Tag: Justin Muturi

  • Justin Muturi Is Politically Weightless, Ruto Can Afford Him But Doesn’t Need Him

    Justin Muturi Is Politically Weightless, Ruto Can Afford Him But Doesn’t Need Him

    Former Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi is back in the headlines for all the wrong reasons. After denying reports that he met emissaries from President William Ruto to discuss a political reunion, Muturi finds himself exposed as a politician struggling to remain relevant.

    While he dismisses the reports as fake, observers say his denials do little to change the perception that he’s a lightweight politician chasing proximity to power. Ruto doesn’t need him, and even if he wanted him, Muturi’s political value has long evaporated.

    Justin Muturi’s political weight has always depended on who holds power—never on his own strength. Today, he is merely clinging to visibility by denying meetings that never happened. Ruto doesn’t need him, and the opposition barely notices him. In the ruthless world of Kenyan politics, Muturi is a name from yesterday—not a voice of tomorrow. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Why President Ruto’s Men Have No Reason to Meet Justin Muturi

    Justin Muturi’s denial of having met emissaries from President Ruto wasn’t necessary. No one in the president’s camp has any reason to chase him. His value in national politics is negligible. Muturi represents a breed of politicians who rode on the backs of stronger men and now struggle to stand on their own.

    Muturi claimed on Sunday that the reports were “fake news” meant to create division within the opposition. Yet, his statement revealed more about his insecurity than his conviction. For a man whose career has been powered by proximity to power rather than political muscle, his fear of being forgotten is justified.

    Ruto’s inner circle has met Uhuru Kenyatta, Raila Odinga, and Gideon Moi—all with political structures, constituencies, and influence. Muturi, on the other hand, brings nothing to the table. His Democratic Party (DP) can’t even shake the roots of the Democratic Congress Party (DCP) in his own Mbeere constituency. Why would Ruto spend political capital chasing a man who cannot even command his backyard?

    Muturi’s Political Career Is Built On Borrowed Relevance

    Muturi’s career reads like a man who has walked through every corridor of power but never left his mark. He first entered Parliament through a by-election in 1999 under KANU and managed to keep the Siakago seat in 2002. When KANU’s grip faded, so did Muturi’s influence. He became the Opposition Chief Whip and chaired the Public Investments Committee—roles that gave him visibility but no lasting political network.

    In 2007, voters sent him home. He resurfaced in 2013 under The National Alliance (TNA), Uhuru Kenyatta’s party, but again lost his Mbeere North bid. Uhuru later rescued him by making him Speaker of the National Assembly, not because Muturi commanded national respect, but because he was loyal and safe.

    From 2013 to 2022, Muturi presided over Parliament with bias and arrogance. His tenure as speaker was defined by open partisanship, leaning heavily toward the Jubilee government and alienating opposition MPs. His rulings often reeked of political favoritism, cementing his image as one of the most unprofessional Speakers in Kenya’s history.

    When his political usefulness ended, Uhuru’s system parked him in the Attorney General’s office in 2022, and later, Ruto recycled him into the Ministry of Public Service in 2024—a soft landing for a man too lightweight for real political combat.

    Justin Muturi’s denial only exposes his fading relevance. Ruto doesn’t need him. The opposition barely notices him. Kenya has moved on, leaving Muturi clinging to shadows of lost influence. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Ruto Doesn’t Need Muturi’s Empty Shell

    If there’s one thing President Ruto understands, it’s the politics of value. Ruto engages those who can deliver constituencies, not commentary. He knows Muturi cannot sway the Embu vote, control Mount Kenya politics, or even rally local MCAs. His DP party is dormant, existing only on paper and press statements.

    Muturi’s denial of meeting Ruto’s allies isn’t noble—it’s self-preservation. He wants to look like a man being courted, even when no one is knocking. Hanging onto Ruto’s name keeps him relevant in the opposition, where he is fast fading. Within the Azimio fold, he’s barely noticed. His name doesn’t appear in strategy meetings, and his opinions carry no weight.

    While Ruto is meeting heavyweights like Raila, Kalonzo, and Gideon Moi to shape Kenya’s political future, Muturi is issuing denials about imaginary meetings. That contrast alone explains his current irrelevance. The president’s team has bigger fish to fry, and Muturi simply isn’t one of them.

    A Man Following the Big Boys

    Muturi’s pattern is predictable: attach himself to power, serve loyally until the tide shifts, then declare independence and seek new alliances. It worked when KANU collapsed. It worked again under TNA. It worked once more when Ruto came calling. But this time, there is no tide left to ride.

    He has become a passenger in Kenya’s political train—always present but never steering the engine.

    For a man who once occupied the powerful Speaker’s chair, it’s a tragic descent into irrelevance. He is now reduced to chasing headlines about alleged meetings with Ruto’s allies to stay visible. But Ruto doesn’t need to meet Muturi. He already owns the ground Muturi once stood on.

    In a world of political heavyweights, Muturi is just a lightweight—a man who once sat at the table but now stands outside, hoping someone remembers his name.

  • Rigathi, Muturi in Trouble as State Invokes Official Secrets Act to Silence Dissenting Former Officials

    Rigathi, Muturi in Trouble as State Invokes Official Secrets Act to Silence Dissenting Former Officials

    The Kenyan government has invoked the Official Secrets Act in what critics describe as a calculated move to silence dissenting former government officials, particularly targeting former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and former Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi.

    Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen, appearing before the National Assembly’s Administration and Internal Affairs Committee on Tuesday, issued a stern warning that public officials who disclose classified government information risk prosecution under the Official Secrets Act.

    “There are those who are older but do not abide by the Act,” Murkomen stated, adding that “there are attendant consequences to this.”

    The CS emphasized that the oath of secrecy taken by public officers prohibits them from disclosing classified information, suggesting that doing so “says something about the person you have entrusted with a public office.”

    Under Sections 3 and 20 of the Official Secrets Act, unauthorized disclosure of government information can lead to imprisonment for up to 14 years without the option of a fine.

