Tag: Dennis Onyango

  • Raila Aide Drops Bombshell: Babu Owino Was Never Part Of ‘Jeshi Ya Baba’ Exit Plan

    Raila Aide Drops Bombshell: Babu Owino Was Never Part Of ‘Jeshi Ya Baba’ Exit Plan

    Dennis Onyango, the man who served as Raila Odinga’s press secretary and personal spokesman for decades, has fired a political grenade into the heart of the post-Raila succession battle, revealing in explosive detail that Embakasi East MP Babu Owino was never part of the late opposition chief’s carefully constructed exit strategy from the broad-based government arrangement with President William Ruto.

    Speaking on Citizen TV’s Monday Report on March 30, Onyango did not mince words.

    While confirming that Senate Minority Leader James Orengo and ODM Secretary-General Edwin Sifuna were deliberate fixtures in Raila’s contingency architecture, he drew a sharp, categorical line at the politician who has been loudest in claiming Baba’s mantle.

    “He never had Babu anywhere in his thinking. He thought he was going to be a trouble,” Onyango said of the Nairobi lawmaker who has publicly declared, “baada ya Baba ni Babu.”

    The disclosure strips Owino of an aura he has been cultivating since Raila’s death, one that positioned him alongside Sifuna and Orengo as the vanguard of the “Jeshi ya Baba” militant resistance.

    Onyango had earlier, in February, affirmed that Raila never named a preferred successor, trusting party institutions to determine who would emerge.  Monday’s interview went further, explicitly separating the wheat from the chaff.

    Onyango’s revelations build directly on disclosures made days earlier by Raila’s former legal advisor Paul Mwangi.

    Mwangi, speaking in an exclusive interview on Saturday, March 28, claimed that Raila deliberately positioned Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna as an “exit plan” while cooperating with President William Ruto, carefully structuring his political moves to ensure he was never boxed into a single corner. 

    Mwangi described the current ODM internal turmoil as a clash between two factions that have long coexisted within Raila’s orbit: a “political-diplomatic” wing and a “militant” wing, arguing that both sides legitimately reflect different aspects of his leadership style. 

    Raila, Mwangi insisted, would never engage in anything without an exit strategy. If things did not work out, or if there was a clash on the cooperative side, he would turn to the militant faction and rally them as a fallback. 

    Onyango on Monday confirmed that logic, then added the crucial asterisk that Mwangi had left hanging. Yes, Sifuna and Orengo were part of the plan. Babu was not. He was a liability calculation, not a strategic asset.

    The timing is devastating for Owino.

    In February, he had told a local TV station that Raila’s final message was that ODM must produce a presidential candidate and should not be fully in the broad-based government, presenting himself as the faithful interpreter of Baba’s vision.  He has also publicly declared his interest in the ODM party leadership.

    Onyango’s assessment now positions Owino as a man freelancing on a brand that its owner apparently never fully endorsed for him.

    The broader context in which these disclosures land is one of acute ODM crisis.

    Dr Oburu Oginga, who ascended to the party leadership following Raila’s death, has staked his authority on institutional consolidation, signalling he will not seek elective office in 2027 but will instead serve as a custodian of the movement. 

    That transition, however, has been anything but smooth. At the Linda Mwananchi faction’s parallel “People’s NDC” at Ufungamano House on March 27, Sifuna openly rejected serving under the new leadership structure, declaring he would not be “the SG of mediocrity” and telling Oburu to find his own Secretary-General. 

    Sifuna, who appeared to have accepted his fate after his ouster, drew a firm line against serving under what he called a new leadership lacking credibility, while honoring his tenure under Raila as the greatest privilege of his political life. 

    The Ufungamano meeting was briefly disrupted when police officers attempted to gain access to the venue, prompting Sifuna to appeal for calm and challenge the officers directly from the podium. 

    The layered disclosures illuminate, perhaps more vividly than any previous account, the architecture of Raila’s political genius.

    He maintained parallel power centres, ensured no single alliance left him without leverage, and ran a diplomatic track alongside a militant one.

    Both the pro-Ruto and anti-Ruto camps within ODM have claimed to represent Raila’s wishes, with outcomes likely to have far-reaching ramifications on the political landscape heading to 2027. 

    What Onyango has now clarified is that not everyone who claimed a seat at that table was actually invited.

    For Babu Owino, the revelation is more than a bruised ego moment.

    It lands as he positions himself as a credible Nairobi gubernatorial aspirant and potential ODM party leader, ambitions that depend substantially on the legitimacy that Raila’s posthumous endorsement, real or implied, confers.

    That endorsement, according to the man who knew Raila best, was never there.

    The question now roiling ODM’s corridors is who will inherit the militant faction’s street firepower, and whether Sifuna and Orengo, the two figures Raila actually trusted with his escape hatch, can harness that energy without the maestro who designed the trap.

  • Wash Wash: City Lawyer Dennis Onyango Accused of Defrauding Norwegian Investor of Sh52 Million

    Wash Wash: City Lawyer Dennis Onyango Accused of Defrauding Norwegian Investor of Sh52 Million

    A Norwegian businessman has approached the Kenyan courts seeking urgent orders to freeze bank accounts belonging to a Nairobi-based law firm, claiming he was defrauded of over Sh52 million in a botched gold investment deal.

    John Birger Silheim filed the case against lawyer Dennis Onyango, who operates under the name Dennis Onyango & Associates, alleging that the advocate has refused to return USD 403,097 (approximately Sh52.2 million) deposited for a gold purchase transaction that never materialized.

    The case, which has been pending for over a year, has seen the Norwegian investor express frustration over repeated delays in court proceedings. Through his legal team comprising Felix Keaton, Vincent Yegon, and Dr. Philip Lagat, Silheim questioned why the matter has remained unresolved despite its urgency.

    According to court documents, the Norwegian businessman made four separate deposits between August and December 2023 from his personal bank account in Norway directly into Onyango’s Stanbic Bank account at the Chiromo branch. The deposits were made in amounts of USD 87,097, USD 86,000, USD 130,000, and USD 100,000 respectively, all intended for gold procurement purposes.

    Silheim told the court that since the proposed gold transaction failed to materialize, there was no longer any legal basis for the law firm to retain his funds. He claims that despite repeated requests, Onyango’s firm has “failed, refused, and neglected” to return the money.

    The investor has expressed concerns that the lawyer may have already used or transferred the funds for personal benefit. “I am afraid that lawyer Onyango may transfer, use, misuse, expend and or deal with the monies in one way or another without the authority of the applicant, hence occasioning a massive loss to me,” Silheim stated in his court filing.

    Adding to the complexity of the case, the Norwegian alleges that Onyango presented him with fraudulent documents, including a forged letter purportedly from Stanbic Bank. The investor claims the bank has since denied issuing such correspondence, raising questions about potential document forgery.

    Silheim is seeking court orders to freeze the specific account held at Stanbic Bank’s Chiromo/Westlands branch pending the hearing and determination of the main case. He has also requested the court to compel the bank to provide a comprehensive statement of account activities.

    The case highlights growing concerns about investment fraud targeting foreign investors in Kenya’s gold trade sector. For nearly two years, the Norwegian has been pursuing legal remedies to recover his substantial investment, while calling on Stanbic Bank to verify how their official letterhead and contact information were allegedly used in the disputed transaction.

    The matter remains pending before the Milimani Law Courts, with the investor maintaining he has strong prospects of success in recovering his funds.