Tag: Gulf Energy

Kenya To Earn Less From Turkana Oil Deal As Govt Exempts Gulf Energy From Taxes

The Kenyan government has granted Gulf Energy sweeping tax exemptions and increased cost-recovery provisions for the long-delayed Turkana oil project, potentially reducing state revenues from the country’s first commercial crude production by hundreds of millions of dollars.

Under amendments to the production-sharing agreement submitted to parliament last week, Gulf Energy will be exempted from paying value-added tax, withholding taxes and import levies on goods and services used in developing the South Lokichar basin.

The changes remove obligations that previously required developers to pay 16 per cent VAT, 5 per cent and 5.625 per cent withholding tax on local and imported goods respectively, plus a 2 per cent railway development levy and a 2.5 per cent import declaration fee.

The government will take home a smaller share of revenues from Turkana’s oil project following an amendment that raises Gulf Energy’s cost-recovery limit to 85 per cent of annual crude production, an increase from the previous 65 per cent agreement in the initial contract with Tullow Oil.

The modification means Gulf Energy can recoup significantly more of its petroleum costs before profit-sharing with the state begins.

The amendments come after Energy and Petroleum Cabinet Secretary Opiyo Wandayi confirmed that his ministry has approved the Field Development Plan for the project , which now requires parliamentary ratification under Kenya’s constitution.

Energy and Petroleum CS Opiyo Wandayi

The approved development will require an estimated $6.1 billion investment over a 25-year contract period , according to the energy ministry.

The revisions represent a substantial shift from the original terms negotiated when British oil explorer Tullow Oil held the blocks. Tullow had struggled for more than a decade to advance the project after discovering commercially viable reserves in 2012, facing persistent challenges around financing infrastructure including a heated pipeline to transport crude from landlocked Turkana to the Mombasa coast for export.

The sale to Gulf Energy, finalised in July 2025, closed a turbulent chapter for Tullow, which received an initial payment of $40 million under the sale agreement with two additional payments of $40 million each due in 2026 and 2028.

TotalEnergies and Africa Oil Corporation, Tullow’s former partners, had withdrawn from the project in 2023 when financing for the multi-billion-dollar plan collapsed.

The contract amendments also include changes to where crude oil is lifted for marketing purposes. Previously, the government’s share of profit oil was to be lifted at Mombasa, but the revised agreement designates Turkana as the lifting point, effectively shifting transportation responsibilities and associated costs.

According to the amended production-sharing contract, Kenya’s share of profit will start at 50 per cent in the initial stages and increase to 75 per cent at peak production where output is expected at more than 150,000 barrels per day.

The agreement includes a windfall tax provision of 26 per cent triggered when oil prices reach at least $50 per barrel.

The energy ministry estimates recoverable reserves at 326 million stock-tank barrels, with oil initially in place estimated at up to 4 billion barrels.

Phase One aims to produce 20,000 barrels per day, increasing up to 50,000 barrels per day under Phase Two, with Gulf Energy planning first oil production by December 2026 and full production expected by 2032.

Leparan Morintat, chief executive of the state-owned National Oil Corporation of Kenya, said the amendments were meant to harmonise provisions in the two blocks’ agreements and help the project move forward faster.

Under the revised terms, Kenya’s back-in rights for the project are set at 20 per cent for both blocks, to be held by the state oil company.

Gulf Energy, a Nairobi-based energy trading company acquired by French multinational Rubis in 2019 for 16.4 billion shillings, now holds complete control of Block T7 following years of partner exits.

The company operates primarily in downstream petroleum marketing across East Africa.

The parliamentary ratification process is expected to be completed within 90 days. Under Kenya’s Petroleum Act, the field development plan will be deemed ratified if parliament fails to reach a decision within that timeframe.

The government must also incorporate public views before making a final determination.

Industry observers have raised concerns that the enhanced cost-recovery ceiling and tax exemptions may substantially diminish Kenya’s take from the project during its critical early years when Gulf Energy will be recovering its capital investments.

With the higher 85 per cent cost-recovery threshold, the company could capture the vast majority of early production revenues before any profit-sharing occurs, potentially delaying meaningful returns to the state.

Kenya has waited nearly 15 years to realise commercial production from the Turkana oil discovery.

The government views the project as strategically important for economic development and energy security, particularly given the country’s reliance on imported petroleum products.

