Kenya’s aviation sector faces imminent disruption as the Kenya Aviation Workers Union (KAWU) has issued a seven-day strike notice to the Kenya Airports Authority (KAA), threatening to paralyze operations at the country’s busiest airport from October 1.
The industrial action comes amid explosive claims by union leaders that the government is testing public opinion for a potential revival of the controversial Adani Group deal to lease Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA), using former Prime Minister Raila Odinga as a conduit.
KAWU Secretary General Moss Ndiema has accused Odinga of serving as a front for interests seeking to resurrect the multi-billion-dollar airport modernization project that President William Ruto terminated in November last year following corruption allegations against the Indian conglomerate.
“When you hear Raila Odinga talking about Adani, he is testing the waters. He is being used to test the waters. And for a fact, Raila had a share in the Adani deal,” Ndiema declared, responding to Odinga’s Monday criticism of protesters who opposed the original agreement.
The ODM leader had defended the scrapped deal, arguing that Kenya “squandered a massive opportunity to modernise its main airport” and claiming Adani came to invest rather than exploit the country’s resources. However, Ndiema dismissed these assertions, alleging that Adani intended to use JKIA as collateral to secure loans rather than inject fresh capital.
“They were not coming here to invest even a cent. They wanted to use JKIA as collateral to borrow money. If that is the case, the KAA can use that collateral to borrow money directly. Do we need a middleman?” Ndiema questioned.
The union’s strike threat extends beyond the Adani controversy, encompassing six critical demands that paint a picture of systemic dysfunction at KAA. Chief among these is what Ndiema terms a “loss of faith in the KAA Board of Directors,” citing poor governance and systemic inefficiencies that led to questionable decisions including the now-defunct Adani lease arrangement.
The workers are particularly incensed by the proposed transfer of the Ground Flight Safety department from KAA to the Kenya Civil Aviation Authority, a move they warn could trigger massive job losses and revenue hemorrhaging. Additionally, the union demands confirmation of over 500 contract employees to permanent terms, issuance of substantive appointment letters to promoted staff, and settlement of six months’ overtime dues for Wilson Airport personnel.
Perhaps most damaging to staff morale is the alleged “crippling and dismantling” of the Human Resources department, which union officials say has paralyzed staff welfare and stalled collective bargaining processes.
The timing of the strike threat is particularly sensitive, coming as Kenya’s aviation sector seeks to recover from years of operational challenges and as JKIA handles increasing passenger traffic. Any industrial action would likely affect thousands of travelers and could damage Kenya’s reputation as a regional aviation hub.
President Ruto’s dramatic cancellation of the Adani deals in November followed mounting pressure from civil society groups, opposition politicians, and aviation workers who questioned the transparency of the procurement process. The President cited “credible information” about corruption within the Indian conglomerate as justification for the termination.
However, Ndiema’s latest allegations suggest that powerful interests may be maneuvering behind the scenes to revive aspects of the partnership, using Odinga’s recent public statements as a trial balloon to gauge public sentiment.
The union has demanded that Odinga release Adani’s original proposal for public scrutiny, challenging the former premier to demonstrate the supposed benefits of the arrangement he continues to champion.
With the seven-day ultimatum now running, KAA management faces the urgent task of addressing the workers’ grievances or risk a complete shutdown of airport operations. The authority has yet to respond publicly to the strike notice, but the implications for Kenya’s aviation sector and broader economy could be severe if the dispute remains unresolved.
The unfolding crisis exposes deeper governance challenges within Kenya’s aviation sector and raises uncomfortable questions about the transparency of major infrastructure deals, even as the specter of the controversial Adani partnership refuses to disappear from public discourse.
Machakos, Kenya — Former Prime Minister Raila Odinga has clarified that the Orange Democratic Movement’s (ODM) political pact with President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance (UDA) will expire in 2027, dismissing claims that the agreement extends beyond the next general election.
Speaking on Sunday during an ODM parliamentary group meeting in Machakos County, Raila said the deal should not be misconstrued as a blanket endorsement of Ruto’s re-election bid, stressing that any decision on 2027 will be determined by ODM’s internal processes.
“Look at what we have signed. We must remain ODM. We signed and agreed that we will work together up to 2027,” Raila told the gathering, which brought together party legislators and top officials ahead of ODM’s 20th anniversary celebrations slated for October.
The veteran opposition leader faulted some members of his party for prematurely suggesting that ODM had already resolved to back Ruto’s second-term ambitions under the “Tutam” slogan championed by UDA loyalists.
“We have not passed any resolutions as a party to say how we are going to go into the elections of 2027,” Raila said, urging restraint among members. “Wherever you are, don’t commit the party to some things which have not been discussed. Let them be discussed first.”
His remarks were met with applause and cheers from the assembled lawmakers, signaling broad support within the party ranks for his insistence on internal consensus.
ODM’s working arrangement with the Ruto administration has fueled speculation about the party’s long-term strategy, especially as it seeks to reposition itself ahead of 2027.
Former Prime Minister Raila Odinga share a jovial moment with other members of the ODM party during the retreat on September 22, 2025 / ODM X
Raila insisted the pact was tactical and limited in scope, noting that ODM would chart its electoral path when the time comes.
“We shall give direction later on whether we will field a presidential candidate or not,” he added.
Raila’s clarification appears aimed at tamping down internal dissent while keeping ODM’s options open.
By stating that the deal with Ruto is strictly time-bound, he is seeking to reassure his supporters that ODM is not being absorbed into the ruling coalition.
For President Ruto, Raila’s remarks are a mixed signal.
On one hand, ODM’s cooperation until 2027 provides the government with legislative stability and a semblance of national unity.
On the other, Raila has now drawn a line in the sand, effectively warning UDA that ODM is not committed to backing his re-election bid.
Within ODM, the statement reflects the tension between pragmatists, who favor cooperation with Ruto to secure development gains, and loyalists, who see such an alliance as undermining the party’s independence.
Raila’s caution suggests he is aware of the risk of alienating ODM’s traditional base in Nyanza, Coast, and Western Kenya, which has long viewed him as the face of opposition politics.
Raila’s approach to political alliances has often followed a familiar pattern: short-term tactical deals, followed by an eventual reassertion of independence.
•2008 Grand Coalition with Mwai Kibaki: After the disputed 2007 elections, Raila entered a power-sharing deal with Kibaki under international mediation. While it stabilized the country, Raila later struggled with frustrations over being sidelined as Prime Minister, and ODM eventually drifted back into opposition.
•2018 Handshake with Uhuru Kenyatta: The truce ended months of post-election turmoil and gave Raila influence over major state reforms, including the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI). But by 2022, ODM’s closeness to Uhuru hurt its outsider appeal and arguably weakened Raila’s presidential bid against Ruto.
•2023 Pact with Ruto: This latest arrangement appears designed to guarantee ODM space in the political mainstream while buying time until 2027. However, Raila’s insistence on its expiry date suggests he is wary of repeating past mistakes where tactical deals diluted ODM’s brand and cost him politically.
What It Means for 2027
By limiting the pact to 2027, Raila is signaling that ODM will not automatically back Ruto’s re-election.
This ambiguity keeps ODM’s options open: the party could field its own candidate, negotiate a broader opposition coalition, or strike a fresh deal depending on the political climate.
But the risk remains: if ODM appears too close to Ruto, it could alienate its grassroots. If it breaks away too sharply, it risks losing the benefits of government partnership.
For now, Raila’s careful positioning keeps ODM relevant but it also prolongs uncertainty over who will be the real challenger to Ruto in 2027.
ODM Secretary-General risks party position as he spearheads new youth movement challenging Kenya Kwanza administration
Edwin Sifuna has thrown down the gauntlet to his own Orange Democratic Movement party, declaring he would rather lose his position as Secretary-General than support President William Ruto’s re-election bid in 2027.
Speaking at a women’s empowerment event in Saboti, Trans Nzoia County on Sunday, the defiant ODM official made it clear that his opposition to the Kenya Kwanza administration transcends party loyalty—a stance that puts him on a collision course with any potential ODM-UDA rapprochement.
“I will not support ODM’s resolution to endorse William Ruto in 2027,” Sifuna declared, addressing speculation about his party’s future political direction.
“I am ready to be replaced in ODM, as I have heard someone is being groomed for my position.”
The remarks signal a deepening rift within ODM as the party grapples with its positioning ahead of the 2027 general election.
While party leader Raila Odinga has recently shown signs of warming up to the Ruto administration, Sifuna’s public rebellion suggests not all party officials are willing to follow that path.
Youth movement emerges
Sifuna’s defiance coincides with the launch of “Kenya Moja,” a new political formation he’s spearheading alongside several opposition MPs.
The movement positions itself as a youth-led alternative to what its founders describe as failed leadership under the current administration.
“Kenya needs a new political force to champion the rights of citizens suffering under poor leadership,” Sifuna emphasized, framing his opposition as a matter of principle rather than personal ambition.
The timing of this political realignment is significant. With three years until the next election, opposition figures are already positioning themselves for what promises to be a highly contested race.
Sifuna’s willingness to potentially sacrifice his party position suggests he’s betting on anti-establishment sentiment carrying more weight than traditional party structures.
Coalition of the willing
The Saboti event revealed the breadth of discontent within opposition ranks. MPs Caleb Amisi (Saboti), Majimbo Kalasinga (Kabuchai), Jack Wamboka (Bumula), and Gathoni Wamuchomba (Githunguri) all voiced sharp criticism of the Kenya Kwanza administration.
Kalasinga’s focus on human rights violations—specifically extrajudicial killings—adds a grave dimension to their opposition. “The human rights space has shrunk under this government. If President Ruto gets a second term, it will only get worse,” he warned.
Wamuchomba’s critique was equally scathing, targeting the government’s performance in healthcare and education.
Her direct appeal to the President—“Stop lying, Mr President”—reflects the confrontational tone this emerging opposition faction is adopting.
The Raila factor
Perhaps most intriguingly, Sifuna hinted at working with Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya, suggesting he’s already building alternative political networks.
This tactical positioning indicates he’s prepared for potential expulsion from ODM rather than merely hoping to influence party direction from within.
The Secretary-General’s rebellion places Raila Odinga in a delicate position.
As ODM leader, he must decide whether to discipline Sifuna or accommodate the growing dissent within party ranks.
