Tag: Moses Wetangula

  • Wetang’ula Calls for Urgent Reform of Protest Laws To End Rising Violence

    Wetang’ula Calls for Urgent Reform of Protest Laws To End Rising Violence

    National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula has issued a stern call for immediate legislative reforms to address what he describes as the gross abuse of constitutional rights to demonstrate, which has repeatedly resulted in violence, destruction of property, and loss of life across the country.

    Speaking during a Women’s Economic Empowerment Programme in Kabuchoi on Saturday, Wetang’ula expressed deep concern over the recent wave of violent protests that have rocked the nation, describing them as a dangerous distortion of the constitutional freedoms enshrined in Kenya’s 2010 Constitution. The Speaker emphasized that while the Constitution guarantees citizens the right to assemble and protest peacefully, it does not provide license for criminal activities that have increasingly characterized public demonstrations.

    “Let’s be clear. The Constitution guarantees the right to assemble and protest, but it does not give anyone the license to riot, loot, burn property, rape, maim or kill. That is lawlessness, and no society should tolerate it,” Wetang’ula declared to the gathering, which included several prominent Kenya Kwanza leaders.

    The Speaker proposed adopting a legal framework similar to that used in the United Kingdom, where protest organizers can be held personally accountable for violence and property damage that occurs during demonstrations they organize. This model, he argued, would create necessary accountability while preserving legitimate constitutional rights to peaceful assembly.

    Wetang’ula specifically criticized political leaders who incite violence while ensuring their own families remain safe abroad, calling for such leaders to face personal responsibility for the consequences of their actions. He tasked Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah and other Members of Parliament to spearhead the legislative reforms needed to close existing legal loopholes that have allowed violence to flourish under the guise of peaceful protest.

    The Speaker’s remarks come against the backdrop of mounting political tensions following the violent Saba Saba demonstrations that left a trail of destruction across several parts of the country. The Speaker also took aim at former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, whom he accused of exporting Kenya’s political divisions to the diaspora community in the United States.

    “He’s instigating chaos at home, then fleeing to the US to divide the diaspora. The people he’s addressing in America were born there; they don’t know Kenyan tribes. He’s exporting Kenya’s political toxicity abroad,” Wetang’ula said, adding that Gachagua no longer represents anyone in Kenya and urging citizens to reject divisive leadership.

    Majority Leader Ichung’wah, who was present at the event alongside other Kenya Kwanza officials including Senate Majority Whip Silvanus Osoro and several MPs, echoed Wetang’ula’s sentiments with equally strong language. He warned that all individuals connected to the violent protests would face justice regardless of their political status or position.

    “Whether you’re an MP or not, if you planned or sponsored those riots, you will face justice. Even I, as Majority Leader, would not be spared. No one is above the law,” Ichung’wah asserted, in remarks that appeared directed at recently arrested Naivasha MP Jane Kihara, who has been charged in connection with the protests.

    Ichung’wah dismissed claims that the charges against political figures are politically motivated, insisting that those who encouraged youth to engage in looting and destruction must bear responsibility for their actions. He urged those facing charges to accept accountability rather than seeking sympathy, stating bluntly that they should “carry your cross” and seek help from their political sponsors.

    The Majority Leader also issued a specific warning to Rift Valley residents, urging them to resist any attempts to stir tribal conflict and avoid repeating the tragic mistakes of the 2007/2008 post-election violence that claimed over a thousand lives and displaced hundreds of thousands of Kenyans.

    The call for legislative reform comes as the country grapples with finding the right balance between protecting constitutional rights and maintaining public order. The proposed changes would represent the most significant amendment to protest laws since the promulgation of the 2010 Constitution, which expanded democratic freedoms including the right to peaceful assembly and demonstration.

    Legal experts and civil society organizations are likely to closely scrutinize any proposed legislation to ensure that legitimate rights to peaceful protest are not undermined in the pursuit of maintaining order. The challenge will be crafting laws that effectively deter violence while preserving the democratic principles that allow citizens to express dissent and hold their government accountable through peaceful means.

    The reform initiative reflects growing concern among government leaders about the escalation of protest-related violence and the need for clearer legal mechanisms to address the increasingly complex challenges of managing public demonstrations in a democratic society.

  • EALA MPs Fight Erupts into Parliament Scandal: UDA’s Falhada Iman Suspended

    EALA MPs Fight Erupts into Parliament Scandal: UDA’s Falhada Iman Suspended

    In a stunning display of political chaos, a physical altercation between two female lawmakers — Falhada Iman, a UDA-nominated MP representing Kenya in the East African Legislative Assembly (EALA), and Umulkher Harun Mohamed, a nominated Member of Parliament — has exploded into a full-blown scandal.

    The incident, captured on video and widely shared online, has prompted swift disciplinary action from National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetangula.

    The footage, which showed the two engaged in a heated brawl within Parliament, has rocked the political scene and sparked outrage among Kenyans demanding accountability and dignity from their leaders.

