Category: News

  • Former Employees Lodge Petition with JSC Seeking Removal of ELRC Judge Christine Noontatua Baari Over Alleged Bias and Incompetence in Redundancy Ruling

    Former Employees Lodge Petition with JSC Seeking Removal of ELRC Judge Christine Noontatua Baari Over Alleged Bias and Incompetence in Redundancy Ruling

    Nairobi, November 19, 2025 – A group of 16 former employees of Jumuia Hospitals Limited, operated under the National Council of Churches of Kenya (NCCK), has filed a formal petition with the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) demanding the removal of Hon. Lady Justice Christine Noontatua Baari from the Employment and Labour Relations Court (ELRC).

    The petition, dated November 17, 2025, and stamped as received by the JSC on November 18, 2025, accuses Justice Baari of incompetence, bias, gross misconduct, and serious violations of the Constitution in her handling of a high-profile redundancy case. The petitioners, led by Dr. Margaret Migiro and represented by Midenga & Company Advocates, argue that the judge’s conduct undermines public confidence in the judiciary and contravenes Chapter Six of the Constitution on leadership and integrity.

    At the heart of the complaint is ELRC Cause No. E175 of 2021: Dr. Margaret Migiro Mbaabu & 15 Others v Registered Trustees of the National Council of Churches of Kenya & Jumuia Hospitals Limited. The claimants, declared redundant in 2020 amid financial constraints at Jumuia Hospitals, challenged the termination as unfair and unlawful. They explicitly sought compensation for unlawful and unfair declaration of redundancy in their 2021 Memorandum of Claim.

    However, in a judgment delivered on October 30, 2025, Justice Baari ruled that while the redundancy process lacked proper justification and procedural fairness under Section 40 of the Employment Act, the claimants were bound by their pleadings and could not be awarded damages or compensation because they had not specifically prayed for it in the main suit. The judge noted in paragraph 65: “It is also safe to mention that though the Claimants asked the court to declare their termination by redundancy unfair, they did not proceed to seek damages/compensation for the unfair termination… this court will be in error to award that which was not prayed for.”

    The petitioners describe this finding as “extremely baffling and appalling,” insisting that their prayer for compensation was unambiguous and that the judge deliberately ignored it to produce a “cosmetic” outcome that shielded the NCCK from accountability. They further allege that Justice Baari overlooked other unaddressed prayers, such as withheld salaries and issuance of certificates of service, and failed to apply Section 49 of the Employment Act, which mandates compensation for wrongful or unfair termination.

    Additional grounds include claims that the judge showed bias by refusing to allow the claimants’ counsel to address the court immediately after judgment delivery, instead suggesting an appeal—a move the petitioners say reeks of compromise and an attempt to cover up flaws in the ruling. They contend that her actions eroded judicial independence, contravened Article 73(2) on objectivity and impartiality, and violated the Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct.

    The petitioners, who include medical professionals and support staff, say the ruling has left them victims of injustice, denied meaningful redress despite the court’s acknowledgment of procedural lapses by their former employer. One petitioner was reportedly awarded only KSh 10,000, described as derisory.

    Under Article 168 of the Constitution, the JSC must now review whether the petition discloses sufficient grounds for removal—such as incompetence, bias, gross misconduct, or constitutional violations—before potentially forwarding it to the President for the formation of a tribunal.

    Justice Baari, appointed to the ELRC in 2021 and stationed in Nairobi (with prior postings including Kisumu), has not responded publicly to the allegations. The JSC, which treats such petitions confidentially during initial review, has not issued a statement on the matter.

    This petition adds to a growing list of judicial accountability cases in Kenya, highlighting tensions between litigants’ expectations and strict adherence to pleadings in employment disputes. Legal experts note that while courts are bound by prayers sought, critics argue such rigid interpretations can deny substantive justice in labour matters.

  • MPs Sound Alarm as Sh12.6 Billion Hustler Fund Faces Total Loss

    MPs Sound Alarm as Sh12.6 Billion Hustler Fund Faces Total Loss

    A brewing financial scandal has engulfed Parliament as legislators raise red flags over the possible loss of Sh12.6 billion in taxpayers’ money advanced through the controversial Hustler Fund programme, with demands now mounting for a special audit to uncover what happened to the cash.

    In explosive revelations before the Special Funds Accounts Committee of the National Assembly, Hustler Fund CEO Henry Tanui admitted that of the Sh14 billion allocated to the fund, a paltry Sh1.4 billion remains in circulation, leaving MPs stunned and questioning whether the remaining Sh12.6 billion has vanished into thin air.

    The shocking disclosure has triggered panic among lawmakers who fear the massive sum, enough to construct 12 kilometres of highway or educate 566,000 secondary school students for a year, may never be recovered from borrowers who have simply disappeared after taking loans.

    “Let’s just call a spade a spade. If the Treasury has allocated you Sh14 billion so far and only Sh1.4 billion is revolving, then we can say that the money is lost,” declared Mwingi West MP Charles Nguna, his voice heavy with frustration during the heated committee session.

    The mood in the committee room turned hostile as MPs watched the Hustler Fund boss fumble through explanations, failing to provide basic documentation on who borrowed the billions and whether any realistic hope exists of getting the money back.

    Committee chairperson Fatuma Mohammed, the Migori Woman Representative, didn’t mince words in her assessment of the CEO’s performance.

    “Appearing here with no query answered is a mockery to the committee. This is an oversight committee. When you say no money was lost, I think you do not live in this country,” she thundered, her exasperation evident as Tanui offered vague assurances without concrete evidence.

    The situation appears far worse than initially thought. MPs heard disturbing accounts of Kenyans who deliberately gamed the system, registering new phone lines to access loans with absolutely no intention of ever repaying a single shilling.

    “I personally know of people who registered new lines to access the loans but they have since blocked the numbers and don’t plan on repaying the same,” MP Nguna revealed, painting a picture of systematic fraud that the government appears powerless to stop.

    North Imenti MP Rahim Dawood went further, directly accusing the fund’s management of misappropriation and suggesting that the frequent changes in leadership at the fund are a deliberate strategy to hide wrongdoing from investigators.

    “The press even reports that of the people who took the loans of the Hustler Fund, many are not known, and cannot be followed up. That’s why I say this money has been misappropriated. It has been lost. And if you cannot recover it, what is the point?” Dawood demanded, his questions hanging unanswered in the tense atmosphere.

    The second-term legislator has now called for Auditor-General Nancy Gathungu to launch a special forensic audit of the entire Hustler Fund operation, a move that could expose what many MPs privately believe is one of the biggest financial disasters in recent government history.

    “If you only have Sh1.4 billion rotating, do you have the other Sh12 billion in your accounts? Because it seems the Hustler Fund, to hide things, removes people from the office. After three or six months, you will be gone, and somebody else will come. And I think that is what is happening,” Dawood charged, suggesting a pattern of cover-ups.

    Despite the mounting evidence of disaster, CEO Tanui maintained an increasingly unconvincing defence, insisting that borrowed money is not stolen money and that recovery mechanisms are in place, though he conspicuously failed to detail what those mechanisms actually are.

    “Members, money borrowed is not money stolen. Some of these funds are with your constituents and what I have done is put in place measures to recoup the money,” Tanui claimed, but his words rang hollow as MPs pressed him for specifics he couldn’t provide.

    The CEO’s claim that all borrowers are registered using their identity card numbers and can be traced did little to calm the storm, particularly when he admitted he was too new in office to provide the documents MPs had repeatedly requested showing exactly who borrowed what.

    The committee has now summoned Cooperatives and MSMEs Cabinet Secretary Wycliffe Oparanya and Principal Secretary Susan Mangeni to personally account for the fund’s operations, a development that signals Parliament’s loss of confidence in lower-level officials to explain the crisis.

    The timing of this scandal couldn’t be worse for ordinary Kenyans already reeling from economic hardship. The Sh12.6 billion that may be lost forever represents resources desperately needed elsewhere, from schools facing capitation funding crises to infrastructure projects that could create thousands of jobs.

    A recent report by the Kenya Human Rights Commission labelled the Hustler Fund as structurally flawed, economically unsound, and a politically motivated initiative that has catastrophically failed to empower the citizens it was meant to uplift, lending credibility to MPs’ worst fears.

    As the investigation deepens, one question haunts the corridors of Parliament: how did a government programme meant to help struggling Kenyans turn into what increasingly looks like a Sh12.6 billion black hole of missing taxpayer money, and will anyone be held accountable for this potential disaster?

    The committee has given officials seven days to produce complete documentation of all borrowers, their contacts, and identification details.

    What those documents reveal, or fail to reveal, could determine whether this scandal becomes the defining financial catastrophe of the current administration.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Fake Arms Dealer Aarif Gani Charged After Conning Father in Sh300,000 Firearm Licence Scam

    Fake Arms Dealer Aarif Gani Charged After Conning Father in Sh300,000 Firearm Licence Scam

    A Nairobi businessman who posed as a high-level fixer with inside access to Kenya’s gun-licensing system has been charged with fraud after allegedly swindling a father of Sh300,000 in a fake firearm certificate deal that investigators say was “a textbook con.”

    Aarif Ibrahim Gani was arraigned before the Milimani Law Courts after detectives from the Operation Support Unit (OSU) concluded months-long investigations into what they believe is part of a rising wave of firearm-related fraud targeting desperate applicants frustrated by Kenya’s slow and highly guarded licensing process.

    According to the Directorate of Criminal Investigations, Gani—working with an accomplice still at large—approached the complainant in December 2024, claiming he had powerful connections at the Firearms Licensing Board (FLB) and could secure a firearm certificate for the victim’s son “within weeks.”

    To reinforce the illusion, detectives say the suspect spun a narrative involving senior security officials and implied he could bypass the board’s notoriously strict vetting procedure.

    Over the next three months, the victim made deposits totalling Sh300,000, believing the money was being used for “processing fees” and “expedited approvals.”

    But when no licence materialised, Gani allegedly produced a forged FLB letter, claiming the Board was undergoing “technical upgrades to its system,” and asked for more time.

    Investigators now say the letter was fabricated to prolong the scam and prevent the victim from raising alarm.

    Sources familiar with firearms vetting procedures told this publication that the FLB has recently been dealing with a surge in impersonation cases, with fraudsters exploiting applicants’ frustration and lack of information.

    The Board has repeatedly warned that no individual—no matter how well-connected—can influence the issuance of a firearm certificate, which involves multi-agency background checks, psychological screening, and verification by security units.

    Gani was arrested earlier this week after the victim finally reported the matter to police.

    He has been charged with conspiracy to defraud and obtaining money by false pretences.

    He pleaded not guilty and was released on a Sh100,000 cash bail with one contact person.

    Investigators confirmed that the hunt for his accomplice is still underway and that more victims may come forward, as the suspects are believed to have targeted individuals seeking to obtain firearms for personal security amid rising crime concerns.

