Tag: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP)

  • EXPLAINER: 9 Offenses That Constitute Terrorism in Kenya

    EXPLAINER: 9 Offenses That Constitute Terrorism in Kenya

    The decision by the government to press terrorism charges against suspects linked to violent incidents during the June 25 and July 7 deadly protests has elicited a wave of condemnation from opposition leaders, civil society groups and members of the public alike.

    However, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) has unapologetically defended the move, denying claims its  intended at suppressing political expression.

    “The charges under the Prevention of Terrorism Act should be understood within the framework of established legal thresholds and national security imperatives rather than interpreted as efforts to suppress legitimate political expression,” ODPP averred in a two-page statement on Monday.

    “Preliminary investigations indicate that attacks on public officers, courts, police stations, and government personnel were not spontaneous demonstrations, but calculated and coordinated acts of violence.”

    According to the ODPP, such actions under Sections 2 and 4 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act “qualify” as acts of terrorism.

    So, what in essence constitutes an act of terrorism?

    In Kenya, as alluded to by the ODPP, a terrorist act is defined by the Prevention of Terrorism Act as any action or threat of action which;

    (i)involves violence against a person,

    (ii) endangers the life of a person, other than the person committing the action,

    (iii) creates a serious risk to the health or safety of the public or a section of the public;

    (iv) results in serious damage to property;

    (v) involves the use of firearms or explosives;

    (vi) involves the release of any dangerous, hazardous, toxic or radioactive substance or microbial or other biological agent or toxin into the environment;

    (vii) interferes with an electronic system resulting in the disruption of the provision of communication, financial, transport or other essential services;

    (viii) interferes or disrupts the provision of essential or emergency services;

    (ix) prejudices national security or public safety; and

    (b) which is carried out with the aim of—

    (i) intimidating or causing fear amongst members of the public or a section of the public; or (ii) intimidating or compelling the Government or an international organization to do, or refrain from any act; or

    (iii) destabilizing the religious, political, Constitutional, economic or social institutions of a country, or an international organization: Provided that an act which disrupts any services and is committed in pursuance of a protest, demonstration or stoppage of work shall be deemed not to be a terrorist act within the meaning of this definition so long as the act is not intended to result in any harm.

  • ODPP Orders Prosecution of Lawyers Joseph M. Munyithia and Farid Mohamed Almaary in Sh25M Land Fraud Case

    ODPP Orders Prosecution of Lawyers Joseph M. Munyithia and Farid Mohamed Almaary in Sh25M Land Fraud Case

    The Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) has directed the Makupa Police Station to charge lawyer Joseph M. Munyithia and Farid Mohamed Almaary with fraud-related offenses in connection with a disputed KSh 25 million land transaction.

    The case revolves around a sale agreement entered into on 19th May 2021 between Pauline Kanini Mutiso, Regina Mumo Mutiso, Kilungya Mutiso, and Farid Mohamed Almaary for a plot located in Shelly Beach.

    The agreement stipulated that full payment was to be made within 90 days.

    However, the complainants later discovered that Munyithia had released the original certificate of lease to Almaary without their consent and before the full payment had been made.

    Efforts by the complainants to recover the document were unsuccessful, prompting the ODPP to accuse Munyithia of conspiring with Almaary to defraud the sellers.

    Further complicating the matter, the two suspects failed to honor police summons, raising suspicions of criminal intent.

    The ODPP has now ordered their prosecution for stealing under Section 268(2)(a) as read with Section 275 of the Penal Code, and for concealing deeds under Section 288 of the Penal Code.

  • How ‘Deep State’ Trail, Torture And Kill Targets

    How ‘Deep State’ Trail, Torture And Kill Targets

    Ever wonder how the so called deep state trail and kill their targets? The case on the abduction and subsequent disappearance of two Indian nationals and one Kenyan involving 15 officers from the former Special Services Unit (SSU) of the DCI whose hearing began on Monday before Kahawa Law Courts Principal Magistrate Hon. Gideon Kiage paints a closer picture of the intricate killer web.

