Tag: Boniface Mwangi

  • Baraton College Russia Labour Programme Accused of Recruiting Kenyans into Ukraine War

    Baraton College Russia Labour Programme Accused of Recruiting Kenyans into Ukraine War

    A private college in Kenya’s Rift Valley has come under sharp scrutiny after launching a labour export programme to Russia, with fears growing that desperate young jobseekers from communities already scarred by migration scams could be walking into a war zone without knowing it.

    Activist and 2027 presidential aspirant Boniface Mwangi ignited the debate on Monday with a post on social media.

    Mwangi accused Baraton College, run by Director Bethwel Kimutai, of operating as a recruitment agency funnelling youths from Nandi and Uasin Gishu counties to Russia.

    These are the same communities where residents lost an estimated Sh1.1 billion in a botched government-linked scheme that promised work and study placements in Finland and Canada that never materialised.

    “Either the parents don’t know their children are being sent to a war zone, or they are simply desperate,” Mwangi wrote. “This Kasongo policy of sending our sons and daughters to slave-like jobs abroad must stop.”

    Baraton College, which operates campuses in Eldoret and Kapsabet, openly promotes its “MAJUU” or “Twende Majuu” (Let’s Go Abroad) labour programme on Facebook, TikTok and its dedicated website.

    The college has held prayer and dedication services for at least 14 documented cohorts departing for Russia.

    It advertises roles as meat processors, packaging operators and livestock workers on two-year contracts that include food, accommodation and transport.

    For those without qualifications, it offers a one-month Certificate in Meat Processing. Advertised salaries range from approximately Sh77,000 to Sh79,000 per month.

    Screenshot

    The college frames the programme in unambiguously glowing terms. One post declares: “Through our exclusive Russia Work Program, students and staff now have the opportunity to work, grow, and thrive beyond borders.” Videos show smiling candidates receiving blessings before departure.

    The timing could not be more alarming.

    Just days before Mwangi’s post, Kenya’s National Intelligence Service briefed Parliament that more than 1,000 Kenyans had been recruited to fight on Russia’s side in Ukraine, five times the government’s previous estimate.

    Of those, 89 were confirmed on the frontline as of this month, 39 had been hospitalised and 28 were missing in action.

    The NIS found that recruitment agencies had colluded with rogue Kenyan airport staff, immigration officials and personnel at both the Russian Embassy in Nairobi and the Kenyan Embassy in Moscow to facilitate travel.

    Recruits left on tourist visas and transited through Turkey or the UAE. After Kenya tightened surveillance at Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, traffickers rerouted them through Uganda, South Africa and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    The anatomy of Russia’s recruitment machine targeting Africans has been laid bare in a series of international investigations.

    Moscow has deployed an elaborate web of tactics that security analysts say are specifically designed to exploit economic desperation.

    The Russian Ministry of Defence has contracted informal recruiters across Africa who are paid per head: according to BBC investigations, handlers receive up to 150,000 roubles for every foreigner signed up, compared to 50,000 for a Russian national.

    A website called “Fight for Russia,” launched in January 2025 and hosted in Russia, carries an online application form for any foreigner wishing to join the war.

    Fake Facebook pages, Telegram channels, WhatsApp groups and even gaming apps such as Discord carry offers promising high salaries, visas, housing and eventual Russian citizenship.

    Investigators from the International Network of Private and Advanced Civilian Technology, known as INPACT, found that Russian Federal Security Service-linked shell companies coordinated much of the operation, using travel agencies as logistical cover, local pro-Russian influencers as recruitment ambassadors and former recruits to lure their own communities.

    One of the most documented recruiters, a former Russian teacher named Polina Alexandrovna Azarnykh, ran a Facebook group that once helped Arab students study in Moscow. She now runs a Telegram channel through which she has posted hundreds of invitations to men from Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Morocco and Nigeria to join the Russian army.

    The playbook applied to Kenyans is almost always the same. Promises of work as security guards, warehouse staff or logistics personnel are made with salaries of up to Sh3 million as a signing bonus.

    Recruits enter Russia on tourist visas, and their passports are confiscated on arrival.

    They are given weeks, sometimes just three, of basic military training before being deployed to frontline positions in Ukraine.

    Military contracts, written entirely in Cyrillic, are signed by men who cannot read them. Ukrainian officials have described those contracts as “equivalent to signing a death sentence.” One Kenyan who spoke to CNN recalled that a Russian soldier forced him at gunpoint to hand over his bank card and PIN, draining nearly Sh2 million from his bonus account.

