Tag: Samia Suluhu Hassan

  • US Reviews Ties With Tanzania After Deadly Post-Election Crackdown

    US Reviews Ties With Tanzania After Deadly Post-Election Crackdown

    The United States has launched a sweeping review of its relationship with Tanzania following a violent post-election crackdown that has drawn international outrage and cast a shadow over President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s overwhelming victory in the October 29 polls.

    In a sharply worded statement issued on Thursday, the US government said it was “comprehensively reviewing” its dealings with Dodoma, citing killings and excessive use of force by security agencies against protesters who took to the streets after the election. Washington warned that the actions “raise grave concerns about the direction of our bilateral relationship and the reliability of the Tanzanian Government as a partner.”

    The State Department pointed to a growing list of concerns, including repression of free speech and religious freedom, barriers facing American investors, and what it described as disturbing violence before and after the vote.

    “These actions have put American citizens, tourists, and US interests in Tanzania at risk, and threatened to undermine the mutual prosperity and security that have defined our partnership for decades,” the statement said. “The United States cannot overlook actions that jeopardise the safety of our citizens, or the security and stability of the region.”

    The review deals a political blow to President Samia, who had spent much of her first term repairing ties with Washington after years of friction under her predecessor, the late John Pombe Magufuli. Her government had succeeded in reopening dialogue with US agencies, attracting back tourists and restoring the interest of the Millennium Challenge Corporation, which had frozen engagement during the Magufuli years.

    But her landslide win, secured with 97.66 percent of the vote, has been overshadowed by allegations of repression, disqualifications of opposition candidates, and a hard-line response to demonstrations. African election observers have also criticised the security forces’ conduct, warning of a shrinking civic space in a country long seen as one of the region’s more stable democracies.

    Just two days before Washington’s announcement, President Samia doubled down on her defence of the crackdown. Speaking to elders in Dar es Salaam, she repeated claims that foreign actors were working with opposition figures to engineer a regime change — accusations her administration has frequently made without offering evidence.

    “Our youth were manipulated, becoming mere parrots, singing songs and attempting to recreate what happened in Madagascar so that it would occur here,” she said. She dismissed accusations of excessive force and argued that the security services responded to a real threat, asking, “What would constitute appropriate force?”

    The government has offered no comprehensive casualty figures, even as opposition groups claim the toll runs into the thousands — a figure authorities dispute but have not addressed with transparency.

    A CNN investigation found that security forces fired at unarmed protesters and buried victims in unmarked graves, intensifying calls for an independent inquiry.

    The run-up to the election was marked by sweeping restrictions on the opposition. Chadema, Tanzania’s main opposition party, was barred from fielding any candidates months before the vote, and its leader Tundu Lissu was charged with treason, a capital offence. ACT-Wazalendo, another leading party, also saw its presidential hopeful disqualified despite a court order directing the electoral commission to reinstate him.

    With Washington now signalling that future cooperation will depend on the government’s actions, Tanzania faces rising diplomatic pressure at a moment when its domestic politics are under the microscope. The coming weeks are expected to determine whether Dodoma can de-escalate tensions or whether the US will take further steps that could reshape a partnership stretching back decades.

    Screenshot
  • Outspoken Samia Critic Mange Kimambi Hit With Money-Laundering Charges In Tanzania

    Outspoken Samia Critic Mange Kimambi Hit With Money-Laundering Charges In Tanzania

    Prominent Tanzanian social media activist Mange Kimambi, a vocal critic of President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s administration who resides in the United States, has been charged in her home country with economic sabotage.

    She faces one count of money laundering involving Tsh138.5 million.

    The case is scheduled for mention on December 4 this year before Senior Resident Magistrate Hassan Makube at the Kisutu Resident Magistrate’s Court in Dar es Salaam. The matter was filed by the prosecution on August 28 this year.

    On the morning of December 2, 2025, Mange appeared in a widely circulated video on social media, confirming that she had been informed of the charges, claiming that the Tanzanian Government intends to bring her back to the country.

    In Criminal Case No. 000021172 of 2025, the alleged offence falls under Sections 12(1)(d) and 13(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering Act, Cap 423 of 2019, read together with the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act.

    According to the charge sheet, the prosecution alleges that between March 1 and March 31, 2022, at various locations in Dar es Salaam, she obtained Tsh138.5 million knowing that the money was proceeds of crime.