    The law specifically targets individuals who possess or control information entrusted to them in confidence by government officials and subsequently disclose it.

    Constitutional Concerns Raised

    The move has drawn sharp criticism from legal experts and the targeted former officials themselves.

    Former CS Justin Muturi and lawyers David Ochami and Anthony Musau have argued that such application of the Act violates the Constitution.

    “All I did was respond to President Ruto, who was my coalition partner within the Kenya Kwanza alliance, because he had exposed me to the public. In any case, I cannot respond to Murkomen because he is not at my level,” Muturi stated in response to the threat.

    Legal expert David Ochami noted that contrary to popular belief, the Official Secrets Act does not offer blanket protection to all classified information.

    “Despite the Act, past and present officials cannot be penalised for disclosures made in the public interest, especially if the information prevents crimes or wrongdoing by the State,” he explained.

    Anthony Musau further criticized the application of the Act as being “at odds with the spirit of a democratic society,” pointing out that “the necessary safeguards to prevent abuse by an overzealous regime are lacking.”

    Background of Dissent

    The government’s invocation of the Act follows public statements by both Gachagua and Muturi alleging corruption and human rights abuses within the Kenya Kwanza administration.

    Muturi previously claimed that the National Intelligence Service (NIS) abducted his son and held him incommunicado, forcing him to seek President William Ruto’s intervention.

    He also alleged being coerced by President Ruto into signing a multi-billion shilling tree-planting deal with the Russian government at a foreign airport, and accused the President of using Indian conglomerate Adani to capture operations at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport.

    Gachagua, for his part, has publicly accused President Ruto of engaging in questionable business dealings with leaders of Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), a militia group blamed for fueling instability in that country.

    Constitutional Protections

    Legal experts emphasize that freedom of expression is enshrined in Kenya’s Bill of Rights. Article 24 of the Constitution outlines specific conditions under which such rights may be limited, requiring that any limitations must be “reasonable and justifiable in a democratic society.”

    Article 33 only allows for curbs on free expression in cases involving incitement to violence, hate speech, or propaganda for war—not to shield government officials or actions from public scrutiny.

    Musau summarized the legal contradiction, stating, “The Constitution is the supreme law and binds all persons, including Mr. Murkomen, as well as all State organs at both levels of government.”

    As this situation develops, many observers are watching closely to see whether the government will follow through on its threats of prosecution, potentially setting up a significant constitutional test case on the limits of state secrecy versus freedom of expression in Kenya’s democracy.

  • Murkomen’s Gag Order? Interior CS Is Using the Secrets Act to Silence Gachagua and Muturi

    Murkomen’s Gag Order? Interior CS Is Using the Secrets Act to Silence Gachagua and Muturi

    A fresh storm is brewing in Kenya’s political landscape, and at its center is Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen.

    He has invoked the rarely used Official Secrets Act, a move widely seen as an attempt to silence Gachagua and Muturi, two of the Kenya Kwanza administration’s most vocal critics.

    Former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and former Attorney General-turned-Public Service CS Justin Muturi have increasingly spoken out against alleged corruption and human rights abuses under President William Ruto’s government.

    Now, Murkomen’s stern warning signals a deepening crackdown on whistleblowers within government ranks.

    Murkomen’s Gag Order? Interior CS Is Using the Secrets Act to Silence Gachagua and Muturi
    Former DP Gachagua has taken a firm stand against what he calls the “capture of state institutions” by a shadowy elite. He has also accused the Ruto administration of orchestrating politically motivated arrests and ignoring the rule of law. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Murkomen Wields the Secrets Act Against Dissent

    Interior CS Kipchumba Murkomen shocked lawmakers and the public alike when he told the National Assembly’s Administration and Internal Affairs Committee that government officials who leak classified information would face severe consequences under the Official Secrets Act.

    Murkomen’s comments were not made in a vacuum. They came after Saku MP Dida Rasso raised concerns over recent disclosures made by Gachagua and Muturi.

    These disclosures include explosive claims ranging from enforced disappearances to coercive diplomacy and mega-corruption deals allegedly backed by top government figures. Murkomen reminded Parliament that all public officers take an oath of secrecy.

    “There are those who are older but do not abide by the Act,” he said in a thinly veiled jab at Muturi and Gachagua. “There are attendant consequences to this.” He insisted that leaking classified information reflects poorly on any person entrusted with public office.

    He cited Section 3 and Section 20 of the Official Secrets Act, which provides for up to 14 years in prison for unauthorized disclosure of government information.

    These remarks sparked immediate backlash from legal experts and Muturi himself, who argued that the move contravenes constitutional freedoms.

    Yet, Murkomen stood his ground, arguing that trust and confidentiality are key to public service, and those who break this trust deserve punishment.

    The CS appears determined to use Gachagua and Muturi—once key figures in the ruling Kenya Kwanza alliance but now seen as threats to Ruto’s inner circle—as examples.

    Muturi and Gachagua: From Power Brokers to Government Critics

    Justin Muturi and Rigathi Gachagua were once close allies of President Ruto. Today, they are among his loudest critics. Their fall from grace appears to coincide with their refusal to remain silent about the inner workings of government.

    Muturi, who previously served as the Attorney General and Public Service Cabinet Secretary, has accused the National Intelligence Service (NIS) of abducting his son. He said his son was held incommunicado without charge—an act he labelled “state-sanctioned terrorism.”

    He also revealed that President Ruto forced him to sign a multi-billion-shilling tree-planting deal with the Russian government while at a foreign airport, raising serious questions about transparency and accountability.

    On his part, Gachagua has taken a firm stand against what he calls the “capture of state institutions” by a shadowy elite. He has also accused the Ruto administration of orchestrating politically motivated arrests and ignoring the rule of law.

    By targeting these two figures, Murkomen appears to be enforcing political discipline within the ruling alliance.