Amisi’s claims of receiving death threats and being trailed by unknown vehicles which he interpreted as assassination attempts add a serious security dimension to this political drama.
Whether these concerns are legitimate or political theater, they reflect the high stakes involved in opposition politics.
The emergence of Kenya Moja also represents something broader: a generational challenge to established political leadership.
By positioning themselves as young, visionary leaders offering “economic transformation,” these politicians are tapping into widespread frustration with traditional politics.
Sifuna’s gamble could reshape Kenya’s opposition landscape.
If successful, his rebellion might inspire other party officials to break ranks, potentially fracturing ODM and creating space for new political formations. If it fails, he risks political isolation.
The Secretary-General’s willingness to sacrifice his position for principle—assuming that’s what this represents rather than calculated opportunism—will be tested in coming months.
Can Kenya Moja build sufficient momentum to challenge both the ruling party and established opposition? That remains the million-shilling question.
What’s certain is that Sifuna has chosen confrontation over accommodation, setting up what promises to be a fascinating power struggle within Kenya’s opposition ranks as the 2027 election cycle heats up.
The author is a political correspondent covering Kenya’s evolving political landscape
Symbolic Meeting Reignites Political Calculations as Kenya Eyes Next Presidential Race
President William Ruto’s meeting with his predecessor Uhuru Kenyatta at State House on August 1, 2025, has sent ripples through Kenya’s political landscape, with observers reading deeper meanings into what officials describe as a routine diplomatic engagement.
The encounter, which saw the two former allies share hearty handshakes, booming laughter, and even playful nudges during a tour of the renovated State House, has reignited speculation about shifting alliances ahead of the 2027 General Election.
A tale of two narratives
Officially, Kenyatta’s visit was linked to his attendance at a joint East African Community and Southern African Development Community meeting on the Democratic Republic of Congo crisis.
However, the symbolism of the former president touring his old residence—complete with viral social media posts showing their renewed camaraderie, has not escaped political watchers.
President Ruto and Uhuru having a booming laughter during a tour to show the former president of the new look State House.
“The presence of Uhuru at State House with President Ruto has made most tribalists and bigots mad because they don’t want an inclusive, united and cohesive Kenya,” declared Nandi Senator Samson Cherargei, interpreting the meeting as validation of Ruto’s growing national acceptance.
The reunion marks a dramatic shift from the frosty relationship that characterized the final years of Kenyatta’s presidency, when he backed Raila Odinga against his then-deputy Ruto in the 2022 elections.
Complex political calculations
Behind the public display of unity lie complex political calculations.
Sources suggest Kenyatta, despite his public retreat from frontline politics, remains influential—particularly in the Mount Kenya region and may be positioning himself for a role in shaping the 2027 succession.
“Since he is the one who requested a tour around State House to acclimatise with the new changes, we believe he was putting his best foot forward to the international community to see that he has no hard feelings against his successor,” revealed a State House official speaking on condition of anonymity.
The meeting comes amid reports that Kenyatta is quietly supporting former Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i as a potential challenger to Ruto in 2027, while also navigating the complex dynamics in Mount Kenya, where former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua seeks to consolidate regional influence.
ODM’s measured response
The reunion has particularly unsettled some within the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM), which entered into a broad-based government arrangement with Ruto following post-election violence and protests.
President Ruto in. Meeting with ODM leader Raila Odinga and Musalia Mudavadi in a meeting at State House.
Treasury Cabinet Secretary John Mbadi, the former ODM chairman, delivered a scathing assessment of Kenyatta’s renewed visibility.
“The former president should know his time is over. Neither President Ruto nor Raila Odinga should be listening to him,” Mbadi declared, accusing Kenyatta of misleading the opposition during the 2022 contest.
However, other ODM leaders maintain a more cautious stance. Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo noted that while her party supports the current administration for national stability, this doesn’t guarantee automatic support in 2027.
“It is a matter of negotiation,” she stated, even floating the possibility of ODM asking Ruto to support Odinga in the next election.
The Ruto-Kenyatta relationship has been marked by dramatic shifts—from close allies during their first Jubilee term (2013-2017) to bitter rivals by 2022.
Political analyst Prof Gitile Naituli suggests the current rapprochement might not be surprising: “They’ve been together all along. We are just seeing Jubilee Phase Two.”
Meanwhile, Gachagua’s Democracy for the Citizens Party dismissed the meeting as “mere optics,” with Deputy Party leader Cleophas Malala maintaining that “that meeting cannot salvage Ruto from serving only one term.”
The 2027 landscape
As Kenya approaches the 2027 elections, the State House reunion represents just one piece of a complex political puzzle.
With Odinga having warmed to Ruto through bipartisan dialogue, Kenyatta potentially repositioning himself, and new political formations emerging, the traditional alliance patterns appear increasingly fluid.
The viral images of the two leaders—Ruto in his signature blue suit, Kenyatta in a patterned dark shirt, sharing moments of levity on the State House lawn—may prove to be more than mere nostalgia.
In Kenya’s intricate political theater, such displays often signal deeper strategic realignments that could reshape the country’s electoral landscape.
Whether this reunion represents genuine reconciliation, tactical positioning, or simply diplomatic courtesy remains to be seen.
What’s certain is that in the world of Kenyan politics, even the most casual encounters are scrutinized for their potential impact on the nation’s democratic future.
The next two years will reveal whether the laughter and handshakes at State House translate into substantive political cooperation or remain merely a brief interlude in Kenya’s ever-evolving political drama.
The Political Chess Game That Could Reshape Kenya’s Leadership
In the intricate web of Kenyan politics, few stories capture the imagination quite like the meteoric rise of Homa Bay Governor Gladys Wanga. As the political machinery for 2027 begins to churn, a compelling narrative is emerging: Could the ODM chairperson be positioning herself or being positioned as President William Ruto’s running mate for his re-election bid?
The question isn’t merely speculative gossip.
It represents a confluence of political pragmatism, gender dynamics, and strategic alliance-building that could fundamentally alter Kenya’s leadership landscape.
The Foundation: From Opposition Stalwart to Unlikely Ally
Wanga’s political journey reads like a masterclass in strategic positioning.
Having served as Homa Bay Woman Representative from 2013 to 2022 before ascending to the governor’s mansion, she has consistently demonstrated both grassroots appeal and administrative competence.
But it’s her recent elevation to ODM national chairperson that has set tongues wagging in political circles.
The timing is hardly coincidental.
Her appointment came as President Ruto was bringing key opposition figures into his broad-based government, a move that has fundamentally redrawn Kenya’s political map.
In a landscape where yesterday’s enemies become today’s allies, Wanga represents something potent: legitimacy within the opposition combined with pragmatic cooperation with the ruling administration.
Wanga has been unequivocal in her support for Ruto’s agenda, stating that ODM fully supports the President’s development initiatives.
This isn’t merely political theater—it’s a strategic recalibration that positions her as a bridge between two historically antagonistic political traditions.
The Broad-Based Government: More Than Political Window Dressing
The March 8 UDA-ODM deal that brought Orange Party figures into Cabinet positions wasn’t just about sharing power, it was about reshaping electoral mathematics for 2027.
For Ruto, the inclusion of ODM heavyweights serves multiple purposes: it neutralizes potential opposition, brings crucial regional representation, and provides options for his running mate selection.
Wanga’s role in this arrangement is particularly intriguing.
Unlike other ODM figures who joined government as Cabinet Secretaries, she has maintained her gubernatorial position while ascending within the party hierarchy.
This dual positioning as both a successful county executive and national party leader, creates a unique political profile that could prove invaluable in a national campaign.
The Gender Factor: Kenya’s Overdue Political Revolution
Gladys Wanga and William Ruto during a function in Homa Bay County.
Perhaps the most compelling argument for Wanga’s deputy presidency candidacy lies in Kenya’s long-overdue reckoning with gender representation.
Despite comprising over 50% of the population, women remain dramatically underrepresented in Kenya’s highest offices.
The country has never had a female president or deputy president, a statistic that becomes more glaring with each electoral cycle.
The demand for female leadership isn’t just coming from women’s rights activists.
Women movements are making a strong case that Kenya is “ripe for a woman Deputy President”, and this sentiment is gaining traction across political divides.
Ruto himself has previously hinted at the possibility of selecting a female running mate, suggesting that the gender factor isn’t just wishful thinking, it’s a serious political consideration.
Caren Oloo of Maendeleo Ya Wanawake captured this sentiment perfectly: “Kenya is ripe to get a woman leader at the top. For too long, we have been underrepresented in positions of power.”
This isn’t just about representation, it’s about recognizing that excluding half the population from top leadership positions is both morally indefensible and politically shortsighted.
The Kindiki Conundrum: Why Change Might Be Inevitable
Current Deputy President Kithure Kindiki’s position, while seemingly secure, faces several structural challenges that could make a change inevitable.
Recent analysis suggests it may be impossible for Ruto to retain Kindiki as his running mate in 2027, though the deputy president has been actively campaigning for the ticket through nationwide tours.
The challenge for Kindiki isn’t personal competence—he’s widely regarded as capable and loyal.
Rather, it’s about electoral mathematics and political coalition-building.
As Ruto seeks to broaden his base beyond the Kenya Kwanza coalition, the running mate slot becomes a crucial tool for cementing new alliances and appealing to previously hostile constituencies.
Regional Dynamics: The Luo Factor in National Politics
Wanga’s potential candidacy takes on added significance when viewed through the lens of regional politics.
Should Raila Odinga indeed exit active politics as many expect, the Luo community—Kenya’s third-largest ethnic group—would need new national leadership.
Wanga, with her proven track record and national profile, could emerge as the natural successor to Odinga’s political legacy.
This transition wouldn’t just be symbolic.
The Luo community has historically played a pivotal role in Kenyan politics, and their support could prove decisive in 2027.
By selecting Wanga as his running mate, Ruto would effectively secure not just individual loyalty but potentially an entire regional bloc that has traditionally been in opposition.
The Competition: Waiguru and the UDA Dilemma
Wanga isn’t the only female politician being mentioned for the deputy presidency.
Kirinyaga Governor Anne Waiguru, a UDA stalwart serving her second and final term, remains a strong contender.
The choice between Wanga and Waiguru represents more than just individual preferences, it’s about the kind of coalition Ruto wants to build for 2027.
Waiguru offers continuity and loyalty from within the current ruling coalition.
