Tag: Kenya Maritime Authority (KMA)

  • Maritime Authority Boss Nyarandi Faces Revolt From Staff Just Two Months After Appointment

    Maritime Authority Boss Nyarandi Faces Revolt From Staff Just Two Months After Appointment

    The honeymoon period is over for Justus Omae Nyarandi, the newly appointed Director General of the Kenya Maritime Authority (KMA), as he faces mounting resistance from senior staff and management just two months into his tenure.

    Nyarandi, who was appointed on July 10, 2025, by Mining and Blue Economy Cabinet Secretary Hassan Ali Joho, has found himself at the center of a brewing crisis that has seen top managers openly question his leadership style and hiring practices.

    Sources within the maritime authority suggest that all is not well at the marine regulatory body, with tensions escalating since his controversial appointment.

    The appointment itself has come under scrutiny, with industry insiders questioning the process that led to Nyarandi’s selection.

    Cabinet Secretary Joho, who officially took office in August 2024, exercised his powers under Section 11(1) of the Kenya Maritime Authority Act 2006, making the appointment on the board of directors’ recommendations for a three-year term.

    However, critics argue that the decision was influenced more by personal relationships than professional merit.

    The controversy deepened when allegations surfaced that Nyarandi’s appointment was primarily based on his relationship with CS Joho, dating back to his time at the Kenya Ports Authority where he served as General Manager for Corporate Services.

    Sources claim that Nyarandi was considered a family friend of Joho, particularly during their involvement in various business deals during that period.

    What has particularly irked staff and board members is Nyarandi’s immediate hiring spree upon assuming office.

    Before he had fully settled into his role, the new Director General had already employed four staff members under what sources describe as “very questionable circumstances.”

    When questioned about these appointments, Nyarandi has defended his actions by stating that he is helping President William Ruto address the country’s unemployment crisis.

    However, this explanation has raised eyebrows, particularly given that the new hires reportedly come predominantly from his Gusii ethnic community.

    The internal resistance to Nyarandi’s leadership has been most vocal among senior management, particularly Director of Maritime Safety Julius Koech and Isaiah Nakoru.

    Both seasoned maritime professionals have previously acted as Director General in interim capacities, bringing considerable experience and institutional knowledge to their roles.

    Staff members have reportedly described Koech as humble and professional, with some referring to him as the “de facto DG” due to his competence and leadership qualities.

    The comparison between Nyarandi’s academic qualifications and those of his senior managers has become another point of contention within the authority.

    While Nyarandi holds an MBA in Strategic Management from the University of Nairobi and is both a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Public Secretary, critics argue that his credentials pale in comparison to the technical maritime expertise possessed by colleagues like Engineer Koech.

    This academic and professional disparity has created tension, particularly given Nyarandi’s previous role as Executive Secretary of the Northern Corridor Transit and Transport Coordination Authority.

    Industry observers suggest that while this position provided valuable experience in regional transport coordination, it may not have adequately prepared him for the technical complexities of maritime safety and regulatory oversight that define KMA’s mandate.

    The current board of directors, led by Chairman Mohammed Kolosh, includes Principal Secretary Aden Millah, Dr. Lilian Apadet Osamong, Annistain Mogaka, Rashid Hamid Ahmed, Ezekiel Kibo, and Ali Abdalla Mondo.

    Sources suggest that some board members were pressured into supporting the appointment, raising questions about the independence of the selection process.

    The timing of this internal revolt is particularly challenging for KMA, which has historically struggled with leadership stability.

    The authority has experienced a high turnover of executives since the 2005 departure of founding Director General Nancy Karigithu.

    This pattern of leadership instability has undermined the organization’s ability to provide consistent oversight of Kenya’s maritime sector.

    Adding to the challenges facing Nyarandi are the broader issues plaguing the maritime sector, including concerns about corruption, safety standards, and recruitment practices.

    The authority is currently advertising 38 job vacancies across multiple departments, with applications closing on October 6, 2025.

    However, the ongoing internal tensions may complicate efforts to attract and retain quality personnel.

    As Kenya seeks to develop its blue economy and enhance its position as a regional maritime hub, the stability and competence of its regulatory authorities become crucial.