    EALA MPs Fight Rocks Parliament

    EALA MPs Fight Rocks Parliament

    Speaker Moses Wetangula addressed the House on Wednesday, April 9, taking decisive action against Falhada Iman for her role in the embarrassing brawl. He suspended her from accessing Parliament buildings and facilities for three months.

    “Honourable Falhada is excluded from accessing Parliament buildings and facilities for a period of 90 days,” Wetangula said. “She may only appear when delivering her written explanation, under escort by the Sergeant-at-Arms.”

    This decision comes after public backlash over the physical fight, which many saw as a disgrace to the institution of Parliament.

    UDA Under Pressure as Falhada Faces Shame

    Falhada Iman, who is affiliated with the ruling UDA party, now stands disgraced. She is required to submit a written apology within the 90-day suspension period.

    The Speaker hinted that her punishment could extend beyond the current measures, depending on the content and sincerity of her apology.

    In response to the public uproar, Iman expressed regret, stating the incident was “beyond the dignity of the House and the trust of the Kenyan people.”

    But critics say the apology isn’t enough — they want real accountability from the leaders they elected.

    The fight between the two legislators, reportedly fueled by long-standing political and personal tensions, quickly turned physical.

    The scandal now threatens to further stain the UDA’s image, already grappling with public discontent over governance and internal divisions.

    Parliament Divided as Harun Gets a Pass—For Now

    Unlike Iman, nominated MP Umulkher Harun has been given a temporary reprieve. Wetangula offered her a chance to explain herself before the House and possibly issue an apology.

    “Given that the incident involved a sitting member and a former member, I am inclined to first accord the current member, Honourable Harun, the opportunity to explain herself and to apologise to the House,” Wetangula explained.

    However, the final decision on her fate remains pending, as the Speaker waits for her explanation and any further developments.

    Harun, in a Facebook post on April 8, blamed Falhada for provoking the altercation.

    “My colleague from EALA, who has long expressed opposition to my work, came to Parliament with the intent to attack me,” Harun wrote. “The ambush caught me off guard. I regret how it all turned out.”

    Her post went viral, drawing mixed reactions. Some sympathized with her, while others criticized both MPs for allowing their disagreements to descend into physical confrontation.

    MPs Warned After Recording EALA Legislators Fight

    The scandal has also raised concerns about transparency and decorum within Parliament. Wetangula warned MPs against recording such incidents, suggesting that the person who filmed the fight could face consequences under the Parliament Powers and Privileges Act.

    “The recording is believed to have been done by a sitting member of the House. If confirmed, it will attract sanctions,” Wetangula warned.

    This move has sparked debate among the public. Some argue that exposing bad behavior should not be punished — that Kenyans have the right to know what happens in Parliament. Others insist MPs must follow rules and maintain order.

  • Court Declines To Suspend Ford Kenya Leadership and Speaker Role

    Court Declines To Suspend Ford Kenya Leadership and Speaker Role

    The Court of Appeal has declined to stay High Court orders regarding the majority coalition in the National Assembly, despite Speaker Moses Wetangula’s decision overturning the declaration on account of autonomy.

    The Court ruled on Friday that granting a stay order would amount to prematurely endorsing the Speaker’s decision, as the High Court had yet to determine whether it complied with its earlier judgment.

    “Even after the contested Speaker’s ruling of 12th February 2025, the National Assembly has continued to discharge its duties, albeit with some acrimony,” the court observed.

    On the claim that the High Court judgment had significantly disrupted parliamentary operations, the Court reiterated that there was no compelling evidence to support this assertion.

    Embarrassment

    Additionally, the Court dismissed concerns that the ruling could lead to legal consequences — such as contempt of court proceedings against Speaker Wetangula.

    “The likelihood of a party being summoned to court to respond to an allegation of contempt of court — and the attendant inconvenience or embarrassment that may result — is not sufficient reason to stay court proceedings,” the Court noted.

    Regarding Wetangula’s dual role as Speaker of the National Assembly and leader of Ford Kenya, the Court stated that no dispositive order had been issued by the High Court on the matter.

    “In such circumstances, we cannot pronounce ourselves on the same in an application for stay of proceedings or execution as the one before us. We can only stay a positive order that was issued by the trial court,” the court determined.

    Wetangula had appealed the ruling, arguing that it had severely disrupted legislative functions.

    However, the Court dismissed this claim, stating that there was insufficient evidence to prove the claim.

  • Looming Fallout: Azimio Threatens To Impeach Wetangula

    Looming Fallout: Azimio Threatens To Impeach Wetangula

    The opposition coalition has threatened to impeach National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetangula over alleged impartiality in his ruling, which contradicted a High Court decision declaring the Azimio coalition as the majority in Parliament.

    Minority Leader Junet Mohammed criticized Wetangula’s handling of the matter, accusing him of inconsistencies regarding the status of 14 MPs who defected from Azimio after signing post-election agreements with Kenya Kwanza.