    The accused persons Chief Inspector Peter Muthee Gachiku, IP James Kibosek Tanuki, Cpl Joseph Kamau Mbugua, Cpl David Chepchieng Kipsoi, Cpl Joseph Mwenda Mbaya, Cpl John Mwangi Kamau, Cpl Hillary Limo Kipchumba, Pc Stephen Luseno Matunda, Pc Simon Muhuga Gikonyo, Pc Paul Njogu Muriithi, Pc/Drv Boniface Otieno Mtulla, Pc Elikana Njeru Mugendi, Pc Fredrick Thuku Kamau, John Wanjiku Macharia and Michael Kiplangat Bett are alleged to have committed the offence on the victims Zulfiqar Ahmed Khan and Mohammed Zaid Sami and Nicodemus Mwania Mwange on diverse dates between 22nd July and 23rd July 2022 at Nairobi County.

    The accused in court.

    The prosecution in their opening statement gave the court a chronology of how the heinous act which was well planned and executed with enormous resources utilized was committed, from how they were trailed by officers from the defunct SSU, continuous location of their mobile phones by the National Intelligence Service officers as well as abduction and Kenya Wildlife Service officers facilitating the alleged disposal of the victims at the Aberdare National Park in Nyeri county.

    The prosecution led by Jalson Makori and Harrison Kiarie also told the court that they will be relying on testimonies from 30 witnesses to prove the case against the accused persons.

    In his testimony, the first witness told the court that he and his co-investigators from the directorate of criminal investigations were assigned duty to investigate and apprehend the suspects accused of committing the crime. He noted that during their investigations, they identified three vehicles registration numbers KDD 632J, KDH 262S and KDG 836X that were believed to have been used in the trailing and subsequent abduction of the three victims.

    He added that on the 6th of October 2022, led by lead investigator they visited Michele gardens in South B where they located one of the vehicles KDH262S being in possession of Edward Kamau Wanjiku at the time of impounding it who upon interrogations introduced the owner Mr. Fabian Mjomba Koshen. He escorted the two to South B police station and booked the detention of the car and handed over the keys to the OCS Chief Inspector Robert Mbui of South B station under OB Number 16 of 6th October 2022. Later he escorted the two to internal affairs unit offices at KCB towers in upper hill Nairobi for interrogations.

    He further told court that they continued with the operation and located KDD 632J Nissan Note at CIC plaza in possession of Ms. Evaline Waithera Wanjiku who was taken to custody. After brief interrogation she introduced another suspect John Macharia Wanjiku. Consequently, they dropped the car at Capitol hill police station where it was booked for detention under OB 22 of 6th October 2022. She also led them to a rented apartment in Kinoo where a search was undertaken but didn’t yield much of material evidence.

    After a brief interview on the evening of 6/10/2022, he booked the three suspects to custody John Macharia Wanjiku at Kilimani police station under OB number 7 of 6 October 2022, Edward Kamau Wanjiku Capitol Hill Police station under OB number 29 of 6th October 2022 and Fabian Mjomba Koshen Capitol Hill Police station OB number 29 of 6th October 2022.

    He added that on 19th October 2022, as a team of investigators they proceeded to Aberdare National Park in Nyeri where they conducted a search and collected exhibits which were forwarded to the government chemist at Kenyatta National Hospital.

    He notes that their visit to Aberdare was informed by the vehicle tracking logs retrieved from the vehicle suspected to have been used in the crime as per the data retrieved from the National treasury, the custodian of government leased vehicles.

    Zulfiqar Ahmad Khan and his friend Mohamed Zaid Sami Kidwai, who were part of the Kenya Kwanza digital campaign team, went missing alongside taxi driver Nicodemus Mwania from Mombasa Road.

    The two contributed immensely to the success of Ruto’s campaign.