However, the concessions granted to advance the project highlight the difficult trade-offs developing nations face when attempting to attract investment in capital-intensive extractive industries.

December 2, 2025
How IPPs Power Firms Rob Kenyans Blind In Fuel Tender Scam

Electricity consumers have over the years been overbilled owing to malpractices in the procurement of heavy fuel oil that thermal power producers use to generate electricity.

A forensic audit on the procurement of heavy fuel oil (HFO) by the thermal Independent Power Producers (IPPs) by the Auditor General shows that consumers paid billions of shillings over and above what they should have paid in compensating the power producers for what they used in acquiring the fuel.

The money that thermal IPPs spend on fuel is usually passed to consumers and is captured in the power bill as the Fuel Cost Charge (FCC). The charge has been blamed as among the factors that have sustained high power prices in the country.

The audit, covering the period between 2018 and 2021, unearthed instances where IPPs overlooked fuel suppliers with low bids and instead award contracts to those with higher bids, sometimes more than double what had been the lowest bid.

The higher costs were borne by consumers. They would also claim to have used higher amounts of fuel when billing Kenya Power while the actual consumption was lower.

Auditor General Nancy Gathungu now wants the IPPs penalised and also made to return the money that is deemed to have been surcharged on consumers irregularly.

At the same time, she has recommended action to be taken against Kenya Power staff mandated with overseeing HFO purchases among IPPs for failing to protect consumers.

Kenya Power, the report noted, has a responsibility of scrutinising the procurement of HFO by IPPs but failed to fulfil this mandate.

“The instances of irregularities warrant severe assessment of gross misconduct and action to be taken on the responsible parties,” said the Auditor General in the report that was recently presented to Parliament.

The forensic audit was triggered by the recommendations of the Presidential Task Force on the Review of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs).

The John Ngumi-chaired task force had raised alarm after review of the costs incurred by different thermal IPPs when buying HFO.

It noted a huge variance in the different players paid for the same commodity and purchased under near-similar conditions.

For instance, over 2019, the task force found out that one IPP would buy a tonne of HFO at $526 (Sh73,640 at current exchange rates) on average while another would buy the same at $1,037 (Sh145,180).

The task force recommended a forensic audit of HFO procurement by the IPPs over the five years to 2021 as well as closer supervision by Kenya Power of the power producers in their fuel procurement processes.

Fuel is among the major cost areas for Kenya Power, which paid Sh28 billion in the year to June 2022 to the different power producers operating thermal plants.

Among the areas of concern that the Auditor General identified following the forensic audit were instances where IPPs are claimed to have bought overpriced HFO.

According to the audit, three IPPs awarded separate tenders to Gulf Energy between 2013 and 2019 in which the firm had allegedly overpriced the HFO it sold to the power producers.

The result is that the electricity generators spent a combined Sh1.3 billion more than they would have spent had the IPPs worked with fuel suppliers that had offered the lowest bids. The cost was passed on to electricity consumers.

“Irregularities noted include the following… procurement award of the HFO supply tenders to Gulf Energy who were not the lowest bidders and without any justification led to losses that would have been avoided,” said the report.

Gulf Power, according to the report, incurred a loss of $2.93 million (Sh410 million at current exchange rates), Thika Power ($4.44 million – Sh616 million) and Triumph Power ($1.8 million – Sh252 million).

The report also noted that there was a conflict of interest in Gulf Power – the IPP – buying HFO from Gulf Energy – the oil marketing company – with Gulf Energy owning 80 per cent of Gulf Power when some of the tenders were awarded.

The Auditor General noted instances where Gulf Energy would be contracted to supply the fuel – not just to Gulf Power but also to other IPPs – even where there were other oil marketers that had bid at lower prices.

“In the case of the 2019 Thika Power Tender, Total and RH Devani were the lowest bidders but were disqualified. The tender evaluation report stated that the Gulf Energy bid was the lowest bidder, despite evidence to the contrary,” said the Auditor General.

“Gulf Power, Triumph Power and Thika Power should be held responsible for the losses occasioned through the procurement of more expensive HFO despite the availability of cheaper qualified fuel suppliers. Such actions should include recovery measures,”

“Action should be taken against KPLC staff tasked with oversight of the procurement process for failure to protect interests of electricity consumers in the irregular award of HFO supply tenders to Gulf Energy.”

The Auditor General also took issue with a claim for compensation of more than Sh1 billion by two oil marketers that were left holding huge stocks of HFO following a 2015 review of regulations.

