Kenya Insights

Tag: DP Rigathi Gachagua

  • Gachagua Impeached As Kenya’s Deputy President

    Gachagua Impeached As Kenya’s Deputy President

    Senators have voted to impeach the Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua Thursday evening after approving five of the 11 charges levelled against him in the historic impeachment motion.

    Before undertaking the vote, Senate Speaker Amason Kingi directed senators to vote on all 11 charges, noting that the threshold to move the motion needed 45 senators to vote in favor for the charge.

    “Honerable senators, these are the guidelines on how we are going to move forward: All Senators are eligible to cast their votes, the threshold is 45 senators and we are going to vote for the charges separately. So we are going to vote 11 times.” Senate Speaker directed.

    The development coming after 281 Members of the National Assembly voted to impeach the Deputy President following a motion tabled by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse.

    The motion by Mutuse laid 11 grounds for DP Gachagua’s ouster ranging from gross violations of the constitution and other laws such as the Anti-Corruption and Economic Crimes Act, the Proceeds of Crime and Anti-Money Laundering Act, the Leadership and Integrity Act and the National Cohesion and Integration Act.

    DP Gachagua was expected to appear before Senate as a witness for cross examination but was taken ill, Thursday afternoon.

    He is currently undergoing treatment at Karen Hospital, where he is reported to be suffering from intense chest pains.

    Senior Counsel Paul Muite urged the Senate to postpone the proceedings until Tuesday, citing Gachagua’s health condition and the need for the Deputy President to physically present his defense.

    However, Senate resolved to continue with the impeachment proceedings against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua despite his lawyer’s request for an adjournment to allow him time to recover and appear in person.

    The Speaker of the Senate Amason Kingi ruled that the adjournment request must be decided by the Senate and not unilaterally by the Speaker calling upon the Majority Leader to move a motion to adjourn to Saturday, October 19.

    Lawyers representing the National Assembly opposed the adjournment, insisting that the trial should proceed in accordance with Senate rules, even in the absence of the Deputy President.

    They argued that Gachagua had the option of being represented or submitting documents, as permitted by Senate standing orders.

    The motion to adjourn was, however, defeated after a majority of senators declined to support it.

    Speaker Kingi emphasised the Senate’s obligation to adhere to constitutional timelines, pointing out that the impeachment process must be concluded within 10 days.

    “The Senate has a greater duty to comply with the Constitution and stick to the strict timeline of 10 days,” Kingi stated.

    However, the Deputy President’s legal team walked out in protest after the Senate rejected the motion to adjourn to Saturday.

    “We shall be perpetuating an illegality if we were to sit in parliament without instructions from our client,” said Lawyer Ndegwa Njiru.

    Charges Against Gachagua

    The 11 charges facing Gachagua range from allegations of financial misconduct to accusations of ethnic divisiveness.

    The impeachment motion accuses him of undermining President William Ruto’s government and engaging in corrupt activities, including using proxies to amass significant wealth and state property.

    In addition, Gachagua has been accused of fostering division by engaging in politics that exploits ethnic tensions, a serious charge in Kenya’s delicate political landscape.

    One of the most damning accusations is that Gachagua manipulated his ailing brother, Nderitu Gachagua, into signing a will from his sickbed to acquire family assets, including a hotel.

    Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, who sponsored the impeachment motion, argued that Gachagua’s conduct amounted to “extraordinary wrongdoing” and warranted immediate removal from office.

    Mutuse also claimed that Gachagua had amassed wealth estimated at Ksh 5.2 billion through corrupt dealings, using his influence to award lucrative government tenders to family members and friends.

    However, Gachagua has dismissed all the accusations as false, calling the charges “ridiculous and embarrassing.”

  • Ruto Should Go Before Gachagua—Kalonzo

    Ruto Should Go Before Gachagua—Kalonzo

    Wiper party leader Kalonzo Musyoka now says President William Ruto should have been the first to be impeached, long before the motion to remove his deputy Rigathi Gachagua from office was tabled in Parliament.

    According to Kalonzo, the recently held public participation exercise on the impeachment motion against DP Gachagua proved that Kenyans are fed up with the entire Kenya Kwanza top administration, beginning with President Ruto himself.

    He went ahead to cite what he termed as a clarion call coined by Kenyans – “kufa dereva, kufa makanga” – which implies that both of the country’s two top leaders have lost the confidence of the country hence should be ousted as one.

    “Before Gachagua was allowed to defend himself, they (Parliament) went out there and purported to do public participation, which turned out to be actually a referendum vote on the presidency of William Ruto, including his own deputy. Because Kenyans were out saying it loudly, that both of them should leave office; kufa driver, kufa makanga,” he said.

    “In terms of public participation and perception, the clarion call was that if Gachagua has to be impeached, it should not be him [alone]. In fact Kenyans are saying, on a balance of scale, William Ruto himself should actually have gone first to be impeached. That’s what Kenyans are saying.”

    If, for nothing else, the opposition Azimio coalition co-principal went ahead to point out that President Ruto should have been impeached following the youth-led protests of June 25, 2024 where a number of Kenyans were killed and others abducted.

    “Following the events of June 25th, a lot of young Kenyans were killed, other were abducted, and many others are still missing as we speak today,” he said.

    “If that is not an impeachable offense on the part of the President, then I do not know what it is. Because the President is supposed to safeguard the lives, uphold the principles and basic rights of every Kenyan citizen under the Constitution.”

    Speaking on Citizen TV’s ‘The Explainer’ show on Tuesday night, Kalonzo rubbished the 11 grounds of impeachment against DP Gachagua tabled in the National Assembly by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse.

    The Wiper boss termed the charges as “frivolous,” but went ahead to add that “that’s a matter perhaps for the courts to decide.”

  • Court Declines To Stop DP Gachagua’s Impeachment Proceedings At The Senate

    Court Declines To Stop DP Gachagua’s Impeachment Proceedings At The Senate

    DP Rigathi Gachagua suffers major setback after High Court declines to stop Senate impeachment trial, rules Senate cannot be injucted by the court.

     

    In a ruling on Tuesday, October 15, Justice Chacha Mwita ruled that the prayers by Gachagua’s legal team would not be granted, but added that some of the issues raised were of considerable concern.

    “In considering the application and the argument by parties, the prayer for grant of conservatory order is declined,” Justice Mwita ruled.

    Gachagua had filed 26 court cases challenging the legality and process of his ouster from office by impeachment.

    Top of the issues presented in the petitions against the impeachment proceedings is the alleged lack of meaningful public participation.

    “The public was denied their democratic rights, with participation purportedly conducted only at county headquarters for a single day, while the impeachment vote proceeded simultaneously at the National Assembly on October 8, 2024,” Paul Muite- the lead counsel for Gachagua submitted.

    The petition also noted that some of the figures from the public participation exercise were erroneous, pointing to their claim that the laid down procedures for the impeachment were violated.

    Gachagua also petitioned the courts that his inalienable right to a fair hearing was violated and that the Senate’s plenary hearings slated for Wednesday, October 16-17, should be stopped.

    Another issue submitted by Gachagua’s battery of lawyers is that the impeachment at the National Assembly was hurried in the evening and submitted irregularly to the Senate for consideration.

    On Monday, October 14, 2024, Senate Speaker Amason Jeffah Kingi ruled that a court of law cannot stop the hearing and subsequent determination of an impeachment case which has been submitted to any house of Parliament

  • Gachagua’s Impeachment Could Divide The Country, NCIC Warns

    Gachagua’s Impeachment Could Divide The Country, NCIC Warns

    The National Cohesion and Integration Commission (NCIC) has warned that the unity of the country will be threatened if Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is impeached by the Senate.

    The commission through its chair Samuel Kobia on Monday warned about the possibility of conflicts between Kenyans if Senators uphold the decision of the National Assembly to impeach DP Gachagua.

    Senators are on Wednesday and Thursday this week expected to consider the motion before taking a vote.

    DP Gachagua will stand impeached if the decision is upheld.

    “Our major concern is that the way this process is shaping up could easily lead to conflicts between the people of Mt Kenya area and people from other parts of the country, this is what we are worried about,” Kobia warned.

    “We feel that the Senate in handling this matter should do it in a way that all Kenyana will feel that it has been fair and it has been done according to the law.”

    He further stated that the commission will have a keen interest in one of the charges facing the DP and that is threatening the national cohesion of the country.

    DP Gachagua is facing 11 charges.

    He however denied the allegations.

    Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse preferred 11 charges upon which MPs voted to send President William Ruto’s principal assistant packing.

    The accusations include gross violation of the constitution, undermining the President, undermining devolution, irregular acquisition of wealth, publicly attacking a judge, intimidating acting Kemsa CEO, promoting ethnicity and insubordination to the President among other charges.

    A total of 281 MPs voted in favour of the ouster motion against 44 who voted to save his young political career from sudden death.

    One MP abstained from voting. Only 233 MPs were needed to support the motion for Gachagua to stand impeached.

    The DP was given a chance to defend himself against all the accusations leveled against him in the motion.

    The besieged DP said he had full trust that the legislators would make the right decision.

    “Look, reflect and apply your conscience and make the right decision,” he said.

    “I have tremendous respect for the National Assembly and your ability and capacity to make the right decision.”

  • Embattled Rigathi Now Seeks To Block Senate From Impeachment Hearing

    Embattled Rigathi Now Seeks To Block Senate From Impeachment Hearing

    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has pleaded with the court to stop his scheduled impeachment motion at the Senate, alluding to being witchhunted.