    Kenyan carpenter Patrick Kwoba, who paid a local agent Sh80,000 on the promise of a Sh3 million signing bonus, told CNN he survived four months of combat in Ukraine before escaping to St. Petersburg and making it to the Kenyan Embassy in Moscow.

    He still needs surgery to remove shrapnel fragments from his body.

    For those who try to escape, or fall wounded, the prognosis is grim.

    A security analyst quoted by Al Jazeera was blunt: “What the Russian military is looking for are bodies, just bodies to fill holes in the ranks and keep the war going.” Ukrainian commanders on the front have said African recruits are sent on “meat assaults,” hurled at fortified positions so that more experienced Russian troops can advance behind them.

    No evidence has emerged directly linking Baraton College participants to combat.

    Defenders of the programme online argue that similar agriculture and livestock placements reportedly existed before Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. Yet the parallels with the methods used to lure other Kenyans are glaring.

    The agriculture and food processing sectors being targeted by Baraton’s programme are the same sectors that intelligence reports say Russia has strained through military mobilisation, and the same sectors used to justify tourist-visa travel before recruits are coerced into signing military contracts.

    The earlier Rift Valley scandal that Mwangi references involved former Uasin Gishu Governor, now Senator, Jackson Mandago and associates, who allegedly collected millions from parents for nonexistent placements in Europe. Court proceedings are ongoing.

    Neither Baraton College nor Director Kimutai had issued any public response to the allegations as of Tuesday.

    The college’s website continues to list its MAJUU portal prominently.

    Families of Kenyans already on the front lines have staged protests in Nairobi demanding repatriation. Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has said the government had facilitated the return of 27 Kenyans from the front and would raise the issue of fraudulent recruitment at a planned meeting with Russian officials.

    President William Ruto has personally spoken with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and asked for the release of any Kenyan in Ukrainian custody. The Russian Embassy in Nairobi insists that no illegal recruitment has taken place and that the reports amount to a “coordinated propaganda campaign.”

    Kenya’s youth unemployment rate remains one of the highest in the region, making overseas job offers, however dubious, almost impossible to resist for many families.

    As fresh cohorts prepare to fly out from the Rift Valley with prayers and blessings, the question hanging over Baraton College and every other institution operating in this space is the same one Mwangi posed: do the parents know where their children are really going?

  • State Drops Terror Charges Against Boniface Mwangi, Activist Released on Sh1 Million Bond

    State Drops Terror Charges Against Boniface Mwangi, Activist Released on Sh1 Million Bond

    The Directorate of Criminal Investigations has backed down from pursuing terrorism-related charges against prominent activist Boniface Mwangi, instead opting to prosecute him on firearms violations following his weekend arrest.

    In a dramatic turn of events, Mwangi was released on a Sh1 million bond after appearing before Kahawa Magistrates Court on Monday.

    In a significant shift that highlights the often contentious relationship between Kenya’s security apparatus and civil society activists, the DCI has amended the charges against Mwangi to focus on alleged possession of ammunition without proper licensing.

    The move comes just two days after the activist’s arrest on Saturday at his Lukenya home in Machakos County, which had initially sparked fears of another crackdown on dissenting voices in the country.

    Principal Magistrate Gideon Kiage granted Mwangi’s release, stating that “the accused person may be set at liberty upon securing a personal bond of Sh1 million with one surety of similar amount.”

    The activist pleaded not guilty to all charges brought against him, maintaining his innocence throughout the proceedings.

    According to the charge sheet obtained by local media, Mwangi now faces two specific allegations under the Firearms Act.

    The first charge accuses him of possessing “noxious substances,” specifically three teargas canisters, without lawful authority on July 19th at the Mageuzi Hub in Nairobi.

    The second alleges he was found with one round of 7.62x51mm blank ammunition, also without proper certification.

    The investigation began when DCI officers raided Mwangi’s home and office, claiming the arrest was connected to his suspected involvement in coordinating and facilitating acts deemed to constitute terrorism under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.

    Detectives alleged that Mwangi played a key logistical and financial role in the June 25 protests, during which scores were killed, public property was destroyed, and security officers were injured.

    During their operations, authorities claimed to have recovered an extensive collection of items from both his residence and his office at Mageuzi Hub in Hurlingham.