In an April 2016 gazette notice, the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (then operating as the Energy Regulatory Commission) dropped requirements for IPPs to hold minimum HFO security stocks. This was supposed to ensure security of energy supply in the country.

KenGen had in 2015 commissioned a 280 megawatt (MW) geothermal plant that reduced dispatch from thermal power plants to 12 per cent from an earlier 33 per cent.

Hold huge stocks

This meant that IPPs no longer needed to hold huge stocks of HFO. According to the Auditor General, since the IPPs no longer had to tie this working capital, freeing up of the money that had been tied to the stocks benefited the companies but this was not passed on to consumers.

Instead, consumers had to pay fuel suppliers that were now stuck with huge stocks of HFO.

“Following the low dispatch in 2015 and 2016, Gulf Energy and Vivo Kenya who were the fuel suppliers for Kengen Kipevu III, Iberafrica, Gulf Power, Triumph Power, Thika Power and Tsavo Power wrote to ERC (which has since rebranded to Epra) claiming compensation of $9.75 million equivalent to Sh1.01 billion at an exchange rate of Sh103.67, citing additional financing costs,” noted the audit report.

“After deliberations, ERC approved the request and the amount was recovered from electricity consumers effective July 1, 2017. There was no justification for the payment.”

“There was also no basis for the fuel compensation since the Fuel Service Agreements were signed between the fuel suppliers and the IPPs and neither the government nor KPLC had guaranteed fuel uptake from the suppliers. All fuel orders from the IPPs were to be based on non-binding monthly estimates depending on the project energy dispatch levels.”

June 29, 2023
State Now Accuses Rubis Energy and Oil Marketers Association of Kenya (OMAK) for Smuggling Inn Of the 30,000MT of Oil.

A foreplay game that elite group of oil smugglers in Rubis Energy Ltd fraternity earlier on directed their gun towards their clande Gulf-energy Ltd of which Rubis owns the subsidiary Gulf-Energy Holdings Ltd.

Rubis Energy used Gulf energy Ltd as an escape goat for a deal gone sour and now some state officials involved are now distancing themselves to save their lucrative jobs. In a case of rumbling accomplices – friends in crime are turning enemies.

According to insider sources, the officials at the Ministry of Petroleum and Mining offered a safe veil of shield to invisible but well-connected team code-named “elite group” to facilitate clearance of the consignment at the Port of Mombasa.

Our sources also intimated the timing was also conducive to evade possible detection. Records show that the vessel, M/T Jag Prerana, was allowed to offload the fuel, worth billions of shillings, by officials from the Ministry of Petroleum following a request from oil marketer Gulf Energy despite the fact that it was not among the firms prequalified to bring in the commodity.

Joseph Wafula, Chief Economist at the Ministry of Petroleum directed clearance of the consignment upon payment of the requisite levies and taxes on December 30, 2021.Charles Nyakundi, Supply and Trading Manager at Gulf Energy had written to the ministry and the Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC) seeking clearance for the cargo to be offloaded.

Earlier on,

Appearing to be defending the cartels, Petroleum Principal Secretary Andrew Kamau said the petroleum products had been imported within the provisions of OTS.

He added that the issues that could have arisen may be due to misunderstanding of how the OTS works among some players or even differences among themselves.He explained that the cargo in dispute was part of a tender that Gulf Energy had won earlier.

The firm had requested the industry to allow it import in different batches.The 30,000 metric tonnes of super petrol was the second cargo.

“Once they have been awarded the OTS tender, the modalities of delivering the products is up to the marketer. It might be through one ship or multiple ships as long as the other oil markers are in agreement. A request to deliver in more than one batches is made during the vessel scheduling meeting (VSM), which in this case was done and approval given. The quantity and price however do not change,” he said, adding that the oil marketers – including members of Omak – had representation at the VSM meeting that gave the vessel Jag Prerana the go-ahead to discharge ahead of the others.

“I fail to understand the issues they are raising in the letter. Is it that they wanted to buy the fuel but denied the opportunity or that they did not want Gulf Energy to import?”

He said at the OTS, the government acts as the referee in overseeing the tendering process, adding that everything else is in the hands of the oil marketers. Omak also noted that the vessel that brought the fuel displaced other ships that should be discharging petroleum products at the Kipevu Oil Terminal. This could result in supply hiccups over the coming weeks.

