Tag: United States

  • The US Navy Killed 17 in Deadly Strikes. Now Venezuela is Giving Civilians Guns

    The US Navy Killed 17 in Deadly Strikes. Now Venezuela is Giving Civilians Guns

    When Edith Perales was younger, he enlisted in the National Bolivarian Militia, a civilian force created by the late President Hugo Chávez in 2009 to help defend Venezuela.

    “We have to be a country capable of defending every last inch of our territory so no one comes to mess with us,” Chávez said at the time.

    Sixteen years on, Perales, who is now 68, is joining thousands of other militia members getting ready for a potential US attack.

    The rag-tag force, mainly made up of senior citizens, has been called up following the deployment of US navy ships in the South Caribbean on what US officials said were counter-narcotics operations.

    Many of those training with the militia said they had never handled a weapon
    Many of those training with the militia said they had never handled a weapon

    The US force has destroyed at least three boats it said were carrying drugs from Venezuela to the US, killing at least 17 people on board.

    Venezuela’s defence minister, Vladimir Padrino, said the attacks and the US naval deployment amounted to a “non-declared war” by the US against Venezuela and President Nicolás Maduro swiftly called the militia into active duty.

    Perales has got his uniform and boots at hand, ready to defend his “bastion” – the Caracas neighbourhood where he lives.

    He lives in 23 de Enero, an area in the capital which has traditionally been a stronghold of Chavismo – the leftist ideology founded by the late President Chávez and adopted by his handpicked successor in office, Nicolás Maduro.

    A loyal government supporter, he says he is “ready to serve whenever they call me”.

    “We have to defend the fatherland,” he tells the BBC, echoing speeches given by President Maduro in the wake of the strikes on the boats.

    Graffiti in a pro-government neighbourhood reads: 'If you mess with Maduro, you mess with the neighbourhood"
    Graffiti in a pro-government neighbourhood reads: ‘If you mess with Maduro, you mess with the neighbourhood”

    While experts have told the BBC that the deployment of US naval forces in the South Caribbean is large, they have also pointed out that it is not large enough to suggest that it is part of a planned invasion.

    There is little doubt though that the relationship between Venezuela and the US – which has long been strained – has deteriorated further since Donald Trump returned to office.

    The US is among a raft of nations which have not recognised the re-election of Maduro in July 2024, pointing to evidence gathered by the Venezuelan opposition with the help of independent observers showing that his rival, Edmundo González, won the election by a landslide.

    Shortly after coming into office for the second time, Trump declared the Venezuelan criminal gang, Tren de Aragua, a terrorist group, which he has used as justification for deporting Venezuelan migrants from the US and for the recent military action in the Caribbean.

    The Trump administration has also accused Maduro of being in league with drug cartels and recently doubled the reward it is offering for information leading to his capture to $50m (£37.3m).

    Maduro has vehemently rejected Washington’s accusations and has defended his government’s actions against drug trafficking.

    But the Maduro government has also co-operated with the Trump administration by taking back Venezuelan migrants deported from the US, whom US officials had accused of being gang members.

    After the first boat strike, Maduro also sent a letter to his US counterpart calling for a meeting – an approach which has been rebuffed by the White House.

    But his rhetoric internally has remained combative.

    Maduro has ordered the Venezuelan military – the National Bolivarian Armed Forces (FANB) – to train local militias like the one to which Edith Perales belongs.

    These groups are mostly made up of volunteers from poor communities, although public sector workers have reported being pressured into joining them as well.

    In the past, the militia has mainly been used to boost numbers at political rallies and parades.

    Its members tend to be much older than those who join the feared “colectivos” – gangs of hard-core government supporters which have been accused of committing human rights abuses and which are often used to break up anti-government protests.

    But seemingly jittery in the face of what it perceives as a US threat, Maduro’s government is now training up the militia.

    On a Saturday afternoon, soldiers fan out in Caracas’ Petare neighbourhood to fulfil Maduro’s order that “the barracks come to the people”.

    The soldiers’ task is to teach the locals how to handle arms to respond to “the enemy”.

    The training scenario includes tanks, Russian-made rifles – not loaded – and instruction posters.

    A soldier is giving instructions to a small group on a loud speaker.

    “The important thing is to familiarise yourselves with the weapons; we aim at the target and make a hit.”

    Armoured vehicles were on display at one of the militia exercises in Caracas
    Armoured vehicles were on display at one of the militia exercises in Caracas

    Everyone in the neighbourhood, including women and children, is listening.

    Most of the volunteers taking part in the training exercise have no experience in armed fighting, but what they lack in experience they make up for in enthusiasm.

    “If I have to lay down my life in battle, I’ll do it,” Francisco Ojeda, one of the locals taking part, tells BBC News Mundo.

    The 69-year-old hurls himself on the sun-baked tarmac and holds a combat position as he clutches an AK-103 rifle. A soldier corrects his form.

    “Even the cats will come out here to shoot, to defend our fatherland,” he says.