    The haul allegedly included several electronic devices, nine assorted external hard drives, two laptops, company seals for Brave Media Ltd and Courage Ltd, a company stamp, six cheque books, and copies of stamp duty documents, in addition to the teargas canisters and ammunition that form the basis of the current charges.

    However, Mwangi’s legal team has strongly disputed these claims.

    His lawyer, Njanja Maina, dismissed the allegations as false on Sunday, characterizing the purported recovery of teargas canisters and ammunition as a fabricated scheme designed to justify terrorism charges against his client.

    The defense team’s skepticism appears to have been vindicated by the prosecution’s subsequent decision to abandon the terror-related allegations.

    The decision to drop the terror charges represents a notable retreat by investigators, who had initially indicated they would pursue the more serious allegations that could have carried significantly harsher penalties.

    Terrorism-related charges in Kenya often result in lengthy court battles and, if proven, can lead to substantial prison sentences that effectively silence activists for years.

    Mwangi’s legal representatives are now seeking to have the case transferred to Milimani Law Courts, arguing that since the terrorism charges have been dropped, the matter should be heard at a venue more appropriate for the reduced charges.

    This tactical move suggests the defense team believes they can secure better outcomes in a different judicial setting.

    The case has already drawn sharp criticism from human rights organizations, who view the initial terror charges as part of a broader pattern of intimidation against civil society leaders.

    The fact that authorities have now scaled back to firearms violations suggests the evidence for terrorism-related offenses may have been insufficient to sustain such serious allegations.

    For Mwangi, who has built a reputation as one of Kenya’s most vocal government critics and has faced numerous arrests and court cases over his activism, this latest legal challenge represents another chapter in his ongoing confrontation with state authorities.

    His supporters argue that the charges, even in their reduced form, are designed to hamper his activism and serve as a warning to other critics of the government.

    This development unfolds against a backdrop of increasing tensions between the government and civil society groups, particularly following the deadly June protests that rocked the country.

    Activists frequently find themselves facing various charges that critics argue are politically motivated, with the state often invoking security concerns to justify heavy-handed responses to dissent.

    The DCI’s decision to retreat from terror charges may signal either prosecutorial pragmatism or recognition that such serious allegations require substantially stronger evidence than what investigators currently possessed.

    However, the substantial bond amount and the continued pursuit of firearms charges suggest authorities remain determined to maintain legal pressure on the activist.

    As Mwangi walks free pending trial, the case serves as a litmus test for Kenya’s commitment to protecting civic space and the rights of activists to engage in legitimate political discourse.

    The outcome will be closely watched by both local and international human rights observers as an indicator of the country’s democratic trajectory.

  • DCI Links Activist Boniface Mwangi To Terrorism Following June Protests

    DCI Links Activist Boniface Mwangi To Terrorism Following June Protests

    Prominent activist Boniface Mwangi was arrested yesterday evening at his Lukenya residence in Machakos County by detectives from the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) in connection with alleged facilitation of terrorist activities during the June 25, 2025 protests.

    The arrest marks a significant escalation in the government’s crackdown on individuals linked to the recent anti-government demonstrations that commemorated the first anniversary of the Gen Z protests against tax hikes.

    The June 25 protests, which saw thousands of Kenyans take to the streets in at least 17 counties, were met with a heavy-handed police response that left at least 16 people dead and over 400 injured according to human rights organizations.

    According to the DCI report, detectives conducting the arrest recovered two mobile phones, a laptop, and several notebooks from Mwangi’s home, known as Courage Base.

    The investigation then extended to his office at Mageuzi Hub on Rose Avenue in Hurlingham, where a comprehensive search yielded what authorities describe as significant evidence.

    The items recovered from the office search paint a picture of what investigators suggest was an organized operation.

    Among the seized materials were nine assorted external hard drives, two additional laptops, company seals for Brave Media Ltd and Courage Ltd, a company stamp, and six cheque books alongside copies of stamp duty documents.

    Perhaps most concerning to authorities were two unused tear gas canisters and one 7.62mm blank round found on the premises.

    Mwangi’s wife, Njeri Mwangi, confirmed the arrest in a video posted on social media, stating that unidentified individuals believed to be police officers stormed their home and took her husband away, citing terrorism and arson as the reasons for his arrest.

    The dramatic nature of the arrest has sparked immediate concern from human rights activists and civil society organizations.