Already there are reports of fuel shortage in the country. At the government-run oil facility, only one tanker can discharge at a time, and whenever vessels are waiting to discharge products, they penalise Kenyans by charging demurrage fees.

The Kenya Ports Authority is in the final stages of building a Sh40 billion floating terminal that will allow four vessels to discharge at a go, cutting demurrage charges.

“The vessel that should be discharging currently is the MT Sloane Square delivering gasoil and is now sitting outside while demurrage is accumulating, who will pay for this demurrage?” poses the association in the letter to PS Petroleum. It added that “Epra should not allow demurrage related to the next four vessels that have already arrived at the port of Mombasa be passed to the Kenyan consumers”.

Sloane Square, which has been waiting to discharge since December 13, is bringing in 86,000 metric tonnes of diesel. Other vessels that are queuing to offload are MT Front Future that has 85,000 metric tonnes of super petrol, MT Alpine Confidence (78,000 metric tonnes of jet fuel) and MT Apostolos II (86,000 metric tonnes of diesel).

Status Quo

The controversy over the importation of some 30,000 tonnes of petrol into the country over the festive season has escalated, with the State now accusing Rubis Energy and an oil marketers’ lobby of seeking to create an artificial shortage.

Making them the musketeers of this whole drama. Rubis Energy CEO Christian Bergeron and the Oil Marketers Association of Kenya (Omak) chairman Abdi Salaad last month wrote a protest letter to the Petroleum Ministry and the Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Epra) saying that importation and offloading of cargo was illegal having been done outside the Open Tender System (OTS).

But Principal Secretary for Petroleum Andrew Kamau dismissed their claims, saying they made the allegations in a bid to create an artificial shortage and trigger a security scare as motorists scampered for the limited supply of super, enough to last the anticipated outage.

“We are therefore surprised that even after attending the Vessel Scheduling Meeting (VSM) you chose to go public alleging that this was a private cargo/illegal cargo. This kind of insincerity is not only unfair but unacceptable,” Mr Kamau said in the letter.

“You alluded that the country was to face a stock out, which is dangerous and would cause panic buying and cause an artificial shortage.”

VSM are meetings where industry players and the regulator plan how different ships ferrying petroleum products are lined up at the port and allowed to discharge their cargo.Gulf Energy imported the 37.5 million litres of super petrol aboard vessel MT Jag Prarena.

The ministry says players had agreed on an emergency stock to avoid supply hitches due to increased demand over the Christmas and New Year festivities.

Rubis Energy and Omak said that the scheduling of the vessel delayed other ships that had been lined up to offload fuel and also led to an additional Sh100 million in demurrage costs — waiting fees for delayed ships.

Minutes of a Zoom meeting held on November 30, 2021 show that Rubis Energy attended the session where importation of the emergency stock of super petrol was part of the agenda.

The letter is also copied to Petroleum Secretary John Munyes, Epra, Kenya Pipeline Company, the Director of Criminal Investigations and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission. Rubis Energy had said that importation of super petrol contravened the terms and conditions of the OTS, a position that mirrored that of Omak.

“We therefore wish to express our dissatisfaction in the way the import was planned to give undue advantage to a few OMCs (oil marketing companies) which is contrary to the OTS terms and conditions,” Mr Bergerone said in the protest letter.

Kenya Pipeline Company, the State agency in charge of storing and distributing fuel, had last month warned of an erratic supply of super petrol in Nairobi and western Kenya due to a spike in demand over the festive period and power-related challenges on all its main lines.

Mr Kamau defended the decision to import the cargo, saying it was meant to avoid a similar incident in 2013 when an OMC tasked with importing jet fuel failed to ship in the product, a move that exposed the country’s air transport sector.

“The interest of the Kenyan people come first. It therefore requires a high degree of soberness to manage the oil industry today,” Mr Kamau added in the letter.

The Petroleum Act of 2009 outlaws private imports for refined petroleum products into the country and gives powers to the Ministry of Petroleum and Epra to oversee the importation of petroleum products through the OTS.

The system allows the lowest bidder on any given product to import on behalf of all the other oil marketing companies. The tiff pitting the ministry on one side against the French-owned Rubis Energy and Omak comes on the back of an industry meeting held last month where Total Energies, Vivo, Ola and Rubis Energy had reportedly requested additional stocks to meet a spike in demand during the festivities.