    The case will be mentioned on December 15, 2025, as prosecutors move to secure evidence including digital communications, bank records, and the forged letter allegedly used in the scheme.

  • Anti-Counterfeit Boss Josphat Kabeabea Charged With Soliciting Bribes From Investors

    Anti-Counterfeit Boss Josphat Kabeabea Charged With Soliciting Bribes From Investors

    In a spectacular fall from grace that has sent shockwaves through Kenya’s anti-corruption circles, the very man entrusted to protect businesses from counterfeit traders now stands accused of becoming a predator himself, allegedly demanding millions in bribes from the very investors he was supposed to regulate.

    Josphat Gichunge Kabeabea, the Chairman of the Anti-Counterfeit Authority, appeared at Milimani Anti-Corruption Court on Monday to face explosive charges that he solicited a Sh5 million bribe from Chinese businessman Du Zhisheng in exchange for turning a blind eye to alleged counterfeit motor vehicle spare parts operations.

    The dramatic courtroom appearance of the former Tigania East Member of Parliament marked the culmination of a swift investigation by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission that began with dawn raids on his residence and offices just days earlier.

    EACC detectives descended on Kabeabea’s properties on November 14 after securing court orders, hauling him to the Integrity Centre for interrogation over allegations that paint a disturbing picture of corruption at the highest levels of Kenya’s regulatory machinery.

    But this wasn’t just any bribery case. The prosecution’s narrative reads like a thriller of desperation and greed. According to EACC investigators, what started as a brazen Sh5 million demand on November 11 descended into a haggling session worthy of a street market, with Kabeabea allegedly slashing his price three times, first to Sh1 million, then Sh300,000, before finally settling at Sh144,500.

    The alleged shakedown played out like a scene from a crime drama. Kabeabea allegedly stormed into Hongda Automotive Limited’s premises, accused the Chinese national of dealing in counterfeit goods, threatened him with arrest and detention, then allegedly offered salvation for a price. When the businessman protested that he had no cash on hand, Kabeabea allegedly provided a mobile phone number registered to his personal driver to receive the payment. The money was duly transferred, digital breadcrumbs that would ultimately lead investigators straight to the ACA boss.

    CCTV footage obtained by EACC investigators confirmed that Kabeabea visited the Chinese businessman’s company premises on both November 10 and 11, undermining any claims that he was unfamiliar with the operation.

    But here’s where the story gets even more explosive. This wasn’t Kabeabea’s first alleged rodeo. In a separate incident just weeks earlier in October, he allegedly demanded Sh10 million from another company called UNIPRO Limited and received Sh8 million after threatening to brand them counterfeit dealers. The pattern was chillingly similar: accuse, threaten, extract payment.

    The man now in the dock was once a respected figure in Kenya’s political establishment. Kabeabea served as Member of Parliament for Tigania East from 2017 to 2022 and sat on the Departmental Committee on Lands.

    His appointment to chair the Anti-Counterfeit Authority was supposed to represent a new chapter, a chance to serve the public good. Instead, prosecutors allege he turned the position into a personal ATM.

    The charges against him are devastating. He faces five counts including receiving bribes contrary to Section 6(1)(a) of the Anti-Bribery Act and acquisition of proceeds of crime under the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act. If convicted, Kabeabea faces up to 14 years imprisonment under the money laundering laws, or a fine of Sh5 million or the value of the property involved, whichever is higher. The Anti-Bribery Act provides for up to ten years behind bars and a mandatory fine equal to five times the benefit obtained.

    Standing before Senior Principal Magistrate Celesa Okore, Kabeabea pleaded not guilty to all charges, maintaining his innocence even as State counsel Wesley Nyamache laid bare the prosecution’s case.

    The court released him on a Sh2 million bond with one surety of equal amount or an alternative cash bail of Sh1 million. He was barred from contacting witnesses as the case inches toward trial.

    The irony is almost too bitter to swallow. The Anti-Counterfeit Authority was established to be Kenya’s shield against fake goods flooding the market, protecting consumers and legitimate businesses alike. Now its leader stands accused of weaponizing that very mandate, allegedly turning counterfeit accusations into a lucrative extortion racket that preyed on the fears of foreign investors trying to do business in Kenya.

    The Director of Public Prosecutions conducted a comprehensive review of the EACC’s inquiry file and concluded that the evidence sufficiently disclosed the essential elements of the bribery offense. The wheels of justice are now in motion, and Kabeabea’s next court appearance in two weeks will set the stage for what promises to be one of Kenya’s most closely watched corruption trials.

    For Du Zhisheng and the other alleged victims, the question remains: how many other businesses were shaken down before someone finally said no and reported the alleged shakedown? And for Kenya’s ongoing war against corruption, Kabeabea’s case serves as a grim reminder that sometimes the biggest threat comes not from outside criminals, but from those sitting in the very offices meant to protect the public trust.

    The case continues.

  • EACC Audit Exposes Police Extortion Empire: Senior Commanders Set Daily Bribe Targets for Officers

    EACC Audit Exposes Police Extortion Empire: Senior Commanders Set Daily Bribe Targets for Officers

    A damning audit by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has exposed a fully structured bribery empire within the National Police Service where senior commanders allegedly set daily and weekly bribe targets for junior officers, turning traffic policing into a cash-collection industry that rivals organized crime.

    The report, commissioned by Inspector General Douglas Kanja, reveals that bribery within the traffic unit is not opportunistic but institutionalized.

    Officers are given explicit cash targets to collect from public service vehicles, boda boda riders and bar owners. Commanders reportedly monitor these targets with the same precision that legitimate agencies use to track revenue performance.

    The Ngong Road corridor is one of the most lucrative routes.

    Matatu operators told auditors that each vehicle is forced to pay one thousand shillings per week as protection fees.

    With about two hundred vehicles operating on the route, the police collect two hundred thousand shillings weekly and more than eight hundred thousand shillings monthly from one road alone.

    Boda boda riders face similar extortion, while bar owners report up to four collections per day.

    Failure to pay unleashes immediate retaliation.

    Vehicles are impounded, drivers accused of fabricated offences and owners subjected to relentless harassment.sa

    Officers who refuse to participate in the racket are punished just as harshly.

    The report documents sudden transfers to remote hardship stations, trumped-up disciplinary charges and stalled promotions for officers who fail to deliver cash.

    The audit uncovers a sophisticated financial system behind the bribery network.

    Illegal collections are often funneled through police SACCOs and disguised using multiple receipt books and parallel records.

    Some officers were found operating in unauthorized roles to increase access to high-traffic extortion points. EACC investigators concluded that bribery proceeds climb through the police hierarchy, benefiting supervisors and senior commanders who control deployment.

    The report also paints the picture of a service collapsing under internal dysfunction. Kenya is short by nearly two hundred thousand officers, leaving key oversight organs crippled.

    The Internal Affairs Unit, which should police rogue officers, has only seventy-four personnel instead of more than a thousand. This vacuum has allowed corruption networks to thrive without fear of detection or discipline.

    The audit’s release comes under the cloud of the death of teacher and blogger Albert Ojwang, who died in police custody in July 2025 after being arrested for allegedly defaming a senior police commander he had linked to corruption networks. Although the audit does not directly tie his death to the extortion racket, the timing has fueled suspicion of cover-ups and intimidation within the service.

    Inspector General Kanja’s role in initiating the audit has drawn both praise and scrutiny.

    He has pledged to discipline officers involved, establish anti-corruption committees in all counties and fast-track digitization of police processes including recruitment, cash bail and administrative records. He is also considering introducing body cameras to curb abuse.

    The EACC, however, says the rot is too deep to fix through incremental reforms. It has recommended the disbandment of the entire traffic department, routine rotation of officers and a complete restructuring of deployment systems to break entrenched extortion networks. Auditors warn that unless these measures are taken urgently, the police service will continue to function as a predatory revenue machine rather than a law-enforcement institution.

    The findings expose a policing crisis that threatens public safety and erodes public trust.

    With officers focused on collecting bribes instead of enforcing traffic laws, unroadworthy vehicles and reckless drivers are allowed to operate freely, putting millions at risk.

    The report concludes that corruption has become so systemic that without decisive action, the police service risks losing all legitimacy.

  • MP Aladwa and Children Implicated in Sh63 Million Buruburu Public Land Grab Scandal

    MP Aladwa and Children Implicated in Sh63 Million Buruburu Public Land Grab Scandal

    MP George Aladwa has once again been thrown into the eye of a storm, this time over a Sh63 million public plot in Buruburu that anti-graft detectives say was quietly snatched from residents and handed to a company linked to him and his close associates.

    What is emerging is a story of land meant for children’s playgrounds and community use morphing into private real estate overnight, pushed through by shadowy paperwork and suspiciously convenient transfers.

    The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has gone to court seeking to rip the land back from Julgem Communication Services Ltd, a firm investigators say is tied to the vocal Makadara MP.

    According to court documents, the Buruburu Phase 5 parcel was never supposed to land in private hands. It had been reserved decades ago as an open space under the Nairobi City Council and was therefore not available for allocation to anyone. Yet in 2010, the land suddenly appeared under the name of Fatuma Mohammed, who was neither issued an allotment letter nor cleared through any approved development plan. A lease was magically created for her on the same day a suspicious green card was opened. 

    Two years later, she transferred the land to Julgem for just Sh1 million, a fraction of its value even then, and a fresh certificate of lease was prepared instantly. At the time, Aladwa was not just a political heavyweight in Makadara but had just ascended to Nairobi’s mayoral seat, giving him enormous influence over City Hall’s land registries. Investigators believe the transfer was engineered to give a veneer of legitimacy to an already doctored ownership chain. Once Julgem secured the property, it was swiftly charged at Bunge Sacco for a Sh22.3 million loan, raising further questions about whether the land was being used as collateral for private financing schemes based on a fraudulent title. 

    EACC now says the entire ownership trail is rotten. There is no original allotment letter, no trace of a legal lease, and no presidential or council approval for alienating a public utility. The commission bluntly calls the acquisition fraudulent, illegal and a textbook example of how public land disappears in Nairobi. A judge has already frozen any attempt to sell or transfer the land as the MP, the company, and other respondents wait to answer to the accusations. They have 21 days to file responses before the case comes up again in December. 

    But the saga doesn’t end with Aladwa’s case. The commission has also uncovered a separate Sh70 million land grab in the same estate where a nursery school plot was quietly diverted to private hands. The trend paints a grim picture of Buruburu, one of Nairobi’s oldest estates, now battling wave after wave of land theft even as residents watch their open spaces, playgrounds, and community centres disappear into private titles overnight. 

    For Aladwa, already a fiery political figure and ODM’s Nairobi branch chair, the case strikes at the heart of his public image. What investigators are laying out is not just a procedural slip but a scheme they believe was built on forged documents, backroom deals and exploitation of his influence at City Hall. The MP has not responded publicly, but his political critics say this is the clearest sign yet that powerful figures continue to treat Nairobi’s public land as personal inheritance.

