Tag: Okoth Obado

  • Migori Governor Ayacko Hands Obado Family 900-Acre Gold Belt in Brazen Political Deal Ahead of 2027

    Migori Governor Ayacko Hands Obado Family 900-Acre Gold Belt in Brazen Political Deal Ahead of 2027

    There are political deals made in the open, and then there are deals cooked in the shadows that only surface when the paper trail becomes impossible to ignore.

    What has emerged from the corridors of the Migori County Government is, by any measure, one of the most explosive land transactions in the county’s short devolved history: Governor Ochillo Ayacko’s Cabinet has quietly approved a request to lease 900 acres of public land to a private company owned by the family of former Governor Zachary Okoth Obado, a man against whom Ayacko battled bitterly for years and who currently faces murder and corruption charges in the courts of Kenya.

    The land in question, parcel Muhuru Kadem/Macalder/498, is no ordinary piece of soil.

    It sits on one of the richest gold belts in Nyanza, a zone that has historically been the flashpoint of violent conflicts among artisanal miners scrambling for a slice of its mineral wealth.

    It is public land, held in trust for the people of Migori since the days of the South Nyanza County Council.

    On it today stand a sub-county hospital, schools, a bus park, markets, an aggregated industrial park and offices of both county and national government.

    Yet the Ayacko administration, without apparent public participation or transparency, moved to hand a 30-year lease on this same tract to Global Search Solutions Ltd, a company incorporated in 2009 and registered under certificate number CPR/2009/3899, whose ultimate beneficial owner is Hellen Odhiambo Odie, wife to Okoth Obado.

    Enemies Yesterday, Partners Today

    That this deal involves Obado’s family makes it all the more extraordinary. Ayacko and Obado have shared one of the most bitterly personal rivalries in Kenyan county politics.

    In 2017, Ayacko ran against Obado for the governorship and lost. He went to court to challenge the result. He lost again. He nursed his wounds, ran a third time in 2022, and finally unseated the Obado dynasty.

    For years, the two men were the defining political poles of Migori County, as antagonistic as chalk and cheese.

    Something has changed.

    The two former adversaries have, in recent months, been photographed in each other’s company with a warmth that has set political tongues wagging across the Lake Region.

    Obado, facing a corruption trial over an alleged Sh505 million fraud during his tenure, has since decamped to President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance ahead of the 2027 General Election.

    Governor Ayacko, for his part, is said to be desperate for any political lifeline that can help him stave off a fierce challenge from Uriri Member of Parliament Mark Nyamita, who has publicly declared his intention to unseat him.

    Mark Nyamita.
    Mark Nyamita.

    In that landscape, an Obado endorsement would be worth its weight in gold, quite literally.

    It is against this backdrop that the land deal landed on the floor of the Migori County Assembly in December 2025, tabled by Majority Leader Ken Ouma. There are already glaring inconsistencies in the paperwork.

    The motion tabled by Ouma speaks of 350 acres for Global Search Solutions. The Cabinet Memorandum approved by Ayacko’s executive speaks of 900 acres. Nobody has adequately explained that discrepancy of 550 acres of gold-rich public land.

    A Man in Court, a Family in Business

    Okoth Obado is not merely a disgraced former governor. He is a man standing in the dock on two separate fronts.

    In the High Court, Justice Cecilia Githua ruled in January 2025 that Obado has a case to answer in the 2018 murder of Rongo University student Sharon Otieno, who was seven months pregnant when she was killed and her body dumped in Kodera Forest, Homa Bay County. Forty-two witnesses have testified. The case continues.

    In the Milimani Anti-Corruption Court, Obado, four of his children and several associates face charges of conspiracy to commit economic crime, money laundering and unlawful acquisition of public property, with investigators linking them to the alleged siphoning of close to Sh2 billion from Migori County coffers through networks of proxy companies.

    The EACC has already seized and auctioned properties linked to Obado and his allies valued at over Sh505 million. Among the forfeited assets were residential blocks, commercial properties and vehicles.

    This is the family whose company now seeks a 30-year lease on 900 acres of Migori’s most valuable public land. The audacity of the application is breathtaking. Its apparent endorsement by the sitting governor is more so.

    Silence Where Answers Should Be

    When Nation Media Group first broke this story, it sent text messages and made calls to Governor Ayacko seeking comment. He did not respond. His communications office promised a statement. None came. The governor’s silence in the face of such questions is not merely politically damaging. For residents of Migori, it is a thunderous statement of its own.

