Tag: National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF)

  • Health Crisis: SHA Declines To Onboard Teachers

    Health Crisis: SHA Declines To Onboard Teachers

    The fate of more than 360,000 teachers and their dependents under the Teachers Service Commission (TSC) medical scheme remains in limbo after the Social Health Authority (SHA) declined to absorb them, citing inadequate capacity and prohibitive costs.

    Appearing before the National Assembly’s Education Committee, TSC CEO Nancy Macharia revealed that although the government allocated Sh20 billion to the scheme, SHA required Sh37 billion to onboard the teachers—a gap that also hindered the now-defunct National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) from taking them on.

    “This budget deficit has been a consistent obstacle,” said Macharia. “Even last year, when we considered transitioning to SHA, they told us they lacked the necessary infrastructure and needed Sh37 billion. We currently run the scheme with Sh20 billion.”

    As a result, TSC renewed a three-year contract with Minet Insurance in December 2022, which runs until November 2025.

    The Minet-administered scheme has drawn sharp criticism from lawmakers, who described it as a “mongrel system” riddled with inefficiencies, delays, and lack of compassion.

    Igembe North MP Julius Taitum questioned the lack of competition in the tendering process, hinting at a possible monopoly. “Is it that other insurers avoid applying because they know it’s being handled haphazardly, to the detriment of teachers?” he asked.

    Teso South MP Mary Emase gave an emotional account of teachers left waiting for hours or denied care due to approval delays. “Some are told they’re pretending to be sick. Teachers at Bungoma Life Care have waited endlessly for approval,” she said.

    Committee Chair Julius Melly called the scheme dysfunctional, citing cases such as a teacher being detained at a Nairobi hospital for 90 days over delayed payments. “This scheme has no head or tail. It must be overhauled,” he said.

    Macharia blamed delayed government disbursements for many of the issues, saying providers sometimes withdraw services when funds are late.

    “If our teachers were to get the best medical care, they would need full insurance coverage. That’s not the case now due to budget constraints,” she said.

    Lawmakers urged a complete restructure of the scheme. Melly proposed splitting teachers into clusters handled by different insurers to decentralize services and improve efficiency.

    “With Bliss Healthcare as the master capitator, approval processes are overwhelmed,” said Luanda MP Dick Maungu. “Why not break it down into clusters for better management?”

    Baringo North MP John Makilap warned that unless drastic changes are made before the contract expires in 2025, teachers will continue to suffer. “This amorphous setup won’t work. We must divide them into cohorts or transition to SHA,” he said.

    Taitum called for a full probe into the consortium running the scheme. “Teachers won’t get justice from this setup. We need a full-day interrogation of the service provider.”

    Defending the current model, TSC Director of Legal Services Cavin Anyour said the consortium includes top-tier insurers. “Minet leads a group of eight top providers. Those who were left out lacked the capacity to deliver,” he said.

  • Only 815 Ex-NHIF Staff to Transition to SHA

    Only 815 Ex-NHIF Staff to Transition to SHA

    Members of Parliament (MPs) have been informed that less than half of the defunct National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) former employees will be absorbed into  the newly established Social Health Authority (SHA).

    The lawmakers have been informed that Out of 1,737 ex-staff, only 815 will transition to SHA, while the remaining 922 will be redeployed elsewhere within the public service.

    The revelation was made during a session with the National Assembly’s Health Committee on Monday, February 10, 2025, where Health Principal Secretary Harry Kimtai and acting SHA Chief Executive Robert Ingasira provided updates on the staff transition process. The Public Service Commission (PSC) has approved the new staff establishment for SHA, capping the number of employees at 815.

    The transition process, which began on November 21, 2024, when the PSC took over the 1,737 ex-NHIF staff, is expected to last six months or until SHA completes its recruitment process, whichever comes first. Suitability tests for the ex-NHIF staff transitioning to SHA are set to begin before the end of February 2025, ensuring that only qualified individuals are retained in the new health authority.