    His eagerness is matched by that of Glady Rodríguez, a 67-year-old woman who recently joined the militia. “We are not going to allow any US government to come and invade,” she insists.

    Home-maker Yarelis Jaimes, 38, is a little more hesitant. “This is the first time I grab such a weapon,” she says. “I feel a bit nervous, but I know that I can do it.”

    But while the residents in Petare are learning to handle a rifle, outside of Maduro’s strongholds, life goes on as normal, with few seeming to give much thought to the possibility of an invasion.

    Even just a few metres from where Francisco Ojeda was taking position in the dusty street, residents go about their daily routine unperturbed. Street sellers display their wares, while other people do the shop for the weekend without even glancing at the militia members carrying out their exercises.

    Benigno Alarcón, a political analyst at the Andrés Bello Catholic University, says Maduro’s plan for the militia is not for it to engage in battle but rather to act as a “human shield”.

    Prof Alarcón argues that by calling up civilians, the Maduro government wants to increase the human cost any potential US military action would incur by making the possibility of human casualties much higher.

    According to Prof Alarcón, it therefore does not matter if the militia are not well trained or even if they are unarmed.

    Maduro has claimed that more than 8.2 million civilians are enlisted in the militia and in the reserves, but this figure has been widely questioned.

    Perales, who has been in the militia for decades, sees his role as a “defender” of his street, the neighbourhood where he lives, what he knows.

    While he has taken part in previous training exercises, he has opted out of the more recent ones, due to his age and health.

    But were a conflict to happen, he says he is ready: “We must defend the territory. To wear the uniform already implies a responsibility.”

    (BBC)

  • Trump Administration Pulls US Out of UNESCO Again

    Trump Administration Pulls US Out of UNESCO Again

    The US has said it will leave the United Nations’ culture and education agency Unesco, accusing it of supporting “woke, divisive cultural and social causes”.

    Unesco’s Director General Audrey Azoulay described the decision as “regrettable” but “anticipated”.

    The move is the latest step in the Trump administration’s efforts to cut ties with international bodies, after removing the US from the World Health Organization and Paris Climate Agreement, as well as cutting funding for foreign relief efforts.

    Unesco has 194 member states around the world, and is best known for listing world heritage sites. The US’ decision will take effect from December 2026.

    The state department said Unesco’s “globalist, ideological agenda for international development” was “at odds with our America First foreign policy”.

    It also described the inclusion of the Palestinians in Unesco in 2011, as “highly problematic, contrary to US policy, and contributed to the proliferation of anti-Israel rhetoric within the organization”.

    Those claims “contradict the reality of Unesco’s efforts, particularly in the field of Holocaust education and the fight against antisemitism,” the organisation’s head Audrey Azoulay said.

    “This decision contradicts the fundamental principles of multilateralism, and may affect first and foremost our many partners in the United States of America— communities seeking site inscription on the World Heritage List, Creative City status, and University Chairs,” she added.

    The Unesco head said the agency had been preparing for Washington’s move, diversifying its sources of funding. Currently, she said, Unesco was getting about 8% of its budget from the US.

    In 2017, during his first presidency, Trump pulled the US out of Unesco but the decision was later reversed under Joe Biden’s administration.

    The Paris-based UN agency was set up in November 1945 – shortly after World War Two – to promote peace and security through global co-operation in education, arts, sciences and culture.

    (BBC)

  • Trump and Musk Enter Bitter Feud – and Washington Buckles Up

    Trump and Musk Enter Bitter Feud – and Washington Buckles Up

    What happens when the richest person and the most powerful politician have a knock-down, drag-out fight?

    The world may be about to find out.

    A disagreement between Elon Musk and Donald Trump started at a simmer last week, began bubbling on Wednesday and is now in full-on boil. And like everything these two men do, it is all spilling out into public view. These two men have two of the world’s biggest megaphones, and they clearly enjoy using them.

    In remarks at the Oval Office on Thursday afternoon, Trump sounded a bit like a spurned lover. He expressed surprise at Musk’s criticism of his “big, beautiful” tax and spending legislation. He pushed back against the notion that he would have lost last year’s presidential election without Musk’s hundreds of millions of dollars in support. And he said Musk was only changing his tune now because his car company, Tesla, will be hurt by the Republican push to end electric vehicle tax credits.

    Musk took to his social media site, X, with a very Generation X response for his 220 million followers: “Whatever”. He said he didn’t care about the car subsidies, he wanted to shrink the national debt, which he says is an existential threat to the nation. He called Trump “ungrateful” for his help last year and insisted that Democrats would have prevailed without him.

    Musk and Trump had formed a powerful but unlikely alliance , culminating in the tech billionaire having a key position of budget-slashing authority in the Trump administration. Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or Doge, became one of the biggest stories of Trump’s first 100 days, as it shuttered entire agencies and dismissed thousands of government workers.

    It wasn’t long, however, before speculation began over when – and how – the two outsized personalities would ultimately fall out.