    “When he made his first ruling, which was overturned by the court, he claimed the 14 members were part of Kenya Kwanza. Now, he says they are in political limbo—neither in Azimio nor Kenya Kwanza. This is a deliberate manipulation of numbers to ensure Kenya Kwanza remains the majority,” Junet said.

    The Suna East MP also questioned why the Jubilee Party was now being considered part of Azimio, despite Wetang’ula’s previous ruling stating that the party had defected to Kenya Kwanza.

    “We have always maintained that Jubilee is still part of Azimio, yet today he says the party is in Azimio. This ruling is full of contradictions and will be overturned in court, just like the previous one. Parliament is not immune to constitutional interpretation by the courts—it is not a court of appeal,” he added.

    Suppression

    The opposition also took issue with Deputy Speaker Gladys Boss for writing to the Registrar of Political Parties to seek details on post-election agreements, questioning her motives.

    “It’s going to be messy and noisy, and there will be casualties, I can promise you. The way Parliament is being handled is alarming. While we see broad-based governance in the Executive, Parliament is becoming one-sided,” Junet warned.

    Minority Whip Millie Odhiambo reiterated that political agreements must be guided by the law and accused the Speaker of deliberately suppressing Azimio’s numbers.

    “The 14 members who are supposedly in a political vacuum have done so to deny Azimio its rightful majority. Despite shifting political alliances, legal frameworks must be respected,” she stated.

    Minority Deputy Party Leader Robert Mbui also condemned Wetang’ula’s conduct, accusing him of bias and suppressing opposition voices during debates.

    “We have confirmed that the Speaker is not impartial. Throughout the debate, we noticed he was silencing us and blocking some of us from contributing. This is unacceptable and amounts to poor parliamentary practice,” Mbui said.

    Contested ruling

    Wetangula upheld the Kenya Kwanza Alliance as the majority coalition in the National Assembly in a fresh declaration following the High Court decision nullifying his initial declaration.

    In his ruling on the implications of the court decision on House proceedings, the Speaker cited post-election agreements filed with the Registrar of Political Parties as a key factor in determining the majority status.

    He referenced coalition agreements from the Registrar, which indicated that 14 MPs from five political parties had exited Azimio La Umoja, thereby denying the opposition coalition the majority status it sought.

    “Arising from the foregoing, the Kenya Kwanza Coalition is the Majority Party, and the Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Coalition Party is the Minority Party in the House,” Wetangula ruled.

    A letter from the Registrar of Political Parties confirmed the formal exit from Azimio by the People’s Liberation Party, Maendeleo Chap Chap Party, Devolution Empowerment Party, United Democratic Movement, and the Pamoja African Alliance.

  • ‘I Will Not Resign,’ Speaker Wetang’ula Dismisses Court Ruling on Dual Role as “Ordinary Comments”

    ‘I Will Not Resign,’ Speaker Wetang’ula Dismisses Court Ruling on Dual Role as “Ordinary Comments”

    National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula has dismissed the High Court’s ruling on his dual role as Speaker and Party Leader of Ford Kenya, terming the decision as mere “ordinary comments” in law that are non-binding and have no practical effect.

    Through his legal advisor, Mr. Benson Milimo, Wetang’ula clarified that the court did not order him to relinquish either office and stated that he won’t be resigning as the speaker.

    “I want to assure the nation and the Ford Kenya fraternity that there is absolutely no cause for alarm. What the court did was make comments—what the law terms as ‘obiter dictum’—which are non-binding and have no consequential effect,” Milimo said in a press statement sent to newsrooms on Friday.

    He further emphasized that at no point did the court rule that Wetang’ula should vacate his position as Speaker of the National Assembly or cease being the Party Leader of Ford Kenya.

    Nonetheless, he confirmed that Wetang’ula and his party would appeal the High Court’s decision, reiterating that the ruling has no effect on the Speaker’s status.

    “This means that Dr. Moses Masika Wetang’ula remains the Party Leader of Ford Kenya as well as Speaker of the National Assembly. The Simba Party remains intact, stable, and ready to participate in the 2027 General Election,” he added.

    However, the ruling delivered by Justices John Chigiti, Lawrence Mugambi, and Jairus Ngaah was unequivocal.

    The judges found Wetang’ula in blatant violation of the Constitution, stating that he should have stepped down as Party Leader upon assuming the Speakership.

    “The dual role is unlawful and unconstitutional,” the court ruled. “Once he became Speaker of the National Assembly, he ceased to be the leader of Ford Kenya.”

    The ruling was dealing a blow to Wetang’ula’s controversial October 6, 2022, decision in which he declared Kenya Kwanza as the majority party in Parliament, insisting it had 179 members compared to Azimio la Umoja’s 157.

