s flagbearer. Raila has repeatedly said that no political seat in ODM is reserved for anyone, possibly setting the stage for an internal contest.

    With Raila now warming up to a working relationship with Ruto’s government and even taking on AU roles, the ODM power vacuum could open doors for Joho to rise.

    Joho, Babu Owino, and the Battle for ODM’s Future

    As Raila gradually exits active politics, the race to fill his shoes is intensifying. Joho’s strategic move could place him at the front of the queue. However, he is not alone.

    Embakasi East MP Babu Owino, a fellow ODM member, has also thrown his hat in the presidential ring. In April, Owino claimed that he is the only Kenyan capable of defeating Ruto in a presidential contest.

    “I am overqualified for the position. I relate with the suffering of ordinary Kenyans because I have lived through their struggles,” he said.

    While Owino brings youth, energy, and grassroots appeal, Joho carries experience, national connections, and a Cabinet post that could expand his reach further. The coming years may see a fierce rivalry between these two within ODM — or a surprising alliance.

    But unlike Babu, Joho is not rushing. By backing Ruto in 2027, he avoids a direct fight now, builds goodwill with the current administration, and keeps ODM’s house from falling apart.

    Conclusion

    As the political climate shifts, the country will watch closely. Will Joho emerge as Raila Odinga’s true political heir? Will he hold the coastal bloc together while expanding nationally? One thing is clear — the 2027 election may belong to Ruto, but 2032 has a new contender, and his name is Hassan Joho.

  • Larry Madowo Shuts Down 2027 Presidential Bid Calls with a Firm No

    Larry Madowo Shuts Down 2027 Presidential Bid Calls with a Firm No

    Kenyan journalist Larry Madowo has shut down growing calls for him to run in the 2027 presidential election. Madowo, currently a CNN correspondent, responded to a fan on social media who suggested he should vie for the country’s top seat with a simple but firm response—“Immediately No!”

    This bold rejection came despite increasing public admiration for his fearless reporting, especially on government accountability, protests, and national scandals. His stance confirms that he is committed to journalism, not politics, even as his influence continues to grow.

    Larry Madowo Shuts Down 2027 Presidential Bid Calls with a Firm No
    Larry Madowo may have rejected politics, but his impact continues to grow. His refusal to run for president in 2027 shows that he prefers the power of the pen to the trappings of public office. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Larry Madowo Dismisses Political Ambitions Amid Rising Public Support

    Calls for Larry Madowo to enter politics have gained momentum online, especially after his consistent coverage of protests and poor governance under President William Ruto’s administration.

    But Madowo is not interested.

    “You elect me, and then little by little we hear ‘Madowo Must Go’?” he wrote in response to the idea of running for president. His words reflect a deep concern with how fast Kenyan leaders fall from public favour—something he has covered firsthand throughout his journalism career.

    While he did not provide a concrete reason for rejecting the idea, his sarcasm hinted at his desire to avoid the backlash, hate, and endless pressure that come with public office. His supporters, however, remain adamant that Kenya needs brave, honest, and bold voices like his in political leadership.

    Why Madowo’s Name Came Up in 2027 Talks

    The public has grown tired of traditional politicians. Madowo, with his fearless reporting and global platform, has become a trusted voice for the voiceless.

    He gained even more popularity during his coverage of the anti-Finance Bill protests in 2023 and 2024. Madowo braved the tear gas, police beatings, and chaos to deliver raw, unfiltered stories from the ground. Protesters welcomed him with cheers and applause. So powerful was his presence on June 25, 2024, that netizens celebrated his last-minute arrival to cover the protests, even after experiencing flight delays in London.

    During the protests, crowds often surrounded him, excited to see him documenting their struggles. At one point, Madowo had to plead with supporters to give him space so his live footage wouldn’t be disrupted. That level of connection with ordinary citizens has led many to believe he would make a great leader.

    His influence grew not just from protest coverage but also from exposing poor infrastructure at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA). He filmed leaking roofs, power outages, and the lack of shade at pick-up points—issues that embarrassed the government.

    Government Criticism and Madowo’s Unyielding Stance

    Government officials have not taken kindly to Madowo’s reporting. Transport CS Kipchumba Murkomen slammed him for highlighting the poor state of JKIA.

    In a dismissive tone, Murkomen accused Madowo of pretending to notice the problems only after living abroad. “I was laughing because Larry was with us in the country for the last 50 years when that airport was like that,” Murkomen said mockingly.

    But the criticism didn’t stop Madowo. When Murkomen later became Interior CS, he once again took aim at the journalist—this time accusing international media, including CNN, of unfairly portraying Kenya in their protest coverage while treading carefully when reporting on Western countries.

    Madowo hit back by standing firm on his journalistic principles. He stated clearly that he would always report what he sees, truthfully and without bias.

    His boldness, however, has come at a cost. He has received anonymous threats following his reporting, but has not backed down.

  • Gachagua Ally Abducted in Midnight Raid as Police Accused of Operating Like Thugs

    Gachagua Ally Abducted in Midnight Raid as Police Accused of Operating Like Thugs

    Shock and fear have gripped the family of Peter Kawanjiru, a close ally of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, after he was allegedly abducted by police in Limuru on Monday night.

    Witnesses say more than 10 vehicles stormed the area, followed by gunshots, chaos, and a power blackout. The family claims no arrest warrant was shown, and since then, Kawanjiru has vanished.

    As Kenya witnesses a worrying rise in forced disappearances, many believe the abduction was politically motivated, targeting critics of the government.

    Gachagua Ally Abducted in Midnight Raid as Police Accused of Operating Like Thugs
    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, who has faced a barrage of political and legal attacks since leaving office, is yet to issue an official statement. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Gachagua Ally Abducted Under Mysterious Circumstances

    Tension continues to rise after Gachagua ally Peter Kawanjiru was allegedly abducted by officers believed to be from the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI). According to his family, the officers stormed their home in Limuru on Monday night, broke down the doors, and forcibly dragged Kawanjiru away.

    Eyewitnesses described the scene as terrifying. Over ten unmarked vehicles surrounded the compound at around 8:30 p.m., followed by a sudden blackout. Moments later, loud banging and gunshots echoed through the neighbourhood.

    “They said they were from DCI Kiambu Road and were looking for Kawanjiru. When we didn’t open the door, they started hitting it with metal rods,” a family member told NTV.

    Kawanjiru, a youth leader in the Democracy for Citizens Party (DCP), has been a vocal critic of the Kenya Kwanza administration. He is known for leading grassroots mobilization campaigns under the ‘Wan tam’ slogan—an increasingly popular youth movement expressing dissatisfaction with the current regime.

    Despite the violent manner of his arrest, the officers presented no warrant, nor did they explain the reason behind the operation. “I asked them if he had killed or stolen from anyone, but they said, ‘We’re just doing our job,’” said one of Kawanjiru’s relatives.

    Family Left in the Dark as Search for Kawanjiru Intensifies

    Since Monday night, Kawanjiru’s family has been desperately searching for him across police stations in Kiambu and Nairobi. But no official has confirmed holding him, and no formal charges have been filed.

    “We’ve gone from one police station to another, and no one knows anything,” the family said. “It’s like he vanished into thin air.”

    This incident has sparked public outrage and concern over growing cases of forced disappearances. Kawanjiru’s supporters and human rights activists say his abduction is the latest in a disturbing pattern targeting critics of the state.

    His disappearance closely mirrors that of Juja MP George Koimburi—another Gachagua ally—who was reported missing barely a month ago. At the time, the DCI claimed Koimburi had staged his own abduction, a narrative the MP strongly rejected.

    After being found and hospitalized at Karen Hospital, Koimburi described being forcefully taken while leaving a church service. He insisted the ordeal was real and politically motivated.

    These back-to-back incidents have raised red flags over the use of state machinery to silence dissenting voices.

    Mounting Pressure on State Over Political Intimidation

    The alleged abduction of Peter Kawanjiru has ignited a national debate on political repression and the weaponization of security forces.

    Kenyans are increasingly speaking out on social media, with hashtags such as #WhereIsKawanjiru and #StopAbductions trending across platforms. Many demand answers from the DCI and Interior Ministry, warning that such incidents are dragging the country back to a dark past.

    Civil society groups and legal experts have also condemned the state’s silence. “If police arrested Kawanjiru legally, they must come clean. But if he was abducted, it’s a violation of his rights and the Constitution,” said one Nairobi-based lawyer.

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, who has faced a barrage of political and legal attacks since leaving office, is yet to issue an official statement. However, those close to him say his allies are being systematically hunted down for opposing the ruling coalition.

    The UK and other Western embassies have previously warned against the rising trend of police brutality and enforced disappearances in Kenya, urging the government to respect the rule of law and protect civil liberties.

    Dr. Ed Barnett, the UK’s Deputy High Commissioner to Kenya, recently defended the right to peaceful expression, stating that “no democracy should punish dissent with fear and violence.”

    With no word on Kawanjiru’s whereabouts and rising anxiety among the public, pressure is now mounting on the government to account for his safety—and to stop the cycle of illegal arrests and intimidation tactics.

  • Nairobi Residents Sign Petition to Impeach Governor Sakaja, Here’s The Details

    Nairobi Residents Sign Petition to Impeach Governor Sakaja, Here’s The Details

    A group of Nairobi residents has filed a formal petition with the county assembly seeking to initiate impeachment proceedings against Governor Johnson Sakaja, accusing him of gross misconduct and violation of constitutional provisions.

    The Petition Details

    The petition, led by Bonface Sila Munyao, accuses Governor Sakaja of gross misconduct, violation of the Constitution and national laws, abuse of office, and systematic infringement of Nairobians’ rights.

    The move represents the most serious challenge to Sakaja’s leadership since he took office as Nairobi’s fourth governor in August 2022.

