Tag: Former Cabinet Minister Chris Okemo

  • Mr Money Bags: Deals That Built Ex-Kenya Power Boss Gichuru An Empire

    Mr Money Bags: Deals That Built Ex-Kenya Power Boss Gichuru An Empire

    There is a long tradition of making money in this citadel. It has a story perfected through years of filth – no arrests and no convictions.

    As it turned out later, when Mr. Gichuru was the head of the utility, mostly during the Moi years, he gave himself up as a of consultants for the companies who apply for large projects in the company he leads. He wasn’t the only one in the chain of theft that plagued the company.

    Barons in the energy sector took the cue and easy to learn from the best in the game of sleaze in the energy sector. Insiders say that Mr. Gichuru did not work alone but did his business with the full knowledge of President Moi, who also built his own financial empire.

    Fight in local courts

    The story of how Mr. Gichuru and Moi’s Treasury Secretary Chris Okemo were involved in an intricate network of frauds is now included in court files filed on Jersey Island where they are supposed to answer money laundering allegations of extradition.

    In Kenyan power and in the Moi political elite, Mr. Gichuru was simply Mr. Moneybags and today reflects the kind of filth that took place within parastatal power.

    Winning tenders

    When Mr. Gichuru founded the Windward Trading Company, which he registered in the Jersey offshore port, he never knew he would be exposed.

    Finally, it had separate dir ctors who pretend to be the owner. He also had the blessing of Finance Minister Mr. Okemo.

    We know from court records that both Mr. Gichuru and Mr. Okemo ran a complicated web where foreign companies could win tenders and contracts with Kenya Power – guaranteed by the Treasury – and in return would pay “consulting fees” to Mr. Gichuru’s Windward Trading Company, which had an offshore account in Jersey. He later paid into an account owned by Mr. Okemo.

    For example, when John Brown Engineering received a tender to install a gas turbine for Kenya Power’s Kipevu power plant, it claimed in court that Windward was Windward. paid £ 451,037 (Sh68m at current exchange rate).

    When this turbine failed, the company was asked to install a new one and paid Mr. Gichuru’s Windward an additional £ 386,000 (Sh58.3m) “Come back in for this business.”

    Mr. Gichuru was able to protect his real wealth from public scrutiny – until a treasure trove of documents revealed how he siphoned off money through contracts.

    Part of that information came to light when Mr. Gichuru’s ex-wife, Salome Njeri, filed for divorce demanding a stake in the family’s Sh20 billion empire. Njeri has since died.

    The court records show that Mr. Gichuru not only controlled a billion-shilling empire, but also had accounts in Jersey on which he disguised funds from Kenya power kickbacks as advisory fees hidden.

    Ewaso Ng’ro hydropower

    About 20 years ago the British House of Commons began to investigate what happened to around 8.2 billion shredders that Kenya had for the Ewaso Ng ” iro hydropower plant. They found that the feasibility study – which was part of the loan – diverted money to Mr. Gichuru’s Jersey account for a project that never got rolling.

    A tradition of sleaze projects has been established at KP for ages and has never been broken. During Mr. Gichuru’s tenure, most of the filth was conducting dam feasibility studies, most of which were never completed.

    That included building mega-dams such as the Turkwel project , in which high-ranking government officials benefited from the French bribes thanks to excessive costs.

    For example, a study team from the World Bank reported in 1992 that the feasibility study for the British company Knight Piesold for the Ewaso. Ng’iro dams cost “five times what such services would normally cost”.

    This was true for three dams, which by 2007 were worth $ 350 million should be built. The Ewaso Ng’iro Dam scandal prompted the UK government to investigate Mr. Gichuru and Mr. Okemo.

    In order to pay bribes to Gichurus Windward Trading Company, Knight Piesold initially received US $ 15.3 million -Dollars in advance from KP, although the dam was not dismantled 10 years later.

    The Ewaso Ng’iro Dam never came about, so the Kenyan taxpayers had to pay a loan for a non-existent project. But Mr. Gichuru and the people he represented had made their money.

    Kenya Power remained 14 reports produced between 1991 and 1993, with each report costing an average of $ 2.7 million. This means that the feasibility studies alone cost the Kenyan taxpayers 3.8 billion Sh. of which, according to court records, they paid Mr. Gichuru’s corporate consultancy fees.

    Blind eyes to corruption

    That was at a time when the UK Export Credit Guarantee Department (ECGD) had its job was to help British companies find and win tenders abroad, has been criticized for turning a blind eye to corruption in several developing countries.

    Once nicknamed the Shady Business Department ECGD caught the attention of Transparency International and other lobby groups for failing to tame bribes.