    Legal Framework and Staff Rights

    The transition is guided by Clause 6 of the First Schedule of the Social Health Insurance (SHI) Act 2023, which mandates that SHA competitively recruit its staff while giving priority to suitably qualified ex-NHIF employees. Those not appointed by SHA have the option to either retire from public service or be redeployed within the public service.

    Mr. Kimtai emphasized that the SHA Board has consulted both the Attorney General and the PSC to ensure a smooth transition. He also assured lawmakers that the Ministry of Health is closely monitoring the process to prevent any irregularities. “If anything goes wrong, I assure you that will be reversed. The law must be followed,” he said, referencing a recent incident where a decision by the SHA Board chairman was overturned for non-compliance with legal provisions.

    Concerns Over Favoritism and Morale

    However, the transition has not been without controversy. Lawmakers raised concerns about favoritism and unilateral appointments within SHA, which they claim have demoralized staff. Nyeri Town MP Duncan Mathenge pointed out that senior officers were bypassed in favor of juniors for key positions, leading to systemic failures within the authority.

    “The staff of SHA is very demoralized. Senior officers have been bypassed by juniors in the appointment of directors or heads of departments,” Mathenge said. Mogotio MP Rueben Kiborek echoed these sentiments, criticizing the SHA leadership for mishandling ex-NHIF staff during the transition and calling for the speedy recruitment of a substantive chief executive to bring stability to the organization.

    Accountability and Next Steps

    Committee chair Robert Pukose warned that the committee would launch an inquiry into the transition process and hold accountable anyone found to have engaged in favoritism or cronyism. “We will not tolerate any irregularities in the recruitment and appointment process,” Pukose said.

    The SHA, which replaces NHIF as the body overseeing Kenya’s social health insurance, is a cornerstone of the government’s Universal Health Coverage (UHC) agenda. Its successful establishment is critical to ensuring seamless healthcare services for millions of Kenyans.

    As the suitability tests approach, all eyes will be on the SHA and the Ministry of Health to ensure that the transition is transparent, fair, and in line with the SHI Act 2023. The coming weeks will be pivotal in determining whether the new authority can overcome its teething problems and deliver on its mandate to provide affordable and accessible healthcare to all Kenyans.

  • Explainer: The Difference Between SHIF and NHIF

    Explainer: The Difference Between SHIF and NHIF

    The transition from the National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) to the Social Health Authority (SHA) will officially begin on October 1, 2024, as part of the government’s efforts to improve health coverage for all Kenyans.

    President William Ruto introduced SHA as a replacement for NHIF, which has been in operation for over two decades.

    Ruto stated that the new system aims to address gaps in NHIF and provide better services to all Kenyans, regardless of their economic status.

    While , they also have distinct differences and similarities.

    The Key differences between SHA and NHIF;

     Legal framework

    SHA is established under the Social Health Insurance Act of 2023, which repealed the NHIF Act of 1998. The new model introduces three distinct funds:

    – The Primary Healthcare Fund (PHCF)

    – The Social Health Insurance Fund (SHIF)

    – The Emergency, Chronic, and Critical Illness Fund (ECCIF)

    Access to healthcare

    Under SHA, members can access primary health services and emergency treatment simply by registering as a member. Unlike the NHIF, there is no requirement to have up-to-date payments to access outpatient services.

    NHIF’s coverage was more limited, especially for people with chronic conditions.

    Outpatient services

    SHA offers a wider range of outpatient services regardless of the patient’s premium payment status. While NHIF focused more on curative and rehabilitative care, SHA includes preventive, promotive, curative, rehabilitative, and palliative care.

    Inpatient services

    NHIF covered the cost of disease management during hospital admissions in wards, critical care units, or palliative care units.

    Starting in October, SHA will standardise the daily treatment rate across hospitals based on their facility level, with an increased per-day rate of 12 percent.

    Maternal care

    Under NHIF, delivery costs for expectant mothers were covered as long as their membership was up-to-date.

    On the other hand, SHA guarantees coverage for all deliveries and ensures every mother has insurance through full membership in SHIF. Expectant women unable to afford coverage will be identified at registration using a means-testing tool.