    According to the petition filed with the Nairobi County Assembly, “Governor Sakaja’s actions constitute gross misconduct, abuse of office, and wilful violation of the Constitution. He has betrayed the trust of Nairobians and must be held accountable”.

    Key Allegations

    The petitioners have raised several serious allegations against the governor, including:

    Harassment and Intimidation: Munyao accused Sakaja of using goons to harass residents and suppress dissent, especially in areas affected by various county policies. This allegation suggests a pattern of intimidation tactics against critics of the governor’s administration.

    Constitutional Violations: The petition alleges systematic violations of the Constitution and national laws, pointing to decisions and policies that the petitioners claim exceed the governor’s mandate or contravene established legal frameworks.

    Abuse of Office: The residents claim the governor has misused his position for personal or political gain, though specific details of these allegations are yet to be fully disclosed in public documents.

    Infringement of Citizens’ Rights: The petition suggests that various actions by the governor’s administration have systematically violated the rights of Nairobi residents, potentially affecting their quality of life and access to basic services.

    Governor Sakaja has been facing mounting pressure from various quarters. At least 10 officials from the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) party – led by lawmaker John Kiarie – have joined forces against Nairobi governor Johnson Sakaja. They accuse him of failing to fix Nairobi’s long list of problems, including widespread sewerage issues, clearing garbage.

    The governor has also faced criticism over urban planning decisions, with residents rejecting “the position taken by Governor Sakaja concerning the rezoning of some areas and elimination of height restriction on buildings within Nairobi county”.

    The Impeachment Process

    Under Kenya’s constitutional framework, the impeachment of a county governor requires a two-thirds majority vote in the county assembly. If the assembly votes to impeach, the matter would then proceed to the Senate for trial. The petitioners urge “all Honourable MCAs to uphold their oath under Article 74(2) and act in defence of our Constitution”.

    As of the time of filing this report, Governor Sakaja has not issued an official response to the impeachment petition. His administration has been focusing on what he describes as service delivery improvements, with recent meetings aimed at enhancing county operations.

    Johnson Sakaja was sworn in as the 4th Governor of Nairobi City County on August 25, 2022, alongside his deputy Dr. James Njoroge Muchiri. His tenure has been marked by various initiatives aimed at transforming Nairobi, though critics argue that progress has been insufficient.

    What’s Next

    The petition now awaits consideration by the Nairobi County Assembly.

    The assembly members will need to review the allegations and determine whether there are sufficient grounds to proceed with impeachment proceedings.

    The process could take several weeks or months, depending on the assembly’s schedule and the complexity of the case presented.

    The move represents a significant political development in Nairobi’s governance, with potential implications for service delivery and political stability in Kenya’s capital city.

    Residents and political observers will be watching closely as the impeachment process unfolds.

    Read the petition below.

    [pdf-embedder url=”https://cms.kenyainsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Residence-of-Nairobi-sc.pdf” title=”Residence of Nairobi sc”]

    This is a developing story. More details will be provided as they become available.

  • MPs Plot to Impeach Murkomen Over Shoot-to-Kill Remarks Amid Gen Z Protests

    MPs Plot to Impeach Murkomen Over Shoot-to-Kill Remarks Amid Gen Z Protests

    A political storm is gathering around Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen as a section of lawmakers initiates a bid to impeach him over inflammatory comments made in the wake of the June 25 “Gen Z” protests.

    Manyatta MP Gitonga Mukunji is leading the charge, accusing Murkomen of advocating for extrajudicial killings after the CS directed police to shoot protesters who approach police stations during demonstrations. Speaking at Harambe House on June 26, Murkomen’s comments sparked immediate outrage across political, legal, and civic spaces.

    “Bwana Waziri Murkomen, you don’t deserve to be the Minister of Interior if you can say people should be shot by guns meant to protect them,” Mukunji declared. “I’m calling on MPs to support an impeachment motion. I’m collecting numbers till Tuesday.”

    Mukurweini MP John Kaguchia added legal weight to the calls, asserting that Murkomen’s remarks violated Articles 21, 26, and 37 of the Constitution—provisions that guarantee the right to life, human dignity, and peaceful assembly.

    Murkomen, in a bid to defuse the backlash, has claimed he was misquoted. But critics aren’t buying it. Radio host Ndu Okoh of Spice FM challenged the denial, saying, “Usually, when somebody repeats something in the same manner, they mean it. He sent a message and it wasn’t a mistake.”

    Former presidential aspirant and constitutional lawyer Dr. Ekuru Aukot labeled Murkomen an “embarrassment to the legal profession,” questioning his understanding of the law despite his legal training.

    Murkomen’s former lecturer at the University of Nairobi, Prof. Kivutha Kibwana, also condemned the remarks:

    “Do you know @InteriorKE, that due to your shoot-live to murder command, you will now and in the future be held accountable for every extrajudicial extermination? How was I your teacher at UoN Law?”

    Murkomen’s comments come amid the ongoing Gen Z-led protests—an unprecedented youth-led movement triggered by economic frustrations, perceived government excesses, and the now-infamous Finance Bill. The protests have drawn national attention for their scale, tech-savviness, and spontaneous coordination, largely outside traditional political structures.

    Activist Boniface Mwangi summed up the public mood during a Monday broadcast:

    “All everyone is asking for is justice and for the Constitution to be followed. The Constitution exists, and that is the best way to give Kenyans what they are asking for.”

    The impeachment threat not only puts Murkomen on notice but also reflects growing divisions within President William Ruto’s administration. As the youth revolt intensifies, cracks are emerging even among allies who now fear political fallout from aligning too closely with controversial directives.

    Should the impeachment motion gather the requisite support, it could mark the first major Cabinet-level ouster under Ruto’s presidency—and a defining moment in how Kenya’s political establishment reckons with the digital-era power of youth-led civic action.

    All eyes are on Parliament this week as Gitonga Mukunji works to marshal the numbers required for an impeachment motion. Meanwhile, civic groups and legal experts are exploring constitutional avenues to hold Murkomen accountable beyond Parliament.

    As Gen Z protesters maintain pressure on the streets and online, the Interior CS’s fate may ultimately hinge not just on legal arguments—but on a new generation’s uncompromising demand for accountability.

  • Isiolo Governor Guyo Now Hanging on A String As His Impeachment Trial Gets Underway in the Senate With Serious Charges

    Isiolo Governor Guyo Now Hanging on A String As His Impeachment Trial Gets Underway in the Senate With Serious Charges

    Isiolo Governor Abdi Ibrahim Hassan Guyo’s political career hangs in the balance as the Senate commenced a high-stakes impeachment trial on Monday, June 30, 2025, that could determine whether he becomes the latest casualty in Kenya’s devolved governance system.

    The embattled county chief now faces seven grave charges that could see him join the ranks of impeached governors including Ferdinand Waititu of Kiambu, Mike Sonko of Nairobi, and Kawira Mwangaza of Meru, all of whom have tested the limits of Kenya’s devolution framework.

    Senate Formally Receives Charges

    Senate Speaker Amason Kingi officially read out the charges against Governor Guyo during a special sitting, following a resolution passed by the Isiolo County Assembly on June 27, 2025, where 16 out of 18 MCAs voted in favour of the impeachment motion, with two abstaining and none opposing.

    The impeachment motion, presented by Sericho MCA Abubakar Godana, invokes Article 181(1)(a), (b), and (c) of the Constitution, alongside Section 33 of the County Governments Act and Standing Order 83 of the Senate.

    The Seven Charges Detailed

    Charge 1: Gross Violation of the Constitution and Other Laws

    The most comprehensive charge accuses Governor Guyo of multiple constitutional violations. He failed to deliver the Annual State of the County Address for three consecutive years, violating Section 32(k) of the County Governments Act.

    Perhaps most damning is the allegation of creating an inflated workforce without legal basis. The governor appointed 36 advisers, 31 chief officers, and two deputy county secretaries in a county that has only six departments, resulting in a wage bill of 46 percent, breaching Articles 201(d) and (e) of the Constitution.

    The governor is also accused of creating public offices without involving the County Public Service Board, violating Articles 73, 232, and 235 of the Constitution, and ignoring County Assembly resolutions on debt management. Additionally, a discrepancy of Ksh30 million in bursary funds cannot be accounted for.

    Charge 2: Abuse of Office

    This charge centers on irregular staffing decisions. Governor Guyo appointed 36 advisers in defiance of a Salaries and Remuneration Commission circular dated July 9, 2013, and similar directives from the Transition Authority.

    Despite the county service staff establishment allowing for 18 chief officers, Governor Guyo appointed 31, while also placing them on two-year contracts, creating a “climate of fear and uncertainty”. He also failed to renew contracts for County Executive Committee members, significantly affecting service delivery continuity.

    Charge 3: Gross Misconduct

    This charge addresses ethical violations under the Leadership and Integrity Act and the Public Officer Ethics Act. Governor Guyo made public statements against Senator Fatuma Adan of Isiolo, which were considered disrespectful and sexist, amounting to gender-based psychological violence and breaching Articles 10 and 28 of the Constitution.

    He is also accused of making divisive, derogatory, and discriminatory remarks against other clans in the county, sowing discord in the community. Furthermore, he absented himself from the county for extended periods, choosing instead to run county affairs remotely from Nairobi, stalling service delivery.

    Charges 4-7: Systemic Failures

    The remaining charges focus on incompetence in managing county affairs, misappropriation of funds particularly regarding the Ksh30 million bursary discrepancy, undermining county institutions through repeated disregard for County Assembly resolutions, and improper conduct in appointments including creating non-existent positions like deputy county secretaries.

    Legal Drama and Court Intervention

    The impeachment process has been marked by legal battles and dramatic twists. The High Court in Meru ruled on Friday that the impeachment was null and void, creating confusion as the Senate proceeded with the special sitting despite the court declaring the process unlawful.