    High Court Judge Chacha Mwita certified the matter urgent and ordered the petition to be heard on Monday.

    DP Gachagua was hounded out of office by the National Assembly, who voted overwhelmingly for his ouster.

    He therefore moved to the high court where he has pleaded with the court to issue a conservatory order prohibiting the Senate as a whole from proceeding with the impeachment hearing scheduled for 16th, 17th and 18th October 2024 on the basis of the resolution passed by the National Assembly on 8th October 2024 founded on the notice of motion dated 26th September 2024 concerning the proposed removal of the Deputy President Hon. Rigathi Gachagua from office by impeachment.

    Through Senior counsel Paul Muite, Gachagua want the court to restrain the Senate as a whole from admitting, processing, debating or in any other manner whatsoever considering the Motion for the proposed removal of Gachagua from office by impeachment founded on the notice of motion to the National Assembly dated 26/09/2024 pending hearing and determination.

    “This court has jurisdiction under Article 23 of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010, to consider and issue remedies in the nature of conservatory orders in appropriate and deserving cases,” says Gachagua

    The motion dated 26th September 2024 was tabled in the National Assembly of Kenya on 1st October 2024, proposing the removal of the office of the Deputy President.

    The National Assembly resolved to allow the motion on 8th October 2024 at approximately 9 pm. On that very night, the Clerk of the National assembly sent the Clerk of the Senate communication titled Resolution of the National Assembly on a special motion on the removal from office by impeachment of the Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

    The said resolution transmitted to the Clerk of the Senate by the Clerk of the National Assembly is invalid on the grounds that the impeachment motion is replete with general unsupported allegations, hearsay and outright lies and lacks the particularization and specificity required by Article 145(1) of the Constitution of Kenya and Standing Order 64(1A) of the Standing Orders of the National Assembly.

    The National Assembly did not conduct a constitutionally compliant public participation exercise prior to passing the impeachment motion on 8th October 2024. The impeachment motion does not meet the threshold test set by Article 145(1) and Wambora Appeal 1.

    The appropriate standard of proof was neither considered nor met when the National Assembly passed the impeachment resolution.

    Members of parliament debated and voted on the motion on grounds other than those set out in the motion. The impeachment was converted into a vicarious assault on family rather than investigation of constitutional violations by a public servant. Members of parliament were subjected to intimidation and undue influence prior to and during the hearing of the motion.

    The entire impeachment process has been designed to avoid and be ringfenced from judicial scrutiny and accountability. The process has been attended by uncharacteristic speed with the intention of ramming the process through before it can be audited for constitutional compliance.

    The National Assembly prosecuted proceedings on the basis that the Petitioner offended the President rather than the Constitution and the law. The object of the impeachment exercise appears to have been to please the President rather than examine fidelity to the Constitution of Kenya.

  • Morara Kebaso’s Life Is In Danger; Family Asks State To Beef Up His Security

    Morara Kebaso’s Life Is In Danger; Family Asks State To Beef Up His Security

    The family of activist David Morara Kebaso has condemned the attack on their kin during a public participation exercise on the impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua at the Bomas of Kenya last Friday.

    Speaking to the press on Sunday evening, family spokesperson Tom Moindi said they were appalled by the way the political activist was manhandled by goons while political leaders, including Members of Parliament, watched.

    Mr Moindi also called on the government to urgently investigate the incident and arrest those caught on camera throwing chairs at Mr Morara.

    “The government must bring to account everyone who was recorded doing the heinous act at the Bomas of Kenya. Morara’s life is in danger. He was seriously injured and has been receiving treatment since the attack,” he said.

    To safeguard their loved one, the family asked the State to provide police security to Morara who won the admiration of many Kenyans, and to the chagrin of the government, with his exposés on wastage of taxpayer’s money on stalled or abandoned projects.

    The family’s sentiments were echoed by Mr Patrick Mwongera, an official in Morara’s office, who said that immediately after taking Morara to hospital, they moved him to a safe house.

    This, he said, was to protect the activist, whose approach to accountability had apparently rubbed some people in power the wrong way.

    “We are not going to take any chances! Morara’s life is in danger. We are being targeted by some people who do not want to hear what we stand for. We have received a video of a man holding a gun in a Subaru vehicle who is threatening to trace Morara and finish him off!” he said.

    Mr Morara, visibly in pain, appeared with his family at the press briefing but did not address journalists.

    Mr Mwongera said that they had not reported Morara’s attack to the police because the “same police officers were used to arrest our leader and came up with unsubstantiated charges against him last week”.

    The Morara team said they suspected that the plan to attack the activist must have been premeditated because he was even denied entry to the Bomas and had to use another door other than the main entrance to access the venue.

    “Things would have gone awry very easily. We had just arrived much to the joy of hundreds of Kenyans who even came to greet Morara. Suddenly, some goons started throwing chairs at Morara who was just sitting waiting for his turn to speak,” Mr Mwongera said.

    The action was captured on camera, with footage showing seats being thrown at the activist, who had to be led away by some of his aides who surrounded him.

    By Sunday evening, the public had managed to identify a woman suspected of instigating the melee at Bomas.

    She is said to be a resident of Mlango Kubwa area in Mathare and was the first to throw the chair at Mr Morara before many others followed suit, causing chaos at the venue.

    Although the Morara team has established her identity, they have been told to report to any police station as their leader could be re-arrested and charged with spurious offences as happened last week.

    “This case is even more serious because we have no idea of who we are dealing with. Kenyans do not know that Morara was denied access to the emergency exit door when he attempted to run away from his attackers at Bomas. He remained stranded and it is at this point that he sustained even more injuries,” Mr Mwongera said.

    Contacted if any arrests had been made following the drama at Bomas and whether the woman, whose identity has been made public, is a person of interest to the police, Nairobi Regional Boss Adamson Bungei is yet to respond.

    Busia Senator Okiya Omtatah is among Kenyan leaders who have called for the immediate investigation and arrest of the instigators of last Friday’s violence in Bomas.

    “Dear Kenyans, I unequivocally condemn the violence directed towards political activist and youthful government critic, Morara Kebaso. Such acts of aggression have no place in a democratic society that upholds the principles of free speech, open dialogue and peaceful assembly,” he said.

    Mr Mwongera also called on the government to provide Morara with additional security.

    “The government should appreciate such a person who is helping them to know how huge amounts of money are being stolen by people within the government. We ask that Morara’s security be beefed up,” he said.

  • Gachagua Begs Ruto, MPs For Forgiveness Ahead Of Impeachment Hearing

    Gachagua Begs Ruto, MPs For Forgiveness Ahead Of Impeachment Hearing

    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has publicly appealed for forgiveness from President William Ruto in his first response since an impeachment motion against him was tabled in the National Assembly

    Gachagua, who faces the possibility of being removed from office, urged his boss to set aside any grievances for the sake of peace in the country.

    “In the two years we’ve been working together, the journey has been challenging. In our zeal and commitment, it’s possible that I may have wronged you,” Gachagua said.

    “I want to ask my brother William Ruto to forgive me if my actions have caused any offense.”

    The impeachment motion, spearheaded by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse, has placed Gachagua in a precarious position on the verge of exiting government.

    He also extended his plea for forgiveness to Parliament, in particular the 291 MPs who supported the impeachment motion, which cites nine grounds for his potential removal

    “I ask Parliament to forgive any remarks or actions of mine that may have caused offense,” Gachagua said, acknowledging the legislature’s pivotal role in the outcome of the impeachment process.

    In addition, the Deputy President sought forgiveness on behalf of his wife, Dorcas Rigathi, lamenting that she had been dragged into his political troubles, with her privacy compromised due to public and social media commentary.

    “If my wife, in her efforts to support the boy child and other programs, has offended anyone, I ask for forgiveness on her behalf,” he added.

    Gachagua’s appeal is seen as a bid to reconcile with both President William Ruto and Parliament as he fights to maintain his position in the government.

  • 20 Lawyers Led By Paul Muite To Represent DP Gachagua In Parliament

    20 Lawyers Led By Paul Muite To Represent DP Gachagua In Parliament

    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is said to be banking on the services of about 20 law firms that will defend him against 11 charges contained in the motion seeking his ouster at Parliament.

    The DP who has gone under in the last five days is said to have been meeting the lawyers in a bid to put up a spirited fight to thwart the attempt to kick him out of office.

    Sources privy to Gachagua’s battery of lawyers say the team will be led by veteran Senior Counsel Paul Muite who will team up with one of Kenya’s best legal minds Fred Ngatia in facing Gachagua’s accusers at the National Assembly and the Senate if the motion sails through.

    The team is also mulling going all the way to the Supreme Court if they fail to save Gachagua in Parliament and at the lower courts.

    Victor Swanya, one of the lawyers who filed a case earlier this week to stop his impeachment motion at the National Assembly, in an interview confirmed that Muite will be the face of Gachagua’s legal team.

    Swanya confirmed that the DP will be represented by a team of about 20 lawyers.

     “Senior Counsel Paul Muite is the one who is leading us. We have counsels Tom Macharia and Amos Kisilu. Elisha Ongoya and others,” he said.

    According to Swanya, they have assessed the charges facing Gachagua and they are prepared to take on the matter head-on.

    “We have looked through the points, the accusations of the deputy president, and we’re prepared to deal with the,” he said.