    Hussein Khalid, Executive Director of Vocal human rights organization, initially reported that Mwangi had gone missing after being bundled into what he described as the DCI’s “notorious Subaru” following the office search.

    However, it has since been confirmed that Mwangi is being held at Pangani Police Station, where he is undergoing processing ahead of his expected arraignment tomorrow, Monday, July 21, 2025.

    The charges Mwangi faces are serious and could carry significant penalties under Kenya’s anti-terrorism legislation.

    The DCI has indicated he will be charged with offenses related to the facilitation of terrorist acts and unlawful possession of ammunition.

    Unused teargas canister recovered from Boniface Mwangi’s office.
    Unused teargas canister recovered from Boniface Mwangi’s office.

    These charges stem from his alleged connection to the violent turn that some of the June 25 protests took in various parts of the country.

    The June 25 demonstrations were organized to mark the first anniversary of the Gen Z protests that originally opposed government tax hikes, and were characterized by significant violence that resulted in multiple deaths and hundreds of injuries.

    The protests had evolved from their original focus on tax policy to broader concerns about police brutality and governance issues under President William Ruto’s administration.

    The arrest of Mwangi, a well-known photographer-turned-activist who has been a vocal critic of government policies, represents the most high-profile detention in the ongoing crackdown on protest organizers and participants.

    His work has consistently challenged government actions, and he has been a prominent figure in Kenya’s civil society movement for over a decade.

    Legal experts and human rights defenders have already begun questioning the basis for the terrorism charges, particularly given Mwangi’s known advocacy for peaceful protest and democratic accountability.

    The discovery of tear gas canisters and ammunition at his office will likely be central to the prosecution’s case, though questions remain about how these items came to be there and their intended use.

    The timing of the arrest, coming nearly a month after the June 25 protests, suggests that authorities have been conducting a sustained investigation into the events of that day.

    The protests resulted in significant property damage, with businesses in 25 counties affected and extensive looting reported in Nairobi’s central business district.

    As Mwangi prepares for his court appearance tomorrow, the case is being closely watched by both local and international human rights organizations as a test of Kenya’s commitment to democratic freedoms and the right to peaceful protest.

    The outcome could have significant implications for civil society activism in the country and the broader space for political dissent under the current administration.

    The charges represent some of the most serious allegations leveled against a prominent activist in recent years, and the case is expected to be closely contested in court as lawyers prepare to challenge both the evidence presented and the interpretation of Mwangi’s actions as constituting terrorist activity.

  • Activists Boniface Mwangi and Agather Atuhaire Seek Sh129 Million Each In Regional Court Case Over Tanzania Torture

    Activists Boniface Mwangi and Agather Atuhaire Seek Sh129 Million Each In Regional Court Case Over Tanzania Torture

    NAIROBI, Kenya – Prominent human rights activists Boniface Mwangi of Kenya and Agather Atuhaire of Uganda have filed a major lawsuit at the East African Court of Justice demanding $1,000,000 (approx Ksh129 million) each in compensation after alleging torture and illegal deportation by Tanzanian authorities in May 2025.

    The case, filed alongside seven regional civil society organizations, accuses Tanzania of orchestrating their abduction, torture, unlawful detention and deportation while holding Kenya and Uganda responsible for failing to protect their citizens and uphold regional laws.

    According to court documents, the two activists had lawfully traveled to Tanzania to observe the treason trial of opposition leader and lawyer Tundu Lissu when they were abducted by unknown individuals from their hotel in Dar es Salaam between May 19 and 23, 2025.

    The activists allege they were first taken to the Immigration Department and Central Police Station before being removed without legal explanation to an unknown location where they were subjected to physical and psychological torture, including sexual violence.

    They were later dumped across borders, with Atuhaire returned to Uganda and Mwangi to Kenya.

    “When a state goes rogue, the law must step in to protect its victims. What happened to us was evil, and was meant to silence us, but we refused to be silenced,” Mwangi said, adding that the case aims to give other victims of state brutality courage to seek justice.

    The lawsuit names the Attorneys General of Tanzania, Uganda and Kenya, as well as the Secretary General of the East African Community as respondents.

    The applicants argue that despite wide media coverage of their disappearance, both Kenyan and Ugandan governments failed to take meaningful action to secure their release or hold Tanzanian authorities accountable.

    The activists claim the actions violate the Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Community, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and other binding regional and international legal instruments.