    The Tanzanian prosecutors further alleged that Mange acquired the money by working as a journalist without accreditation and by demanding the money through intimidation.

  • U.S. Issues Security Alert For Tanzania Ahead Of Planned Anti-Govt Protests

    U.S. Issues Security Alert For Tanzania Ahead Of Planned Anti-Govt Protests

    NAIROBI, Kenya, Dec 1 — The United States has issued a security alert for its citizens in Tanzania, warning of possible nationwide unrest ahead of planned anti-government demonstrations expected on December 9, with protest activity potentially beginning as early as December 5.

    In a notice released by the U.S. Embassy in Dar es Salaam, American travelers were urged to exercise heightened caution due to escalating tensions following last month’s disputed general election, which was marred by violence, an internet shutdown and allegations of mass killings.

    “There are ongoing calls for nationwide anti-government demonstrations on December 9, but protest activity could begin as early as December 5,” the embassy said, noting that recent unrest after the October 29 vote led to “destruction of public infrastructure, violence against civilians, internet shutdowns, and major travel disruptions.”

    The embassy warned travelers to expect significant disruptions in the coming weeks, including possible curfews, ferry cancellations between Dar es Salaam and Zanzibar, disruption of international flights, and roadblocks enforcing movement restrictions.

    Travelers were also cautioned that foreign nationals have recently faced increased scrutiny from local security forces.

    “Security authorities have searched electronics for evidence of connection to unrest or politically sensitive content,” the alert said, adding that sharing images or videos that “may cause panic” is a criminal offense under Tanzanian law.

    The alert also underscored that during periods of unrest, the embassy’s ability to assist citizens may be limited.

    It advised Americans to avoid demonstrations, maintain emergency supplies, follow any announced curfew, and confirm flight details by phone before heading to airports.

    The heightened advisory comes just days after the Tanzanian government cancelled next month’s Independence Day celebrations, with Prime Minister Mwigulu Nchemba announcing that the funds would instead be directed toward rebuilding infrastructure damaged during post-election violence.

    The opposition has called for nationwide demonstrations on December 9 to protest what it describes as a brutal crackdown following the disputed election.

    Opposition groups and rights organizations claim that hundreds of civilians were killed by security forces—allegations the government has not addressed directly, though it has formed a commission of inquiry whose independence has been questioned by rights groups.

    President Samia Suluhu Hassan, declared the winner with 98 percent of the vote, is facing growing scrutiny both domestically and internationally.

    Key opposition figures such as Tundu Lissu were unable to contest the election, while authorities shut down the internet for five days starting on election day and warned against sharing protest images.

    Graphic videos and photos of alleged victims have since circulated widely online, with international media organisations verifying some footage despite government accusations that the material is intended to “tarnish” Tanzania’s image.

    An international coalition of lawyers and human rights organisations has formally petitioned the International Criminal Court (ICC) to investigate President Samia’s government for alleged crimes against humanity during the post-election unrest, including mass killings and the clandestine disposal of bodies.

    The 82-page submission was filed with the ICC prosecutor’s office on November 13.

    On November21, pressure intensified after U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee Ranking Member Jeanne Shaheen called for an independent international investigation, following a CNN exposé that documented alleged police shootings, mass graves and possible attempts to conceal the death toll.

    “This report underscores the disturbing actions by the Tanzanian Government to suppress protestors,” Senator Shaheen said.

    “Evidence of mass graves shows an unacceptable attempt to cover up gross violations of human rights.”

    CNN’s investigation used satellite imagery, geolocated videos, eyewitness accounts and forensic audio analysis to link security forces to the use of live ammunition and unmarked burials.

    The report included images of overflowing morgues and testimonies from medical staff describing gunshot wounds to the head, chest and limbs.

    Witnesses in Arusha reported that a pregnant woman and a young man were among those shot, while drone footage appeared to show armed men—including some in civilian clothes—firing at fleeing crowds.

    The UN Human Rights Office has said multiple sources indicate that hundreds may have been killed and many more detained.

    Tanzania’s government has dismissed the allegations and criticised international media for publishing what it describes as “unverified” reports.

    Government spokesperson Gerson Msigwa said the inquiry commission announced by President Samia would “shed light” on the events, urging journalists to avoid “stories aimed at tarnishing the country’s image.”