    Linda Mama program

    Previously, the Linda Mama program funded antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care services.

    Government hospitals were reimbursed between Sh2,500 and Sh5,000 for normal deliveries, while private and faith-based facilities received between Sh3,500 and Sh17,000.

    Under SHA, the normal delivery tariff will be Sh10,000, and Sh30,000 for C-section deliveries.

    Renal Care services

    NHIF covered hemodialysis for advanced kidney failure with a limit of two sessions per week.

    SHA has expanded this to include three monthly Erythropoietin injections. The reimbursement for peritoneal dialysis has increased from Sh76,000 to Sh85,200, reducing out-of-pocket expenses by Sh9,200 per month.

    The cost of renal replacement therapy (kidney transplant) has also risen, with surgery costs increasing from Sh450,000 to Sh700,000.

    Mental health services

    NHIF’s mental health coverage was limited to detoxification and rehabilitation for beneficiaries with substance abuse issues, reimbursed at Sh60,000 with a copay.

    SHA on the other hand reduces the out-of-pocket payment for this package by Sh7,200. It also includes coverage for managing sickle cell disease, therapeutic aphaeresis, and the diagnosis and staging of cancer, which were not covered previously.

    Surgical tariffs

    SHA standardises surgical tariffs across all healthcare providers, whereas NHIF’s tariffs were limited to government and select private and faith-based facilities.

    SHA will also contract foreign healthcare providers and negotiate treatment costs to enhance affordability, compared to the previous Sh500,000 overseas reimbursements.

    New services

    SHA also introduces new services not covered under NHIF, such as screening for common health conditions and cancers. It also covers the cost of consultation, preventive, and restorative treatments like extractions and scaling, as well as resuscitation and stabilisation for critical conditions.

    Patients with permanent physical or sensory disabilities will be provided with necessary assistive devices.

    SHA represents a major shift in Kenya’s health insurance model, with a focus on comprehensive coverage and accessibility.

    The new system aims to provide better health services for all Kenyans, addressing the limitations of the NHIF and expanding the scope of care to include preventive and chronic illness management.

  • MPs Protest Over Sh104.8B Healthcare IT System Procurement, Directs AG Not To Approve Deal

    MPs Protest Over Sh104.8B Healthcare IT System Procurement, Directs AG Not To Approve Deal

    Members of Parliament have expressed concerns regarding the Ministry of Health’s procurement process for the Integrated Healthcare Information Technology System (IHTS), a key component of the Universal Health Program.

    The contract, valued at Ksh 104.8 billion (including taxes), is set to be implemented over 12 years, with Safaricom PLC as the lead partner in the consortium responsible for the project.

    The procurement was conducted under the Specially Permitted Procurement Procedure (SPPP) and involves the development of a comprehensive digital healthcare platform.

    However, MPs, particularly members of the Departmental Committee on Health, are questioning the role of Safaricom PLC in leading the consortium despite its limited stake in the project—approximately 13%—while Apiero Limited holds more than 50%. The consortium also includes Konvergenz Network Solutions.

    Endebess MP Dr. Robert Pukose, who chairs the departmental committee on Health raised doubts over Safaricom PLC’s involvement, suggesting that the telecom giant may be lending its name to boost the credibility of its consortium partners, such as Apiero Limited, which lacks experience in managing large-scale healthcare IT systems.

    “Although Safaricom PLC’s role appears minimal, it seems to serve as the public face of the project, potentially masking the inexperience of its partners,” Dr. Pukose remarked.

    He further called on the Ministry of Health, led by the Cabinet Secretary and Principal Secretary, to appear before the committee on Monday, September 30, 2024, at 10:00 AM to explain the rationale for opting for single-sourcing under the SPPP.

    Dr. Pukose also questioned why the ministry bypassed the existing National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) IT system, which has been functional, in favor of this new system.

    Dr. Pukose voiced frustration over the Ministry’s decision to sideline the NHIF IT system, which he argued has been effectively serving the public.

    He noted that trials of the new system in Marsabit and Tharaka Nithi counties have yielded poor results.

