Category: Development

  • Another One: Inside Urithi Housing Qweto Gardens Scam

    Another One: Inside Urithi Housing Qweto Gardens Scam

    Mr Samuel Maina is the Chairman at Urithi Housing Cooperative Society. PHOTO| COURTESY

    After Panorama Gardens scandal, property dubbed tola 3 and tola 4 behind Mangu High School scandal, OTG project in Joska area Machakos County scam amongst many other scam projects and now Kenya Insights can reveal yet another fraud scheme, the Qweto Gardens in Malindi.

    Panorama Gardens was marketed and sold by Urithi as ready plots for immediate development and attracted 400 investors, with an eighth of an acre going for Sh2.25 million. The investors claimed they cannot develop the property because most of them have never been issued with title deeds while some are only in possession of ownership certificates or agreements they entered with Urithi.

    Ms Jane Wachira bought two undeveloped plots measuring 40×80 in 2016 for Sh2.4 million at Tola 4. Her biggest predicament is that she cannot develop the land even after completing paying for the property and despite being in possession of an ownership certificate issued to her by Urithi.

    “I bought this property at Tola 4 in 2016 and completed paying for it in 2017. We did not know there was a problem until this year when the landowner who sold the property to Urithi dug a trench and brought down the beacon and marked the property for demolition,’’ said Ms Wachira.

    Ms Mercy Kamau also bought a plot at Tola 3 in 2016 measuring 40/80 at Sh925,000 from Urithi. She was issued with an ownership certificate with a promise of getting a title deed within three to four months. It never happened.

    In April 2017, she started constructing a five bedroom maisonette. In 2018, the landowner who had sold the land to Urithi stopped the development.

    All these scams have been marked by one common feature; no issuence of title deeds which is always available in under 12 months but in these cases, some investors have had to wait for over 5 years and still no good news.

    QWETO Gardens Scam

    At the backdrop of accusations that Urithi has been delaying issuance of tittle deeds which they’ve dismissed as falsehoods, their troubles see to take a steady flow and we as Kenya insights have been able to backup the accusations with authentic evidence from the victims of their scam projects.

    “In 2017 I saw the advert for Qweto gardens in the news and decided to pay for the 1 acre plot.paid 100k plus 14k registration to the urithi sacco. As time went on was told that soon titles would be issued but no amount of calls got feedback.2019 went to office in town to find out.Was asked to pay 25k for title and leave copies of documents i.d pin etc. Followed up later in the year but no progress.”

    Below is a conversation obtained exclusively by Kenya Insights among Qweto Gardens Investors with Urithi Cooperation representatives raising alarm.

    4/07/2017, 11:29 – +254 721 created group “QWETO INVESTORS”

    28/03/2020, 13:38 – +254 721: To serve you better kindly reach us through 0795362120/0110087934/0110087935. Or http://feedback.urithihousing.co.ke/index.html
OFFICES OPEN 9:30AM to 03:30PM.
28/03/2020, 13:39 – +254 721 :Sms from Urithi today

    28/03/2020, 13:42 – +254 700: I have seen it too

    28/03/2020, 13:58 – +254 718 : Received it too.
    Wanashidwa kujibu maswali ya hapa ukuwapogia ndio watajibu…
    Playing with people’s mind.

    28/03/2020, 19:32 – +254 707 : we need this
    9/03/2020, 10:19 – +254 727: Such people should have thr assets frozen and be imprisoned forever

    31/03/2020, 17:47 – +254 722 : On top of stealing our money we got no dividend s last two years

    31/03/2020, 18:33 – +254 707: ?‍♀?‍♀?‍♀?‍♀?‍♀?‍♀?‍♀ to bad our dividends are swallowed by this…..

    02/04/2020, 02:39 – +974 50: So Urithi gon pretend like this corona thing is not going to pass.

    02/04/2020, 19:45 – +254 702: Cooperative to auction loan defaulter’s houses – https://www.pd.co.ke/business/personal-finance/cooperative-to-auction-loan-defaulters-houses-31158/

    02/04/2020, 19:51 – +254 20: MEMBER COMMUNIQUE – RELOCATION FINAL.pdf (file attached)
MEMBER COMMUNIQUE – RELOCATION FINAL.pdf

    02/04/2020, 21:00 – +254 723: This is nonsense having stolen our money why are telling us about your relocation???

    02/04/2020, 21:22 – +254 722: Which money was stolen from you.Please watch your statements.

    02/04/2020, 21:25 – +254 722: Mr. Sammy can you give us the land n stop this cat n mouse games of yours . Services not rendered is money stolen from us.

    02/04/2020, 21:28 – +974 50: I concur

    02/04/2020, 21:28 – +254 722: It is fair to allow us finish the work we promised to do.Name calling and unguarded name calling wont solve the issue.

    02/04/2020, 21:29 – +974 50: What will?

    02/04/2020, 21:30 – +254 722: We ask questions here you have no courtesy to answer them what do you take people for ?

    02/04/2020, 21:49 – +254 723: I wish you would be this quick to respond to questions we ask and to give us our land even without titles. Is this is the only way to get a response from you when someone attacks?

    02/04/2020, 21:55 – +254 723: I wish you’d be as responsive to the member concerns and not only quick to respond to attacks. You cannot blame people for not trusting you.

    02/04/2020, 21:55 – +254 723: Very true

    02/04/2020, 21:56 – +254 718: Exactly.

    02/04/2020, 21:56 – +254 723: And that’s what irks us

    02/04/2020, 22:11 – +254 723: I have never received my dividend and you dare ask me which money has been stolen from me????

    02/04/2020, 23:46 -254722 could you kindly respond to this questions I asked on 23rd March?

    02/04/2020, 23:50 – +254 748: Couldn’t agree more with you my fellow investors. Weeks later, we are still waiting for Mr. Sammy to respond to our key questions that have been posted here many times without being addressed or acknowledged. We have said many times that timely & transparent communication is the key, but wapi. It is like talking to the wall while we wait for the titles in “April”. How about all the other questions. Waaahhh! Tumechoka being ignored. ????‍♀️??‍♀️

    02/04/2020, 23:54 – : Am in the assumption that the chairman is not the one who responds to the group directly ???? I have a feeling it must be his PA….just my observation and thoughts ?

    03/04/2020, 01:14 – +254 748: It doesn’t matter to me who responds as long as they represent Urithi, they are responsive, & the information is credible.

    03/04/2020, 09:47 – +254 721: Ni yeye. All over sudden aliienda mute & will only attack when it’s convenient to him

    03/04/2020, 09:50 – +254 721 : It doesn’t matter whether it is chairman or PA. An office is represented here and they should be quick to answer our our questions like they respond to the attacks.

    03/04/2020, 09:50 – +254 721: Our patience is running out

    03/04/2020, 09:50 – +254 721: Our patience is running out

    14/04/2020, 20:59 – +254 722: Hello investors. We Soo quite here. What action are we thinking so far ? We need to hire lawyers to get the land or monies back.

    14/04/2020, 21:48 – : I asked this question on 23rd March and upto now the same has never been answered by Urithi.Its unfortunate that they are taking advantage of the current situation at hand (The Pandemic) and going silent on us.

    14/04/2020, 21:52 – : I support we take a legal action because it’s evident that if Corona continues we will never get our land or the money back since their silence justifies this…..

    14/04/2020, 21:59 – Kimutai Urithi: Good evening,
Beaconing is not yet completed. I will communicate once they are done.
I’m working on the new agreements. They will be ready by this Friday. Each member will be contacted on how they want theirs dispatched

    14/04/2020, 21:59 – Kimutai Urithi: Thank you

    14/04/2020, 22:01 – : Thank you Kimutai for the feedback much appreciated.When do you anticipate the beaconing to be finished?

    14/04/2020, 22:04 – Kimutai Urithi: I’m not able to give the timelines now, ground works are a bit complicated given the vegetation.
Kindly allow me to respond to that tomorrow

    14/04/2020, 22:09 – +254 720 : Thanks for this and good to see there is progress. Of course there is a contract between you and whoever is doing the beaconing and am sure there is a deliver by date.
14/04/2020, 22:18 – +254 721 735205: Kimutai,

    That’s great gesture.
Kindly give us updates as you promised

    17/04/2020, 17:03 – +254 718 : Any response

    17/04/2020, 18:11 – Kimutai Urithi: I will shortly

    17/04/2020, 18:14 – +254 722 : Waiting for this@ Kimutai

    03/05/2020, 10:51 – +254 721: This agreement doesn’t acknowledge that payment was made years back and is drafted as though we’re entering a new agreement in 2020. We have also paid for Title fee which is not acknowledged in any way. As drafted URITHI can still demand for more costs to be paid by the purchaser. In any case the agreement provides a lot of protections for URITHI but non for the purchaser is URITHI failed to deliver within agreed timeframe. Finally we were shown the land we purchased but now though the agreement says we have seen the property on sale the truth is that we have not which could lead to been eventually taken to completely unacceptable areas for the purchase price paid.

    “We are again on the same cycle, a few people getting documents & majority are yet to receive the agreement,why do Uriithi keeps on repeating the same thing @ Kimutai,if the sales agreements are ready why don’t you set a day or two & send to everyone ?,I can bet this will be the discussion for the whole Month, guys confirming, others complaining, others sending emails,mwaka itaiisha with back & forth. Which criteria are you using to issue sales agreements,personally am yet to receive yet I was among the first people to pay kes. 25,000 for the title.”

    “So true.how can urithi send me an agreement to sign in 2020 for something I paid for fully in 2017 .what happens to those who have paid fully ,as conditions in this said agreement are null and void as you urithi have had my funds interest free for that 3 last years.so it follows that you should provide my title and stop this game of thrones.Will assign a lawyer plus land expert plus provincial administration plus powers that be to look at this behaviour.”

    “If we were to do a count, maybe only 5 people were sent the agreement. But since we don’t have visibility, everyone thinks they are the only one who hasn’t received. In the spirit of transparency, I challenge Kimutai and his team to list for us the members they’ve sent the agreements (either by name or member number). It’s very wrong for us to start another year of back and forth on agreements. Since you have the information on whose already paid in full, I expect to see this reflected in this updated agreement.
    On another note, is another full agreement necessary, or will a simple annex or addendum work, to basically update those aspects that need to be updated?”

    ”Sale agreement is a must for a title we agree but it needs to reflect payment date of purchase plus receipt etc.for one to move forward.”
    “Huu ni mchezo wa paka na panya. Let them refund our money plus interest if they can’t deliver. They have to make reference to monies already paid and not and should stop assuming us.”

    “urithi is not a serious organisation, this cycle has lasted the last 4years.”
    “Now you can see what I’ve always been telling you. Kimutai is just but buying time, nothing more”

    “Remember it’s the same kimutai who was assigned duty of the last visit, remember where he took us?”

    “he took us to Boni forest”
    “It’s the high time we stopped being wasted”
    “My concerns before my lawyer’s review are as follow. Urithi please address this & stop the runaround & delays.

    New agreement doesn’t acknowledge original agreement & signed dates or state this is an addendum to an existing agreement
.