    As the case unfolds, Buruburu residents are demanding answers. How did prime public land vanish under the watch of city authorities? Who authorised the paperwork? And how many more playgrounds, schools and libraries have already been spirited away through similar schemes?

    If the court sides with the anti-graft body, the land will be yanked back to the government and the Buruburu community may reclaim what was theirs all along. If it doesn’t, the controversy threatens to cement yet another chapter in Nairobi’s long, dark history of land grabbing that has swallowed everything from school fields to riparian reserves.

    For now, all eyes remain on the Makadara MP at the centre of a storm that refuses to die down.

  • EXCLUSIVE: The Billion Dollar Oil Heist – How Shadow Networks Are Bleeding South Sudan Dry

    EXCLUSIVE: The Billion Dollar Oil Heist – How Shadow Networks Are Bleeding South Sudan Dry

    A Kenya Insights Investigation

    South Sudan’s oil wealth is vanishing into a labyrinth of shell companies, corrupt intermediaries and recycled traders with histories of bribery and fraud. At the center of this sophisticated looting operation stands an obscure Hong Kong firm that has suddenly seized control of the young nation’s economic lifeline while a British operator with a career built on embargo-busting orchestrates the largest systematic theft in the country’s history.

    Documents and sources reviewed by Kenya Insights reveal that Cathay Petroleum, a company that spent fifteen years in relative obscurity, now commands the lion’s share of South Sudanese crude exports through an alliance with Euroamerica Energy, a clandestine operation run by Idris Taha, a Northern Sudanese businessman who has made a career operating in the world’s most corrupt oil markets.

    Together with dismissed Vice President Benjamin Bol Mel and a network of facilitators including Dutch national Cornelis Nicolaas Abraham Loos, they have constructed what investigators describe as an integrated predatory ecosystem that siphons hundreds of millions of dollars from one of Africa’s poorest nations.

    The scale of the operation is staggering. Euroamerica Energy currently controls more than eighty percent of crude cargoes exported from South Sudan in recent months, with two out of three shipments in November and three out of four in December flowing through channels that bypass every financial oversight mechanism in the country.

    No prepayments reach the Ministry of Finance. No records land at the Central Bank. The opacity is so complete that it directly contributed to the recent arrest of the Central Bank Governor, sources familiar with the matter confirmed.

    The architecture of this theft draws on a playbook perfected over decades in Libya, Yemen, Sudan and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    Cathay Petroleum was founded in March 2003 by a Chinese national operating between Hong Kong and Singapore with a specialty in crude oil trading from sanctioned or sensitive countries.

    The company first appeared in the early 2010s as what industry insiders call a sleeve, a shell company used by Arcadia Petroleum, the now-defunct London trading house that operated extensively in South Sudan, Yemen and Nigeria.

    Arcadia’s collapse in 2018 came amid allegations of massive internal fraud involving USD 349 million. Several former directors were accused of using shell companies, including Cathay Petroleum, to divert funds.

    The case was ultimately dismissed due to lack of evidence but the traders at the heart of those schemes simply moved on.

    Some joined Glencore, the Swiss commodities giant that later publicly admitted paying bribes in South Sudan and faced corruption charges in Cameroon and the DRC.

    When Glencore exited South Sudan under the weight of scandal, those same traders migrated to Cathay Petroleum, bringing with them not just expertise but entire networks of fixers and intermediaries.

    This is where Idris Taha enters the picture.

    The Managing Director of Euroamerica Energy holds both British and German passports and has spent his career in what intelligence analysts describe as grey zones.

    He began in Libya in the 1990s during the embargo years, working through the oil for medicine programme that was systematically corrupted by parallel networks.

    After the fall of Gaddafi in 2011, Taha shifted to Iran, managing large contracts with the United Arab Emirates until those relationships collapsed amid accusations of deception.

    Now persona non grata in the Emirates, he operates primarily between Turkey, where he partners with BGN, and the United Kingdom.

    Taha’s resume reads like a catalogue of commodity trading scandals.

    He previously represented Trafigura in South Sudan before that company fled the country following its own bribery scandal.

    He then joined Litasco, the trading arm of Russian oil giant Lukoil, whose withdrawal from South Sudan left behind an unpaid debt of USD 90 million.

    Through it all, Taha cultivated relationships with South Sudanese officials, particularly Benjamin Bol Mel, the former Vice President dismissed in mid-November, and General Manasa Machar, who oversees Security and Compliance at the Ministry of Petroleum.

    The predation operates on two levels simultaneously. On the surface, Euroamerica and Cathay simply capture cargoes through political connections and sell them at manipulated prices that shortchange the South Sudanese state.

    But the more insidious theft happens upstream through the cost oil mechanism, a system designed to allow oil companies to recoup exploration and production expenses before the government receives its share.

    In theory, cost oil is a standard arrangement. In practice, it has become a vehicle for organized overbilling on a breathtaking scale.

    Oil service companies linked to Bol Mel, Loos and Taha charge up to three times standard prices for drilling and services, knowing the cost oil system will reimburse every inflated dollar before a single cent reaches public coffers.

    A well that should cost USD 20 million is billed at USD 100 million and the state absorbs the entire loss. There is no ceiling on these costs and no meaningful verification.

    The system structurally incentivizes theft.

    Cornelis Loos has been in South Sudan for over seven years serving as a close associate of Bol Mel and a key collaborator with General Manasa Machar.

    He manages money laundering operations through Dubai and has handled UAE real estate assets on behalf of the former Vice President.

    Sources describe him as a central facilitator of opaque financial flows, the man who makes the mechanics of corruption work smoothly across jurisdictions and banking systems.

    The family nature of the network adds another layer of opacity.

    Because Idris Taha faces travel restrictions in certain jurisdictions, his son Mahmoud Taha conducts meetings on his father’s behalf, regularly interfacing with Benjamin Bol Mel and other South Sudanese officials.

    The arrangement allows the elder Taha to remain in the shadows while his son serves as the public face of Euroamerica’s operations.

    What makes this network particularly dangerous is its institutional depth.

    This is not a simple case of officials taking bribes.

    It is a complete capture of the country’s primary revenue stream by a syndicate with decades of experience evading sanctions, manipulating markets and exploiting weak governance.

    The traders at Cathay Petroleum learned their craft at Arcadia and Glencore, companies that pioneered aggressive trading in frontier markets.

    Idris Taha built his career navigating embargoes in Libya and Iran.

    Loos provides the financial infrastructure to move money across borders without detection. Bol Mel and Manasa Machar provide political protection and access.

    The system works because everyone profits except the South Sudanese people. Cathay gets cargoes at favorable terms.

    Euroamerica controls allocation and captures the margin between real costs and inflated bills. Service companies charge triple rates.

    Officials receive payments through offshore structures.

    The money flows through Dubai, Turkey, the UK and various shell companies while South Sudan’s treasury remains empty and its people endure poverty despite sitting atop significant oil reserves.

    The recent surge in volumes allocated to Cathay Petroleum represents the final phase of network consolidation.

    After years of building relationships and positioning assets, the syndicate now controls the majority of the country’s crude exports through structures designed for maximum opacity.

    There are no prepayments that would create a paper trail.

    No audits that might reveal the true scale of overbilling.

    No meaningful oversight from financial institutions that have either been captured or deliberately bypassed.

    International investigators familiar with commodity trading patterns say the red flags are impossible to ignore.

    The sudden dominance of a previously minor player. The historical continuity with networks known for sanctions evasion.

    The synergy between trading companies, service providers, intermediaries and political figures.

    The complete absence of financial transparency.

    The inflation of costs to levels that defy economic logic.

    The routing of funds through jurisdictions known for lax enforcement of money laundering controls.

    South Sudan has been bled by conflict, mismanagement and corruption since independence but this represents something more systematic and more sophisticated than the typical looting that afflicts resource-rich African nations.

    This is infrastructure-level theft, the capture of an entire export system by a transnational network with the expertise to keep it running indefinitely.

    The traders involved have operated successfully in Libya under Gaddafi, in Yemen during civil war, in Sudan under sanctions and in multiple jurisdictions where Glencore faced prosecution.

    They know how to structure deals that resist investigation.

    They know which officials to cultivate and how to compensate them discreetly.

    They know which banks and jurisdictions will look the other way.

    For South Sudan, the implications are catastrophic. Oil revenues that should fund basic services, infrastructure and development instead disappear into offshore accounts.

    The cost oil mechanism that should help develop petroleum resources has become a vehicle for systematic overbilling that ensures the state never sees meaningful returns.

    The Ministry of Finance and Central Bank have been effectively cut out of the export process, unable to track revenues or verify that the country receives fair value for its resources.

    The dismissal of Benjamin Bol Mel in mid-November suggests that some elements within the South Sudanese government recognize the severity of the crisis but removing one official does little to dismantle a network this entrenched.

    Idris Taha continues to operate freely from his bases in Turkey and the UK. Cathay Petroleum continues to lift cargoes.

    Loos remains in the country facilitating financial flows.

    General Manasa Machar retains his position overseeing security and compliance at the Ministry of Petroleum, a role that provides crucial protection for the entire operation.

    The international community has largely failed to act despite clear evidence of massive corruption in South Sudan’s oil sector.

    Glencore faced consequences for its admitted bribery but the traders who implemented those schemes simply moved to new employers and continued the same practices.

    Arcadia collapsed under fraud allegations but the networks it built remain intact, now operating through Cathay Petroleum.

    Trafigura and Litasco withdrew from South Sudan but Idris Taha, who worked for both companies, simply shifted to his own vehicle and expanded his control.

    What the Cathay Petroleum and Euroamerica Energy network represents is the evolution of resource theft into a professional discipline practiced by specialists who move seamlessly between companies, countries and commodities.

    They bring with them not just personal contacts but entire methodologies for circumventing oversight, manipulating pricing and extracting wealth from weak states.

    They understand that in places like South Sudan, the combination of poor governance, conflict and international inattention creates opportunities for theft on a scale that would be impossible in more developed markets.

    The hundreds of millions of dollars that have already been diverted represent only the beginning.

    With more than eighty percent of current crude exports under their control and no meaningful oversight from financial authorities, the network is positioned to extract wealth from South Sudan for years to come.

    Every inflated service contract, every underpriced cargo sale, every payment routed through Dubai or offshore structures represents money that will never reach hospitals, schools or infrastructure.

    The human cost of this corruption is measured in development that never happens, in services that are never provided, in a generation of South Sudanese who will grow up in poverty while their country’s wealth flows to Hong Kong, London, Dubai and Ankara.

    Kenya Insights attempted to reach Cathay Petroleum, Euroamerica Energy, Idris Taha and Cornelis Loos for comment.

    None responded to requests.