    Justin Muturi [Photo: Courtesy]

    Critics Warn of a Return to Authoritarianism

    The decision to lean on the Official Secrets Act—a law dating back to colonial-era Kenya—has alarmed many civil society groups and legal experts.

    Lawyers David Ochami and Anthony Musau have strongly condemned the tactic, arguing that it undermines the 2010 Constitution’s guarantees of freedom of expression and the right to access information.

    “The law is being misused to silence dissent and punish transparency,” said Musau. “We are witnessing the shrinking of democratic space, right before our eyes.”

    The Constitution, they argue, protects whistleblowers who expose corruption, abuse of power, or gross misconduct.

    By invoking a 14-year prison sentence for disclosing public interest information, Murkomen is not protecting state secrets—he is protecting those in power.

    Muturi himself has been defiant, telling reporters, “I will not be intimidated. I served this country with integrity, and I will not allow threats to silence the truth.”

    Gachagua, too, has remained outspoken, recently dropping a string of damning allegations against the Ruto administration during a night interview that stirred political debate across the country.

  • Kenyans on X Slam Attention-Seeking Muturi Over Bizarre Easter ‘Obituary’ Poster

    Kenyans on X Slam Attention-Seeking Muturi Over Bizarre Easter ‘Obituary’ Poster

    Attention-seeking Muturi triggered a storm of criticism after posting an Easter message on X (formerly Twitter) on April 18.

    Instead of spreading cheer, the former Public Service Cabinet Secretary drew outrage with a graphic showing himself emerging from clouds beside a cross—an image many mistook for an obituary.

    Kenyans on X didn’t hold back. They slammed the post as tone-deaf, egotistical, and disturbing.

    What Muturi likely meant as a spiritual gesture quickly became a public relations disaster, fuelled by mockery, satire, and brutal honesty from netizens who saw right through the spectacle.

    Attention-Seeking Muturi Roasted for ‘Obituary’ Easter Poster

    Kenyans on X did not hold back when Justin Muturi’s Easter poster went live. The image, which showed him appearing to emerge from the clouds beside a glowing cross, immediately struck the wrong chord.

    Users slammed the former Cabinet Secretary, calling the graphic eerie, confusing, and offensive. Many thought it was an obituary.

    Others assumed it was a hacked or parody account. The Easter message, printed in small text, was barely noticed under the dramatic image.

    “The communications manager and the graphics designer need to be off the payroll like yesterday,” one user wrote bluntly.

    Poor Design, Poor Judgment

    One comment summed up the general sentiment: “Had to read again and again. Thought this was bad news.” Others flooded the post with sarcastic condolence messages, mocking what they saw as Muturi’s desperation for attention.

    While some users offered constructive feedback—like using warm yellows, florals, or celebratory fonts—most couldn’t ignore what they felt was an attempt to stay relevant through shock value.

    Muturi’s decision to include the national Coat of Arms, despite no longer holding public office, only added fuel to the fire. Users questioned whether he still thought of himself as a state official, especially after being fired.

    Muturi’s Recent Attacks on Ruto Add Context

    Justin Muturi’s fall from grace hasn’t gone quietly. Since being fired by President William Ruto and replaced by Geoffrey Ruku, Muturi has launched consistent attacks on the administration.

    He accused Ruto of trying to force him into signing a shady Ksh129 billion deal with Russian investors—while still at the airport.

    The funds were meant for a tree-planting project, but Muturi claimed he was never given time to review the documents.

    Calling Ruto’s presidency “the most unfortunate thing that could have happened to Kenya,” Muturi has since adopted a combative tone. His Easter post, in the eyes of many, was just another attempt to grab headlines.

    Final Thoughts

    Kenyans have a sharp eye and an even sharper tongue online. To them, Muturi’s poster wasn’t just bad design—it was tone-deaf, vain, and attention-seeking.

    And with the backlash spreading fast, one thing is clear: if Muturi wanted to resurrect his public image this Easter, he failed spectacularly.

  • Junet Reveals Plan to Summon Muturi Over Sh10B Missing From Bunge Towers Construction

    Junet Reveals Plan to Summon Muturi Over Sh10B Missing From Bunge Towers Construction

    In what could be interpreted as a retaliatory move, Minority Leader Junet Mohammed has threatened to table a motion in Parliament to compel former Public Service Cabinet Secretary (CS) Justin Muturi to appear before the House.

    The motion seeks to have Muturi explain how the cost of constructing Bunge Towers escalated by Sh10 billion during his tenure as Speaker of the National Assembly.

    This development comes just days after Muturi’s scathing exposé, in which he described President William Ruto’s administration as irredeemably corrupt.

    Speaking in Mombasa, where he attended the Eid Baraza on Saturday, April 5, 2025, Junet dismissed Muturi’s recent claims, arguing that the former CS should have reported the alleged corruption to the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) instead of airing them publicly.

    Junet also took a swipe at Muturi, recalling how the former Speaker had refused to support Raila Odinga’s presidential bid ahead of the 2022 elections.

    “Before the 2022 elections, I approached him as my Speaker and asked him to support my father [Raila Odinga] for president. He told me he’d rather back ‘our thief Ruto’ than my father. Now, today, Ruto has become a bad person in his eyes. We’ve moved past such foolishness; we won’t be deceived by such tactics,” Junet remarked.

    While criticizing Muturi’s accusations against Ruto, Junet also shed light on the former CS’s alleged role in the Bunge Towers scandal, calling for fresh investigations into the matter.

    Muturi’s Accusations

    In a revealing interview, former Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi accused President William Ruto of corruption, hypocrisy, and maintaining an iron-fisted grip over his Cabinet.

    Muturi claimed that Ruto pressured him to sign a Ksh129 billion tree-planting deal with Russian oligarchs and resisted attempts to force him to approve the controversial Arror and Kimwarer dam projects.

    He further alleged that Ruto governs by instilling fear in his Cabinet and had initially tried to lure him into accepting the role of Attorney General.