    Beyond the Sh129 million compensation for each victim, the applicants are demanding public apologies from the three governments, rehabilitation and psychosocial support, formal condemnation by the EAC Secretary General, institutional reforms to prevent similar abuses, and a special summit of EAC Heads of State to discuss regional peace, justice and governance.

    David Sigano, CEO of the East Africa Law Society, said the violations strike at the core of regional values. “No citizen should be tortured, disappeared, or deported simply for observing a court trial. The East African Court of Justice must rise to the occasion,” he stated.

    Donald Deya, CEO of the Pan African Lawyers Union, described the case as defending the soul of East Africa and its principles of human dignity, regional integration, and rule of law.

    The applicants say the case serves as a warning to regional governments that human rights violations will not go without consequences, with the court’s response measuring the EAC’s commitment to justice and the rule of law.

  • ‘They Inserted Things Into Me Down There,’ Ugandan Activist Agather Atuhaire Recounts Horrifying Ordeal in Tanzanian Custody

    ‘They Inserted Things Into Me Down There,’ Ugandan Activist Agather Atuhaire Recounts Horrifying Ordeal in Tanzanian Custody

    DAR ES SALAAM, Tanzania — Ugandan journalist and activist Agather Atuhaire has detailed a harrowing account of torture and abuse at the hands of Tanzanian authorities following her detention alongside Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi.

    Speaking at a press conference on June 2, 2025, Atuhaire described a brutal ordeal that included physical assault, sexual violation, and being overdosed on painkillers in an apparent attempt to mask the severity of her injuries.

    Atuhaire and Mwangi were detained by Tanzanian state officers while staying at a hotel in Tanzania, an operation she claims was facilitated by hotel staff.

    The two were held incommunicado for several days before being released at border points—Atuhaire at the Mutukula border with Uganda and Mwangi at the Horohoro border with Kenya.

    The arrests, which Atuhaire said came without clear charges, have sparked outrage across East Africa, raising questions about state impunity and the erosion of regional freedoms.

    “They removed all my clothes and left me in my underwear. They beat me. Then I was taken to a clinic, and they inserted stuff into me,” Atuhaire recounted, her voice trembling as she described being forced to lie flat while unknown substances were injected and inserted into her body. “I had no strength left to resist.”

    Atuhaire revealed that the perpetrators did not use their sexual organs, which she described as a small mercy amid the violence.

    However, the physical and emotional scars remain. “I couldn’t walk for three days. The soles of my feet were so swollen, it felt like my skin would burst,” she said, describing the pain that left her incapacitated.

    In what she believes was an attempt to cover up the extent of her injuries, Atuhaire said Tanzanian officers administered excessive doses of painkillers.

    “They kept giving me painkillers. They almost overdosed me,” she explained, noting that a medical note prescribed a dosage of “one times two,” while she was given the drugs up to four times a day.

    “They started to panic that I might not leave in a physically stable condition. They had to make sure I walked out looking like a human being.”

    The detention began with hours of interrogation at an immigration office and a police station, where Atuhaire and Mwangi were bombarded with questions unrelated to their presence in Tanzania.

    “They went through my passport and were angered by the number of visas I had. They accused me of being funded by whites to destabilize the country,” Atuhaire said. One officer even remarked, “I should become an activist too if it gives this kind of life.”

    Atuhaire’s ordeal escalated when she was blindfolded, a moment she described as nearly triggering a panic attack.

    “I had always thought that if I were ever captured, I would carry poison to avoid going through torture. But in that moment, I realized I had to surrender to whatever would happen,” she said.

    The activist pointed to a Tanzanian official, identified as Faustin Mafia, who allegedly handed her and Mwangi over to “thugs” from police custody, highlighting what she called a “chilling level of state-sanctioned impunity.”

    Unlike in Uganda, where abductions are often covert, Atuhaire noted that Tanzanian authorities acted openly, showing no fear of accountability.

    Atuhaire criticized both Tanzanian and Ugandan governments for their complicity and inaction. “My government didn’t even pretend to care. For them, it was good riddance—someone else was getting rid of a headache,” she said.

    She also condemned the broader East African leadership, stating, “We have no institutions. No police that protect citizens. No government. Just ourselves.”

    Despite the trauma, Atuhaire credited ordinary East Africans for her release, saying their protests and public outcry pressured authorities.

    “You saved us. The noise you made made them panic. We were not invisible like the Tanzanians they abduct, torture, and kill quietly,” she said.

