Tag: Didmus Barasa

  • MP Barasa’s Helicopter, Six Luxury Cars Seized Over Sh4.4 Million Legal Debt

    MP Barasa’s Helicopter, Six Luxury Cars Seized Over Sh4.4 Million Legal Debt

    Kimilili legislator’s assets attached after failing to pay law firm that successfully defended him in 2022 election petition

    A helicopter and six luxury vehicles belonging to Kimilili Member of Parliament Didmus Barasa have been seized by court-appointed auctioneers over an unpaid legal debt of Sh4.4 million.

    Betico Auctioneers attached the helicopter, valued at Sh2 million, and the vehicles worth between Sh500,000 and Sh1 million each, along with various household items to recover money owed to Nchogu Omwanza & Nyasimi Advocates.

    The law firm represented Mr. Barasa in a 2022 election petition filed against him by lawyer Bryan Khaemba, which challenged his victory in the Kimilili constituency.

    The firm successfully defended the MP, with the High Court in Bungoma dismissing the petition on November 22, 2022.

    Court documents reveal that Mr. Barasa agreed to pay the law firm Sh5 million for their services.

    However, he only paid Sh1 million upfront, leaving a balance of Sh4 million that has remained unpaid for over two years.

    “We have proclaimed the judgment debtor’s movable properties and left them in their custody pending their action within seven days from the date hereof. After that, we will remove them to our yard for sale to recover the amount owed and our costs,” stated a notice from the auctioneers.

    Lead counsel Omwanza Ombati said the firm made several attempts to collect the outstanding balance without success, forcing them to seek court intervention.

    In his defense, Mr. Barasa argued that the advocates were not entitled to the full balance since the election petition did not proceed to a full trial but was struck out at the preliminary stage.

    However, Justice Josephine Mong’are rejected this argument in a ruling delivered in December 2024, stating that legal fees become due and payable once a law firm agrees to represent a client and deploys its services, regardless of the case outcome.

    “I find and hold that the balance of fees amounting to Sh4,000,000 is due and payable to the advocates as per the said advocate-client fee agreement,” Justice Mong’are ruled.

    The judge characterized Mr. Barasa’s defense as “a sham and a mere denial that failed to raise any triable issues or valid challenge to the case.”

    The law firm is now demanding Sh4.46 million, comprising the principal amount of Sh4 million plus interest of Sh466,410 that has accumulated over the two-year period.

    The seized assets include luxury vehicles that could potentially cover the debt if sold at auction.

    The helicopter, being the most valuable single asset, represents nearly half of the total amount owed.

    This latest seizure adds to a series of financial disputes involving the controversial MP.

    Public records show Mr. Barasa has faced multiple debt-related court cases in recent years, raising questions about his financial management.

    The MP has been in the spotlight for various reasons, including previous court cases and investigations by the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) over alleged extortion related to road tender awards.

    The parties are expected to return to court next week for an update on the matter.

    Mr. Barasa has seven days from the attachment notice to either settle the debt or risk having his assets sold at public auction.

    Legal experts say the case sets an important precedent for professional service providers seeking to recover unpaid fees from high-profile clients.

    It demonstrates that contractual agreements for legal services are enforceable regardless of the client’s status or the manner in which cases conclude.

    The seizure notice allows Mr. Barasa to retain custody of the assets temporarily, but failure to respond within the stipulated timeframe will result in their removal to the auctioneer’s yard for public sale.

    If sold, the proceeds will go toward settling the Sh4.4 million debt plus any additional costs incurred during the recovery process.

  • How Didmus Barasa Defrauded a Businesswoman of Sh2M When Buying His Chopper

    How Didmus Barasa Defrauded a Businesswoman of Sh2M When Buying His Chopper

    Kimilili Member of Parliament, Didmus Wekesa Barasa Mutua, has yet to repay a businesswoman the Sh2 million he allegedly defrauded from her—money purportedly used to purchase a helicopter from Malaysia.