    The company’s Chief Executive Officer in charge of operations and finance, Evans Ouma Ogutu, whose personal telephone number appears as the contact for the company in official county documents, was more forthcoming, though not necessarily more convincing.

    He insisted that the lease application is a legitimate business matter, that Obado’s political trajectory has no bearing on the company’s operations, and that Hellen Odhiambo Odie, the registered owner, plays no role in the day-to-day running of Global Search Solutions.

    He emphasised that the request has followed due process and must still pass through the county assembly’s lands committee, public participation and, if successful there, through the National Land Commission. “We are following every procedure and meeting the requirements set for such a lease,” he told reporters.

    Perhaps. But due process does not begin and end with procedure. It also demands transparency about who benefits and why. The stated purpose of the lease is to revive cotton farming and establish a Carbon in Pulp gold processing plant. On paper, that sounds like development.

    In Migori’s political reality, cotton and gold are the window dressing for a transaction whose true currency is votes.

    Governor Ayako in the company of Obado in a recent event.
    Governor Ayako in the company of Obado in a recent event.

    The Troubling Paper Trail

    What makes this deal doubly troubling is what documents reveal about the other companies seeking land alongside Global Search Solutions.

    Majority Leader Ouma’s motion sought approval to lease 50 acres to Joymakers Foundation, 50 acres to Vivatel Networks Limited and 31 acres to Noiya Women Enterprises Ltd.

    According to CR12 records, both Global Search Solutions and Vivatel Network Solutions were prequalified suppliers for Kisumu County between 2018 and 2020, during the height of the Obado era in Migori.

    Vivatel Network Solutions also shares a postal address with another entity, Conton Group. The web of interconnected companies deserves the full scrutiny of investigators.

    The Migori County Assembly’s Lands Committee has been tasked with conducting public participation before tabling a final report.

    Majority Leader Ouma told reporters the assembly has not yet considered the matter and that ward representatives will do due diligence.

    That is reassuring in principle. But the committee operates within a political ecosystem where the executive that sent them this request is the same executive that decides their budget, their resources and their political futures. The structural incentives for rubber-stamping are formidable.

    The People’s Gold, The Politicians’ Game

    Ultimately, this story is not about Ayacko and Obado alone, though their political calculations are at its heart.

    It is about 900 acres of land that belong to the people of Migori County. It is about a gold belt that local miners have bled and died over, resources that generations of Migori residents have a constitutional right to benefit from.

    The Constitution of Kenya 2010 is unambiguous: public land held in trust by a county government exists for the benefit of its residents. It cannot be parcelled out to benefit the political ambitions of those entrusted with its stewardship.

    If the Migori County Assembly approves this lease without genuine, transparent public participation, it will not merely have failed in its legislative duty. It will have handed a corrupt political establishment exactly the prize it sought.

    The matter must now go before the National Land Commission, civil society and the courts if necessary. Migori’s gold belongs to Migori’s people, not to the next political deal cut in the shadows ahead of 2027.

  • ‘Stay Away From My Husband,’ Obado PA Confirms the Threatening Messages Sharon Received Before Her Murder

    ‘Stay Away From My Husband,’ Obado PA Confirms the Threatening Messages Sharon Received Before Her Murder

    Court hears chilling messages as Personal Assistant confirms threats extracted from victim’s tablet

    Former Migori Governor Okoth Obado’s Personal Assistant Michael Oyamo confirmed in court Friday that murder victim Sharon Otieno received threatening messages on her phone before her death, providing crucial testimony in one of Kenya’s most closely watched murder trials.

    Appearing before Justice Cecilia Githua at Milimani High Court on May 23, 2025, Oyamo corroborated prosecution evidence that revealed disturbing threats extracted from Sharon’s tablet during the investigation.

    The threatening messages

    Defense lawyer Ogada Meso read several menacing messages to the court, including one that warned: “Please leave my husband alone, I can do you the worst, you will not walk away with it.”

    Another message escalated the threats further, demanding Sharon leave an unnamed husband alone and adding ominously that if she refused, “unbelievable will be the order of the day.”

    The messages painted a picture of escalating harassment, with Sharon responding that she did not remember being involved with anyone’s husband. Oyamo confirmed to the court that these were “real-life threats sent to Sharon” that had been presented as evidence by prosecution witness number 26.

    During his testimony on the third day of defense hearings, Oyamo firmly denied any role in Sharon’s murder or conspiracy to harm her.

    “My lady, I did not collude with anyone with the intention of harming or killing the late Sharon Otieno, and I did not also do that on my own,” Oyamo told Justice Githua.