    On ascending to power, Ruto immediately disbanded the SSU Unit and the prosecution of the case began.

    WHY WAS DCI DISBANDED?

    “We can efficiently suppress crime, monitor, disrupt and apprehend criminals without abducting, torturing, killing or causing citizens to disappear,” Ruto said, while disbanding the DCI and SSU.

    He added, “It is time to retire these terrible tactics and professionalise our criminal justice system.”

    DCI’s SSU was created in 1999 due to the growing cases of crimes within the country. It was tasked to combat illegal trafficking of firearms and or ammunitions, trafficking of narcotic drugs, robberies, cases of stealing of goods in transit and illegal human trafficking.

    But the very unit which was formed to check crimes turned into a militia as it carried out extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances of both citizens and foreign nationals. Khan, Kidwai and their driver were probably the victims of SSU men.

  • How Nairobi Businessman Plotted Sh230M Property Fraud

    How Nairobi Businessman Plotted Sh230M Property Fraud

    A city tycoon was on Thursday, September 21, 2023, charged in Milimani Law court with conspiracy to defraud beneficiaries of a five-storey building along Latema Road in Nairobi county worth Ksh230 million.

    Appearing before Chief Magistrate Susan Shitubi, the businessman Nilesh Jayantilal Lalji Kotedia the Trustee of Lalji Mulji Jetha Trust Deed faced three charges of conspiracy to defraud, fraudulent disposal of trust property and false swearing levelled against him by the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP).

    Jayantilal denied that on unknown dates within the republic jointly with others yet to be arrested, conspired to defraud the beneficiaries of a five-storey building situated at Latema Road valued at Ksh230 million.

    The court heard that Jayantilal conspired to fraudulently transfer, sell, and convert the said property to use not authorized by the Trust Deed.

    He was also charged with selling the property against the wishes of the Trust.

    On the second count of fraudulent disposal, the trader denied that on or about March 15, 2019, at Catherine Ngunjirl Advocates office within Nairobi County, being a Trustee of Lalji Mulji Jetha Trust Deed including and not limited to a five storey Building on LR. No. 209/2303 IR No. 81316 along Latema Road within Nairobi CBD, valued at Kshs 230 million with intent to defraud the Beneficiaries of the Trust, fraudulently transferred and sold the said property against the wishes and use authorized by the Trust.

    “On December 11, 2012, at Victoria M. Mwangome Advocates office within Nairobi County, before Victoria Mwangome Advocate, a person authorized to administer an oath, you swore an Assent upon a matter of Public concern to the effect of a five storey Building on LR. No. 209/2303 valued at Ksh 230 Million was registered in the name of your late father Jayantilal Lalji Mulji Kotedia giving you the authority to convert it to a use not authorized by the Trust Deed,” Count three of the charge sheet stated.

    Jayantilal after denying the charges urged the court to be lenient when granting bail saying he is willing to abide by all conditions set by the court.

    He further stated that he is the breadwinner of his entire family since his wife is sick and has been caring for her.

    The businessman also said that he has since reached out to the complainants and is willing to settle the matter out of court.

    He tabled a letter in court indicating the negotiations into the matter are ongoing and has since written to the DPP informing him of the same.

    The prosecution however did not oppose the release of the accused on bail but urged the court to issue bond terms that are proportional to the offences facing him

    Magistrate Shitubi ordered Jayantilal to be released on a bond of Ksh 2 million with an alternative cash bail of Ksh 1 million.

  • Lawyer Miguna Miguna Seeks DPP Job, Promises Fair Prosecution

    Lawyer Miguna Miguna Seeks DPP Job, Promises Fair Prosecution

    Lawyer Miguna Miguna announced his application for the vacant Directorate of Public Prosecutions (DPP) position on July 10.

    The outspoken lawyer aims to replace Noordin Haji, who recently became the National Intelligence Service (NIS) Director General. Miguna did not disclose the exact date of his application submission.