She’s proven her ability to work within the UDA structure and has maintained strong ties with Central Kenya politics.
However, her selection would represent an inward-looking choice—rewarding existing allies rather than expanding the coalition.
Wanga, conversely, represents bold expansion. Her selection would signal Ruto’s commitment to transcending traditional political boundaries and building a truly national coalition.
It would also fulfill his implicit promise to elevate women to the highest levels of government.
The Raila Factor: Blessing or Burden?
Gladys Wanga and Raila Odinga during a football match in the past.
One of the most intriguing aspects of Wanga’s potential candidacy is her relationship with Raila Odinga.
While his backing has been crucial to her rise within ODM, it could also become a liability if perceived as excessive male influence on her candidacy.
As Caren Oloo warned: “Right now, we know Raila is behind Wanga. Should he walk away from the Broad-Based Government, her dreams could be shattered.”
This observation highlights a crucial tension, while Odinga’s support is valuable, Wanga must establish herself as an independent political force to be truly viable as a national leader.
The key for Wanga will be demonstrating that her political strength derives from her own achievements and appeal, rather than merely from being Odinga’s preferred successor.
Her track record as governor and her grassroots mobilization skills suggest she has the foundation to make this transition successfully.
Electoral Mathematics: Building the Winning Coalition
Politics, ultimately, is about numbers, and the 2027 electoral mathematics are complex.
Ruto’s victory in 2022 was built on a carefully constructed coalition that combined his Rift Valley base with crucial support from Central Kenya and other regions.
For 2027, he needs to maintain this coalition while potentially expanding it to ensure decisive victory.
A Wanga candidacy would bring several electoral advantages.
First, it would likely secure significant support from Nyanza, traditionally an opposition stronghold.
Second, it would appeal to women voters across ethnic lines, a demographic that constitutes over 50% of the electorate. Third, it would position Ruto as a progressive leader willing to break traditional barriers.
However, this strategy isn’t without risks.
Some traditional Ruto supporters might view the selection of an ODM figure as betrayal, potentially depressing turnout in his core constituencies. The challenge will be managing this transition without alienating existing supporters while attracting new ones.
The Opposition Factor: Neutralizing Future Threats
From a strategic perspective, bringing Wanga onto the ticket would serve another crucial purpose: neutralizing potential opposition coalitions.
If she becomes Ruto’s running mate, it would be significantly more difficult for any opposition alliance to present a credible challenge from Nyanza or to build a broad-based anti-Ruto coalition.
This isn’t just about 2027—it’s about fundamentally altering Kenya’s political landscape for years to come.
By absorbing key opposition figures into his coalition, Ruto could create a dominant political formation that mirrors the kind of hegemonic arrangements that characterized earlier periods of Kenyan politics.
Kenya’s GlobalImage
Kenya’s international partners have increasingly emphasized the importance of gender equality and women’s empowerment.
A female deputy president would send a powerful signal about Kenya’s commitment to these values, potentially enhancing the country’s standing in international forums and with development partners.
This consideration shouldn’t be underestimated in an era where Kenya seeks to position itself as a regional leader and global partner.
Having a woman in the second-highest office would represent significant progress and could yield tangible benefits in terms of international relationships and development cooperation.
Challenges and Obstacles
Despite the compelling case for Wanga’s candidacy, several obstacles remain.
First, there’s the question of whether ODM will demand formal pre-election agreements that could complicate the arrangement.
Political marriages of convenience are notoriously fragile, and the terms of any such alliance would need careful negotiation.
Second, there’s the challenge of managing internal UDA dynamics.
Long-time Ruto allies might resist what they perceive as excessive accommodation of former opponents.
The art of political leadership often lies in managing these internal tensions while pursuing broader strategic objectives.
Third, there’s the question of Wanga’s own political calculations.
While the deputy presidency would represent a significant elevation, it would also mean subordinating herself to Ruto’s leadership and agenda.
For a politician who has built her career in opposition, this transition requires careful consideration of long-term implications.
The Verdict: Grooming or Genuine Partnership?
Homa Bay Governor Gladys Wanga.
So, is Gladys Wanga being “groomed” to be Ruto’s deputy in 2027?
The evidence suggests something more complex than simple grooming—it appears to be a case of mutual political advantage creating conditions for potential partnership.
Wanga brings undeniable assets to any potential ticket: proven leadership ability, gender representation, regional appeal, and the capacity to bridge traditional political divides.
For Ruto, her selection would represent bold coalition-building that could secure his re-election while positioning his administration as progressive and inclusive.
The question isn’t whether she’s qualified—her track record speaks for itself.
Rather, it’s whether the political stars will align to make this partnership beneficial for all parties involved.
In a political environment where today’s allies can become tomorrow’s opponents, such calculations are never simple.
The Making of History
Whether or not Gladys Wanga becomes William Ruto’s running mate in 2027, her emergence as a serious candidate represents something significant in Kenyan politics.
It signals the maturation of women’s political leadership and the gradual breakdown of traditional barriers that have long excluded half the population from the highest offices.
For Kenya, the prospect of its first female deputy president—regardless of who ultimately gets the nod—represents long-overdue progress.
For Wanga personally, it represents the culmination of a political journey that began in the opposition trenches and could end in the corridors of State House.
The 2027 election remains more than two years away, and much can change in that time. Political alliances will shift, new crises will emerge, and electoral dynamics will evolve.
But one thing seems certain: Gladys Wanga has positioned herself as a serious player in Kenya’s political future, and her influence on the country’s trajectory is only beginning to be felt.
As Kenya stands at this political crossroads, the question isn’t just about individual ambitions or party calculations—it’s about the kind of leadership the country needs for its next chapter.
In Gladys Wanga, voters may well see not just a potential deputy president, but a symbol of the change they’ve long been promised but rarely delivered.
The game is afoot, the players are positioning themselves, and history waits to be written.
A Political Analysis of Kenya’s Evolving Power Dynamics
In the complex chess game of Kenyan politics, few predictions carry as much weight as those from seasoned political analyst Professor Peter Kagwanja.
His latest forecast that President William Ruto and impeached former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua will likely “shake hands” before the 2027 elections has sent ripples through the country’s political landscape.
Speaking to a local television station on July 29, 2025, Kagwanja laid out a compelling case rooted in electoral mathematics rather than emotional reconciliation.
His central thesis is straightforward: President Ruto knows very well that he cannot win without numbers and needs the support of the Mount Kenya region.
This assessment reflects the harsh realities of Kenya’s demographic-driven politics.
Mount Kenya remains a hotly contested region that could determine the outcome of the 2027 elections, with both leaders devising parallel strategies to secure its support.
The region’s voting bloc has historically been decisive in determining presidential outcomes, making any serious contender’s path to State House nearly impossible without its backing.
Gachagua’s rising political stock
Rigathi Gachagua addressing supporters today.
Perhaps most significantly, Kagwanja highlighted how “the anger in Mount Kenya over betrayal is what will shape the 2027 election,” with Gachagua and his allies positioned to “emerge as a major political bloc”. This assessment gains credence when viewed against recent political developments.
The Mount Kenya region, which has traditionally supported Gachagua, has turned against those who voted for his impeachment, creating a political nightmare for Ruto’s allies in the region.
Gachagua had previously given area politicians until December to align with the region’s political sentiments or risk being swept to oblivion in 2027.
Kagwanja’s most intriguing prediction centers on the mechanics of this potential reconciliation.
He suggests that “a coalition between Gachagua and Ruto is possible, even if UDA loses its grip on the region,” potentially featuring “Gachagua, who is not a member of UDA and Ruto, who will have only a small UDA faction remaining in Mount Kenya, where the party has been largely liquidated”.
This scenario reflects the fluid nature of Kenyan political alliances, where ideological differences often take a backseat to pragmatic electoral calculations.
The proposed handshake would be “based on the idea of national equality, not just party loyalty”, suggesting a broader political realignment beyond traditional party structures.
Raila’s potential marginalization
In Kagwanja’s projection, veteran opposition leader Raila Odinga emerges as the potential casualty of this realignment.
The analyst predicted that “in 2027, we are likely to see Gachagua and Ruto come together based on national equality, while Raila will be marginalised”.
This assessment comes against the backdrop of a third force forming away from both Ruto and Gachagua, with youthful elected leaders claiming it’s time to liberate Kenya from ethnic politics.
However, Kagwanja’s analysis suggests that ethnic and regional calculations will continue to dominate Kenya’s political landscape.
The prediction gains context from recent developments in Mount Kenya politics.
Gachagua has positioned himself as the region’s defender, making seven resolutions for Mount Kenya in his showdown with President Ruto and telling the President to “forget Mt Kenya support in 2027”.
However, some Mount Kenya leaders like MP Kiunjuri argue that the region should “cease rebellion without a cause and join hands with President Ruto”, indicating that the region’s political direction remains contested.
Kagwanja’s analysis reflects Kenya’s persistent challenge of balancing ethnic considerations with national unity aspirations.
The politics of betrayal continue to fuel the Ruto-Gachagua feud, with both sides positioning for 2027.
The professor’s prediction essentially argues that political survival will trump personal grievances. In a system where electoral success depends heavily on regional coalitions, the mathematical reality of Mount Kenya’s voting power could force even the most bitter political enemies to find common ground.
Whether Kagwanja’s prediction materializes remains to be seen.
What remains clear is that Kagwanja has urged Kenyans to “watch the evolving political landscape closely, noting that the realignments are far from over”.
If his analysis proves accurate, Kenya could witness one of the most dramatic political reconciliations in its recent history—driven not by forgiveness, but by the unforgiving arithmetic of electoral politics.
The coming months will test whether pragmatism indeed trumps pride in Kenya’s high-stakes political theater, as the country inches closer to what promises to be a highly contested 2027 general election.
KAKAMEGA – Orange Democratic Movement leader Raila Odinga delivered a masterful display of democratic leadership on Friday, skillfully navigating internal party tensions while reaffirming his commitment to Kenya’s political stability through a continued partnership with President William Ruto’s administration.
Speaking at a packed delegates conference in Kakamega County, the former Prime Minister demonstrated the political acumen that has defined his decades-long career, addressing growing criticism of the ODM-UDA cooperation agreement with remarkable composure and strategic clarity.
In a move that showcased his dedication to democratic principles, Raila mounted a spirited defense of his Secretary-General Edwin Sifuna’s right to express dissenting views, even as those opinions have sparked heated debate within party ranks.