    For Nyarandi, the challenge now lies in rebuilding trust within the organization while demonstrating that he can effectively lead Kenya’s premier maritime regulatory body.

    His success or failure in navigating these early challenges will likely determine not only his tenure but also KMA’s ability to fulfill its critical role in overseeing the country’s maritime sector.

    The revolt within KMA serves as a reminder that appointments to technical leadership positions require not just political backing but also the confidence and respect of the professional teams tasked with implementing critical regulatory functions.

    As the situation continues to unfold, stakeholders across Kenya’s maritime industry will be watching closely to see whether this leadership crisis can be resolved or if it will further undermine the authority’s effectiveness.

  • Kenya Maritime Authority Announces Job Vacancies Across Multiple Departments

    Kenya Maritime Authority Announces Job Vacancies Across Multiple Departments

    The Kenya Maritime Authority (KMA) has announced a fresh round of job vacancies as it seeks to strengthen its workforce and enhance efficiency in the regulation and management of maritime affairs.

    In a re-advertisement notice, the state corporation invited applications from highly competent and proactive individuals to fill 20 different positions, ranging from senior officers to support staff.

    Some of the key roles include Senior Maritime Transport Logistics Training Officer, Senior Ports and Shipping Services Officer, Legal Officers, Surveyors, Marine Environment Protection Officer, and Maritime Labour Officer. Support positions such as ICT Assistant, Supply Chain Management Assistant, Drivers, and Office Assistants are also open.

    In a separate advertisement, KMA also declared vacancies for two senior management positions: Assistant Director, Ports and Shipping Services, and Assistant Director, Human Resource and Administration.

    Applicants are required to submit detailed applications, including curriculum vitae, academic and professional certificates, national identification documents, and other supporting materials.

    Each applicant must clearly indicate the position and reference number on their cover letter.

    Applications can be submitted through three channels:

    • Hard copies addressed to the Director General, Kenya Maritime Authority.
    • Online applications in PDF format to the designated recruitment emails.
    • Post applications sent to the Chairman, Board of Directors, Kenya Maritime Authority, at KMA Towers in Mombasa.

    The deadline for submission is Monday, October 6, 2025, at 5:00 pm.

    KMA emphasized that canvassing will lead to automatic disqualification and that successful candidates will be required to present clearance certificates from relevant government agencies, including the Kenya Revenue Authority, Higher Education Loans Board, Credit Reference Bureau, and the Directorate of Criminal Investigations.

    The Authority reaffirmed its commitment to equal opportunity employment, encouraging women and persons with disabilities to apply. Only shortlisted candidates will be contacted.

  • Sh800 Million Question: How KMA Officials Inflated Building Contract by 80% in Backdoor Deals

    Sh800 Million Question: How KMA Officials Inflated Building Contract by 80% in Backdoor Deals

    The stench of corruption hangs heavy over the gleaming towers of the Kenya Maritime Authority headquarters in Mombasa, where what should have been a Sh1 billion project mysteriously ballooned to Sh1.8 billion—an astronomical 80% increase that has left taxpayers footing an extra Sh800 million bill.

    Court documents and testimonies emerging from the ongoing graft case paint a disturbing picture of systematic tender manipulation, backdoor dealings, and brazen disregard for procurement laws that allowed connected contractors to feast on public funds while officials looked the other way.

    ## The Paper Trail of Plunder

    The story begins in 2012 when KMA, then housed within Kenya Ports Authority premises, proposed constructing its own headquarters. What started as a modest Sh1 billion budget in 2016/2017 financial estimates underwent a suspicious transformation that would make even seasoned corruption watchers gasp.

    First, the budget was quietly revised upward to Sh1.2 billion. Then, in a move that defies logical explanation, former acting director-general Cosmas Cherop and his procurement team awarded the contract to Epco Builders Ltd for a staggering Sh1.8 billion in January 2017.

    The question that begs an answer: How does a construction project’s cost increase by 80% without any significant changes to scope or design specifications?