    Pg 2 & other sections – My purchase price is higher than the advertised price & what I paid, which concerns me that I will be expected to top up the difference if this ever came to question even though they acknowledge receiving the purchase price

    Pg 2 C – states offered & accepted plot #xx, I personally have never laid my eyes on so signing means I take whatever am given
pg 3 Section 1.2 under completion date – certificate of ownership reference is not true coz some of us completed payment in 2017 & still do not have any certificate

    pg 3 Section 3.2 states you inspected the property & it is sold in the present state & condition, which I have not inspected despite asking to see this new place on multiple occasions

    Section 6 – I assume those who already provided transfer forms & documents will not have to redo this.

    Section 8 termination of agreement – lots about what happens when the purchaser defaults but nothing addressing vendor default. This includes loss of 10% (fine), sharing the loss if sold at a lesser price but vendor keeps all the profits if sold for a higher price (8.4 ??)
    The terms in general favor the vendor & YOU the purchaser gets the short end of the stick. Bottom line in my perspective we need to see the actual property & our allocated property to sign this off.”

     

    ****************

    The conmanship and bursting bubbles in Urithi Housing Cooperation is getting out of control. With their knowledge, their target clients have now shifted to those in Diaspora.

    You buy what you’ll never see and if you see you’ll never own it.

    It is not the first time Urithi’s clients are crying foul and it’s not the first time Uriithi Cooperation is being exposed. And this shows crystal clear that it has become their norm. “Ukiona mwenzako akinyolewa, chako tia maji”

    Risks Of Off-Plan Housing Schemes.

    Many off-plan housing schemes have been launched in Kenya’s property market in the past, only to fold a few months later with investors’ deposits.

    A spot-check on social media sites, the marketplace for such housing schemes, reveals a number of companies running various ‘affordable’ and ‘pocket-friendly’ off-plan housing schemes.

    The allure of investing in off-plan developments is sweet as the prices of property are much lower than the market rates.

    Off-plan investment refers to the purchase of property before completion, generally driven by the high price of real estate and the time taken to deliver housing units. The buyer buys the property off the plan or design stage in the development, and pays for it in instalments.

    In early 2015, Ms Roseteller Okubo and her husband Yufnalis Okubo, both directors of Malcedian Properties Ltd, spotted an advert on off-plan housing schemes in a local daily, and they could not resist the lucrative prospectus. Dinara Properties Ltd had advertised their Mazuri Side I apartments, with two bedrooms going for Sh2.7 million each, off-plan.

    Mrs Okubo took it upon herself to conduct due diligence. She first visited the site of the project in Thika town and then selected two of the houses on off-plan through the aid of a salesman, Mr Joe Gichuki, who was among the sales people working for the company back then.

    “I personally visited the project site called Mazuri Side I in Thika near Ananas Mall. It was initially going for Sh1.5 million off-plan. But when I went to enquire, I was informed by Mr Gichuki that it had been sold out. But he also explained that one of the then two Dinara Properties Ltd directors; Mr Wachira Muguku had his three apartments within the project and he was willing to sell each at Sh2.7 million,” says Ms Okubo.

    “Ten of the 168 units had been set aside by the two directors as personal houses, which they could dispose of at own will,” says Mr Gichuki. His statement is confirmed by Mr Muguku, who says that together with Mr Andrew Kamau, they in 2015 agreed to set aside entire floor of six two-bedroom houses — each three — that they could sell or retain individually. They later added two more such that each owned five two-bedroom units.

    Buying a house off-plan also allows for
    Buying a house off-plan also allows for flexible payment plans as all one needs is a deposit. PHOTO| FOTOSEARCH

    With this information, Ms Okubo proceeded to the offices of Dinara Properties Ltd in Westlands, where she met both Mr Kamau and Mr Muguku. “I was convinced that they were genuine. After paying Sh2.8 million for the first unit by end of May 2015, I requested for the second unit and Mr Muguku agreed. I started paying Mr Muguku another Sh2.7 million from July 2015 to January 2016,” she says.

    Mr Muguku explains they had each set aside their five houses so as not to run down their then young company. “We were collecting customer deposits through the sales people, and because we were new and had some financial challenges, we decided that both of us could own those houses individually so that we could dispose them of at will. This way, we avoided getting any money from the company for own use or touching the deposits fund,” explains Mr Muguku.

    Each of the directors was to use their individual accounts because the houses were directly-owned, says Mr Muguku. “That is why this client, just like the other three, paid to my personal bank account. Mr Kamau too, sold his and the money was paid to him directly, and not Dinara Properties Ltd,” says Mr Muguku.

    Even after Mrs Okubo had settled all the payments in early 2016, a communication breakdown arose in early 2017. “Mr Muguku refused to pick my calls and after many unanswered calls, I looked for the salesman — Mr Gichuki — who had introduced me to Dinara. He gave me Mr Muguku’s alternative number and when I called, he picked up and gave me so many excuses. This was in March 2017,” she says.

    Further, Mr Muguku informed her that he had separated with Mr Kamau. Mr Muguku confirms that he is no longer a director of Dinara Properties Limited. “In December 2016, I moved to my own company, Tehilah Holdings Ltd. I relinquished my control of the company accounts, although I still maintained my shareholding until October 2016,” says Mr Muguku.

    He adds that he has maintained communication with Dinara Properties to follow up on his clients. On the other hand, the salesman points an accusing finger to Mr Kamau. “After a while, Mr Kamau started saying he did not know how the houses were sold, yet he was in the office when the documents were signed.”

    Mrs Okubo notes that around May 2017, Mr Muguku assured her she would still get her two apartments since he had acknowledged with Dinara that she paid for the two flats. “Several weeks later, he advised that I go to Dinara and give them my full details so that I could be given my flats,” Ms Okubo narrates.

    “But on getting there, Mr Kamau demanded that I must produce evidence that I had paid. I gave him the sales agreement, which acknowledged payment to Dinara, and had been signed by both of them as directors. When he realised I had all evidence, he told me Mr Muguku had to confirm in writing that indeed I had paid. Mr Muguku wrote me a letter to confirm this. Up to today, they have refused to hand over the two flats,” she says.

    Daily Nation has seen copies of the sales agreement documents between Roseteller Okubo and Yufnalis Okubo, and the then two directors of Dinara — Mr Muguku and Mr Kamau. Signed on different dates, the documents, sealed with company stamp, indicate that each of the directors confirmed receipt of a total of Sh5.4 million for the two apartments; C8 and C9.

    Mercidian properties Limited Director
    Mercidian properties Limited Director Roseteller Bukhala gestures during the interview at nation Center on December 15, 2017. PHOTO| FRANCIS NDERITU

    “She paid. Even the accountant at Dinara knew that the units had moved from the hands of Mr Muguku to Ms Okubo,” says Mr Gichuki.

    Asked to explain the turn of events, Mr Muguku said since the 10 units belonged personally to the directors, and not Dinara, it would not have been wise for the money to pass through the company’s accounts as it would cost them more in taxes.

    Mr Kamau maintains that Ms Okubo had paid the money to an individual account — Mr Muguku’s account — instead of paying to Dinara Properties. “The payment was not receipted by Dinara, and it is not in our accounting system. We never received any money from her, and we have no records in our accounting systems to show that she paid any money. I am still waiting to receive that payment,” said a furious Mr Kamau when he visited Nation offices.

    But the then salesman at Dinara, who directly handled Ms Okubo as his client, refutes Mr Kamau’s claims. “This is in contradiction to the earlier arrangement where each of the directors had communicated to the sales persons about selling their 10 individual units. The money was paid to their individual accounts,” says Mr Gichuki.

    Mr Kamau also denies having ever signed the agreement of purchase documents in the office although Mr Muguku, Ms Okubo and Mr Gichuki say he was present. He says that when the two agreements were being signed, he was on sick leave.

    But when questioned further, Mr Kamau cannot explain the duration when he was on sick leave, or the name of the hospital where he was treated. “I was on leave when a pile of documents were brought to my house for me to sign,” he says.

    When asked whether he read through the documents and noted that particular land purchase by Ms Okubo, he says: “I was just signing. You see, when it is someone whom you have done business with for years, you cannot even suspect anything fishy with them.”

    But Mr Muguku maintains that his then co-director did not sign the two purchase agreements in duress or ill-health, but while in his office in the presence of Ms Okubo, Mr Yufnalis, and Mr Gichuki. “Mr Kamau signed both sales agreements on different dates — not even as a witness. He signed as a director of Dinara,” says Mr Muguku.

    Interestingly, there is no contention about the other privately-owned three houses that Mr Muguku had sold through a similar arrangement. “Why these two?” Asks Mr Muguku.

    He now suspects foul play from a business partner. “We have transacted business worth hundreds of millions of shillings with Mr Kamau. We have grown together from humble means, why this one?” He asks.

    But according to Mr Gichuki, this is a small matter that Mr Kamau and Mr Muguku can sit down and resolve. “But for them to be able to do this, there must be honesty,” says Mr Gichuki, who has been following the matter for Ms Okubo.

    At the time when Nation was investigating the matter, both Mr Muguku and Mr Kamau asked for some time to meet their estranged clients — Ms Okubo and Mr Yufnalis to resolve the matter amicably. Eight months down the line, the matter is yet to be resolved. Unsure of when to get redress, Ms Okubo is contemplating moving to court.

    “I have a feeling that more people out here might have lost money the same way, and they could be suffering in silence. This includes some of the people that I had introduced to the said developers,” laments Ms Okubo.

    The allure of off-plan purchase schemes

    Off-plan housing schemes have become increasingly popular with a wider lot of Kenyans because of the convenience they offer to investors. Buying off-plan gives potential capital gains and room to acquire future assets at the current market price. This price appreciation at the completion of the project is an advantage.

    Buying a house off-plan also allows for flexible payment plans as all one needs is a deposit, which is usually 10 to 20 per cent of the purchase price, and the rest of the amount is either paid upon completion, or in flexible periodic instalments. This allows individuals without the financial muscle to purchase houses immediately to acquire homes they would otherwise not afford.

    The buyer is also able to select the best location for his or her house and can also pick the finishes of the house.

    This is advantageous as opposed to buying a complete house, where a buyer has to settle for whatever has been provided for by the developer.

    Off-plan purchases have a down-side. The buyer can lose the money invested in case the developer goes bust or if they are fraudulent.

    The other challenge could be poor quality of construction. Sometimes developers deliver substandard products hence the buyers do not get value for money unlike when buying a complete unit, where one negotiates the purchase price based on tangible evidence.

    More often than not, developers are unable to complete the houses in the promised time frame and this can affect the buyers’ financial plans. In rare cases, market conditions may change or the developer may over-promise returns such as rental yields and capital appreciation and on completion, the buyer achieves lower than expected returns.

    That is why it is good to assess the market value of the location when doing investor due diligence.

    Efforts by Kenya Insights to reach Urithi for a reply didn’t bare fruits as our mails went unanswered.

     

  • World Bank Approves Sh107 Billion Soft Loan For Kenya

    World Bank Approves Sh107 Billion Soft Loan For Kenya

    The World Bank will lend Kenya’s government $1 billion in budget support, its biggest financing package yet for the East African economy, according to Treasury Secretary Ukur Yatani.

    “The fact that World Bank does not provide budget support to countries with weak macro framework is a testimony of the confidence levels of the bank in our new policy reforms,” Yatani said on Twitter.