    Atuhaire called for justice and accountability, challenging Tanzania’s reputation as a peaceful nation.

    “Tanzania has hidden behind a facade of peace for so long. But the mask is off,” she said.

    “Maybe the pain we went through was so the world could know what ordinary Tanzanians go through. Maybe we had to suffer so that this impunity can be checked—so that no East African has to go through this again.”

    The incident has reignited debates about political freedoms and state violence in the region, with activists and human rights groups demanding investigations into Atuhaire and Mwangi’s treatment.

  • “They Inserted Objects in My Rectum”: Boniface Mwangi Details Brutal Torture in Tanzanian Custody

    “They Inserted Objects in My Rectum”: Boniface Mwangi Details Brutal Torture in Tanzanian Custody

    NAIROBI, Kenya — Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi broke down in tears during a press briefing today as he recounted the horrific torture he endured while detained in Tanzania last month.

    Mwangi, alongside Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire, was subjected to severe physical and sexual abuse during their four-day detention, sparking widespread outrage and calls for justice across East Africa.

    Mwangi described being stripped naked, tied upside down, and beaten on the soles of his feet by four Tanzanian captors.

    “I was screaming so hard, but there were no tears coming out because of how painful it was,” he said, his voice trembling.

    To muffle his cries, his captors stuffed underwear in his mouth and played gospel music in the background.

    The assault escalated when, during an interrogation about his presence in Tanzania, one of the captors applied lubricant to his rectum and inserted objects, leaving Mwangi visibly shattered as he shared the ordeal.

    Atuhaire, a Ugandan lawyer and journalist, also spoke at the briefing, revealing she was stripped naked, beaten, and sexually violated after refusing to undress.

    “The first blow was to my back,” she recalled, adding that the treatment she received in Tanzania was worse than what she had experienced in Uganda, where she often felt targeted for her activism.

    “I expected Tanzania to be better, but it convinced me it’s more dictatorial than Uganda,” she said.

    The activists had traveled to Dar es Salaam on May 19 to attend the treason trial of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who faces charges for advocating electoral reforms ahead of the country’s 2025 elections.

    Their detention began after Mwangi reported a late-night standoff with suspected Tanzanian officers at his hotel, a situation he documented on social media, expressing fears for his safety.

    Both activists were arrested, held incommunicado, and tortured under what Mwangi described as orders from a “state security” official for a “Tanzanian treatment.”

    Mwangi and Atuhaire were deported on May 22 and found abandoned at the borders of their respective countries—Mwangi in Ukunda, Kwale County, and Atuhaire at the Mutukula border between Uganda and Tanzania.

    Boniface and Agather recounting their ordeal in a press address to the international press corps in Nairobi.

    Mwangi was barely able to walk upon his release, requiring urgent medical attention in Nairobi, while Atuhaire bore visible scars from the abuse.

    The incident has drawn sharp criticism from regional and international bodies.

    The U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of African Affairs called for an “immediate and full investigation” into the allegations, noting Atuhaire’s recognition as a 2024 International Women of Courage awardee.

    Amnesty International and other rights groups have echoed the demand, condemning Tanzanian authorities for what they describe as a pattern of suppressing dissent under President Samia Suluhu Hassan’s administration.

    Hassan had previously warned foreign activists against “interfering” in Tanzania, a statement rights groups argue has emboldened state violence.

    Mwangi expressed deep disappointment in the Kenyan government, accusing it of siding with Tanzania and abandoning him despite his history of advocating for others across East Africa, including Ugandan activist Bobi Wine.

    “I’ve traveled to support others, but this time I felt let down,” he said.

    The Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs had issued a statement during the ordeal, protesting Tanzania’s denial of consular access to Mwangi, but critics argue the response was inadequate.

    The detention of Mwangi and Atuhaire was part of a broader crackdown on activists attending Lissu’s trial. Other human rights defenders, including Martha Karua, Gloria Kimani, Lynn Ngugi, Hussein Khalid, Hanifa Adan, and former Chief Justice Willy Mutunga, were deported from Tanzania between May 18 and 19.

    The incident has heightened tensions between Kenya and Tanzania, with activists vowing to seek justice for the abuses endured.

    As Mwangi and Atuhaire recover from their trauma, their accounts have shed light on the escalating repression in Tanzania, raising urgent questions about the state of human rights in the region as the country approaches its 2025 elections.