    “Justin Muturi spoke yesterday, and he said a lot. But all those things he’s saying, he should take them to the electoral body or the EACC for investigation. Because I, too, have a lot to say about him,” Junet said. “As an MP, I want to bring another motion.

    “He’s talked about everything except one issue. There’s a building at Parliament called Bunge Towers, which houses MPs’ offices. When we, as MPs, sat down, that building was supposed to be constructed for Ksh6 billion. By the time Muturi came into office, it was built for Ksh27 billion. He should explain to us how that house went from Ksh6 billion to Ksh27 billion.”

  • Defiant Muturi Stands Firm: Refuses to Resign, Explains Cabinet Absences, and Defends Stance on Abductions

    Defiant Muturi Stands Firm: Refuses to Resign, Explains Cabinet Absences, and Defends Stance on Abductions

    Public Service Cabinet Secretary (CS) Justin Muturi has dismissed calls from a section of government leaders urging him to step down, even as speculation grows about a fallout with his boss, President William Ruto.

    Muturi, speaking during Citizen TV’s JKLive show on Wednesday, addressed concerns surrounding his recent absences from Cabinet meetings and rumors of his looming resignation. He revealed that he had requested to be excused from the meetings until the issues of police abductions and extrajudicial killings were formally tabled on the agenda.

    The CS has missed three Cabinet meetings over the past three months, failing to attend sittings on January 21, February 11, and March 11, 2025. This sparked rumors of a possible rift between him and President Ruto. However, Muturi clarified that while attendance at Cabinet meetings is mandatory, he had sought permission from the President to be excused due to his stance on the widespread abductions and killings that followed the anti-government demonstrations in June 2024.

    “It is mandatory to attend meetings unless given authority or excused by the chair of the Cabinet, who is the president. But people do get indisposed for all manner of reasons,” Muturi said.

    “In my case, I have written and sought to be excused from Cabinet meetings unless the agenda of abductions and extrajudicial killings is formally tabled before Cabinet, through a Cabinet memorandum, so that the Cabinet is able to express itself and give the country the way forward with regards to these issues. So, I sought to be excused for these reasons.”

    Muturi strongly denied claims of insubordination, stating, “It is not insubordination when you seek to be excused.”

    Earlier in the broadcast, Muturi allayed concerns about speculation regarding his possible resignation, insisting that there are no sufficient grounds for him to quit office. He expressed confidence in his position in the Cabinet and dismissed allegations of insubordination related to his recent remarks, which some interpreted as critical of the ruling regime.

    According to Muturi, his decision to call out the President and the government over the abductions and killings of Gen Z protesters late last year falls within his sworn mandate as a public servant. He argued that he should instead be applauded for his stance.

    He recalled that the Kenya Kwanza alliance, during the campaign period, vowed to put an end to enforced disappearances. Muturi emphasized that he is merely urging the Ruto administration to uphold a promise it made to the Kenyan people after ascending to power.

    “The issue I raised on January 12 was an objection to abductions and extrajudicial killings that were happening in the country. In that statement, I indicated that it is time we, as a government, debated these issues because, if left unaddressed, they have the potential to drag this country into chaos and anarchy,” Muturi said.

    “As far as I know, it is not the policy of the government to abduct or to have people killed. Speaking against that cannot be grounds for anybody to resign from office. Indeed, I think I should be congratulated for restating the government’s position, which is also informed by our Constitution, which we all swore to protect, defend, and uphold.”

    Muturi further pointed out that his sentiments were considered and ultimately led to the government addressing the issue of abductions. He underscored that he only sought to ensure that the rule of law is upheld and that the arrest and prosecution of offenders follow due process.

    “If indeed people were arrested, they should be presented before a court within 24 hours. According to the Constitution, they should also be informed within the same duration of the reason for their arrest, and/or abduction, as the case may be,” he stated.

    At the same time, Muturi remained coy about the recent move by his former Democratic Party (DP) to sever ties with the Kenya Kwanza alliance. He noted that it was the sole decision of the political outfit’s organs, of which he is no longer a member.

    Muturi’s defiant stance, coupled with his absence from Cabinet meetings, suggests he is prepared for a potential fallout, even as speculation grows about his possible sacking.

  • Ruto’s Political Dilemma: Why He Is Scared of Firing Muturi

    Ruto’s Political Dilemma: Why He Is Scared of Firing Muturi

    President William Ruto finds himself at a political crossroads with Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi, whose criticisms of the administration’s handling of abductions and extrajudicial killings have placed Ruto in a precarious position.

    The situation is not just about managing dissent within his government but also about maintaining political support in the volatile Mt Kenya region, where Muturi hails from.

    The Core of the Dilemma

    Muturi’s outspoken critique against the government, particularly on the sensitive issue of abductions, has made him a divisive figure within the Kenya Kwanza administration. His personal stake in the matter, following the abduction of his son by suspected state agents, lends credibility to his criticisms, resonating with the public and potentially eroding trust in Ruto’s leadership. This situation is complicated by the fact that Muturi’s actions mirror the political tactics Ruto himself used against former President Uhuru Kenyatta, highlighting a potential hypocrisy if Muturi were to be fired.

    Implications of Action or Inaction

    Firing Muturi: This could alienate Ruto from Mt Kenya East, a region already showing signs of political restlessness following the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. Muturi could become a martyr-like figure, rallying opposition and potentially joining forces with anti-Kenya Kwanza factions, thereby intensifying political opposition.

    Retaining Muturi: Keeping him in the Cabinet might expose internal divisions within the administration, signaling weakness or lack of control. However, it keeps potential adversaries closer, where they can be monitored and possibly managed, as suggested by political analyst Prof. David Monda. This strategy, however, risks further emboldening Muturi, who might escalate his criticisms unless checked.