    The lending comes on the heels of a $739 million International Monetary Fund loan announced earlier this month in emergency support. Kenya has confirmed 963 Covid-19 infections.

    Kenya has plans to spend 53.7 billion shillings ($503 million) on a stimulus package to support businesses hit by the pandemic, which the Treasury says won’t affect its budget deficit. The financing gap is seen narrowing to 7.3% of gross domestic product in 2020-21 from an estimated 8.2% in the year through June.

  • Scientists In China Have Been Developing A Drug That Will End Coronavirus Without Vaccine

    Scientists In China Have Been Developing A Drug That Will End Coronavirus Without Vaccine

    A Chinese laboratory has been developing a drug it believes has the power to bring the coronavirus pandemic to a halt.

    The outbreak first emerged in China late last year before spreading across the world, prompting an international race to find treatments and vaccines.

    A drug being tested by scientists at China’s prestigious Peking University could not only shorten the recovery time for those infected, but even offer short-term immunity from the virus, researchers say.

    Sunney Xie, director of the university’s Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, told AFP that the drug has been successful at the animal testing stage.

    “When we injected neutralising antibodies into infected mice, after five days the viral load was reduced by a factor of 2,500,” said Xie.

    “That means this potential drug has (a) therapeutic effect.”

    The drug uses neutralising antibodies — produced by the human immune system to prevent the virus infecting cells — which Xie’s team isolated from the blood of 60 recovered patients.

    A study on the team’s research, published Sunday in the scientific journal Cell, suggests that using the antibodies provides a potential “cure” for the disease and shortens recovery time.

    Xie said his team had been working “day and night” searching for the antibody.

    “Our expertise is single-cell genomics rather than immunology or virology. When we realised that the single-cell genomic approach can effectively find the neutralising antibody we were thrilled.”

    He added that the drug should be ready for use later this year and in time for any potential winter outbreak of the virus, which has infected 4.8 million people around the world and killed more than 315,000.

    “Planning for the clinical trial is underway,” said Xie, adding it will be carried out in Australia and other countries since cases have dwindled in China, offering fewer human guinea pigs for testing.

    “The hope is these neutralised antibodies can become a specialised drug that would stop the pandemic,” he said.

    China already has five potential coronavirus vaccines at the human trial stage, a health official said last week.

    But the World Health Organization has warned that developing a vaccine could take 12 to 18 months.

    Scientists have also pointed to the potential benefits of plasma — a blood fluid — from recovered individuals who have developed antibodies to the virus enabling the body’s defences to attack it.

    More than 700 patients have received plasma therapy in China, a process which authorities said showed “very good therapeutic effects”.

    “However, it (plasma) is limited in supply,” Xie said, noting that the 14 neutralising antibodies used in their drug could be put into mass production quickly.

    – Prevention and cure –

    Using antibodies in drug treatments is not a new approach, and it has been successful in treating several other viruses such as HIV, Ebola and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS).

    Xie said his researchers had “an early start” since the outbreak started in China before spreading to other countries.

    Ebola drug Remdesivir was considered a hopeful early treatment for COVID-19 — clinical trials in the US showed it shortened the recovery time in some patients by a third — but the difference in mortality rate was not significant.

    The new drug could even offer short-term protection against the virus.

    The study showed that if the neutralising antibody was injected before the mice were infected with the virus, the mice stayed free of infection and no virus was detected.

    This may offer temporary protection for medical workers for a few weeks, which Xie said they are hoping to “extend to a few months”.

    More than 100 vaccines for COVID-19 are in the works globally, but as the process of vaccine development is more demanding, Xie is hoping that the new drug could be a faster and more efficient way to stop the global march of the coronavirus.

    “We would be able to stop the pandemic with an effective drug, even without a vaccine,” he said.

  • Kenya Will Not Seek To Be Exempted From Loan Repayments Aimed At Helping Poor Countries

    Kenya Will Not Seek To Be Exempted From Loan Repayments Aimed At Helping Poor Countries

    (Reuters) – Kenya will not seek a suspension of debt payments under a G20 initiative aimed at helping poor countries weather the COVID-19 pandemic, its finance minister said on Friday, saying the terms of the deal were too restrictive.

    Minister Ukur Yatani told Reuters in an interview he was also concerned about the impact that debt relief might have on Kenya’s credit rating.

    The Group of 20 major economies last month agreed to suspend payment obligations on bilateral debt owed by their least developed counterparts through the end of the year. The goal was to free up more than $20 billion that poor governments could use to buttress their health services.

    But Yatani said he was concerned that terms of the deal limiting countries’ access to international capital markets during the standstill could hinder Kenya’s ability to finance its deficit later in the year.

    “We fear we might unnecessarily create a crisis,” he said.

    The East African nation is instead engaging creditor countries including Germany, Sweden, Japan, China and France individually with the goal of securing moratoriums on debt service payments lasting around a year.

    “We have not concluded (negotiations), but it is progressing well,” he said.

    The G20 initiative only covers official bilateral debt, though it calls for the voluntary participation of private lenders on comparable terms.

    A third of Kenya’s 3 trillion shilling ($28 billion) external debt is owed to private creditors including holders of the country’s two Eurobonds.

    “The G20 debt relief initiative does not offer optimal benefit given the structure of Kenya’s debt portfolio,” he said. “Every country adapts to the situation based on its own circumstances.”

    The pandemic has caused the government’s budget deficit to swell to 8.2% of GDP in the financial year to the end of June, from an initial forecast of under 7%, mainly due to reduced tax collection and foregone revenue in the form of VAT and income tax cuts.

    But the deficit is projected to narrow to 7.3% – equivalent to 823.2 billion shillings – in the 2020/21 fiscal year and to 4.2% of GDP by 2023/24, Yatani said.

    “Kenya is taking a cautious approach of seeking debt relief from bilateral creditors to safeguard its sovereign credit rating,” he said.

    Moody’s downgraded Kenya’s outlook to negative from stable on May 7 citing the shock caused by the COVID-19 pandemic to its tourism industry and farm exports.

    On Tuesday, the IMF raised it’s risk of debt distress to high from moderate.

    The minister sought to assure investors, saying: “We have adequate reserves to manage our payments for the next one year.”

    The government has included a 55 billion shillings stimulus package aimed at preserving employment and consumer demand in the budget for the next fiscal year, which will be presented to parliament on June 11.

    The cash will go towards grants for small businesses such as hotels and nature conservancies hard hit by the collapse of tourism.

    The economy is projected to grow by 3% this year, falling to 2.5% if the crisis worsens, down from an initial forecast of more than 6%, Yatani said.

    He attributed the forecast, which is higher than that of the IMF and the World Bank, to adequate rainfall across the country which will boost food production.

    ($1 = 107 Kenyan shillings)

  • Badi Nullifies All Building Plans Approved In The Last Two Months, Fires Sonko’s Team

    Badi Nullifies All Building Plans Approved In The Last Two Months, Fires Sonko’s Team

    The newly set up Nairobi Metropolitan Services (NMS) has suspended the city’s e-construction system that allows property developers to make online application for building permits, taking builders back to the regime of manual application of plan approvals.

    In a public notice on Wednesday, NMS director-general Mohammed Abdalla Badi stopped the electronic processing of applications for building plans and directed developers to submit applications at the Services’ Kenyatta International Convention Centre offices.

    “The e-construction development application processing system formerly managed by (Nairobi City County) is suspended immediately pending formation of a new system. All applications should continue to be filed to NMS DG’s office at KICC first floor,” he said.

    Major General Badi further said that all plans processed through the e-construction system “from March 18, 2020 to date and going forward are and will be null and avoid”. This means affected developers will have to submit their plans afresh at the NMS offices.

    The general also disbanded both the Nairobi City County Pre-Technical Committee and the Nairobi City County Urban Planning Technical Committee – with immediate effect.

    “New Nairobi City County Pre-Technical and the Nairobi City County Urban Planning Technical committees shall be constituted within seven days from the date hereof,” he said.

    The team, which was responsible for evaluating and recommending, building plans for approval, was made up of officials selected by Governor Mike Sonko in consultation with industry stakeholders.

    Its members included Nairobi director of urban planning Ruth Waruguru, planning compliance and enforcement director Jusper Ndeke, development director Dominic Mutegi, acting secretary Justus Kathenge, and enforcement assistant director Fredrick Ochanda.

    The NCCG was next month expected to activate the third module of the e-construction system dubbed e-inspection, which together with the online application of approval plans and the online QR Code system would have reduced approval time for permits while simplifying inspection of buildings in the city.

    The online QR Code system, which was launched last month, provides unique identification of all approved architectural and structural plans, thereby eliminating the requirement for developers to submit hard copies of development plans for stamping upon approval.

    There are fears that suspension of the system will result in stagnation of building approvals, leading to rescheduling of multi-billion-shilling projects due to lack of permits.

    A delay in approvals in the second half of 2019 led to a Sh69 billion drop in the value of approved plans in Nairobi where only Sh141 billion projects were approved last year compared with Sh210 billion projects in 2018.

  • Kenyan Fishermen Sees A Boom In Business With The Cut Of Frozen Chinese Fish From The Market

    Kenyan Fishermen Sees A Boom In Business With The Cut Of Frozen Chinese Fish From The Market

    The coronavirus pandemic has handed Kenyan fishermen an unexpected boon – a rush of customers who now shun imported Chinese frozen fillets in favour of freshly caught fish from Lake Victoria.

    Kenya bought over Sh2.4 billion ($23.2 million) worth of frozen fish from China in 2018, according to the International Trade Center, almost all of its fish imports. Fishermen have long complained that the cheap imports were strangling local trade.The coronavirus has slowed Chinese imports. Nervous customers have turned to local fish. But Kenya will soon face shortages unless imports from China resume; it produces just over a third of what it consumes.

    Kenyan fishermen like 38-year-old Maurice Misodhi, whose skin has been weathered by the sun and wind during two decades on the water, have had a bumper month. Based at Dunga Beach in Kisumu, customers want every fish he catches. Misodhi says the Chinese lockdown seemed to have dried up imports of cheaper Chinese fish.“As fishermen we can now smile, not because people are suffering from coronavirus, but because we can now sell our fish, and at a good price,” he said.

    The price of a kilo of Nile perch – Sh250 a month ago – has shot up to Sh350.Fish trader Mary Didi usually buys from Chinese suppliers but has now turned to Misodhi.

    “The supply at the Chinese importers has gone down, and many of my customers were also scared of the Chinese fish, thinking they would contract the virus,” she said. “To keep the business running, I had to turn to fish from the lake.”Bob Otieno, chairman of Dunga Beach Management Unit, says sales have shot up. The beach registers a catch of between 1 and 1.5 tonnes of fish each day and sales have gone up from 50 per cent of the catch to 90 per cent in the last two weeks. Previously, fishermen would eat, barter or give away around half their catch. “We used to have many fishermen sell their catch at low prices because of competition from the Chinese fish,” he said.Kenya produces 180,000 tonnes per year but consumes about 500,000 tonnes, according to 2019 government figures.Christine Adhiambo, the government’s assistant director of fisheries for the lake region, said the two biggest importers of Chinese fish had not shipped from China since November and were running down stocks. Kenya could face shortages soon, she said.