    Gachagua’s legal team is banking their defence on the public participation exercise which they say did not meet the constitutional threshold.

    “You are giving a notice at night and people are supposed to wake up and participate in that exercise. How fair is that? We have people who worship on Saturday and such they cannot participate in the exercise. Notice should be reasonable,” he said.

    The DP is said to have met his legal team on Saturday in one of the regular meetings that aim to mount a fightback plan.

    Muite is a seasoned Lawyers who has been in the corridors of justice for decades representing clients in several top cases that have been the subject of public concerns.

    He successfully represented former Embu Governor Martin Wambora who challenged his impeachment by the Senate Assembly in courts while serving as county boss.

    In the case, Muite relied on the failure to conduct adequate public participation to thwart the removal of Embu governors from office.

    Ngatia on the other hand is one of the most revered lawyers in the country. He represented President William Ruto in the 2022 General Election petition.

    He has also represented Former President Uhuru Kenyatta in the 2013 and 2017 Presidential petitions.

    Ongoya on his part is remembered as one of the top legal minds who mounted a spirited fight that killed the Building Bridges Initiative that went all the way to the Supreme Court of Kenya.

    He was the lead counsel of Meru Governor Kawira Mwangaza in the last two impeachment motions at the Senate Assembly.

    He successfully represented Mwangaza in the first impeachment in which Mwangaza won after Senators voted to keep him in office.

    In the second impeachment, however, Senators voted to remove the governor from office, which is currently pending in court after her lawyers secured orders staying the Senate verdict.

  • List Of MPs Who Signed Motion To Impeach Gachagua

    List Of MPs Who Signed Motion To Impeach Gachagua

    After weeks of speculation, a motion to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua was filed in Parliament on Tuesday.

    Some 291 members of Parliament signed the impeachment motion, well beyond the 117 threshold. Drawn from the ruling Kenya Kwanza coalition and Azimio la Umoja, the lawmakers united and signed the motion.

    However, some 54 legislators had a different view on the matter, opting not to sign the motion sponsored by Kibwezi West MP Mwengi Mutuse.

    Mutuse listed 11 grounds on which he wants Gachagua removed from office, including suspicious acquisition of wealth estimated at Sh5.2 billion within just two years.

    The MP also accused the DP of stirring ethnic hatred and undermining the government and insubordination to the President.

    Gachagua has dismissed all the allegations levelled against him.

    The National Assembly adjourned Wednesday morning sitting from 12pm to 2pm to discuss procedure on the public opinions on the impeachment motion to seal loopholes that could thwart Gachagua’s removal through courts.

    The House later announced the public participation exercise on the impeachment motion will be conducted at the constituency level across 290 constituencies countrywide on Friday.

    The House later extended the collection of views to Saturday.

    Those who voted yes for the impeachment include:-

    (1) Eckomas Mwengi Mutuse – presenter of the impeachment motion

    (2) Owen Baya

    (3) Japheth Nyakundi

    (4) Mathias Robi

    (5) Kimani Ichung’wah

    (6) Dawood Abdul

    (7) Patrick Munene

    (8) Eric Wamumbi

    (9) George Kariuki

    (10) Daniel Karitho

    (11) Dorothy Muthoni

    (12) Mwangi Kiunjuri

    (13) Mpuru Aburi

    (14) Elizabeth Kairemi

    (15) Edwin Gichuki

    (16) Rindikiri Mugambi

    (17) Jane Kagiri

    (18) Anne Muratha

    (19) John-Paul Mwirigi

    (20) David Gikaria

    (21) John Kirago

    (22) Mary Maingi

    (23) Alice Nganga

    (24) Wambugu Wainaina

    (25) Machua Waithaka

    (26) Kuria Kimani

    (27) George Gitonga

    (28) Simon Nganga

    (29) John Kiarie

    (30) Shadrack Mwiti

    (31) Joseph Wainaina

    (32) Betty Maina

    (33) Geoffrey Ruku

    (34) GG Kagombe

    (35) Julius Taitumu

    (36) Duncan Maina

    (37) Kwenya Thuku

    (38) John Njuguna

    (39) John Mutunga

    (40) Junet Mohammed

    (41) Mohamed Abdikadir

    (42) Yakubo Adow

    (43) Richard Chonga

    (44) Ali Wario

    (45) Ruweida Obo

    (46) Hamisi Chome Abdi

    (47) Abdikadir Mohamed

    (48) Zamzam Mohammed

    (49) Rashid Bedzimba

    (50) Said Buya

    (51) Peter Shake

    (52) Peter Masara

    (53) Mishi Mboko

    (54) Joyce Bensouda

    (55) Fatuma Masito

    (56) Mohammed Machele

    (57) Aduma Owuor

    (58) Jerusha Momanyi

    (59) Lilian Gogo

    (60) Millie Odhiambo

    (61) Irene Mayaka

    (62) Dick Maungu

    (63) Joshua Oron

    (64) Walter Owino

    (65) Patrick Osero

    (66) Molfason Barongo

    (67) Mark Nyamita

    (68) Tom Odege

    (69) Gisairo Ombane

    (70) Oku Kaunya

    (71) Rozah Buyu

    (72) Charles Were

    (73) Fatuma Mohammed

    (74) Paul Abuor

    (75) Twalib Badu

    (76) Charles Ochieng

    (77) Caleb Amisi

    (78) Elisha Odhiambo

    (79) Farah Maalim

    (80) Elijah Memusi

    (81) Kakuta Hamisi

    (82) Aden Mohamed

    (83) Raphael Wanjala

    (84) Peter Orero

    (85) Martin Owino

    (86) Peter Kaluma

    (87) TJ Kajwang’