“We have to protect the rights of people to speak. If Sifuna has spoken, he has a right to speak,” Raila declared to thunderous applause, embodying the very essence of democratic discourse.
The seasoned politician’s handling of the situation revealed his deep understanding of political dynamics, as he clarified that the March 7, 2025 cooperation agreement was not a political merger but rather a sophisticated framework designed to address Kenya’s pressing challenges.
“We did not sign a coalition agreement with UDA. What we have is a structured understanding focused on issues affecting Kenyans, not positions, not politics,” he explained with characteristic eloquence.
Raila’s announcement that the broad-based government arrangement will continue until 2027 provides much-needed certainty in Kenya’s political landscape, while his promise of a comprehensive review demonstrates his responsiveness to grassroots concerns.
His acknowledgment that party members will ultimately decide the future beyond 2027 reflects his commitment to inclusive decision-making processes.
The ODM leader’s diplomatic response to calls from the crowd to abandon the cooperation agreement illustrated his political maturity, as he assured supporters that any major decisions would emerge from collective deliberation rather than unilateral action.
“I have heard your voices. I respect your opinions. But let us reason together,” he said, striking the perfect balance between leadership and consultation.
Perhaps most impressive was Raila’s nuanced defense of Edwin Sifuna against mounting pressure from some quarters, with the party leader emphasizing that internal discussions would be handled through proper party structures rather than public exchanges.
This approach underscores his commitment to institutional governance and orderly political processes.
The Kakamega conference ultimately showcased Raila Odinga at his finest – a statesman capable of managing complex political relationships while maintaining his party’s democratic values and Kenya’s broader political stability.
In the annals of Kenyan political history, few interventions have been as consequential yet as quietly orchestrated as the one that unfolded in the aftermath of the devastating Gen Z protests of June 2024.
As Parliament buildings burned and military deployment loomed ominously over the nation, it was an unlikely phone call from across the Atlantic that would ultimately save President William Ruto’s administration from collapse.
The revelation, made public by ODM leader Raila Odinga during a candid interview at his Karen home on Sunday, pulls back the curtain on one of the most critical moments in Kenya’s recent political trajectory—a moment when the country teetered on the precipice of military intervention.
Brink of military takeover
By June 25, 2024, Kenya had reached a dangerous inflection point.
The Gen Z-led protests against the controversial Finance Bill had escalated beyond anyone’s expectations.
Parliament had been stormed, and in response, President Ruto had deployed military forces a move that historically signals the beginning of the end for civilian governments across Africa.
“There was a danger that ultimately, the military would come and take over,” Raila disclosed, his words carrying the weight of someone who understood how quickly democratic institutions can crumble.
“We were almost at the brink of that happening, and there were speculations on what was going to happen next. We had seen what had happened in other countries in a similar situation.”
The parallels were unmistakable.
Across the continent, similar scenarios had played out with predictable outcomes: civilian governments falling, military juntas taking control, and democratic progress being set back by decades.
Kenya, despite its relatively stable democratic trajectory since 2010, was not immune to such possibilities.
Transatlantic intervention
It was at this critical juncture that former President Uhuru Kenyatta, monitoring events from the United States, made what may go down as one of the most important phone calls in Kenya’s political history.
Despite the well-documented animosity between himself and his former deputy, and the equally strained relationship between Raila and Ruto, Kenyatta recognized that the moment demanded statesmanship above personal grievances.
“In that charged environment, one of my colleagues, former President Uhuru Kenyatta, called me,” Raila recounted.
“He was in the US and suggested that although he knows I don’t want to talk to Ruto, in the interest of the country, I need to find a way of talking to him.”
The significance of this intervention cannot be overstated.
Kenyatta, who had spent his final years in office in an increasingly bitter political divorce from Ruto, was essentially asking his political ally Raila to save the administration of the man who had publicly humiliated him and dismantled his political legacy.
Unlikely Rescue Mission
What followed was a political choreography that few could have predicted.
Rather than Raila having to seek out the embattled president, it was Ruto who reached out first—a telling indication of just how precarious his position had become.
“I did not even have to look for Ruto; he asked to come and see me and we agreed that we should talk,” Raila revealed, highlighting the role reversal that the crisis had precipitated.
The discussions that followed were brutally honest.
Raila confronted Ruto with the fundamental cause of the crisis: his administration’s failure to implement the recommendations of the National Dialogue Committee (NADCO) that had been established to address previous political tensions.
“When we had discussions, I told him that these issues had come because he did not implement the NADCO report, and under these circumstances, we must have a broader conversation to bring people together,” Raila explained.
Initially reluctant, Ruto eventually acquiesced to the broader engagement that would ultimately evolve into the broad-based government we see today.
Price of salvation
The rescue of Ruto’s administration came at a significant political cost—primarily to Raila himself.
The ODM leader faced fierce resistance from within his own Azimio coalition, many of whom viewed any collaboration with the Kenya Kwanza government as a betrayal of their opposition mandate.
“We tried to consult among ourselves as Azimio if we could find a way of participating in a broad-based government. I myself was against it, and my other colleagues also,” Raila admitted with characteristic candor.
However, pragmatism ultimately prevailed over political purity.
The ODM party leadership concluded that sending technocrats to help stabilize the government was preferable to allowing the country to descend into chaos or military rule.
The result was the appointment of ODM-affiliated Cabinet Secretaries Hassan Joho, Wycliffe Oparanya, Opiyo Wandayi, John Mbadi, and Beatrice Askul—individuals Raila described as “experts” who could “help steady the ship and come up with new ideas to deal with issues in contention.”
Perhaps most significantly, Raila has been careful to characterize this political collaboration as temporary and issue-based rather than a permanent realignment.
The March 2025 Memorandum of Understanding between ODM and UDA focuses on specific deliverables: full implementation of the NADCO report, addressing youth unemployment, and implementing the two-thirds gender rule.
“We have said that we are in the broad-based government until 2027. We did not say that we are going to work with UDA beyond 2027,” Raila emphasized, drawing a clear line between crisis management and long-term political partnership.
The events of June 2024 and their aftermath represent a pivotal moment in Kenya’s democratic evolution.
They demonstrate both the fragility and resilience of the country’s political institutions.
While the Gen Z protests exposed deep-seated grievances and the potential for democratic breakdown, the response by the political leadership orchestrated by Uhuru from afar showed that maturity and statesmanship can still triumph over personal ambition.
For Ruto, the intervention represents both salvation and humiliation.
His administration was saved, but only through the magnanimity of the two men he had spent years politically marginalizing.
For Raila, it represents perhaps his most significant act of statesmanship choosing country over party politics at considerable personal political cost.
For Uhuru, operating from the sidelines in the United States, it was a masterclass in behind-the-scenes political influence, demonstrating that his political relevance extends far beyond his physical presence in the country.
## Looking Ahead
As Kenya approaches the 2027 general elections, the broad-based government experiment continues to evolve. While it has undoubtedly provided the stability that Ruto’s administration desperately needed after the Gen Z protests, questions remain about its long-term sustainability and electoral implications.
The arrangement has given Ruto breathing room to address the fundamental governance issues that sparked the protests in the first place. However, it has also complicated the political landscape for 2027, creating new dynamics and alliances that will shape the next electoral cycle.
What remains clear is that the events of June 2024 represented a crossroads for Kenyan democracy—and the choice made by the key political actors, orchestrated by an unexpected phone call from across the Atlantic, may have prevented the country from sliding into the kind of political chaos that has plagued other parts of the continent.
In saving Ruto’s administration, Uhuru and Raila may well have saved Kenya’s democratic trajectory itself.
Former Chief Justice dismisses Raila’s conclave proposal as government-initiated scheme that won’t address root causes
Former Chief Justice David Maraga has drawn a clear line in the sand regarding national dialogue, endorsing grassroots conversations while categorically rejecting Raila Odinga’s proposed Inter-Generational National Conclave as a government ploy that will only create positions for “selfish leaders.”
Speaking on Tuesday, the 2027 presidential aspirant positioned himself as a champion of authentic, people-driven dialogue while dismissing the former Prime Minister’s initiative as fundamentally flawed in its approach and intent.
“If there’s going to be any dialogue, it should be people-driven,” Maraga declared, emphasizing that such conversations must emerge from genuine public demand rather than government orchestration.
“People are expressing concerns and saying we should have dialogue. What can only help is a people-driven dialogue that will involve the youths who have suffered most.”
The former Chief Justice’s remarks represent a significant departure from Raila’s vision of an inclusive national conclave designed to address Gen Z concerns and broader national issues.
While both leaders acknowledge the need for dialogue, their proposed mechanisms couldn’t be more different.
Opposition Leader Raila Odinga.
Maraga’s critique of Raila’s conclave was particularly sharp, describing it as a “government-initiated approach that will not help solve anything.” He argued that such forums historically serve to “get positions for people and will not address the root cause of the problems.”
“So, to say that you are going to discuss the affairs of the youth by the government now setting the agenda, that’s a joke,” Maraga stated, his words carrying the weight of someone who has witnessed previous dialogue initiatives fail to deliver meaningful change.
The former Chief Justice’s skepticism is rooted in historical precedent. He pointed to the Kofi Annan-led mediation of 2008 following post-election violence, noting that despite producing various recommendations, “only very few were complied with.” This historical context informs his belief that top-down dialogue initiatives are inherently limited in their effectiveness.
Instead, Maraga is positioning himself as a facilitator of authentic grassroots dialogue. He revealed that various groups have already approached him about participating in such conversations, and he’s committed to engaging “not as a presidential candidate but as a leader and former Chief Justice.”
“There are groups already thinking about that, I have myself requested and talked to some people we come together and think about what we should do in my capacity as a leader and former Chief Justice,” he explained, framing his involvement as a patriotic duty rather than political positioning.
This strategic positioning comes at a crucial moment in Kenya’s political landscape. The country has been rocked by youth-led protests, and both established and emerging leaders are scrambling to position themselves as authentic voices for change. Maraga’s rejection of Raila’s approach while proposing his own alternative represents a calculated move to differentiate himself from the political establishment.
The former Chief Justice’s emphasis on youth involvement is particularly significant given the generational tensions that have defined recent political discourse. He insisted that any meaningful dialogue “must also involve young people who are the most affected by recent developments in the country.”