    Muturi’s Strategic Positioning

    Muturi appears acutely aware of his leverage, as evidenced by his absence from key Cabinet meetings, possibly as a tactic to force a decision from Ruto. His recent public demands for an inquiry into abductions and his framing of these actions as a national crisis amplify his position, making his dismissal not just a personnel decision but a political statement.

    Public and Political Sentiment

    The public, especially in areas affected by these abductions, might view Muturi as a voice of reason within a government perceived to be out of touch or worse, complicit in these human rights violations. Politicians like Kitui Senator Enoch Wambua and Embakasi Central MP Benjamin Gathiru suggest that Muturi’s stance aligns with public sentiment, particularly in Mt Kenya, where support for Ruto could waver further if Muturi is seen as unfairly targeted.

    The Cost of Firing Muturi

    The biggest risk of firing Muturi is that it could turn him into a political martyr, fueling the growing discontent in the Mt Kenya region. Already, Ruto faces hostility in Mt Kenya West following the impeachment of former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. Firing Muturi, who hails from Mt Kenya East, could alienate another key faction of the region, undermining Ruto’s efforts to maintain political dominance.

    According to news reports citing a State House insider, the government is reluctant to sack Muturi immediately, fearing that doing so would position him as a hero standing up against government excesses. Muturi’s criticism of abductions resonates with many Kenyans, particularly those who have lost loved ones. The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR) has recorded 89 cases of enforced disappearances since June 2024, with 29 people still missing.

    Firing Muturi under these circumstances could backfire, amplifying opposition voices and reinforcing the narrative that Ruto’s government is intolerant of dissent.

    A Playbook Ruto Knows Well

    Critics argue that Muturi is following the same political strategy that Ruto himself used against former President Uhuru Kenyatta. When Ruto was Deputy President, he frequently criticized Kenyatta’s administration, particularly on economic mismanagement and extrajudicial killings. However, despite the tensions, Kenyatta did not fire Ruto, fearing it would make him a political martyr.

    Now, Ruto finds himself in Kenyatta’s shoes, facing a rebellious insider who is using government failings as political ammunition. Muturi’s open defiance, including his absence from the first Cabinet meeting of 2025, suggests he is daring the President to fire him—perhaps as a calculated move to position himself for future political relevance.

    Keeping Enemies Close?

    Political analysts, including US-based Professor David Monda, argue that Ruto is caught between a rock and a hard place. Firing Muturi could embolden the growing anti-Kenya Kwanza coalition led by Gachagua, while retaining him allows Muturi to continue undermining the administration from within. Ruto’s strategy of keeping his enemies close may be a temporary fix, but it is unlikely to resolve the underlying tensions.

    Way Forward

    Ruto’s options are limited. Retaining Muturi risks further erosion of public trust and internal cohesion, while firing him could ignite political unrest in Mt Kenya and beyond. Some observers suggest that Ruto may eventually be forced to act if Muturi’s attacks escalate. However, any move against Muturi must be carefully calibrated to avoid alienating key constituencies.

    The situation in Mt Kenya remains volatile, and Ruto has already deployed Interior CS Prof. Kithure Kindiki to calm tensions in the region. If the administration regains political ground, Ruto may feel confident enough to dismiss Muturi and replace him with a more loyal figure, such as Kiraitu Murungi.

    However, if the hostility persists, firing Muturi could further inflame Mt Kenya East, potentially creating another political headache for Ruto.

    In the meantime, Ruto’s administration faces mounting pressure to address the abductions and extrajudicial killings that have fueled Muturi’s defiance. Ignoring these issues will only deepen the crisis and provide more fodder for Ruto’s critics. As Machakos Deputy Governor Francis Mwangangi aptly put it, Muturi is not against the government but against the bad actions of individuals within it. Addressing these concerns head-on may be the only way for Ruto to navigate this political minefield.

    Ruto’s handling of the Muturi dilemma will be a defining moment for his presidency. Firing Muturi risks alienating Mt Kenya East and giving his critics more ammunition. Keeping him in government exposes internal divisions and weakens the credibility of his administration.

    Ultimately, Ruto’s decision will depend on whether he can contain the growing discontent in Mt Kenya. If he manages to stabilize the region politically, Muturi’s exit may become inevitable. But for now, the President remains stuck between a rock and a hard place, trying to balance political survival with governance credibility.

  • Enough Is Enough, Maraga Condemns Rising Abductions And Extrajudicial Killings In Kenya

    Enough Is Enough, Maraga Condemns Rising Abductions And Extrajudicial Killings In Kenya

    Former Chief Justice David Maraga has joined the growing calls for an end to the alarming trend of abductions and extrajudicial killings in Kenya.

    Maraga has vehemently condemned the escalating violence targeting Kenyan youth, describing it as a grave violation of human rights. His remarks come in the wake of the tragic discovery of the bodies of Martin Mwau and Justus Musyimi, two of the four individuals who had gone missing from Mlolongo. Their remains were found at City Mortuary after a month-long search.

    Calling the abductions and killings a “stain on our collective conscience as a nation,” Maraga urged Kenyans to take a stand against these atrocities by declaring #EnoughisEnough and #EndAbductionsNow. He stressed that such crimes represent a profound betrayal of Kenya’s future and the fundamental principles enshrined in the Constitution.

    “Leadership that abets a culture of killings and human rights violations jeopardizes its legitimacy,” Maraga warned, calling for an immediate end to the violence that has disproportionately targeted young Kenyans. He emphasized that every Kenyan has the right to live in safety and security and to pursue their dreams without fear.

    “We cannot be lulled into complacency in the face of such assaults to our shared humanity. Every Kenyan and particularly our youth, deserves to live in safety and security and to pursue their dreams. I stand in unity with all Kenyans of good conscience and call for the immediate release of all young people who are still being held incommunicado.” He said.

    In his call to action, Maraga demanded the immediate release of all young people still being held without communication and urged accountability and justice for the victims and their families. “Let us work together to build a society that upholds the rule of law, constitutionalism, and integrity.”