    For a while, it seemed like those predictions were off the mark. Trump stood by Musk even as the latter’s popularity dropped, as he feuded with administration officials and as he became a liability in several key elections earlier this year. Every time it appeared there would be a break, Musk would pop up in the Oval Office, or the Cabinet room or on the president’s Air Force One flight to Mar-a-Lago.

    When Musk’s 130 days as a “special government employee” ended last week, the two had a chummy Oval Office send-off, with hints that Musk might someday return.

    It’s safe to say that any invitation has been rescinded.

    “Elon and I had a great relationship,” Trump said on Thursday – a comment notable for its use of the past tense.

    There had been some thought that Trump’s surprise announcement on Wednesday night of a new travel ban, additional sanctions on Harvard and a conspiracy-laced administration investigation of former President Joe Biden were all efforts to change the subject from Musk’s criticism. The White House and its allies in Congress seemed careful not to further antagonise him after his earlier comments.

    Then Trump spoke out and … so much for that.

    Now the question is where the dispute goes next. Congressional Republicans could find it harder to keep their members behind Trump’s bill with Musk providing rhetorical – and, perhaps financial – air for those who break ranks.

    Trump, who takes pride in being a devastating counterpuncher, will have plenty of opportunity to lay into Musk. What will happen to Musk’s Doge allies still in the Trump administration or government contracts to Musk-related companies or Biden-era investigations into Musk’s business dealings?

    “The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon’s governmental subsidies and contracts,” Trump posted menacingly on his own social media website.

    If Trump turns the machinery of government against Musk, the tech billionaire will feel pain. Tesla’s stock price was down 12% on Thursday.

    But Musk also has near limitless resources to respond, including by funding insurgent challengers to Republicans in next year’s elections and primaries. He may not win a fight against the whole of Trump’s government, but he could exact a high political price.

    Meanwhile, Democrats are on the sidelines, wondering how to respond. Few seem willing to welcome Musk, a former donor to their party, back into the fold. But there’s also the old adage that the enemy of an enemy is a friend.

    “It’s a zero-sum game,” Liam Kerr, a Democratic strategist, told Politico. “Anything that he does that moves more toward Democrats hurts Republicans.”

    At the very least, Democrats seem happy to stand back and let the two men exchange blows. And until they abandon this fight, the din is likely to drown out everything else in American politics.

    But don’t expect this spat to end anytime soon.

    “Trump has 3.5 years left as president,” Musk wrote on X, “but I will be around for 40-plus years.”

    (BBC)

  • Reboot of Disaster-Hit Fyre Festival Postponed, US Media Reports

    Reboot of Disaster-Hit Fyre Festival Postponed, US Media Reports

    The scheduled dates and location of Fyre Festival 2 have been thrown into doubt, according to US media reports.

    The reboot of the 2017 Fyre Festival – which made international headlines, sparked a hit Netflix documentary and resulted in organiser Billy McFarland going to jail for fraud – was due to take place in Mexico from 30 May to 2 June.

    McFarland’s second attempt to stage the event was announced not long after he was released from prison, with ticket prices ranging from $1,400 (£1,058) to $1.1m (£831,534).

    But now the organisers are reportedly looking for a new location for the festival, with the scheduled dates uncertain.

    A message to ticket holders on Wednesday said the event had been postponed and a new date would be announced, ABC News reported. The festival’s website also briefly said the event was postponed, according to NBC News.

    The organisers said in a further update reported by NBC and the New York Times that Fyre 2 was “still on”.

    “We are vetting new locations and will announce our host destination soon. Our priorities remain unchanged: delivering an unforgettable, safe, and transparent experience,” the update said.

    McFarland told NBC the date is dependent on location.

    BBC News has reached out to Fyre Festival 2 organisers for comment.

    The uncertainty follows two local governments in Mexico saying they had no planning records for the festival that organisers had said would take place in their areas.

    In February, organisers announced the festival’s location as Isla Mujeres, an island off Cancún.

    However, the local city council posted on Facebook that “no person or company has requested permits from this office or any other Municipal Government department for said event”.

    The event was re-announced with a new location in Playa del Carmen. Local officials there said on X that “no event with this name has reached our city”.

    “Following a responsible review of the situation, it confirms that there is no registration, planning or conditions indicating the realisation of the event in the municipality,” a translation of the statement read.

    McFarland and Fyre Festival 2 posted documents on Instagram that they said showed approval for the event. One document indicated permission for 250 people at a venue. McFarland had said 1,800 tickets were for sale.

    To many, the latest developments will come as little surprise.

    The original Fyre was promoted by supermodels and celebrities as an exclusive getaway for the ultra-rich, and the location was hyped as a private island once owned by drug lord Pablo Escobar.

    But festival-goers arrived in the Bahamas to find all the talent cancelled, bare mattresses to sleep on in storm-ravaged tents and cheese sandwiches in takeaway containers to eat.

    McFarland was sentenced in 2018 to six years in jail for wire fraud, and was also ordered to return $29m to investors.

    He was freed in 2022 under an early release programme but remains on probation until August.