The letter looks set to put Rubis and Omak on a collision course with the State ahead of a planned industry meeting set for Tuesday and Wednesday next week where a review of the current OTS is top on the agenda.

“The ministry has scheduled a two days’ workshop for CEOs to be held on 25th to 26th January 2022 to review the current status of the Open Tender System (OTS) terms and conditions. This is therefore to invite you for this meeting,” Mr Kamau said in the letter.

Who are/were the owners of Gulf Energy and their Connection Political affiliation.

Suleiman Shahbal (right) with Raila Odinga (left)

Suleiman Shahbal (left) with President Uhuru Kenyatta (right)

In the takeover of Gulf Energy Holding Ltd. At least five Kenyans earned over one billion shillings in the total takeover of the Gulf Energy Holding company by the French multinational Rubis Energie .

Rubis disclosed in its 2019 annual financial results that it spent Sh9.72 billion in acquiring Gulf Energy Holdings Limited Kenya a subsidiary of Gulf Energy.

Mombasa Gubernatorial aspirant Suleiman Shabal was the CEO of Gulf Energy and the Founder Chairman of the Gulf African Bank earned an estimated Sh2.4 billion from the deal. Shahbal had a 25% stake in the Gulf Energy through his company, Monte Carlo Investments Limited, records from the Registrar of Companies shows.

Francis Koome Njogu, was the Managing Director of Gulf Energy is estimated to have earned Sh1.9 billion from his 20% stake in the company. Njogu is a businessman and owner of Alba Hotel, in Meru town. Duncan King’ori Mukira who earned Sh1.2 billion from his 12.5% stake and Paul Kiprotich Limoh, a similar amount from a similar shareholding.

The rest of the 25% stake in Gulf Energy Holdings which also earned an estimated Sh2.4 billion was owned through a company called Nama Kenya Limited, a U.K registered company that is a minority (20%) owned by a Kenyan named Ahmed Said Bajaber, who is a director at the Gulf African Bank.

Gulf Energy is a diversified energy company in East Africa. On its website, it notes the following.

“We source, charter, export, retail and store quality petroleum products from all over the world to various destinations in East Africa.”

The deal was first announced in November 2019 but was given final approval on February 25th by the Competition Authority .

January 20, 2022
Mystery Behind Rubis Energy Cartels and their Local Kenyan Elite Class Accomplices Who smuggled Inn 30,000MT of Oil into Mombasa Port.

Just like Covid19 Sputnik-V was smuggled into the country by the Healthcare sector Cabals, —Gulf Energy Ltd is reported to had sneaked inn 30,000 MT of Oil, with the knowledge of the ‘big boys’ and deliberately creating fuel crisis to hike prices as a ‘retaliation’ to ‘market demand’ —maximizing profit and minimizing losses but unfortunately their 40 days was long overdue before executing the plan of which would have been the biggest exploitation heist in the Petroleum industry history in Kenya and perhaps the whole world.

The cargo —30,000 MT of oil, which was shipped in during the festive season last year 2021, was to see other marketers run out of stock leading to higher fuel prices once Sh100 million ($1 million) in additional charges incurred is passed over to Kenyans. The oil marketing companies (OMCs) who whistle blown the heist, accused the ‘big boys’ of bypassing a legal requirement that tenders for importation of refined petroleum products must be publicly advertised of which in this case wasn’t done.

The ship carrying the product was reported to have docked at the port of Mombasa on December 30 and offloaded until Sunday, January 2, while four vessels that had reportedly gone through legal importation process were kept waiting, incurring about Sh100 million in demurrage charges.

In protest letters to Petroleum and Mining Principal Secretary Andrew Kamau, Rubis Energy and Oil Marketers Association of Kenya (Omak) said the private importation was made by Gulf Energy on behalf of a few other marketers. Of which poses the question as to Why is Rubis Energie the complainant when it acquired Kenol Kobil which had acquired Gulf Energy? Is it to hoodwink the public?

From insights, Gulf Energy was not acquired by Rubis Energy Ltd. They bought assets (stations & depots) from Gulf Energy. These were put under Gulf Energy Holdings Ltd. Gulf Energy Ltd continues operating independently. But this is simple “distancing”..

Rubis abnormally continues to sell fuel at lower price than even the Government’s subsidised National oil. It goes without saying that the idea is to shut up other dealers in the country hence creating a monopoly the Kenyatta family’s milk business, known LPG Cartel, Rai family in the sugar market.