    Prime Minister Nchemba has appealed to Tanzanians to avoid further violence, stressing the need for dialogue. “Let us not return to what we went through, because the consequences are irreparable,” he said on Monday.

    Despite early moves after taking office in 2021 that suggested a loosening of political restrictions, critics say Tanzania’s political space has narrowed significantly in the lead-up to and aftermath of the 2025 elections.

  • EU Parliament Freezes Funding for Tanzania after Election Chaos

    EU Parliament Freezes Funding for Tanzania after Election Chaos

    In a resounding show of international concern, the European Parliament has voted overwhelmingly to freeze a key funding package for Tanzania, citing severe human rights abuses and electoral irregularities following the country’s October 2025 general elections.

    The resolution, passed with a 539-0 vote, puts on hold the Tanzania Annual Action Plan 2025, worth an estimated €156 million, until credible reforms are implemented.

    The move comes amid reports of widespread violence, including killings of protesters, abductions, and the arbitrary detention of opposition figures.

    European Commissioner for International Partnerships Maria Luís Albuquerque addressed the parliament, stating that the gravity of the situation made “business as usual” impossible.

    “We have put on hold the adoption of the Implementation Decision for the Tanzania Annual Action Plan 2025,” she said, emphasizing the need for independent investigations into post-election killings, internet shutdowns, and the shrinking civic space.

    MEPs highlighted specific atrocities during the debate, including the violent crackdown on demonstrators and the imprisonment of nearly all major opposition leaders.

    Particular attention was drawn to the case of Tundu Lissu, a prominent opposition figure and former presidential candidate, who remains detained on charges widely viewed as politically motivated. Activists from neighboring Kenya and Uganda, who were observing Lissu’s trial, reported being beaten and tortured.

    The resolution also addressed long-standing grievances from Tanzania’s Maasai community, who have faced years of repression, forced evictions, and exclusion from voter rolls. Representatives warned that these issues are tied to land-grabbing for tourism and resource extraction projects, exacerbating ethnic tensions.

    The parliament’s resolution calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all political prisoners, including Tundu Lissu, an end to arbitrary arrests, torture, and intimidation of activists, journalists, and opposition supporters, independent probes into reported killings, abductions, and mass graves, suspension of EU funds to state bodies implicated in abuses, and strict democratic conditions for any future EU-Tanzania cooperation.

    Opposition leader Tundu Lissu
    Opposition leader Tundu Lissu

    The October 29 elections were marred by allegations of irregularities, low voter turnout, and deadly violence, with an uncounted number of fatalities attributed to security forces.

    The EU’s action builds on earlier concerns raised by individual MEPs about threats to activists and the silencing of critics, shifting from rhetoric to tangible measures.

    Tanzania’s government has pushed back strongly against the resolution, labeling it as unwarranted foreign interference in its internal affairs. In a statement, officials cautioned the EU against what they described as a “rising wave of political meddling,” arguing that the parliament’s actions undermine Tanzania’s sovereignty.

    This freeze represents a significant escalation in the EU’s response to democratic backsliding in Africa, potentially impacting sectors like infrastructure and development where European investments have been substantial.

    Analysts suggest it could pressure President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s administration to address the crisis, especially as other international partners, including the U.S. and U.K., have voiced similar concerns.

    However, it also risks straining bilateral relations and affecting aid-dependent programs that benefit ordinary Tanzanians.

    As the dust settles from the elections, the parliament’s stance underscores a broader message: Tanzanians deserve justice, truth, and the full protection of their rights, and silence in the face of such abuses equates to complicity.

    EU Parliament.
    EU Parliament.
  • ‘I Will Not Protest That, There’s Some Truth’: Mudavadi Defends Suluhu Over Detention and Deportation of Kenyan Activists

    ‘I Will Not Protest That, There’s Some Truth’: Mudavadi Defends Suluhu Over Detention and Deportation of Kenyan Activists

    Prime Cabinet Secretary and Foreign Affairs Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has defended Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu’s controversial remarks following the detention and deportation of several high-profile Kenyan activists, acknowledging that “there is some truth” to the Tanzanian leader’s criticisms of Kenyan conduct.

    Speaking on Citizen TV on Tuesday night, Mudavadi appeared to side with President Suluhu, who had accused Kenyan activists of attempting to “interfere” in Tanzania’s internal affairs.