    Governor Guyo’s impeachment comes amid ongoing legal battles, with a court order having tried to block the County Assembly from debating the motion, prompting the Assembly to move proceedings to Nakuru and later to Machakos.

    The Road Ahead

    Senate Speaker Amason Kingi indicated the House will either form an 11-member committee to investigate the matter or proceed with a full hearing in plenary, with the Governor having a chance to defend himself or appoint a lawyer to do so.

    The stakes could not be higher for Governor Guyo. If the Senate upholds any of the charges, Governor Guyo will be removed from office immediately. If the charges are dismissed, he will stay in office, and the Assembly will have to wait three months before bringing another impeachment motion.

    Historical Context

    This impeachment trial represents another critical test of Kenya’s devolved system of governance. The case has drawn national attention as it mirrors past high-profile impeachments that have shaped the boundaries of gubernatorial power and accountability in Kenya’s county governments.

    Governor Guyo did not attend the County Assembly session to defend himself, despite being invited, raising questions about his strategy for the Senate proceedings.

    As the Senate prepares to deliberate on these grave allegations, Governor Guyo’s political future hangs in the balance, with the outcome likely to have significant implications for the future of devolved governance in Kenya and the accountability mechanisms designed to check the power of county executives.

    The trial continues as Kenya watches to see whether the Senate will uphold the constitutional principles of good governance or provide Governor Guyo with a political lifeline in what has become one of the most closely watched impeachment proceedings in recent memory.

  • Why Ruto Dumped Isiolo Governor Abdi Guyo: A Political Betrayal in the Making

    Why Ruto Dumped Isiolo Governor Abdi Guyo: A Political Betrayal in the Making

    The dramatic political downfall of Isiolo Governor Abdi Ibrahim Guyo represents one of the most striking examples of how quickly political alliances can crumble in Kenya’s fluid political landscape. Once a trusted ally who secretly supported President William Ruto during the 2022 elections, Guyo now finds himself impeached and isolated, a victim of both his own political miscalculations and Ruto’s strategic abandonment.

    The Rise and Fall of a Political Opportunist

    Governor Guyo’s journey from Nairobi’s Matopeni Ward MCA to Isiolo Governor was remarkable by any standard. Elected in 2022 on a Jubilee Party ticket under the Azimio La Umoja coalition, Guyo made headlines in June 2023 when he revealed he had secretly supported Ruto during the elections, subsequently defecting to the United Democratic Alliance (UDA).

    This political somersault should have been the first warning sign. A politician willing to betray his coalition partners so brazenly was unlikely to inspire long-term confidence, even from his new benefactor.

    The February Heckling: The Beginning of the End

    The turning point in Ruto-Guyo relations came during the President’s northern Kenya tour in February 2025. What was supposed to be a triumphant visit to launch the County Aggregation and Industrial Park project at Isiolo’s Prison Farm grounds turned into a political nightmare when angry youths disrupted Ruto’s speech with chants of “Ruto must go!”

    The incident was deeply embarrassing for a president who prides himself on crowd control and political choreography. More damaging were the subsequent revelations that the heckling wasn’t spontaneous but orchestrated by local political players.

    Senator Fatuma Dullo’s explosive testimony on the Senate floor pointed directly at Governor Guyo, claiming there was “documented evidence including a leaked video showing top county political leadership actively mobilising individuals to cause disruptions.” She alleged that Guyo had threatened to mobilise 5,000 people and promised “brimstone fire” against opposing leaders.

    The Security Failure That Sealed Guyo’s Fate

    Perhaps most damaging to Guyo was Dullo’s revelation that the governor had “micromanaged every aspect of the presidential schedule and programming,” deliberately keeping security agencies and other leaders in the dark. This suggested either gross incompetence or deliberate sabotage – neither of which would endear him to State House.

    For a president who takes security matters seriously, having a governor who could facilitate such a public humiliation was unforgivable. The fact that over 40 youths were subsequently arrested while the alleged orchestrators remained free only added insult to injury.

    A Pattern of Mismanagement and Controversy

    The heckling incident merely highlighted deeper problems with Guyo’s leadership that had been festering for months:

    Financial Mismanagement: Despite Isiolo receiving one of the lowest revenue allocations among counties, Guyo appointed 36 advisors and 31 chief officers, creating an unsustainable wage bill. His failure to meet county revenue targets while presiding over numerous stalled development projects painted a picture of administrative incompetence.

    Ghost Workers Scandal: A leaked payroll in October 2024 revealed irregular recruitment practices that sparked public outrage, with 11 MCAs accusing the executive of systematic fraud.

    Absentee Leadership: MCAs accused Guyo of frequently being absent from office and executing county functions from Nairobi, violating his constitutional duties.

    Misogynistic Conduct: The National Gender and Equality Commission condemned Guyo’s “misogynistic remarks” against Senator Dullo, calling them gender-based violence and demanding accountability.

    Ruto’s Silent Treatment: A Political Death Sentence

    While Guyo desperately claimed to have spoken with Ruto twice in June, insisting the president had given no orders for his removal, the silence from State House was deafening. In Kenya’s political system, presidential silence is often more damaging than outright opposition.

    When grassroots leaders pleaded with Ruto to intervene in the standoff between Guyo and the MCAs, the president remained conspicuously absent from the discourse. This calculated silence sent a clear message to both the MCAs and Guyo about where presidential sympathies lay.

    The Impeachment: A Foregone Conclusion

    By the time Sericho MCA Abubakar Godana tabled the impeachment motion on June 18, the outcome was predetermined. The fact that 16 out of 18 MCAs voted for Guyo’s removal despite his claims of external interference demonstrated the depth of local opposition to his leadership.

    The charges were comprehensive: gross misconduct, violation of the Constitution, abuse of office, and failure to uphold leadership and integrity standards. These weren’t merely technical violations but fundamental breaches of public trust.

    The Chaos That Followed: A County in Crisis

    The aftermath of the impeachment motion revealed the extent of Guyo’s isolation. Violent protests at the County Assembly, with broken doors, vandalized equipment, and MCAs requiring police protection, showed a county in political chaos.

    The emergence of two parallel power structures – with embattled Clerk Salad Boru gazetting an alternative Speaker while supporting only two MCAs – created a constitutional crisis reminiscent of similar standoffs in other counties.

    Why Ruto Cut Guyo Loose

    Several factors explain Ruto’s abandonment of his former ally:

    Reputational Damage: The February heckling incident made Guyo a political liability. Keeping him would remind Kenyans of one of Ruto’s most embarrassing moments.

    Poor Performance: Guyo’s track record of stalled projects, financial mismanagement, and administrative chaos made him indefensible.

    Local Opposition: With 89% of MCAs supporting his removal, Guyo had lost all local legitimacy. Supporting him would have appeared dictatorial.

    Strategic Calculation: Sacrificing Guyo allowed Ruto to appear respectful of democratic processes while distancing himself from a problematic ally.

    The Broader Political Lesson

    Guyo’s downfall illustrates the precarious nature of political relationships in Kenya’s transactional system. His initial betrayal of Azimio, while temporarily beneficial, established him as someone whose loyalty could be bought and sold.

    More fundamentally, it demonstrates that even presidential allies must deliver results. Poor governance, financial mismanagement, and public embarrassments will eventually outweigh political connections.

    Conclusion: A Political Orphan

    As Governor Guyo faces Senate proceedings following his impeachment, he finds himself politically orphaned. His former Azimio allies have no reason to assist someone who betrayed them, while his UDA colleagues have clearly decided he’s more liability than asset.

    The man who once boasted of secret presidential support now stands alone, a cautionary tale about the dangers of political opportunism and poor governance. His fall from grace serves as a reminder that in Kenya’s evolving political landscape, performance increasingly matters as much as connections.

    For President Ruto, dumping Guyo was a cold but necessary political calculation. In the ruthless arithmetic of power, loyalty becomes worthless when it’s accompanied by incompetence and public embarrassment. Governor Guyo learned this lesson the hard way.

    The author is a political analyst specializing in Kenyan county politics and governance issues.

  • Businesses in Mount Kenya Were Targeted By Our Own Children and Destroyed, Moses Kuria Decries

    Businesses in Mount Kenya Were Targeted By Our Own Children and Destroyed, Moses Kuria Decries

    Senior Presidential Advisor claims region bore disproportionate burden during anniversary protests that left 16 dead nationwide

    NAIROBI – President William Ruto’s Senior Economic Advisor Moses Kuria has condemned what he describes as targeted destruction of businesses and public institutions in the Mount Kenya region during Wednesday’s nationwide Gen Z memorial protests, claiming the area suffered disproportionately compared to other parts of the country.

    Sixteen people died during nationwide anti-government protests in Kenya on Wednesday, most of them killed by police, the head of Amnesty Kenya said, marking the first anniversary of the historic youth-led demonstrations that initially opposed tax increases but evolved into broader anti-government protests.

    In a detailed statement posted on his X account Thursday morning, Kuria itemized a litany of destruction across central Kenya’s commercial centers, painting a picture of systematic targeting of the economically vital region.

    “Shops around Koja and OTC were looted and vandalised. Shops in Roysambu were looted and vandalised. Nanas Mall Thika looted and vandalised,” Kuria listed in his post, which has garnered significant attention on social media.

    The destruction extended to major retail chains, with “Carrefour Ruiru looted and vandalised” and “Naivas in Nyeri looted and vandalised,” according to the government advisor’s account.

    However, the most severe damage appears to have occurred in Nyandarua County, where Kuria reported complete destruction of government infrastructure.

    “All public institutions in Ol Kalou including police stations, ID Offices, County Commissioner’s Office and County Government Offices burnt down,” he stated.

    Kuria, a former Member of Parliament and outspoken government figure, used the destruction to validate his controversial political predictions, claiming the scale of damage proved his earlier warnings about Kenya’s political trajectory.