    Lawyer Miguna Miguna
    Former DPP Noordin Haji [p/courtesy]
    In his Twitter post, Miguna clarified, “For the avoidance of any doubt, yes, I have applied for the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) position.” Despite his reputation for abrasive politics, he pledged to carry out his responsibilities fairly and pursue those accused of breaking the law.As per the 2010 Kenyan Constitution, the DPP directs the Inspector-General of the National Police Service (NPS) to investigate criminal allegations. The DPP’s office is responsible for initiating and conducting criminal prosecutions and related matters.

    President William Ruto has assembled a panel of seven individuals to interview and select Haji’s successor. Among the panelists are Central Organization of Trade Unions (COTU) Secretary General Francis Atwoli and Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) boss Twalib Abdallah Mbarak.

    The other members include Solicitor General Shadrack Mose, Richard Onsongo, Mary Adhiambo Maungu, Roseline Odede, and Mary Kimonye. The application deadline is Wednesday, July 12, as published in local dailies.

    Why Lawyer Miguna Miguna applied for the DPP Job

    Benefits for the DPP include a monthly salary of Ksh765,188, with proposed increments to Ksh874,500 by the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC).

    The position also grants an official car not exceeding 3000cc in engine capacity, a Ksh8 million car loan, and a Ksh35 million mortgage. Additionally, the DPP receives medical health insurance coverage of Ksh10 million for inpatients and Ksh300,000 for outpatients.

    Controversial criminal lawyer Cliff Ombeta is actively pursuing the DPP position and garnering support from his Kisii community and the UDA Party. Ombeta, who previously ran for the Bonchari Parliamentary seat in the last general elections, is vying for the role alongside Miguna Miguna.

    Miguna is renowned for his no-nonsense approach and vocal stance against corruption. Kenyans are eagerly anticipating the Kenya Kwanza administration’s decision, hoping that they will appoint Miguna as the next DPP if they are genuinely committed to curbing graft.

  • Kingsway Tyres and Automart on The Spot Over Sh2.4B Tax Evasion Scandal

    Kingsway Tyres and Automart on The Spot Over Sh2.4B Tax Evasion Scandal

    The management of the Kenya Revenue Authority is under scrutiny for awarding tax waivers worth Sh3 billion to businesses through questionable dealings.

    Due to collusion among KRA officials, certain lawyers, and firms, the government has been losing billions of shillings in the recomputation of taxes, waivers, and abandonment.

    According to court documents, KRA filed a tax demand of Sh2.4 billion against Kingsway Tyres and Automart Limited following an assessment in 2004.

    The tax assessment included more than Sh1.7 billion for income tax, more than Sh272 million for VAT, and the remaining amount for auctioneer fees. To enforce the demand, KRA attached Kingsway’s property through Speedman Commercial Agencies Limited.

    However, on September 27, 2004, the taxman agreed to negotiate with Kingsway Tyres and Automart. During these negotiations to offset their tax obligations, Kingsway Tyres and Automart committed to deposit Sh1.5 million every week on Fridays.

    KRA requested Speedman Commercial Agencies Limited to release the goods, and the previously closed offices of Kingsway were reopened.

    Kingsway Tyres and Automart took the case to court to challenge the Sh2.4 billion tax demand. Unfortunately, they lost the case, and the ruling was delivered on May 16, 2006.

    The ruling against Kingsway Tyres and Automart cleared the path for KRA to collect the Sh2.4 billion they had sought in 2004, as all obstacles were removed.

    Following the failure of Kingsway Tyres and Automart to pay the taxes, two petitioners, namely Okiya Omtatah (now Busia Senator) and Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed, took the matter to court on July 2, 2014.

    They challenged the alleged violation and infringement of fundamental rights and freedoms as stated in articles 27, 40, 46, and 47 of the Constitution, as well as the KRA Act, regarding tax evasion and the failure to comply with the court’s 2004 order to pay taxes.