    “I will not protest that (Suluhu’s remarks) because I think there is some truth. Let us face a few facts. The level of etiquette, insults, that we see in Kenya, even though we have the freedom of speech, is sometimes going overboard to some extent,” Mudavadi stated.

    The diplomatic controversy erupted after People’s Liberation Party (PLP) leader Martha Karua, Law Society of Kenya (LSK) Council member Gloria Kimani, and Pan-African Progressive Leaders Solidarity Network member Lynn Ngugi were detained at Julius Nyerere International Airport in Dar es Salaam on Sunday and subsequently deported to Kenya.

    Former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga was also deported, while activist Boniface Mwangi remains detained in Tanzania awaiting deportation.

    The activists had traveled to Tanzania at the invitation of the East Africa Law Society, reportedly intending to attend the trial of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who faces treason charges.

    Activist Boniface Mwangi still remains in the custody of Tanzanian authorities.
    Activist Boniface Mwangi still remains in the custody of Tanzanian authorities.

    President Suluhu addressed the matter on Monday, declaring that foreign activists would not be permitted to “destabilize” Tanzania.

    “We have started to observe a trend in which activists from within our region are attempting to intrude and interfere in our affairs,” Suluhu said.

    “If they have been controlled in their country, let them not come to disrupt us… they have already destabilized their countries and the only remaining peaceful nation is Tanzania.”

    In his interview, Mudavadi emphasized that while he does not support curtailing freedom of speech, he understands President Suluhu’s position as a head of state prioritizing her nation’s sovereignty.

    “She (Suluhu) has said that she is unhappy, because they observe what we do here… She is talking from a general viewpoint, and if it is a general viewpoint, then I think she has a point,” Mudavadi said.

    When questioned about his ministry’s response to the deported Kenyans, Mudavadi stressed the importance of diplomatic channels and indicated that more time would be needed to gather evidence about the operation details.

    The Foreign Affairs CS also highlighted that despite the East African Community (EAC) framework allowing freedom of movement within the region, member states have not ceded their sovereignty to the bloc.

    “The Jumuiya has not taken away the sovereignty of the states; the countries have not ceded their sovereignty to the EAC, so it still remains. If there is sovereignty, then a country will make certain decisions. They have taken the decision, so it is the duty through the diplomatic channels to find out what the circumstances were in detail,” he explained.

    Uganda

    This stance on regional sovereignty echoes similar comments Mudavadi made regarding Uganda’s arrest of opposition figure Dr. Kizza Besigye in Kenya last year.

    In the same interview, Mudavadi defended Kenya’s cooperation with Ugandan authorities in Besigye’s case, citing “national interest” and noting that the Ugandan politician had not formally applied for asylum during his stay in Kenya.

    “Uganda is Kenya’s trading partner; a lot of lives and jobs are dependent on that relationship,” Mudavadi said, emphasizing the economic implications of regional diplomatic decisions.

    Human rights organizations and opposition figures have criticized Mudavadi’s position, arguing that his comments appear to prioritize diplomatic relations over protecting Kenyan citizens’ rights when traveling within the East African region.

    The situation continues to develop as activists have reportedly issued a 24-hour ultimatum to President Suluhu to release Boniface Mwangi, who remains detained in Tanzania.

  • Babu Owino Demands Apology from President Suluhu After Interpol Watchlist Mix-Up

    Babu Owino Demands Apology from President Suluhu After Interpol Watchlist Mix-Up

    Embakasi East MP Babu Owino has stirred controversy after revealing that he was detained at Dar es Salaam Airport under the mistaken belief that he was on Interpol’s wanted list.

    Babu, who was held for over three hours, expressed outrage at the humiliating experience, asserting that he had never engaged in any criminal activity.

    According to the MP, his passport was flagged at immigration control, and Tanzanian authorities informed him that his name appeared on Interpol’s most wanted list. Shocked by the allegation, the legislator dismissed it as a serious error. “I have never even stolen a chicken, so what is the problem?” he remarked, highlighting his disbelief at the mix-up.

    Following the ordeal, Owino took to social media to demand a public apology from Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan. He described the incident as “shocking” and insisted that Tanzania must acknowledge the mistake. “President Samia owes me an apology,” he wrote, making it clear that he expected formal recognition of the error.