    “Mt Kenya paid a disproportionately heavy price yesterday. Again,” he stated, the word “Again” suggesting he believes this represents a pattern of regional targeting rather than random protest violence.

    The advisor has previously made provocative statements about Kenya’s democratic future, including his prediction that there will be no competitive presidential election in 2027.

    Speaking on a local television station on June 22, Kuria declared that the 2027 contest would mirror Kenya’s historic 2002 election, which saw broad political consensus sweep Mwai Kibaki to power.

    “Let me shock you,” Kuria had said. “Some people are training for a football match that will not happen. 2027 will be like 2002. There will be no presidential election — there will be a consensus.”

    Wednesday, June 25, 2025, marked one year since Kenyans nationwide rose to reject the Finance Bill, which originally sparked the Gen Z protest movement.

    Kenyan police fired tear gas and water cannons to disperse protesters as thousands took to the streets across multiple counties.

    The protests, which began as opposition to perceived burdensome taxation on an already struggling generation, have evolved into broader demonstrations against police brutality and government corruption.

    The death of Albert Ojwang while in police custody on June 8, 2025, catalysed nationwide outrage, adding fuel to the anniversary demonstrations.

    Kenya’s urban centres witnessed a wave of Gen Z-led protests that were marked by heightened security, road closures, and a heavy police presence, though the specific targeting of Mount Kenya businesses, as described by Kuria, adds a regional dimension to the national unrest.

    The Mount Kenya region, which includes major commercial centers like Thika, Nyeri, and Ruiru, represents a significant portion of Kenya’s economic activity outside Nairobi.

    The targeting of major retail chains like Carrefour and Naivas, along with popular shopping destinations, could have substantial economic implications for the region.

    Kuria’s emphasis on the “disproportionate” impact suggests concern about potential long-term effects on business confidence and investment in the region, which has historically been considered a government stronghold.

    The Senior Presidential Advisor’s statements come at a politically sensitive time, as the government faces mounting pressure over its handling of youth protests and broader governance issues.

    His claim of regional targeting could be interpreted as an attempt to rally Mount Kenya political support around the government, or alternatively, as acknowledgment of serious security failures in the region.

    Kuria’s linking of the destruction to his prediction about the 2027 elections suggests he views current events as validation of his controversial stance that Kenya needs political consensus rather than competitive democracy to avoid chaos.

    The government has yet to issue an official response to Kuria’s specific claims about Mount Kenya targeting, though President Ruto’s administration has generally condemned violence during protests while defending security forces’ actions.

    Kuria on Wednesday morning cautioned police officers against provoking peaceful demonstrators by using tear gas canisters offensively to disperse them, showing some criticism of security force tactics even as he condemned the destruction.

     

  • Raila Calls for Peaceful Protests as Kenya Braces for Gen Z Demonstrations

    Raila Calls for Peaceful Protests as Kenya Braces for Gen Z Demonstrations

    ODM leader emphasizes constitutional rights while urging restraint ahead of Wednesday’s planned demonstrations

    MOMBASA – Opposition leader Raila Odinga has urged Kenyan youth to conduct themselves peacefully during planned nationwide protests on Wednesday, June 25, marking his first public statement on demonstrations that have generated significant national concern.

    Speaking in Mombasa on Tuesday afternoon, the ODM party leader acknowledged the constitutional right to protest while emphasizing the importance of lawful conduct during the Gen Z-led demonstrations.

    “Article 37 of the Constitution guarantees Kenyans the right to assemble, demonstrate, and present petitions to authorities,” Odinga stated. “But this does not give anyone the right to engage in lawlessness or destroy public and private property.”

    The veteran politician’s remarks represent a notable shift in tone from his previous positions on protests, where he had maintained that Kenyans do not require police permission to demonstrate.

    His Tuesday comments placed greater emphasis on organization, discipline, and adherence to legal frameworks.
    “Kenyans who are going to demonstrate tomorrow should follow the law and avoid actions that may put them at loggerheads with law enforcement officers,” Odinga cautioned, warning that violent conduct or property destruction could place demonstrators “on the wrong side of the law.”
    The planned protests have created a charged political atmosphere, with various stakeholders weighing in on the demonstrations organized by the youth-led Gen Z movement. The Catholic Bishops of Kenya issued a pastoral letter earlier Tuesday, calling on the government to listen to young people’s concerns rather than suppress them.
    “Young people deserve listening and support, not suppression,” the bishops declared, while condemning excessive force by security agencies and citing instances of harassment, abductions, and killings during previous protests.
    President William Ruto has taken a firm stance in support of law enforcement, warning against attempts to destabilize the country. Speaking at State House earlier this week, Ruto assured police of government backing in maintaining public order.
    “Without peace, without security, without stability—we don’t have a nation,” the President stated. “Anyone seeking to intimidate our security agencies is doing the wrong thing.”
    The President emphasized that security agencies have full government support to act decisively against those attempting to incite violence or engage in unlawful conduct during the demonstrations.
    As Kenya prepares for Wednesday’s protests, the contrasting messages from political leaders reflect the delicate balance between constitutional rights and public order. While Odinga’s call for peaceful demonstration aligns with constitutional provisions, his emphasis on legal compliance marks a departure from his historically more confrontational stance on protests.
    The Gen Z movement, which has mobilized youth across the country through social media platforms, has yet to respond publicly to Odinga’s Tuesday remarks. The demonstrations are expected to take place in major urban centers, with authorities preparing security measures to maintain order.
    The protests come at a time of heightened political tensions, with young Kenyans increasingly vocal about governance issues and economic challenges facing the country. How Wednesday’s demonstrations unfold will likely influence the ongoing dialogue between Kenya’s youth and political establishment.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Activist Morara Kebaso Quits Politics Weeks After Launching Manifesto

    Activist Morara Kebaso Quits Politics Weeks After Launching Manifesto

    Morara Kebaso has thrown in the towel. Just weeks after launching his political manifesto, the outspoken activist-turned-politician shocked Kenyans by announcing he had quit politics for good.

    The dramatic decision, made public through a tweet on Monday, June 23, sent ripples through his online fan base and political observers alike.

    Once hailed as the face of a rising Gen-Z revolution, Morara now says he wants to live a quiet life, free from cameras, critics, and constant media misquotes.

    Activist Morara Kebaso Quits Politics Weeks After Launching Manifesto
    Morara Kebaso has said little about what he’ll do next, aside from enjoying his newfound freedom and focusing on business. But his exit from politics has left many questions. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Morara Kebaso Gives Up Politics for Freedom and Privacy

    In a bombshell announcement, Morara Kebaso confirmed he was walking away from politics, a space he had barely occupied for a few months. In his viral X post, he wrote:

    “I’ve finally left politics. Now I can live my life, run my business, make my money, travel the world, see my friends, and visit a bar without worrying about being photographed. I’m free.”

    The post captured both frustration and relief. The former lawyer turned activist seemed fed up with the constant attacks and the pressure of public scrutiny. He hinted that the unrelenting criticism had stripped him of peace and that his move was about reclaiming his freedom.

    He went on to add:

    “Nobody can judge me for dancing the ‘wrong’ way or smiling the ‘wrong’ way. I don’t need security. I can drive myself. I no longer have to show up for TV interviews only to be misquoted.”

    For many of his supporters, the decision came as a shock. Just a few weeks earlier, Morara had unveiled his party — the Injection of National Justice, Economic and Civic Transformation (INJECT) — and promised to revolutionize Kenyan politics. He was vocal, passionate, and, at one point, seen as a rising alternative to the traditional political class.

    But behind the scenes, the pressure was mounting. According to Morara, being a public figure brought risks to his personal safety. He said that his every move was judged, misrepresented, or politicized — even his smile.

    From Anti-Finance Bill Hero to Political Burnout

    Morara Kebaso first shot into the national spotlight during the 2024 anti-Finance Bill protests. He stood out by adopting a bold approach — traveling across the country to expose stalled government projects, many of which dated back to the Uhuru Kenyatta era.

    His activism gained massive public support, with crowds funding his travels and videos of his exposés going viral online. He quickly became a symbol of youth-driven accountability and a thorn in the government’s side.

    State House eventually responded to his activism. Spokesman Hussein Mohammed addressed Morara’s claims, stating that some of the delayed projects had been re-tendered or had their contracts canceled. But by then, the public had already crowned Morara as a true voice of the people.

    His reputation as a bold reformist grew stronger when he survived an assault at the Bomas of Kenya during a public hearing on the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. Many saw it as a sign that the system was fighting back against a threat it couldn’t control.

    Cracks Begin to Show

    However, fame also brought complications. As his star rose, so did scrutiny. Reports surfaced that the government was targeting him for unpaid taxes. His habit of frequently asking for financial support on social media also raised eyebrows, with critics accusing him of exploiting his followers.

    Then came what many saw as the beginning of the end — in March 2025, Morara announced that his INJECT party had joined the opposition coalition. While some cheered the move, others felt betrayed, arguing that he was aligning with the very political class he had once opposed.

    Worse still, a photo of him with individuals linked to the Kenya Kwanza government leaked in April, igniting online speculation that he was secretly backed by the state — a “project” planted to sway public opinion.

    By June, the pressure cooker had burst. The criticism, suspicion, and constant online attacks seemed to push him over the edge. His departure may have been sudden, but for those watching closely, it had been coming.

    What’s Next for Morara Kebaso After Politics?

    Morara Kebaso has said little about what he’ll do next, aside from enjoying his newfound freedom and focusing on business. But his exit from politics has left many questions.

    Was he simply too idealistic for the dirty game of Kenyan politics? Did he underestimate the toll of public life? Or was he indeed a political puppet who bolted after being exposed?

    For now, Morara is choosing peace over power. Whether his political break is permanent or just a pause, only time will tell.