    In dramatic testimony, Oyamo alleged he was tortured by police who attempted to coerce him into implicating Governor Obado in the murder plot.

    He claimed officers took him from Uriri police station to Kisumu, where he was locked in a car for six hours while handcuffed.

    “The police wanted me to be part of the story and say the Governor organized the killing of the lady and sent me. They wanted me to put it in writing,” Oyamo stated, adding that he feared being poisoned while in custody.

    The court heard that Oyamo was recorded twice in police books at Uriri station – first as someone reporting an attempted abduction, then as a suspect to be charged with kidnapping.

    Alibi evidence

    Oyamo admitted being in Kisii town on the morning of September 4, 2018, due to a cancelled Nairobi trip, but denied seeking medical attention that day – testimony that may be crucial to establishing his whereabouts during the alleged crime.

    The proceedings faced a delay when Director of Public Prosecutions representative Gikui Gichui requested time to review new documentary evidence presented by the defense, including travel documents and Safaricom records.

    “We will be requesting time so that we can consult with the Investigative Officer on the matter concerning the new exhibits,” prosecutor Gichui told the court, requesting copies of all new documents for cross-examination preparation.

    The Sharon Otieno murder case has gripped Kenya since 2018, involving allegations against high-profile political figures.

    The threatening messages revealed in court add a new dimension to understanding the circumstances surrounding her death and the potential motives behind the crime.

    The case has been adjourned until June 11, 2025, for further directions.

  • How Treasury CS Mbadi Got Entangled in the Obado-Sharon Affair

    How Treasury CS Mbadi Got Entangled in the Obado-Sharon Affair

    New revelations in the Sharon Otieno murder trial expose Cabinet Secretary’s role as mediator in toxic relationship

    Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi found himself unexpectedly thrust into the spotlight of one of Kenya’s most notorious murder cases this week, as shocking testimony revealed his role as a mediator in the ill-fated relationship between former Migori Governor Okoth Obado and the late Sharon Otieno.

    The revelation emerged during dramatic testimony by Michael Oyamo, Obado’s former personal assistant, who is standing trial alongside his former boss for the brutal 2018 murder of the 26-year-old Rongo University student who was carrying Obado’s child.

    According to Oyamo’s testimony before Justice Cecilia Githua, Mbadi became involved when Sharon Otieno threatened to expose her relationship with the married governor to the media.

    The young woman had grown frustrated with Obado’s silence and was reportedly planning to go public with details of their affair and her pregnancy.

    “Mr Mbadi had enlisted a former MCA, the late Lawrence Mullah, to mediate,” Oyamo testified, describing how the current Treasury CS had been brought in to help resolve what was becoming an explosive situation for the then-governor.

    The mediation plan was elaborate and expensive. Mbadi allegedly tasked Mullah with finding land in Homa Bay County, purchasing it, and building a house for Sharon, who was expecting Obado’s child.

    The arrangement positioned Mullah as a go-between, receiving financial assistance from Obado to pass on to Sharon in the presence of a journalist identified only as “XYZ.”

    Money trail

    Cash.
    Cash.

    The financial arrangements soon became complex and contentious. Oyamo testified that he personally delivered the first installment of Sh200,000 from Obado to Sharon at Tausi Hotel in July 2018, followed by another Sh100,000.

    All transactions were facilitated through Mbadi’s chosen mediator, Mullah.

    However, the mediation efforts were undermined by growing disputes between Mullah and the journalist XYZ over control of the funds. Sharon, caught in the middle, began calling Oyamo repeatedly, complaining that XYZ was interfering with Mullah’s role in the financial arrangements.

    The situation deteriorated further when Sharon suggested a direct meeting with Obado to bypass the increasingly complicated mediation structure that Mbadi had established.

    The fatal meeting

    The mediation attempts reached their tragic conclusion in August 2018. While Obado was in Nairobi for a Council of Governors meeting, Sharon requested that Oyamo organize a meeting between herself, XYZ, and Mullah to resolve the ongoing financial disputes.

    In explosive testimony delivered today, Oyamo provided chilling details of how he facilitated Sharon’s final journey to Nairobi.

    On August 24, 2018—just days before her murder—Oyamo transferred Sh22,500 to Sharon to purchase a flight ticket to Nairobi where she was scheduled to meet with Governor Obado.

    The transaction itself reveals the clandestine nature of these arrangements. Oyamo admitted he didn’t use his own M-Pesa account to send the money, lacking sufficient funds and his national ID when he attempted to make the deposit.