    Last year, McFarland announced the reboot, saying “Fyre 2 has to work”.

    He claimed he had spent a year planning it, and had already sold 100 tickets at an “early bird” rate of $499. It is unclear how many tickets have been sold to date.

    Andy King, an investor in the first Fyre Festival, issued a warning to anyone interested in going to its planned reboot
    Andy King, an investor in the first Fyre Festival, issued a warning to anyone interested in going to its planned reboot

    No line-up for the festival has been announced.

    Last year, Andy King, an investor in the first Fyre Festival, issued a warning to anyone interested in going to its planned reboot: “Proceed with caution.”

    Mr King, who lost $1m in the original debacle, told the BBC that McFarland was “known for the biggest failure in pop culture and wants to flip the script. But I’m not sure he’s going about it the right way.”

    (BBC)

  • ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan First To Be Hit By US Sanctions

    ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan First To Be Hit By US Sanctions

    International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan is the first person to be hit with economic and travel sanctions authorized by US President Donald Trump that target the war crimes tribunal over investigations of US citizens or US allies, two sources briefed on the matter told Reuters on Friday.

    Khan, who is British, was named on Friday in an annex – not yet made public – to an executive order signed by Trump a day earlier, a senior ICC official and another source, both briefed by US government officials, told Reuters. They spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss a confidential matter.

    The sanctions include freezing of US assets of those designated and barring them and their families from visiting the United States.

    Waiting the 60 days

    The order directed Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, in consultation with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, to submit a report within 60 days naming people who should be sanctioned.

    The ICC on Friday condemned the sanctions, pledging to stand by its staff and “continue providing justice and hope to millions of innocent victims of atrocities across the world, in all situations before it.” Court officials met in The Hague on Friday to discuss the implications of the sanctions.

    THE INTERNATIONAL Criminal Court in The Hague. (credit: PIROSCHKA VAN DE WOUW/REUTERS)

    The International Criminal Court, which opened in 2002, has international jurisdiction to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes in member states or if a situation is referred by the UN Security Council.

    Dozens of countries warned on Friday that the US sanctions could “increase the risk of impunity for the most serious crimes and threaten to erode the international rule of law.”

    “Sanctions would severely undermine all situations currently under investigation as the Court may have to close its field offices,” the 79 countries – who make up about two-thirds of the court’s members – said in a statement.

    UN deal with US

    Under an agreement between the United Nations and Washington, Khan should be able to regularly travel to New York to brief the UN Security Council on cases it had referred to the court in The Hague. The Security Council has referred the situations in Libya and Sudan’s Darfur region to the ICC.

    “We trust that any restrictions taken against individuals would be implemented consistently with the host country’s obligations under the UN Headquarters agreement,” deputy UN spokesperson Farhan Haq said on Friday.

    Khan was most recently in New York last week to brief the Security Council on Sudan.

    “International criminal law is an essential element to fighting impunity, which is unfortunately widespread,” Haq said. “The International Criminal Court is its essential element, and it must be allowed to work in full independence.”

    Trump’s move on Thursday – repeating action he took during his first term – coincided with a visit to Washington by Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who – along with his former defense minister and a leader of Palestinian militant group Hamas – is wanted by the ICC over the war in the Gaza.

    During a visit to the US Congress on Friday, Netanyahu praised Trump’s move, describing the court as a “scandalous” organization “that threatens the right of all democracies to defend themselves.”

    (Reuters)

  • Elon Musk Warns US Could ‘Lose Next War Very Badly’ Without Military Overhaul

    Elon Musk Warns US Could ‘Lose Next War Very Badly’ Without Military Overhaul

    Elon Musk, tech billionaire appointed by US President Donald Trump to oversee government efficiency, warned that Washington risks losing the next war unless its weapons programs are completely overhauled, calling for “immediate and dramatic changes” in military strategy.

    “American weapons programs need to be completely redone,” Musk said Thursday on X. “The current strategy is to build a small number of weapons at a high price to fight yesterday’s war. Unless there are immediate and dramatic changes made, America will lose the next war very badly.”

    Musk’s comments followed the release of his August 2024 interview at the West Point US Military Academy on Thursday, where he discussed the future of warfare, emphasizing the transformative impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and drones.

    AI, drones reshaping modern warfare

    In the interview, Musk stressed that countries often prepare for past conflicts instead of anticipating future threats. He cited World War I tactics resembling those from the Napoleonic era as an example. “It’s hard to change,” he said, urging a shift in mindset to adapt to evolving warfare dynamics.

    He identified AI and drones as the most significant forces in modern conflict. “The current war in Ukraine is very much a drone war already,” Musk noted, stressing that future battles will likely rely on unmanned systems, making front-line deployments too dangerous for humans.

    Musk also criticized the US for its slow drone production rate, despite technological advancements. “I think that’s going to be the biggest challenge, … it can scale but it is not currently scaling,” he said, predicting that human-piloted fighter jets are nearing obsolescence.