    “They’ve tested the new system in Marsabit and Tharaka Nithi counties, and it failed. It’s unclear why the Ministry is so insistent on replacing a system that has been working. Instead, they should be focusing on enhancing the current NHIF IT system to include all registered members,” he said.

    Dr. Pukose urged the Ministry to reconsider its approach, suggesting a gradual implementation of any new systems rather than an abrupt overhaul of the existing framework.

    Meanwhile, the committee has requested the Attorney General not to approve the contract, citing concerns over potential corruption, single-sourcing, and the lack of tender documents and public participation in the process.

    On Tuesday, the committee resolved to summon Cabinet Secretaries John Mbadi (Treasury) and Dr. Debra Mulongo Barasa (Health), along with the Attorney General, to clarify discrepancies in the technical evaluation process.

    “We expect them to appear before the committee on Monday, September 30, 2024, to address our concerns regarding the procurement of the Integrated Healthcare Information Technology System,” Dr. Pukose stated.

    He also noted the absence of a formal response from the Attorney General regarding the legal clearance of the contract.

    “The process appears flawed. From what we’ve seen, this looks like fraud in the making. That’s why we need full transparency before we make any decisions,” he concluded.

  • Escobar Kenya Ltd Involvement In Sh34M NHIF Fraud Unearthed

    Escobar Kenya Ltd Involvement In Sh34M NHIF Fraud Unearthed

    The Assets Recovery Agency has moved to court seeking orders to freeze the bank accounts of a man suspected to be involved in the Sh 34,441,587.35 Kenyatta National Hospital scam.

    Eric Nguku Mbiu who is the director of Escobar Kenya Limited is suspected to be part of a syndicate involved in a money laundering scheme which fraudulently diverted the above funds from KNH. The funds were intended for repayment of KNH staff loan.

    According to the investigating officer Kipkurui Serem, Mbiu’s company was registered in 2014 and has a bank account at the National Bank of Kenya which holds Sh 14,280,345.80. He is the sole signatory and ultimate beneficiary of his company’s account.

    He also holds a personal account at the same bank which holds Sh 358,556.33.

    The court heard that the company’s account received Sh Sh 34,441,587.35 on 7th June 2023.

    “Preliminary invstigations established that the funds originated from Kenyatta National Hospital,” the investigator said.

    KNH confirmed vide a letter dated 14th September 2023 that the Sh 34 million which was designated for their NBK Harambee Avenue loan account was diverted to Mbiu’s company account held at the said bank.

    The investigator added that after the funds were received in the said account, the respondent withdrew Sh 21,161,241.55 in cash.

    The tender

    Mbiu, in support of the funds received from the hospital, explained the money was received pursuant to a tender for the supply, delivery, installation, testing and commissioning of interventional radiology issued by KNH and provided supporting documents which included a local purchase order dated 13th October 2022.

    The respondent is alleged to have confirmed the same to the investigators in his recorded statement dated 3rd October 2023.

    According to investigations, the said tender had been advertised by KNH for the proposed construction and equipping of interventional radiology suite.

    However, the said tender was cancelled and the same communicated to the bidding companies vide a letter dated 8th March 2023.

    It was also established that the respondent did not receive the cancellation letter since he had not submitted a bid for the tender as evidenced by the tender opening register.

    A forensic examiner established that the documents submitted by Mbiu in support of the said tender were forged.

    “Further preliminary invstigations have established that the respondent colluded with KNH staff to transfer Sh 34,441,587.35 from Kenyatta National Hospital to the 1st respondent’s bank account by use of forged documents,” officer Serem told the court.

    In addition, investigations revealed that the fraudulent transfer of the said funds was executed by altering entry number 62 of the payroll administration account no. 01003058005000.

    Serem said that the fraud was executed by maintaining the beneficiary institution name as National Bank of Kenya Limited but altering the beneficiary account number to include 01037134639000 held at the said bank in the name of Escobar Kenya Limited.