    This follows his failure to respond to our inquiries regarding his plans to refund the amount, which he previously referred to as a “soft loan,” even after being summoned by the EACC last year.

    Didmus Barasa’s Helicopter Purchase

    Our findings indicate that MP Mutua had initially promised to repay the money but later reverted to his pattern of deceit and fraudulent behavior.

    Barasa’s case has sparked significant public outrage and raised serious concerns about the ethical conduct of public officials. Experts are now cautioning Bungoma County residents against electing him as governor in 2027.

    “He is a fraudster, as evidenced by the multiple fraud cases he faces across the country. Before seeking the governorship, he should start by respecting women—repaying the Sh2 million he owes this businesswoman,” said a local leader.

    Barasa, the MP for Kimilili, has been embroiled in previous controversies, with his alleged criminal activities further tarnishing his reputation. Despite this, he has somehow retained his political position.

    According to sources, Barasa approached the businesswoman for a Sh2 million loan, claiming it was needed as a facilitation fee for a business trip to Malaysia. Trusting his word, she transferred the money to his account.

    Documents in our possession confirm that Barasa received the funds and allegedly used them to purchase a helicopter.

    To date, despite admitting to taking the money, the MP has refused to repay it.

    The evidence, including financial records and witness testimonies, points to the helicopter purchase. This alleged fraud not only constitutes a breach of trust but also raises serious legal and ethical concerns.

  • ‪Impeachment Motion Against Gachagua Surpasses 117-Signature Threshold For Tabling‬

    ‪Impeachment Motion Against Gachagua Surpasses 117-Signature Threshold For Tabling‬

    The much-anticipated impeachment motion against Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua has sailed past the 117-signature threshold required for the tabling before the House next.

    Kimilili MP Didmus Barasa, who announced his intention to move the motion on Thursday, said he had collected 242 signatures from lawmakers in support of the bid.

    Should the motion find its way to the National Assembly, Barasa, an ally of President William Ruto, will require 233 votes to pass.

    “I am the sponsor of the impeachment motion against the Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and so far, I have received 242 signatures and an additional six MPs were awaiting to append their signatures,” he told Capital News on phone.

    Article 150 of the Constitution dictates grounds for impeaching a Deputy President as gross violation of the Constitution, suspicion for committing a crime and gross misconduct.

    Cracks between President Ruto and his deputy has been widening by the day with the impeachment motion marking the latest escalation after Gachagua called out the Head of State in a televised interview on September 20.

    Lobbying efforts

    Intense lobbying has been ongoing in the corridors of Parliament by factions within the ruling coalition as both political camps seek to sway the tide their way in the ongoing political squabbles.

    “I will prosecute the impeachment motion on the floor of the house and by close of business today I will be presenting the signatures to the office of the speaker,” Barasa said.

    “Its upon the speaker to consider the motion next week and make communication of having received the impeachment motion after which I will do what I do best by prosecuting the motion on the floor of the house,” he added.

    Lawmakers forming the western region caucus held a Kamkunji Thursday afternoon to deliberate the way forward in talks that reached consensus on Gachagua’s ouster.

    A source suggested plans to table the motion as soon as October 1.

    “That one (impeachment) we have agreed is sealed but we now await for the impeachment motion to be tabled before the House next week,” an MP who sought anonymity said.

    Article 145 states that a member of the National Assembly may move to impeach the Deputy President if at least one-third of the members support the motion.

    Upon approval fro tabling, the mover requires 233 MPs for the motion to move to the Senate for consideration.

    The Speaker of the National Assembly is requred to notify the Speaker of the Senate which will then convene within seven days.

    In considering the motion, the Senate may form an eleven-member special committee to investigate the allegations.

    After granting the Deputy President audience, the committee will transmit its recommendations to the Senate within ten days where its report will require a two-thirds backing for the impeachment to stand.