Raila’s proposed conclave, announced following the chaos of Saba Saba Day, was designed to be comprehensive, addressing transparency, accountability, corruption, youth unemployment, and police reforms. The former Prime Minister envisioned a forum with “clear terms of reference” populated by “serious and sober minds of the nation,” with outcomes potentially subject to a referendum.
However, Maraga’s criticism suggests that the former Prime Minister’s approach, despite its comprehensive scope, suffers from a fundamental flaw: its association with government machinery. In the current political climate, where trust in institutions is at historic lows, this association may indeed be problematic.
The former Chief Justice described his proposed dialogue as a “stopgap measure,” suggesting a more immediate, responsive approach to addressing national concerns. This framing positions his initiative as more agile and responsive than Raila’s more structured conclave approach.
The tension between these two approaches reflects broader questions about political legitimacy and authentic representation in contemporary Kenya. While Raila’s conclave offers institutional weight and comprehensive scope, Maraga’s people-driven dialogue promises authenticity and grassroots legitimacy.
As Kenya navigates this period of political uncertainty, the competition between different models of national dialogue reveals competing visions for how the country should address its challenges. Maraga’s rejection of Raila’s approach while championing his own alternative suggests that the conversation about Kenya’s future will be as much about process as it is about outcomes.
The former Chief Justice’s positioning also highlights the complex dynamics within Kenya’s political landscape, where traditional alliances are being tested and new forms of political engagement are emerging. His criticism of Raila’s conclave as government-initiated reflects broader skepticism about the efficacy of formal political processes in addressing genuine grievances.
Whether Maraga’s people-driven approach will prove more effective than Raila’s structured conclave remains to be seen. What is clear is that both leaders recognize the urgent need for national dialogue, even as they disagree fundamentally on how such conversations should be structured and who should lead them.
Political activist and INJECT Party leader Morara Kebaso has received an unexpected endorsement from Ugenya MP Samuel Atandi, who believes the young leader has significant potential in Kenya’s political arena.
In a statement released Monday, Atandi praised Morara as “a realistic and honest young man” whose character traits position him well for success in the country’s complex political landscape. The MP’s endorsement comes amid ongoing debates about the role of youth in Kenya’s political transformation.
Atandi found common ground with Morara’s recent assertions about the nature of Kenyan politics, particularly his view that the political system remains fundamentally ethnic-based. The MP also agreed with Morara’s controversial stance that the much-discussed “Gen Z revolution” is largely non-existent.
“Mr Morara Kebaso is a realistic and honest young man who has a future in Kenya’s politics,” Atandi stated on social media platform X. “Your views on the ‘ethnic’ Kenya are factual, and the so-called Gen Z revolution does not exist.”
However, Atandi identified what he sees as a crucial gap in Morara’s political development: the need for seasoned mentorship. The MP specifically recommended that Morara seek guidance from former Prime Minister Raila Odinga, suggesting this relationship could accelerate his political growth.
“I would like to have him quickly visit Baba, Raila Odinga, for some tutorial/mentorship program,” Atandi advised.
Morara’s political journey has been marked by bold statements and strategic pivots. After founding his INJECT Party, he initially collaborated with opposition parties but later distanced himself, accusing them of prioritizing personal interests over national welfare. His criticism has been particularly sharp regarding what he perceives as the opposition’s singular focus on removing President William Ruto from office without articulating a comprehensive vision for Kenya’s future.
The young politician has consistently urged Kenyan youth to reject what he terms “tribal alliances” and instead focus on substantive issues affecting the country. His message emphasizes the need for concrete solutions to corruption, unemployment, and justice system failures.
“We must think beyond removing the President. What is our vision? What is our stand on corruption? How will we turn around our economy and give jobs and opportunities to young people?” Morara challenged during a recent public address.
This endorsement from Atandi represents a significant moment for Morara, who has experienced the volatility of political life, at one point hinting at leaving politics entirely before recommitting to what he describes as an unavoidable duty.
As Kenya’s political landscape continues to evolve, the relationship between established politicians like Atandi and emerging leaders like Morara may prove crucial in shaping the country’s democratic future. Whether Morara will heed the advice to seek Raila’s mentorship remains to be seen, but the conversation highlights the ongoing tension between generational change and political continuity in Kenya.
The endorsement also underscores the complex dynamics within Kenya’s political opposition, where unity efforts continue to grapple with questions of leadership, vision, and strategy in the face of mounting national challenges.
Former Prime Minister proposes massive national dialogue forum as Kenya grapples with youth protests and constitutional reform demands
BOMET – Opposition leader Raila Odinga has unveiled an ambitious plan for a 1,880-member national dialogue forum set to commence in August, positioning it as Kenya’s pathway out of mounting political and social tensions that have gripped the nation in recent weeks.
Speaking at a funeral service in Kapkimolwo, Bomet East constituency, the ODM party leader outlined his vision for what he termed an “intergenerational conclave” that would bring together voices from across Kenya’s diverse demographic and geographic landscape.
Under Odinga’s proposal, each of Kenya’s 47 counties would nominate 40 representatives, creating a massive 1,880-member assembly.
The composition would be deliberately inclusive: 20 young people from each county, with the remaining 20 slots reserved for elders, women, people with disabilities, farmers, business owners, and civil society members.
“This should not just be intergenerational—it must be representative of Kenya’s full diversity,” Odinga emphasized, building on his earlier announcement during the Saba Saba commemorations.
The scale of the proposed forum is unprecedented in Kenya’s recent political history, dwarfing previous national dialogue initiatives and reflecting the gravity with which Odinga views the current crisis.
Central to Odinga’s vision is a comprehensive review of the 2010 Constitution.
The veteran politician, who has championed constitutional change throughout his career, argues that 15 years of devolution have exposed critical gaps that need addressing.
“We should review the Constitution and address the gaps that have come to the fore in the era of devolution in the country,” he stated, suggesting that structural changes rather than personnel changes hold the key to Kenya’s challenges.
The proposed conclave would tackle what Odinga described as “irreducible reforms” covering police brutality, judicial inefficiency, corruption, and youth unemployment—issues that have driven thousands of young Kenyans to the streets in recent protests.
Odinga’s proposal comes against the backdrop of sustained youth-led demonstrations that have rocked Kenya since late June.
Unlike many political leaders who have dismissed the protests, Odinga has validated the young people’s concerns.
“We must listen to these young people. They are not protesting for nothing. These are our children. Their frustrations are legitimate and must not be ignored,” he said, positioning himself as an advocate for youth grievances.
The decision to reserve 50 percent of the conclave’s slots for young people represents a significant departure from traditional political forums, which typically marginalize youth voices despite their numerical strength in Kenya’s population.
Beyond ‘Ruto Must Go’
In a calculated political move, Odinga distanced himself from calls for President William Ruto’s ouster, arguing that the country’s problems run deeper than individual leadership failures.
“Ruto must go is not a solution. Even if you put Gachagua there, nothing will change unless we address the root causes,” he told mourners, referring to former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.
This position allows Odinga to present himself as a statesman focused on systemic solutions rather than opportunistic political gain, potentially appealing to Kenyans exhausted by partisan politics.
The former Prime Minister used the platform to launch a scathing attack on what he termed efforts to entrench tribalism, specifically targeting Gachagua’s recent political messaging.
“Kenya belongs to all of us, and no community, tribe, or group of people has more right than others to live and work in this country or take charge of leadership,” Odinga declared, reinforcing his pan-Kenyan credentials.
His statement—“Kenya is for every Kenyan—Luo, Kikuyu, Somali, Kalenjin, Mijikenda, Maasai. No one owns this country”—was clearly designed to counter ethnic mobilization tactics that have characterized recent political discourse.
Perhaps most significantly, Odinga has proposed that the conclave’s resolutions should be subjected to a public referendum, giving Kenyans the final say on proposed reforms.
This approach echoes the 2010 constitutional referendum process and could provide legitimacy to any outcomes.
The referendum route also positions Odinga as a democrat committed to popular participation, contrasting with top-down political processes that have characterized much of Kenya’s recent governance.
Odinga used the occasion to strongly criticize President Ruto’s shoot-to-kill and shoot-to-immobilize orders against protesters, calling them “illegal and uncalled for.”
“Police should simply arrest and prosecute those who have taken advantage of the demonstrations to commit criminal activities. Shooting them should not arise,” he stated, positioning himself as a defender of constitutional rights.
The success of Odinga’s proposed conclave will depend on several factors: buy-in from county governments, participation from diverse groups, and ultimately, government cooperation.
The August timeline is ambitious, requiring rapid mobilization and organization across all 47 counties.
The proposal also raises questions about funding, logistics, and the ultimate authority of the conclave’s decisions.
Without government backing, the forum risks becoming another opposition-led initiative with limited implementation power.
For Odinga, the conclave represents both opportunity and risk.
Success could cement his position as a national leader capable of bringing Kenyans together beyond partisan divides.
Failure, however, could expose the limitations of his influence and the hollowness of dialogue-based solutions.
The timing is politically astute, coming as youth protests maintain momentum and government responses appear increasingly heavy-handed.
By offering a structured alternative to street demonstrations, Odinga positions himself as both revolutionary and statesman.
As Kenya approaches the 2027 elections, the success or failure of this intergenerational conclave could significantly influence the political landscape.
For now, it represents the opposition’s most concrete proposal for addressing the nation’s deepening crisis through peaceful, inclusive dialogue.
BOMET, Kenya – Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) leader Raila Odinga delivered a passionate defense of Generation Z protesters on Saturday, condemning government officials who have dismissed young demonstrators as irrational while calling for immediate national dialogue to address their grievances.
Speaking at a public forum in Bomet County, the veteran politician directly challenged the narrative that has painted youth protesters as disruptive forces, instead framing them as concerned citizens with legitimate complaints about governance failures.
“Na vijana wale wanaandamana, wale wanaitwa Gen Z, sio wendawazimu. Ni watoto wetu,” Odinga declared in Kiswahili, emphasizing that the young protesters “are not crazy” but “are our children.”
The remarks come as Kenya grapples with sustained youth-led demonstrations that have rocked the country in recent weeks.
The protests have been marked by tragic casualties, with the Kenya National Commission on Human Rights confirming that 38 people died and at least 130 were injured during the July 7 Saba Saba demonstrations alone.