    (88) Chiforomodo Mangale

    (89) Donya Doris

    (90) Stephen Mogaka

    (91) Phelix Odiwuor

    (92) Geoffrey Odanga

    (93) Tim Wanyonyi

    (94) Christine Ombaka

    (95) Hussein Weitan

    (96) George Aladwa

    (97) Joseph Oyula

    (98) John Bwire

    (99) Omar Mwingi

    (100) Catherine Omanyo

    (101) Danson Mwashako

    (102) Innocent Mugabe

    (103) Charles Nguna

    (104) Elsie Muhanda

    (105) JL Sunkuli

    (106) Udgoon Siyad

    (107) John Ariko

    (108) Tindi Mwale

    (109) Otiende Amollo

    (110) Chris Aseka

    (111) Paul Ekwon

    (112) Nicholas Gikor

    (113) Yusuf Mohammed

    (114) Abdikadir Hussein

    (115) James K’Oyoo

    (116) Sarah Korere

    (117) Umkher Mohammed

    (118) James Nyikal

    (119) Daniel Manduku

    (120) Mohammed Adow

    (121) Wario Guyo

    (122) Paul Katana

    (123) Morris Khakayi

    (124) Emmanuel Wangwe

    (125) Bernard Shinyali

    (126) Nabii Nabwera

    (127) Patrick Makau

    (128) Shakil Shabir

    (129) Aden Keynan

    (130) Fatuma Jehow

    (131) Amina Mnyazi

    (132) Gertrude Mbeyu

    (133) Adipo Okuome

    (134) Abdi Omar

    (135) Tom Oluoch

    (136) Beatrice Elachi

    (137) Samuel Arama

    (138) Guyo Jaldesa

    (139) Anthony Kibagendi

    (140) Samuel Atandi

    (141) Ruth Odinga

    (142) Eve Obara

    (143) Johnson Manya

    (144) Kipyegon Joannah

    (145) Omboko Milemba

    (146) Marwa Maisori

    (147) Moses Kirima

    (148) Lydiah Aiga

    (149) Adan Yusuf

    (150) Mumina Bonaya

    (151) Charles Gimose

    (152) Mohamed Tubi

    (153) Zaheer Jhanda

    (154) Clement Sloya

    (155) Zuleika Arun

    (156) Jackson Lekumontare

    (157) Anthony Kenga

    (158) Bashir Abdulahi

    (159) Didmus Barasa

    (160) Malulu Injendi

    (161) Geoffrey Mulanya

    (162) Fredrick Ikana

    (163) Titus Amala

    (164) Joseph Dena

    (165) Kivai Kagesi

    (166) Vincent Musyoka

    (167) Fabian Muli

    (168) Caleb Mule

    (169) Joshua Mwalyo

    (170) Rachel Nyamai

    (171) Nimrod Mbai

    (172) Dido Raso

    (173) Joseph Lekuton

    (174) Sylvanus Osoro

    (175) Abdisarat Ali

    (176) Abdul Haro

    (177) Irene Njoki

    (178) Nebert Muriuki

    (179) George Gachagua

    (180) Stephen Karani

    (181) Githua Wamacukuru

    (182) Mukami Wacira

    (183) Njoroge Wainaina

    (184) Elijah Njoroge

    (185) Daniel Nanok

    (186) Monica Muthoni

    (187) Kenneth Tungulu

    (188) Stanley Muthama

    (189) Joseph Namur

    (190) Faith Gitau

    (191) Cecilia Asiyeni

    (192) Pamela Njoki

    (193) Robert Basil

    (194) Protus Akuja

    (195) Sawa Tandaza

    (196) Pauline Lengimis

    (197) Robert Pukose

    (198) George Sunkuiya

    (199) Joash Nyamoko

    (200) Kitilai ole Ntutu

    (201) Leah Sankaire

    (202) Lemanken Aramat

    (203) Agnes Pareno

    (204) Gabriel Tongoyo

    (205) Rebecca Tonkei

    (206) Catherine Wambilianga

    (207) John Makali

    (208) John Chikati

    (209) Susan Ngugi

    (210) Mburu Kahangara

    (211) Geoffrey Wandeto

    (212) Ronald Karauri

    (213) Jackson Koech

    (214) Jackson Kosgei

    (215) Adams Kipsanai

    (216) Kagogo Bowen

    (217) Jematia Sergon

    (218) William Kamket

    (219) Catherine Ng’elechei

    (220) Reuben Kiborek

    (221) Kimaiyo Gideon

    (222) Musa Sirma

    (223) Joseph Kipkorus

    (224) Joshua Kandie

    (225) Charles Kamuren

    (226) John Walukhe

    (227) Richard Yegon

    (228) Richard Kilel

    (229) Brighton Yegon

    (230) Francis Sigei

    (231) Kipngetich Koech

    (232) Linet Toto

    (233) Justice Kemei

    (234) Nelson Koech

    (235) Beatrice Kemei

    (236) Joseph Cherorot

    (237) Kibet Komingoi

    (238) Hillary Kosgei

    (239) Benjamin Lang’at

    (240) Alfred Mutai

    (241) Liza Chelule

    (242) Jospeh Tonui

    (243) Paul Chebor

    (244) Fred Kapondi

    (245) Lilian Siyoi

    (246) Naomi Jilo

    (247) Feisal Abdi

    (248) Alpha Miruka

    (249) Deko Barrow

    (250) Innocent Obiri

    (251) Gideon Ogolla

    (252) Sabina Chege

    (253) Peter Lechakepong

    (254) Samuel Chemulel

    (255) Rael Kasiwai

    (256) David Pkosing

    (257) Titus Lote

    (258) Joseph Samal

    (259) Dominic Eli

    (260) Kareke Mbiuki

    (261) Martin Pepela

    (262) Wanami Wamboka

    (263) David Ochieng

    (264) Kevin Wanyonyi

    (265) Gladys Shollei

    (266) Paul Biego

    (267) Marrianne Kittany

    (268) Samuel Kiprono

    (269) Janet Sityenei

    (270) Cynthia Muge

    (271) Josses Lelmengit

    (272) David Kiplagat

    (273) Julius Kipbiwott

    (274) Julius Ruto

    (275) Bernard Kitur

    (276) Phylis Bartoo

    (277) Oscar Sudi

    (278) Dan Wanyama

    (279) Beatrice Adagala

    (280) Amina Dika

    (281) Abdi Ali

    (282) Hussein Barre

    (283) Gonzi Rai

    (284) Ibrahim Abdi

    (285) Kerr Kassim

    (286) Sarah Farah

    (287) Caroli Omondi

    (288) Robert Gichimu

    (289) Michael Muchira

    (290) Jared Okello

    (291) Mary Emase

  • You Don’t Have The Power To Remove Me Before The Term Ends, Gachagua Tells Off Ruto And His MPs

    You Don’t Have The Power To Remove Me Before The Term Ends, Gachagua Tells Off Ruto And His MPs

    Deputy president Rigathi Gachagua on Friday sustained his scathing attack against his boss President William Ruto, maintaining that the latter and MPs have no powers to drop him midway before the first term lapses.

    Mr Gachagua, at the risk of an impeachment motion, said to be in the works in the National Assembly, insisted that President Ruto ascended to power because the DP was in his ticket, and the populous Mt Kenya region voted for the Head of State because of this.

    “No one can sack me midway and whoever wants to do so, let him come to you (the people) and seek your opinion first. Let them allow me to finish the first term. I am being fought for speaking the truth because there is no need of telling lies all the time,’’ Mr Gachagua said on Friday when he attended a special AGM for Komothai  Coffee Growers  Cooperative Society in Githunguri Constituency, Kiambu.

    ”We want to tell people who are planning against me that we are ahead of them. Let them be cautious. Our people are clever.

    “We have no fools in Mount Kenya. We were elected together with President William Ruto because most of you saw me there and believed that your interests are catered for. I am also being fought for fighting land grabbing,’’ Mr Gachagua added.

    He was accompanied by MPs Githunguri Gathoni Wamuchomba (Githunguri), Maragua Member of Parliament Mary Wamaua (Maragua), Kiambu senator Karungo Thang’wa and his Nyandarua counterpart John Methu and among a host of local ward reps.

    Mr Gachagua said ‘it is harvesting time’ in Mt Kenya region where he suggested that leaders from the region are being funded by his opponents to fight him and undercut him politically.

    The Deputy President’s outburst comes a few days after Tana River senator Danson Mungatana filed a censure motion against him in the senate citing gross misconduct and insubordination.

    This happened amid rising momentum that has been building around the impeachment of Mr Gachagua who has now openly fallen out with his boss with claims that signature collections to remove him from office are underway.

    For two consecutive weeks, Mr Gachagua has been to Kiambu, one of the most populous counties that overwhelmingly gave Mr Ruto and Gachagua most presidential votes more than in Ruto’s home county- Uasin Gishu.

    On Sunday, Mr Gachagua attended the dedication Service of the Thika PEFA Church Cathedral Thika.

    Warning and ‘consequences’

    Mr Gachagua warned President Ruto against betrayal and maintained it comes with consequences.

    “To my boss, President William Ruto, be cautious and do the right thing. Let us not re-introduce the politics of the tribe. Our people hate betrayal and are very unforgiving when betrayed. That is my advice which must not be necessarily taken. Please let’s get back to work and fulfil the promises we made to Kenyans,” said Mr Gachagua.

    The Deputy President reminisced how they formed Kenya Kwanza government with a lot of challenges maintaining that the priority should be to serve Kenyans.

    ”There is no need for impeachment because the priority should be to serve Kenyans. I want to tell my boss to be cautious and avoid people who are inciting him,’’ Mr Gachagua added.

    He also told off the ‘doubting Thomas’ claim that he has failed the president by not discharging his assigned duties as per the Executive Order.

    He maintained that he has delivered on his mandate on the sub-sector of coffee, tea and milk, to ensure reforms, including the debts accrued to farmers.

    “I want to say I am a very happy person. And those who are saying the DP has not done his job. if the cost of cost has moved from 17 to Sh 87, is that not a remarkable achievement?” he inquired.

    “Some are talking about coffee which they don’t know how or where its grown. We released Sh 7 billion to pay debts for coffee. I will follow up on the same. When cleared, let the chairmen make sure not to take loans against but take advantage of the Cherry Fund at three percent,’ he said.

  • Gachagua’s Fate: The Impeachment of a Deputy President In Kenya

    Gachagua’s Fate: The Impeachment of a Deputy President In Kenya

    Kenya is no stranger to political turmoil, and the current situation is no different. Two years into office, President William Ruto’s fallout with Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has reached a boiling point.

    Political insiders have hinted at a brewing storm, with impeachment plans against Gachagua gaining momentum.

    The alliance between Ruto and opposition leader Raila Odinga has raised eyebrows, leading to claims that the new political pact is designed to push Gachagua out of office.

    With over 116 lawmakers reportedly supporting the motion, Kenya may be on the verge of witnessing a significant political shift.

    Gachagua’s Impeachment

    Gachagua’s Fate: Will His Impeachment Be a Political Earthquake?

    The push to impeach Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has ignited political tremors across Kenya, with alliances shifting ahead of the 2027 elections.

    Gachagua, once seen as a close ally to President Ruto, now faces opposition from within the government. However, Gachagua’s political survival could lead to unexpected realignments.

    Former Vice President Stephen Kalonzo and DAP-K leader Eugene Wamalwa have vowed to stand by Gachagua, positioning themselves for a potential coalition with the left-leaning remnants of Azimio.

    This would create a formidable opposition block against Ruto’s camp, signaling a dramatic shift in the country’s political dynamics.

    The impeachment effort, initially seen as political maneuvering, could trigger a seismic realignment as Gachagua’s camp seeks new allies.

    With 2027 on the horizon, these evolving alliances could drastically reshape Kenya’s leadership and future political landscape, leaving the nation’s power balance in flux. All eyes are on the next move.

    The Process of Impeaching a Deputy President in Kenya

    Kenya’s Constitution provides a clear legal framework for impeaching a Deputy President, though it’s a rare occurrence in the country’s history.

    Under Article 150, the process can be initiated on several grounds: physical or mental incapacity, gross violation of the Constitution or any other law, serious criminal allegations, or gross misconduct.

    This process mirrors that of removing a sitting President, meaning it requires careful legal and political maneuvering to succeed.

    The process starts with a motion in the National Assembly, which must garner the support of at least one-third of the Members of Parliament (MPs).

    Once the motion is submitted, the National Assembly Speaker reviews it, and if the grounds for impeachment are valid, it moves to the next phase.

    If the motion is approved by at least two-thirds of MPs, it then moves to the Senate, where a special committee is formed to investigate the allegations.

    The Deputy President has the right to defend themselves before this committee, and if the committee finds merit in the allegations, the Senate must vote. A two-thirds majority in the Senate is required to finalize the impeachment.

    The Political Battle Behind Gachagua’s Impeachment

    The growing tension between President William Ruto and his deputy, Rigathi Gachagua, has created a political fissure within the Kenyan government.

    Gachagua has accused Ruto of betraying their pact by forming an alliance with opposition leader Raila Odinga.

    Many believe this new relationship with Odinga is a calculated move to sideline Gachagua and consolidate power.