  • Isolating Wetang’ula: Inside Ruto’s Strategy to Dominate Luhya Leadership

    Isolating Wetang’ula: Inside Ruto’s Strategy to Dominate Luhya Leadership

    When President William Ruto stepped into Embakuli Church of God in Kakamega County, the political tension crackled in the air.

    It was clear that a scheme was brewing to sideline Speaker Moses Wetang’ula from Luhya politics. Ruto’s entourage included powerful leaders, and the atmosphere was charged with ambition and rivalry.

    As rumors of Wetang’ula’s impeachment swirled, political leaders laid bare their ambitions, revealing a fierce struggle for dominance in the region.

    With 2027 on the horizon, every word spoken carries weight as alliances shift and new power plays emerge.Isolating Wetang'ula

    How Ruto Is Isolating Wetang’ula and Rallying Support for Mudavadi

    At the church service, Western Kenyan leaders passionately urged Ruto to retain Musalia Mudavadi as the next Interior Cabinet Secretary. They believe Mudavadi’s experience and political savvy make him the right choice to replace Kithure Kindiki.

    The call for Mudavadi’s elevation reflects the region’s desire for stronger representation in government during this tumultuous time.

    Senator Bonnei Khalwale praised Mudavadi for his leadership skills. He argues that Mudavadi could unite Western Kenya and elevate the region’s status in national politics.

    Meanwhile, Central Organisation of Trade Unions secretary Francis Atwoli emphasized that having leaders like Mudavadi, Wycliffe Oparanya, and Wetang’ula in key positions signals a significant shift as 2027 approaches.

    The Cracks in Luhya Unity

    However, the political landscape is not without cracks. Mudavadi faces growing dissatisfaction among his supporters, who accuse him of sidelining them in favor of alliances with older political figures. Some feel betrayed and are shifting their loyalty to Wetang’ula.

    The recent impeachment of Rigathi Gachagua intensified the struggle. Local MPs, like Christopher Aseka, were clamoring for Mudavadi to ascend to the Deputy President position if Gachagua is ousted.

    Wetang’ula, as Speaker of the National Assembly, is in a powerful position but faces opposition from those close to Mudavadi, who are eager for a shift in allegiances.

    Mudavadi’s Aspirations vs. Wetang’ula’s Authority

    Mudavadi is eager to establish himself as the Luhya kingpin ahead of the 2027 elections. He has begun courting ODM allies, eyeing their support for a fight against Wetang’ula. Yet, Wetang’ula’s camp argues that the Speaker’s position entitles him to a higher status.

    They point out that Wetang’ula was elected and had to fight hard for his role, contrasting with Mudavadi’s seemingly easier path to power.

    As the conflict escalates, bitter rivalries and shifting alliances become increasingly evident. With each passing day, the battle lines grow bolder, and ambitions rise.

    Both leaders are strategizing, taking to the ground, and rallying supporters to their side, but one thing is clear: the political stakes are high, and the future of Luhya leadership hangs in the balance.

    Isolating Wetang’ula vs The Fight for Relevance

    As Mudavadi and Wetang’ula clash, the future of Luhya politics faces uncertainty. Mudavadi believes he can secure his legacy and lift the people of Western Kenya. However, he must navigate through a minefield of past loyalties and division.

    The political scene is dynamic and charged, with the 2027 elections rapidly approaching. In this fierce political environment, every alliance, every speech, and every social media post counts.

    The battle for Luhya dominance is not just a matter of pride; it is about the future direction of the region and its people. Who will emerge victorious from this chaos? Only time will tell as the power struggle heats up.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDvAVbE8Vqw

  • Impeachment: Select Committee Clears Linturi In Fake Fertilizer Scandal

    Impeachment: Select Committee Clears Linturi In Fake Fertilizer Scandal

    Agriculture Cabinet Secretary Mithika Linturi has been saved from impeachment by the special committee of the National Assembly.

    In the 11-member committee that was selected to investigate the charges against the CS, seven voted to quash the motion that was overwhelmingly approved by MPs.

    Even as the committee retired to decide on the fate of the CS, cracks had already emerged in the 11-member committee with insiders claiming it was strategically constituted to save Linturi.

    The team was divided as those from President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance (UDA) who make up the majority had voted to save him while those in the opposition wanted him sent home on grounds that farmers received substandard fertilizer.

    Insiders say that during the report writing stage there was intense lobbying from both sides and under hand-dealings which were cut to try and save Linturi from ouster.

    It is understood that those opposed to his removal were of the opinion that the impeachment motion that was filed by Bumula MP Wamboka Wanami is solely because of his affair with Kitany which played out during the hearings of the proceedings.

    The sources further revealed the focus of the love affair now gone sour during the hearings was to the advantage of Linturi as some of the committee members used the said opportunity to argue in his favour.

    What next?

    The committee chaired by Majority whip and Marsabit woman representative Naomi Waqo that had retreated to Argyle Grand Hotel on Mombasa Road to write its report is expected to table its report today 10 days since it was constituted to allow the House to deliberate on it.