    Omtatah and Mohamed also contested the validity of Kingsway Tyres and Automart’s decision to “change its name and pin from P000606825c to Kingsway Tyres Limited pin number P051116728X” in order to obtain a clean tax compliance status and evade paying Sh2.4 billion in tax arrears.

    They included several parties in the case, such as the KRA Board of Directors, Kingsway Tyres and Automart, Kingsway Tyres Limited, the Attorney General, the Director of Criminal Investigations, the Director of Public Prosecution, and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission.

    Other individuals involved in the case were former KRA Commissioner Generals Michael Waweru and John Njiraini, former EACC chair Mumo Matemo, and Speedman Commercial Agencies Limited.

    KRA, represented by their lawyers Waweru Gatonye and Company advocates, made an application in 2019 seeking consent to collect the Sh2.4 billion from Kingsway Motors. The condition was that Omtatah and Mohamed would agree to withdraw the inclusion of several other people as defendants in the case, leaving only KRA, Kingsway Tyres, Automart, and Kingsway Tyres Limited.

    The application was granted, but KRA was required to file a response, which they have failed to do so since 2019. As a result, the final determination of the cross-petition involving Speedman auctioneer, KRA, and Kingsway Tyres and Automart is still pending, awaiting KRA’s response.

    KRA Board chairman Antony Mwaura said they would pursue all firms that received undue tax abandonment, waivers, and refunds. They will also investigate if there was collusion between staff members and these firms.

    “As part of my achieving the target, I will ensure that KRA relook all the waivers, abandonment and exemptions that were offered to companies,” said Eng Mwaura. He said also on his radar were tax refunds that were offered to firms fraudulently.

    “Through the help of Treasury, we will ensure unnecessary tax exemptions are reversed,” said Mwaura.

  • LSK Sides With DPP In The Feud With DCI

    LSK Sides With DPP In The Feud With DCI

    The Law Society of Kenya has accused the Directorate of Criminal Investigations of interfering with the functions of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

    In a hard hitting statement, LSK says wrangles between the two entities on the trial of suspected murders of the late businessman Tob Cohen are likely to derail the case and pursuit for justice.

    “There is real danger of the trial being compromised due to wrangles between the DCI and the DPP on extraneous issues manifesting as power struggles between the two,” LSK President Nelson Havi says.

    Havi further says, “The discord between the two must be contextualized, and the [parameters of their powers defined to end and avert unnecessary spectacles in future.”

    The bone of contention is a letter by the DPP to the Inspector General of Police saying there was no evidence to charge Court of Appeal Judge Sankale Ole Kantai with the murder of the late Tob Cohen.
    Havi says the matter has spiraled out of control with the DCI determined to arrest and arraign Sankale in court.

    At the same time, a petition seeking the removal of DDP Noordin Haji from office has been filed with the Public Service Commission for declining to charge the Judge.

    Havi says the law is clear that the DPP doesn’t require consent from any person or authority for the commencement of criminal proceedings.

    “The DCI has in this case purported to arrogate to himself powers that he doesn’t have, by demanding that the Judge be charged when the DPP has determined on the basis of evidence and law that a murder charge is unsuitable,” He said.

    He says while the petition at PSC is by Tob Cohen’s family, it has visible footprints and fingerprints of the DCI and seeks to control the DPP on the matter.

  • DPP Error In Prosecution Hands Kidero A Win In Sh68M Graft Case

    DPP Error In Prosecution Hands Kidero A Win In Sh68M Graft Case

    Former Nairobi Governor Evans Kidero has yet again won after the Anti-Corruption Court declined a second attempt by the Directorate of Public Prosecution (DPP) to prosecute him together with Nyakach MP Joshua Aduma Owuor in a Ksh68 million graft case

    In his ruling, trial magistrate Douglas Ogoti upheld Kidero’s contention that the DPP errored in law by trying to amend the charge sheet on January 16 last year to have him and Aduma prosecuted together.