    But one thing is clear — Morara Kebaso made a mark. He showed young Kenyans that challenging the system is possible. And while his political journey may have ended, his impact is still being felt.

  • Moses Kuria Predicts There Won’t Be A Presidential Election in 2027

    Moses Kuria Predicts There Won’t Be A Presidential Election in 2027

    Senior presidential advisor declares Kenya will witness political consensus similar to historic 2002 landslide

    President William Ruto’s Senior Economic Advisor Moses Kuria has made a bold prediction that Kenya’s 2027 presidential election will not be a contested affair, but rather a moment of national political consensus similar to the historic 2002 polls that swept Mwai Kibaki to power.

    Speaking during an interview on Citizen TV on June 22, Kuria dismissed the notion of a typical presidential campaign, suggesting instead that Kenya’s political landscape is heading toward unprecedented unity among key players.

    “Let me shock you,” Kuria declared. “Some people are training for a football match that will not happen. 2027 will be like 2002.

    There will be no presidential election — there will be a consensus.”

    The 2002 presidential election marked a watershed moment in Kenyan politics when opposition parties united under the National Rainbow Coalition (NARC) to decisively defeat the long-ruling Kenya African National Union (KANU).

    Mwai Kibaki secured a commanding 62% of the vote against KANU’s Uhuru Kenyatta, who managed only 31%, ending 24 years of KANU rule.

    Kuria emphasized the overwhelming nature of that victory, asking rhetorically: “Have you ever seen that margin again?”

    He suggested that just as Kibaki had already gained acceptance among political heavyweights before the 2002 ballot, a similar pre-election consensus is emerging for 2027.

    The advisor contrasted this anticipated scenario with the closely contested elections of 2013 and 2017, arguing that current political dynamics favor consensus over confrontation.

    “There’s not going to be that kind of presidential contest,” Kuria explained.

    “Some people are training for football, but it will be a tennis match.”

    Beyond his electoral predictions, Kuria issued a stark warning about Kenya’s political future, urging leaders to prioritize national stability over personal ambitions.

    “We have two options: go out one day and destroy the nation, or let’s agree. Let there be honor among men and women,” he stated, suggesting that political consensus could prevent the country from sliding into crisis.

    The senior advisor’s comments come amid ongoing political tensions and realignments within Kenya’s political landscape, with various factions positioning themselves for the 2027 race.

    Interestingly, while predicting consensus, Kuria also reiterated his own intention to seek the presidency in 2027, claiming to have national appeal beyond his Central Kenya base.

    “I can do a rally in any part of this country without the local MP. I’m a villager in every part of the country — Garissa, Wajir, wherever,” he boasted, positioning himself as a candidate with cross-regional support.

    Kuria’s predictions have generated significant debate among political observers and the public.

    Critics argue that his consensus theory may be wishful thinking, given Kenya’s history of competitive elections and the current political divisions.

    Social media reactions have been mixed, with some viewing his statements as an attempt to discourage opposition mobilization, while others see them as genuine political analysis based on his experience in previous electoral cycles.

    The 2002 election that Kuria references was indeed unique in Kenya’s democratic history.

    The NARC coalition brought together diverse opposition forces, including Kibaki’s Democratic Party, Raila Odinga’s Liberal Democratic Party, and the National Alliance Party of Kenya, creating an unstoppable political force.

    However, that coalition eventually fragmented due to disagreements over power-sharing arrangements, raising questions about the sustainability of such broad political alliances.

    As Kenya approaches the 2027 election cycle, Kuria’s predictions add another layer of complexity to an already evolving political landscape.

    Whether his vision of consensus will materialize remains to be seen, but his statements have certainly injected new talking points into the national political discourse.

    The effectiveness of his prediction may ultimately depend on the willingness of Kenya’s political elite to prioritize national unity over individual ambitions — a challenge that has proven difficult in previous election cycles.

    Political analysts will be watching closely to see if Kuria’s consensus theory gains traction among other political leaders or if it remains an isolated perspective in Kenya’s characteristically competitive political environment.

  • Malala Blames Ouster on Push to Hold Ruto Accountable Over Unfulfilled Election Promises

    Malala Blames Ouster on Push to Hold Ruto Accountable Over Unfulfilled Election Promises

    Cleophas Malala, the former Secretary General of the ruling United Democratic Alliance (UDA), has come out guns blazing, accusing top party officials and President William Ruto of pushing him out for demanding accountability on promises made to Kenyans during the 2022 General Election campaigns.

    In a blistering exposé, Malala says he was branded a mole for compiling and tracking the government’s pledges to uplift hustlers and grow the economy from the bottom up. He now claims that his removal was a political punishment for standing by the people, not the powerful.

    Malala Blames Ouster on Push to Hold Ruto Accountable Over Unfulfilled Election Promises
    Malala’s revelations have stirred political waters, laying bare the growing cracks in Ruto’s inner circle. His remarks have also reignited debate over the unfulfilled election promises that many Kenyans say remain just words. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Malala Says He Was Ousted for Questioning Unfulfilled Election Promises

    Speaking over the weekend, Malala revealed that while serving as UDA Secretary General, he took it upon himself to compile all campaign pledges made by the president and the ruling party into one document. His goal? To track progress and ensure delivery.

    But instead of praise, he says he was met with hostility. “When I was Secretary General of UDA, I tried to bring all the matters and issues that we promised and compiled them into a single document,” Malala said. “But it became impossible for the leadership to actualise what they had promised. When we tried to raise pertinent issues, we were seen as moles.”

    Malala said he reminded the party leadership about the original UDA philosophy—uplifting the lives of those at the bottom of the economic pyramid. But that too, he claims, was seen as an act of betrayal.

    “We listed the party’s philosophy, and when we told the president that this was your guiding principle, he saw us as people who had lost faith in him,” he said. “That’s when they decided to kick me out.”

    From UDA Exit to Political Awakening

    In August 2024, Malala’s tenure as UDA Secretary General was abruptly ended during a National Executive Council meeting chaired by UDA’s National Chairperson, Cecily Mbarire.

    “The appointment of Cleophas Malala as the interim Secretary General is hereby revoked. These changes are effective immediately,” the party stated.

    Now the deputy party leader of the Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP), Malala sees his ouster not as a setback, but as a blessing.

    “I have never regretted leaving UDA,” he said. “It was a blessing in disguise. I would have sunk with the entire ship.”

    He claims that remaining silent would have meant betraying the people who trusted UDA to transform their lives. Instead, he chose principle over political survival.

    His comments reflect a growing frustration within the Kenya Kwanza coalition, with many accusing the administration of abandoning its promises, especially on issues of economic inclusion, job creation, and cost of living.

    A Dysfunctional Government and a Broken Parliament

    Beyond his criticism of UDA, Malala delivered a fiery indictment of Kenya’s current political leadership, claiming the country is in a state of total confusion.

    “We are in a messed-up country that cannot be defined or pinned down,” Malala said. “When it comes to legislation, we have the most confused parliament since independence. We do not know who is the majority, who is the minority, who is the government, and who is the opposition.”

    He blames both the presidency and Parliament for lacking direction, saying Kenyans are being misled while power games dominate national politics.

    Malala’s frustrations come barely a month after he called for the government’s dissolution. That call followed a court ruling that quashed the panel which had impeached his close ally, Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua—a ruling that rattled Kenya Kwanza’s fragile power balance.

     

  • Raila’s Strategic Appearance at Executive Retreat With Ruto Signals Deepening Role in Broad-Based Government

    Raila’s Strategic Appearance at Executive Retreat With Ruto Signals Deepening Role in Broad-Based Government

    Opposition veteran Raila Odinga’s conspicuous appearance at the final day of President William Ruto’s National Executive Retreat on Friday marked a defining moment in Kenya’s evolving political landscape, underscoring his growing executive influence within the broad-based government arrangement.

    The former Prime Minister’s presence at the KCB Leadership Centre in Karen, where he joined Cabinet Secretaries, Principal Secretaries, and top government officials, represented more than ceremonial participation—it was a calculated display of his integral role in Ruto’s administration amid mounting economic and political pressures.

    Odinga’s arrival at the retreat’s closing session drew immediate attention, with President Ruto notably addressing him as “Baba”—a term of endearment and respect that signals their deepened political partnership.

    f3cf6a08-af38-4b59-8ddb-5b87cb050cd9

    This public display of camaraderie comes as both leaders navigate criticism over their alliance, which has fundamentally altered Kenya’s political dynamics.

    The timing of Raila’s participation is particularly significant.

    While he was absent from Thursday’s opening session, his strategic appearance on the final day—when policy directives and performance targets were expected to be announced—demonstrates his position as more than an outside advisor but rather as a key stakeholder in government decision-making.

    The broad-based government arrangement emerged from political crisis, with Ruto’s popularity dwindling following protests that forced him to join forces with Odinga to stabilize his administration.

    This partnership, formalized through a cooperation agreement between the ruling United Democratic Alliance (UDA) and Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), has seen several ODM members appointed to senior government positions.

    President Ruto has consistently defended the arrangement, recently describing it as “God-sent” and emphasizing that “genuine transformation demands difficult decisions and broad political goodwill.” However, critics view it as elite accommodation rather than genuine reform.

    The retreat itself focused on Kenya’s struggling economy, soaring unemployment, and growing public frustration over issues including police brutality and lack of transparency.

    During Thursday’s session, President Ruto unveiled ambitious plans including the construction of 1,600 science laboratories in public secondary schools and mandated the use of the eCitizen platform for school fee collection to enhance transparency.

    “We cannot afford to fail Kenyans. This retreat is not a holiday, it’s a commitment to recalibrate and deliver,” Ruto declared, setting an urgent tone that made Raila’s endorsement through his presence all the more valuable.

    Despite their current collaboration, Odinga has maintained that ODM will contest the 2027 elections, stating during a recent event that “during electioneering, ODM will also contest.”