    Other leaders voices

    Earlier on, Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi had condemned the abductions calling for a public inquiry into the saga and pleaded with the president to call to an end to the abductions and killings.

    “Mr. President, I’m calling upon you now to order an end to these abductions, extra-judicial killings and an open enquiry to look into what has been happening.”

    Muturi urged President William Ruto not to turn a blind eye on the matter saying the increasing number of abductions and extrajudicial killings is alarming and ought to be addressed urgently.

    “This is a very serious matter and it should anger the country. We are allowing young men and women to be kidnapped only later to be found dead. Surely, what country are we and we are pretending to be solving issues in DRC?” he posed.

    “This is a serious issue, the number of people who have died are so many that it should prick the conscience of any right-thinking leader,” he added.

    The Public Service cabinet secretary who has recently become a vocal critic on the ongoing abductions insisted he will not be cowed in calling out the ills of the government which has caused anguish among affected Kenyans.

    “I sit in government and am not aware of any policies that support abductions and extrajudicial killings. It is not right that parents can stay in excess of 40 days looking for their loved ones and we stay somewhere claiming that we are discussing economy for this country,” Muturi noted.

    Muturi’s bold stance follows the tragic deaths of individuals abducted from Mlolongo.

    Narc Kenya Party leader Martha Karua has also condemned the government for failing to address the ongoing abduction and execution epidemic in Kenya, which she says has continued unchecked for nearly a year.

    She accused President Ruto’s regime of being complicit in the crisis, citing cases of Turkish nationals, Ugandans in Kisumu, and Dr. Kizza Besigye as evidence of state involvement or cover-up.

    Karua said, “The abductions admitted by the state, like that of Turkish nationals, of the 36 Ugandans in Kisumu and that of Dr. Kizza Besigye, bear striking similarities with others, making it inescapable that state security agencies are part of the abductions or covering them up.”

  • Muturi Boycotts Ruto Cabinet Meeting In Kakamega

    Muturi Boycotts Ruto Cabinet Meeting In Kakamega

    Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi was conspicuously missing during the first Cabinet meeting of 2025 held at State Lodge in Kakamega on Tuesday.

    The meeting chaired by President William Ruto reached a series of resolutions, including the merger of 42 state corporations into 20 as a cost-cutting measure.

    All of Ruto’s cabinet members except Muturi were absent at the meeting.

    When asked by this writer whether there was a compelling reason for his absence, Muturi replied with a simple “Yes” without expounding.

    On January 12, Muturi appeared to have broken ranks with the government when he held a press conference at the Serena Hotel in  Nairobi and called for a national dialogue regarding alleged abduction of Kenyans and blamed the government for having a hand in it.

    The former Attorney General said he had taken the divergent stand from the government position, which has consistently denied involvement, because he was a victim after his son was abducted on June 22, 2024.

    His remarks sparked public debate and prompted the Directorate of Criminal Investigations to invite him to record a statement regarding his son to help facilitate ongoing investigations.

    In his statement to the DCI, Muturi said it took the intervention of President Ruto to have his son released after hours of anxiety and fruitless attempts to have senior government officers facilitate the release of his son, who he said a friend at the National Intelligence Service (NIS) intimated to him was being held by them.

    The President joked, asking why anyone would want to arrest a young person over the Gen Z demonstrations,” he said.

    Muturi said he requested the President to speak directly to NIS boss Noordin Haji, which he did.

    Standing outside the pavilion, I heard the President ask Noordin Haji if he was holding my son, Noordin confirmed, that indeed he was holding my son and the President instructed him to release Leslie immediately. Noordin responded that Leslie would be released within an hour,” he said.

    A number of officials in government castigated Muturi over his remarks saying they were insensitive as they touched on national security agency.

  • ‘They’ve Kept The Country Safe’ Itumbi Defends NIS Amidst Allegations of Abduction

    ‘They’ve Kept The Country Safe’ Itumbi Defends NIS Amidst Allegations of Abduction

    Nairobi – Dennis Itumbi, the Head of Presidential Special Projects and Creative Economy, has come to the defense of the National Intelligence Service (NIS), describing it as the backbone of stability in Kenya and the region. His comments follow recent allegations by Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justine Muturi, who accused NIS of being behind the abduction of his son, Leslie Muturi, in June of last year.

    Muturi, who was the Attorney General at the time of the incident, directly implicated NIS Director General Noordin Haji, demanding an explanation for the motive behind the alleged abduction.

    In a statement issued on his social media pages, Itumbi praised the NIS, highlighting his personal experiences during training sessions at the NIS headquarters. “The truth is that it is very hard to love the National Intelligence Service (NIS), it is actually easier to hate and criticize them,” Itumbi remarked, acknowledging the service’s often thankless role.

    He added that the urgency has become a punching bag for those who aim at fighting the president or the government given its voiceless nature, “it is actually easier to hate and criticize them. Especially when the real target of the criticism is the Government or the President himself. NIS is always an easy target—silent, vigilant, without a voice of their own.” He said.

    He emphasized the NIS’s crucial, often unseen, work in maintaining national security, citing instances where the service had neutralized threats, though specifics remain undisclosed due to security oaths.

    NIS Director General Noordin Haji.

    Itumbi recounted how former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua had praised the NIS for its self-correcting systems and dedication to national security during these training sessions. “Under Noordin Haji’s tenure, this legacy not only persisted but also encouraged dialogue with society as a whole,” Itumbi added, suggesting a balance between intelligence work and public accountability.

    Itumbi lauded the heroic efforts by the intelligence agency in averting attacks in the country, “think about this: How many unseen threats does the NIS neutralize each day to keep us safe? Threats we may never hear of, but ones that could change our lives forever.” He said.

    Addressing the criticism directly, Itumbi does not deny the need for accountability, especially regarding serious allegations like abductions. “So, should we remain silent about abductions? That’s not my point at all. Speak up, demand answers through thorough investigations,” he stated, advocating for a transparent process to hold those responsible accountable.