    “Kenya cannot satisfy its local fish demand,” she said. “That is why we heavily rely on supplements from China.”

  • IMF Executive Board Approves A Sh.78Billion Emergency Loan To Kenya For Coronavirus

    IMF Executive Board Approves A Sh.78Billion Emergency Loan To Kenya For Coronavirus

    • The IMF approved the disbursement of US$739 million to be drawn under the Rapid Credit Facility to support the authorities’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
    • The COVID-19 pandemic is taking a serious toll on the Kenyan economy, significantly reducing growth, creating fiscal and external financing needs.
    • It is important that the authorities resume their fiscal consolidation plans to reduce macroeconomic vulnerabilities once the crisis abates.

    The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) today approved the disbursement of SDR542.8 million (100 percent of quota, about US$739 million) to be drawn under the Rapid Credit Facility (RCF). This will help to meet Kenya’s urgent balance of payments need stemming from the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The impact of COVID-19 on the Kenyan economy will be severe. It will act through both global and domestic channels, and downside risks remain large. While the authorities have taken decisive action to respond to the pandemic’s health and economic impacts, the sudden shock has left Kenya with significant fiscal and external financing needs. Authorities have committed to resume their fiscal consolidation plans once the crisis abates to reduce debt vulnerabilities.

    The RCF will help the authorities to address those needs. It will allow them to maintain an adequate level of international reserves and help provide the budget financing needed to respond to the pandemic.

    The IMF is in close contact with the Kenyan authorities and stands ready to provide policy advice and further support, as needed.

    At the conclusion of the Board discussion, Mr. Tao Zhang, Deputy managing Director and Acting Chair, stated:

    “The COVID-19 pandemic has delivered a large economic shock to Kenya. The pandemic has impacted nearly all facets of the economy—particularly tourism, transport, and trade—and led to urgent balance of payments and fiscal financing needs.

    “Emergency financing under the RCF will deliver liquidity support to help Kenya cover its balance of payments gap this year. It will provide much-needed resources for fiscal interventions to safeguard public health and support households and firms affected by the crisis. It will also catalyze necessary financing from other donors.

    “A pause in the authorities’ fiscal consolidation plans to accommodate COVID-19-related measures is appropriate. These measures should be temporary and well-targeted. Once the crisis abates, it is critical that the authorities resume their pursuit of a growth-friendly medium-term fiscal adjustment, including raising revenues as a share of GDP, to reduce debt vulnerabilities.

    “The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) has taken various measures to maintain sufficient liquidity in the financial sector. It should continue to stand ready to further support the economy and the financial sector’s health, as necessary, while ensuring that policy decisions are data-driven. The CBK should also continue to allow the exchange rate to act as a shock absorber.

    “To ensure that COVID-19 related resources are used for their intended purpose, the authorities plan to conduct independent post-crisis auditing of COVID-19 related expenditures and publish the results.”

  • PHOTOS: Dr. Alfred Mutua’s Statehouse Lookalike County Headquarter Unveiled In Machakos

    PHOTOS: Dr. Alfred Mutua’s Statehouse Lookalike County Headquarter Unveiled In Machakos

    Dr. Mutua prefers to be unique and the latest development is straight off his book. The Governor has unveiled his own statehouse that will house the county government. The real cost is yet to be known but could be in hundreds of millions.

    While many internet citizens continue to question the relevance of the new offices. Surveys out the Governor ahead of many.

    You can see the photos of the new home below;

  • How Murang’a Government Managed To Build An ICU In 21 Days

    How Murang’a Government Managed To Build An ICU In 21 Days

    When Governor Mwangi wa Iria announced that his administration will build and make operational an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 21 days, many of his critics dismissed the idea.

    On April 9, construction of a 35-bed capacity ICU facility kicked off at Murang’a Level-5 hospital and on Friday, May 1, the unit was fully completed and ready to admit patients.

    The county government opted to use its engineers and mobilised resources that made the construction works fast.

    The administration decided not to go for tedious tendering process and thus tasked engineers employed by the county government to implement the project.

    Speaking as he supervised final installation of equipment at the unit, governor Wa Iria said most government projects delay due to prolonged tendering process and granting works to untrustworthy contractors.

    “If we opted to go through normal tendering process, construction of this facility could take not less than two years and the pricing could be enormous,” said Wa Iria.

    The county engineers supervised the construction works on 24-hour basis to ensure that the building is standard and is completed in the given period.
    Materials for construction were sourced locally and members of the community especially those who lost their jobs due to Covid 19 pandemic, were mobilised to provide labour in the construction of the ICU believed to be the biggest yet in Mount Kenya region.

    The facility, Wa Iri said will offer needed critical care services at this time the country is faced by Covid-19 pandemic and even in post Coronavirus era.

    “This facility will not only serve residents of Murang’a but anyone in need of critical care services across the country. The cost will be minimal considering this is a public facility,” he added.
    According to Wa Iria, the ICU facility is a big boost to the government’s agenda to provide universal health care to millions of Kenyans.

    “This time the country is facing threat of Coronavirus; this ICU will play an integral part in provision of critical care unit. The facility is free to get referrals from other counties,” he further noted.
    Medical superintendent of Murang’a Level -5 hospital Dr. Leonard Gikera observed that the hospital has been referring at least two people per week for critical health care in other hospitals especially those in Nairobi.

    He noted that the ICU will provided needed services and save lives of many since there will be no transfers as far as critical services its concerned.
    County executive member for infrastructure and transport engineer Amos Njoroge and who was entrusted to deliver the project within 21 days said the quality of the building was not compromised.

    “The house was built in required standards. Every precaution was observed to ensure the quality was not compromised despite short period of constructing the house,” added Njoroge.

    Meanwhile the governor said they have entered into partnership with Aga khan hospital to help run the ICU at initial days as the hospital management lays down logistics of running the same.

    He however said the official opening will be delayed in the interest of keeping the Coronavirus prevention protocols. “For now the ICU will be operational but official commissioning will wait till time the Covid-19 will be contained so that we invite his Excellency the president to officially open the facility,” he added.
    By Bernard Munyao

  • China And Africa’s Debt: Yes To Relief No To Blanket Forgiveness

    China And Africa’s Debt: Yes To Relief No To Blanket Forgiveness

    By Yun Sun

    As COVID-19 exacerbates the pressure on vulnerable public health systems in Africa, the economic outlook of African countries is also becoming increasingly unstable. Just this month, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) projected that the region’s economic growth will shrink by an unprecedented 1.6 percent in 2020 amid tighter financial conditions, a sharp decline in key export prices, and severe disruptions to economic activity linked to the pandemic. Anticipating the upcoming turbulence, key stakeholders—including the IMF and World Bank, sovereign governments such as France, and thought leaders in think tanks such as Brookings—have all called for debt relief to encourage post-coronavirus economic recovery. Indeed, on April 14, the IMF approved $500 million to cancel six months of debt payments for 25 countries, 19 of which are in Africa.

    Even with this massive debt relief by so many players in the international community, without the participation of China in this endeavor, African countries still stand to suffer. Indeed, Beijing is widely regarded as the single largest creditor to Africa. The Jubilee Debt Campaign—a coalition of organizations in the United Kingdom dedicated to debt relief for developing countries—has calculated that, as of 2018, around 20 percent of all African government debt is owed to China. Due to the magnitude of these debts, some experts argue that China holds a special role—as it is in the  “driver’s seat”—for the debt relief campaign for Africa. French President Emmanuel Macron has even personally called for China to provide debt relief for African countries.

    So far, China’s response has been reserved. In a response to an inquiry by Reuters about China’s position on the debt relief, the Chinese Foreign Ministry commented that“the origin of Africa’s debt problem is complex and the debt profile of each country varies,” and that it understood “that some countries and international organizations have called for debt relief programs for African countries and are willing to study the possibility of it with the international community.” At the G-20 Meeting of Finance Ministers and Central Bankers on April 16, Chinese Finance Minister Liu Kun merely commented, “China supports the suspension of debt repayment by least developed countries and will make its necessary contributions to the consensus reached at G-20.”

    So, what China will eventually do about this massive amounts of debt Africa owes remains to be seen. At a minimum, as a member of the IMF and World Bank, China will likely participate in that collective debt relief effort. However, China is unlikely to take a unilateral approach to debt forgiveness, especially on concessional loans and commercial loans, which constitute the majority of African debts owed to China. Rather than outright relief, postponement of loan payments, debt restructuring, and debt/equity swap are more likely in China’s playbook.

    What debt?

    The key question when it comes to possible debt relief by China really depends on which debt is being discussed. Forgiving zero-interest loans for poor and least-developed countries in Africa has been a tradition for China. In 2005, China announced forgiveness of $10 billion zero-interest loans for Africa. By the first quarter of 2009, China had canceled 150 such loans owed by 32 African countries. In 2018, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced forgiveness of all intergovernmental zero-interest loans for least-developed African countries with diplomatic relations with China.

    However, zero-interest loans make up only a small portion of Africa’s debt owed to China. From 2000 to 2017, China provided $143 billion in loans to African governments and their state-owned enterprises—the majority of which are concessional loans, credit lines, and development financing. Among the $60 billion China pledged to Africa at the 2015 Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC), concessional loans, credit lines, and African small- and mid-sized enterprise loans jointly constitute 70 percent of the total—with only 9 percent of the announced funding in zero-interest loans. At the 2018 FOCAC, where China again pledged $60 billion to Africa, half of the money was credit lines and development finance, with grants and interest-free loans jointly accounting for less than 25 percent of the total.

    If China is to follow this pattern, the most likely loans to be forgiven will be those zero-interest ones. The same cannot be said for the concessional and other loans because of their magnitude (and, consequently, the massive financial losses) as well as the precedent the move would set for other regions and the implications for responsible borrowing by African states.

    What relief?

    Debt forgiveness is not the only option, and debt forgiveness of concessional and other loans is perhaps a least desired option for China. Given the magnitude of the Chinese loans in Africa, even partial forgiveness will create major financial losses for China, whose economy has also suffered tremendously from the COVID-19-induced domestic economic slowdown and the trade war with the United States.

    Precedent tells us that, for China, even if debt relief is to be provided, China will look at individual African countries case by case and design individual strategies with various methods of debt relief. Indeed—rather than blanket debt relief—debt reduction, postponement of loan payments, refinancing, and debt restructuring are all options with which China has had experience in Africa and other regions. In the case of Ethiopia, in 2018, China agreed to a restructuring of debt, including the $4 billion loan for the Addis-Djibouti railway, extending the repayment terms by 20 years. In the case of Hambantota port in Sri Lanka, China turned the debt into a 99-year lease of the port and surrounding land. In the suspended Myitsone dam in Myanmar, China has proposed to turn the disbursed investment, which the Burmese government cannot afford to repay, into equities in new dams in the country. Debt renegotiations have also happened between Beijing and Ghana, Zambia, and Angola, although the details are less transparent.

    Whose relief?