    This department had, on June 21, 1990, endorsed a £ 68.1 million loan between the ANZ Grindlays Bank and the Moi government – and which on paper should serve to finance the contract between KPLC and Knight Piesold.

    As emerged from court files, part of this Ge This was diverted to Jersey Island, where Mr Gichuru had opened some secret accounts in 198 6 with the help of Deloitte & Touche, a Jersey accounting firm.

    When the British tried to extradite Mr Gichuru, an official from Knight Piesold admitted later announced in an affidavit: “It was impossible to work in Kenya without paying a commission to important political figures. It was like a tax. “

    ”Ritter Piesold paid such commissions to various people. Without this we would never have been able to work there. One person we paid was Samuel (Gichuru), “said Mr. Peter Garrat, an officer at Knight Piesold, in the extradition papers.

    Mr. Gichuru worked for KP for many years and had found a way his dream projects. He would contact a UK bank, which would then ask the ECGD to guarantee the bank would pay off the loan.

    The Energy Secretary and the Treasury Secretary in Kenya would then sign guarantees and the appropriate government the bank would then use the loan to pay off the hired British company. Mr. Gichuru would then receive his commission as a consultant.

    Jersey records show that Knight Piesold transferred Mr. Gichuru and Mr. Okemo’s commissions through a company called Camargo. This was “justified by vague bills … dictated by KP”.

    Once Camargo received the money, it would deduct 2 percent and transfer the balance to Mr. Gichuru Windward and Okemo’s accounts – hoping that it would never be found.

    Although Gichuru was the MD of Kenya Power, he also posed as the agent of Knight Piesold and charged them agent fees for any contracts they received. The records indicate that every time Knight Piesold was paid by Kenya Power, Mr. Gichuru’s excessive brokerage fee was later passed on to Kenya Power.

    “This evidence is supported by the records that show that most of the payments to Gichuru and Windward came after KP was paid millions of pounds … related to a hydropower project called Ewaso Ng’iro and that commissions were included in the consulting fees, “court records show.

    In his case, Mr Okemo is said to have opened his bank accounts on the way to Finland to meet officials from Wartsila, a Swedish energy company. Then Mr. Okemo gave them a letter of commitment. Mr Okemo was the new finance minister at the time and had participated in negotiations with Wartsila when he was Moi’s energy minister. According to the court records, only Mr. Okemo was authorized to give Wartsila the papers they needed to move the project forward. If the project were approved, Windward – or rather, Mr. Gichuru – would also receive the consulting fee.

    In all of these deals hundreds of millions were marked by projects carried out by KP, but they were hidden from review.

    Court records also show that Mr. Gichuru, as managing director of the energy company, disguised himself as a broker and advisor. They show that at various points in time between 1986 and 2002, Windward had received payments of 5.4 million (Sh. 102 million) from various companies under contract with KP.

    The records state that Mr. Gichuru part of the 2.1 billion Sh. for his “personal expenses” while Mr. Okemo kept the money in his Jersey accounts before investing it with “recognized financial institutions”.

    But the overthrow of the Kanu regime had most of the Nyayo -Hemi gods exposed. When the Mwai Kibaki government began persecuting some members of the Nyayo-era web of filth, Mr. Gichuru decided to pursue the billions he had in Jersey and hide them elsewhere.

    Loud Record of his case in Jersey was after a Deloitte-owned trust company, Walbrook Trustees (Jersey) Limited, filed a suspicious transaction report on his company in May 2002.

    The company hired Mr. Gichuru then directors available while he was in the shade.

    Hide cash

    After Mr. Gichuru realized that the British were after him, he tried to put some of the cash in an in Hiding Gibraltar based company Argus Management Services. For example, Mr. Gichuru’s Windward transferred $ 150,030 to Argus on May 18, 2001.

    But when the directors of Windward Trading were sued for money laundering in a Jersey court, they surprised Mr. Gichuru when she pleaded guilty and by surprise Mr. Gichuru’s more than Sh520 million confiscated.

    Mr. Gichuru had told a court in Jersey in another case that he was the beneficial owner of the company – and not the directors, and so it turned out found that KP’s cash flow was through various contracts.

    Mr. Gichuru lost his case in Jersey after the judge ruled that he “accepted bribes from overseas companies that contracted [Kenya Power] had completed the office and hid them in Jersey. (Windward) knowingly enabled Gichuru to receive substantial bribes while serving in public office in Kenya. The company played a crucial role, without which corruption on a large scale is impossible: money laundering. ”

    When Parliament started investigating KP and a forensic report called the Nyanja Report was presented, Mr Gichuru – the disadvantageously named – went to the High Court, which annulled the report on July 28, 2005.

    When MP asked Sammy Weya what would become of the forensic study, he was told it was null and void.