    However, he urged for a measured perspective when critiquing national institutions like the NIS. “But even as we raise our voices, let us not forget to reserve the respect due to one of our foremost institutions,” he concluded, emphasizing the NIS’s role in national unity and security.

  • Resign Or I Table Impeachment Motion, Aldai MP Now Dares Muturi Over His Abductions Outburst

    Resign Or I Table Impeachment Motion, Aldai MP Now Dares Muturi Over His Abductions Outburst

    Aldai Member of Parliament Marianne Kittany has hit out at Public Service Cabinet Secretary Justin Muturi for his recent outburst concerning the increasing number of abductions in the country.

    The lawmaker argues that as a Cabinet Secretary, Muturi has appropriate channels to express his concerns, rather than addressing them publicly as he did over the weekend.

    “Public Service CS Justin Muturi is a member of the Cabinet, where he can address any concerns he has. When he chooses to bring up the issue of abductions through the media, what does he expect ordinary Kenyans to do?” she stated.

    Kittany contends that there was no justification for his decision to address the issue via the press.

    “The Cabinet is the highest decision-making body in the Republic of Kenya. Justin Muturi is a member of this Cabinet, and it is there that he should have sought answers regarding the abduction of his son,” reiterated the legislator.

    She insists that the CS’s actions were ill-advised and in poor taste, warranting his resignation from the cabinet. Should Muturi ignore her calls, Kittany warned that she will draft a motion to seek his removal from office.

  • CS Muturi Condemns Govt Over Abductions, Calls for Open Debate

    CS Muturi Condemns Govt Over Abductions, Calls for Open Debate

    Nairobi – Cabinet Secretary for Public Service and Human Capital Development, Justin Muturi, has publicly criticized the Kenyan security sector for its apparent inaction regarding the ongoing abductions. During a media briefing on January 12, 2025, Muturi highlighted the discrepancy between the security forces’ denial of involvement and their failure to prevent these abductions, which he noted are occurring “publicly in broad daylight.”

    Muturi shared a personal experience, revealing that his son was among those abducted. “My son was abducted and disappeared. I was not sure whether he was alive or dead,” he said, recounting the distressing period where he was unable to locate his son despite multiple inquiries. His son was eventually released after more than six months without any charges being filed against him.

    The Cabinet Secretary emphasized the importance of democratic principles, stating, “If youths have issues with the government that they want to raise, let us allow them to do so because that is what democracy is all about. We are a democratic county. It is our duty as government to ensure that everybody lives freely and is able to say what they think.”

    Muturi’s comments come at a time when there is increasing public concern over security practices and the government’s responsibility towards its citizens. He stressed that his personal experience as a victim positioned within the government compelled him to speak out. “Since I am also a victim while serving in this government, I have taken this unusual step so that abductions and extra-judicial activities can be debated in the country in order to find a solution,” Muturi explained.

    He warned of the potential consequences of such unchecked actions, suggesting that they could “plunge the country into chaos and anarchy.” This statement echoes a broader conversation trending on social media platforms, where there’s significant public outcry and demand for accountability regarding government actions.

    Muturi’s call for an open debate on these issues marks a significant moment, signaling a possible shift or at least a moment of reflection within the government about its policies on security and civil liberties. His position as a Cabinet Secretary lends weight to the urgency of addressing these concerns, potentially prompting other officials and civil society to engage more actively in finding solutions to prevent such violations in the future.

  • Rebecca Miano: A Profile of Ruto’s Attorney General Nominee

    Rebecca Miano: A Profile of Ruto’s Attorney General Nominee

    Rebecca Miano, a prominent Kenyan lawyer and current Cabinet Secretary, stands out for her impactful career in public service.

    Born and raised in Nyandarua County, she has held key positions, including CEO of KenGen and Cabinet Secretary for East African Community and Arid Lands.

    Her tenure has seen both significant achievements and controversies, notably involving accusations of financial irregularities.

    Miano’s personal life, marked by her marriage to an environmental expert and her role as a mother, complements her professional journey.

    This article delves into her evolving story which continues to capture public and political interest.

    Rebecca Miano

    Who is Rebecca Miano?

    Rebecca Wanjiku Miano, born in 1966 and currently 58 years old, is a Kenyan lawyer and a nominee for the position of Attorney General of Kenya.

    She has served as the Cabinet Secretary for Investments, Trade & Industry since October 2023 but was dismissed from this role on July 11, 2024.

    Previously, she was the Cabinet Secretary for East African Community, ASALs, and Regional Development.

    Despite facing corruption scandals in her earlier roles and having questionable legal skills, she has been nominated for Attorney General following a series of anti-government protests.

    Before joining the Cabinet, she was the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of KenGen Plc, the largest electricity producer in East Africa, from November 2017.

    She was officially confirmed in this role on November 1, 2017, after serving in an acting capacity since August 2017.

    Early Life and Education

    Miano was born and raised in Ndaragua Constituency, Nyandarua County. She is the second youngest of 14 children.

    She attended Kapropita Girls School in Baringo County and then went to the University of Nairobi to study law. Later, she earned a Diploma in Law from the Kenya School of Law.

    Miano also completed postgraduate studies in Comparative Law at the University of Australia.

    She holds a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Nairobi and attended the Advocates Training Programme at the Kenya School of Law.

    Additionally, she earned a Master of Laws in Comparative Law from the Australian National University.

    Professional Career

     

    Miano started her career at a law firm in Nairobi called Musyoka Annan & Company Advocates. She then worked at Slater and Gordon, a law firm in Queensland, Australia.

    In 1998, she joined Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen) as an assistant legal officer. She gradually moved up to become the assistant company secretary.

    By August 2017, she was the Director of Legal Affairs and Company Secretary at KenGen. She held these roles since 2008. She was promoted to Acting Managing Director in August 2017.

    In November 2017, Miano was appointed as Managing Director, beating 90 other candidates. She replaced Albert Mugo, who retired after reaching the mandatory retirement age of 60.