    Debt forgiveness by China without similar forgiveness by other lenders is seen as neither fair nor feasible: China certainly will not allow itself be singled out as the only party that needs to provide the debt relief in these other areas to Africa. Why should China carry the—quite substantial—financial loss alone? Indeed, Beijing points out that China is, in fact, not the largest creditor given that the multilateral financial institutions and the private sector own 35 and 32 percent, respectively, of Africa’s debt. China’s own share is only 20 percent. With this view, China is more likely to participate in collective debt forgiveness with multilateral institutions and other lenders, instead of chartering its own course unilaterally. If there is major debt forgiveness by other governments and China is encouraged to participate, China can’t afford to lose out on the reputational front. But the level and extent of its contribution are unlikely to exceed the average—meaning that, if the international community wants China’s debt relief to be aggressive, its debt relief must also be aggressive. All this points to the importance of joint actions by the international community, especially donor/lender consultation and coordination.

    Domestic factors: Growing local antagonism against Africans

    Other factors also complicate China’s potential debt relief to Africa. Domestically, the recent controversy of Chinese racism against Africans in China, largely because of the coronavirus, has instigated nationalistic sentiment in China against “ungrateful” Africans. For Beijing to provide massive debt relief to African countries at this time would run the risk of domestic criticism along the theme of squandering Chinese tax payers’ money to appease unappreciative African nationals.

    What happens next?

    For China, simple debt forgiveness hardly encourages responsible borrowing from African governments down the road—we only need to look to the African eurobond rushover the past few years that has also contributed to the debt problem today. The Chinese worry that their debt forgiveness will improve African governments’ debt ratio, and free them to borrow more debts from international financiers. In that case, China’s losses will translate into more debts Africa will borrow.

    Given the complex factors and China’s history with African debt, the international community must be realistic when calling on debt relief from China, putting resources and attention toward mutual consultation and coordination toward collective decisions and burden-sharing. China will not be left out. But it is also unlikely to lead. Short-term relief is expected but massive debt forgiveness in the long run may not be in the cards.

    For more on the need for debt relief in Africa, see COVID-19 and debt standstill for Africa: The G-20’s action is an important first step that must be complemented, scaled up, and broadened.

    The writer is a nonresident fellow with the Africa Growth Initiative. She also serves as co-director of the East Asia Program, and director of the China Program at the Stimson Center.

  • Will COVID-19 Be the End of Africans in Guangzhou? I Think So, and This Is Why

    Will COVID-19 Be the End of Africans in Guangzhou? I Think So, and This Is Why

    Migration to China will never be the same after COVID-19. The health crisis and its consequences will severely impact on local, translocal, and transnational forms of migration. Once COVID-19 ceases to be a threat, foreigners in China will face a new regime of mobility characterized by artificial intelligence-based surveillance technologies.

    In a post-pandemic China, there will be little or no room for the irregular forms of migration, mobility, and abode that have made possible the existence of thriving African communities in the Pearl River Delta region.

    Is this the end of African migration to China as we know it?

    Will COVID-19 fundamentally change the ways in which we think about migration and mobility in the PRC, and in the world at large?

    I think so.

    As it is now well known, over the last fortnight, an ongoing number of incidents have emerged through social media where black people have been mistreated, persecuted, evicted from their houses and hotel rooms (without prior notice which has effectively left many of them homeless and denied entrance into commercial venues (such as restaurants) in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou, capital of Guangdong province.

    These incidents were triggered by Guangzhou’s local government decision to implement a strict surveillance and testing program and impose a 14-day quarantine on all African nationals, regardless of travel history or testing results.

    These measures were supposed to prevent a potential outbreak in this foreign community. However, they got out of control.

    The deluge of evidence shared through social media prompted a strong, and unprecedented response in Africa, where many governments summoned Chinese ambassadors to answer for the incidents.

    A great deal of the indignation on the African side was compounded by the fact that many in the continent saw Africa’s role in the early days of the pandemic as strongly supportive of China.

    So, the images of black people sleeping under bridges, families with children being evicted from their legally rented places of abode, as well as entrance and service denial to blacks, were seen by many not only as a form of Chinese racism but, perhaps more importantly, as a Chinese betrayal of African solidarity in these difficult times.

    Africa’s strong diplomatic response forced China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs to address the issue.

    Unsurprisingly, China’s response was to deflect and spin the narrative as yet another situation distorted by Western media and fake news, and to point out that China does not discriminate against any foreigners.

    A crucial element in the attempt to spin the narrative has been to emphasize a couple of COVID-19 related incidents: the first around a Nigerian patient who after testing positive for the virus attempted to escape confinement and violently attacked medical personnel.

    The second incident relates to a group of Nigerians who, while infected, were roaming around the city and patronizing restaurants and shopping centers.

    These cases have effectively been used to shift the blame onto the African population for not abiding by the rules.

    COVID-19 may well mark the entrance to a new stage in the process of the construction of a global architecture of control and surveillance. African overstayers and the thriving commercial sectors in which they insert themselves may be among the first ‘victims’ of the new normal in China.

    For the last two decades, Guangzhou has been at the forefront of the African presence in China. Due to the overwhelming presence of foreigners, the city’s foreign population management capabilities have been put to a test. This has often resulted in tensions between foreign communities (mostly West African who often report harassment and discrimination) and local police; and between local, provincial, and national policymakers (while Beijing grants thousands of entry permits to African nationals for diverse political reasons, Guangdong’s authorities feel that they are the ones who have to deal with the urban impacts of Beijing’s policies in relation to African nationals).

    The practical implication of this governance disjuncture is that, throughout the last decade, the city of Guangzhou has seen a sharp rise in the numbers of foreigners that overstay their visas.

    In 2014, in the context of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, and to allay fears of a potential spread in China, Guangzhou’s government reported that some 16,000 Africans were legally residing in the city. Last week, in the midst of the controversy, local authorities reported that the whole African population, consisting of some 4,500 individuals, had been tested. A sharp decline in the population in only six years. However, these figures describe the legal residents, not the overstayers. It is well known that visa overstayers (mostly West Africans) account for a significant portion of the African population in the city.

    A great deal of the intense commercial activity that takes place between Guangzhou and places like Addis Ababa, Mombasa or Lagos is organized by them. As in many other parts of the world, one of the paths that these overstayers take is that of hiding (or ‘losing’) their passports. By doing so, they ‘voluntarily’ become undocumented, and effectively set themselves down a highly precarious path where the main aim is to be untraceable if caught overstaying.

    Untraceability, however, does not bode well in a pandemics scenario where asymptomatic individuals shed the virus, and where one of the main strategies is to ‘test and trace’ in order to mitigate.

    Accordingly, Guangzhou’s longstanding overstayer population is cast in a new light under COVID-19. Local authorities not only fear an outbreak among the city’s foreign communities (especially amongst a group of foreigners without clear, stable and documented identities) but also a central government crackdown/purge on them (the local authorities) were Guangzhou’s foreign community to become a virus hotbed. The impossibility of fully managing and/or controlling the overstayer population exacerbates these pandemic-related fears and anxieties.

    [Technology, surveillance and foreign mobility in post-pandemic China] COVID-19 is proving to be a landmark in terms of the relation between technology, mass surveillance and mobility control in the country. From the use of robots and drones to facial recognition and multiple apps, one of the most widely reported aspects of the Chinese response to the outbreak has been the country’s reliance on technology and artificial intelligence.

    At this point, it is impossible to ascertain for just how long we will live with COVID-19. It is not unthinkable that special mobility measures could remain in place even after COVID-19 ceases to be a threat. In a post-pandemics China, undocumented individuals will have a hard time trying to circumvent these new technological hurdles.

    For example, without a legal abode, it is impossible for foreigners to apply for Alipay Health Code, a system that assigns a color code to users indicating their health status, and determining their access to public spaces such as malls, subways, and airports. This is having a significant impact on the forms of mobility that are allowed, and the ones that are disallowed, in the country.

    In the past, foreign migration in the country was driven by the traditional logics of trade (e.g. commercial migrants) and, for those with illegal status, a cat-mouse circumvention game. In the near future, the new regime of foreign mobility in China will be a post-pandemic one driven by rationales of crisis and emergency.

    Fear and anxiety will be the logic of this regime, which will be compounded by surveillance through technology. Indeed, it will be almost impossible to be an undocumented or sans papiers individual in this context. The invisibility and untraceability often associated with undocumented individuals will be regarded by authorities as ‘high-risk’ in the new massive surveillance program in place in China.

    COVID-19 may well mark the entrance to a new stage in the process of the construction of a global architecture of control and surveillance. African overstayers and the thriving commercial sectors in which they insert themselves may be among the first ‘victims’ of the new normal in China.

    Indeed, this may well be the end of traditional forms of irregular abode, at least in China. COVID-19 may, or may not, be the end of migration as we understood it since the early 20c, but it may well be the last nail in the coffin of an already declining African population in GZ.

  • IMF, WHO Urge Caution On Trade Restrictions

    IMF, WHO Urge Caution On Trade Restrictions

    The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) urged governments to exercise caution when implementing trade restrictions during the coronavirus pandemic.

    Countries can implement temporary export limits to prevent domestic shortages of critical goods but “taken collectively, export restrictions can be dangerously counterproductive,” the IMF and the WTO said in a joint statement on Friday.

    “In particular, we are concerned by supply disruptions from the growing use of export restrictions and other actions that limit trade of key medical supplies and food,” the statement said.

    In 2019, exports of crucial goods, such as personal protective equipment, cleaners and ventilators, which are critical to fight against the novel coronavirus, were $300 billion, it recalled.

    Noting that governments have taken several measures, including cutting import duties or curbing customs-clearance processes, the statement said: “We welcome these actions. Accelerating imports of critical medical supplies translates into saving lives and livelihoods.”

    “Similar attention should be paid to facilitating exports of key items like drugs, protective gear, and ventilators,” it added.

    The joint statement also warned regarding the supply of trade finance, saying: “Adequate trade finance is important to ensure that imports of food and essential medical equipment reach the economies where they are most needed.”

    In addition, it said, critical workers for agricultural production are not able to move while new cropping seasons are starting.

    “We urge governments to address these challenges in a safe and proportionate manner,” it underlined.

    After originating in China last December, the novel coronavirus has spread to at least 185 countries and regions, with Europe and the US currently the worst-hit regions.

    The pandemic has killed over 192,000 people, with total infections exceeding 2.73 million, while more than 752,100 have recovered, according to U.S.-based Johns Hopkins University.

  • Amidst The Coronavirus Pandemic, There’s A Silver Lining For Africa

    Amidst The Coronavirus Pandemic, There’s A Silver Lining For Africa

    By Aidan Hartley

    Red roses are hardly a priority for people in a virus-wrecked global economy, and one day recently the world’s flower market pretty much collapsed. At the vast Aalsmeer auction in Holland, there were scented mountains of unsold roses, gerberas and tulips. Some last stems still find their way into bouquets across a world that has cancelled all gatherings except funerals. But in the coming months, cut flowers might become a sight as rare as bananas were for children in the Blitz.

    This story is a disaster for Kenya, my home country, which was until last month a top flower exporter. While western states repurpose their economies towards becoming vast hospitals, Africa is too poor to cope with the medical emergency, and virus deaths will probably not be the greatest challenge ahead. Even in a good year, multitudes go hungry, while respiratory diseases, diarrhoea, Aids, malaria, tuberculosis and measles scythe down 3.5 million people. In Kenya, some wags have pointed out that police enforcing a dusk-to-dawn curfew have already killed more people than the virus has locally — but later, accurately calculating total deaths from Covid-19 in Africa will involve greater guesswork even than elsewhere, since mathematical modelling tends to get lost in the Congo’s rainforests or the shifting sands of Somalia.