    In a telling detail that underscores the secretive operations, an M-Pesa attendant instead deposited the funds into her own account and forwarded the money to Sharon through the protected witness XYZ.

    Sharon and XYZ traveled to Nairobi together, while Lawrence Mullah, who missed the flight, was advised by Oyamo to travel independently with assurance of reimbursement.

    All three were meant to meet with Obado, who was in the capital for official engagements.

    This meeting, intended to resolve the mediation crisis that Mbadi had helped establish, instead set in motion the events that would lead to Sharon’s brutal murder on the night of September 3-4, 2018.

    For Mbadi, who is now one of President William Ruto’s key Cabinet Secretaries, the revelation represents an uncomfortable reminder of his inadvertent role in a case that shocked the nation.

    His attempt to help resolve a delicate situation through traditional mediation appears to have instead created additional complications that may have contributed to the tragic outcome.

    The testimony suggests that Mbadi’s involvement was well-intentioned, aimed at finding a peaceful resolution to protect both Sharon’s welfare and Obado’s political reputation.

    However, the complex mediation structure he established ultimately became another source of conflict in an already volatile situation.

    As the trial continues, with Obado having already admitted to the extramarital affair and accepting paternity of Sharon’s unborn child while denying any involvement in her murder, the detailed testimony about the final days reveals how Mbadi’s mediation structure became inextricably linked to the tragic sequence of events.

    Oyamo’s admission that he facilitated Sharon’s travel to what would become her final meeting adds another layer to the complex web of relationships and financial arrangements that the Treasury CS had helped establish.

    The case resumes with continued defense testimony, as the three accused men face potential death sentences if convicted for the murder of Sharon Otieno and her unborn child.

  • Obado’s Sh505M Corruption Case Headed for Out-of-Court Settlement

    Obado’s Sh505M Corruption Case Headed for Out-of-Court Settlement

    Former Migori Governor Okoth Obado’s long-running corruption case involving Sh505 million may soon conclude through an out-of-court settlement, following formal negotiations with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

    During proceedings at the Milimani Chief Magistrate’s Court yesterday, defense lawyers informed Chief Magistrate Charles Ondieki that they had formally written to DPP Renson Ingonga on April 25, 2025, seeking an alternative resolution to the criminal trial that has dragged on since 2018.

    “We have held several meetings and deliberations with the DPP and EACC following the letter,” the defense team told the court.

    “We believe the negotiations are at an advanced stage and anticipate a conclusion within a month.”

    The defense requested an adjournment to allow settlement talks to be finalized, proposing a mention date of July 1, 2025, to update the court on the negotiations’ progress.

    In a significant revelation, Obado and his 26 co-accused disclosed that they had already settled two other asset recovery lawsuits out of court.

    These cases, previously pending before the High Court, involved unexplained wealth and proceeds of crime worth Sh1.9 billion and Sh73 million.

    The settled cases implicated Obado, his four children, businessman Jared Peter Oluoch Kwaga, and associated companies.

    According to court submissions, they agreed to pay a total of Sh253 million, which the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) accepted as a fair settlement.

    State prosecutors confirmed receipt of the April letter and acknowledged ongoing discussions between the Office of the DPP, EACC, and defense counsel aimed at terminating the case through Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR).

    “The plea bargain process initially began in October 2024, but negotiations stalled. They have now resumed, and we confirm they are progressing,” the prosecution stated, adding that they had requested further clarification from EACC on May 6 regarding issues raised by the defense.

    The EACC representative expressed willingness to participate in the ADR process, provided negotiations adhered to the legal framework outlined in Sections 137A–137O of the Criminal Procedure Code.

    Seven years with little progress

    Magistrate Ondieki, in his ruling on the adjournment request, noted the case’s troubled history.

    Filed in 2018, the trial has faced numerous delays including a magistrate transfer and language barriers affecting some of the accused.

    In the seven years since the trial began, only one witness has testified and is yet to complete their testimony.

    Obado also cited his ongoing separate murder trial, in which he is accused of killing his former lover Sharon Otieno, as another reason to postpone proceedings.

    The corruption case involves Obado, his four children, and numerous co-accused in allegations of misappropriation of public funds amounting to Sh505 million during his tenure as Migori Governor.

    The court granted the adjournment, with the case scheduled to be mentioned on July 1, 2025, when parties are expected to update the court on the settlement negotiations.