    The court declined to consolidate Ksh58 million in Kidero’s file with that of Nyakach MP Joshua Aduma Owuor who was charged with corruptly authorizing payment of Ksh10 million to a law firm of a dead lawyer eight years ago.

    Ogoti struck out the amended charge sheet where the DPP had unlawfully attempted to have the two cases consolidated and ordered the earlier charge sheet against Kidero’s Ksh68 million graft case to proceed to trial.

    “There is nowhere in the court record that the prosecution sought for the court’s permission to file the amended charge sheet. The charge sheet dated January 16, 2020, is hereby struck out,” the magistrate ruled.

    While declining to allow the two to be tried together, Ogoti said the prosecution may move to amend the charges but that has to be done within the perimeters of the law.

    “This is an ongoing matter. The prosecution was legally bound to move formally in order to seek for the court’s permission to introduce the charge sheet dated January 16, 2020,” Ogoti ruled.

    “It is not open for prosecution or any other party to introduce documents to the record in a live matter without following due process.”

    In the charge sheet that has been struck out, the DPP had amended charges in the case by introducing an accused person and amending dates in the case. The DPP claimed that the charges and evidence in the case against the two were similar therefore they should be tried together.

    Kidero and Aduma had contested the move to have their cases of Ksh 58 million and Ksh 10 million respectively consolidated saying that the DPP’S decision was an abuse of the court process.

    They further argued that the DPP offended their rights and integrity to a proper and fair trial.

    On December 4 2019, Ogoti had directed that the DPP prepares and presents a new charge sheet and have Kidero, former Chief of Staff George Wanaina, John Kariuki and thirteen others take fresh pleas.

    The DPP was ordered to prepare a fresh charge in the two cases after Ogoti declined to consolidate Kidero’s file with that of Aduma.

    However, on January 16, 2020, the DPP filed a fresh charge sheet having the two cases consolidated a move that was highly contested by the defence lawyers.

  • Former Bank Manager Pledges To Return Stolen Funds

    Former Bank Manager Pledges To Return Stolen Funds

    A former manager of Fina Bank, now Guaranty Trust Bank Kenya, and three others charged with stealing over Sh96 million from the lender over a decade ago are seeking to return millions of shillings to avoid jail.

    Graham Sagwe, the former Fina Bank manager, and traders Robert Moseti, Gladys Moraa and Obadiah Nyambane have approached the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) for an out-of-court deal.

    The deal will see them freed or get less punishment under a plea bargain scheme that will demand millions returned to the bank, now owned by Nigerian lender Guaranty Trust Bank.

    The Sh96 million was diverted from paying a Chinese contractor to a Kenyan firm associated with Don Bosco Gichana, Malch Construction, which had not handled any construction works, through Eco Bank.

    The millions were shared later among the five including Mr Gichana whose case was withdrawn after he was jailed in Tanzania on money laundering charges.

    Chief magistrate Francis Andayi last week said the four have case to answer over the Sh96 million.

    Yesterday, defence lawyers for the four asked the court for more time to allow them conclude the plea bargain talks with the DPP.

    “We have approached the DPP for plea bargain and establish how much money should be returned to the bank so that this case can be settled out of court,” said Dunstan Omari, lawyer for Ms Moraa and Mr Nyambane.

    Mr Omari said since last Friday they have held talks with the DPP to find a lasting solution to the dispute.

    “We approached the DPP on Friday and we did not conclude the issue as defence counsel travelled up country,” he added.

    Mr Omari said the constitution embraces alternative dispute resolution (ADR) as a way of resolving disputes and safe precious judicial time.

    The prosecuting counsel, Angela Fuchaka confirmed to Mr Andayi that the DPP and the defence are engaged in talks to settle the case out of court.