    Despite the diplomatic embarrassment, Babu stated that he had no intention of taking further action against Tanzanian authorities, emphasizing that he had no particular interest in visiting the country. “What do I need from Tanzania that I can’t get in Kenya? I haven’t even exchanged a single Tanzanian shilling,” he quipped, downplaying the significance of the incident.

    This incident adds to the already tense relations Babu Owino has with neighboring countries. Previously, in May 2019, Uganda banned Owino from entering the country after he hosted Ugandan opposition leader Bobi Wine in Kenya. The Ugandan government cited Owino’s involvement in allegedly inciteful statements against President Yoweri Museveni’s administration. Owino confirmed his ban, saying, “If I go to Uganda, I am banned. I cannot enter Uganda,” underscoring his unyielding political stance.

    Babu’s demand for an apology from President Suluhu signals his refusal to let the matter rest without accountability, further fueling debates on political relations and freedom of movement in East Africa.

  • DP World’s Past Port Operation Deals Makes It A Risky Gamble

    DP World’s Past Port Operation Deals Makes It A Risky Gamble

    In the recent past, atleast 22 people have been threatened or detained for criticising a deal between Tanzania and Dubai that covers the management of a Tanzanian port by Emirati logistics company DP World, according to Human Rights Watch.

    Amnesty International said a number of dissents have been detained after speaking out publicly against the ports deal signed last October by President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

    The agreement paves the way for DP World, a logistics company controlled by the emirate of Dubai in the UAE, to manage all the ports in Tanzania in consultation with the government.

    The agreement was signed after a visit to Dubai by Tanzania’s president Samia Suluhu Hassan at which 37 memoranda of understanding were concluded. Hassan has sought to portray Tanzania as open for investment since becoming president in 2021 following the death of John Magufuli. It was ratified by parliament in June.

    Critics of the deal say it poses a threat to Tanzanian sovereignty and security,

    The agreement contained several unusual clauses that weakened Tanzania’s ability to change laws, annul contracts or seek competitive bids, said lawyers.

    Clauses that have raised concern include one that prevents withdrawal from the deal “in any circumstances, including in the event of material breach, fundamental change of circumstances, severance of diplomatic or consular relations”.

    However, the government has defended the accord, arguing that it will improve efficiency, cut costs and increase revenues.

    “The Tanzanian authorities’ crackdown of critics of the UAE port deal reveals their growing intolerance to dissent,” Amnesty’s east and southern Africa director, Tigere Chagutah, said.

    The accused could face treason charges — a non-bailable offence that carries a death penalty — Amnesty said, citing the defence lawyers.

    President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

    Hassan came to power in March 2021 after the sudden death of her autocratic predecessor John Magufuli.

    Although she has reversed some of Magufuli’s most controversial policies, critics labelled her a “dictator” after Freeman Mbowe, leader of the Chadema opposition party, was arrested on terrorism charges in July 2021 before being released.

    Chadema is among those opposing the deal, which gives DP World exclusive rights for a period of 12 months to negotiate with the government on how best to manage the country’s 80 ports.

    Kenya Deal

    Dubai Port World, the UAE-based firm is also seeking to develop, operate and manage four Kenyan ports, has a controversial record.

    In February, 2006, an announcement by DP World that it was taking over management of six US ports in a $3.7 billion (Sh436 billion) deal kicked up controversy in Congress, mainly on security considerations. Under pressure and public scrutiny, Dubai Ports dropped the deal.

    In 2012, Djibouti filed an arbitration case in London against DP World, claiming that the firm bribed an official to secure concession to run Dolareh – the largest container terminal in Africa.

    Though Djibouti lost, the case revealed insights into dealings between corrupt elites and global concession operators.

    Former Treasury CS Ukur Yatani had invited DP World during the past regime of President Uhuru Kenyatta to submit commercial proposals for four projects. They include deploying its money to build three berths at Mombasa port, develop cold storage supply chains in Kisumu and Naivasha and to build a special economic zone in Lamu.

    Treasury had also extended an invitation to submit a commercial proposal to equip and operate the three completed berths in Lamu.

    By stating that the government has signed a contract to sell three ports to DP World, Kenya Kwanza leaders got it wrong. What is on the table is an offer to an investor to develop a project, and not sell the ports.

    Questions, however, arose. Why is the government of the day was offering such sweet deals to DP World? Were procurement regulations breached?