    No evidence …’

    Mwangi Kiunjuri, a deputy energy minister, told Parliament that the KP board had also attacked forensic auditors Ernst and Young for “alleged check fraud “Commissioned. However, it turned out that there was no evidence of the alleged fraud. ”

    Although he said criminal cases had been turned over to the Kenyan Anti-Corruption Commission, none of the barons within KP were ever prosecuted.

    After Mr. Gichuru’s departure, KP never ceased to be the playground of the cartels; Instead, it became the place for big projects and easy money. Soon the dams began to dry up and the coffers were empty. Some new Mr. Moneybags had taken it over.

    After a long battle and playing with the courts, Gichuru’s worst fears has happened with Supreme Court allowing for his extradition to the UK together with his partner Okemo to face the money laundering and theft charges.

  • End Of The Road: How Okemo And Gichuru Played The Courts For Years

    End Of The Road: How Okemo And Gichuru Played The Courts For Years

    The Supreme Court in Nairobi delivered a landmark ruling on the extradition to Jersey Island of Chrysanthus Barnabas Okemo and Samuel Kimunchu Gichuru.

    Mr. Okemo served as the Minister for Energy in the Kenya Government between 1999 and 2001 and Gichuru was the managing director of the Kenya Power and lighting Company got decades.

    The ruling, delivered by Chief Justice Martha Koome, and Supreme Court judges Ibrahim Mohammed, Smokin Wanjala and Njoki Ndungu revealed legal loopholes that the duo used to evade court processes.

    How It All Started

    Okemo and Gichuru came under the radar of investigative authorities after allegations that the duo accepted bribes from foreign businesses that contracted with KPLC and hid the money in Jersey.

    The duo managed to evade suspicion by having the contractors pay the dirty money into the bank accounts of a Jersey company called Windward Trading Limited.

    The offshore company named Gichuru, the KPLC Director as the beneficial owner, but
    he controlled it through proxies.

    He ensured the money was deposited in the bank account of the company and routed under discrete instructions to personal accounts of Okemo and Gichuru in Jersey.

    1′ July, 1999: When the matter was hatched, Okemo was charged in the Royal Court of Jersey with thirteen counts relating to the transactions in the accounts committed in the Island of Jersey under Jersey law.

    On the other hand, Gichuru is charged in the same court with forty counts for offenses allegedly committed under Jersey law in the Island of Jersey between 1991 and 28 June, 2002.

    26th May 2011. The Attorney General of the Island of Jersey wrote a letter requesting Kenya’s then-Attorney General, Amos Wako, to commence extradition proceedings against the two Applicants.

    While the letter was addressed to the Attorney General of Kenya, the authority to commence the extradition proceedings was in fact given by the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) and Miscellaneous Application No.g of 2011 filed in the Chief Magistrates’ Court at Nairobi to commence the said proceedings.

    The previously mentioned letter was received on 6th June 2011, 10 years later, and constituted a request for the extradition of Okemo and Gichuru from the Attorney-General of Jersey through Verbal note number 452/11 through the British High Commission in Nairobi.

    The Attorney-General forwarded the extradition request to the Director of Public prosecutions for his consideration and action.

    ISSUANCE OF “AUTHORITY TO PROCEED”

    The Director of Public Prosecutions issued an “Authority to Proceed” to the Chief Magistrate pursuant to the provisions of section 7(1) of the Extradition Act.

    The extradition Cause was allocated Nairobi Chief Magistrate’s Court Miscellaneous Application No. 9 of 2011. Subsequently, the applicants appeared in court and the extradition proceedings were ready to commence.

    OBJECTIONS TO THE EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS

    Moments before the proceedings, Okemo and Gichuru filed a Notice of Preliminary Objection/Grounds of Objection dated in July 2011 and filed in court on 8 July 2011.

    In addition to the Notice of Preliminary Objection the duo filed Constitutional Petitions in the High Court being Petition numbers 90 and q1 both of 2011 which were subsequently renumbered Petition numbers 320/2011 and 321/2011 respectively.

    However, the objections were dismissed in a Ruling delivered on 5th February 2013.

    The two later filed a Constitutional application by way of an Originating Notice of Motion being Application against the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Chief Magistrate’s Court.

    The application was indicated as brought pursuant to Article 165(6) & (7) together with section 19 of the sixth Schedule of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 as well as Rule 2 of the Chief Justice Rules 2006.

    The High Court Constitutional Application was however thrown out by Justice Isaac Lenaola on 18th December 2015.

    APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEAL

    The duo then ran to the Court of Appeal (Civil Appeals Nos. 5 of 2016 and 23 of 2016) respectively.