    Gachagua’s claims of insubordination, fueled by political whispers, have only intensified the impeachment push.

    The alliance between Ruto and Odinga has left many of their respective allies excited and nervous in equal measure.

    On one hand, this newfound cooperation could stabilize the country by promoting unity between the ruling party and opposition.

    On the other hand, it presents a serious threat to Gachagua’s position, as Raila’s influence could easily sway members of the opposition to back the impeachment motion.

    The Role of Parliament and Political Maneuvering

    The impeachment process against Rigathi Gachagua has reportedly gained support from more than 116 MPs, surpassing the one-third threshold required to table the motion.

    According to insiders, the motion may be tabled even before President Ruto returns from his trip to the United States. However, the process is delicate, and any misstep could provide Gachagua with an opportunity to defend himself against these allegations.

    Reports suggest that MPs from both Ruto’s camp and Raila’s camp are involved in the plotting, with Leader of Minority Junet Mohammed receiving direct instructions from Raila Odinga to rally support for the impeachment.

    The bipartisan nature of this motion demonstrates the fragility of political alliances in Kenya, where allegiances can shift dramatically in response to changing political winds.

    One question lingers: Why now? Some argue that Gachagua’s outspoken nature and disagreements with the president have isolated him within government circles.

    Others point to the fact that Ruto’s administration has faced significant challenges, including economic hardships and widespread corruption allegations, and that removing Gachagua could be part of a larger strategy to regain public trust.

    What Happens After an Impeachment?

    Should Rigathi Gachagua be impeached, the Constitution outlines the next steps. Within 14 days, the President must nominate a new Deputy President, subject to a vote in the National Assembly.

    This nomination process is highly significant, as it could either solidify Ruto’s grip on power or deepen divisions within the government.

    If Gachagua is impeached, the political ramifications will be felt far beyond his removal. The process could destabilize Ruto’s government, potentially alienating the Mount Kenya region, which has been a key support base for both Ruto and Gachagua.

    The fallout could also affect the future of the 2027 general elections, with the political landscape reshaping itself in the wake of these events.

    Kenya’s political class is known for its ability to forge and break alliances based on convenience. The Ruto-Raila pact may hold for now, but if history is any indication, these alliances are often temporary.

    What will remain in the public’s memory, however, is the precedent that will be set if a Deputy President is impeached in such a dramatic fashion.

    A Political Earthquake on the Horizon?

    The potential impeachment of Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is shaping up to be one of the most significant political events in Kenya’s recent history.

    The fallout between Gachagua and Ruto, coupled with the alliance with Raila Odinga, has created a situation where political survival is at stake.

    The process of impeaching a Deputy President is a high-stakes game, and if it goes through, it will signal a major shift in Kenya’s political landscape.

    The next few weeks will be critical, as lawmakers move to table the motion and the political maneuvering intensifies.

    Whether or not the impeachment succeeds, it has already exposed the fragile nature of Kenya’s political alliances and the lengths to which leaders will go to consolidate power.

    One thing is certain: Kenya is about to experience a political earthquake, the aftershocks of which will be felt for years to come.

  • ‪Impeachment Motion Against Gachagua Surpasses 117-Signature Threshold For Tabling‬

    ‪Impeachment Motion Against Gachagua Surpasses 117-Signature Threshold For Tabling‬

    The much-anticipated impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has sailed past the 117-signature threshold required for the tabling before the House next.

    Kimilili MP Didmus Barasa, who announced his intention to move the motion on Thursday, said he had collected 242 signatures from lawmakers in support of the bid.

    Should the motion find its way to the National Assembly, Barasa, an ally of President William Ruto, will require 233 votes to pass.

    “I am the sponsor of the impeachment motion against the Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and so far, I have received 242 signatures and an additional six MPs were awaiting to append their signatures,” he told Capital News on phone.

    Article 150 of the Constitution dictates grounds for impeaching a Deputy President as gross violation of the Constitution, suspicion for committing a crime and gross misconduct.

    Cracks between President Ruto and his deputy has been widening by the day with the impeachment motion marking the latest escalation after Gachagua called out the Head of State in a televised interview on September 20.

    Lobbying efforts

    Intense lobbying has been ongoing in the corridors of Parliament by factions within the ruling coalition as both political camps seek to sway the tide their way in the ongoing political squabbles.

    “I will prosecute the impeachment motion on the floor of the house and by close of business today I will be presenting the signatures to the office of the speaker,” Barasa said.

    “Its upon the speaker to consider the motion next week and make communication of having received the impeachment motion after which I will do what I do best by prosecuting the motion on the floor of the house,” he added.

    Lawmakers forming the western region caucus held a Kamkunji Thursday afternoon to deliberate the way forward in talks that reached consensus on Gachagua’s ouster.

    A source suggested plans to table the motion as soon as October 1.

    “That one (impeachment) we have agreed is sealed but we now await for the impeachment motion to be tabled before the House next week,” an MP who sought anonymity said.

    Article 145 states that a member of the National Assembly may move to impeach the Deputy President if at least one-third of the members support the motion.

    Upon approval fro tabling, the mover requires 233 MPs for the motion to move to the Senate for consideration.

    The Speaker of the National Assembly is requred to notify the Speaker of the Senate which will then convene within seven days.

    In considering the motion, the Senate may form an eleven-member special committee to investigate the allegations.

    After granting the Deputy President audience, the committee will transmit its recommendations to the Senate within ten days where its report will require a two-thirds backing for the impeachment to stand.

  • Inside DP Gachagua’s Dream World: Ruto’s Re-Election Hangs on Murima’s Support

    Inside DP Gachagua’s Dream World: Ruto’s Re-Election Hangs on Murima’s Support

    DP Rigathi Gachagua doubts President William Ruto’s chances for re-election in 2027. According to Gachagua, Ruto will struggle to gather even 2 million votes without the Kikuyu vote.

    The deputy president believes Ruto is gambling with his political future as the next election approaches.

    Unlike in 2022, when Ruto confidently relied on Kikuyu’s support, his image is tarnished.

     

     

    Why DP Gachagua Believes Ruto’s Re-Election Hinges on Murima’s Support

    In the high-stakes political chess game leading up to the 2027 elections, Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has one thing clear in his mind—President William Ruto cannot clinch re-election without the unwavering support of the ‘Murima’ community.

    Behind closed doors, Gachagua is pushing this narrative hard, convinced that Ruto’s survival in Kenya’s cutthroat political arena depends on consolidating the Kikuyu vote, a bloc historically known for tipping the scales in decisive elections.

    But why Murima? For Gachagua, the Mount Kenya region represents a political fortress, one that holds the keys to power.

    Without its backing, even Ruto’s formidable political machine might sputter. Gachagua, being a son of Murima, knows that this stronghold is no longer guaranteed.

    The once-solid base has shown signs of cracking, with fractures emerging from internal dissatisfaction, economic frustrations, and growing opposition alliances keen on exploiting any weaknesses.

    Despite his confidence in Ruto’s leadership, Gachagua privately fears that a divided Murima vote would be catastrophic for their political future.

    His strategy? A relentless campaign to ensure that the Murima people remain firmly in Ruto’s corner, even as his critics argue that the DP’s own ambitions are clouding his judgment. Gachagua knows the stakes—and they are personal. His political career and credibility are intertwined with Ruto’s success.

    Signs of Trouble at UDA

    Recent events highlight growing discontent within Ruto’s United Democratic Alliance (UDA). At a recent conference at Bomas of Kenya, a gathering meant to boost UDA turned into an anti-Ruto rally.

    Organizers, including state operative Dennis Itumbi, paid university students to attend. However, the crowd disrupted the event, chanting “yote yawezekana bila Ruto” (“everything is possible without Ruto”). This incident suggests a fracture within Ruto’s base.

    Ruto’s attempts to consolidate power are failing, especially as he struggles to manage tensions between Gachagua and Interior Cabinet Secretary Kithure Kindiki.

    During a church service in Nyeri, Ruto notably skipped an event where Gachagua was expected to sit next to him, signaling a clear rift. Ruto even admonished Gachagua to focus on governance instead of early campaigning for 2027.

    Political Attacks and Impeachment Threats

    The attacks on Gachagua have intensified. Kimani Ichung’wah, the majority leader, called for Gachagua’s ouster, likening him to a snake that could harm Ruto. He accused Gachagua of divisive politics, which has alienated many Mt. Kenya MPs.

    Ichung’wah claims that Gachagua’s style is threatening the region’s unity and has led to intimidation among his colleagues. In response, Gachagua’s allies rallied over 50 lawmakers to strategize against potential impeachment.

    They argue that any attempt to remove him from office will be met with fierce resistance. Gathoni Wamuchomba, an MP from Gachagua’s camp, insisted that the power to impeach lies with the electorate, not politicians.

    DP Gachagua and The Future of Mt. Kenya Politics

    Gachagua faces not only internal opposition but also the looming influence of former President Uhuru Kenyatta, who still commands respect among many in Mt. Kenya. Uhuru is reportedly promoting former Health Cabinet Secretary Mutahi Kagwe as a key player in the upcoming elections.

    As tensions rise, Gachagua warns his rivals in Mt. Kenya of the consequences they will face in the 2027 elections. He has drawn parallels to an old Kikuyu tale, indicating that those who plot against him will ultimately face their own downfall.