    Miano became the first and only female chief executive at KenGen.

    By that time, she was one of only two women leading a parastatal company in Kenya, the other being MaryJane Mwangi of the National Oil Corporation of Kenya.

    Career in government

    Miano later served as the Cabinet Secretary for East African Community and Arid and Semi-Arid Lands. H.E. Dr. William Samoei Ruto announced this appointment on September 27, 2022, at State House, Kenya.

    In 2023, she succeeded Moses Kuria as the Trade Minister.

    On May 23, 2024, Miano attended a state dinner hosted by U.S. President Joe Biden in honor of President Ruto at the White House.

    Miano is a member of the Law Society of Kenya and the Institute of Certified Public Secretaries of Kenya.

    Rebecca Miano Scandals

    Earlier this year, Rebecca Miano faced accusations of procurement and financial irregularities from her time as CEO of Kenya Electricity Generating Company (KenGen).

    A lobby group filed an ouster petition at the High Court, accusing her of spending Ksh94 billion of taxpayers’ money on ineffective power generation projects.

    She also faced criticism for contributing to recent national blackouts. The accusations include commissioning unusable high-voltage transmission lines and conducting feasibility studies for two new power plants that never became operational.

    Personal Life

    Rebecca Miano is married to an environmental expert and has two biological children and a niece. In her free time, she enjoys reading, traveling, watching plays, and occasional knitting.

    Her son, Peter Miano, celebrated his traditional wedding with his fiancé, Wambui Kibe, in Nairobi on April 6, 2024.

    Rebecca Miano’s Net Worth

    Rebecca’s net worth is estimated at Ksh. 500 million. When she joined Ruto’s cabinet in 2022, her net worth was Ksh. 397 million, as reported during her vetting before Parliament on October 21, 2022.

    She explained that she and her husband built their wealth over 30 years.

    At that time, she noted they owned two houses: one in Nairobi and one in their rural home. They also had three vehicles: a Toyota Prado, an Isuzu truck, and a Mitsubishi Pajero.

    Rebecca shared with the vetting committee, “I have a house in Nairobi, another in Nyahururu, and the rest are properties my husband and I have acquired over the last 30 years. The value reflects the current market value, which has appreciated over time.”

  • Uhuru dumping is the peculiar thing with 2022 politics

    Uhuru dumping is the peculiar thing with 2022 politics

    The race to 2022 elections began taking shape after the infamous handshake between President Uhuru Kenyatta and the opposition chief Hon. Raila Odinga. Events that followed the handshake exposed Uhuru’s betrayal of his deputy, Dr. William Ruto whom he had promised to back upon expiry of his term.

    Jubilee purge was the core of it all where the president directed that all politicians allied to his deputy be kicked from party leadership and parliamentary committees. The purge went on further with futile attempts to even kick out Ruto from the DP position or to push him resign but they only succeeded in uprooting him as the deputy leader of the ruling Jubilee party.

    Ruto’s position was taken by little known Jimmy Angwenyi months after he had moved on and formed United Democratic Alliance (UDA Party) where he is the boss and has beaten Jubilee in many by-elections.

    But despite the onslaughts targeting Ruto allied politicians and raw abuse of power where police and bodies like Kenya Revenue Authority and Ethics and Anti Corruption Commissions have been used to intimidate UDA politicians, the DP’s camp has interestingly attracted the president’s foot soldiers.

    Speaker of the National Assembly Justin Muturi is the latest top leader from the President’s backyard to join Kenya Kwanza Alliance where Ruto is a top presidential contender.

    Muturi who recently joined Senate Speaker Kenneth Lusaka in Kenya Kwanza had received the president’s backing prior to his coronation as Mt. Kenya Spokesperson in May last year.

    His coronation was touted as a cultural event but had a huge impact on power and succession politics in the President Uhuru’s turf. The endorsement as GEMA spokesman boosted his political ambitions and he has carried it all to the Deputy President’s camp where he can negotiate for a running mate position.

    It gave him all the guts to cast his political net beyond his Mt Kenya East region and try to forge the next direction for politics in the entire Mt. Kenya region.

    “The idea is to be able to reach out to everybody and bring in as much as possible through persuasion, consultation and discussion. I am capable of carrying out the responsibilities elders will bestow on me” Muturi said.

    And more interestingly, even Kirinyaga Governor Anne Waiguru who was initially opposed to Muturi’s endorsement as the regions kingpin had shifted her allegiance from President Uhuru Kenyatta whom she dump for DP William Ruto.

    They have tried to intimidate Waiguru through attempts to revive her corruption cases but with no success. She told off the president in one of the dailies that she has moved on and is comfortable in UDA, leaving Azimio old guards to settle for washed out politicians like Martha Karua and Kitui’s Charity Ngilu who is likely to lose her gubernatorial seat.

    But even prominent politicians from the President’s home county of Kiambu have dumped him for William Ruto. Hon. Moses Kuria of Gatundu South is in Kenya Kwanza, Kiambu Women rep Gathoni wa Muchomba dumped Uhuru’s Jubilee Party for DP’s UDA, former Kiambu governors Ferdinand Waititu and William Kabogo are all in Ruto’s camp. Kiambu speaker and more than twenty MCAs have also expressed their support for UDA and Ruto’s bid.

    The situation is the same in neighboring Murang’a County where Senator Irungu Kang’ata who is poised to be the next governor is dining with Ruto. The vocal Kandara MP Alice Wahome is with Ruto and so is Hon. Ndindi Nyoro of Kiharu Constituency.

    Nyeri Governor Kahiga Mutahi, Nyeri County Assembly Speaker and a host of MCAs have publicly expressed their support for DP’s UDA party and his bid for presidency in the August polls.

    A top Kenya Kwanza principal and ANC Party Leader H.E Musalia Mudavadi has joked that Uhuru will one day wake up and find that his bodyguards have deserted him.