    If the virus spares the young, Africa is better off than Europe. Our median age is less than 20; three quarters are under 35. Most ordinary folk are fit, slim, non-smoking and healthy. Few live beyond 60, since misrule has so impoverished many hospitals that they lack even aspirins. The local joke in Kenya is that we have more parliamentarians (350) than ICU beds (130). ‘Underlying health issues’ affect mainly the tiny urban class of richer, often politically connected folk, who pick up westerners’ bad habits. In other words, the pandemic’s main victims might be ageing politicians and their hangers–on, who find themselves unable to fly their private jets to Europe for treatment — a cull of sugar-fed, obese oligarchs.

    Starkest of all will be Africa’s economic collapse, wiping out jobs for many of the continent’s 1.2 billion people. Tourism, vital to the conservation of wildlife, forests and monuments, has fallen apart. Mining, oil and gas are close behind. Exports of tea, coffee and cocoa are also being hit hard. Until recently Africa served as a giant nursery, raising migrants to supply cheap labour for rich countries. Every month these workers send money home to their families, and remittances are now the largest source of foreign exchange in many countries. As diaspora Africans fall out of work, these funds are evaporating. In the high-density slums, each breadwinner might feed ten mouths. Nairobi city governor Mike Sonko promised mass distributions of Hennessy cognac because ‘alcohol plays a major role in killing the coronavirus’ — but such clowning aside, slum-dwellers have no cash reserves, nor a welfare state to rescue them. As global supply chains collapse, it becomes horribly clear that out of 54 African states, only Zambia is a net food exporter. Many Africans routinely rely on food aid. For oil-dependent Nigeria’s nearly 200 million people, life is about to get tough.

    Even before the pandemic, debt-laden Africa was gazing into an economic abyss deepened by spendthrift policies and crashing commodity prices. South Africa’s junk status is now at the optimistic end of the spectrum. ‘Sub-Saharan countries with no exception that I can think of have gorged on borrowing and balance sheets are maxed out,’ according to Kenya’s most prominent economic analyst, Aly-Khan Satchu. ‘It’s biblical.’ Without restructuring, central banks will default, especially on their vast loans from China, which has built so much sub-standard, bribe-soaked belt and road infrastructure. The recent mistreatment of black people in Guangzhou has horrified Africans, who know where the virus came from. China has flooded the continent with its citizens, who along the way have set out to poach and eat every African wild species imaginable — sea slugs, elephants, rhinos, big cats, aardvarks, tortoises, donkeys, pangolins. Naturally, Africa’s leaders have taken their begging bowls to the IMF and World Bank, asking for a mega-bailout. ‘This time hopefully those institutions will be more intelligent about how the money is spent, rather than just shovelling it out to leaders who all round trip it offshore,’ says Satchu.

    Britain’s approach to this is upsetting. Boris’s government says ‘all our resources’ must focus on beating the virus. The FCO urges thousands of Brits to come home, fleeing the Commonwealth and foreign investments that until March were such a key part of post-Brexit policy. Masks and ventilators are the language of diplomacy now. Until this month the British Army had its largest overseas training operation near my house in Kenya, but due to fears of civil unrest the mission has been mothballed. There are more jihadi terrorists in Africa than anywhere else these days, and al Qaeda and Isis affiliates have exploited recent disarray to escalate violence and seize territory. As the UK moves gazillions in private debt to the government’s balance sheet and tax revenue disappears, one wonders how DfID’s aid budget of £14 billion can be justified. Since the same will go for other newly poor western donors, Africa will be left on its own.

    Yet there is a silver lining. Some years ago, the Arab rulers of Sudan shut down the pipeline that traverses its territory towards the Red Sea, pumping crude oil production from its southern neighbour, South Sudan. When the embargo hit I predicted social collapse. Yet nothing changed, because South Sudan’s rulers had always stolen all the oil money. The ministers’ fat sons had to cut back on spare parts for their gold-plated Hummers, whereas most local people simply woke up in the morning to dig their fields and grow sorghum, manioc and vegetables.

    In the same way now, people across Africa will struggle by on the land, relying on extended family relationships. Unless there is a dramatic reordering of the system, some states will fail, swept away in urban uprisings and fresh civil conflicts. Surely it’s time to abolish or reform the edifice of international aid that has propped up this kleptocracy for decades — the racket run by UN agencies and leftist charities like Oxfam. Covid-19 is the Chernobyl moment for bad regimes and badly managed aid programmes in Africa. Pestilence heralds a time of change more dramatic perhaps than any since the colonial scramble for Africa. It’s the end of an epoch and an opportunity for ordinary Africans to build a better future for themselves.

    Author is a writer with UK magazine The Spectator.

  • Experts On What Could Save Africa From Coronavirus

    Experts On What Could Save Africa From Coronavirus

    Experts have warned against any complacency in Africa, although the coronavirus pandemic has so far produced relatively few reported deaths on the continent.

    Speaking to Anadolu Agency, Deputy Director of the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Ahmed Ogwell Ouma said the quick response by different countries and less mobility of people in the continent has so far saved the continent.

    “Africa is different because we started acting quickly. When we saw the pandemic spreading, we began to prepare. And governments began to put in place mechanisms to identify those who may have the disease, to test them and to follow up those who may have been exposed,” he said.

    Ouma said due to past experiences that have devoured many lives in African countries, they started early, unlike much privileged European and American counterparts.

    He said the less mobility of people and the absence of a rapid transport system also made a difference.

    “The second difference is that in Africa the modes of travel as not the same as the rest of the world. Someone in Addis Ababa is unlikely to go outside the city frequently. And the modes of transport are poor. In other parts of the world, air travel is the most common means. And people travel quite frequently, which also made the virus to travel fast,” said Ouma.

    He, however, cautioned that it was not time to celebrate as the continent is not completely out of danger.

    “We must remain vigilant to make sure we do not have many infected people. It will be a disaster in the continent, “he said.

    The top expert also complained that lockdown across the continent has also affected medical and other supplies. He said there was a need to start solidarity flights to transport supplies.

    Of the five regions in Africa, northern Africa has taken over southern Africa as the most affected both in terms of cases and deaths. According to U.S.-based John Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Centre, Egypt has so far reported 3,490 infected cases with 264 deaths, while South Africa registered 3,465 cases and 58 deaths.

    East Africa least affected

    East Africa has been least affected so far. Djibouti, with a population of 958,920 has registered 945 cases, while its neighbor Ethiopia with 110 million population has so far 114 confirmed cases.

    Like all over the world, Africa is also likely to witness a sharp decline in productivity, loss of jobs and revenues to the pandemic.

    “As engines and drivers of economic growth, cities face considerable risks in light of COVID-19 with implications for the continent’s resilience to the pandemic,” said Thokozile Ruzvidzo director of the Gender, Poverty and Social Policy Division of the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

    “The effects are likely to be severe in urban areas. The urban economy [manufacturing and services] currently account for 64% of GDP in Africa,” said Ruzvidzo.

    Firms and businesses in African cities are highly vulnerable to COVID-19 related effects, especially SMEs which account for 80% of employment in Africa.

    “Additionally, urban consumption and expenditure [on food, manufactured goods, utilities, transport, energy, and services] are likely to experience a sharp fall in light of COVID-related lockdowns and reduced restrictions,” he said.

  • President Uhuru Speaks About Rent

    President Uhuru Speaks About Rent

    Coronavirus has destabilized the economy and many people have either lost their income with job cuts or have their salaries trimmed down as corporates struggle with the losses.

    Its not known how long this disaster will go and with only 40 days into it, things are already getting stiff for the majority. In Kenya, the informal sector makes up for 70% of the workforce meaning all those are the jobs lost.

    WHO is warning the the virus could further send underdeveloped countries into depression and deeper poverty.

    In Nairobi and other major towns in the country, rent has become one of the biggest challenges with many landlords threatening tenants with evictions over unpaid dues. It has often been expected from the government to offer a stimulus plan that would cushion tenants for instance from the wrath of the landlords whom on the other end have to deal with banks in paying their mortgages.

    While speaking on local radio stations on Wednesday, the President waded into the rent waiver debate, saying that the state respects private property and can only urge landlords to be humane by considering relief to tenants.

    This leaves the struggling tenants in the mercy of their landlords. It has been suggested elsewhere that the two parties can have an agreement to postpone the bills and pay on a later date when things return to normalcy. A bill in senate to address the issue of debt alongside other economic cushions is still in the table.

  • Turkana County To Spend Sh667 Million To Combat Covid 19 Pandemic

    Turkana County To Spend Sh667 Million To Combat Covid 19 Pandemic

    Speaker Erastus Lokaale on Monday told journalists that the county assembly had approved the supplementary budget 2 which allocated shs 667,570,600 towards covid 19 emergency response.

    Lokaale said he has forwarded the appropriation Bill to the Govenor for assent.

    He said the funds had been allocated to the ministries of water, health and public service and disaster management.

    The ministry of public service and disaster management would receive the lion’s share of shs 441, 231,000 to provide relief food to the vulnerable people.

    “We made this decision because the majority of our people are poor so we needed to cushion them during this crisis,” said Lokaale.

    Speaker of the county assembly Erastus Lokaale addressing the media on Monday April 20,2020
    Photo captions by Peter Gitonga

    The ministry of health was allocated shs 159,335,600 while the ministry of water was allocated shs 67 million.

    The speaker said funds for health docket would be used to purchase essential commodities like facemasks, and completion of the Lodwar county referral hospital intensive care unit as well as the purchase of ventilators and other equipment.

    Water was also identified as a key component and the funds would be used to enhance hygiene standards by ensuring boreholes are working and for water tankering in areas without water.

    To ensure accountability, the county assembly of Turkana has formed an adhoc Committee to oversight the utilisation of funds meant to address the covid 19 pandemic.

    Lokaale said hat the committee is keen to ensure that funds meant to fight the pandemic are not embezzled.

    “We understand that in times of crisis like these people can use the opportunity to do funny things that is why we are very keen to ensure funds are utilised to help the wananchi as intended,” said Lokaale.

    The ad-hoc committee which he leads includes deputy speaker Mike Ewoi, leader of majority Bethwel Kobongin, leader of minority Benedict Lokamar, Katilu MCA James Abei.

    The assembly Committee on finance will soon be meeting to discuss proposals from the executive including reducing cess for small scale traders during the crisis.
    Govenor Josphat Nanok last week said his government has come up with a raft of measures to protect the most affected by the corona virus crisis.

    He said that the County Treasury will waive a total of Sh40.7m from agricultural produce cess, water distribution and drill services, health sector fees, educational institutions, liquor licensing, market fees and single business permits for salons, barber shops and restaurant and entertainment facilities that is contained in the Turkana County Finance Amendment Bill 2020 as an additional measure to address COVID-19.

    The Governor has also directed a tax exemption on market collection fees in the months of April, May and June to cushion the citizens, both traders and household water users from the loss arising from COVID-19.