    This positions the current arrangement as temporary cooperation rather than permanent merger, adding complexity to their relationship.

    Raila’s retreat appearance serves multiple political purposes: it reinforces his relevance in national governance, validates the broad-based government concept to his supporters, and provides him with insider access to government policy-making that could benefit his party’s future electoral prospects.

    Throughout his political career, Odinga has positioned himself as a national dialogue facilitator, and his retreat participation reinforces this narrative.

    His expected closing remarks focusing on national unity, improved public service delivery, and inclusive governance align with his self-styled role as a bridge-builder in Kenya’s often polarized political environment.

    The presence of key government figures including Deputy President Kithure Kindiki, Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi, Attorney General Dorcas Oduor, and Head of Public Service Felix Koskei alongside Raila demonstrates the broad-based government’s operational reality beyond mere political rhetoric.

    Raila’s executive-level participation raises questions about the constitutional framework governing such arrangements.

    While Kenya’s constitution provides for coalition governments, the current setup operates through party agreements rather than formal constitutional mechanisms, creating ambiguity about decision-making authority and accountability structures.

    The optics of Odinga participating in what is essentially a cabinet retreat, despite holding no official government position, signals a level of integration that goes beyond traditional opposition-government cooperation.

    As President Ruto prepares to announce new policy directives and performance targets following the retreat, Raila’s endorsement through his participation provides crucial political cover.

    With the administration facing mounting pressure over economic performance and governance issues, having Kenya’s most prominent opposition figure publicly aligned with government initiatives offers valuable legitimacy.

    However, the sustainability of this arrangement remains questionable given the competing electoral ambitions of both leaders and their parties.

    Raila’s strategic appearance at the executive retreat may represent the high-water mark of the broad-based government concept, demonstrating both its potential influence and inherent limitations.

    The coming months will test whether this executive-level cooperation can translate into tangible improvements for ordinary Kenyans or whether it remains primarily an elite political accommodation designed to manage immediate crises while preserving longer-term electoral options for both leaders.

  • “You Cannot Go to Streets and Expect Police to Kiss You” – Kenyans Remind Gachagua of Past Remarks on Protest Crackdowns

    “You Cannot Go to Streets and Expect Police to Kiss You” – Kenyans Remind Gachagua of Past Remarks on Protest Crackdowns

    Former Deputy President’s current criticism of police brutality contrasts sharply with his previous support for violent suppression of demonstrations

    NAIROBI, Kenya – Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua finds himself in an uncomfortable spotlight as Kenyans resurrect his past statements defending police brutality against protesters, following his recent criticism of the government’s violent crackdown on demonstrations.

    The controversy erupted this week after Gachagua condemned the government’s handling of peaceful protesters who were demonstrating against the killing of teacher and blogger Albert Ojwang.

    In a strongly-worded statement on his X account, Gachagua described the police action as “one of the lowest moments of our post-independence Kenya.”

    However, Kenyans were quick to remind the former Deputy President of his dramatically different stance just 12 months ago, when he was still in government and actively defending similar police actions.

    The Contradiction Exposed

    (Click to watch the video)

    10ab55b756bf5e4d1f931ed066eceb15c61a00fe

    In July 2023, while serving as Deputy President under William Ruto’s administration, Gachagua had defended brutal police action against protesters with the now-infamous statement: “You cannot go to the streets destroying property and expect police to come kiss you.”

    Speaking during a tour of Murang’a County alongside President Ruto, Gachagua had urged security officers to “stay put and not be bothered by criticism from the opposition,” effectively giving police carte blanche to use force against demonstrators.

    The stark contrast between his past and present positions has not gone unnoticed by the Kenyan public, who have flooded social media with reminders of his previous statements supporting the very actions he now condemns.

    During his tenure as Deputy President, Gachagua positioned himself as President Ruto’s primary defender, taking a hardline stance against any form of dissent.

    He famously declared: “Whoever is planning something against President Ruto should be prepared to face me because that is my job. My work is to protect him.”

    His transformation from government cheerleader to fierce critic began after his impeachment in October 2024, following what he described as a betrayal by his former boss.

    Since then, Gachagua has emerged as one of the administration’s harshest critics, exposing what he calls the government’s “corruption and nepotism.”

    Recent Events Spark Fresh Criticism

    The latest controversy stems from the government’s response to protests following the death of teacher Albert Ojwang.

    During the demonstrations, a vendor named Boniface Mwangi Kariuki was shot at point-blank range by a police officer and remains hospitalized after undergoing a second surgery to remove bullet fragments.

    Gachagua’s response to this incident marked a complete reversal of his previous position: “It is uncivilized to sink our nation into an international shame by a clueless regime that has no value and dignity for human life,” he posted on social media.

    The revelation of Gachagua’s contradictory statements has sparked intense public debate about political opportunism and the authenticity of his current opposition stance.

    Many Kenyans have questioned whether his newfound concern for human rights is genuine or merely a product of his political circumstances.

    Social media users have been sharing clips and quotes from his time in government, highlighting statements where he urged police to continue their work without being “bothered by criticism from protesters and the opposition.”

    This isn’t the first time Gachagua’s past statements have come under scrutiny since his impeachment.

    His journey from being Ruto’s “main defender” to launching the Democracy for the Citizens Party (DCP) to challenge the president in 2027 has been marked by a complete ideological reversal on multiple issues.

    During his time in office, Gachagua had even defended the government’s heavy expenditure on presidential travel and maintained that President Ruto would enjoy “a smooth sail to power” in 2027, despite opposition criticism.

    The controversy goes to show a broader issue in Kenyan politics about the consistency and credibility of political leaders who dramatically shift positions based on their current circumstances.

    It also underscores the power of social media and public memory in holding politicians accountable for their past statements.

    As Gachagua continues to position himself as a champion of human rights and democratic freedoms, his past endorsement of police brutality serves as a reminder of the political calculations that often drive such transformations.

  • Details: How MPs Plot to Regulate Artificial Intelligence Usage in Kenya

    Details: How MPs Plot to Regulate Artificial Intelligence Usage in Kenya

    Kenyan lawmakers are intensifying their push for comprehensive regulation of artificial intelligence (AI) usage in the country, citing growing concerns over disinformation, privacy breaches, and potential national security threats posed by unregulated AI systems.

    At the heart of this legislative initiative is a motion by Aldai MP Marianne Kitany, who has called for the formulation of a robust regulatory framework to govern AI implementation across Kenya.

    The motion, which has gained significant traction among parliamentarians, specifically requests the government, through the Ministry of Information, Communication and the Digital Economy, to develop comprehensive regulatory guidelines and ethical standards for AI use.

    “Government, through the Ministry of Information, Communication and the Digital Economy, should formulate a regulatory framework and ethical guidelines for implementation of Artificial Intelligence in the country to control its potential misuse,” reads Kitany’s motion, which was presented to the National Assembly.

    The lawmakers’ push for regulation stems from mounting concerns about AI’s potential for misuse in a country where digital literacy is still developing.

    MPs have pointed to the proliferation of fake news and disinformation campaigns, many of which are now AI-powered, as primary reasons for urgent regulatory intervention.

    Nambale MP Geoffrey Mulanya highlighted the immediate dangers facing Kenyan society.

    “We have had cases of fake news appearing in our social media because we have young intelligent people coming up with screaming fake newspaper headlines, which causes conflict in our society,” Mulanya told the National Assembly.

    The concerns extend beyond disinformation to encompass a broader range of AI-related risks that MPs believe could destabilize the country if left unchecked.

    These include algorithmic discrimination, privacy invasion, financial market manipulation, job displacement, and the potential development of autonomous weapons systems.

    While acknowledging AI’s transformative potential across various sectors, lawmakers have emphasized the technology’s double-edged nature.

    The MPs recognize that AI has already brought significant benefits to Kenya’s healthcare, manufacturing, and robotics sectors, improving efficiency and driving innovation.

    Luanda MP Dick Maungu noted the inevitability of AI adoption in Kenya’s increasingly connected society.

    “We live in a society which is a global village. If we don’t have a regulatory framework, people are set to suffer,” Maungu warned, emphasizing the urgent need for proactive legislation.

    Bondo MP Gideon Ochanda drew parallels with previous technological adoptions, citing how Kenyans initially resisted tea-picking machines but eventually embraced them once their benefits became apparent.

    “Artificial Intelligence is a must, and if we don’t regulate it, it’s going to run ahead of us, ahead of the government, and people are going to continue using it, and they are already doing that,” Ochanda stated.

    The parliamentary motion outlines a multi-faceted approach to AI regulation that goes beyond mere restriction to include education and awareness components.

    MPs want the government to develop and execute a public awareness program on AI to increase understanding of the technology, foster transparency, and promote responsible usage.

    MP Erick Muchangi emphasized the urgency of regulatory action, pointing to AI’s growing presence in critical sectors.

    “The government must move fast and regulate AI, because it is nowadays being used in healthcare, in the education sector, so how can we not regulate it?” he questioned.

    West Mugirango MP Stephen Mogaka has called for AI to be integrated into the curriculum of technical training institutions, signaling lawmakers’ recognition that regulation must be coupled with education and skill development.

    A key concern among MPs is ensuring that AI regulation doesn’t stifle innovation while protecting employment opportunities for Kenya’s youth.

    The lawmakers have cautioned against embracing AI “100 percent,” warning that unrestricted adoption could lead to significant job losses, particularly among young people who form a substantial portion of Kenya’s workforce.

    This balanced approach reflects the MPs’ understanding that Kenya must navigate between harnessing AI’s benefits and protecting its citizens from potential negative consequences.

    The parliamentary discussions have also highlighted national security implications of unregulated AI use.

    MPs have emphasized the need for comprehensive security assessments before allowing AI systems access to critical national data, recognizing that improper AI implementation could compromise Kenya’s digital sovereignty and security infrastructure.