    ## The Smoking Gun: Adjusted Tender Sums

    Court testimony reveals the modus operandi of this elaborate scheme. Officials systematically “adjusted” tender sums on bid documents, effectively rigging the process in favor of predetermined winners.

    Former procurement manager Edwin Momanyi didn’t just recommend Epco Builders Ltd for the main construction contract—he specifically endorsed the “adjusted sum” of Sh1.8 billion, according to prosecution evidence. This wasn’t an oversight or bureaucratic error; it was a calculated decision to inflate costs.

    The corruption web extended beyond the main contract. Master Power Systems received electrical works worth Sh224.2 million, while Plumbing Systems Ltd secured Sh79.8 million for plumbing works—all at “adjusted sums” that prosecutors allege violated procurement laws.

    ## The Tender Rigging Machine

    The sophistication of this scheme becomes apparent when examining the roles of various officials:

    **Bakari Mwakuyu and Juma Ali** stand accused of the technical work—actually amending tender amounts on bid documents for multiple companies, including Epco Builders Ltd, Parbat Siyani Construction, and China Zhongxing Construction Company.

    More damning, they allegedly declared Epco Builders Ltd as a “responsive bidder” despite the company failing to meet basic requirements outlined in clause 3.3 of the bidding instructions. This suggests the fix was in from the start.

    **Jemimah Musinga and Francis Okello** allegedly manipulated tender sums for electrical works, adjusting figures for Master Power Systems Ltd, Mehta Electrical Ltd, and Tudor Engineering Ltd to ensure predetermined outcomes.

    Even supposed “independent experts”—**Peter Kimani, Jared Biwott, and Denis Ngenoh**—were allegedly co-opted into the scheme, adjusting tender documents to favor specific contractors.

    ## The Money Trail and Missing Accountability

    Perhaps most telling is the testimony of Edwin Were, KMA’s former head of finance, who revealed that Epco Builders Ltd immediately raised an “advance payment invoice” upon signing the contract. This suggests the contractors were eager to secure upfront payments—a common feature in corruption schemes where kickbacks need to be distributed quickly.

    Were’s claim that he was “not involved in the procurement process” and only handled payments after receiving “necessary supporting documents” raises uncomfortable questions about willful blindness within KMA’s financial management structure.

    ## Questions That Demand Answers

    The KMA case exposes systemic vulnerabilities in Kenya’s public procurement system:

    1. **How did a Sh1 billion project become Sh1.8 billion without proper justification or public scrutiny?**

    2. **What role did political influence play in ensuring Epco Builders Ltd received preferential treatment despite not meeting bidding requirements?**

    3. **Where are the internal audit reports that should have flagged these irregularities before contracts were signed?**

    4. **How many other government projects have been similarly inflated through “adjusted tender sums”?**

    ## The Broader Implications

    This case represents more than just another corruption scandal—it’s a blueprint for how procurement processes can be systematically subverted. The fact that multiple officials across different departments coordinated to manipulate tender documents suggests institutional capture rather than isolated incidents of graft.

    The Sh800 million cost escalation at KMA likely represents just the tip of the iceberg. If similar “adjustments” are happening across government projects, taxpayers could be losing billions annually to inflated contracts and rigged tenders.

    ## Justice Delayed?

    While the case against Cherop and his co-accused continues in Mombasa courts, with the next hearing scheduled for October 9, the damage to public finances has already been done. The KMA headquarters stands as a monument to procurement fraud, its gleaming facade hiding the corrupt dealings that inflated its true cost by hundreds of millions.

    For ordinary Kenyans struggling with the high cost of living, the KMA scandal serves as a painful reminder of how corruption diverts resources meant for public benefit into private pockets. The Sh800 million lost to inflated contracts could have funded numerous development projects or social programs.

  • Kenya Maritime Authority Official Arrested Over Sh40M Insurance Tender Fraud

    Kenya Maritime Authority Official Arrested Over Sh40M Insurance Tender Fraud

    The official was arrested in an operation which also targeted two insurance brokers believed to have participated in the insurance scam.

    EACC said the official was apprehended in Naivasha where he had attended training and escorted to EACC Integrity Centre Offices in Nairobi.