Rather than dismissing the protests, Odinga proposed a comprehensive approach to address youth concerns through structured national dialogue.
His proposal centers on creating an inclusive national convention that would bring together diverse voices from across Kenya’s 47 counties.
“Tuzungumze na wao kwa sababu mimi nimependekeza… kila kaunti ilete vijana ishirini,” he said, suggesting that each county should contribute 20 youth representatives to the dialogue process.
The ODM leader’s vision extends beyond youth participation alone.
He outlined a balanced representation model where 50 percent of delegates would be young people, while the remaining half would include elders, people living with disabilities, civil society organizations, women’s groups, and religious leaders.
“Let this be 50 per cent youth and 50 per cent other citizens, elders, people living with disabilities, civil society, women so that we can have a full national conversation,” Odinga explained.
The youth-led demonstrations have evolved from specific incidents to broader expressions of frustration with governance issues, inequality, and police brutality.
Key protest events include the June 17 demonstration following the killing of Albert Ojwang in Homa Bay, the June 25 march honoring protesters who died, and the recent Saba Saba protests on July 7.
These demonstrations have highlighted deep-seated grievances among Kenya’s youth, who comprise a significant portion of the population but often feel marginalized from political and economic opportunities.
Odinga’s intervention carries particular weight given his role as a key opposition figure and his influence in Kenyan politics.
He warned that ignoring youth frustrations could have serious implications for the country’s political stability ahead of the 2027 general elections.
“Tusiende uchaguzi wa 2027 na hasira mingi,” he cautioned, urging leaders not to let anger fester until the next electoral cycle.
This warning reflects broader concerns about how unresolved grievances could manifest in future political contests, potentially destabilizing Kenya’s democratic processes.
Odinga’s stance positions him as a voice of reason in a charged political environment, potentially strengthening his influence among younger voters who have felt disconnected from traditional political leadership.
His call for inclusive dialogue also challenges the current government’s approach to handling dissent.
The ODM leader’s proposal for a national convention represents a significant political gambit that could either provide a pathway for addressing youth concerns or become another point of political contention if not implemented effectively.
As Kenya continues to grapple with these protests and their aftermath, Odinga’s intervention adds a new dimension to the national conversation about youth participation in governance and the need for responsive political leadership.
Standing Against “Shoot to Kill” Orders
In a separate address at a burial function in Bomet County the same day, Odinga took a firm stance against recent government directives that appear to endorse the shooting of protesters.
His comments directly challenged orders issued by President William Ruto and Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen.
“Right now, there is darkness in Kenya because we are angry. There is also a lot of hatred in our nation. People are fighting and getting killed. When you see someone say shoot but don’t kill, it’s because of anger, but anger always leads to loss,” Odinga stated, advocating for arrests and court proceedings instead of violence.
The ODM leader’s position has found support from other political figures, including Kakamega Senator Boni Khalwale, who on Friday urged the government to rescind directives that threaten the lives of Kenya’s youth.
Kakamega Senator Boni Khalwale.
“We don’t kill people. That is why I would like to respectfully disagree with CS Murkomen. I also disagree with the President. These children — if a child has eaten to satisfaction, they cannot go stealing from your home. The government must listen to our youth,” Khalwale said during a public event in Butere constituency.
Khalwale raised practical concerns about the shoot-to-kill orders, questioning scenarios where young people might legitimately approach police stations to report crimes or seek opportunities during recruitment drives.
“What if a young person goes to the police station to file a report that their motorbike has been stolen — and then you say shoot to kill? Where will they take that report?” he posed.
While defending protesters’ rights, Odinga also challenged demonstrators to ensure their actions serve specific purposes.
Drawing from his experience in the 1990 pro-multiparty demonstrations, he emphasized that protests should be strategic rather than perpetual.
“But we said everything has its time and season. So we had a time when people came out to go to the streets for protests. But these demonstrations are not an end to themselves and should not be undertaken every day. They should be a means to an end and must have what it aims to achieve,” he explained.
This nuanced position reflects Odinga’s attempt to balance support for youth grievances with calls for strategic political action, potentially positioning himself as a bridge between frustrated young protesters and established political institutions.
The contrasting approaches to handling protests have created a clear political divide, with government officials taking increasingly hardline positions while opposition figures advocate for dialogue and restraint.
This division adds another layer of complexity to Kenya’s already charged political environment.
The coming weeks will test whether Odinga’s calls for dialogue and restraint gain traction or whether the cycle of protests and increasingly aggressive government responses continues unchanged.
NAIROBI, Kenya Jul 6 – Opposition leader Raila Odinga has spoken out for the first time on the Gen Z-led protests that have rocked the country over the past few weeks, voicing his support for the youth’s push for good governance and justice while emphasizing the need for dialogue to steer the country out of its current crisis.
Speaking during a church service , Odinga praised the courage and resilience of young Kenyans who have taken to the streets to challenge government excesses, saying their message cannot be ignored.
However, he ruled out joining them in the protests physically, stating that while he may not be in the streets, he remains firmly behind them in principle.
“They told me, ‘Baba sit at home, you have done enough.’ I am at home, but I am behind youEat teargas even us ate. Continue to eat teargas and tell them to add more. Tell them you will not surrender,”he said during a church service.
The former Prime Minister, who has been a central figure in opposition for decades, said the protests reflect long-standing frustrations with poor governance, corruption, and exclusion issues that he said require more than cosmetic fixes.
“What is required in this country is serious dialogue, a comprehensive dialogue, that will be able to fix all the things that have gone wrong,” he said.
“We must deal with the issues of unemployment among our youth, the scourge of corruption, ethnicity and tribalism, nepotism, and exclusion. These are the issues that must be tackled if we are to get this country back on track.”
Odinga’s remarks come as the Saba Saba protests are expected tomorrow. The Saba Saba protests, which take place annually on July 7, commemorate the historic push for multiparty democracy in Kenya.
Odinga, while endorsing the protesters’ demands, issued a stern warning against the use of state violence on peaceful demonstrators.
“Police should not use brutality against unarmed innocent people who are demonstrating their rights,” he said.
The opposition leader also used the platform to challenge the complicity of religious leaders, criticizing the Church for what he termed as silence and submission in the face of national injustice.
“Today, the religious leaders are summoned like servants to go to State House with prepared speeches.The Church must speak the word of God and stand firm with the children of God. The Church should not be subservient to temporal power,”he lamented.
“When children of this country come out in large numbers to say something is wrong, the Church deserves to stand with these children to speak truth to power,” Odinga added.
He further turned his attention to the public sector, challenging the government’s rhetoric on fighting corruption, which he described as selective and hollow.
According to Odinga, the government must first address endemic corruption within the civil service particularly the growing trend of senior officials doubling as business people.
“If you’re talking about fighting corruption, first address the issue of corruption within the civil service.Civil servants should not become businessmen. They should either choose to be businessmen or remain as civil servants not both,”Odinga said.
Opposition leader issues ultimatum from Bangkok as autopsy reveals crucial details in teacher’s custodial death
Bangkok, Thailand – June 10, 2025 – Raila Odinga, Kenya’s veteran opposition leader, has issued a powerful statement from Bangkok condemning the death of Albert Ojwang, a 31-year-old teacher and social media influencer who died in police custody at Nairobi’s Central Police Station on June 7, 2025, just one hour after being booked.
In a statement released by his secretariat, Odinga expressed deep horror over reports that Ojwang was arrested from his home in Homa Bay on Friday, June 6, transported 400 kilometers to Nairobi, and held in police cells over an alleged offensive social media post about a senior police officer.
According to police records, Ojwang was booked at Central Police Station at 2:35 a.m. as the 59th suspect under charges of false publication.
Odinga highlighted the troubling lack of clarity surrounding the orders for Ojwang’s arrest and transfer across the country.
“So far, nobody knows who gave the orders for Mr. Ojwang to be arrested and ferried all the way to Nairobi and yet that person should be answering to Kenyans,” he stated in his strongly-worded statement.
The former Prime Minister described Ojwang’s death as part of a disturbing pattern of young, defenseless Kenyans losing their lives to police brutality.
He warned that such incidents erode the authority and credibility of the police and the state, pushing the nation toward chaos and collapse.
“When citizens can no longer tell the difference between the two forms of injustice—police injustice and mob injustice—we are staring at the reality failure as a nation,” Odinga remarked, underscoring the gravity of the situation.
As Odinga issued his statement, a postmortem examination of Ojwang’s body was underway at the Nairobi Funeral Home (City Mortuary) on Tuesday, June 10.
The autopsy, initially scheduled for Monday, was delayed after government pathologist Dr. Johansen Oduor stepped aside citing a conflict of interest due to his blood relation to the deceased, though he later confirmed he remains part of the examination team.
The delay was also caused by an incident on Monday when activists and family members stormed the mortuary’s body-holding area, allegedly “disturbing” Ojwang’s body as pathologists and police prepared for the autopsy.
Additional security personnel were deployed to the mortuary ahead of Tuesday’s examination to ensure the procedure could proceed smoothly.
Family lawyer Julius Juma emphasized the need for transparency, stating: “We want transparency. There must be no foul play.”
The autopsy is being conducted with independent pathologists and civil rights organizations present to ensure impartiality.
The death has prompted swift action from Kenya’s police leadership. Inspector General Douglas Kanja has ordered the interdiction of several officers at Nairobi’s Central Police Station following Ojwang’s death.
The move comes amid mounting pressure from politicians, human rights organizations, and the public for accountability.
According to police reports, Ojwang was found unconscious in his cell after being transferred from the DCI headquarters along Kiambu Road where he had been interrogated. Police claim he sustained fatal injuries, though the exact circumstances remain under investigation.
Amnesty International Kenya has called the death “tragic” and emphasized that “no Kenyan should lose their life in police custody.”
The organization stressed that police officers have both legal and moral duties to ensure the safety and well-being of those in their custody.
Political Pressure Mounts
Opposition lawmakers, led by Suba North MP Millie Odhiambo, have dismissed police claims about the circumstances of Ojwang’s death.
They are demanding the immediate arrest of officers involved in the case and calling for a thorough investigation.
Homa Bay Town MP Peter Kaluma has made explosive claims, alleging that “the person behind Albert Ojwang’s death is the same individual who ordered his arrest and transfer to Nairobi.”
In a post on his X account, Kaluma called for the arrest and prosecution of the unnamed individual to ensure justice for Ojwang and his family.