    Governor Nanok who was addressing the media with other County leaders at the new County HQ complex said that the County will clear eligible pending bills worth Sh90 Million within one month to “improve liquidity and ensure businesses remain operational.”

  • Investment Guru: Strong Dollar Won’t Survive The Coronavirus Pandemic

    Investment Guru: Strong Dollar Won’t Survive The Coronavirus Pandemic

    The U.S. dollar will not continue its current strength as both the government deficit and its monetary policies pose great dangers to the currency, a prominent international investor warned on Tuesday.

    “So far the dollar has been very strong against some currencies, up more than 20% this year, against the Brazilian real and Mexican pesos, but if you look at the fiscal deficit of the U.S. and all the money printing, I just can’t believe that it will continue to be strong,” Marc Faber, a Swiss investor said.

    The dollar could be strong for another 10 days or so, but in the long run, the U.S. monetary policies are dangerous and negative for the currency, he added.

    Saying that to date emerging markets have not rallied a great deal in the current crisis, he said there is a window of opportunity for the next two to three months to make some money in emerging markets, including in Turkey.

    Bankruptcies

    On the pandemic’s economic impact, Marc Faber said interventions by governments to stem the crisis will have serious effects.

    Western economies already faced serious problems before the virus hit, he said, and now with the coronavirus crisis things will get worse, he added.

    “The U.S. Fed started intervening in the repo market starting from September of last year. Then the coronavirus came and we had this huge intervention, monetary and fiscal measures,” he related.

    “That is cushioning the recession and depression, but I think after all the restrictions are lifted, a lot of businesses won’t be opening, a lot of people will go bankrupt and companies will default.”

    Stating that the global economy system will change drastically after the pandemic is under control, Faber said that airline revenues plunged 95%.

    He added that this situation will improve when international flight service resumes, but the previous high levels may be out of reach.

    Some people will think they no longer need to travel and would prefer to talk by video link rather than face-to-face visits with customers, he predicted.

    “People’s behavior will change,” he said

    Stating that economies in the wake of the virus will have new winners and losers, Faber said: “Platforms such as Amazon, Netflix, and Zoom have won. [Brick-and-mortar] retailers are losers.”

    “Some big retailers will never be able to open their shutters again,” he predicted.

  • Africa: The ‘New World Order’ – A Chance for Africa?

    Africa: The ‘New World Order’ – A Chance for Africa?

    GUEST COLUMN

    For decades, Africa has struggled to find its way in a process of globalization and being led by money powers with, as a consequence, an increasing widening of inequalities: more prosperity for a tiny minority and  more poverty for the greatest number.

    The world seems to be moving towards progressive dehumanization.  The achievement of man is no longer the major concern, but the strengthening of capital through an endless accumulation appears as the priority objective.

    Like a machine out of control, the world of men has run into a frantic race for more profit.  It is a race led by men who will themselves be forgotten at the end of each transformation process.

    Production is localized with the objective of seeking productivity and profitability gains.  Profit sites become the centers of creation of world wealth, a force for good which would be best shared for the greatest happiness of humanity.

    I wish through this reflection, and in these difficult times that cross all the nations, to challenge Africa, through its leaders and our Union (the African Union) through its members, to play as a continent in its own right.  I should say as an African Nation.

    At the moment when a new world is being built before our eyes, giving birth to a new world order, the Africa we love so much must be a leading player in this process.  I mean as an actor and not spectator.  United Africa should not only claim this place but also take charge of it if necessary!

    I would like to quote President Emmanuel Macron in his speech of April 13 “it is our responsibility to build solidarity today, new cooperations”.  I understand here the “responsibility” in the inclusive sense of the term (African leaders), because he had just spoken in other words marked by sincerity, of the need “to help Africa at the economic level with a massive cancelation of debt”.  This posture of President Macron is to be commended for its fair value.  It is up to African leaders to play their full role by speaking with one voice, that of Africa, the one that our youth expect.  With all the assets now in hand, we must not desert the youth who are watching us!

    Africa has it’s say in this new globalization, in this globalization of the economy.  Some silver lining!  The present and especially the coming times will certainly be among the saddest and perhaps the most heartbreaking in the history of mankind, but with great hope that a new world, full of hope and renewal will open up.  Humanity is seized with doubt, because of an invisible virus which is crossing the world to sow desolation. “Powerful” countries compete for leadership with poor countries every night at the announcement of the daily results and the gruesome ravages of the disease on a planetary scale.

    The gap between rich and poor countries is suddenly “bridged” because the consequence is the same for all rich and poor. The solution so far has not been found and the powerlessness of the people continues to assert itself every day.

    I said that Africa has a say, yes!  Africa has its say. Africa must act here and now, with full responsibility, taking its full place, relieved of this burden of an inferiority complex.  Africa will no longer have this alibi, after this period in the contemporary history of peoples, to make it clear that everything that happens to it is due to others … Africa is facing its destiny.  This is where the idea of an African Nation through all-African solidarity will make sense.

    Africa must think quickly and well.  It has the means, the skills and the support of friendly countries around some major non-limiting issues.

    1. What will be the place of our continent in this new global socio-economic governance with a model that until now has just shown its limits?  What governance at last will put the development of the HUMAN in the broad sense of the term at the heart of all concerns and not the development of the MAN in the individual sense.

    According to reports from the World Bank and OXFAM, it is mentioned that because of the novel coronavirus pandemic, Sub-Saharan Africa:

    • is moving towards its first recession in 25 years;

    • growth should retract between 2019 and 2020, going from 2.4% to a range between -2.1% and -5.1%;

    • the contraction of agricultural production will be between 2.6% and 7% (trade deadlock scenario) with losses between 37 and 79 billion dollars in 2020;

    • an unprecedented food crisis

    • a decline of 10 or even 30 years in the fight against poverty (OXFAM);

    • food imports will decrease by 13 to 25% (for countries which are not self-sufficient);

    • the disaster is that half a billion people could fall by the wayside

    The G20 has just met, with all due respect to the G20 authorities, I fear that this will be another missed appointment with “56% of the total of the extremely poor people in the world” According to the last report  World Bank Triennial on “Extreme Poverty in the World” the reorganization and the relaxation of the conditions of payment of the debt do not have the same scope as the cancellation of the debt.

    Faced with such an apocalyptic scheme, Africa expected from the G20 a bolder, unequivocal response to support the BUDGETARY effort of the States.  Several researchers and analysts have said this.  World Bank Vice President Hafez Ghanem calls official bilateral creditors to a debt service moratorium … to free up cash … and save lives.  I would say that you must dare to go further, towards debt cancellation as suggested by President Macky Sall alongside other African leaders, and as President Macron has just reiterated, so as not to be in a perpetual flight forward which will sooner or later overtake us.  We all know that the response to such a crisis can no longer be solely budgetary, whatever the will of the States.  Liquidity must be injected into the economies to support not only households in difficulty, but also businesses and the informal sector.  The informal sector in Africa, known to all, is one of the most important pillars in the fight against poverty in view of the structure of our social model.

    If we want to restart the African economy in conditions of true resilience, all intellectuals know that canceling the debt is the ONLY ALTERNATIVE.  The Bretton Woods institutions (like the G20, moreover) should not set us on a different path by relying on all the instruments at their disposal.

    This is why I welcome the initiative taken on April 13, 2020, by the IMF Board of Directors with debt relief for 25 countries, including 6 WAEMU countries, even if it remains insufficient (six months) pending the initiative launched to find the resources to complete for the next two years.  I question myself, however, on reading the full list of beneficiaries, and taking into account the time horizon (2 years), on the exclusion of Côte d’Ivoire and Senegal, for an initiative that wants to provide “subsidies to our poorest and most vulnerable members to cover their debts to the IMF”.  Let us hope that this exclusion will only concern the first 6 months at the risk of seeing a technical and democratic debate take place around the relevance of this decision.

    I do not deny the efforts made by the IMF in Senegal through the instruments which are the Rapid Facility Instrument (IFR) and the Rapid Credit Facility (FCR) for nearly 277 billion.  However, lightening is not synonymous with indebtedness even on milder and less restrictive conditions in the provision.  The objective is not only to contain the shock, but to review the profile and the weight of the debt on our economies.  This will free up spaces in the hope of a real resilience of our weak economies to the resumption of economic activity.

    Africa in general and the WAEMU countries in particular, today need a massive injection of liquidity, even with the risk of freeing up inflation in a responsible way, to support the productive sectors within the framework of activities.  We should take advantage of this to bring our health care system, that of education and RESEARCH, which we often tend to neglect to the point of pushing our researchers to expatriation.  Some countries were unable to provide emergency services (if any) with a minimum of respirators, masks and protective clothing for medical personnel, when orders in the north were made by the thousands.  I salute in passing the great sacrifice and highly civic behavior of the health personnel who worked in disastrous conditions to manage this pandemic.  These people who gave their lives to save that of others (in all countries of the world) deserve beyond the decorations (if they have any) to be cited as martyrs.

    Africa and the world in general expect us to review this model of globalization which everyone knows has reached its limits.  And the most striking demonstration was given by the absence of immediate, coordinated and united responses to some of the most basic requests to fight this pandemic …… with the impossibility of satisfying urgent requests because excessive (regional) centralization of production by profit centers.  The consequence was an indescribable cacophony and an unprecedented state selfishness in the face of the suffering next door, despite all the supposed “benefits” of globalization that we have always been praised for.

    For more justice, this economy integrated by globalization can no longer be a corridor arranged so that the search for prosperity for the smallest number is the only objective, even an unconscious one.

    Profit centers should no longer be concentrated in a single region for the greatest benefit of the greatest number.

    2.  We need a new link with the Bretton Woods institutions to make their mode of intervention in the “weakest Nations” a little more flexible.

    IMF initiatives such as IFR and FCR are to be welcomed.

    The convergence criteria have been put to the test.  The dogmatism of the budget deficit at 3%, inflation at less than 3% in economies like ours, where we are under construction, faced with emergencies every day must remain the same even if we know, that faced with the crisis, the noose is a bit loose around the budget deficit.  Even if we know, the tempering effort of interest rates will certainly stimulate demand and keep businesses in a situation of controlled risk.

    3.  What new directions can we give to the United Nations specialized agencies for greater responsiveness even if we can give them the benefit of the doubt because of the spontaneity (suddenness) and the scale of the crisis.

    A great deal of reflection must be carried out in this direction with far-reaching reforms on the side of the institutions, but also of the States, so that the latter, in the event of a divergence of interests for the benefit of the greatest number, that they have the latitude to suspend their State party obligation.

    4. Finally, we must pursue relationships of genuine friendship with the “Great Nations” by dismissing (putting on hold) the adage that “the Nations have no friends but only interests”.

    Cheike Hadjibou Soumare is former Prime Minister of Senegal and former president of the WAEMU Commission

    This article originally appeared on AllAfrica.

  • Senator Wants China To Pay $100 Billion For Destroying The Kenyan Economy With Covid-19

    Senator Wants China To Pay $100 Billion For Destroying The Kenyan Economy With Covid-19

    Germany is currently trending after a newspaper sent a letter to China and in it demanding a compensation of $162 billion over the destruction caused by the virus.