    The push for regulation comes as Kenya seeks to improve its position in global AI adoption rankings.

    According to the 2022 Government Artificial Intelligence Readiness Index report, Kenya ranked fifth in Africa and 90th globally in AI adoption readiness.

    The Oxford Insights Survey 2022 placed Kenya’s AI readiness at 40.3 percent, indicating significant room for improvement.

    The Ministry of Information, Communication and the Digital Economy has been working on Kenya’s National AI Strategy 2025-2030, which aims to position the country as Africa’s leading AI hub.

    The Kenyan Ministry of Information, Communications, and the Digital Economy has released a draft National AI Strategy for public validation.

    The State Department for Parliamentary Affairs has reaffirmed its commitment to coordinating the legislative agenda that will anchor Kenya’s National AI Strategy 2025–2030 in law, ensuring a strong regulatory framework for artificial intelligence adoption.

    Currently, there are currently no specific laws or regulations in Kenya that directly regulate AI, making the MPs’ push for comprehensive legislation particularly timely.

    The Kenya AI Strategy 2025–2030 positions itself as one of the most structured and forward-looking national frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa to date, suggesting that Kenya’s regulatory framework could serve as a model for other African nations grappling with similar AI governance challenges.

    The parliamentary motion represents a critical step in Kenya’s journey toward responsible AI adoption, balancing the need for innovation with the imperative to protect citizens from potential AI-related harms.

    As the debate continues in the National Assembly, the outcome could significantly influence how Kenya navigates the complex landscape of AI governance in the coming years.

    The MPs’ initiative reflects a growing global trend toward AI regulation, with Kenya positioning itself to be among the first African nations to establish comprehensive AI governance frameworks. The success of this legislative effort could determine whether Kenya achieves its ambition of becoming a regional AI leader while maintaining the safety and security of its digital ecosystem.

  • Scandal-Hit WRA Boss Mohammed Shurie Plots Comeback as Garissa Governor

    Scandal-Hit WRA Boss Mohammed Shurie Plots Comeback as Garissa Governor

    Garissa County is staring at a political bombshell as embattled former Water Resources Authority (WRA) chief executive Mohammed Shurie throws his hat into the gubernatorial ring—despite a trail of scandal, unanswered questions, and whispers of grand corruption that defined his time in public service.

    Shurie, who announced his bid with a promise to make Garissa “a Silicon Valley of service delivery,” is no stranger to controversy.

    His tenure at both the Garissa Water Services Board and later at WRA was marred by allegations of corruption, nepotism, abuse of office, and manipulation of public contracts—allegations that, though never prosecuted, continue to haunt his reputation.

    Insiders at WRA recall a regime where Shurie ruled with an iron fist, turning the agency into what some have called a “private empire.”

    Procurement processes were allegedly weaponized to benefit close associates and shell companies linked to allies from his clan. Multiple internal audits—some buried quietly—flagged irregular spending, dubious contractor payments, and ghost water projects particularly in Northern Kenya.

    A senior water engineer who served under Shurie at the Garissa Water Services Board spoke on condition of anonymity:

    “There were entire projects budgeted for and ‘completed’ on paper, yet not a single borehole existed on the ground. Millions evaporated, just like the water we were supposed to deliver.”

    Despite repeated warnings from the Auditor-General’s office, no significant reforms were enacted under Shurie’s leadership. Instead, whistleblowers were reportedly intimidated, transferred, or silenced altogether.

    Shurie’s sudden political ambition, according to observers, is less about serving the public and more about leveraging his Ogaden clan’s numbers to whitewash his tainted record.

    His entry into the race has sent shockwaves across Garissa’s political class, with rivals accusing him of attempting to “launder his past through the ballot box.”

    “The panic isn’t because he’s popular,” said one local politician. “It’s because he’s dangerous—politically connected, financially loaded from questionable deals, and unafraid to bulldoze his way to power.”

    Investigations by this reporter reveal that between 2017 and 2022, Shurie’s WRA presided over projects worth more than KSh 8 billion—many of which remain unaccounted for.

    An EU-funded water rehabilitation program in North Eastern Kenya was flagged for irregular tender awards, with some contracts going to companies reportedly owned by Shurie’s relatives.

    Yet no arrests were ever made. Sources in the EACC say inquiries into his dealings were quietly dropped due to “political pressure from above.”

    Now, with no formal charges against him, Shurie is repackaging himself as a development-focused “technocrat”—a dangerous narrative, critics argue, given his past.

    “Garissa does not need another looter-in-chief. It needs healing, clean leadership, and service—not PR and Silicon Valley fantasies,” said a civil society leader based in Garissa town.

    Despite the criticism, Shurie’s campaign machinery is already in motion, oiled by vast funds and influential backers—some believed to have benefited from past water deals.

    As Garissa approaches the 2027 election, voters face a chilling question: will they fall for flashy promises and clan calculations, or demand accountability for a man whose hands, many believe, are soaked in scandal?

    The ghosts of Kenya’s failed water sector may yet find new life in Garissa’s County Hall.

    The question is—will the people let it happen?

  • We Are in Government, We Will Not Join Your Useless Protests, MP Kaluma Says Ahead of Gen-Z June 25 Memorial March

    We Are in Government, We Will Not Join Your Useless Protests, MP Kaluma Says Ahead of Gen-Z June 25 Memorial March

    Homa Bay Town MP Peter Kaluma has publicly distanced himself and his community from the planned Gen Z memorial protests scheduled for June 25, 2025, labeling them as “useless” and unproductive.

    In a fiery statement posted on his official X account on Thursday, June 19, 2025, Kaluma emphasized that his constituents, having long been at the forefront of political activism, are now focused on nation-building and governance rather than street demonstrations.

    Kaluma’s remarks come amid heightened tensions following deadly protests in Nairobi on June 17, 2025, sparked by the death of digital content creator Albert Ojwang while in police custody.

    The demonstrations, which began peacefully, turned violent, with reports of looting, clashes with police, and the widely condemned shooting of an unarmed hawker by officers.

    The upcoming Gen Z memorial protests aim to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the 2024 Finance Bill protests, during which over 60 people lost their lives and Parliament was stormed, ultimately forcing the government to withdraw the controversial bill.

    In his X post, Kaluma declared, “Our people will not join you in your useless street protests. We have been on the streets, dying for you, since independence. We are in government, busy rebuilding after years of neglect.”

    The MP, a vocal supporter of the government following the Orange Democratic Movement’s (ODM) alliance with President William Ruto, expressed frustration over what he perceives as the exploitation of his community in past political struggles.

    He argued that their decades-long participation in protests has come at a significant cost, and they are now prioritizing governance and development.

    Kaluma also took aim at opposition leaders, accusing them of manipulating youth to participate in protests for personal gain while shielding their own families.

    In a prior post, he warned young Kenyans against being used as “pawns” by opposition figures, alleging that some leaders exploit public unrest to secure donor funding.

    “The visionless opposition leaders are inciting other people’s children to head to the streets as they remain behind sharing out donor funding,” Kaluma stated, citing activist Boniface Mwangi as an example of those who allegedly benefit financially from protests without taking personal risks.

    A screenshot of Kaluma’s X Post.
    A screenshot of Kaluma’s X Post.

    The MP’s comments have drawn attention to the silence of ODM leader Raila Odinga, who has remained notably quiet on governance issues since his party joined forces with Ruto’s administration.

    Critics argue that this alliance has softened ODM’s stance on public dissent, with Kaluma’s remarks reflecting a broader shift within the party.

    Meanwhile, preparations for the June 25 memorial protests are underway, with Nairobi Regional Police Commander George Seda confirming that authorities have received formal notification of the planned demonstrations.

    Speaking to the media on June 18, 2025, Seda assured the public of adequate security measures to ensure safety for both protesters and non-participants. “We will provide enough security to ensure every person who is going to participate, and even those who are not participating, is safe,” he said.

    However, he urged demonstrators to maintain peace and avoid disrupting businesses, noting that past protests had turned violent due to provocations.

    Kaluma’s dismissal of the protests has sparked mixed reactions. While some view his stance as a pragmatic call for stability, others see it as a betrayal of the youth-led movement demanding accountability and justice.

  • Former Chief Justice Maraga Officially Declares 2027 Presidential Bid

    Former Chief Justice Maraga Officially Declares 2027 Presidential Bid

    Veteran jurist cites youth mistreatment and governance failures as motivation for entering race against President Ruto

    NAIROBI, Kenya – Former Chief Justice David Maraga has officially announced his candidacy for Kenya’s 2027 presidential election, marking a significant entry into what is expected to be a fiercely contested race against incumbent President William Ruto.

    Speaking during a television interview on Wednesday evening, the 74-year-old retired jurist said his decision came after extensive consultations and deep reflection on the country’s current trajectory, particularly the government’s handling of youth-led protests.

    “This has come as a result of what has happened in the country. You are a parent, and many others are also parents; to see the young people being handled the way they have been handled is something that is extremely worrying,” Maraga declared during the interview.

    Maraga’s announcement comes amid growing public dissatisfaction with President Ruto’s administration and follows sustained pressure from various quarters, including former Law Society of Kenya President Nelson Havi and other prominent voices, urging him to enter the presidential race.

    The former Chief Justice specifically referenced the treatment of young protesters and the broader culture of impunity that he argues has taken root in Kenya.

    His announcement coincided with renewed calls for constitutional restoration ahead of the first anniversary of Rex Masai’s death – a 24-year-old protester who was fatally shot during anti-government demonstrations on June 20, 2024.

    “We can’t let some people literally throw our country to the dogs. We need to think about that seriously, and it is as a result of that reflection that I have made up my mind that I will run in 2027 for the presidency of this country,” Maraga stated.

    A Professional Governance Vision

    Central to Maraga’s campaign platform is a promise to establish what he terms “professional governance” – a system where qualified experts would lead government departments without political interference.