  • ‪Ex-Migori Governor Admits To Having An ‘Open Affair’ With The Late Sharon Otieno‬, Says His Wife Knew About It

    ‪Ex-Migori Governor Admits To Having An ‘Open Affair’ With The Late Sharon Otieno‬, Says His Wife Knew About It

    Former Migori Governor Okoth Obado has now admitted to having an affair with slain university student Sharon Otieno as he defended himself against her murder.

    Obado further indicated that he took responsibility for Sharon’s pregnancy and was transparent with his wife who also knew the ‘open secret.’

    The former Governor indicated that he apologized to his wife and assured her that the relationship with Sharon was over.

    He revealed further that his wife had offered to give Sharon one of their houses, a gesture he declined, insisting he had no intention of marrying a second wife.

    He opened up about a private meeting where he found his wife, a journalist, and a man identified as Lawrence Muller in a boardroom.

    His wife had already been briefed about the affair in August, claiming to have received messages from wanted to confirm the details.

    Obado said his wife stepped out briefly to make tea, allowing Muller and the journalist to brief him on what had brought them into his house.

    “My wife was in that meeting—even when I gave them money. It was actually my wife who loaned me the Sh30,000 I handed over to them,” Obado said.

    He described a meeting with Muller at Heron Court Hotel in Nairobi, where Muller discussed Sharon’s proposal for housing assistance in either Nairobi or Kisumu.

    Obado said he rejected those options and instead suggested purchasing land in Homa Bay and building a house worth Sh3 million.

    “Muller told me Sharon refused the Homa Bay option and insisted on a 50 by 100 plot in Kisumu town. But I was clear—I only supported buying land in the rural area,” Obado said.

    He further revealed that Sharon’s pregnancy-related health issues were discussed, and he promised to support her through Muller. He also arranged for her to have a medical cover.

    According to Obado, Sharon had agreed to move into a rental house while waiting for her house to be built, a transition she was reportedly comfortable with.

  • Why Ex-Governor Obado Was Acquitted in Sharon’s Unborn Child Murder Case

    Why Ex-Governor Obado Was Acquitted in Sharon’s Unborn Child Murder Case

    Last week, former Migori Governor Okoth Obado and two of his aides were found to have a case to answer in Sharon Otieno’s death but were all acquitted of the murder of her unborn baby and here is why.

    Justice Cecilia Githua in her ruling explained the reason for acquitting the three saying they ought not to have been charged with murder.

    Justice Githua said this is because at the time of the alleged murder, the baby was not a person capable of being killed or murdered under section 203 of the Penal Code that provides the offence of murder.

    A child becomes a person capable of being killed when it has completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother, whether it has breathed or not and whether it has an independent circulation or not…” the judgement reads.

    Justice Githua agreed with Lawyer Kioko Kilukumi who had defended Obado arguing that the offence of murder can only be committed against a person and not an unborn child.

    Kilukumi had argued that by virtue of the born alive principle, an unborn child or fetus was actually not a person for the purpose of section 203 of the Penal Code hence the prosecution erred in law by charging the accused persons with the offence of murdering Baby Sharon.

    The judge concurred with Kilukumi, ruling that Sharon’s baby had not completely proceeded in a living state from the body of its mother.

    The judge said that although there was undisputed evidence that at the time Sharon Otieno met her death, she was pregnant and the fetus was 28 weeks old, the government pathologist confirmed that the Baby was killed while inside her mother’s womb.

    From the above uncontested evidence, it is clear that Baby Sharon was a fetus which had not proceeded from its mother’s body and did not therefore fit the definition of a person capable of being killed…” the court ruled.

    The judge faulted the state for charging them with murder instead of the offense of killing an unborn child which carried a life imprisonment if convicted.

    I find it difficult to understand why the prosecution who obviously had possession of the evidence and must have analyzed it before making the decision to charge chose to charge the accused persons with murder in count 2 knowing full well the evidence in their possession supported a different offence. Each accused person is accordingly acquitted of the charge of murder in respect to count 2” the judge ruled.

    Obado will now have to defend himself and convince the court that he did not kill the late Sharon.

  • Obado Has A Case To Answer In The Death Of His Girlfriend Sharon Otieno, Court Rules

    Obado Has A Case To Answer In The Death Of His Girlfriend Sharon Otieno, Court Rules

    The High Court Thursday ruled former Migori Governor Okoth Obado and two co-accused persons have a case to answer in the murder of university student Sharon Otieno.

    Sharon and her unborn baby were killed on the night of September 3, 2018, in Homa Bay County.

    Obado, along with Michael Oyamo and Caspal Obiero are facing charges related to the brutal killing of the expectant university student in 2018.