    The South Sudanese Ministry of Petroleum declined to comment on specific companies or individuals but said in a statement that it is committed to transparency in the oil sector and is working with international partners to strengthen oversight.

    That statement rings hollow given that the ministry’s own Security and Compliance chief, General Manasa Machar, is identified by multiple sources as a key collaborator in the network.

    The story of Cathay Petroleum and Euroamerica Energy is ultimately a story about impunity.

    It demonstrates that for those with the right expertise and connections, stealing from the world’s poorest countries carries minimal risk and generates enormous rewards.

    The traders involved have spent decades perfecting their craft in sanctioned and conflict-affected markets.

    They know that even when caught, as Glencore was, the consequences are manageable.

    Fines are paid from corporate accounts.

    A few executives might face charges. But the networks survive, the traders move on and the theft continues under new corporate names.

    South Sudan cannot afford this.

    Already one of the world’s youngest and poorest nations, it needs every dollar of oil revenue to build the basic infrastructure of statehood.

    Instead, those dollars are disappearing into a sophisticated theft machine operated by some of the world’s most experienced commodity traders in partnership with corrupt officials.

    Until international law enforcement and financial regulators treat this systematic looting with the seriousness it deserves, the bleeding will continue and South Sudan’s oil wealth will remain a curse rather than a blessing for its people.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Ex-Boyfriend Withdraws Explosive Petition to Remove DPP After Criminal Case Against Capital FM Boss Resurfaces

    Ex-Boyfriend Withdraws Explosive Petition to Remove DPP After Criminal Case Against Capital FM Boss Resurfaces

    In a dramatic twist, businessman Hussein Aila Amaro has withdrawn his controversial petition seeking the removal of Director of Public Prosecutions Renson Igonga, bringing to an end a bitter legal battle tied to death threat allegations against his former lover.

    The sensational case involves Farida Idris Mohamed, the high-flying Commercial Director at Capital FM, who stands accused of sending a barrage of chilling death threats to Amaro through her mobile phone more than six years ago.

    The messages, which prosecutors say were sent on June 14, 2019, allegedly contained graphic threats including vows to “kill you with my hands and drag your body on hot tarmac until nobody can recognize that rotten body of yours.”

    The Public Service Commission has now confirmed that Amaro filed his explosive petition on February 26, 2025, accusing DPP Igonga of misconduct and refusing to prosecute Mohamed over the alleged threats.

    However, just days later on March 3, 2025, Amaro made an abrupt about-face and withdrew the petition through his lawyers.

    PSC Chief Executive Officer Paul Famba told the Nairobi court that the withdrawal means there is currently no pending petition seeking the DPP’s removal by Amaro or any other individual.

    “For this reason, the substratum of this petition no longer subsists, and there is nothing left for this honorable court to determine,” Famba stated, adding that proceeding with the matter would amount to a waste of the court’s time.

    The criminal case at the heart of this legal drama paints a picture of a relationship that allegedly turned toxic and dangerous.

    According to court documents, Mohamed is accused of sending multiple threatening text messages to Amaro through her Safaricom number from an unknown location.

    The messages allegedly escalated from profanity-laced threats to explicit promises of violence.

    One particularly chilling message prosecutors presented reads: “I will kill you and if I get that Swarna you have been f**king while you were with me and still f**k every day, she will know who I am then the two of you can continue f**king in HELL.” Another message allegedly warned: “Now tell me what the f**k you will do to me and you see I will finish you and bloody Swarna combined.”

    Mohamed appeared before Milimani Chief Magistrate Lukas Onyina and vehemently denied all charges of threatening to kill Amaro and using abusive language.

    She was released on a cash bail of Sh100,000, with prosecutors lining up more than five witnesses to testify against her.

    The withdrawal of Amaro’s petition came after a critical ruling by the trial court that breathed new life into the criminal case.

    In his notice of withdrawal filed on March 4, 2025, Amaro through his lawyer explained that the petition submitted to the PSC regarding concerns about the DPP’s conduct in Criminal Case Number MCCR/E222/23 had been overtaken by events.

    “We wish to inform you that the trial court has ruled that the hearing of the matter will proceed and has dispensed with the DPP’s application to withdraw the case,” the notice stated, marking a significant victory for Amaro who had initially accused Igonga of attempting to abandon the prosecution.

    The businessman’s lawyers said they were now satisfied that their client’s life and security were safeguarded, as the matter would be heard on its merits beginning May 27, 2025.

    “Accordingly, we hereby withdraw our petition against the DPP before the Public Service Commission, as our concerns have been duly addressed by the court,” the notice added.

    The case has exposed the dark underbelly of what prosecutors suggest was a volatile romantic relationship between two business associates that allegedly spiraled into threats of deadly violence.

    The allegations involve not just Mohamed and Amaro, but references to a third party named Swarna, suggesting a complicated love triangle that may have fueled the alleged threats.

    Mohamed, who holds a senior position at one of Kenya’s most prominent media houses, has maintained her innocence throughout the proceedings.

    She was summoned to court by the Directorate of Criminal Investigations to answer to the charges that stem from events that allegedly occurred more than three years before she was charged.

    The timing of the messages, sent at 10:14 AM and then again at 1:59 PM on the same day in June 2019, suggests a sustained campaign of intimidation, according to prosecutors.

    The explicit nature of the threats and the alleged promise to use physical violence have made this one of the most sensational cases involving a corporate executive in recent memory.

    Amaro’s initial petition against DPP Igonga had raised serious questions about the handling of the case and allegations that there were attempts to have the criminal prosecution withdrawn.

    His accusation of misconduct against the country’s top prosecutor had threatened to escalate into a full-blown constitutional crisis before his sudden withdrawal.

    The withdrawal has effectively closed one chapter of this multifaceted legal saga, but the criminal case against Mohamed remains very much alive.

    With the trial court having ruled that the hearing must proceed and setting a date for May 27, 2025, Mohamed will have to face her accusers and defend herself against allegations that could have serious consequences for both her career and liberty.

    The case serves as a stark reminder of how personal relationships can explode into legal battles that play out in the public eye, especially when they involve high-profile figures in Kenya’s corporate world.

    As the scheduled trial date approaches, all eyes will be on Milimani Court to see how this explosive case unfolds and whether justice will finally be served more than six years after the alleged threats were made.

    For now, DPP Igonga can breathe a sigh of relief as the petition seeking his removal has been definitively withdrawn, but questions remain about how the case was handled and why it took so long to come to trial.

    Mohamed, meanwhile, faces the prospect of a full criminal trial where prosecutors will present their evidence and witnesses will testify about the alleged death threats that have hung over this case like a dark cloud for years.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • 75-Year-Old Widow Claims She Was Defrauded By Agnes Kagure in Sh200 Million Nairobi Land Tussle

    75-Year-Old Widow Claims She Was Defrauded By Agnes Kagure in Sh200 Million Nairobi Land Tussle

    A bitter legal battle has erupted between Nairobi businesswoman and politician Agnes Kagure Kariuki and a frail 75-year-old widow over the ownership of prime land along Jogoo Road valued at a staggering Sh200 million, with accusations of fraud, forged documents, and irregular land transactions threatening to expose yet another murky real estate deal in Kenya’s capital.

    Ruth Wambui Kimani, a widow suffering from diabetes and hypertension, found herself in the dock at Milimani Law Courts on November 10, 2025, facing criminal charges of conspiracy to defraud and making false documents.

    But in a dramatic twist that has shocked observers, Wambui and her legal team are painting an entirely different picture: that of a grieving widow fighting to protect her late husband’s estate from what she claims is an illegitimate land grab orchestrated by one of Nairobi’s most prominent political figures.

    The disputed property, land parcel L.R. No 209/4843/10 measuring approximately 0.3252 hectares, sits in a prime location along Jogoo Road, making it one of the most valuable pieces of real estate in the contested case. According to court documents, the Director of Public Prosecutions alleges that Wambui, together with another person not before the court, conspired to defraud Kagure of the property and even went as far as forging a national identity card in the name of her late husband, Francis Kimani Muigai.

    However, through her lawyer Peter Mirie, Wambui has mounted a fierce defense, insisting that she is the rightful administrator of her late husband’s estate and that the land in question belonged to him long before it allegedly ended up in Kagure’s possession. The widow claims the property was irregularly sold in 2015 for a mere Sh10 million without her knowledge or consent, a fraction of its current Sh200 million valuation.

    “The accused herein is a widow and the administrator of the estate of her late husband, Francis Kimani Muigai. She was exercising her legal duty to manage the estate of her late husband,” Mirie told Principal Magistrate Rose Ndombi, adding that Wambui has already filed a separate case at the Environment and Lands Court seeking to have the title deed issued to Kagure cancelled.

    The criminal case has only added fuel to what is already a raging fire in the civil courts. The Environment and Lands Court case, which Wambui’s lawyers say is scheduled for hearing on November 19 and 20, 2025, will be crucial in determining the legitimate ownership of the contested property. Through her legal team, Wambui has urged High Court Judge Charles Mbogo to revert the land back to her family, arguing that it was transferred to Kagure through irregular means.

    The prosecution, however, has taken a hard line, opposing lenient bail terms for the elderly widow and insisting that the civil case should not shield her from criminal responsibility. They argue that the land’s Sh200 million valuation makes this a serious economic crime that warrants strict bail conditions.

    Magistrate Ndombi ultimately released Wambui on a Sh100,000 cash bail with an alternative bond of Sh1 million, taking into account her advanced age and deteriorating health. The court heard that police had to purchase medication for Wambui during her detention on Friday night, highlighting the fragile state of the accused. The case is set for mention on December 8, 2025, for pre-trial directions.

    Agnes Kagure, who unsuccessfully ran for the Nairobi gubernatorial seat, has built a reputation as a savvy businesswoman with extensive real estate holdings across the capital. However, this is not the first time her land dealings have attracted controversy and legal scrutiny.

    In previous years, Kagure’s name has surfaced in connection with several contentious land transactions that raised eyebrows among property rights activists and legal observers. While she has maintained that all her business dealings are above board and conducted within the confines of the law, critics have pointed to a pattern of disputed property acquisitions that often involve vulnerable sellers or contested ownership claims.

    The current case has drawn particular attention because of the stark contrast between the two main characters: on one side, a wealthy, politically connected businesswoman with vast resources at her disposal; on the other, an ailing septuagenarian widow fighting to protect what she claims is her late husband’s legacy. The David versus Goliath narrative has resonated with Kenyans who have grown increasingly cynical about land justice in a country where property rights disputes are notoriously complex and often favor those with money and influence.

    City businesswoman Agnes Kagure.
    City businesswoman Agnes Kagure.

    Land fraud remains one of Kenya’s most persistent problems, with countless families losing their ancestral properties to well-connected individuals through dubious transactions, forged documents, and corrupt land registry officials. The Jogoo Road case appears to fit a familiar pattern: a property allegedly changing hands for a suspiciously low sum before being registered to a prominent figure, only for the original owner’s family to cry foul years later.