    “This country requires many people. What I can place before Kenyans is that I am going to get a team of professionals in various areas. I will not purport to know what is done in the medical field; I will leave that to experts,” he explained.

    The former Chief Justice criticized the current administration for what he described as excessive interference with government institutions, particularly in recruitment processes. He pledged to provide necessary leadership while allowing professionals the autonomy to execute their mandates effectively.

    Youth-Centric Approach

    Recognizing that approximately 80% of Kenya’s population is under 40 years old, Maraga has made youth empowerment a cornerstone of his political message. He promised to create pathways for young people to assume leadership roles, ensuring continuity when older leaders step aside.

    This youth-focused approach appears to be resonating with Kenya’s Generation Z, who have been increasingly vocal in their demands for better governance and accountability from political leaders.

    From Judiciary to Activism

    Maraga’s transition from the judiciary to active politics has been gradual but increasingly visible. Since retiring as Chief Justice in January 2021, he has emerged as a prominent activist, particularly in matters concerning human rights and police accountability.

    Earlier this week, he demanded the arrest of key security officials, including National Police Service Inspector General Douglas Kanja and his deputy Eliud Lagat, over their alleged involvement in the death of Albert Ojwang, who died in police custody on June 7, 2025.

    “There is prima facie evidence that Eliud Lagat directly or indirectly, by himself or through his accomplices, is implicated in the illegal arrest, torture, strangulation, and eventual murder of the late Albert Ojwang,” Maraga stated during a press briefing.

    A Distinguished Legal Career

    (Left – Right) Hon Lady Justice Njoki S. Ndungu, Hon. Justice (Prof.) Jackton Boma Ojwang, Hon. Lady Justice Philomena Mbete Mwilu (Deputy Chief Justice), Hon. Justice David K. Maraga (Chief Justice), Hon. Justice Mohammed K. Ibrahim, Hon. Justice Dr Smokin C. Wanjala and Hon Justice Isaac Lenaola. August 26, 2017.

    Maraga brings significant credentials to the political arena. Born on January 12, 1951, in present-day Nyamira County, he served as Kenya’s 14th Chief Justice from October 2016 until his retirement in January 2021.

    He gained international recognition for his bold decision to annul the 2017 presidential election, citing irregularities and failures in the electoral process. The Supreme Court’s ruling, which Maraga led, forced a repeat election and demonstrated the independence of Kenya’s judiciary under his leadership.

    Maraga’s entry into the presidential race adds another dimension to what is shaping up to be a competitive election.

    President Ruto, who won the 2022 election, is expected to seek re-election, though his administration has faced criticism over economic policies and governance issues.

    Other potential candidates include former Interior Minister Fred Matiang’i, who announced his presidential bid in May 2025 after returning from the United States, according to recent reports.

    Constitutional Restoration Call

    Beyond his presidential ambitions, Maraga has called for a fundamental reset of Kenya’s governance system. He advocates for the restoration of constitutionalism and the rule of law, emphasizing that institutions must function as originally envisioned in the 2010 Constitution.

    “We need to seriously think about resetting our country; we need to reset our country back to constitutionalism, where everybody has to obey the law. We need to reset our country back to the rule of law and have things work the way they have been provided in the constitution,” he emphasized.

    As Kenya approaches the 2027 elections, Maraga’s candidacy represents a significant shift in the political landscape. His reputation for integrity, combined with his legal expertise and recent activism, positions him as a potentially formidable challenger to the incumbent.

    The coming months will reveal whether his message of professional governance and constitutional restoration resonates with Kenyan voters who have increasingly demanded accountability from their leaders.

    For now, Maraga’s declaration marks the beginning of what promises to be an intense campaign period, with the former Chief Justice positioning himself as the candidate of change and constitutional order in a country grappling with questions about its democratic trajectory.

     

  • Ruto Says Working With Raila is God-Sent

    Ruto Says Working With Raila is God-Sent

    President William Ruto has described his political alliance with ODM leader Raila Odinga as divinely ordained, emphasizing that their broad-based government arrangement transcends personal political ambitions.

    Speaking to a delegation from Kisumu County at State House on Wednesday, Ruto sought to reinforce the partnership that has faced mounting pressure from within ODM ranks over recent security concerns.

    “The broad-based government is neither a creation of Baba nor myself. It is God-sent,” Ruto told the delegation led by Kisumu Governor Anyang Nyong’o.

    President Ruto with Luo political leaders after a meeting at the State House, Nairobi.
    President Ruto with Luo political leaders after a meeting at the State House, Nairobi.

    “I say that because it is what is necessary for us to have the political goodwill to be able to push the development agenda of our nation.”

    The President’s remarks come at a critical juncture for the coalition, as some ODM politicians have called for withdrawing from the arrangement following recent incidents of alleged police brutality and extrajudicial killings. The partnership has been particularly strained after the death of Albert Ojwang in police custody, which prompted ODM Secretary-General Edwin Sifuna to declare the memorandum of understanding between the parties effectively void.

    Despite these challenges, Ruto remained adamant about the government’s inclusive approach. “No Kenyan, region, community or religion is going to be left behind. We are going to move together,” he assured the Kisumu delegation, which included local MPs, county assembly members, professionals, and elders.

    The President highlighted concrete benefits of the political cooperation, particularly for the Lake Victoria region.

    He pointed to the development of blue economy resources and the Kabonyo Fisheries and Aquaculture Centre, which is expected to produce between 25 million and 30 million fingerlings annually.

    “Our development of blue economy resources is bearing fruit and improving the incomes of fisherfolk not only in Kisumu, but across the Lake Victoria region,” Ruto said, emphasizing that inclusive development was powering the country’s progress across all sectors.

    The timing of Ruto’s appeal appears strategic, as the broad-based government faces its most serious test since its formation.

    The President’s invocation of divine intervention suggests recognition of the political delicacy surrounding the partnership, particularly as public pressure mounts over security operations targeting protesters.

    The alliance between Ruto and Raila, once bitter political rivals, has been seen as crucial for national stability and development.

    However, recent events have exposed the fragility of the arrangement, with some ODM members questioning whether the partnership can survive ongoing controversies over human rights concerns.

  • Sakaja Breaks Silence on Nairobi Chaos, Denies Sponsoring Goons in CBD Attacks

    Sakaja Breaks Silence on Nairobi Chaos, Denies Sponsoring Goons in CBD Attacks

    Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja has come out strongly to deny claims that he sponsored the goons who caused chaos in Nairobi’s Central Business District (CBD) during Tuesday’s protests.

    His denial follows a wave of backlash and accusations from political rivals and the public after armed men, some seen cooperating with police, attacked protesters and looted businesses.

    Sakaja has urged the National Police Service to arrest those responsible and end the cycle of impunity. But questions linger, and public confidence continues to erode.

    Sakaja Breaks Silence on Nairobi Chaos, Denies Sponsoring Goons in CBD Attacks
    The Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) is now under pressure to investigate the role of police in both allowing and cooperating with suspected criminals. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Sakaja Sponsoring Goons Allegations Spark Political Storm

    Governor Sakaja is in the eye of a political storm after a group of armed individuals terrorised protesters and civilians in the CBD during demonstrations on Tuesday, June 17. The attacks left many injured and several businesses counting losses after looting and vandalism.

    The governor has disassociated himself from the violent gangs and condemned the acts as criminal and unacceptable.

    “We categorically dissociate ourselves from any gangs, militias, or politically sponsored groups that exploit demonstrations to engage in criminal activity,” Sakaja said in a statement issued Wednesday.

    He insisted that the goons were not from Nairobi and that he had no connection to their actions. “We strongly condemn the destruction of public and private property witnessed last week, perpetrated by hired goons brought in from outside Nairobi,” Sakaja added.

    However, his statement did little to quell the uproar, as social media exploded with videos showing the alleged goons chanting his name and passing near his office while declaring, “We protected the city, Skaja.”

    Babu Owino Accuses Sakaja of Orchestrating Chaos

    Embakasi East MP Babu Owino led the charge in directly linking Sakaja to the mayhem. In a fiery response, Owino said the acts of violence in the capital were not random, but instead an organised scheme involving top officials.

    “Johnson Sakaja, your actions did not make you strong. Hurting others does not give you power; it only reveals your utter disregard for the rule of law,” Owino remarked in a scathing attack.

    He claimed the violence was carried out under the guise of quelling protests, yet the real mission was to instil fear and suppress dissent.

    Online platforms quickly picked up on a video of armed men riding motorbikes into town while shouting that protests would not happen. Some of the same individuals were later seen assaulting civilians, stealing handbags, phones, and other valuables.

    The timing and coordination of the goons, along with their alleged cooperation with anti-riot police, has raised serious concerns about whether the attacks were sanctioned from within government circles.

    Owino’s accusations have intensified calls for an independent probe into the events, with Kenyans demanding answers from both county and national leadership.

    Sakaja Calls for Swift Police Action as Public Demands Accountability

    In a bid to contain the fallout, Governor Sakaja has turned to the police, urging the National Police Service to act swiftly.

    “This is critical, not only to deliver justice to those affected, but also to prevent further escalation, especially by citizens feeling compelled to take the law into their own hands,” Sakaja said.

    He called on security agencies to identify, arrest, and prosecute all those responsible for the acts of violence, vandalism, and theft witnessed during the protests.

    Despite his efforts to distance himself from the attackers, many are not convinced. The public is demanding transparency and justice, especially after it appeared that some goons were working side-by-side with police officers instead of being stopped.

    Civil society groups have also weighed in, saying Kenya is walking a dangerous path if political leaders are allowed to deploy or protect gangs during times of unrest.

    The Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) is now under pressure to investigate the role of police in both allowing and cooperating with suspected criminals.

    The Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) and other watchdogs have warned that failure to act will further erode public trust in government institutions and law enforcement.