The December 31st letter, also copied to Cabinet Secretary John Munyes, Director of Criminal Investigations George Kinoti, Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission CEO Twalib Mbarak and Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Epra) Director-General Daniel Kiptoo, said the conduct risked sowing acrimony in the oil industry.

The demurrage charges accumulated with regard to the delayed vessels would likely be passed over to consumers, adding onto the already high fuel prices.

In his letter, Rubis CEO Jean-Christian Bergerone hypocritically indicated that the “illegal” importation had affected the petroleum industry. He also proposed that the cargo be shared by all the marketers.

Since 2020, what used to be Gulf Energy and Kenol Kobil have been trading under the brand of Rubis Energy, following an acquisition that left Rubis controlling 20 per cent of Kenya’s oil market, effectively becoming the largest oil marketer.

Rubis spent about Sh2.4 billion to rebrand Kenol Kobil and Gulf Energy. Mr Bergerone back then indicated that the marketer aimed to have rebranded a total of 250 outlets by this year.

Rubis Energy plans to be a fully stand-alone brand in Kenya by end of this year 2022. It began rebranding 190 KenolKobil outlets and Gulf Energy’s 46 petrol stations in the country.

The combined share now puts Rubis ahead of another French owned oil and gas brand Total, which has a 16.3 per cent share, and Vivo Energy, which enjoys a 16.1 markets share.

Meanwhile, the global firm is counting on its strengths in the aviation industry, LPG combined with petroleum products to cement its position in Kenya.

Rubis enjoys the lion share of JetA1 (Jet fuel) sales in Kenya, fuelling 50 per cent of airlines landing at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport and the Moi International Airport in Mombasa. The country’s petroleum industry is among the most competitive in the region, with about 62 established oil marketing companies having presence in Kenya, mainly urban areas.

There are also hundreds of independent oil dealers across the country, mainly served by the major OMCs who import bulk fuel products through the Port of Mombasa.

The big players work closely with Kenya Pipeline Company for hullage to Nairobi and distribution to their respective storage facilities around the Industrial Area, before serving their respective service stations.

French oil firm Rubis Energy said it had to contend with a major loss of aviation business following the near shutdown of the industry between March and August. This followed the outbreak of Covid-19. In what we believe could have been a retaliatory act of smuggling inn the oil to compensate for the loss.

Before the acquisition, KenolKobil accounted for 15.4 per cent market share in the country, while Gulf had a 5.8 per cent share. The company said it has so far rebranded 30 of the 230 outlets to Rubis. It expects to complete the process in 2022. After the acquisition, Rubis market share as of December last year went up to 21 per cent in comparison to the then market leader, Total, which had 16.4 per cent followed by Vivo (16.2 per cent).

KenolKobil was dominant in the jet fuel market, controlling about 68 per cent of the market then, which was pushed to about 71 per cent after merging its operations with those of Gulf Energy.

Who owns Rubis?

It is known, Rubis Energy is a French company but it’s not known who in Kenya is the dirty deal controller of the company.

From this article, you’ll have to connect the dots as we cannot ascertain but we have the lead.

Smuggling inn 30000MT of oil into the country without local authority under payroll as accomplices of the giant international company is mission impossible. Rubis seems to be an international shell company for money laundering. Publicized Board of Management might just be tip of the Iceberg and Money laundering series Ozark can attest to that by the way.

The cartel Accomplices can however be traced in Kenya from the operators of the Kenolkobil and Gulf energy in lias with Kenya Ports Authority officials, Petroleum and Mining ministry, Kenya Pipeline Company, Epra and Politicians.

In their website it states, “Founded in 1990, Rubis is an independent French operator specializing in three business areas: The distribution of petroleum products (service station networks, commercial fuel oil, aviation fuel, LPG, bitumens, etc.), with operations in Europe, the Caribbean and Africa through our subsidiary Rubis Énergie; Support and services, alongside our downstream petroleum products distribution activity, with a midstream position, grouping together refining, trading-supply and shipping operations; Storage through our subsidiary Rubis Terminal, providing storage of liquid products for our customers (petroleum, chemical and agri-food products). Rubis Terminal is a leader in France and also holds operations in the Netherlands, Belgium and Turkey. Since 2000, Rubis has expanded its presence across three regions, (Africa, Europe and the Caribbean) through direct investments and acquisitions. The Group has enjoyed strong, regular progress driven by organic growth, new sites and acquisitions, while also constantly improving its productivity. Rubis is now a major player in the fuels distribution business in Kenya. In March 2019, the company acquired the assets owned and operated by KenolKobil PLC, and later Gulf Energy Holdings in November 2019. The acquisitions meant that Rubis becomes a formidable competitor in the regional downstream business. Rubis Energy Kenya runs a strong network of over 230 strategically and conveniently located service stations countrywide under the Gulf Energy, Kenol, Kobil and Rubis brands. Our stations are designed for maximum convenience and safety, with focus on value-added service at the forecourt.”