    He added that there is reasonable grounds to believe that respondent’s bank accounts were used as conduits of money laundering in an effort to conceal and disguise the nature, source, disposition or movement of the illicit funds.

  • RFH Healthcare, Four Other Private Hospitals Under Probe Over Multimillion NHIF Fraud

    RFH Healthcare, Four Other Private Hospitals Under Probe Over Multimillion NHIF Fraud

    RFH Healthcare is amongst the five healthcare providers that have allegedly been engaged in a multimillion National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) scam. This is according to a petition filled by an activist to the Meru County Assembly.

    Mr Salesio Thuranira has accused five private hospitals over claims of swindling elderly residents in the pretence of treating arthritis.

    He has named Afya Bora Hospital Annex, RFH Healthcare, Joy Nursing & Maternity, St Peters Hospital and Jekim Hospital based in Mwea, Nairobi and Meru, as institutions that should be probed.

    “The hospitals … are well coordinated in an illegal scheme of treating Meru residents aged 44 years and above, in the pretence of curing arthritis by surgery or unknown injections,” Mr Thuranira states in the petition.

    He claims that the that the hospitals have been working with a woman identified as Winfred Kathure who recruits patients before they are ferried to Nairobi for the alleged treatment.

    “Winfred goes around the villages and scouts for elderly people suffering from arthritis and holders of active NHIF cards. She lures them without the knowledge of their relatives to attend surgeries in the hospitals. For every client she convinces, she is paid Sh1,500,” the petition reads.

    Mr Thuranira claims that some patients were being admitted to hostels without proper amenities, where they get injections before being discharged.

    “Upon discharge, they usually receive a message from NHIF indicating that Sh300,000 has been deducted for surgery,” he states.

    In supposed of his allegations, the activist has listed six people in his petition that have supposedly fallen prey and swindled by the hospitals.

    He now wants the assembly to wants the assembly to summon the proprietors of the five hospitals to answer to the issues raised in the petition as it is a matter of public interest.

    RFH Healthcare owner Dr Maxwell Okoth.

    Meru Assembly Speaker Ayub Bundi, who read the petition to the members, directed the Health committee to investigate the allegations and table a report by May 31, 2023.

    National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) loses Sh10 billion every year through fraudulent claims.

    NHIF Chief Executive Officer Peter Kamunyo said the funds are lost through impersonation and fictitious claims by public and private hospitals thus denying millions of deserving Kenyans quality health care.

    The CEO said some hospitals present claims of major surgeries when a patient has undergone a minor procedure.

    Last year, the Ethics and Anticorruption Commission (EACC) renewed its efforts to deal with dozens of hospitals involved in corrupt deals touching on NHIF claims.

    In addition to that, the anti-graft body disclosed that it was investigating individuals who connived with the hospitals to defraud the fund of millions of shillings through fictitious claims.

    In the last couple of years, some private hospitals were in the limelight after it emerged that they had defrauded NHIF through fake medical claims.

  • DCI To Question NHIF CEO Kamunyo Over Sh200M Missing Funds

    DCI To Question NHIF CEO Kamunyo Over Sh200M Missing Funds

    Embattled National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Peter Kamunyo could be cited for lying under oath over unexplained excess spending amounting Sh200million on the National Police Service comprehensive medical cover.

    It has now been established that Kamunyo and other senior managers will be questioned by sleuths from the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) over possible embezzlement of public coffers through irregular claims.

    Despite saying they had unanimously settled with the user department, the Ministry of Interior and Coordination of National Government, Interior Principal Secretary discounted the claims as untrue and misleading.

    “It is not the business of the NHIF CEO to decide unilaterally how to spend the excess of loss cover.”Kibicho told the committee.

    Instead, while appearing before the Opiyo Wadayi led Public Accounts Committee (PAC), Kibicho said they resorted to withholding subscriptions after their numerous letters to NHIF went unanswered.

    “In the meantime, we have in total withheld Sh400 million out of the amounts due to them for 2020-21 and 2021-22 financial years,” Kibicho said.