    AI risks, ‘Terminator’ scenario

    While advocating for AI in military operations, Musk expressed concerns about its risks, referencing the “Terminator” scenario. “I do worry about the existential risk of AI,” he said, cautioning against unchecked development of autonomous weapons.

    Musk, the owner of X, Tesla, and SpaceX, also underscored the importance of secure space-based communications, such as his own satellite internet constellation Starlink, for modern warfare, and emphasized that new technologies must be rigorously tested before widespread deployment.

    Musk highlighted curiosity as the most vital trait for future military leaders, encouraging continuous learning and critical thinking to navigate the complexities of modern warfare.

  • DeepSeek Hit By Cyberattack As Users Flock To Chinese AI Startup

    DeepSeek Hit By Cyberattack As Users Flock To Chinese AI Startup

    Chinese startup DeepSeek said on Monday it will temporarily limit registrations due to a cyberattack after the company’s AI assistant amassed sudden popularity.

    The startup earlier in the day was also hit by outages on its website after its AI assistant became the top-rated free application available on Apple’s App Store in the United States.

    The company resolved issues relating to its application programming interface and users’ inability to log in to the website, according to its status page. The outages on Monday were the company’s longest in around 90 days and coincides with its sky-rocketing popularity.

    DeepSeek last week launched a free assistant it says uses less data at a fraction of the cost of incumbent players’ models, possibly marking a turning point in the level of investment needed for AI.

    Powered by the DeepSeek-V3 model, which its creators say “tops the leaderboard among open-source models and rivals the most advanced closed-source models globally”, the artificial intelligence application has surged in popularity among U.S. users since it was released on Jan. 10, according to app data research firm Sensor Tower.

    The milestone highlights how DeepSeek has left a deep impression on Silicon Valley, upending widely held views about U.S. primacy in AI and the effectiveness of Washington’s export controls targeting China’s advanced chip and AI capabilities.

    Technology stocks were hammered on Monday, sending the shares of Nvidia and Oracle plummeting.

    AI models from ChatGPT to DeepSeek require advanced chips to power their training. The Biden administration has since 2021 widened the scope of bans designed to stop these chips from being exported to China and used to train Chinese firms’ AI models.

    However, DeepSeek researchers wrote in a paper last month that the DeepSeek-V3 used Nvidia’s H800 chips for training, spending less than $6 million.

    Although this detail has since been disputed, the claim that the chips used were less powerful than the most advanced Nvidia products Washington has sought to keep out of China, as well as the relatively cheap training costs, has prompted U.S. tech executives to question the effectiveness of tech export controls.

    Little is known about the company behind DeepSeek, a small Hangzhou-based startup founded in 2023, when search engine giant Baidu released the first Chinese AI large-language model.

    Since then, dozens of Chinese tech companies large and small have released their own AI models, but DeepSeek is the first to be praised by the U.S. tech industry as matching or even surpassing the performance of cutting-edge U.S. models.

  • China’s DeepSeek Threatens ChatGPT’s Dominance Of AI Sector

    China’s DeepSeek Threatens ChatGPT’s Dominance Of AI Sector

    Chinese startup DeepSeek’s launch of its latest AI models, which it says are on a par or better than industry-leading models in the United States at a fraction of the cost, is threatening to upset the technology world order.

    The company has attracted attention in global AI circles after writing in a paper last month that the training of DeepSeek-V3 required less than $6 million worth of computing power from Nvidia H800 chips.

    DeepSeek’s AI Assistant, powered by DeepSeek-V3, has overtaken rival ChatGPT to become the top-rated free application available on Apple‘s App Store in the United States.

    This has raised doubts about the reasoning behind some U.S. tech companies’ decision to pledge billions of dollars in AI investment and shares of several big tech players, including Nvidia, have been hit.

    Below are some facts about the company shaking up the AI sector worldwide.

    Why is DeepSeek causing a stir? 

    The release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in late 2022 caused a scramble among Chinese tech firms, who rushed to create their own chatbots powered by artificial intelligence.

    But after the release of the first Chinese ChatGPT equivalent, made by search engine giant Baidu, there was widespread disappointment in China at the gap in AI capabilities between U.S. and Chinese firms.

    The quality and cost efficiency of DeepSeek’s models have flipped this narrative on its head. The two models that have been showered with praise by Silicon Valley executives and U.S. tech company engineers alike, DeepSeek-V3 and DeepSeek-R1, are on par with OpenAI and Meta‘s most advanced models, the Chinese startup has said.

    They are also cheaper to use. The DeepSeek-R1, released last week, is 20 to 50 times cheaper to use than OpenAI o1 model, depending on the task, according to a post on DeepSeek’s official WeChat account.

    But some have publicly expressed scepticism about DeepSeek’s success story.

    Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang said during an interview with CNBC on Thursday, without providing evidence, that DeepSeek has 50,000 Nvidia H100 chips, which he claimed would not be disclosed because that would violate Washington’s export controls that ban such advanced AI chips from being sold to Chinese companies. DeepSeek did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the allegation.

