Tag: Ukur Yatani

  • Ex-Treasury CS Ukur Yatani Denied Anticipatory Bail

    Ex-Treasury CS Ukur Yatani Denied Anticipatory Bail

    Former Treasury CS Ukur Yattani suffered a set back on Tuesday after the court declined to grant him anticipatory bail.

    Yattani had filed an application seeking for anticipatory bail saying that saying that investigations against him are malicious.

    The judge declined to grant orders but directed that all parties in the case to appear in court on June 14 for inter party hearing.

    He is apprehensive that the actions of EACC are borne of malice ,ill will and bad faith and the court should protect him .

    “To this end, the Applicant seeks the interpretation of the court of the scope of the 3rd respondent’s (Milimani chief magistrate) duty in considering ex parte (EACC’s) applications for search warrants and whether the 3rd Respondent judiciously exercised its discretion in granting the search warrants in the manner that it did,” reads court papers

    The EACC opposed the application saying that there was no threat of Yattani arrest as investigations into alleged loss of 1.2 billion shillings at the Marsabit county government, were still ongoing.

  • Francis Kimemia Under Anti-Graft Radar Over Missing Millions In Nyandarua

    Francis Kimemia Under Anti-Graft Radar Over Missing Millions In Nyandarua

    Former Nyandarua governor Francis Kimemia fund himself in the hotspot like many other Uhuru orphans like ex-Treasury CS Ukur Yatani. While Ukur is being investigated by EACC over missing billions during his tenure as Marsabit governor, Kimemia has also come under focus following unaccounted for funds in the county’s kitty running into hundreds of millions that is now being blamed on him.

    Appearing before the Senate County Public Investments and Special Funds committee to answer on missing Sh58 million in three county funds, Governor Kiarie Badilisha who succeeded Kimemia told the committee that the right person to be answerable is the former governor as the misappropriation went under his tenure.

    Governor Badilisha said he has been unable to obtain critical information regarding expenditures relating to the Bursary Fund, Emergency Fund and Car Loan and Mortgage Fund for three financial years between 2020 and 2022.

    Mr. Badilisha was appearing before the committee to answer questions from the Auditor-General Nancy Gathungu report on the use of the funds in which he said his administration is unable to answer to his predecessor’s financial mess.

    The committee established that the devolved unit spent Sh57.53 million from the funds in the financial year ended June 2020.

    Of the total amount, Sh5.24 million was disbursed as bursaries to Sh329 students whose admission numbers were not indicated for verification.

    Summon Kimemia

    The audit also flagged some Sh40 million reportedly spent on emergencies.

    With the growing concern and endless questions, Mr. Badilisha has urged the Vihiga Senator Godfrey Osotsi-led committee to summon the former governor to answer to the audit queries.

    “The [bursary] expenditures cannot be verified. We have written to all beneficiary schools since we have no evidence to show that the funds reached the schools,” said Governor Badilisha.

    “This is why we are asking this committee, in public interest, to summon the people who were in office at the time to explain the flagged expenditure,” he added.

    The governor urged the committee to invoke Article 125 of the Constitution to summon his predecessor to explain the issues raised by Ms Gathungu.

    Article 125 authorises Parliament or its committees to summon any person to appear before them in order to give evidence or provide information.

    “This is the only viable option because I am able to adequately respond to these issues,” said the governor.

    Senator Osotsi gave the county government 30 days to seek responses from the beneficiary schools to confirm whether they received the funds to them, failing which the committee will summon Mr Kimemia to explain the expenditure.

    “We are going to mark this query as unresolved until we get a response from the county government in 30 days. If that is not possible, then we will invite the former governor to appear before us to shed light on the issue,” said Mr Osotsi.

    During the meeting, it also emerged that the county government was operating two bursary fund bank accounts, a move that was flagged by Ms Gathungu as unnecessary as it cost the county extra bank charges.

    Further, it emerged the officials managing the bursary funds were not keeping records of the expenditures.

    Sh500 million spent few days to the Election Day

    Mr. Kimemia is also haunted by a different bursary saga in which the County’s Assembly question how his administration hastily spent Sh500 million only a few days to the August 9, 2022 election.

    A former County Executive Committee member who is now a ward rep claimed the governor’s bursary kitty that had Sh500 million was exhausted a few days before the elections.

    Kiriita MCA Milka Wanjiru said a large percentage of the kitty for the current financial year was utilised in a span of three weeks.

    Ms Wanjiru, who was a Water executive in ex-governor Francis Kimemia administration, made the claim on the floor of the assembly.

    “The money was disbursed haphazardly in a span of three weeks to the election.” She said.

    She made the claims when she sought a statement from the assembly’s Education Committee.

    “The county runs two bursary funds – one under the department of Education and the other under the governor’s office. The county executive had also created the Governor’s Scholarship Fund for needy students and it had been allocated close to Sh500 million,” she told the hushed House

    “We need to know how much was allocated, what each beneficiary got,”

  • How UK Firm Forced Controversial Acquisition Of Telkom

    How UK Firm Forced Controversial Acquisition Of Telkom

    Jamhuri Holding Limited (JHL) through its parent company, Helios Investment, issued an ultimatum to Kenya to either fully acquire Telkom or source for strategic investors to take over ownership.

    This followed a raft of frustrations and bureaucracies by the government which bogged down the deal. The ultimatum, which was revealed by the former National Treasury Cabinet for Secretary Ukur Yatani, was invoked as per the shareholding agreement between Kenya and UK private equity firm, Helios Investment Partners.

    The government then initiated the process of JHL’s exit through the National Security Council (NSC) which pegged the buyback decision as mainly a national security matter and not for commercial purposes.

    Ordinary shares

    This, according to Yatani led to the full acquisition of all the ordinary shares in Telkom at a token of $1 only despite the Telkom board insisting that the firm’s ownership is still split between the government and JHL.

    “Whether the Government of Kenya likes it or not, they (Helios) have already given clear indication that they are exiting. And when they exit, there are only two options, GoK takes over shares of Helios or it has to bring in other shareholders,” Yatani told the Kuria Kimani-led committee on Finance and National Planning committee.

    The committee which is investigating the alleged Sh6.14 billion buyback of Telkom by the previous government has since established that is was a loan repayment. Yatani further revealed that Helios felt it was being frustrated after the government unprocedurally took over its major assets – about 78 acres of land along Ngong road that is estimated to be worth Sh10 billion. The asset has still not been reverted to Helios, according to the former CS. This, plus the rejection of the Airtel-Telkom merger due to national security concerns exposed Helios to losses in the Telkom investment.“Against that background, a directive was made to me by the national security council. I was directed to implement this issue and provide appropriate budget as required,” said Yattani.

    The proposed Telkom-Airtel merger was blocked by the National Security Advisory Committee (NSAC) on grounds of risk to national security since the government would not have much control of critical infrastructures that are critical to government communications services to the State Houses among other highly-guarded areas. The merger would have set the stage for the exit of Helios from the shareholding of Telkom.

    Telkom is also reeling under the pressure of some $239 million (Sh30.8 billion) loan that JHL absorbed from Orange East Africa, an amount that the government will be expected to inherit if the full acquisition stands as revealed by Yatani. It also owes Safaricom and America Towers about Sh9.4 billion in total.

    Telkom board, with the backing of the current government, has already started a fresh process of soliciting new investors to resuscitate it even as parliament still scrutinises the true legal status and ownership of the company. The investigation on one hand and a lurking acquisition is sending a mixed signal to the market and investors, especially for a company whose ownership has severally changed hands in less than a decade.