    Auditor General Nancy Gathungu in her 2019/20 audit report said there was no evidence of any employee exceeding the limit, hence, the money should have been refunded

    The deal was that the employer was to authorise any spending of the extra amount before it is used.

    Although the amount was refundable at the end of the contract period, Gathungu, in the audit report before the PAC, noted that it was yet to be refunded.

    For the two years of the contract, NHIF did not refund the extra amount claiming it was used by police officers who exceeded their limits raising the questionable excess spending from the initial Sh200million to the current Sh400million.

    The period in question is the financial year 2018/19.

    The deal was that the employer was to authorise any spending of the extra amount before it is used.

    Under the cover, NPS procured a comprehensive medical cover for a period of two years commencing October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2019.

    The tender was awarded to NHIF at a contract sum of Sh4.7 billion inclusive of Sh200 million for excess loss cover to cushion members who might exhaust their limits.

    On June 30, 2021, the contract was awarded to NHIF at Sh3.29 billion.

    According to Kibicho, they had not made any authorisation even as NHIF claimed the monies were used to cover those who had depleted their normal cover.

    In September this year, Kamunyo said NHIF loses Sh10 billion every year through fraudulent claims through impersonation and fictitious claims by public and private hospitals thus denying millions of deserving Kenyans quality health care.

    He noted that out of the Sh61 billion collected from formal, informal sector and sponsored members in the last financial year more than 91 per cent was paid out to claims from the hospitals across the country amounting to Sh54 billion.

    The national insurer has 7,666 healthcare providers empaneled by NHIF including 5,833 government facilities which make 75 per cent of the providers, 1,619 private hospitals representing 21 per cent healthcare providers, and 314 faith-based facilities (four per cent).

    NHIF operates 156 service points across the country comprising of 70 branch offices, 33 satellite offices and service desks and counters in all 53 Huduma Centres.

    Currently, NHIF covers more than 23 million Kenyans, with 10.1 million being principal contributors and the rest are dependents including spouses and children.

    Previously, NHIF was not allowed to engage in the provision of commercial insurance services to public entities and private companies as provided for under section 19 of the Insurance Act.

    However, through a Gazette notice of April 17, 2020, Treasury Cabinet Secretary Ukur Yattani exempted NHIF from the provisions of the law, effectively allowing the public insurer to engage in the insurance business.

    Section 19 of the Insurance Act provides that any insurance provider operating in the country must be registered with the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA), the industry regulator. NHIF is not a member of the IRA.

    In 2012, the government-mandated NHIF to provide medical cover to civil servants and members of the disciplined services – the police and prison officers.

    The government cited the high cost of private insurance and lack of structures to provide a medical cover of such a magnitude.

  • NHIF CEO Kamunyo On The Spot Over Questioned Sh400M Cash

    NHIF CEO Kamunyo On The Spot Over Questioned Sh400M Cash

    The National Hospital Insurance Fund (NHIF) Chief Executive Officer Dr. Peter Kamunyo is on the spot over failure to explain how Sh200 million in excess of loss insurance cover for the police and prison officers was exhausted.

    It all started when Auditor General Nancy Gathungu flagged the use of the amount which was in the account of the Interior Ministry. The period in question is the financial year 2018/19.

    While the NHIF CEO, who is also the accounting officer, had earlier said that the matter was settled between him and Interior Principal Secretary Dr. Karanja Kibicho, it now appears nothing of the sort happened.

    It is Dr. Kibicho who spilled the beans when he appeared before the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Tuesday, by dismissing the claims that the matter had been resolved.

    It now appears the NHIF boss misled the Opiyo Wandayi led committee.

    The PS told the committee that the NHIF boss was yet to explain how another Sh200 million excess of loss cover flagged in the Ministry’s accounts for the 2019/20 financial year, was used.

    The amount in question has now shot to a whopping Sh400 million, with Dr. Kamunyo unable to explain how the money was spent.

    “NHIF has not explained to us how the excess of loss covers for the financial years 2018/19 and 2019/20 was used. It is good if you summon the NHIF CEO quickly so that he can explain how the money was expended,” Dr. Kibicho said.