    Had the allegations stood, the National Assembly would have afforded the CS an opportunity to be heard and voted by a resolution of a majority of the 349 MPs in the House, which is 176, to approve the resolution requiring the CS to be dismissed.

    The controversial committee list 

    Even as the committee prepares to table the report dismissing the charges, Mr. Wamboka said that he will be opposing the report when it is tabled in the National Assembly should it exonerate Linturi as it will not be representing the wishes of farmers.

    He raised issues with the composition of the committee saying, it is ironic that the members who voted to reject his impeachment motion were the ones who were investigating the said matter.

    Waqo, Racheal Nyamai (Kitui South), George Murugara (Tharaka), Malulu Injendi (Malava),Kassim Tandaza (Matuga ) and Njeri Maina (Kirinyaga woman representative) who are members of the committee voted against the motion while  Robert Mbui (Kathiani), Tom Kajwang(Ruaraka), Catherine Omanyo(Busia Woman Representative) and Yussuf Farah (Wajor West) were among the 149 members who voted to have Lituri investigated. Ainabkoi MP Samuel Chepkonga’s vote was not captured anywhere.

    While communicating to the House on the composition of the special committee, National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula had said that majority side Kenya Kwanza Alliance, which is dominated by President William Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance (UDA), would have six slots, minority side Azimio la Umoja One Kenya Coalition four and Jubilee Party one slot.

    The list generated by National Assembly Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah (UDA, Kikuyu) had Ms Waqo, the deputy majority whip, Samuel Chepkong’a (UDA, Ainabkoi), George Murugara (UDA, Tharaka), Malulu Injendi (ANC, Malava), Njeri Maina (UDA, Kirinyaga Woman Representative) and Kassim Tandaza (ANC, Matuga).

    The Azimio side had deputy minority leader Robert Mbui (Wiper, Kathiani), Tom Kajwang’ (ODM, Ruaraka), Catherine Omanyo (ODM, Busia Woman Representative) and Yusuf Farah (ODM, Wajir West).

    The Jubilee Party, though a member of Azimio as per the records at the Office of the Registrar of Political Parties (ORPP) but which Mr Wetang’ula had ruled is a political party while allocating it a chief whip position, had Kitui South MP Rachael Nyamai.

    Curiously, all the six members nominated by Mr Ichung’wah to the committee, with the exception of one, voted to oppose the formation of the committee to investigate Mr Linturi.

    They were Ms Waqo, Mr Murugara, Mr Injendi, Ms Maina and Mr Tandaza. Dr Nyamai, who is allied with Kenya Kwanza, also voted to oppose the formation of the committee. Mr Chepkong’a, who was within the chambers, neither vote for or against the motion and did not record his abstention.

    From the Azimio side, only Mr Kajwang’ and Ms Omanyo voted for the establishment of the committee to investigate Mr Linturi.

    Mr Mbui and Mr Farah neither abstained nor voted for or against the motion and it was not clear whether they were in the chambers or not during voting.

    Bribery

    The decision of the select committee comes amid claims of bribery.

    Lawyer Ahmednasir Abdulahi had claimed that the members had been bribed with Ah5 million each to absolve Linturi of the charges and clear him of involvement in the fertilizer scam.

    “5m × 11=acquittal for Hon CS MITHIKA LINTURI by the Parliamentary select committee. ..that is Kenya for you…a FUCKING CHARADE!” The lawyer had posted on Friday.

    Reacting to the latest development, Ahmednasir reiterated the bribery claims and asserted that he knew how it would’ve ended, “I told you my people…5m×11=Hon Mithika Linturi’s ACQUITTAL! I told you my people!”

    On May 2nd 2024, the National Assembly approved a motion that seeks the dismissal of CS Linturi, who is alleged to have approved the procurement and distribution of fake fertilizer by the National Cereals and Produce Board, has failed to exercise public trust and to carry out the duties in a transparent and accountable manner amounting to gross misconduct and gross violation of the Constitution.

    In his closing statement, CS Linturi, through his lawyer Senior Counsel Muthomi Thiankolu, distanced himself from the subsidized fertliser procurement process. “A cabinet secretary is not directly involved in procurement,” SC Thiankolu argued, placing responsibility on the NCPB Managing Director.

    SC Thiankolu also countered that the allegations as outlined in the motion lacked specifics and a clear link between CS Linturi and the alleged wrongdoing.

  • Bungoma To Be Upgraded To City Status

    Bungoma To Be Upgraded To City Status

    National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula has announced plans to facelift Bungoma to city status after Eldoret town.

    Wetangula who also served previously as the county’s senator, said he aims to ensure that Bungoma becomes a city in his lifetime as a speaker and politician.

    The Ford Kenya leader asked County leadership led by Governor Kenneth Lusaka to plan properly for Bungoma to grow to the desired status.

    “We now have Nakuru, Kisumu and Eldoret queuing. Bungoma must be the one behind Eldoret in this region as the next city,” Wetang’ula stated.