    Bernstein analysts on Monday highlighted in a research note that DeepSeek’s total training costs for its V3 model were unknown but were much higher than the $5.58 million the startup said was used for computing power. The analysts also said the training costs of the equally-acclaimed R1 model were not disclosed.

    Who is behind DeepSeek? 

    DeepSeek is a Hangzhou-based startup whose controlling shareholder is Liang Wenfeng, co-founder of quantitative hedge fund High-Flyer, based on Chinese corporate records.

    Liang’s fund announced in March 2023 on its official WeChat account that it was “starting again”, going beyond trading to concentrate resources on creating a “new and independent research group, to explore the essence of “AGI” (Artificial General Intelligence). DeepSeek was created later that year.

    ChatGPT makers OpenAI define AGI as autonomous systems that surpass humans in most economically valuable tasks.

    It is unclear how much High-Flyer has invested in DeepSeek. High-Flyer has an office located in the same building as DeepSeek, and it also owns patents related to chip clusters used to train AI models, according to Chinese corporate records.

    High-Flyer’s AI unit said on its official WeChat account in July 2022 that it owns and operates a cluster of 10,000 A100 chips.

    How does Beijing view DeepSeek?

    DeepSeek’s success has already been noticed in China’s top political circles. On January 20, the day DeepSeek-R1 was released to the public, founder Liang attended a closed-door symposium for businessman and experts hosted by Chinese premier Li Qiang, according to state news agency Xinhua.

    Liang’s presence at the gathering is potentially a sign that DeepSeek’s success could be important to Beijing’s policy goal of overcoming Washington’s export controls and achieving self-sufficiency in strategic industries like AI.

    A similar symposium last year was attended by Baidu CEO Robin Li.

    (Reuters) 

  • Musk, MrBeast, Larry Ellison – Who Might Buy TikTok?

    Musk, MrBeast, Larry Ellison – Who Might Buy TikTok?

    Jimmy Donaldson – aka MrBeast – was jubilant as he told his tens of millions of TikTok followers about his bid to buy the platform.

    “I might become you guys’ new CEO! I’m super excited!” Donaldson said from a private jet. He then proceeded to promise $10,000 to five random new followers.

    The internet creator’s post has been viewed more than 73 million times since Monday. Donaldson said he could not share details about his bid, but promised: “Just know, it’s gonna be crazy.”

    Donaldson is one of multiple suitors who have expressed interest in purchasing TikTok, the wildly popular social media platform that’s become the subject of a fast-moving political drama in the United States.

    Last year, then-President Joe Biden signed a law that gave TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance until 19 January to sell the platform or face a ban in the United States.

    The legislation addressed concerns about TikTok’s links to the Chinese government and worries about the app being a national security risk.

    President Donald Trump has floated the possibility of a joint venture.

    “I would like the United States to have a 50% ownership position,” he said in a Truth Social post on Sunday. “By doing this, we save TikTok, keep it in good hands and allow it to [stay up].”

    Trump has since signed an executive order that allows the app to stay operational for another 75 days.

    Earlier this month, Bloomberg reported that China was considering a TikTok sale to Elon Musk, the world’s richest man and a close ally of President Trump, who already owns the social media platform X.

    Musk himself wrote on X this week that while he has long been against a TikTok ban, “the current situation where TikTok is allowed to operate in America, but X is not allowed to operate in China is unbalanced. Something needs to change”.

    At a news conference Tuesday, Trump was asked by a reporter if he would be open to Musk buying the platform.

    “I would be if he wanted to buy it, yes,” the president replied.

    “I’d like Larry to buy it, too,” Trump added, referring to Oracle chairman Larry Ellison, a long-time Trump supporter who was on stage with him for a separate announcement.

    Oracle is one of TikTok’s main server providers, managing many of the data centres where billions of the platform’s videos are stored.

    Last year, Oracle warned that a TikTok ban could hurt its business. The cloud computing giant was also a leading contender to buy the social media platform in 2020, back when Trump was trying to ban it.

    Billionaire investor Frank McCourt has also expressed interest in TikTok, and has been doing media interviews about the prospect for several months.

    McCourt has said he wants TikTok to run on technology overseen by the Project Liberty Institute, which he founded. He has been critical of data collection practices of social media companies.

    Project Liberty is bidding for TikTok without its proprietary algorithm. McCourt told CNBC this week that Project Liberty is “not interested in the algorithm or the Chinese technology” even as he acknowledged that the platform is “worth less” without it.

    Ultimately, President Trump is likely to have a major role in selecting a US buyer of TikTok.

    “It’s going to be a winner that’s likely to be politically sympathetic to President Donald Trump,” said Anupam Chander, a law professor at Georgetown University.

    Prof Chander said the 50-50 joint ownership model does not comport with the law’s requirements, which might prompt Trump to pressure Congress into revising the law.

    For now, the platform’s future remains in limbo.

    Prof Chander said the Biden administration made an “unforced error” by allowing the law to give the president outsized control over who owns TikTok.