    What makes this case particularly intriguing is the question of how a property allegedly worth Sh200 million could have been sold for just Sh10 million in 2015, as Wambui claims. Even accounting for property appreciation over the past decade, such a dramatic undervaluation would suggest either gross negligence or deliberate manipulation of the transaction.

    The forgery charge against Wambui adds another layer of complexity to the saga. If prosecutors can prove that she created a fake identity card in her late husband’s name, it would significantly undermine her credibility and lend weight to Kagure’s position. However, Wambui’s defense team appears confident that they can demonstrate their client’s legitimate claim to the property through the civil proceedings at the Environment and Lands Court.

    As the case moves forward, it will test Kenya’s land justice system and its ability to fairly adjudicate disputes between parties of vastly different economic and social standing. For Wambui, now released on bail and awaiting her day in court, the fight is not just about Sh200 million in real estate value but about preserving her late husband’s legacy and ensuring that justice prevails over influence and wealth.

    For Agnes Kagure, the case represents a potentially damaging blow to her carefully cultivated public image as a successful entrepreneur and political figure. Any suggestion that her business empire was built on questionable land deals could have serious repercussions for her political ambitions and business reputation.

    The December 8 mention and the upcoming Environment and Lands Court hearings later this month will be critical in determining which version of events holds water. Will the courts find that an elderly widow conspired to defraud a prominent businesswoman through forgery and deception? Or will they uncover evidence of yet another irregular land transaction that saw valuable Nairobi property change hands under suspicious circumstances?

    One thing is certain: as this case unfolds, it will once again shine a spotlight on Kenya’s broken land administration system, where titles can be disputed decades after supposedly legitimate transactions, where forgery remains rampant, and where the line between legitimate business and outright fraud often appears dangerously blurred. For the thousands of Kenyans embroiled in similar land disputes across the country, the outcome of Wambui versus Kagure may well set an important precedent for how the courts handle cases where the wealthy and powerful face off against ordinary citizens fighting to protect their property rights.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • EXPOSED: How Tycoon Munga, State Officials, Chinese Firm Stalled A Sh3.9 Trillion Coal Treasure In Kitui

    EXPOSED: How Tycoon Munga, State Officials, Chinese Firm Stalled A Sh3.9 Trillion Coal Treasure In Kitui

    In the dusty, sun-scorched expanse of Mui Basin in Kitui County lies a fortune so vast it could transform Kenya’s economic trajectory forever. Four hundred million tonnes of coal, conservatively valued at Sh3.9 trillion, sits buried beneath the earth, untouched, unexploited, and caught in a web of greed, bureaucratic sabotage, and raw power politics that has paralyzed the project for over a decade.

    The story of the Mui Basin coal mining project is a tale of how one of Kenya’s most celebrated business tycoons, Peter Munga, the revered founder of Equity Bank, allegedly joined hands with shadowy government mandarins to frustrate a Chinese mining firm that legitimately won the tender to extract this black gold. It is a story of broken promises, unpaid millions, and a nation held hostage by the competing interests of the powerful.

    At the heart of this scandal is a simple but damning fact: Great Lakes Corporation Limited, owned by Peter Munga and businessman George Kariithi, failed to honor their commitment to pay their local venture contribution amounting to Sh388 million and were officially dropped from the project in May 2018. Yet, more than seven years later, through alleged collusion with top Ministry of Energy officials, they continue to haunt the project like ghosts who refuse to leave a house they no longer own.

    The Chinese mining giant, Fenxi Mining Industry Company Limited, which was awarded the prestigious 21-year concession in September 2011, has watched in frustration as years turned into decades without a single tonne of coal being extracted. In August 2025, their patience finally ran out. FMICL served the Energy and Mining ministries with a notice of default, demanding the necessary consents to begin coal extraction within 60 days or face arbitration proceedings in Mauritius .

    The Chinese firm’s allegations are explosive. In correspondence seen by Kenya Insights, FMICL chairman Yang Wu Sheng directly accused government representatives of showing what he termed “a seemingly biased preference” for Great Lakes Corporation, despite the company’s engagement having been formally terminated. The letter, dripping with diplomatic restraint but barely concealing deep anger, painted a picture of systematic obstruction orchestrated from the highest levels of Kenya’s energy bureaucracy.

    Peter Munga, now in his eighties, is no ordinary businessman. He is the man who transformed a struggling microfinance institution started with just Sh5,000 in 1984 into Equity Bank, one of Africa’s largest financial institutions serving nearly 20 million customers across six countries . His rags-to-riches story, from a boy who grew up in penury after his father was jailed during the Mau Mau uprising to becoming a billionaire with interests spanning banking, insurance, agriculture, and real estate, has made him a celebrated figure in Kenya’s business pantheon.

    But the Mui Basin saga reveals a darker side to this entrepreneurial legend. According to documents obtained by our investigation, Munga and his partner Kariithi entered into a joint venture with FMICL in 2013, forming Fenxi Mui Mining Corporation Limited with a 70-30 shareholding split favoring the Chinese firm. To seal the deal and secure the mining rights, the consortium was required to pay the government $5 million in concession fees. FMICL was to contribute $1.125 million while Great Lakes Corporation was obligated to pay $3.875 million.

    The Chinese firm paid their share, but Great Lakes never honored their financial commitment. By May 2018, after years of promises and broken deadlines, FMICL formally terminated the partnership and brought in Dorse Gems International Limited as their new local partner, forming Fenxi Dorse International Power Limited.

    In any normal business transaction, this would have been the end of the matter. Great Lakes failed to pay, they were out. But this is Kenya, where political connections and insider dealings can trump legal agreements and Attorney General opinions.

    In November 2020, then Attorney-General Paul Kihara Kariuki issued a clear legal opinion to then Energy Cabinet Secretary Charles Keter, stating unequivocally that the concession legally belonged to Fenxi Mining Industry Co. Ltd, which had the exclusive right to carry out the mining works or assign those rights to a subsidiary of its choosing . The AG’s opinion demolished Great Lakes Corporation’s claims that the concession somehow belonged to the consortium rather than the Chinese firm that had actually paid for it.

    Yet government officials continued to entertain Munga and Kariithi as if they still had legitimate standing in the project. Ministry of Energy bureaucrats held secret meetings with Great Lakes representatives, creating what FMICL describes as bureaucratic obstacles that prevented them from either commencing mining operations or selling the concession rights to other interested investors.

    The motive becomes clearer when you consider what is at stake. Beyond the headline-grabbing Sh3.9 trillion valuation of the coal reserves, the project was expected to generate 960 megawatts of electricity, create thousands of jobs, and catalyze industrial development in one of Kenya’s most marginalized regions. For anyone with a piece of the action, the potential returns would be astronomical.

    In 2014, even as their financial obligations remained unpaid, Munga and Kariithi wrote to the Ministry of Energy on the letterhead of Fenxi Mui Mining Corporation Limited, boldly claiming to speak on behalf of the consortium and promising that payment of concession fees would be completed by May 2, 2014. They name-dropped prestigious institutions like Deloitte Beijing, HSBC’s Nairobi and Hong Kong offices, and financiers such as the US Power Africa Fund, creating an impression of serious business dealings. But according to FMICL, not a single shilling was ever paid by Great Lakes Corporation.

    The Chinese firm’s frustration is palpable in their August 2024 letter to Chief of Staff Felix Koskei. “Following the execution of the agreement, we have made several efforts to progress with the implementation and operationalisation of the project. However, these initiatives encountered various hurdles,” Yang Wu Sheng wrote, his words carefully chosen but the message unmistakable: they were being deliberately blocked.

    The pattern of obstruction continued into 2025. In July, Energy Cabinet Secretary Opiyo Wandayi and then Environment Cabinet Secretary Soipan Tuya publicly stated they were working to halt the project, citing environmental concerns and community protests. Yet in October 2025, during a tour of Kitui ahead of Energy Week, Wandayi made an about-face, announcing that the government was getting the coal mining project back on track. He called it “well overdue” and promised the locals that the project would create employment and unlock the county’s energy potential.

    What changed between July and October? Why the sudden reversal? Our sources within the Ministry suggest that the threat of international arbitration finally concentrated minds in government. If Kenya lost the case in Mauritius, the country could be liable for billions in compensation, not to mention the reputational damage to Kenya as an investment destination.

    The real victims in this saga are the people of Kitui County, who have watched for over a decade as politicians and tycoons played games with their future. Approximately 100,000 people, more than 30,000 households primarily composed of small-scale farmers, stand to be displaced to make way for the coal mining operations . These communities have been left in limbo, unable to plan for their futures, unsure whether to stay or leave, while the powerful fight over the spoils.

    There are also broader questions about Kenya’s energy strategy. Critics point out that Kenya currently has overcapacity in electricity generation and that coal does not compare favorably with other sources such as geothermal power . Environmental activists have warned that pursuing coal mining at a time when the world is phasing out fossil fuels could leave Kenya with stranded assets and saddle the country with expensive, dirty energy.

    But these policy debates have been overshadowed by the raw power struggle between FMICL, Great Lakes Corporation, and the government officials who appear to be taking sides. The project has become less about energy security or economic development and more about who gets to control and benefit from billions of shillings worth of mineral wealth.

    For Peter Munga, whose public image has been built on his humble beginnings and his commitment to uplifting ordinary Kenyans through initiatives like the Wings to Fly scholarship program, the Mui Basin controversy represents an uncomfortable chapter. When contacted by Kenya Insights, Munga declined to comment on the specifics, saying he was “not well-versed with the day-to-day operations of Great Lakes Corporation” and directing inquiries to his partner George Kariithi. Kariithi did not respond to multiple attempts to reach him.

    The Chinese firm, for its part, has made clear that it will not back down. With the 60-day deadline from their August 2025 default notice now expired, FMICL is poised to take Kenya to international arbitration. If they win, and legal experts say their case is strong given the Attorney General’s opinion and Great Lakes’ failure to pay, Kenya could face a compensation bill that dwarfs the value of the concession itself.

    As this investigation went to press, the Kenyan government had not yet granted the consents that FMICL has been requesting since 2022 to officially recognize Dorse Gems International as the new local partner. Ministry officials have remained tight-lipped about why a straightforward administrative process has taken three years and counting.

    What is clear is that powerful interests within the government continue to protect Great Lakes Corporation’s ghost claim to a project they never paid for. Whether this is due to personal relationships, political considerations, or something more sinister remains a subject of intense speculation in Nairobi’s corridors of power.

    The Mui Basin coal mining project was supposed to be a story of Kenya harnessing its natural resources to power industrialization and lift its people out of poverty. Instead, it has become a cautionary tale about how greed, political meddling, and the protection of well-connected insiders can paralyze even the most promising national projects. As Sh3.9 trillion worth of coal continues to sit untouched beneath the earth of Kitui County, one question lingers: How many more years will Kenya allow this scandal to continue?