    He suggested that roads in the town should be named according to Constituency names, such as Tongaren road.

    Wetang’ula spoke at the Bungoma County Assembly premises during the groundbreaking of debating chambers and the launch of the Konza digital skills laboratory.

    He also criticized the ongoing rehabilitation of Masinde Muliro stadium and called for those sitting on public land to vacate to offer space for stadium expansion.

    Bungoma Governor Kenneth Lusaka echoed Wetang’ula’s sentiments, citing the rehabilitation of Masinde Muliro stadium, Matulo airstrip, street lights installation, and road upgrades as some of the plans for face-lifting the town.

  • Ahmednasir Reveals The Traitors Uhuru Was Referring To In A Cryptic Message

    Ahmednasir Reveals The Traitors Uhuru Was Referring To In A Cryptic Message

    Lawyer Ahmednasir Abdulahi has made a cryptic post about the possible persons whom the former president Uhuru Kenyatta had labeled as traitors recently.

    Ruling out politicians, the lawyer cleverly posted a photo of Chief Justice Martha Koome as a coded message for ‘notorious four’ to mean members of the Supreme Court.

    Screenshot of Ahmednasir’s cryptic tweet.

    “Last week, when President Uhuru called out “Traitors who will not benefit from their trade,” many Kenyans wrongly thought he was referring to politicians. That is why Hon. Murathe quickly issued a clarification. Those who know what happened in September 2022 will tell you that Uhuru’s ire was probably directed at 4 notorious members of one arm of government.” His caption read.

    The Four Supreme Court Judges

    Ahmednasir has been at war with Kenya’s apex court for corruption claims that led to him being banned from appearing before its judges. This was after a sustained campaign over years by the lawyer who painted the court as graft ridden.

    In the suit before the East African Court of Justice, the lawyer has sued Kenyan government seeking to quash a Supreme Court ban against him, and demanding damages of Sh200 million for alleged violation of his right to fair administrative action, Ahmednasir claim four Supreme Court judges were paid to represent vertigo the presidency of Ruto.

    How Supreme Court judges were bribed

    Perhaps the most interesting part of the petition is the lawyer without mentioning the names, gives a blow by blow encounter on how judges were supposedly bribe to influence the 2022 presidential petition judgement.

    Under particulars of incompetence corruption and incompetence by Supreme Court judges, Mr Abdulahi claims that four out of the seven judges were paid between $1.5-2 million (Sh200-266 million) each to overturn the election of William Ruto that had been challenged by Raila Odinga but were however unable to deliver, “4 out of the 7 members of the full bench of the Supreme Court that heard the presidential poll petition by Raila Odinga challenging the results of the August 9, 2022 presidential elections which pitted William Ruto against members of Kenya’s two elite and most powerful political families, accepted bribes of between US$ 1.5 to 2 million each but were unable to influence the outcome of the verdict rendered on 5th September 2022 by which the Supreme Court unanimously upheld William Ruto’s win.” he says in the court document seen by Kenya Insights.

    He goes further to explain how each of the judges were bribed and how the cash was delivered, “Judge A accepted a bribe that was delivered at Judge A’s home in Nairobi by a very powerful politician; Judge B accepted bribes from 3 individuals, the son of a deceased leader, a retired governor and an influential businesswoman; Judge C took a bribe from a member of the National Intelligence Service (NIS) who subsequently left employment of the said service; Judge D accepted a bribe from a member of Parliament. Initially Judge D wanted the bribe to be given to his wife but later changed his mind.” Ahmednasir claimed in the suit.

    Uhuru’s claim of traitors

    While speaking during the Episcopal Ordination of the auxiliary Bishops-elect Simon Peter Kamomoe and Wallace Ng’ang’a Gachihi at St Mary’s Msongari Grounds in Nairobi on Saturday, Mr Kenyatta launched a scathing attack on unnamed individuals, calling them traitors.

    The former head of State, not mincing his words, took on some political leaders whom he termed traitors, lamenting how the political field in Kenya is full of betrayal.

    The fourth president lashed out at the unnamed individuals, warning they would not go far with their betrayal.

    “The nuncio has talked about betrayers in the church but I want to say that I don’t see a lot of betrayals in the church. Betrayal is on the other side (as he pointed to the side occupied by political leaders),” said Mr Kenyatta.

    “To the traitors, I want to tell them that even Judas (Iscariot) betrayed Jesus but he later left the pieces of silver and hanged himself. Everything will all come to an end,” he added.

    National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula, Chief Justice Martha Koome, Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja, Cabinet Secretaries Moses Kuria and Susan Nakhumicha, former CS Monica Juma and a host of Kenya Kwanza and Azimio politicians, including Sifuna, Beatrice Elachi, and Tim Wanyonyi attended the event.