    The excess loss amount was part of the Sh4.79 billion comprehensive medical cover awarded to NHIF on September 26, 2017.

    The cash was meant to cushion members of the national police service who might exhaust their cover limits.

    The insurance cover was a two-year period- from October 1, 2017, up to September 30, 2019, but was extended from October 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020.

    On June 30, 2021, the contract was awarded to NHIF at Sh3.29 billion.

    Dr. Kibicho has since asked the committee to summon the NHIF CEO, for him to explain how the money was exhausted.

    Did Dr. Kamunyo mislead the committee while on oath? All witnesses appearing before the committee are required to take an oath committing to speak the truth.

    With the oath, a witness is held to account for his or her words. Those who lie under oath risk facing perjury proceedings.

    Under Article 125 of the constitution, parliament and its committees have been likened to a court of law with the force to summon witnesses to appear before them to provide information.

    “The issue of numbers of the police officers who may have benefitted as explained by Dr. Kamunyo almost became clear but the authorization was worrying,” the Ugunja Member of Parliament said.

    On his part, Garissa Township Member of Parliament Aden Duale pointed out that, “Had you (PS Kibicho) not raised this matter, as a committee we would have marked it as resolved.”

    The Interior Principal Secretary said, “it is not the business of the NHIF CEO to decide unilaterally how to spend the excess of loss cover.”

    Until the NHIF CEO explains how the excess of loss cover millions was expended, PS Kibicho said the Interior Ministry will slash Sh400 million from the insurance premiums payable to NHIF in police cover.

    “Without evidence authorizing the expenditure of the money, we shall continue to withhold the Sh400 million in premiums to NHIF,” Dr. Kibicho told the committee.

    According to the tender documents signed by the Interior Ministry, National Treasury, and NHIF, the amount was refundable at the end of the contract period.

    The contract further provides that any request for the excess of loss cover can only be authorized by the Inspector General of Police Hillary Mutyambai to NHIF.

    So far, NHIF has not provided evidence that the Inspector General of Police authorized the expenditure.

    “If the IG did not authorize him to expend the money, who allowed him?” Interior Ps rhetorically asked.

    The Inspector-General of Police and PS Kibicho are said to be frustrated with the NHIF boss’s failure to explain how the amount was spent.

    Shahidi News has established that in a letter on February 19, 2021, to the NHIF boss, the Inspector General of Police was adamant that any explanation on the expenditure of the amount must include beneficiary’s name, medical institution, amount, member’s name, date, job group and the total excess of loss cover among others during they contract and extension period. This was critical so as to enable the IG alongside PS Kibicho to adequately respond to audit queries before the watchdog committee.

    Interestingly, Dr. Kamunyo, when he appeared before PAC in June this year, was unable to explain why the money had not been refunded.

    He also did not provide a breakdown of how it was expended, if at all, there are police and prison officers who exceeded their cover limit.

    “Your failure to comply as required by the law led to the Ministry of Interior being cited adversely,” MP Wandayi, then told the NIHIF boss.

    According to the Auditor General, failure to show proof of the expenditure makes it not possible to determine whether the National Police Service got value for money that was due for a refund at the end of the comprehensive medical cover contract.

    In his May 5, 2021, letter to the NHIF boss, Dr. Kibicho requested that it be furnished by May 6, 2021, with a detailed report on the expenditure.

    In the past, NHIF was not allowed to engage in the provision of commercial insurance services to public entities and private companies as provided for under section 19 of the Insurance Act.

    However, through a gazette notice of April 17, 2020, National Treasury Cabinet Secretary Ukur Yattani exempted NHIF from the provisions of the law.

    As a result, the public insurer was permitted to engage in the insurance business.

    Section 19 of the Insurance Act provides that any insurance provider operating in the country must be registered with the Insurance Regulatory Authority (IRA), the industry regulator. NHIF is not a member of the IRA.

    In 2012, the government-mandated NHIF to provide medical cover to civil servants, as well as police and prison officers.

    The move was a result of the high cost of private insurance and the lack of structures to provide a medical cover of such a magnitude.