  • Mudavadi Feted with Honorary ODM Founder Certificate

    Mudavadi Feted with Honorary ODM Founder Certificate

    By Jacob Ng’etich

    Saturday, November 15, 2025

    Mombasa – Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi was on Saturday evening awarded an honorary ODM founder’s certificate during a colourful dinner celebrating the party’s 20th anniversary in Mombasa.

    Dr. Mudavadi joined hundreds of guests at the reunion of the founding members of the Orange Democratic Movement, an evening marked by nostalgia, camaraderie and renewed commitment to the ideals that shaped the party two decades ago.

    The Prime Cabinet Secretary, who also serves as the Cabinet Secretary for Foreign and Diaspora Affairs, said the gathering offered an opportunity to reflect on ODM’s journey from the 2005 referendum campaigns to its evolution into a political force that has significantly influenced Kenya’s governance. The event was also attended by President William Ruto.

    “The absence of the late Rt. Hon. Raila Amolo Odinga was deeply felt, reminding us of a leader whose courage, sacrifice and unwavering patriotism steadied our nation through defining moments,” said Mudavadi.

    He reflected on Raila’s selflessness, recalling how the former Prime Minister consistently put the country first.

    “During the constitution-making process, he stepped back from the push for a parliamentary system but firmly safeguarded the inclusion of devolution, a choice that transformed our governance structure,” he said.

    Mudavadi noted that Raila’s pursuit of power always respected constitutionalism, ensuring political decisions were grounded in law.

    “When we first held the Kofi Annan talks, Raila insisted that the agreements go through Parliament to give them full legal backing,” he said.

    He also commended ODM’s leadership for nurturing a party that has endured where many others have faded.

    With ODM now in its maturity stage, Mudavadi urged its leaders to champion pro-people programmes, advance progressive policies and strengthen unity through continuous consultation.

    “The Orange spirit remains vibrant, and the journey ahead is filled with promise,” he said.

    The dinner brought together former ODM founders and the party’s current elected leaders.

    During the event, Dr. Mudavadi, President Ruto and former Cabinet Minister Henry Kosgey were all presented with honorary certificates recognising their roles in the founding of the party.

  • Sportybet Kenya Complete Registration Guide

    Sportybet Kenya Complete Registration Guide

    Sportybet Kenya is popular for offering a seamless signup process for new users. Whether

    you prefer signing up via mobile, web or SMS, the bookmaker ensures a simple experience.

    Here’s a guide through all available Sportybet Kenya registration methods, requirements,

    mobile sign-up options, verification steps, and exclusive bonuses for new users.

    Sportybet Kenya offers a variety of signup methods tailored to suit different user needs. You

    can create an account with your phone number or via SMS “Join” to 291123.

    Additionally, there’s a fast one-click option for those eager to jump in right away.

    How to Sign Up Using a Mobile Phone

    Signing up on Sportybet Kenya via mobile is a fast and user-friendly process, enabling

    players to set up an account in just a few minutes. Here’s a step by step guide to registering with your mobile number:

    1. Visit www.sportybet.com and locate the “Register” button on the top-right of the home page.

    2. Choose the ‘Phone Number’ registration method.3. Input your mobile number in the provided box.

    4. Set a strong password for your profile and confirm to update

    5. Hit the ‘create new account’ button to complete the process.

    After registration, you’ll get a confirmation SMS to verify your number. Finalizing this step

    grants you complete access to your Sportybet Kenya account, letting you dive into betting and exploring the site’s offerings right away.

    Sportybet Kenya Website Login

    To log in to your SportyBet Kenya account via the website: Open your web browser and go to SportyBet.com/ke.

    On the homepage, locate the login section in the top-right corner.

    Enter your registered phone number and password.

    Click Login to access your account.

    Once logged in, you can deposit funds, explore betting markets, place wagers, and manage your account.

    SportyBet Kenya App Login

    For players who prefer the SportyBet Kenya app experience, logging in is just as straightforward

    as on the website, with few details that might differ slightly: Make sure the SportyBet app is installed on your smartphone. If not, download it from

    Google Play for Android or the App Store for iOS.

    Tap the SportyBet icon to open the app.

    On the login screen, enter your username and password.

    Tap the login button to access your account.

    Once you’re logged in, you can enjoy full access to your profile, live bets, and all account

    management tools.Note: Some versions of the app might have small variations in the login steps. Check the in-app instructions for more details.

    Sportybet Kenya Deposit

    Sportybet have a special offer on their deposits as shown below:

    Players who recharge Ksh.250 and above into their sporty account get the transaction costs covered.

    The only allowed payment method viable is M-Pesa: Go to the profile section using “MY ACCOUNT” in app/site

    Click on online deposit

    You should see your balance and just below that; the deposit and withdraw buttons

    Go for Deposit

    Enter the deposit amount

    A “Top Up Now” button will turn green after entry of the cash amount. Click it to confirm that you’ve authorized the transaction

    A popup from your mpesa will request a pin; input pin and submit.

    You will receive an Mpesa confirmation of the amount deducted from the wallet.

    Reload the page and the wallet balance will have increased.Pay bill method

    Open the SIM Toolkit on your phone.

    Select the M-Pesa menu.

    Choose Lipa na M-Pesa.

    Tap on Paybill.

    Enter the business number 590555.

    Make sure you use your SportyBet-registered phone number or account for all deposits.

    Enter the amount you wish to deposit into your SportyBet account.

    Input your M-Pesa PIN and confirm the transaction.

    You will receive an SMS confirmation from M-Pesa once the transaction is complete.

    If you can’t remember either your Sportybet account number or password, then you can

    click on the forgot password button from the Sportybet login screen. Enter your mobile

    number to reset password either via SMS OTP, voice OTP or telegram OTP.

    Can I change my username?

    Unfortunately, your username cannot be changed after registration. The username you selected

    during sign-up is your verified phone number and stays linked to your SportyBet Kenya account.

    How to retrieve your login details:

    If you’ve forgotten your password, tap “Forgot Password?” on the login screen and follow the on-screen instructions.

    Should you forget your username, please reach out to our support team for assistance.

    Here are the contact details:

    Email:[email protected].

    Phone:0207640825.

    How do I change my password?

    Log into your account, go to My Account (Me), open My Account (Me) Info, select Change

    Password, and follow the prompts.

    How do I update my personal details?

    Log into your accountG

    Go to My Account (Me), open the drop-down menu, select My Account (Me) Info

  • EasyBet Review: A Leading Gambling Platform in South Africa

    EasyBet Review: A Leading Gambling Platform in South Africa

    Easybet online casino has become a popular choice for sports enthusiasts and gamblers in South Africa, thanks to its combination of advanced features and user-centric design. The platform ensures accessibility and convenience for its users, offering a wide range of options for sports betting, online games, and efficient financial transactions. With an intuitive interface, a well-optimized mobile application, and reliable technical support, EasyBet stands out in the competitive market of online bookmakers.

    User-Friendly Interface

    The EasyBet website is known for its clean and organised layout, making it simple for users to explore and engage in their preferred betting activities. On the homepage, you can quickly find functional buttons for key sections such as “Sports Betting,” “Online Casino,” “Promotions,” and “Customer Support.” The navigation is intuitive, as these categories are distinctly laid out at the top of the page for easy access. The “Sports Betting” and “Online Casino” sections are designed to be easy-to-navigate, offering users seamless transitions between placing bets on sports events or enjoying a variety of casino games. The efficient design ensures a smooth experience for both beginners and seasoned players.

    Mobile Application Features

    The EasyBet mobile application is compact yet powerful, with a download size of just 25 MB. This makes it accessible even for users with limited storage space on their devices. The app is exclusively available for download from the official EasyBet website, ensuring its authenticity and security. The mobile app mirrors the desktop version’s intuitive structure, providing all the essential features, from browsing betting options to processing transactions. This allows users to manage their activities conveniently, whether they are at home or on the go.

    Fast and Secure Transactions

    EasyBet offers users a range of payment methods that cater to a variety of preferences. Options include bank transfers, credit or debit cards, and popular e-wallets. The platform ensures quick and reliable withdrawals and deposits, providing a seamless financial experience. The minimum deposit amount is ZAR 50, making it accessible to a broad spectrum of players without compromising on quality. This focus on secure and efficient transactions reinforces EasyBet’s reputation as a trustworthy bookmaker.

    Reliable Technical Support

    The technical support team at EasyBet is responsive and dedicated to resolving user concerns efficiently. Users can reach out via live chat, email, or by filling out a customer support form directly on the website. The platform is also known for its reliability, providing an uninterrupted and secure environment for betting and gaming. With 24/7 availability, the support team ensures that assistance is always within reach whenever it is needed. EasyBet’s commitment to support and platform stability enhances the overall user experience significantly, solidifying trust among its customers.

    Sports Betting and Online Casino Entertainment at EasyBet

    EasyBet in South Africa offers an unparalleled experience in both sports betting and online casino gaming. Known for its intuitive platform and diverse choices, users enjoy a seamless and thrilling interface whether they are betting on their favorite teams or spinning the reels at the casino. EasyBet caters to all types of players, combining sports and entertainment under one roof to create an all-encompassing gaming environment. With a user-first approach, the platform ensures there’s something for everyone, from sports enthusiasts to casino lovers.

    Sports Betting at EasyBet Bookmaker in South Africa

    Sports betting at EasyBet is designed to meet the needs of both novice and experienced bettors. The platform features a wide range of sports with competitive odds, making it a top choice in South Africa. Whether it’s local leagues or global tournaments, users can find opportunities to place bets on their favorite teams and events. EasyBet supports various betting options, including single bets, accumulators, and live betting, ensuring flexibility and excitement.

    • Football: Football is one of the most popular sports for betting at EasyBet. Users can bet on domestic leagues like the South African Premier Division or international tournaments such as the UEFA Champions League and the FIFA World Cup. Options include match outcomes, total goals, and player-specific bets.
    • Cricket: Cricket fans can bet on prestigious tournaments like the Indian Premier League (IPL), ICC Cricket World Cup, and South Africa’s Mzansi Super League. Types of bets include predicting match winners, top-scoring batsmen, and total runs.
    • Rugby: For rugby enthusiasts, tournaments like the Rugby World Cup, Super Rugby, and South Africa’s Currie Cup are available. Bets range from match winners to points spreads and first scorers.
    • Tennis: Tennis betting covers major events such as Wimbledon, the US Open, and the Australian Open. Users can wager on match winners, set scores, and even live point-by-point outcomes.

    The Online Casino Experience at EasyBet

    The online casino section at EasyBet offers an engaging and immersive gaming experience. With a wide variety of games, players can enjoy classic casino staples as well as modern renditions of popular games. The platform is designed to offer endless entertainment with high-quality graphics and smooth gameplay.