    In a rapidly shifting political landscape, Gachagua knows that without Mt. Kenya’s backing, Ruto’s chances for a second term remain uncertain. The upcoming elections will test not only Ruto’s leadership but also the unity and loyalty of the Kikuyu community.

  • Gachagua: I Was Removed From President Ruto’s Diary WhatsApp Group

    Gachagua: I Was Removed From President Ruto’s Diary WhatsApp Group

    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has revealed that he was removed from a WhatsApp group containing President William Ruto’s official schedule, further highlighting the deepening tensions between the two leaders.

    Speaking during an exclusive interview on Citizen TV Friday night, Gachagua said the removal has left him in the dark about key presidential functions.

    “I no longer know the president’s schedule. My team and I were removed from that WhatsApp group by the president’s Private Secretary, Mr. Maiyo. It’s very petty,” Gachagua disclosed.

    The deputy president suggested that this exclusion is part of a broader plot to isolate him from government operations. “Everyone knows that there was a meeting in Nyahururu and another one at a Cabinet Secretary’s house in Kitisuru, Nairobi, where the plot to remove me was hatched. It’s not a secret,” he claimed.

    Gachagua further explained that his absence from recent key presidential events was a result of this exclusion. “If I’m not part of the group, how am I supposed to know where the president will be?” he questioned.

    He explained that was the reason he was not at the Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (JKIA) to receive his boss this week when he flew back from Germany.

    “I was not aware of the time the president was arriving,” he said, explaining, “even today, I don’t know what time he is leaving for New York and he has not spoken to me since morning.”

    The deputy president expressed frustration, saying that President Ruto had once assured him he would not face the same kind of intimidation that Ruto endured during his tenure as deputy president under Uhuru Kenyatta. “The president promised that he wouldn’t allow people to intimidate me, as he was intimidated when he was deputy. But what I am experiencing now is far worse,” Gachagua lamented.

    Despite the apparent fallout, Gachagua warned that any impeachment motion against him would require the president’s approval. “No motion to impeach a deputy president can be tabled in Parliament without the president’s knowledge, so if it’s tabled, then it must have his approval,” he stated.

    He also voiced concerns that such political maneuvers could destabilize the country. “I am asking the president to stop this, as it could have far-reaching consequences for national stability.”

    In the interview, Gachagua also refuted claims of bullying MPs and elected leaders, which have surfaced in recent weeks. He blamed the allegations on his straightforward nature, stating, “I don’t bully anyone. I’m just truthful. I ask MPs to listen to the people, and they call that bullying.”

    The removal from the WhatsApp group seems to symbolize the broader rift between Gachagua and several key leaders, including Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja and Majority Leader Kimani Ichung’wah, both of whom have publicly criticized the deputy president. Sakaja recently described Gachagua as a “bully,” while Ichung’wah accused him of using intimidation tactics to influence Mount Kenya MPs.

    Nevertheless, Gachagua insisted that his support among the electorate, particularly in Nyeri, remains strong. “It doesn’t matter what they say—what matters is that the people of Nyeri are with me. Forty-four MCAs and the Governor of Nyeri support me,” he asserted.

  • Njuri Ncheke Elders Endorse Kindiki As Mt Kenya Kingpin Replacing Gachagua

    Njuri Ncheke Elders Endorse Kindiki As Mt Kenya Kingpin Replacing Gachagua

    Njuri Ncheke elders from Meru and Tharaka Nithi counties have officially endorsed Interior Cabinet Secretary Kithure Kindiki as their preferred representative to President William Ruto’s administration.

    The elders made the announcement during a meeting held at their headquarters on Wednesday, September 18, 2024.

    The elders noted that the decision to back Kindiki, who hails from Meru and currently serves as the interior CS was based on his strong working relationship with President Ruto. The elders expressed confidence in Kindiki’s ability to serve as the region’s key liaison with the national government.

    “As the Njuri Ncheke elders from Meru and Tharaka Nithi counties, we have gathered here at our headquarters to endorse Kithure Kindiki, who works well with our president, William Ruto. Kithure Kindiki is our own son from Meru who is the Cabinet Secretary for Interior. Today, Njuri Ncheke in their numbers have endorsed Kindiki as our kingpin who will be our link to the government. We are asking him to speak to our president to bring us development. Njuri Ncheke has spoken, and once they do, there is no opposition,” one elder stated.

    By endorsing Kindiki as the regional kingpin, the elders said they aim to solidify his role as a vital bridge between their communities and the national government, ensuring better representation and development in the region.

    Gachagua out, Kindiki in

    This endorsement comes just a week after elders from Embu, Meru, and Tharaka Nithi counties severed ties with Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua who has for a long time been considered the dominant figure in the larger Mt. Kenya region. They threw their support behind Kindiki as the key link between the Mt. Kenya East region and the national government.

    “We support the call for Prof. Kindiki to lead Mt. Kenya East’s engagement in national discussions that will create networks at the national level to move Kenya forward,” they stated.

    The elders represented by Cyrus Ngeranwa and Mbiti Ruguongo from Njuri Njeke in Tharaka, expressed concerns over the rising political tensions in the Mt. Kenya region. They believe this unrest is diverting attention from essential development matters.

    “While we recognize the president’s efforts to bring growth and prosperity, we are concerned about the rising political tension,” the elders said.

    While they acknowledged President William Ruto’s efforts to appoint key leaders from Mt. Kenya East, including three Cabinet Secretaries, they emphasized the importance of focusing on development and unity instead of divisive political debates.

    The elders also reiterated their commitment to holding the government accountable for delivering on promises made during the 2022 economic forums, particularly in areas like improving farmers’ livelihoods, addressing youth unemployment, and completing pledged development projects.

  • Is Gachagua Facing Treason Charges? Uncovering the Political Machinations Behind Kenya’s Protests

    Is Gachagua Facing Treason Charges? Uncovering the Political Machinations Behind Kenya’s Protests

    Is Gachagua facing treason charges? President William Ruto’s recent address from the State House sent shockwaves through Kenya’s political landscape as he delivered a stern warning to those believed to be behind the unrest during the anti-finance bill protests.
    Ruto emphasized the government’s commitment to national security and suggested severe repercussions for those involved.
    Amidst these tensions, Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua finds himself under intense scrutiny, with allegations of treason and political maneuvering casting a shadow over Kenya’s leadership.
    Is Gachagua Facing Treason Charges?

    Is Gachagua Facing Treason Charges? Disecting Ruto’s Address on National Security

    Ruto underscored his constitutional duty to protect Kenya’s constitutional order. He stated, “Today’s events are crucial in how we handle threats to national security.”

    He vowed that those involved in orchestrating violence would face severe consequences. The president assured that security forces would be deployed to restore order.

    The Implications of Treason and Treachery

    Ruto labeled any threat to national security as an “existential threat” and equated it to treason. Under Section 40 of the Penal Code, treason involves plotting against the president, unlawfully deposing him, or overthrowing the government.

    The penalty for treason is death, while misprision of treason, which involves concealing such plans, can result in life imprisonment.

    Section 43A defines treachery as actions intended to assist enemies, disrupt public order, or endanger lives, also punishable by life imprisonment.

    Political Ramifications and Suspected Manipulation

    In his speech, Ruto suggested that certain individuals are trying to seize power through leaderless protests, manipulating Gen Z for their gain.

    Kikuyu MP Kimani Ichungwa, present at a Kajiado event with Ruto, highlighted leaders waiting for Ruto’s downfall. Ichungwa, in conflict with Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, has raised concerns about internal power struggles.

    Gachagua’s Role and Allegations

    Reports indicate that Gachagua has been questioning Ruto’s health while allegedly running a parallel intelligence unit.

    His recent criticism of National Intelligence Service (NIS) Director Noordin Haji and calls for Haji’s resignation have intensified scrutiny. There are claims that former NIS officers opposed to Ruto are now aiding Gachagua.

    Investigations and Political Fallout

    The Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) has questioned seven officials from Gachagua’s office regarding their alleged involvement in funding the protests. DCI is focusing on cash transactions and suspects the office funded the unrest.

    Gachagua faces potential treason charges, with investigations underway. Key figures under scrutiny include Ferdinand Waititu and Mike Sonko.

    The political landscape remains tense, with Wiper leader Kalonzo Musyoka defending Gachagua and threatening to reject ODM cabinet nominees if impeachment efforts proceed.

    Future Speculations

    Amidst these political maneuvers, there is speculation that Kikuyu leaders see Kalonzo as a viable candidate for the 2027 elections, leveraging their significant vote block. The ongoing political drama reveals deep divisions and power struggles within Kenya’s leadership.

  • Boniface Mwangi Hints at DP Rigathi Gachagua Alleged Involvement in Violent Parliament Invasion

    Boniface Mwangi Hints at DP Rigathi Gachagua Alleged Involvement in Violent Parliament Invasion

    Boniface Mwangi, a renowned activist and photojournalist, has hinted that Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is under state investigation for allegedly financing the violent invasion of Kenya’s Parliament on June 25, 2024.

    The invasion occurred during Gen Z-led protests against the controversial Finance Bill 2024/25, which President William Ruto later withdrew.

    DP Rigathi Gachagua

    Did DP Rigathi Gachagua Play a Role in the Parliament Invasion?

    Mwangi Kiunjuri, Laikipia East MP, revealed in an NTV interview that four politicians from the Mt. Kenya region organized 20,000 protesters, with 3,000 coming from Juja.

    He claimed government funds supported this protest, and authorities were aware of the involved office.