    On November 8, 2024 parties completed final submissions in the case, with Obado arguing that the prosecution failed to present a strong case against him.

    Through his lawyers Kioko Kilukumi and Rodger Sagana, the former governor submitted that he had an open relationship with Sharon Otieno and was willing to support her and their unborn child.

    The defence also argued that there is no legal basis for charging murder in relation to a foetus, asserting that murder charges apply only to a person who has been born alive.

    The prosecution led by Gikui Gichui and Allan Mulama concluded its case against the accused last year (2024) with the testimony of investigating officer Moses Ole Sena.

    A total of 42 witnesses testified in the six-year-old case.

    Obado’s lead lawyer senior counsel Kioko Kilokumi asked trial judge Cecilia Githua to find that the former Migori governor has no case to answer.

    The prosecutors asked the court to find that Obado, his former personal assistant Michael Oyamo and a former Migori county employee Caspal Obiero have a case to answer and should be put on their defence.

    They presented evidence showing that Oyamo is the one who allegedly liaised with Sharon on the fateful day before she rode in a vehicle that drove her to the death field in Homa Bay.

    Justice Githua made her ruling Thursday.

    Justice Githua said the evidence adduced by the Prosecution established that a prima facie case had been made to warrant the three being placed on their defence.

    The Judge was in agreement with submissions made by the defense that by virtue of born alive principle which state that for a child to be a victim or anyone to be accused of murder, that child must be born alive.

    “I have considered these submissions and I am in agreement that indeed the evidence adduced by the Prosecution in support of baby Sharon doesn’t support the charge of murder,” she said.

  • Court Sets Judgment Date For Obado And Co-Accused On Sharon Otieno Murder

    Court Sets Judgment Date For Obado And Co-Accused On Sharon Otieno Murder

    Former Migori Governor Okoth Obado and two others will know their fate in January on whether they will be found guilty of killing late university student Sharon Otieno.

    Lady Justice Cecilia Githua will deliver the judgement for the murder case on January 30 next year.

    The prosecution has closed its case after making their closing remarks when they were highlighting their submissions on why the three should be found guilty.

    In his defense, the former county boss said the prosecution did not establish a prima facie case against him and consequently, prayed that he be acquitted from the charges.

    Through his lawyer Kioko Kilukumi, Obado said that the prosecution’s murder charges against him had been brought because his Personal Assistant and Clerical Officer at the County Assembly Michael Oyamo and Caspal Obiero are suspected of the offence, then he is suspected or assumed to have either enabled, aided, abated, counselled or procured the commission of the murder.

    According to Obado, there is no cogent evidence to sustain the charges against him.

    Kilukumi further submitted that the prosecution has not made out a prima facie case to warrant putting the Obado on his defence.

    Obado said that he can only be held personally liable for his own actions that violates Criminal Laws.

    He told Court that he cannot be held criminally liable for acts (if any) of others including Oyamo and Obiero and it matters not that they were employed by the County Government that he headed.

  • Insurers Ground All Migori County Government Vehicles

    Insurers Ground All Migori County Government Vehicles

    Embattled Migori Governor Okoth Obado has landed in yet another den after operations in his county stalls due to lack of transportation. The county’s departmental cars have been grounded after Obado’s administration failed to pay third party insurers.

    According to a spot check by the Nation, the only operating Migori county vehicles are hospital ambulances. Governor Okoth Obado’s office chase cars are also grounded.

    The rest of the vehicles lie dormant at the parking yards of various units. County drivers who are avoiding the inevitable financial crisis are now working for private individuals. According to Migori county drivers who spoke to media on anonymity, they have been reporting to work for the last three months but have not worked because the vehicles are yet to be insured.

    “We report to work as usual, bask in the sun for the better part of the day then leave to our homes without doing anything. We now offer services to private entities as long as they can pay. We cannot stay idle for three months yet we have financial obligations to meet,” one of the drivers told the source.

    West Kanyamkago MCA, Peter Mijungu, who is the Transport Committee Chairman refused to comment on the issues that has crippled the county.

    However, Erick Mwango, the Migori County Fleet Manager bolstered that the vehicles have only been grounded for two weeks. According to Mwango, the delay has been caused by the sluggish pace of the procurement department.

    We grounded the vehicles and forwarded all the requirements to the procurement department. We are still waiting for their feedback since the buck stops at their desk. The new insurance can only be gotten after tenders are advertised and that is yet to be effected. Our hands are tied since we cannot release the vehicles to the departments in their current state,” Mwango said.