    • Slots: EasyBet provides a vast library of slot games with engaging themes and exciting features like progressive jackpots. Users can explore classic three-reel slots or advanced video slots with dynamic bonus rounds.
    • Table Games: Traditional casino favourites such as roulette, blackjack, and baccarat are available in multiple variants. Whether one prefers European or American roulette or strategic blackjack gameplay, EasyBet has it covered.
    • Other Casino Games: The platform also features poker, scratch cards, and video poker for those who enjoy diverse gaming options outside of table games and slots.

    A Simple Guide to Your First Bet on EasyBet

    Screenshot

    EasyBet makes betting on your favorite sports straightforward and enjoyable. Whether you’re a seasoned enthusiast or a newcomer, the process of registration, verification, depositing funds, and placing your first bet is designed to be seamless and user-friendly. By following this simple guide, you can start your betting adventure with EasyBet in no time.

    How to Register an Account on EasyBet

    To begin your betting experience on EasyBet, you’ll first need to set up an account. The registration process is quick and ensures you gain full access to the platform’s features. All you need is a few minutes and a stable internet connection. Here is how to get started with EasyBet registration:

    1. Visit the EasyBet website on your desktop or mobile device.
    2. Click on the ‘Register’ button located in the top-right corner of the homepage.
    3. Fill out the registration form with your personal details, including your full name, email address, phone number, and date of birth.
    4. Choose a secure password for your account and confirm it.
    5. Agree to the terms and conditions by ticking the relevant box.
    6. Submit the registration form by clicking the ‘Create Account’ button.
    7. Verify your email address by clicking the confirmation link sent to your inbox.

    How to Make Your First Deposit on EasyBet

    After registering your account, the next step is to fund it so you can place your first bet. EasyBet accepts a variety of secure payment methods, ensuring convenience no matter your preference. Depositing funds is both safe and simple. Follow these steps to deposit money into your EasyBet account:

    1. Log in to your EasyBet account with your email address and password.
    2. Navigate to the ‘Deposit’ section, found in your account menu.
    3. Choose your preferred payment method from the listed options (e.g., bank transfer, credit card, or e-wallet).
    4. Enter the amount you wish to deposit, keeping in mind the minimum required amount to claim EasyBet sign up bonus.
    5. Provide any additional payment details, such as your bank account number or e-wallet ID.
    6. Confirm the transaction by clicking the ‘Deposit’ button.
    7. Wait for the funds to be credited to your account, which happens instantly.

    How to Place Your First Sports Bet on EasyBet

    Once your account is funded, you are ready to explore the thrilling world of sports betting. EasyBet’s user-friendly interface ensures placing a bet is an intuitive process. Whether you want to bet on football, rugby, or cricket, you can follow these steps to get started:

    1. Go to the EasyBet homepage and log in to your account.
    2. Browse through the available sports and events listed on the platform.
    3. Select the sport and the specific match or event you’d like to bet on.
    4. Review the odds and click on the outcome or market you wish to bet on. This will add it to your bet slip.
    5. Open your bet slip to review your selection and enter your stake amount.
    6. Confirm your bet by clicking the ‘Place Bet’ button.
    7. Once your bet is placed, you can track its progress in the ‘My Bets’ section.

     

  • Co-Op Bank Announces Sh1 Interim Dividend As Profit Rises To Sh21.6bn

    Co-Op Bank Announces Sh1 Interim Dividend As Profit Rises To Sh21.6bn

    NAIROBI, Kenya, Nov 13 – Co-operative Bank of Kenya has announced a Sh1 per share interim dividend after its profit after tax grew by 12.3 percent to Sh21.6 billion in the nine months to September 2025, up from Sh19.2 billion recorded during a similar period last year.

    The bank’s improved earnings were supported by strong revenue growth across its subsidiaries, including Kingdom Bank Ltd, Kingdom Securities Ltd, and Co-op Bank of South Sudan Ltd.

    Kingdom Bank Ltd posted a profit before tax (PBT) of Sh820.2 million, while Kingdom Securities Ltd earned Sh89.9 million PBT. Co-op Trust Investment Services Ltd, the bank’s fund management arm, recorded Sh624 million in PBT.

    The lender’s total assets increased by 8.6 percent to Sh815.3 billion, while customer deposits rose by 6.7 percent to Sh548.6 billion. Net loans and advances expanded by 6.6 percent to Sh406.5 billion.

    “Shareholders’ funds grew 24.5 percent to Sh164.2 billion, boosted by retained earnings growth of Sh12.5 billion. Operating income increased by 13.9 percent to Sh67.4 billion, driven by a 22.8 percent rise in net interest income,” the bank said in a statement.

    Operating expenses rose by 15.4 percent, with the cost-to-income ratio improving to 45.1 percent, a significant drop from 59 percent in 2014 when the bank began its growth and efficiency journey.

  • Businessman Adan Haji Isaack on Spot for Allegedly Harassing City Professor Over Disputed Land

    Businessman Adan Haji Isaack on Spot for Allegedly Harassing City Professor Over Disputed Land

    Somali businessman Adan Haji Isaack is under scrutiny for allegedly hiring goons to evict and harass a city professor over a disputed piece of land in Nairobi.

    According to a report filed at the Spring Valley Police Station under OB number 20, Adan Haji Isaack allegedly hired goons who made the professor’s life miserable.

    He is yet to be arrested as investigations have just commenced.

    The professor in question is Mr. Lumumba Nyaberi, a 60-year-old law professor, lawyer, and lecturer at the Catholic University of Eastern Africa.

    The professor’s problems allegedly began after he tried to safeguard his land against alleged land grabbers.

    The contested land is 1.2 acres located on Peponi Road in Westlands.

    The accusations against Adan Haji Isaack are that he allegedly used force to evict the professor, deploying goons armed with machetes and crude weapons with the intention of causing him harm.

    If the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) approves the charges, the businessman will be charged with trespass, an offence under the Penal Code.

    A Ghanaian national named Eric is also allegedly involved in the land grabbing while siding with the Somali businessman.

    More to follow…

  • You Can Now Sue Employer Who Takes Too Long Or Refuses To Give You The Results Of Your Interview

    You Can Now Sue Employer Who Takes Too Long Or Refuses To Give You The Results Of Your Interview

    In a landmark ruling that could reshape recruitment practices across Kenya, the Employment and Labour Relations Court has sent a clear message to employers: keeping job applicants in limbo after interviews can be costly.

    The court ordered the Nairobi County Assembly and its Speaker to pay a staggering Sh7 million to Halkano Dida Waqo, a candidate who underwent vetting for the position of Chief Officer for Housing and Urban Renewal in April last year, only to be left waiting indefinitely for feedback that never came.

    Justice Mathews Nduma found that the prolonged silence after Mr Waqo’s vetting amounted to a gross violation of his constitutional rights and fair administrative action.

    The court ruled that the candidate suffered significant harm, including emotional distress, reputational damage, and lost economic opportunities while waiting for a response that the county assembly simply refused to provide.

    The case has exposed a common but rarely challenged practice in Kenyan recruitment processes where candidates, sometimes highly qualified professionals, are interviewed and then abandoned in a void of administrative silence.

    Employment law experts say this precedent now gives job seekers a powerful legal tool to demand accountability from employers.

    Mr Waqo was among seven chief officers nominated for various positions in the county government in April 2024. While six of his fellow nominees had their reports considered and processed during a special sitting of the county assembly in May, his nomination was inexplicably left out.

    The relevant sectoral committee that had vetted him failed to table its report, and nobody bothered to explain why.

    What followed was a year of frustration and unanswered questions.

    Despite making numerous formal and informal inquiries, Mr Waqo received no useful response. His September 2024 letter to the county assembly seeking clarity on his status went ignored. The silence was deafening, and its impact was devastating.

    The court heard compelling evidence of how the administrative opacity destroyed Mr Waqo’s professional prospects.

    As a qualified professional, he had foregone other job opportunities in anticipation of the appointment. The public nature of his nomination, followed by the unexplained silence, damaged his reputation and left him vulnerable to speculation about why he had been “silently dropped” from consideration.

    Justice Nduma was unsparing in his assessment of the county assembly’s conduct. He described it as “callous and whimsical” for the respondents to argue that the matter had been overtaken by events.

    The judge emphasised that Mr Waqo’s right to fair employment processes had been grossly violated when the vetting proceedings were neither reported nor deliberated upon as required by statute.

    The ruling underscores several constitutional principles that employers must now take seriously. The right to fair administrative action, enshrined in Article 47 of the Constitution, requires that decisions affecting individuals must be made in a timely manner and that affected persons must be given reasons for administrative decisions.

    Employment lawyers say the Sh7 million award, which must be paid by January 2026 or attract interest, reflects the court’s recognition that recruitment process violations cause real and quantifiable harm.

    The compensation covers not just economic losses but also the emotional distress, mental anguish, and reputational damage that comes from being left in professional purgatory.

    The judgment arrives at a time when complaints about recruitment malpractices in both public and private sectors are mounting. Job seekers routinely report spending considerable time and resources preparing for interviews, only to hear nothing afterwards.

    Some candidates have waited months, even years, without feedback, unable to move on because they remain uncertain about their status.

    For public sector employers, this ruling adds another layer of accountability to an already heavily regulated recruitment process.

    County governments, in particular, must now ensure that their sectoral committees complete their work and that nominees are informed of outcomes within reasonable timeframes.

    The days of leaving qualified professionals dangling indefinitely appear to be over.

    Private sector employers should also take note. While this case involved a public entity, the constitutional principles and employment rights at stake apply across all sectors.

    The duty to provide timely feedback and transparent communication is not limited to government institutions.

    Human resources professionals say the ruling will likely prompt organisations to review their recruitment policies and communication protocols.

    Best practice now demands that employers establish clear timelines for communicating interview outcomes and stick to them. Even negative feedback, they note, is better than no feedback at all.

    The case also highlights the importance of documenting recruitment processes properly.

    The county assembly’s failure to table the committee report and its inability to explain what happened to Mr Waqo’s nomination proved fatal to its defence.

    Proper documentation and transparent processes are not just good governance; they are legal necessities.

    As Mr Waqo awaits his compensation, his case stands as a victory for the thousands of Kenyan job seekers who have experienced similar treatment.

    The message from the court is unambiguous: employers who fail to communicate interview outcomes in a timely and transparent manner do so at their own peril.

    The cost of administrative indifference, as the Nairobi County Assembly has learned, can run into millions of shillings.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Ex-British Soldier Fights Extradition Over Kenyan Woman’s Murder

    Ex-British Soldier Fights Extradition Over Kenyan Woman’s Murder

    A former British soldier accused of murdering a young Kenyan woman more than a decade ago appeared in a UK court Friday to fight extradition to the east African country.