    Kiunjuri’s statements have intensified the political turmoil, challenging the government to address these allegations and restore public order.

    Protests and Government Response

    Protesters clashed with police during the demonstrations, escalating into the storming and partial burning of the Parliament building.

    President Ruto deployed military forces to assist the National Police Service in managing the unrest.

    A government gazette stated, “Pursuant to Article 241 (3) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya… the Kenya Defence Forces is deployed on the 25th June, 2024, in support of the National Police Service in response to the security emergency caused by the ongoing violent protests.”

    Boniface Mwangi’s Allegations

    Boniface Mwangi’s allegations have further fueled the fire. Reports suggest the state is now pursuing those suspected of orchestrating the invasion.

    Several protesters were fatally shot, and many were admitted to Kenyatta National Hospital with bullet wounds, raising the stakes in the political crisis.

    President Ruto’s Address and Withdrawal of the Finance Bill

    President Ruto, in his address to the nation on the night of the incident, condemned the violence, blaming criminals disguised as Gen Z protesters.

    He announced the withdrawal of the Finance Bill the following day to quell the unrest.

    However, DP Gachagua blamed Noordin Haji, Director General of the National Intelligence Service (NIS), for failing to provide timely information about the protests’ magnitude.

    Political Accusations and Responses

    “We have a dysfunctional National Intelligence Service that has exposed the President, the government, and the people of Kenya,” Gachagua stated.

    Amid rampant rumors, government bloggers suggested Gachagua financed the violent protests.

    The government also accused former President Uhuru Kenyatta of sponsoring the chaos, complicating the political landscape further.

    Impact on President Ruto’s Administration

    The ongoing protests have put President Ruto in a difficult position as he struggles to restore order and address demonstrators’ grievances.

    To strengthen his political base, Ruto expanded his cabinet to include vocal politicians allied with Opposition Chief Raila Odinga.

    Kiunjuri’s Statements and Political Polarization

    Kiunjuri’s assertion that youths from Juja were paid to storm Parliament adds complexity to the situation.

    As a key ally of President Ruto, Kiunjuri’s statements have further polarized the political environment.

    The government’s response to these allegations and its ability to manage the ongoing unrest will be critical in determining the stability of Ruto’s administration.

    Controversial Finance Bill and Public Outcry

    The Finance Bill 2024/25, seen as highly punitive by many Kenyans, particularly the youth, proposed tax increases and austerity measures perceived as disproportionately affecting the lower and middle classes.

    The government withdrew the bill in direct response to the public outcry and the violent events that unfolded, but the damage to its credibility was already done.

    Future Implications for DP Rigathi Gachagua

    As the nation grapples with the aftermath of the Parliament invasion and the broader political implications, the spotlight remains on Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

    If proven true, the accusations against him could have far-reaching consequences for his political career and the stability of the current administration.

    The government’s investigation into the funding and organization of the protests will be crucial in uncovering the truth and holding those responsible accountable.

    Call for Transparency and Reform

    Boniface Mwangi’s challenge to Mwangi Kiunjuri and the subsequent public discourse highlight deep-seated issues within Kenya’s political landscape.

    Corruption, misuse of government funds, and political manipulation remain significant concerns. The events of June 25, 2024, have brought these issues to the forefront.

    As Kenya navigates this tumultuous period, the need for transparency, accountability, and genuine political reform has never been more apparent.

    The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining the direction of the country’s political future and the ability of its leaders to address the root causes of the unrest.

    Former Kiambu Governor William Kabogo also responded to Kiunjuri’s post, challenging him to name the obvious person as he sympathized with “RugyG,” cleverly hinting at Rigathi Gachagua, the Deputy President.

  • The Clarion Call Of “One Man, One Shilling” By Kenya’s Deputy President, Rigathi Gachagua

    The Clarion Call Of “One Man, One Shilling” By Kenya’s Deputy President, Rigathi Gachagua

    By Michael Mundia Kamau

    Kenya’s Deputy President, Rigathi Gachagua, should extend his ongoing advocacy for “One Man, One Shilling” to land reform in Kenya, inspired by what happened in the United States of America towards the end of the Civil War in 1865.

    Slavery was abolished in America in 1865 by America’s 16th President, Abraham Lincoln, following which one of Abraham Lincoln’s Army Generals, Gen. William Sherman, passed an ordinance into American law back then, known as “40 acres and a mule,” where each freed slave was to be allocated 40 acres of land, and a mule (a donkey), to start life as free men and free women.

    “40 acres and a mule” was however short lived. Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on 15th April 1865, following which America’s 17th President, Andrew Johnson, revoked “40 acres and a mule,” towards the end of the year 1865.

    “40 acres and a mule,” was not however a bad idea. Mules are not key in ploughing land in Kenya, so were something on the lines of “40 acres and a mule” to be considered in Kenya, it would be more on the lines of “40 acres and an ox,” “40 acres and a camel,” or “40 acres and a boat.”

    The size of Kenya is approximately 580,000 square kilometres (about 143,321,121 acres), and out of this about 143,321,121 acres, some different families, different individuals and different organisations own different parcels of land as big as 100,000 acres.

    Kenya is much smaller than the United States of America, and to all intents and purposes, the United States of America is more than just a country, is a continent, with the time difference between the west coast of the United States of America, and the east coast of the United States of America, being three hours, the very same time difference between West Africa and East Africa.

    Kenya’s population currently stands at about 45 million, and with Kenya’s approximate size in acreage of 143,321,121 million, then “40 acres and a mule,” in Kenya, in the year 2024, would translate to about three acres of land per Kenyan citizen.

    However, about 60% of Kenya’s current population, is below the age of 18 years, so the equivalent of “40 acres and a mule,” in Kenya, would focus on the population of Kenya above the age of 18 years, an approximate current population of 18,000,000, which would therefore bring Kenya’s current approximate equivalent of “40 acres and a mule,” to “8 acres and a mule.”

    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua arrives in Nakuru for the annual Akurino faithful Prayer Conference at Nakuru Boys' High School. [DPCS]
    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua arrives in Nakuru for the annual Akurino faithful Prayer Conference at Nakuru Boys’ High School. [DPCS]
    In principle, land reform in Kenya is much needed and long overdue. Something on the lines of “40 acres and a mule,” should actually have been implemented in Kenya at independence in 1963.

    Waweru Mburu (RIP), was a broadcaster with Kenya’s Royal Media Services/Radio Citizen Kenya, and around the mid-2000s, Waweru Mburu had a popular evening radio show on Radio Citizen Kenya, popular across Kenya back then, where Waweru Mburu regularly used the Kiswahili catchphrase:

    “Kabila Kenya ni mbili tu… tajiri na maskini” (“There are only two tribes in Kenya… the rich and the poor”).

    Was Waweru Mburu (RIP) right? Do Waweru Mburu’s words hold true today in Kenya in the year 2024?

    Before 1964, the United Republic of Tanzania was two separate countries, Tanganyika and Zanzibar.

    Julius Kambarage Nyerere (1922 to 1999), was Prime Minister of Tanganyika from 1961 to 1962, was President of Tanganyika from 1962 to 1964, and was President of the United Republic of Tanzania from 1964 to 1985.

    In 1967, the United Republic of Tanzania adopted “Ujamaa” (“Socialism”), in what is known as “Azimio la Arusha” (“The Arusha Declaration”). “Ujamaa” (“Socialism”), was in place in the United Republic of Tanzania for 18 years, that is, from 1967 to 1985, after which the United Republic of Tanzania reverted back to free market policies/Capitalism.

    When “Ujamaa” was at it’s peak in the United Republic of Tanzania, Julius Kambarage Nyerere had a catchphrase in Kiswahili that went:

    “Ujamaa ni utu, Ubepari ni unyonyaji na uhasama” (“Socialism is human, Capitalism is exploitation and barbaric”).

    As a matter of fact, during “Ujamaa” (“Socialism”) in the United Republic of Tanzania, the evening news on Tanzanian radio (there was only one radio station in Tanzania in those days), would begin with a lion roaring, the significance being that the roaring lion was “Capitalism,” that needed to be “defeated.”

    Was Julius Kambarage Nyerere’s take on “Socialism vs. Capitalism,” right or wrong?

    Do the words of Julius Kambarage Nyerere on “Socialism vs. Capitalism,” hold true in Capitalist countries around the world today in the year 2024, including Kenya?

    Don’t the words of Julius Kambarage Nyerere, Waweru Mburu, and “40 acres and a mule,” point to the same thing, that is, a more equitable and egalitarian society?

    On the 27th of April 1965, the Government of Kenya’s 1st President, Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, unveiled and launched what is known as “Sessional Paper No. 10 of 1965 on African Socialism,” which in Mzee Jomo Kenyatta’s words, was a “blend of Eastern Communism and Western Capitalism, in equal measure.”

    Has Mzee Jomo Kenyatta’s “Sessional Paper No. 10 of 1965 on African Socialism” lived up to expectations? It appears not.

    The current Secretary-General of the Communist Party of Kenya, is a gentleman called Mwandawiro Mghanga, a former Member of Parliament for Wundanyi constituency, and a former Chairman of the Students Organisation of Nairobi University (SONU).

    Mwandawiro Mghanga was a radical who was expelled from the University of Nairobi for his radicalism and activism. For example, 39 years ago on 11th February 1985, when Mwandawiro Mghanga was Chairman of the Students Organisation of Nairobi University (SONU), he committed the treasonable act of “Inspecting a Guard of Honour,” in an act of defiance and radicalism, similar to the “Black Power” salutes made by Americans, Tommie Smith and John Carlos, at the 1968 Mexico Olympic Games.