    “It was a terrible idea to put the future of a massive information platform into this political maelstrom,” Prof Chander said.

  • Trump Says He May Consider Rejoining World Health Organization

    Trump Says He May Consider Rejoining World Health Organization

    US President Donald Trump said Saturday that he may consider rejoining the World Health Organization (WHO).

    “I withdrew from the World Health Organization, where we paid $500 million a year, and China paid $39 million here, despite a much larger population. … but maybe we would consider doing it again,” Trump said at ‘No tax on tips’ rally in Las Vegas.

    After Trump was sworn in Monday for a second term, he signed an executive order to withdraw the US from the WHO.

    “World Health ripped us off. Everybody rips off the United States, and that’s it. It’s not going to happen anymore,” Trump told reporters Monday while signing executive orders. He said the US paid $500 million to the UN agency. “Seemed a little unfair to me, so that wasn’t the reason, but I dropped out … China pays $39 million, and we pay $500 million, and China’s a bigger country.”

    Turning to Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s plan to expand investments and trade with the US by $600 billion in the next four years, Trump said he would ask the Saudis for more investment.

    “I believe they’ll make it a trillion. I’m going to ask him to make it 1 trillion. What the hell the money means? Nothing. You know, where they made their money from liquid gold, right? They got a lot of liquid gold,” he said.

    During his first tenure (2017-2021), Trump made his first abroad trip to Saudi Arabia, reflecting warm bilateral ties. He earlier told reporters that he would repeat the visit to the kingdom if it agreed to purchase American products worth up to $500 billion.

  • ‘A Mockery’: Trump’s New Ceme-Coin Sparks Anger In Crypto World

    ‘A Mockery’: Trump’s New Ceme-Coin Sparks Anger In Crypto World

    US President Donald Trump has been criticised for launching a meme-coin while saying he “doesn’t know much” about the cryptocurrency.

    The digital coin called TRUMP appeared on his social media accounts ahead of his inauguration on Monday and quickly became one of the most valuable crypto coins. The value of a single coin shot up to $75 within a day, but since has fallen to $39.

    But the launch of the so-called meme-coin – a cryptocurrency with no utility other than for fun or speculation – has been widely criticised by industry insiders.

    “Trump’s comments about not knowing much about the coin back up my opinion that he is making a mockery of the industry. It’s a stunt,” says Danny Scott, CEO of CoinCorner.

    The latest dip in value came after Trump told reporters: “I don’t know much about it other than I launched it, other than it was very successful.”

    When he was told his coin raised several billion dollars for him, he played it down saying “several billion – that’s peanuts for these guys” pointing to tech billionaires assembled for a press conference about AI.

    Meme-coins are often used by speculators to make money or to allow fans to show support to a celebrity or moment in internet culture.

    It’s not the first time Trump has sold crypto products. He made millions from launching a series of NFTs of him in various superhero poses in 2022.

    Some industry analysts say the president having his own meme coin is a sign that others should follow.

    “TRUMP token just signaled to every company, municipality, university & individual brand that crypto can now be used as a capital formation and customer bootstrapping mechanism,” Jeff Dorman from investing firm Arca posted online.

    However, the overall sentiment seems to be negative towards the president’s meme coin.

    Many in the crypto world are waiting for Trump to back up campaign promises to help boost the industry in the US. People like Danny Scott hope to see focused plans, particularly around Bitcoin, from the administration.

    On Thursday the president took a first step towards fulfilling those promises by signing an Executive Order to set up a working group to explore changes to crypto regulation and potentially create a national crypto stockpile.

    Last year Trump promised Bitcoin fans he would make the US the “crypto capital of the planet”. A few days into his term, the president has not issued executive orders involving cryptocurrency, nor has he mentioned it in his speeches.

    TRUMP coin is now the 25th most valuable crypto coin with a value of around $8 billion, according to the website CoinMarketCap.

    Trump and the team behind it own 80% of the coins so, in theory, they would make billions of dollars if they sold their shares and the price remained the same.

    This set-up has been described by crypto researchers at K33 as outdated for similar tokens.

    “There’s no sugar-coating this – these tokenomics are horrendous for a meme-coin,” said David Zimmerman, a K33 analyst.

    However, K33 analysts acknowledge that the remaining 80% of coins can’t be dumped on the open market so investors are partially shielded from price shocks.

    Melania Trump.

    There are thousands of cryptocurrency coins and anyone can create one.

    First Lady Melania Trump launched her own meme-coin on the eve of the inauguration, which now has a value of $700m since slumping from $13 a coin to $2.70.

    But many meme-coins have led to big losses for people investing in them.

    Dan Hughes, from crypto firm Radix, thinks the president and his wife launching their meme-coins undermines the positives of the industry.

    “This pattern of celebrity-driven token launches, particularly from political figures, potentially marks a concerning trend in crypto markets where influence and liquidity manipulation could overshadow fundamental value creation,” he said.

    Others in the cryptocurrency world think that launching meme-coins to make money is degrading.