Who are/were the owners of Gulf Energy and their Connection Political affiliation.

In the takeover of Gulf Energy Holding Ltd. At least five Kenyans earned over one billion shillings in the total takeover of the Gulf Energy Holding company by the French multinational Rubis Energie .

Rubis disclosed in its 2019 annual financial results that it spent Sh9.72 billion in acquiring Gulf Energy Holdings Limited Kenya a subsidiary of Gulf Energy.

Mombasa Gubernatorial aspirant Suleiman Shabal was the CEO of Gulf Energy and the Founder Chairman of the Gulf African Bank earned an estimated Sh2.4 billion from the deal. Shahbal had a 25% stake in the Gulf Energy through his company, Monte Carlo Investments Limited, records from the Registrar of Companies shows.

Suleiman Shahbal (right) with Raila Odinga (left)

Suleiman Shahbal (left) with President Uhuru Kenyatta (right)

Francis Koome Njogu, was the Managing Director of Gulf Energy is estimated to have earned Sh1.9 billion from his 20% stake in the company. Njogu is a businessman and owner of Alba Hotel, in Meru town.

Duncan King’ori Mukira who earned Sh1.2 billion from his 12.5% stake and Paul Kiprotich Limoh, a similar amount from a similar shareholding. The rest of the 25% stake in Gulf Energy Holdings which also earned an estimated Sh2.4 billion was owned through a company called Nama Kenya Limited, a U.K registered company that is a minority (20%) owned by a Kenyan named Ahmed Said Bajaber, who is a director at the Gulf African Bank.

Gulf Energy is a diversified energy company in East Africa. On its website, it notes the following.

“We source, charter, export, retail and store quality petroleum products from all over the world to various destinations in East Africa. The deal was first announced in November 2019 but was given final approval on February 25th by the Competition Authority of Kenya.

There could a possibility that Gulf-energy being the victim of the expose was a shell of Rubis in this case. Gulf energy Might have been an escape goat plan should the heist go sour as it has.

Rubis is an International brand and cant afford to be mud-slang in any way hence getting vulnarable to their enemies like Total Energy and Vivo Energy in Kenya and the international market at large.

January 10, 2022
Fuel Sneaked Into The Country By Gulf Energy To Cost Kenyans Dearly

Oil marketers are outraged over what they termed illegal importation of 30,000 metric tonnes of petrol by a group of industry players.

They said the cargo, which was allegedly shipped in during the festive season, may see other marketers run out of stock and lead to higher fuel prices once Sh100 million ($1 million) in additional charges incurred is passed over to Kenyans.

The oil marketing companies (OMCs) accuse the “elite” group of bypassing a legal requirement that tenders for importation of refined petroleum products must be publicly advertised.

They allege that the importers quietly shipped in the product as Christmas and New Year festivities kept people busy.

The ship(MT Jag Prarena) carrying the product is reported to have docked at the port of Mombasa on December 30 and offloaded until Sunday, January 2, while four vessels that had reportedly gone through legal importation process were kept waiting, incurring about Sh100 million in demurrage charges, according to a source.

In protest letters to Petroleum and Mining Principal Secretary Andrew Kamau, Rubis Energy and Oil Marketers Association of Kenya (Omak) said the private importation was made by Gulf Energy on behalf of a few other marketers.

Illegal importation

“We note with great concern the illegal importation of 30,000MT of Gasoline by Gulf Energy Ltd for an “elite” group of oil marketers without the knowledge of all the other OMCs. We wish to further note that the timing for both arrival and discharge of the cargo is not only suspect but was meant to never have been found out due to the festivities. Unfortunately this has been discovered,” says a letter by Omak Chairman Abdi Ali Salaad addressed to PS Kamau.