    David Murathe rebuttal

    In a quick rejoinder on Tuesday, Jubilee Party vice chairperson David Murathe clarified that former President Uhuru Kenyatta’s traitor jibe targeted his ex-allies who abandoned him to work with his political friend-turned-rival, President William Ruto.

    Murathe said Mr Kenyatta was targeting people he helped build their political careers only for them to betray him in his hour of need.

    Mr Murathe singled out Public Service CS Kuria, CJ Koome, President Ruto’s National Security Advisor Ms Juma, Speaker Wetang’ula and Governor Sakaja as having rattled Mr Kenyatta, who was in pain over their betrayal despite his immense support in building their careers.

    “Each of these people have a story to tell on how they made it and the support they received. He (Uhuru) went out of his way to build their careers, yet they turned their backs at the slightest opportunity. These are the political traitors he was talking about,” said Mr Murathe.

    On Sakaja, he said it was Kenyatta, who appointed him as the chairman of the defunct The National Alliance (TNA), giving him a platform to launch his political career where he would make his debut in the political scene as nominated MP.

    Similarly, he argued that Mr Kuria benefited from Mr Kenyatta’s support to become Gatundu South MP in the 11th Parliament.

    Mr Kuria’s political journey started when he joined former President Mwai Kibaki’s team through Mr Kenyatta’s Kanu Party.

    Mr Kuria was elected unopposed as the new lawmaker in 2014 on the TNA party following the death of the then Gatundu South MP Jossy Ngugi.

    Mr Murathe said the ex-president was taken aback by how fast former CS Juma shifted allegiance by joining the Ruto camp, “betraying his trust in the process.”

    Without going into details, he said the others have also not been any better, adding that they know what Mr Kenyatta did to each of them but still decided to go against him.

  • Mudavadi, Wetangula camps in silent wars over Luhya kingship

    Mudavadi, Wetangula camps in silent wars over Luhya kingship

    Prime Cabinet Secretary Hon. Musalia Mudavadi struggles to be Luhya’s kingpin ahead of the 2027 general elections amid a looming showdown between him and the National Assembly speaker Moses Wetang’ula in supremacy battles in the Mulembe nation.

    Already, vocal political players in his Vihiga backyard and ANC Party are feeling betrayed and are trooping towards Wetangulas Ford-Kenya. They are accusing Mudavadi of sticking in bed with Luhya elders who served during the reign of former later President Daniel Moi who are misleading him.

    He has held consultative meetings with a section of Luhya leaders in Busia as part of his wider plan to take control of Luhya politics, but the fact that his ANC party is now under the leadership of one sleeping Lamu Governor Issa Timmamy is doing him more harm than good.

    The former VP was hosted by Busia governor Paul Otuoma, a move that angered some of his ANC allies like Sakwa Bunyasi whom Otuoma defeated in last year’s governor race.

    Mudavadi is also targeting many ODM faces in Western Kenya on his side to stage a decisive onslaught against Wetang’ula.

    But constitutionally, the speaker of the national assembly is the third in command after the president and his deputy, though Mudavadi feels that his prime cabinet secretary position makes him the third in command.

    He led another meeting where he prevailed upon Luhya politicians to back him for the presidency in 2032, but it was given a wide berth by politicians allied to Wetangula as he appealed to the region to rally together and guarantee President William Ruto an easy win in 2027.

    Busia is ODMs political stronghold but Mudavadi cut links with ODM to team with Ruto in the run-up to the August 9 general election. It was during the Busia meeting that he was crowned the chairman of the Western council of elders.

    Wetangulalater joined him in the meeting where they also met five elected governors including host Otuoma, Bungoma’s Kenneth Lusaka, Kakamega’s Fernandez Barasa and Wilber Ottichilo from Vihiga but battlelines for the Mulembe nation have already been drawn and are being fanned by their allies.

    The Wetang’ula camp insists the national assembly speaker is the senior most, while Mudavadi camp accuses Wetang’ula of not fearing to be impartial as the speaker of the national assembly by playing active politics and also not relinquishing his seat as Ford-K leader the way the PCS did by resigning as Amani ANC party leader.

    The speaker’s allies also argue that Mudavadi was nominated to his position through Ruto’s Executive Order while Wetang’ula had been first elected as Bungoma senator and was still brave enough to resign to run for the national assembly speaker seat, which he eventually won against Kenneth Marende.

    Mudavadi got his current position on a silver platter while Wetang’ula struggled and also made sure his successor Wafula Wakoli triumphed in the subsequent by-election.

    The former ANC leader has not run for any elective position since 2013, when he came a distant third in the presidential election. He also has not held any elective post since 2002, when he served as vice president for two only months.

  • What President Uhuru Told OKA Leaders In State House Meeting

    What President Uhuru Told OKA Leaders In State House Meeting

    President Uhuru Kenyatta reportedly met One Kenya Alliance on Saturday October 30, 2021 in a bid to convince them into supporting ODM leader Raila Odinga in the 2022 polls.

