Tag: Immigration department

  • BRITISH BIGSHOT’S DIRTY IMMIGRATION SECRETS EXPOSED BY SCORNED WIFE

    BRITISH BIGSHOT’S DIRTY IMMIGRATION SECRETS EXPOSED BY SCORNED WIFE

    Explosive documents reveal how high-flying investor allegedly played Kenya’s immigration system while hiding Australian wife

    In a scandal that has rocked Nairobi’s expatriate circles, a British national working for one of Africa’s most prestigious investment firms stands accused of cooking up fake documents to secure Kenyan residency while secretly married to an Australian woman.

    Kabir Chal, a director at global investment powerhouse Actis, is now at the center of a messy love-and-lies drama that has immigration officials scrambling for answers.

    His estranged wife, Jasreen Pandher, has blown the whistle on what she calls a calculated scheme to manipulate Kenya’s immigration laws.

    The Australian beauty claims her husband conveniently forgot to mention their marriage when filling out his work permit applications, instead ticking the “single” box like a bachelor on the prowl.

    But here’s where it gets juicy: while declaring himself a free man on paper, Chal allegedly used the dependency clause to sweet-talk his way into permanent residency.

    Pandher, who says she’s legally bound to the British national, has fired off angry letters to the Ministry of Interior, painting a picture of a man who would stop at nothing to get what he wants. She’s not just bitter about being dumped – she claims his fraudulent papers have left her trapped in Kenya, unable to leave the country while their messy situation gets sorted.

    “This man lied through his teeth on official documents while we were still married,” sources close to Pandher reveal. “Now she’s stuck here dealing with the fallout of his games.”

    But wait, there’s more. Word on the street is that Chal didn’t just waltz into Kenya’s immigration system – he allegedly had friends in very high places. Whispers around town suggest the British wheeler-dealer penetrated the immigration docket during former President Uhuru Kenyatta’s reign, reportedly name-dropping his cozy relationship with the then-feared Interior Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiang’i to anyone who would listen.

    Those who’ve crossed paths with Chal describe a man who loved flashing his connections like designer watches. “He would boast about his ties to Matiang’i,” an insider spills. “Made it sound like he had the whole immigration department in his pocket.”

    The plot thickens when you look at Actis itself. The investment giant, known for throwing millions around Africa’s real estate and consumer markets, allegedly let its operating license expire. So what was Chal really doing at a firm that may not have even been legally operating in the region? Questions, questions, questions.

    When confronted about the bombshell allegations, Chal dismissed everything as “false, misleading and shocking.” Classic response from someone caught with their hand in the cookie jar, if you ask me.

    But Pandher isn’t buying his denials. She’s calling for a full-blown investigation into how her estranged husband secured his documents, suggesting there’s been serious manipulation of official records. Immigration Director Evelyn Cheluget now has a hot potato on her desk that could expose serious cracks in Kenya’s vetting system for foreign nationals.

    The scandal raises uncomfortable questions: How did Chal’s applications sail through without anyone checking his marital status? Who signed off on his papers? And if he really was dropping Matiang’i’s name, did that grease any wheels?

    For Pandher, this isn’t just about a cheating husband – it’s about a system that can apparently be gamed by anyone with the right connections and enough nerve to lie on government forms. She’s demanding answers, and she wants the whole rotten process investigated.

    As immigration officials dig through Chal’s paperwork with fresh eyes, one thing is crystal clear: this British bigshot’s charmed life in Nairobi may be about to come crashing down. And his Australian wife? She’s making sure everyone knows exactly how he allegedly pulled off his Kenyan dream.

    The Ministry of Interior has remained tight-lipped, but sources say they’re now combing through Chal’s entire file. If Pandher’s allegations hold water, this could blow the lid off a much bigger problem – foreign nationals exploiting Kenya’s immigration system while officials look the other way.

    Stay tuned. This story is just getting started.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

    Immigration Department Center, Nyayo House.
    Immigration Department Center, Nyayo House.
  • New Conditions For Visa-Free Entry Into Kenya

    New Conditions For Visa-Free Entry Into Kenya

    All passengers getting into the country will be subjected to advance screening using the Electronic Travel Authorisation if a proposed amendment to the law is enacted.

    The Ministry of Interior has proposed a Bill, The Kenya Citizenship and Immigration (Amendment) Regulations, 2023 that seeks to amend the principal regulations by introducing advance passenger information (API) and to secure the data.

    According to the Bill, API means the biographic data of a passenger or crew member and the flight details of an aircraft operator and other relevant details, against security databases before they even arrive in the country.

    The proposed changes, introducing prescreening, follow President William Ruto’s announcement of visa-free entry to Kenya.

    The airlines or agents will play a key role in providing information and where access to specific API is necessary to respond to a threat, the aircraft operator will supply accurate data to the director of Immigration.

    If the information is found to be erroneous, faulty or misleading, the airline shall be liable to pay an administrative penalty of USD10,000 (Sh1.57million).

    “An administrative penalty shall not be payable where the aircraft operator or pilot in command of the aircraft satisfies the director that the contravention was not made knowingly or recklessly,” the regulations state.