The December 31 letter, also copied to Cabinet Secretary John Munyes, Director of Criminal Investigations George Kinoti, Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission CEO Twalib Mbarak and Energy and Petroleum Regulatory Authority (Epra) Director-General Daniel Kiptoo, said the conduct risked sowing acrimony in the oil industry.

“We request the relevant government bodies to investigate and make public answers to the following questions: When was the cargo tendered for and, through which medium was it tendered that all our members did not get to know about it, neither got an opportunity to participate in the sharing of the cargo? How was one OMC, Gulf Energy Limited, considered to deliver the cargo without going through the normal tender process? Who are the beneficiaries of the cargo?” the Omak chairman asked.

The association further complained that a vessel that was supposed to be discharging refined oil at the time was stuck as the one that was privately shipping in offloaded its refined oil.

They said the demurrage charges accumulated with regard to the delayed vessels would likely be passed over to consumers, adding onto the already high fuel prices.

“With this recklessness we are left with no choice other than to institute a legal suit against all the concerned parties,” Omak warned.

The association wants the Petroleum and Mining ministry, Kenya Pipeline Company and Epra to direct that the cargo be shared by all OMCs using the usual ullage formula. They have also called for suspension of the concerned marketers from the open tendering system for importation of oil.

Four vessels

“Epra should not allow demurrage related to the next four vessels that have already arrived at the port of Mombasa to be passed over to the Kenyan consumers,” Mr Salaad asked.

But in a tactical response four days later, on Monday, Rubis Energy – which acquired Gulf Energy in 2019 – also wrote to Mr Kamau with similar complaints.

In his letter, Rubis CEO Jean-Christian Bergerone also indicated that the “illegal” importation had affected the petroleum industry. He also proposed that the cargo be shared by all the marketers.

“Discharge of this cargo has pushed forward access of already firmed-up PMS cargoes by five days, which exposes the industry to a PMS stock-out given the already constrained PMS stock position. For equity purposes, therefore, we request that the cargo be shared (by) all OMCs to mitigate an imminent PMS stock-out,” Mr Bergerone said.

“We confirm that indeed the industry is constrained on PMS and it is, therefore, quite unfortunate that a cargo would be planned for discharge into the common user facility without the knowledge of industry players. Needless to mention the disregard on the impact of delayed product access on already planned cargoes to other OMCs and the compounded demurrage effect on all vessels whose berthing would be delayed,” he added.

“Importing cargo that favours only a few OMCs is not only suspect but creates disharmony among industry players, unfair competition and exposes Jet A-1 players to excessive demurrage, which is not compensated through the pump by Epra,” he said.

Since 2020, what used to be Gulf Energy and Kenol Kobil have been trading under the brand of Rubis Energy, following an acquisition that left Rubis controlling 20 per cent of Kenya’s oil market, effectively becoming the largest oil marketer.

Rubis spent about Sh2.4 billion to rebrand Kenol Kobil and Gulf Energy.

Mr Bergerone back then indicated that the marketer aimed to have rebranded a total of 250 outlets by this year.

Omak also noted that the vessel that brought the fuel displaced other ships that should be discharging petroleum products at the Kipevu Oil Terminal. This could result in supply hiccups over the coming weeks.

At the government-run oil facility, only one tanker can discharge at a time, and whenever vessels are waiting to discharge products, they penalise Kenyans by charging demurrage fees.

The Kenya Ports Authority is in the final stages of building a Sh40 billion floating terminal that will allow four vessels to discharge at a go, cutting demurrage charges. “The vessel that should be discharging currently is the MT Sloane Square delivering gasoil and is now sitting outside while demurrage is accumulating, who will pay for this demurrage?” poses the association in the letter to PS Petroleum.

It added that “Epra should not allow demurrage related to the next four vessels that have already arrived at the port of Mombasa be passed to the Kenyan consumers”.

Sloane Square, which has been waiting to discharge since December 13, is bringing in 86,000 metric tonnes of diesel. Other vessels that are queuing to offload are MT Front Future that has 85,000 metric tonnes of super petrol, MT Alpine Confidence (78,000 metric tonnes of jet fuel) and MT Apostolos II (86,000 metric tonnes of diesel).

In a report to the National Assembly following a probe into the high cost of fuel in the country, the Finance and National Planning Committee said different vessel owners were paid Sh1.3 billion in demurrage charges between January and August 2021.

Source.

January 5, 2022