    This time, Hon. E.M. Githinji, H.M. Okwengu and J. Mohammed, JJA.) granted their request.

    “The order of the High Court dated 18′ December 2015 declaring the committal proceedings to be valid and the order of the extradition magistrate dated 5′ February 2013 requiring the committal proceedings to commence are set aside and in lieu thereof the committal proceedings are declared invalid and are hereby struck out.”

    The DPP, having not been satisfied with the decision. The office then lodged their appeal to the supreme court of Kenya.

    SUMMARY OF THE GROUNDS FOR APPEAL & THE PETITION TO

    THE SUPREME COURT OF KENYA

    In the ruling delivered, the Supreme court faulted the lower courts for thwarting extradition proceedings.

    “The Learned Judges erred in law in holding that the extradition proceedings instituted against the first and the second respondents without written authority to proceed issued by the AG are a nullity in law including any act done by the magistrate against the appellant in pursuant of such proceedings. Pursuant to this ruling, the OPP shall take steps to expedite the extradition proceedings before the sub-ordinate court as directed by the Supreme Court.”

  • Court Okays Extradition Of Gichuru And Okemo To The UK

    Court Okays Extradition Of Gichuru And Okemo To The UK

    The Supreme Court has overturned a decision by the Court of Appeal stopping the extradition of Former Cabinet Minister Chris Okemo and former Kenya Power boss Samuel Gichuru to Jersey Island to face trial.

    In a majority decision delivered Friday, the country’s highest court determined that the case facing the two is criminal in nature and that the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) is free to initiate the repatriation proceedings given that it is legally mandated to handle the case.

    The judges had been called upon to determine whether it is the Attorney General or the Director of Public Prosecutions to initiate and conduct Extradition Proceedings.

    “It follows that the ‘Authority to proceed’ issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions on 6th July 2011 was valid.” The judges ruled

    In the judgment, the judges further ordered that “the Proceedings before the Magistrates Court which had been triggered by the Authority to Proceed issued on 6th July 2011 by the Director of Public Prosecutions are to continue forthwith on a priority basis either in the same court or court of competent jurisdiction,”

    The three Supreme Court judges in favor are Chief Justice Martha Koome, and Justices Mohamed Ibrahim and Smokin Wanjala. Justice Njoki Ndungu concurred while Justice William Ouko dissented.

    They said the fact that Extradition Proceedings are criminal in nature, divests the Attorney General of any authority to involve him/herself in their initiation. In their opinion, however, the AG retains the Executive Authority to receive Requests for Extradition and to transmit the same to the Director of Public Prosecutions for necessary action.

    They said under the current constitutional dispensation, the powers to prosecute any conduct of a criminal nature is the exclusive preserve of the Director of Public Prosecutions.

    While dissenting, Justice Wiliam Ouko noted that extradition proceedings are special international legal proceedings based on reciprocity and originating from bilateral and multilateral treaties and agreements between nations, making them matters of international relations that involve the exercise of ministerial or executive responsibility.

    “I come to the conclusion that extradition is not criminal in nature but sui generis, and that the Director of Public Prosecutions has no powers to issue ‘Authority to proceed’ or institute extradition proceedings under the Extradition (Commonwealth Countries) Act or any law, as he did in this matter.

    On her part, Justice Ndungu held the view that extradition proceedings are quasi-criminal in nature, having elements of both criminal and administrative law. She says while on one hand, they commence as foreign policy issues, on the other hand, they conclude as criminal processes.

    “They give equal but complementary roles to both the Attorney General and the Director of Public Prosecutions, with each office required to play its part in the sequence of events that in totality amount to an act of extradition.” She said

    All the judges were however in agreement that the case had taken unnecessarily too long to resolve having commenced over ten years ago.

    “After several false starts, this Appeal was finally heard and concluded before the Court on 21st October 2021.”

    “It is indeed a matter of grave concern to this Court that a case as fundamental, revolving around a critical constitutional question, as this one, has been stuck in our justice system for over ten years for it to be finally resolved! Such dalliance with the exacting demands of justice is neither testimony to our judicial rigour, nor to Kenya’s commitment to its international obligations.” The said

    It is alleged that Okemo and Gichuru accepted bribes from foreign businesses that contracted with KPLC and his the money in Jersey by causing the foreign contractors to make payments into the bank accounts of a Jersey company called Windward Trading Limited.

    On April 20, 2011, a court in Jersey issued a warrant for the arrest of Okemo and Gichuru over alleged theft and money laundering charges.

    But the two successfully challenged their extradition to the British Isle with the court of appeal ruling in their favour in 2018. The ruling by the Court of Appealed had quashed a High Court Judgment made in 2015 that allowed authorities to extradite them.