Homa Bay Governor Gladys Wanga has also joined calls for a swift and comprehensive probe into the incident, which has shocked residents of the lakeside county where Ojwang was well-known as both an educator and social media personality.
Pattern of Police Brutality
Odinga’s statement comes against the backdrop of growing concern over custodial deaths in Kenya.
The veteran politician called for urgent action, demanding “a speedy and credible investigation into Ojwang’s death, alongside other unresolved cases of police injustice since 2023.”
He emphasized that the National Police Service must demonstrate genuine commitment to holding its members accountable, starting with this latest incident that has captured national attention.
The Victim
Albert Ojwang.
Albert Ojwang was described as a dedicated teacher from Voi and an active social media influencer who had built a following through his posts on various platforms.
His family spokesperson revealed that police had promised his father that he would be safe following his arrest—a promise that was tragically broken just days later.
The 31-year-old’s death has resonated particularly strongly in his home region of Homa Bay and among Kenya’s online community, where many young people have expressed fears about the safety of expressing opinions on social media.
Raila’s Tough Demands to Ruto Administration
Odinga’s statement from Bangkok carries particular weight as it directly challenges President William Ruto’s administration to take decisive action.
The veteran politician’s demands come at a time when the government faces mounting criticism over police conduct and human rights violations.
In his official statement, Odinga warned that such incidents push the nation toward chaos and collapse, stating: “When citizens can no longer tell the difference between the two forms of injustice—police injustice and mob injustice—we are staring at the reality failure as a nation.”
The opposition leader’s intervention from Bangkok, where he is currently based following his unsuccessful bid for the African Union Commission chairpersonship, signals his continued involvement in Kenyan politics and his role as a key critic of the current administration’s handling of security matters.
IPOA Investigation and Transparency Measures
Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) Chairperson Ahmed Hassan has pledged to carry out a thorough and impartial investigation into the matter, responding to intensified calls from Ojwang’s family and human rights organizations for accountability.
The involvement of multiple oversight bodies and the presence of independent pathologists during the autopsy reflects the high-stakes nature of the case and the demand for transparency from various stakeholders.
The case has highlighted questions about the extent to which Kenyan authorities should go in pursuing social media-related offenses, particularly when they involve transporting suspects across vast distances from their home regions to the capital for what amounts to alleged online commentary.
As investigations continue, the death of Albert Ojwang has become a rallying point for those calling for comprehensive police reforms and greater accountability in Kenya’s criminal justice system.
The outcome of the investigations and any subsequent prosecutions will be closely watched as a test of the government’s commitment to addressing police brutality and protecting citizens’ rights.
The family awaits justice while the nation grapples with yet another custodial death that has exposed deep-seated problems within Kenya’s law enforcement agencies.
ODM leader strikes conciliatory tone while demanding justice for families affected by 2023-2024 demonstrations
HOMA BAY – Opposition leader Raila Odinga delivered a measured yet firm message to President William Ruto during Madaraka Day celebrations, calling for compensation to victims of anti-government protests while warning against the revival of colonial-era provincial administration.
Speaking at the packed Raila Odinga Stadium in Homa Bay County, the ODM leader struck a conciliatory tone but insisted that national healing requires acknowledgment of past grievances and concrete action to address them.
Odinga renewed his call for the government to compensate families affected by the violence that marked the 2023 and 2024 anti-government demonstrations, emphasizing that apologies alone are insufficient for national reconciliation.
“I want to say today that we should do compensation to families of those who died and those who were injured. We want Kenyans to live in peace and unity,” Odinga told the crowd, referring to both his party-led protests in 2023 and the youth-driven Gen Z demonstrations of 2024.
The protests, sparked by public dissatisfaction over rising living costs, increased taxation, and demands for electoral justice, were met with heavy-handed police responses.
According to Amnesty International Kenya, at least 65 people were killed, 89 forcibly disappeared, and thousands arrested during the 2024 protests alone.
Odinga defended the protesters as legitimate citizens seeking reform rather than criminals. “We have had several challenges in the country.
Two years ago, we were on the streets, and a year ago, the Gen Zs were also on the streets,” he said.
While acknowledging President Ruto’s recent apology to the youth during the National Prayer Breakfast on May 28, Odinga insisted that words must be followed by action.
“I saw that during the prayer breakfast recently, there were apologies being made, by the Speaker and yourself [President Ruto], which is wonderful as a first step to reconciliation. But there is the issue of people who are injured, the people who died during that time.”
Opposition to Provincial Administration Revival
In a separate but equally significant message, Odinga urged President Ruto not to resurrect the provincial administration system, calling it a colonial relic incompatible with modern Kenya’s devolved governance structure.
“Provincial administration is a relic of colonialism. It has no place today in a free and independent country. Let county governments receive sufficient resources and be allowed to deliver services to the people,” the former Prime Minister declared.
Instead of centralizing power, Odinga called for strengthening devolution by ensuring adequate funding for county governments.
He specifically urged Parliament to honor a previous agreement to allocate Sh450 billion to counties in the upcoming national budget.
“We want to see devolution working. Counties need to be properly funded so that they can provide essential services. There are also some national functions that can be delegated to counties to make governance more effective,” he said.
The ODM leader emphasized that while Members of Parliament should continue their oversight, legislative, and representative roles, development work should remain with county governments.
Throughout his address, Odinga emphasized the need for national unity and inclusion, urging Kenyans to reject divisions based on tribe, gender, religion, or culture.
“This is what our founding fathers envisioned—one nation united in diversity,” he said, echoing the spirit of Madaraka Day, which commemorates Kenya’s attainment of internal self-rule from British colonial rule in 1963.
The Madaraka Day address comes amid a period of political reconciliation between Odinga and President Ruto, who signed a memorandum of understanding in March 2025 to form a “broad-based government” aimed at national unity.
President Ruto, who was present at the ceremony, has adopted a more conciliatory approach in recent months, including his public apology to the youth.
However, Odinga’s message made clear that sustainable peace requires addressing the grievances of those affected by past violence.
As Kenya marks another year of independence, Odinga’s dual message of reconciliation and accountability reflects the delicate balance the country must strike between moving forward and ensuring justice for past wrongs.
His opposition to reviving provincial administration also underscores ongoing debates about the future of Kenya’s governance structure and the role of devolution in national development.
The veteran politician’s measured approach suggests a willingness to work with the current administration while maintaining pressure for systemic reforms and justice for victims of state violence.
The Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has accused The Standard Newspaper of orchestrating a smear campaign against its leader, Rt. Hon. Raila Odinga, and his family.
In a statement issued by ODM Executive Director Oduor Ong’wen on Monday, the party condemned the newspaper for a story published in its latest edition titled ‘Our Turn to Eat,’ which alleged that several of Odinga’s relatives secured senior government positions following a March political agreement with President Ruto.
Ong’wen described the report as an attempt to “negate, demean, and destroy” Odinga’s legacy of sacrifice, nationalism, and patriotism, which he said came at great personal risk to Odinga and his family.
The article featured a photo of Odinga alongside his brother Oburu, daughter Winnie, and other relatives, questioning whether Odinga’s actions reflect statesmanship or “strategic self-interest activism.”
It accused Odinga of using national crises to advance personal and familial interests, despite his public image as a champion of the people.
Speaking from ODM’s offices at Chungwa House in Nairobi, Ong’wen assured party supporters that a comprehensive statement detailing the party’s relationship with the Standard Group Limited will be issued on Tuesday, May 6.
The statement is expected to provide guidance on how ODM will address the media house moving forward.
The Standard Group has faced scrutiny from political circles for its hard-hitting exposés on Kenya’s political system.
Recently, the media house has been embroiled in a legal battle with the Communications Authority of Kenya (CA) over a Ksh43 million debt.
The CA had threatened to revoke Standard Group’s broadcasting licenses, a move the company called a politically motivated attempt to silence its critical reporting on the Kenya Kwanza government.
On April 15, the High Court issued a temporary order halting the CA’s actions until the matter is heard on May 2, 2025.
ODM’s accusations mark a new escalation in tensions between political leaders and media houses in Kenya, raising questions about press freedom and political accountability as the country navigates a complex political landscape.
Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna has said that President William Ruto stands to lose 2027 elections, even with Raila Odinga’s support, citing incompetence and loss of public support.
Sifuna said Ruto has failed to manage the country’s internal and international affairs, making the grounds for re-election severely slim.
Appearing on Citizen TV Thursday morning, Sifuna argued Ruto’s administration has destroyed lives, weakened the economy, and allowed the killing of people.
Sifuna, who douples up as Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) Secretarty General, said the party will not support Ruto’s administration, as suggested by some party members.
He criticized a section of ODM MPs who pledged support for Ruto following the African Union Commission (AUC) election.
“As ODM, I’m telling you, and I’ve said it on this show, my position is that even if ODM supports Ruto, Ruto will still lose. I have said it here, and I repeat it. So, I want to make it very clear that, as a party, we do not support either the internal affairs or the external affairs of this country as they are being run,” Sifuna said.
The Secretary General emphasized that ODM is a party of order and hierarchy, and the decision on whom to support lies with its leader, Raila Odinga.
Sifuna urged ODM members to remain steadfast and wait for Raila’s directive upon his return.
He dismissed speculations that Ruto’s support for Raila during the AUC chairmanship race would influence ODM’s political direction.
“Are you telling me that if William Ruto had driven off and left Raila behind, there would have been no vehicle to take him to the venue? Let’s be serious as a party,” Sifuna said while commenting on Ruto’s move to share a ride on his official car with Raila.
This statement comes as the ODM party navigates a turbulent political storm, with internal divisions deepening over whether to support President Ruto’s government.
The debate arose after President Ruto showed immense support for ODM’s party leader during the AUC campaigning period and the election itself.
However, Raila lost the AUC seat to Djibouti’s Foreign Minister Mahmoud Ali Youssouf in a fiercely contested race. Youssouf secured the two-thirds threshold with 33 votes in the seventh round of voting.
Youssouf’s victory marks Kenya’s second unsuccessful attempt to secure the AUC chairmanship, following a similar defeat in 2017 when Moussa Faki of Chad defeated Kenya’s candidate, Amina Mohamed.
Raila conceded defeat in the race, expressing gratitude to his supporters and emphasizing the importance of respecting democratic processes in Africa.