    Immigration process

    The amendment also seeks to digitise immigration processes and integrate border services to enhance efficiency, improve security measures, facilitate a streamlined travel experience, and ensure security.

    The Regulations seeks to amend the principal regulations, the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Regulations, 2012 by, for example, deleting the word “visa” and substituting it with the words “Electronic Travel Authorisation”.

    According to the regulations, each person intending to travel into the country shall apply to the Director for ETA through the electronic portal and be in possession of the Authorisation before embarking.

    However, possession of an Electronic Travel Authorization shall not constitute final authority to enter the country.

    Each carrier coming into the country shall not on-board a passenger who does not hold a valid ETA.

    The captain in charge of a carrier shall be responsible for ensuring that each passenger on board the aircraft holds a valid Electronic Travel Authorisation.

    Country of origin

    Any carrier that brings into Kenya a person who does not hold a valid ETA shall return that passenger to his or her last port of call or country of origin.

    “Each carrier entering into Kenya or its operator or agent shall submit advance passenger information (API) and passenger Name record (PNR) to the director,” the regulations state.

    For the purposes of carrying out assessment under these regulations, an Immigration officer may compare API or data against databases of persons sought or under alert watch list, including criminal deportees, suspected terrorists and other persons of interest to the intelligence community.

    The officers shall handle the data exclusively within a secure location within Kenya, and all information will be processed in accordance with the provisions of the Data Protection Act, 2019.

    Where an Immigration Officer determines that a passenger should be subject to further examination, he or she will give the control agencies -Directorate of Criminal Investigations, Anti-Narcotics Unit, Transnational organized Crime Unit, Antiterrorism Police Unit, National Intelligence Service (NIS), Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) Customs, or the Port Health -the information.

    The Director shall, six months after taking possession of API and passenger data, render the data elements unreadable to other people, commonly referring to as depersonalising.

    The Director may however reverse the depersonalisation of data where such reversal is necessary for the purpose of preventing, detecting, investigating or prosecuting an offence.

    The specified offences include terrorism; participation in a criminal organization; trafficking in human beings; sexual offences, including exploitation of children and child pornography; illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs, weapons and explosives; corruption; fraud; and laundering of the proceeds of crime.

    Others are cybercrime; forgery of administrative documents; crimes within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court; unlawful seizure of aircraft; piracy; sabotage; and industrial espionage The data shall be kept for a period of five years.

    Any visa that has been granted before the amendment shall remain valid for its unexpired period except where it is otherwise revoked in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

    DATA NEEDED

    According to the regulations, the API data elements relating to flight (header data) will include flight identification, scheduled departure date and time, and scheduled arrival date and time.

    The information about the passenger and crew members on board include official travel document number; issuing state or organisation of the official travel document; official travel document type and expiry date; names, nationality, date of birth and gender; visa number, date and place of issuance; and primary residence among others.

  • Paul Topf, The Missing Ex-Germany Soldier Was Deported By Kenyan Authorities

    Paul Topf, The Missing Ex-Germany Soldier Was Deported By Kenyan Authorities

    In what looks like, my opinion— a botched assassination attempt, the Kenyan-based Ex-German soldier reported missing by his Kenyan wife was deported Immigration departments without the wife’s knowledge.

    The main suspect in a case that the DCI had launched investigations Neema Nyawira, the wife to then missing person-Paul Topf, said in a police statement that her husband was, on the 26th of November this year, picked by four men and a woman believed to be police officers from his home in Lungalunga, Kwale County.

    However, Immigration officials informed the Sunday Nation that Topf was deported after the Ministry of Interior received a request from German authorities to have the ex-soldier sent back to his country over crimes he had committed there.

    “He was suspected to be dealing in some suspicious businesses here, the Kenyan government did some investigations on him but they did not get anything and so they handed him back to his government,” an Immigration official, who sought anonymity, told Sunday Nation.

    It remains unclear why the Immigration Department didn’t inform Nyawira of the planned deportation rather subjected her to DCI’s probes.

    Nyawira said that she had been in communication with Topf’s sister, who informed her that her husband arrived safely in Germany.

    On Monday, December 4, she called to inform me that Topf had landed safely in Germany. I am yet to understand why he is yet to reach me on phone,” Nyawira stated.

    So, is this a case study that our so-called TOP STATE AGENCIES don’t share INTELLIGENCE?

    According to DCI sleuths, Topf did not leave the country and even questioned the wife, Nyawira, in connection with the foreigner’s disappearance.

    Did someone want Topf eliminated silently then the wife buried in the mess? How on earth do the Kinoti-led DCI operate without shared Intel from the Immigration Department? I mean this is not just the only case they are investigating, how do they handle cases of corrupt folks and scammers who are at flight risk?

    Maybe I’m overthinking, but this shows that there’s bad-blood between State agencies that, funny enough—are supposed to be in bed to weed out dangerous figures and protect the State.

    Y’all remember when police conducted a raid in the house of Ali Punjani, the dude DCI had flagged as Kenya’s Kingpin of Narcotics only to come out as clowns on live camera nabbing confused Indian wife and totally clueless servants? Well, Immigration Department didn’t tell the Police nor bothered to share the Intel that Punjani had flown out of the country.  Something, rather, everything seems not to be alright…