    The later put blame on China for not acting fast enough to curb the spread and lack of openness. The virus that originated in Wuhan, China has now clocked 2 million mark of infected people globally.

    In Kenya, the virus has now infected 254 people and 14 already dead with numbers projected to accelerate in the coming weeks and months.

    Currently, the country is in a partial lockdown with movements restricted outside designated areas. The country is still observing the curfew and many people are either now working from home or jobless.

    Tourism industry has been dealt a big blow and nearly all hotels have been shut. It’s not just that, key economic pillars have been frozen and country crawling to a halt.

    With many countries now blaming China for the mess caused by the coronavirus, Narok County Senator, Ledama Olekina now wants the Chinese government held responsible and billed for it. “This COVID19 is expensive someone must pay for it! Kenya has lost over $ 1.2b in tourism revenue, $2B in diaspora remittances, the NSE has tumbled. Our entire economy has shrunk and someone must pay for it! StateHouseKenya please send a bill of $100B to China to pay!” He said.

    ”Can’t sleep thinking about how life has changed, thousands of SMS’s asking for rent money, food money for the day and we continue entertaining this Chinese Mess? I agree with @realDonaldTrump the Chinese must pay! No gym just getting FAT! Hapana!” He continued.

  • How Safe Are Covid-19 Testing Kits Coming To Africa As European Countries Flag Coronavirus Contaminated Supplies From China

    How Safe Are Covid-19 Testing Kits Coming To Africa As European Countries Flag Coronavirus Contaminated Supplies From China

    Having been declared a pandemic, Covid19 is giving countries sleepless nights. It happens that China is the large if not the only country supplying the world with medical supplies from testing kits, PPEs and other remedial medicines for the coronavirus.

    As countries rush against time to prevent catastrophic deaths, there’s yet another huddle, quality and accuracy of the Covid19 testing kits. As a curbing measure, governments are embarking on mass testing and isolation of infected to cut the spread chain.

    In a most shocking development, several countries have reported that testing kits, protective equipment and medical devices sent to them to combat COVID-19 were itself found to be contaminated with Coronavirus. Meanwhile, in the US the lab authorized to make coronavirus testing kits itself was found to be contaminated with coronavirus. As secret services have launched a worldwide Intelligence War over Coronavirus related medical supplies, the widespread contamination of the coronavirus testing kits poses a serious concern.

    Last week, the UK disclosed that key components of the coronavirus testing kit the UK government had ordered from China were contaminated with the coronavirus itself! On Monday, the 30th of March, 2020, laboratories across UK were warned that there would be a delay in the delivery of “probes and primers.”

    It was reported that the testing kits were sent from China and were found to be contaminated with the coronavirus when they were being surveyed by a Luxembourg-based company, Eurofins Scientific.

    Eurofins admitted to the contamination saying, “We are aware that contaminations of the nature you mentioned have been observed by several primers and probes manufacturers around the world after they produced SARS-COV2 positive controls. ‘Those initial problems can be easily resolved by proper cleaning and production segregation procedures.” A positive control enables assessment of new test’s ability to detect a disease.

    In was in its February 2019 annual report, that Eurofin Scientific’s CEO Gilles G. Martin claimed, that the firm was already capable of handling coronavirus-stricken operations. “Eurofins food testing laboratories in China have already developed testing methods for SARS 2-CoV to help manufacturers resume their business activities.” He also spoke of how criminal cyber-attacks hit many of the Company’s laboratories in June of 2019.

    Why isn’t Eurofins being ratted out for such a horrific gaffe? The Company sent testing kits contaminated with coronavirus! Why aren’t its officials being taken in custody and questioned at the highest levels for putting millions of lives in danger?

    The curious case of undisclosed Contamination in US lab

    In early March, 2020, a senior federal scientist in America and the country’s Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued shocking statements disclosing that the Atlanta laboratory of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) authorized to make the coronavirus testing kits was itself found to be contaminated. The background to this being that although the WHO had shipped its coronavirus testing kits worldwide to 57 other countries, the U.S. had decided to make its own.

    Timothy Stenzel, the Director of the CDC office of In Vitro Diagnostics and Radiological Health, was sent to the Atlanta lab on Feb 22 to help coordinate the administration’s coronavirus response. Surprisingly, the test specialist was stopped at CDC’s door and made to wait overnight, two individuals with knowledge of the episode told POLITICO. The scientist was granted permission to be on campus only after senior health department officials negotiated his access in a series of calls.

    After the episode, Stenzel found evidence that the lab was contaminated with coronavirus and reported it to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It is unclear which senior health officials, at which agencies, knew about the CDC contamination and when they learned of them. HHS has convened a team of scientists from outside the CDC and launched an investigation into the matter.

    The Race for Medical Equipment

    Governments worldwide are geared up in a massive race for medical diagnostics, testing kits, treatment and vaccination efforts. Governments are engaging in covert intelligence operations related to coronavirus at the highest levels in the race to procure protective equipment and gear, called PPE (Protective Equipment Personal) in medical parlance, which are in great shortage.

    Such an evidently nightmarish situation, finding the coronavirus testing kits themselves contaminated with coronavirus in countries such as the U.S. and UK, raises many questions about not just the specific instance of sourcing, but the bigger geopolitical war-games being played out at an international level.

    In June of 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) constituted an emergency committee of undisclosed individuals and declared the H1N1 outbreak a “pandemic,” which triggered Buy clauses on vaccination products from various developed countries. These purchases turned out to be not so necessary in the countries making the initial purchases, but fell short in countries which were most affected and couldn’t purchase them in time, resulting in soaring profits for vaccine makers – all down to the machinations of certain undisclosed decision makers!

    Government officials at JKIA to receive medical supplies from China.

    In Canada, a similar story emanates, Thousands of kits meant to screen for COVID-19 delivered to New Brunswick from a supplier in China were contaminated and can’t be used at this point.

    With endless red flags, Beijing is stepping up its oversight of exports of coronavirus test kits after several European countries complained about the accuracy of some Chinese-made tests.

    Chinese exporters of coronavirus tests must now obtain a registration certificate from the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) in order to be cleared by China’s customs, the NMPA said in a statement late on Tuesday.

    Beijing had been encouraging Chinese firms to export test kits and other supplies to help battle the coronavirus pandemic, leading to a surge of companies offering kits to countries desperate to get a handle on the fast-moving and highly contagious disease.

    Some Chinese test kit makers had been taking advantage of easier European Union regulations to get their products into the market before they were approved at home.

    In March, Lei Chaozi, an official with the Ministry of Education, said China-made testing kits had already been supplied to 11 countries, including the UK, Italy and the Netherlands.

    But the accuracy of some Chinese tests marketed overseas without Chinese approval have been questioned by European health authorities.

    Spain withdrew a batch of rapid tests manufactured by Chinese diagnostics firm Shenzhen Bioeasy Biotechnology after the product was found to have low sensitivity, which means they were unable to detect infection sufficiently.

    Bioeasy said in a statement that the inaccurate readings could be because samples were not collected and processed correctly. Bioeasy said it failed to adequately communicate with clients on how to use the test.

    Separately, a spokeswoman from China’s foreign ministry said last week that Slovak government officials had questioned the reliability of rapid tests purchased from China.

    The preliminary conclusion from the Chinese consulate in Slovakia was that the inaccuracies were the result of medical workers using the kit incorrectly, the spokeswoman said.

    ANTIGEN TESTS

    Bioeasy’s rapid tests, as well as the tests questioned by Slovak officials, are antigen tests, a method that targets the virus’ protein to detect infection and can deliver results more quickly than the alternative nucleic acid method.

    But antigen tests require higher level of virus load and therefore could fail to diagnose people correctly when the samples only contain small amount of virus, Dr. Chen Guangjie, an immunology professor at Shanghai Jiaotong University, told Reuters.

    New coronavirus test makers in China are entering the European market during a transition between two regulatory systems.

    A stricter rule will come into force in 2022 that will require many infectious disease diagnostic product manufacturers to follow procedures that can take up to a year or more to get a CE mark that indicates approval to be legally sold in European countries.

    Current regulations used by several Chinese companies allow manufacturers to obtain CE Mark after submitting a dossier of documents without compulsory verification by authorized third-parties.

    Now, China’s tightened scrutiny is interrupting test manufacturers’ overseas expansion plans.

    Xi’an Tianlong Science and Technology, a Chinese firm which received the CE Mark in March and has been in the process of churning out testing reagents that can supply tests for over one million people, told Reuters it now can’t meet its export orders.

    “Our reagents don’t have (NMPA) certificate and cannot be exported,” the company’s marketing director Feng Zhenzhen said, adding the firm is “actively” applying for Chinese regulator’s approval.

    Jam Chan, marketing general manager at Osmunda, a service firm that advises Chinese medical product firms on getting overseas approvals, said many recently developed tests in China haven’t gone through strict clinical trials, which means the self-declared accuracy rate printed on the products is not properly validated.

    “Better not exporting products than offering inaccurate products that can lead to fake results,” said Chan. “The quality of products that have been through domestic review before being exported is at least guaranteed to some extent.”

    The Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC) plans to distribute one million COVID-19 test kits from next week to help countries across the continent address a testing shortfall, according to the director of the African Union body.

    Official figures show that Africa has so far been hit less hard than other continents by COVID-19, the disease caused by the new coronavirus, with 911 known deaths and 3,546 registered recoveries among 17,247 confirmed cases.

    But limited testing in many countries has deprived African officials of a full picture of the disease’s spread.

    Nigeria, with nearly 200 million people, has conducted about 6,000 tests, while Ethiopia, with more than 100 million people, has conducted about 5,000, Kenya with 45M has conducted 10,000 tests.

    Health officials in various parts of the continent are also trying to assess equipment needs.

    While South Africa has about 1,500 ventilators – breathing machines that can be essential to saving patients in serious COVID-19 cases – there are 10 countries in Africa that have none at all.

    The World Health Organization has said fewer than 5,000 intensive care unit beds are available across 43 of the continent’s 54 countries, noting “This is about five beds per one million people in the reported countries compared to 4,000 beds per one million people in Europe.”

    Last week, African Union officials said countries on the continent are struggling to compete with wealthier states for testing kits and other equipment necessary to curb the spread of the coronavirus.

    In the backdrop of these developments, a question that is not getting an answer is just how safe and accurate are the kits coming to Africa are? Could Africa get a better deal than the duped European countries or shall be served with garbage? There’s no African government that has flagged any supply yet.

    “Two Companies from China sold fake COVID-19 test kit to UK for us£20m (Kshs. 2.12Billion). Recuperating PM Boris Johnson who had praised the kit is beyond embarrassed. Even Gov’ts like UK with world class scientists can be conned. Imagine miserable Africa.” Kenyan Lawyer Donald Kipkorir opined.

    Widespread testing—which even the United States has so far failed to implement—may well prove impossible for many African countries. Alternate strategies, such as social distancing, where possible, or restrictions on travel between urban and rural areas, and across national borders, may ultimately prove more effective in limiting the spread of COVID-19 across the population. Even if supply bottlenecks can be overcome—which would allow many African countries to exploit the existing expertise in contact tracing that has been developed during previous Ebola outbreaks—barriers to the distribution of test kits may prove too high.

    Additional reporting by Reuters.