    Confirming the operation, EACC Spokesperson Eric Ngumbi revealed that Henry Mwasaru, the Assistant Director and Head of Human Resources and Administration at the Kenya Maritime Authority (KMA) is accused of being involved in the award of a medical insurance tender in contravention of the procurement law and regulations.

    Mwasaru was taken into custody on Tuesday during a meticulously coordinated operation.

    The crackdown also targeted two insurance brokers suspected of facilitating the fraudulent scheme. Investigators allege that Mwasaru collaborated with Bevaline Lundu, KMA’s Head of Supply Chain Management, to manipulate the tender process and unlawfully award the contract to a favoured insurance agency in violation of procurement laws.

    After the search operation in their respective residential premises and homes, the three were taken to EACC Offices in Nairobi and Mombasa were they were interviewed and recorded statements.

    They were later released pending finalisation of the probe.

    EACC said the operation, which was pursuant to court orders, yielded valuable evidentiary material that will support the ongoing investigations.

    Investigations commenced after the Commission, through its Lower Coast Regional Office in Mombasa, received a complaint on September 30, 2024, regarding an awarded insurance tender.

    The Commission is intensifying its focus on tenders for staff medical insurance in public institutions, which are increasingly believed to be the channel used as a conduit for embezzlement of public funds.

    “The outcome of the ongoing investigation will inform the next course of action, which may include prosecution and recovery of any public funds fraudulently paid from public coffers,” Ngumbi said.

  • MPs Probe KMA

    MPs Probe KMA

    The management of the Kenya Maritime Authority (KMA) has been put on the spot over a series of queries in procurement processes between the 2018–2019 and 2020–2021 financial years.

    Appearing on Wednesday for the second consecutive day before the National Assembly Public Investments Committee on Commercial Affairs and Energy, KMA Managing Director, Engineer Martin Munga, was interrogated over queries raised by the office of the Auditor General, during the years under review.

    Among the queries probed by the Committee Chaired by Pokot South Member of Parliament (MP), David Pkosing, were unconfirmed Revenues from Non-Exchange Transactions.

    According to the Auditor General, monthly and annual reports on imports and export fees, were not provided for audit, even though separate records indicated that the Authority had collected merchant shopping levies totaling Sh1.6 million and a Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) collection cost of Sh38.7 million.

    “As a result, the accuracy and competence of the revenue arising from the levies of Sh 1.7 million, could not be confirmed,” reads the Auditor General Report in part.

    During the probe, Mr. Munga, who has been in his position for only six (6) weeks, was cautioned that the nondisclosure of information sought by the Committee would have implications on the culpability of KMA officials when the Committee retreats to draft its Report.

    “This Committee enjoys powers equivalent to those of a High Court, and our final Report is actionable by relevant authorities,” said Pkosing.

    KMA Headquarters

    On Tuesday, the Committee also visited KMA Headquarters in Mombasa to inspect the administration complex, whose construction has some of the audit queries under the Committee’s probe.

    Members of the committee, led by Eldas MP Adan Keynan, identified cost variations totaling approximately Ksh500 million, a figure they deemed substantial.

    KMA Director General Martin Munga and other key witnesses were also questioned on the increased cost, which was originally budgeted at Ksh1.7 billion but exceeded over Ksh2 billion.

    “We are here to examine the books of KMA, which is housed here and to look at queries that were raised by the Auditor General and specifically about this building that we are in which is the headquarters of KMA,” said Pkosing.

    “The Office of the Auditor General raised fundamental issues relating to variations. This building was designed to cost about Sh1.7B but eventually it has exceeded Sh2B. The question is what justification the bidders or contractors have in the variations,” he added.

    Pkosing stressed the committee’s commitment to evaluating the value of money expended on behalf of taxpayers.

    “We learned that some of the costs were associated with stabilizing the building to accommodate its 17 floors, including piling, soil stabilization, foundation protection, and other factors,” stated Pkosing.

    However, the newly appointed KMA boss said the Sh500 million variation has yet to be disbursed to the contractor and is pending further discussions with the Ministry of Public Works.

    The MPs hinted at the possibility of summoning former KMA Director General if he will be implicated in the ongoing investigations.