    In 2010 then High Court judge Mohammed Warsame had ordered the accused persons including Gichana to return all the money stolen from the bank then the case would be marked as settled.

    Mr Gichana and two law firms that were involved in the transfer returned part of the Sh96 million.

    Mr Sagwe was charged with stealing Sh96.7million from Fina Bank on November 15 2010.

    The four including the manager Graham Sagwe and traders Robert Moseti, Gladys Moraa and Obadiah Nyambane have approached the director of public prosecutions (DPP) for an out-of-court deal.

    Mr Nyambane and Ms Moraa are charged with stealing Sh96.7m from Eco Bank Limited where Malch held an account.

    Ms Moraa was a non-executive director of Malch while Mr Nyambane was CEO of the firm.

    They have denied the theft charges and are out on bond.

    The Nigerian bank in 2013 acquired a majority stake in Fina Bank, set up in 1991, through a share purchase from current shareholders and direct investment in a deal valued at $100 million (Sh11 billion).

  • Blogger Nyakundi Lock Horns With DPP Haji Over Victoria Bank’s Dismissed Case

    Blogger Nyakundi Lock Horns With DPP Haji Over Victoria Bank’s Dismissed Case

    Blogger Cyprian Nyakundi has locked horns with the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) Noordin Haji over an alleged extortion case involving Victoria Commercial Bank.

    Justice Antony Mrima had on March 11 declared unconstitutional the way the evidence in the matter was obtained.

    “The DPP ought to have acted in compliance with the superior court decision which was pronounced six months ago,” defence lawyer Dudly Ochiel told the magistrate on Wednesday.

    Justice Mrima ruled that the DCI had entrapped the blogger by illegally obtaining evidence against him.

    He ruled that the evidence was not admissible and therefore the criminal trial should have been halted.

    Owing to the High Court’s ruling, the case against Mr Nyakundi and others collapsed.

    Nyakundi had written widely about the bank’s alleged links money laundering among other fraudulent activities upon which the bank on seeing their reputation was in-line, talked to him to go slow on his attacks in exchange of a token. Later the bank would change mind and laid a trap leading to his arrest.

    His victory would come when the court ruled that he was entrapped by the authorities in collaboration with the bank and that in no way he was plotting to commit a crime but was wittily led to the trap.

    Despite the case collapsing, Nyakundi and his co-accused have been attending court sessions for the last six months in line with the law since they’re out on bail and the DPP hasn’t formally withdrawn the case as required.

    When they appeared before Milimani Principal Magistrate Zainab Abdul on Wednesday, the suspects complained that they had been cleared by the High Court but that the DPP was reluctant to terminate the case.

    Mr Nyakundi, through Mr.Dudly Ochiel , said six months had lapsed and that the DPP had dragged his feet on the matter by failing to terminate the criminal charges against them.

    “The DPP ought to have acted in compliance with the superior court decision which was pronounced six months ago,” defence lawyer Mr. Ochiel told the magistrate on Wednesday.

    “Despite the March 2021 ruling, I have been attending court like an accused person while the office of the DPP prosecutor going by the name Muya claims that his boss Mr. Noordin Haji has not authorized for the case to be terminated.” Reads Nyakundi’s complaint seen by Kenya Insights to the ODPP.

    “While this is shocking and frustrating at the same time, I have always attended the court like an accused person wondering why the court and the ODPP are dragging in this matter yet the high court ruling was final and clear.” He states.

    The blogger is now demanding to know in his complaint what the interest of the DPP is in the matter terming the conduct as unprofessional. “Why would DPP Noordin Haji require approval for a matter that has already been in order for things to move?” He poses.

    However, seeking more time to get instructions from the DPP, a State prosecutor said an appeal had been lodged to challenge the High Court’s decision.

    In a brief ruling, Ms Abdul noted that the DPP was yet to advise the subordinate court on the way forward in light of the High Court decision.

    She then gave the DPP up to September 15 to communicate his decision.