“I had offered myself as a candidate. Over the last few months, I have traveled across the continent, engaging with different leaders and canvassing for their votes. Today, they have expressed their will,” Odinga said.
“As it is, we did not succeed. We must strengthen democracy on the African continent, and I am therefore conceding defeat. I want us to use this as an example of how to reinforce democratic values across Africa.”
Odinga congratulated Youssouf and wished him success in his new role.
“I want to wish my competitor, Ali Youssouf, all the best and success in his new role. I also want to thank all the member states who voted for me—and those who did not—because, in doing so, they exercised their democratic rights. This is how democracy should work,” he added.
Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja on Monday hinted at plans to defect from President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance (UDA) Party to Raila Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) Party ahead of the next election.
Sakaja made the revelation during a prayer event in support of Odinga, who is vying for the African Union Commission Chairperson seat.
In what appeared to be a clear endorsement of Raila, the ODM leader urged Nairobi leaders to remain united and entrusted Governor Sakaja with the responsibility of overseeing the city’s political affairs in his absence.
Referring to Sakaja as his son, Raila assured ODM members in the capital that they should remain steadfast while he is away, as the governor would take charge of political matters.
“I want Nairobi to remain united and strong. My son here will take charge,” Raila said, pointing at Sakaja during the prayer meeting at the Bomas of Kenya.
Senior ODM Party officials, including Chairperson Gladys Wanga and Makadara MP George Aladwa, who also serves as the Nairobi ODM chairperson, praised Sakaja for collaborating closely with the Orange Party.
“I want to thank, in a special way, our Governor of Nairobi for standing with our party despite not being a member. I kindly urge him to leave UDA and join ODM so that we can move forward together,” said Aladwa.
Governor Wanga, on her part, thanked Sakaja for his role in organizing the event and acknowledged his alignment with ODM, which enjoys significant support in Nairobi County.
“We thank Sakaja for standing with ODM in Nairobi. As Aladwa has said, I urge Sakaja to seriously consider joining us,” Wanga stated.
Sakaja, a member of the ruling UDA party, attended the event, which was organized by women affiliated with ODM. During the gathering, he announced plans to convene a meeting with ODM women leaders in Nairobi to clarify his political direction ahead of the 2027 elections.
Quoting a Swahili proverb, Sakaja said, “Dalili ya mvua ni mawingu na mwenye macho haambiwi tazama.” Loosely translated, this means, “The signs of rain are heavy clouds, and those with eyes do not need to be reminded to see them. I must respond to the requests made to me. We are together in this.”
Potential Fallout Within ODM?
Should Sakaja join ODM as suggested, his decision could spark internal tensions within the party. Three weeks ago, Embakasi East MP Babu Owino expressed dissatisfaction with Sakaja’s leadership, accusing him of poor governance and urging ODM not to support him.
Speaking during a public address, Babu criticized the governor’s performance, citing alleged corruption, inefficiency in service delivery, and a lack of progress in key areas.
“Nairobi deserves better. Despite a budget of over Sh40 billion, the county is collecting less revenue and performing poorly in service delivery. Governor Sakaja’s leadership has failed to meet the expectations of Nairobi residents,” Babu stated.
The outspoken MP also addressed rumors about Raila potentially endorsing Sakaja for a second term.
“Baba should know better. Sakaja has always opposed Raila’s presidency and consistently voted for his opponents since 2007. He is not one of us; he comes with dirty hands,” Babu said, alluding to Sakaja’s past political affiliations.
Babu further accused Sakaja of engaging in public relations stunts, including accompanying Raila on foreign trips as part of his campaign for the African Union Chairperson seat.
“These trips are mere theatrical PR gimmicks. Nairobians need a leader focused on solving local issues, not globetrotting for photo ops,” he added.
The MP hinted at growing discontent among political aspirants eyeing the Nairobi gubernatorial seat in the next election.
“Over 20 candidates are preparing to challenge the current regime because of its failures. Baba should recognize those who genuinely love and support him, like myself,” Babu said.
This public critique comes amid mounting concerns over Nairobi’s governance, with residents expressing frustration over persistent issues such as waste management, insecurity, and stalled projects.
Coast Elected leaders allied to the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) have endorsed former Mombasa Governor Hassan Ali Joho for president in 2027.
The leaders said it was time Coast had their own in the race to statehouse so as to become the sixth president of the Republic of Kenya.
Speaking during food distribution exercise for Muslims during the Holy Month of Ramadhan at Nidhamia hall in Malindi attended by over 10 legislators including Senators, Women Reps and MPs for Kilifi, Mombasa and Kwale the leaders openly told Joho who was present to soldier on his agenda as he had the full backing of the leaders.
Those present included host and vocal Malindi MP Amina Mnyazi, Kilifi Senator Stwart Madzayo, Kwale Senator Boy Juma Boy, Mombasa Senator Mohamed Faki,Kilifi Woman Rep Getrude Mbeyu , Mombasa Woman Rep Zamzam Mohamed MPs Mishi Mboko, Kisauni MP Rashid Benzimba, Magarini MP Harrison Kombe, Mombasa Woman Rep Zamzam Mohamed,Mvita MP Machele Mohamed
Also present were a host of MCA s from Mombasa Kilifi and Kwale together with ODM Youth Fikirini Jacobs, among others.
Joho while accepting the endorsement since his declaration of interest to become president others have begun telling him to go slow and talk with others.
He said it’s time for him to become the party leader and will not step back until he becomes president.
Kilifi Senator Stewart Madzayo on his part urged Coast resident to desist from being divided on political grounds and remain united to make sure Joho becomes president.
He said once Raila goes to the AUC then he should be succeeded by Mombasa Governor Hassan Ali Joho.
“Of all those who want to succeed Raila no one matches Joho, no one, so all of us as brothers lets unite and ensure we support Joho,” he said.
The Vocal Malindi Member of Parliament Amina Mnyazi openly told the constituents to allow her to accompany joho in his countrywide campaigns for his presidency as she was determined to see him win the top seat.
A section of Coast ODM leadership endorsing Joho.
She said it’s time for Coastal leaders to come together and show full support for Joho’s presidential bid as he was the only leader to take the region to another level.
“We want all of you and even the Media to ensure that Joho is all over the social media mainstream media like NTV Citizen, all of the other mainstream media,” he said.
Mombasa Woman Rep Zamzam Mohamed and Likoni MP Mishi Mboko said the Whole Coast region was supporting Joho and asked all leaders to support his bid.
Kilifi Woman Rep Getrude Mbeyu said the former Mombasa Governor is over qualified as education was fine, and is also wealthy.
“It’s only Joho who can defeat President Ruto . He does not fear anything and is the only one who took the former President Uhuru Kenyatta head on in Mombasa previously,” she said.
Shela Ward MCA Twahir Abdulkharim urged all ODM leaders to support Joho as he was the only one who had the muscles to defeat President Ruto.
Magarini MP Harrison Kombe said immediately ODM Party leader Raila Odinga becomes the AUC chairman Joho should take the mantle.
“If the country is one lets shun from tribalism the ODM party leader is Joho,” he said.
Fikirini Jacobs ODM Youth from Kilifi County said its time for Coast to produce the president and urged all Coastal leaders to support him for his bid as he has fought hard to be where he is today.
Former Nairobi Governor Dr. Evans Kidero has ditched Raila Odinga’s ODM in his quest to become the next governor of Homa Bay County.
Kidero made the bold move after the former Prime Minister locked him out of the party by handing his competitor a direct ODM ticket to contest for the gubernatorial seat.
The inaugural governor of the Kenya’s capital announced that he will now vie for the Homa Bay top seat as an independent candidate citing dictatorship and favoritism in Odinga’s ODM party.
The deep pocketed Kidero who is also facing corruption charges stated that his move was informed by Odinga’s habit of handing direct tickets to his preferred candidates and denying the people opportunity to make their choices.
This comes after Odinga chose to gift Homa Bay Woman Representative Gladys Wanga with a direct ticket and tied former Kasipul Kabondo MP, Oyugi Magwanga, as her running mate.
“I do not recognize the alleged consensus that saw the rights of our people trampled on by a few self-seekers who intend to retain the status quo. I have been inundated with calls, with people asking me to soldier on with my candidature” Kidero said.
ODM leader Raila Odinga and H/Bay gubernatorial aspirant Gladys Wanga [p/courtesy] ODM party has been under criticism for its new culture of handing over direct tickets to candidates favored by the party leadership or those with deep pockets in areas where it is popular.
Magwanga who is being forced to shelve his ambitions to become Wanga’s running mate was rigged out by ODM in 2017 polls after the party stuck with dismally performing Governor Cyprian Awiti whose term will expire in August.
There is also public outcry in Mombasa county where ODM appears hellbent to hand a direct ticket to a candidate who will be favored by Odinga or the ODM party because they lack the capacity to conduct credible nominations.
But in the Homa Bay case Kidero has noted that interests of the people were ignored by ODM when they handed the party ticket to the Homa-Bay Woman Rep.
Pundits argue that Mrs Wanga can make a governor who can be easily manipulated by Odinga for kickbacks from looted funds.
“As I welcome those who previously believed on the contrary opinion propagated by my former opponents into the Homabay race, I wish to let them know that all of us are members of Homabay County,” Kidero added.
This move then leaves the Homa Bay race to be a Kidero vs Odinga affair as the people of the lake side county remain struggling to have their own choice in leadership to realize the benefits of devolution.
The current administration which was also influenced by Odinga in 2013 and 2017 has nothing to show of its decade long stay in power except rampant corruption and looting of public money.
Though Kidero has not taken Raila head on as he supports his presidential bid, the latest developments will see him face off with Raila’s project to rescue the people of HomaBay from looming status quo.
Homa Bay race has been staged managed by Odinga who has forced aspirants who were eyeing the ODM ticket to shelve their ambitions and back Wanga.
Just a week ago, ODM Chairman John Mbadi was coerced to drop out of the race and pave wave for Odinga’s favorite Gladys Wanga.
Mbadi heeded the call but in a statement issued on Monday, he claimed that his decision was a compromise as he chose to serve national interests and those of Raila Odinga.
“I have today withdrawn my bid from the Homabay County gubernatorial race. I will therefore henceforth place more effort in the Azimio presidential bid and the nationwide bid to have ODM secure as many seats as possible,” Mbadi said.