    Mr Yatani ought to have prepared a prospectus for these projects and put it out there for investors to come up with expressions of interest.

    The flip side of this, however, is that having prior  introduced an amendment to the PPP Act that allows investors to present and engage the government on unsolicited project proposals and without subjecting such projects to open tenders, the fact that the competitive bidding has been breached in gifting the projects to DP World may be a moot point.

    Dubai World has displayed dubious tactics since first expressing interest in a port concession in Kenya in 2006.

    Political fortunes
    American economic historian Fred Cooper described the African state as the “gate keeper” where elites are perpetually fighting to earn corruptly acquired money through control of ports, customs centres and other interfaces between their countries and the rest of the world.

    The DP World saga appears to be the latest in the scramble by corrupt elites to control the gate. The scramble has assumed global dimensions in Kenya in the past one year.

    International ports and transport logistics operators are involved in battles over ownership and control of port concessions or control over profitable projects involving development and building storage and logistics facilities along main transport corridors. It is a vicious fight where only players enjoying patronage of powerful godfathers succeed.

    Public litigation actors have already – at the behest of a global shipping group – lodged a legal battle where they have injuncted a plan by the government to shift control and ownership of the Japanese-built ultra-modern second container terminal to a consortium compromising the state-owned Kenya National Shipping Lines (KNSL) and Portuguese player – Mediterranean Shipping Lines (MSL).

    The timing of the case, came just as the government had concluded plans to hand over management of the terminal to an entity effectively under the control of MSL, would appear to suggest shipping lines opposed to this deal calculated that they would rather have the deal postponed until after the elections.

    Political undercurrents

    They hedged their bets on the possibility that the new government will be inclined to block the deal.

    Dubai Ports first entered the Kenyan fray in 2014 when the government floated an international competitive tender to concession the second container terminal in Mombasa.

    Port operators from China, Japan, Singapore, Netherlands and several other countries participated in the tender.

    The Chinese group, PSA International, which had partnered with local firm, Multiple Hauliers, had the highest marks, with DP World emerging second.

    The process was then cancelled amid political undercurrents. Having lost in the open tender, DP World devised another approach.

    In October 2016, the UAE quietly signed a bilateral agreement where it committed to lend Kenya $275 million (Sh32.4 billion) for expansion of the second container terminal on condition that Kenya allowed DP World to take control of the terminal.

    Two months later, the UAE ambassador wrote to the National Treasury.

    What happened next is still difficult to decipher. It seems political fortunes of DP World and its backers took a nosedive. Transferring the second terminal to DP World no longer enjoyed the support of the political elite.

    In August 2018, the Cabinet decided to transfer the operations and management to the State-owned and almost moribund KSNL in a deal that included a new shareholding arrangement between that parastatal with MSL.

    Effectively, the power and control of the terminal had been transferred to the Portuguese firm.

     

  • Tanzania President Criticised For Her ‘Flat-Chest’ And Unnatractive For Marriage Remarks On Female Footballers

    Tanzania President Criticised For Her ‘Flat-Chest’ And Unnatractive For Marriage Remarks On Female Footballers

    Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan is being criticised online for her remarks on female footballers having “flat chests” and being unattractive for marriage.

    The president was speaking at state house in Dar es Salaam to receive a trophy won by the national under-23 football team for the season’s Council for East and Central Africa Football Associations (Cecafa) challenge cup.

    She said while women were making the country proud by winning trophies, some of them did not stand a chance at getting married because of the way they looked.

    “If we bring them here and line them up, for those with flat chests, you might think they are men – not women,” she said of the women’s football team.

    She said while some of the sportswomen were married, most of them were not, “and for the way they are, a life of marriage… is a just a dream”.

    The president said sportspeople were living a tough life after their career in sports and asked the authorities to ensure their future was well taken care of after retirement. She noted that it was particularly harder for women “where their legs are tired, when they have retired from the sport”.

    Some people have been criticising her remarks. One Twitter user shared part of President Samia’s speech while criticising it:

    “This is what the ‘first female president’ has to say about other women who are challenging stereotypes by playing professional soccer!,” Maria Tsehai said.

    “What she says is not true!! She has generalized without scientific facts regarding women athletes their flat chest and their not having beauty and regarding their marriage prospects!! She is not only wrong but she lies yet again!” said Harry Mwala.