    “The introduction of these coins during the presidential inauguration raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest and may undermine the dignity of the president and the first lady,” said Grzegorz Drozdz, market analyst at investment firm Conotoxia.

    (BBC)

  • Kenyan National Living In The US Pleads Guilty to Fraud Conspiracy Involving Romance Scams

    Kenyan National Living In The US Pleads Guilty to Fraud Conspiracy Involving Romance Scams

    A Kenyan national pleaded guilty today in connection with her role in a fraud conspiracy involving romance scams targeting individuals in the United States.

    Florence Mwende Musau, 36, a Kenyan national previously residing in Canton, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud. U.S. District Court Judge Allison D. Burroughs scheduled sentencing for Oct. 14, 2021.

    On March 25, 2021, Musau and five others were charged in connection with their roles in online scams that are alleged to have collectively defrauded victims of more than $4 million.

    According to the charging documents, Musau participated in a series of romance scams designed to defraud victims into sending money to bank accounts controlled by her and others. Romance scams occur when a criminal adopts a fake online identity to gain a victim’s affection and trust. The scammer then uses the illusion of a romantic or close relationship to manipulate and/or steal from the victim. To carry out the schemes, Musau used fake passports in the names of numerous aliases to open bank accounts in and around Boston to collect and launder the proceeds of the romance scams. She then executed large cash withdrawals from those accounts, often multiple times on a single day and generally structured in amounts less than $10,000, in an effort to evade detection and currency transaction reporting requirements.

    The charge of conspiracy to commit wire and bank fraud provide for a sentence of up to 30 years in prison, five years of supervised release, a fine of up to $1 million or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater, restitution, and forfeiture. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    Acting United States Attorney Nathaniel R. Mendell; Joseph R. Bonavolonta, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division; William S. Walker, Acting Special Agent in Charge of Homeland Security Investigations in Boston; Joshua McCallister, Acting Inspector in Charge of the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, Boston Division; and Jonathan Davidson, Special Agent in Charge of the U.S. Department of State’s Diplomatic Security Service made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorney Ian Stearns of Mendell’s Securities, Financial & Cyber Fraud Unit is prosecuting the case.

  • Video: Whistle-Blower Exposes Google’s Political Inequity And US Election Manipulation

    Video: Whistle-Blower Exposes Google’s Political Inequity And US Election Manipulation

    An investigative Journalism group Project Veritas has posted hoards of more than 950 documents from Google insider  Zachary Vorhies, who has gone public with allegations of election manipulation and political bias against the Tech giant.

    According to Project Veritas, whistleblower Zachary Vorhies stated that he has come forward because he saw something ill-lit and iniquitous going on with google after he realized that they were going to not only tamper with the US elections but use that tampering with the elections to essentially overthrow the United States.

    Video courtesy of Project Veritas

    Vorhies told Project Veritas that:

    “I gave the documents to Project Veritas, I had been collecting the documents for over a year. And the reason why I collected these documents was that I saw something dark and nefarious going on with the company and I realized that there were going to not only tamper with the elections but use that tampering with the elections to essentially overthrow the United States.”

    According to Project Veritas, which in June this year, had leaked a number of internal Google documents exposing Google’s algorithmic unfairness in search rankings, now Vorhies is claiming that the documents he shared were widely available to Google employees

    “These documents were available to every single employee within the company that was full-time. And so as a fulltime employee at the company, I just searched for some keywords and these documents started to pop up. And so once I started finding one document and started finding keywords for other documents and I would enter that in and continue this cycle until I had a treasure trove and archive of documents that clearly spelled out the system, what they’re attempting to do in very clear language.”

    In the documents provided by Vorhies to project Veritas, they contain a number of files of concern for conservatives, one of which is called ‘news blacklist site for Google Now’ which Vorhies alleges that is a shadowban that restricts News feeds from some websites on Android Google products.

    According to the whistleblower, the list includes a number of both conservative and leftist websites including newsbusters.org and mediamatters.org who were added to the list because of a high user block rate.

    Another document titled  ‘Fringe ranking/classifier: Defining channel quality’ compiled a ranking of various news sites by Google’s level of trustworthiness.

    In yet another document titled ‘Fake news & other fringes: Trashy recap’ stated that videos on Google’s platforms are rated by multiple human raters. Another internal document labeled “coffee beans”  shows alleged Google employees discussing diversity hiring practices at the firm.

    Another internal discussion thread appears to show Google employees discussing how best to change the translation of President Trump’s infamous “covfefe” tweet.

    According to Project Veritas, Vorhies told them that he hopes more Google workers come forward to discuss the practices of big tech firms.

    “My message to those that are on the fence is I released the documents. They can go in, they can see everything that Google is doing and then they can see the scale of it. Because I think that there’s a lot of engineers that have a hint that things are wrong, but they don’t understand the colossal scale that it’s at. And so for those people, I say, look at the documents, take the pulse of America, see what’s happening and come and tell the world you know what you already know to be true.”

    View the full leaked documents at Project Veritas here.