    Robert James Purkiss, 38, was remanded in custody by a judge after being arrested on Thursday, Britain’s National Crime Agency said in a statement.

    Purkiss is wanted in Kenya on suspicion of killing 21-year-old Agnes Wanjiru in 2012, in a case that has caused diplomatic tensions between the two countries.

    The body of the young mother was found in a septic tank two months after she reportedly went partying with British soldiers at a hotel in Nanyuki, a town in central Kenya where Britain has a permanent army garrison.

    In September, a Nairobi High Court judge issued an arrest warrant for Purkiss, with local prosecutors saying extradition proceedings would be initiated to bring him before a Kenyan court.

    Purkiss, a married father of two, told Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London that he did not consent to being extradited, the Press Association news agency reported.

    Judge Briony Clarke rejected his application for bail and ordered him to appear before the court again on November 14.

    Agnes Wanjiru's sister Rose and another relative hold a picture of the young mother, who was found dead in 2012. AFP
    Agnes Wanjiru’s sister Rose and another relative hold a picture of the young mother, who was found dead in 2012. AFP

    Earlier, Joel Smith, a lawyer acting for Britain’s interior ministry, laid out the case against Purkiss.

    He told the court that Wanjiru was last seen alive on the night of March 31, 2012 when she left a hotel in Nanyuki with a soldier.

    She was reported missing on April 2 and her body was found “significantly decomposed” on June 5.

    Smith said a post-mortem examination identified a stab wound to the lower abdomen and a collapsed lung.

    He told the court that colleagues of the accused had told military police in Kenya that Purkiss had confessed to killing Wanjiru and even joked about her death in Facebook messages.

    Purkiss’s lawyer David Josse said that his client “vehemently denies” murder and that he has received funding from Britain’s defence ministry to pay for his defence.

    The case was a source of contention between Kenyan authorities and Britain’s previous Conservative government, and was in limbo for years.

    The Labour party, which ousted the Conservatives from power in July last year, has vowed to support the Kenyan investigation and “secure a resolution to this case”.

    Since Kenya gained independence in 1963, Britain has kept a permanent army base near Nanyuki, around 200 kilometres (125 miles) north of the capital Nairobi.

    The British Army Training Unit in Kenya is an economic lifeline for many in Nanyuki but has faced criticism over allegations of misconduct by its soldiers, as well as the maiming of civilians by unexploded ordnance.

  • Kenyan Activists Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo Released After 38 Days in Ugandan Custody

    Kenyan Activists Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo Released After 38 Days in Ugandan Custody

    Busia, Kenya – Two Kenyan human rights activists, Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo, have been freed after more than a month of detention in Uganda, where they were allegedly abducted by security forces.

    The pair was handed over to Kenyan authorities at the Busia border late last night, marking the end of a high-profile case that sparked diplomatic tensions and widespread calls for their release from civil society groups across East Africa.

    Busia County Commissioner Chaunga Barasa confirmed the handover, stating that Njagi and Oyoo were released by Ugandan officials and safely transferred to Kenyan custody.

    The activists, associated with the Free Kenya Movement, had been missing since October 1, when they were reportedly seized in Kampala while attending a political rally for Ugandan opposition leader Bobi Wine.

    Their disappearance drew sharp criticism from human rights organizations, who described it as an enforced disappearance and demanded accountability from Ugandan authorities.

    The Law Society of Kenya (LSK), Amnesty International Kenya, and Voices of Community Activists and Leaders Africa (VOCAL Africa) issued a joint statement welcoming the release, noting it came after 38 days of incommunicado detention.

    “We extend our appreciation to their families, Free Kenya Movement colleagues, human rights defenders, journalists, the ministries of foreign affairs in Kenya and Tanzania, and all active citizens who have tirelessly campaigned for this moment,” said LSK President Faith Odhiambo in the statement.

    The case highlighted ongoing concerns over cross-border abductions and human rights violations in the region.

    Kenyan Foreign Affairs Principal Secretary Korir Sing’oei had previously expressed frustration with Uganda’s handling of the matter, with Nairobi pressing Kampala for answers amid reports that the activists were held without charges or access to legal counsel.

    Ugandan courts played a central role in the saga: On October 23, a High Court judge dismissed a habeas corpus petition filed on behalf of Njagi and Oyoo, ruling there was insufficient evidence that the state held them in custody.

    This decision fueled outrage, with activists accusing Ugandan security forces of operating with impunity.

    Eyewitness accounts and social media reports detailed the abduction, with the activists allegedly taken from a fuel station in Kireka, Kampala, by armed men in uniform and forced into a van. Ugandan journalist Agather Atuhaire, who has closely followed the case, noted that the pair had not been produced in court or held in any official detention facility for weeks, echoing patterns of enforced disappearances in the country.

    Pressure mounted through protests, petitions, and diplomatic channels.

    In Nairobi, families of the activists held press conferences demanding their unconditional release, while Kenyan MPs and civil society groups petitioned parliament to summon Sing’oei for an explanation.

    Opposition figures in Kenya, including Willis Evans Otieno, criticized the Kenyan government’s response as inadequate, arguing that a state unable to protect its citizens abroad undermines its own legitimacy.

    The release is seen as a victory for regional advocacy, with groups like the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and Amnesty International urging it to signal a broader commitment to upholding human rights within the East African Community.

    Njagi and Oyoo are now en route to Nairobi, where they will reunite with family and supporters.

    VOCAL Africa and LSK have pledged to facilitate their safe return and monitor for any further developments.

    Ugandan officials have not yet commented on the release, and questions remain about the circumstances of their detention.

    Activists warn that without accountability, such incidents could erode trust between Kenya and Uganda, two key partners in East African integration.

    This story will be updated as more details emerge.

  • UK-Based Website Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged Sexual Exploitation Of Kenyan Women

    UK-Based Website Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged Sexual Exploitation Of Kenyan Women

    NAIROBI, Kenya, Nov 6 – Authorities in Kenya and the UK are being urged to investigate a UK-registered website, Kenya Horn Hub, after rights groups claimed it advertises so-called “adult tours” in Kenya, promoting sexual exploitation under the guise of tourism.

    The website, operating under the domain kenyahornhub.uk, appears as a travel service offering organized tours.

    However, human rights group Stand Up to Racism alleges it markets women as part of the travel experience, turning Kenya into a target for foreign predators.

    “This is not just a moral issue; it’s a national one. Kenya’s name, our dignity, and the safety of our people are being dragged through the mud,” said a spokesperson for the group, noting they had notified relevant authorities to investigate.

    Efforts to reach the website’s administrators were unsuccessful, and only the landing page remains accessible.

    The revelation has reignited debates on Kenya’s ability to address sexual exploitation involving foreigners. Recent cases, including a collapsed trial of a German national accused of assaulting a minor in Kilifi County, have fueled concerns about gaps in the justice system.

    Rights advocates warn that some foreigners exploit Kenya under the pretense of tourism or business, citing past incidents such as the 2023 arrest of Dutch national Elwin Ter Horst for assault.

    “More must be done to protect minors and vulnerable women. Kenya’s hospitality should never be mistaken for weakness,” said a Stand Up to Racism activist.

    The group plans to petition both Kenyan and UK authorities to investigate websites and individuals linked to online sexual exploitation networks, calling for decisive action to safeguard victims and hold offenders accountable.

    No official statements have yet been issued by Kenyan or UK authorities regarding the allegations.

  • Tanzania Demands Extradition of US-Based Activist Mange Kimambi Over Social Media Posts on Post-Election Violence

    Tanzania Demands Extradition of US-Based Activist Mange Kimambi Over Social Media Posts on Post-Election Violence

    Tanzania’s newly reappointed Attorney General Hamza Said Johari has sparked controversy after publicly demanding the arrest and extradition of outspoken activist Mange Kimambi from the United States, accusing her of inciting unrest through social media.

    Johari, who was reinstated as Attorney General barely 24 hours earlier, made the declaration in a video that has since gone viral in Tanzania.

    In the clip, he accused Kimambi of “using digital platforms to destabilize the country” by publishing videos alleging state-sponsored executions of citizens during the recent post-election violence.

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQsHRmrEu6q/?igsh=aHRwM2NscWF5dDVv

    The renewed protests across several Tanzanian towns followed what opposition groups described as a stolen election.

    Rights monitors claim hundreds of people have been killed or disappeared in the government crackdown, although authorities insist they are restoring order against what they term “lawless mobs.”

    Johari’s comments marked a sharp escalation in the government’s attempts to silence dissenting voices abroad.

    He instructed Tanzanian security and diplomatic agencies to liaise with their US counterparts to facilitate Kimambi’s arrest and extradition, arguing that her online activities amounted to criminal incitement.

    But Kimambi, who has long been a fierce critic of President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s administration, fired back in a defiant Instagram post.

    “Appointed Attorney General today, and the first thing you do is demand Mange Kimambi’s extradition,” she wrote. “You’ve killed thousands of Tanzanian youths, but you’re after Mange — not the killers or those who ordered the killings.”

    The activist ridiculed the possibility of her extradition, questioning what crime she had committed under US law.

    “The US government will laugh at you like the fools that you are. What law have I broken? Exposing your corruption and stolen elections? Organising peaceful protests? You can’t arrest me for telling the truth.”

    She further alleged that the Tanzanian government had contracted Mexican cartels to track her down, describing herself as living under constant threat.

    “Will you bring me back to Tanzania after I’ve been shot by the Mexican Cartel or while I’m walking? Be specific,” she said sarcastically.

    Kimambi, who rose to prominence through her unfiltered broadcasts on Instagram and X (formerly Twitter), has a massive online following and has frequently accused the government of extrajudicial killings and election manipulation.

    Tanzanian authorities have long viewed her as a destabilising figure, previously issuing warrants over alleged cybercrime and sedition.

    Legal analysts say Tanzania’s request faces steep diplomatic and legal hurdles.

    Although the United States and Tanzania maintain an extradition treaty dating back decades, it primarily covers criminal offences — not political speech or activism protected under the US Constitution’s First Amendment.

    “Unless the Tanzanian government can prove Kimambi has committed a recognized crime under both jurisdictions, the US would have no legal basis to extradite her,” said a legal expert familiar with extradition law.

    The standoff underscores the growing tension between Tanzania’s government and its diaspora critics, many of whom fled after a decade of political crackdowns under former President John Magufuli and continued restrictions under President Suluhu.

    Kimambi ended her fiery response with a vow to one day return to Tanzania — but on her own terms. “One day, I will return to Tanzania myself, for my own peace,” she wrote.

    “But it won’t be because you forced me back so you can arrest and shoot me like those children. It won’t happen.”

    As the Tanzanian government doubles down on its pursuit of exiled critics, human rights groups warn that Johari’s latest remarks signal an alarming slide toward transnational repression — targeting dissidents far beyond the country’s borders.

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQs1q_HEUrv/?igsh=MXM0a2xlc3pmZnY1OQ==