    Mwandawiro Mghanga was imprisoned for his activism, and upon his release from prison, spent much of the remainder of the 1980s, and a part of the 1990s, in exile in Sweden.

    Mwandawiro Mghanga is much less a radical person nowadays, though as mentioned, he is nowadays the Secretary-General of the Communist Party of Kenya.

    Where have we gone wrong as a country and as a people?

    Does Kenya need to take another look at Mzee Jomo Kenyatta’s “Sessional Paper No. 10 of 1965 on African Socialism?”

    Does Kenya need the likes of Mwandawiro Mghanga and the Communist Party of Kenya to help draw up and design a more equitable and egalitarian blueprint on Kenya’s short term and long term socioeconomic growth and development?

    Does Kenya need to take a look at the United Republic of Tanzania’s “Azimio la Arusha” (“The Arusha Declaration”) of 1967, on “Ujamaa” (“Socialism”)?

    Does Kenya need to take a look at the 1865 ordinance of American Army General, Gen. William Sherman, titled “40 acres and a mule?”

    Over to you, Deputy President, Rigathi Gachagua.

  • Under Siege: Malala and Gachagua Face Turmoil in UDA’s Power Struggle

    Under Siege: Malala and Gachagua Face Turmoil in UDA’s Power Struggle

    Cleophas Malala and Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua are facing significant challenges within the ruling United Democratic Alliance (UDA) Party.

    Recent events have highlighted the escalating power struggles and internal conflicts threatening their positions.

    Malala’s attempt to postpone grassroots elections was swiftly dismissed, highlighting his tenuous authority.

    Meanwhile, Gachagua’s growing insecurity and accusations against President Ruto’s allies underscore the party’s deepening rifts.

    As UDA grapples with these issues, the futures of Malala and Gachagua hang in the balance.

    Malala

    Malala’s Authority Undermined

    The UDA Party Election Board recently dismissed the party’s Secretary General, Cleophas Malala, statement regarding the postponement of grassroots elections in five counties.

    Malala had announced the delay of elections in Nairobi, West Pokot, Narok, Busia, and Homa Bay, but his authority was quickly undermined.

    UDA National Elections Board (NEB) chairperson Anthony Mwaura countered Malala’s notice, insisting that elections would proceed as planned.

    Mwaura cited a ruling by the Political Parties and Disputes Tribunal that barred Malala from interfering with party elections, accusing him of overstepping his boundaries.

    This direct rebuttal to Malala’s authority has significantly weakened his standing within the party.

    Rift Between Malala and Senior Party Members

    The friction does not stop with election scheduling. Just 48 hours before the NEB’s statement, Malala had issued warnings to UDA members Oscar Sudi, Kipchumba Murkomen, and Nyeri Governor Mutahi Kahiga, urging them to stop disrespecting DP Rigathi Gachagua and the party leadership.

    This move backfired spectacularly.

    Oscar Sudi dismissed Malala’s warning via social media, referring to him derisively as an “elevated MCA.” Meanwhile, Governor Kahiga went a step further, calling for Malala’s ouster in the next party elections, further undermining Malala’s authority.

    This open defiance from senior party members has exposed the deep-seated animosities and power struggles within UDA.

    DP Gachagua’s Political Maneuvering

    Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, who has been a pivotal figure in supporting Malala, is also facing his share of challenges.

    Gachagua’s influence in the party, especially in Mt. Kenya, is being questioned. He has been funding Malala’s political activities in the Western region to counter Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi of the Amani National Congress (ANC) Party.

    This move is seen as part of a broader strategy to secure Gachagua’s political future amid fears that President William Ruto might favor Mudavadi as his successor in 2032.

    Gachagua’s attempts to solidify his position as the Mt. Kenya kingpin are being undermined by key allies of President Ruto, such as Oscar Sudi.

    These allies are reportedly fueling young politicians to challenge Gachagua’s authority as early as the 2027 elections, which would significantly weaken his influence in the 2032 succession politics.

    Internal Strife and the Search for a New Political Home

    The UDA is becoming increasingly fragmented. There are reports that Gachagua is considering forming a new political outfit and has begun reaching out to potential allies.

    This move indicates his growing frustration and sense of isolation within UDA. Gachagua has accused some of President Ruto’s closest allies of being used to undermine his authority.

    The Future of UDA

    Amid these internal conflicts, the UDA faces a critical juncture. The public dismissal of Malala’s authority and the brewing dissent against Gachagua threaten to weaken the party’s cohesion.

    Anthony Mwaura’s firm stance on continuing with the scheduled elections underscores the party’s intention to maintain order, but the underlying tensions suggest more significant issues at play.

    Malala insists that the ruling party is intact and denies any cracks. However, the open calls for his removal and the disrespect shown to DP Gachagua tell a different story.

    The UDA’s ability to manage these internal conflicts will be crucial in determining its future stability.

    In conclusion, the internal strife within the UDA, characterized by the undermining of Cleophas Malala and Rigathi Gachagua, reflects deeper political machinations and power struggles.

    The coming months will be critical in shaping its trajectory and maintaining its dominance in Kenya’s political landscape.

  • Chaos In UDA: Cleophas Malala Warns Kuria, Murkomen To Stop Attacking Gachagua Or Resign, Threatens Rebels

    Chaos In UDA: Cleophas Malala Warns Kuria, Murkomen To Stop Attacking Gachagua Or Resign, Threatens Rebels

    The United Democratic Alliance (UDA) has issued a stern warning to several of its members, including Cabinet Secretaries, to either focus on their official duties or resign from their positions to engage in politics. The party’s Secretary General, Cleophas Malala, expressed concern over the recent behavior of some elected leaders, which he deemed disrespectful to the party leadership and the presidency.

    Speaking upon his return from a trip to China, where the UDA delegation engaged in discussions with the Communist Party of China on matters of mutual interest, Malala emphasized the importance of party unity and discipline. He specifically called out Githunguri Member of Parliament, Hon. Gathoni Wa Muchomba, Kapseret Member of Parliament, Hon. Oscar Sudi, and Nyeri Governor, Hon. Mutahi Kahiga, for their recent conduct that undermines the party’s unity and disrespects the leadership.

    Malala issued a stern warning to these leaders, urging them to desist from such actions with immediate effect. “Failure to do so would result in disciplinary action being taken.” He said. He also addressed Cabinet Secretaries who have been involving themselves in political activities, contrary to the law, which requires them to remain apolitical.

    Malala specifically went all out for Hon. Moses Kuria, the Cabinet Secretary for Public Service, Gender, and Affirmative Action, and Hon. Kipchumba Murkomen, Cabinet Secretary for Roads and Transport, stating that their primary responsibility is to serve the people within their respective dockets. “Should they wish to engage in politics, they are welcome to resign and join the political arena.” He added.

    Malala also urged young politicians within the UDA who have prematurely begun their campaigns for 2032 to halt these activities, as they not only distract from their responsibilities but also disrespect the trust placed in them by the electorate. “The party will take stern disciplinary action against those who continue with these premature campaigns.” He said.

    Malala emphasized the importance of party discipline and respect for party hierarchy, stating that any form of indiscipline will not be tolerated within the ranks of the UDA party.

    Ruto-Gachagua rift

    Malala’s statement comes in the backdrop of widening rift between President Ruto and his DP Gachagua that has seen politicians allied to both leaders engage in fierce exchanges in the recent past.

    There are reports that Gachagua has already booked a political outfit as he plots to exit UDA, further affirming the fears that his relationship with Ruto is in tatters.

    Gachagua’s new party

    According to reports in local newspapers, Gachagua is collaborating with The New Democrats (TND) officials to explore options outside UDA, while Nyeri Governor Mutahi Kahiga warns President Ruto’s support in Mt Kenya could be threatened by attacks.

    The DP is reportedly reaching out to political players, including a former top government official, for a possible political deal. Gachagua has acquired a political party and has approached a Western Kenyan governor (Natembeya) to join his team. The DP has accused some allies of President Ruto in his Rift Valley backyard of being used to undermine him. Another list of operatives is being used to fight the DP, including youthful groups including Ndindi Nyoro who believe it is time to assert themselves in leadership positions.

    G7

    The DP is also facing opposition from the G7 group, led by Kirinyaga Governor Anne Waiguru, who is aiming to increase the number of female governors in the next election. The governor, Kahiga, believes that Waiguru is using ‘G7’ as a strategy to strategically place herself as a possible replacement for the DP. President Ruto has previously clashed with the DP on having a woman as the running mate for a man in the next election, which has unsettled Gachagua, who fears “betrayal.”

    Kahiga believes that President Ruto is a wise politician who will not change his running mate but warns that changing his deputy could risk losing the support he enjoys in the region. The DP’s claims of being fought by Ruto’s close associates and the “women factor” in the 2027 race have also upset him.

    Mt Kenya’s politicians, including Githunguri MP Gathoni wa Muchomba and former Kiambu governor Ferdinand Waititu, are calling for DP Gachagua to declare his interest in the top seat in 2027. They believe the problems facing the region are linked to a scheme to divide the country. Mountain politics are unique, often bringing together threats to its welfare or betrayal. Mr Kahiga described DP Gachagua as a battle-hardened political soldier, stating that he will survive relentless attacks and prove his loyalty to only one leader at a time.