    The Head of State met ANC party leader Musalia Mudavadi, Wiper Party leader Kalonzo Musyoka and Bungoma senator Moses Wetangula. Baringo senator Gideon Moi and ex-Lugari MP Cyrus Jirongo, who are also members of the OKA team, were not present at the meeting.

    According to reports by a local daily, the President whipped the OKA principals to shelve their presidential bids in favour of the former prime minister.

    The President is said to have scorned the leaders, telling them that he was not impressed by their actions, that he opined could scuttle his plans for the future of the country.

    The President also posited that the continued parallel campaigns by the OKA team was causing confusion among the electorate and specifically in the bastions of the now defunct NASA coalition.

    Uhuru is said to have put ANC party leader on the spot for his numerous remarks that insinuated that the country’s economy is increasingly declining under the President’s watch.

    Speaking on the meeting, ANC Deputy party leader Ayub Savula stated that the President was only appealing to the OKA leaders to support Raila and not compelling them for the same.

    “The President is meeting the OKA leaders at State House because these are people who represent political parties, they have to consult. There is an issue of convincing and as Uhuru said before, opposition leaders have to unite because they have a common enemy but is just an appeal, he cannot force them to support a particular person,” he said.

  • Outsiders Or Insiders: ANC Party Dangling Loyalties Of Malala And Osotsi

    Outsiders Or Insiders: ANC Party Dangling Loyalties Of Malala And Osotsi

    Musalia Mudavadi’s ANC Party and Senator Moses Wetangula’s Ford Kenya Party have been planning for political merger in since early last year.

    A move the two opposition parties termed as Luhya Unity and a political strategy to unify the vote-rich Western region in their political basket.

    According Mudavadi, this is to enhance peaceful coexistence and have a western votes lock up to give the region a strong bargaining power in National politics and future elections.

    But the merger has been delayed what ANC handlers called influence from ‘Outsiders’ through those who belong to the respective parties.

    Or this was just a rushed political strategy that was to cover the shame, mess and confusion around Raila Odinga’s swearing in and talks of NASA collapsing.

    Not forgetting, the merger, if rushed and miscalculated, will have no strong Political viability in the region or the Nation.

    The constantly and continuous influence of ODMs Raila Odinga and Government influence through DP Ruto in Western Kenya has widened the rift amongst local leaders.

    Raila who says that he is the 13th grand child of Nabongo-Mumia Of the larger Wanga kingdom has insisted that western leaders should not to leave him out of the negotiations.

    Raila enjoyed a massive support from Western region in 2007, 2013 and 2017.

    Railas deep influence is a biggest threat to the ANC-Ford Kenya merger and it’s political viability.

    Kakamega Senator Cleophas Malala and nominated MP Godfrey Osotsi have come out as two ANC members who not only support but also strongly protects ODM’s political agenda in the region.

    Also in this mess of misplaced loyalties line is Vihiga Senator George Khaniri who is a staunch supporter of Raila.

    Senator Malala and The expelled ANC SG Osotsi told a local press that ANC handlers want them out of the party because of their close association with ODM and Raila’s agenda.

    Osotsi is now claiming that his “Organized” expulsion from ANC wasn’t because of the allegations of loss of Party Funds.

    The Two says their party and Party leader is fighting them because they are supporting Raila and his party’s principles.

    Senator Malala and Osotsi loyalties are dangling. They clearly don’t belong to Mudavadi neither are they admitting to belong to Raila.

    They’re are still supporting NASA and it’s leader at the expense of their party.

    NASA is a political coalition that legally exists But has been rendered irrelevant its cause overtaken by events.

    This is not the first time Malala’s loyalty has been questioned.

    Late Last year, Wanga Council of Elders declared the first term senator A Luo by Birth and origin.

    The Chairperson of the Council of Elder Peter Nabongo, told the writer of this site that Malala can never be allowed to sign a deal on behalf of the Luhya community.

    Peter Nabongo said Malala’s father came from Nyanza and settled In western.

    “Malala’s father was allowed to marry from around this region, that doesn’t qualify him as a Luhya” Said Peter Nabongo.

    Osotsi on the other side, has been allegedly withdrawing ANC funds for his own personal business and agenda.

    The ANC self proclaimed founder has never attended ANC meetings nor stepped his foot in ANC offices for more than a Year now.

    Barrack Muluka ANC secretary general and Ford Kenya’s Eseli Simiyu have confirmed the merger plans saying that the learnt that their effort had been infiltrated by outsiders from both sides.

    Osotsi and Malala have the same political feathers as Boni Khalwale.

    Their loyalty is swayed by money and Other political related incentives.

    These self proclaimed Western political youths have clearly shown their split personalities In matters leadership, development, public politics and most important, Democracy in their party politics.

    With that out and aside, i pose a question to you our esteemed readers;

    Are these two a generational change of politics or they are a practical example and a case study of the misplaced and displaced Political loyalties of the Luhya Nation?