  • Mudavadi on Why Kenya Remained ‘Silent’ in Tanzanian Detention Row

    Mudavadi on Why Kenya Remained ‘Silent’ in Tanzanian Detention Row

    Kenya’s Prime Cabinet Secretary Musalia Mudavadi has defended the government’s measured response to the detention of activist Boniface Mwangi in Tanzania, explaining why Nairobi chose cooperation over confrontation despite public outcry.

    In a statement released Friday, Mudavadi addressed mounting criticism over Kenya’s seemingly muted reaction to Mwangi’s detention by Tanzanian authorities, which had sparked widespread online outrage and calls for diplomatic intervention.

    Mudavadi revealed that Kenya’s cautious approach was driven by significant economic considerations, with Tanzania serving as a crucial trading partner and host to approximately 250,000 Kenyan citizens.

    “Tanzania ranks sixth among Kenya’s export destinations, accounting for 23 percent of our exports to the East African Community market,” Mudavadi explained, citing 2025 Economic Survey data.

    The country also stands as Kenya’s ninth-largest source of imports and second-largest trading partner in Africa after South Africa.

    The manufacturing sector, which employed 369,200 Kenyans in 2024, heavily depends on regional exports, with Uganda taking the lead at 43 percent of EAC market exports.

    Defending the government’s diplomatic strategy, Mudavadi emphasized that Kenya and Tanzania share “long-standing diplomatic ties, including non-interference in each other’s internal affairs.”

    “The path to resolution lay not in confrontation, but cooperation,” he stated.

    “Our engagement with Tanzania was guided by mutual respect, discretion and the shared understanding that there is a deep bond between our peoples.”

    The Prime Cabinet Secretary argued that while online activism can raise awareness, “it cannot replace the structured dialogue that preserves our bilateral ties and respect for each other’s sovereignty.”

    Balancing individual rights and national interests

    Addressing criticism that the government had abandoned Mwangi, Mudavadi acknowledged Kenyans’ constitutional rights while urging restraint in their exercise.

    “Our constitution guarantees the rights of the individual, but those rights must not overshadow the interests of the millions of other citizens,” he said, emphasizing the government’s obligation to protect the livelihoods of Kenyans working in neighboring countries.

    Mudavadi confirmed that the matter involving Mwangi had been “resolved amicably” through established diplomatic channels, though he provided no details about the resolution process.

    The statement underscored Kenya’s dependence on regional relationships for economic prosperity, with Mudavadi warning against isolation.

    “No nation prospers in isolation. Kenya’s development is anchored in strong economic ties and strategic partnerships with our neighbours,” he said, referencing the recently published 2025 Economic Survey.

    The diplomatic incident highlights the delicate balance Kenya must maintain between protecting its citizens’ rights abroad and preserving crucial economic relationships that underpin domestic employment and trade.

    Mudavadi urged Kenyans to “see the bigger picture” and recognize that the country’s “prosperity, peace and future depend on our ability to build bridges and nurture them in the national interest.”

    The statement comes as Kenya continues to navigate complex regional dynamics while managing domestic expectations for more assertive diplomatic positions on human rights issues.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • “We Were Ordered to Strip for ‘Tanzanian Treatment’” – Boniface Mwangi Recounts Torture Ordeal in Tanzania

    “We Were Ordered to Strip for ‘Tanzanian Treatment’” – Boniface Mwangi Recounts Torture Ordeal in Tanzania

    Boniface Mwangi details brutal treatment alongside Ugandan counterpart Agather Atuhaire during solidarity mission

    Kenyan human rights activist Boniface Mwangi has delivered a shocking account of systematic torture allegedly carried out by Tanzanian security forces during his four-day detention in Dar es Salaam this week.

    Speaking publicly after his release on Thursday, Mwangi described being subjected to what he termed “Tanzanian treatment” alongside Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire, who was found dumped at the Uganda-Tanzania border after their ordeal.

    The two activists had traveled to Tanzania on Monday to show solidarity with opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who faces treason charges, and were planning to attend a court hearing for Ugandan opposition figure Kizza Besigye.

    Mwangi’s testimony paints a disturbing picture of their detention. “We had been tortured, and we were told to strip naked and to go bathe,” he recounted. “We couldn’t walk and were told to crawl and go wash off the blood.”

    The activist described being handcuffed and blindfolded throughout the ordeal, unable to see Atuhaire but hearing “her groaning in pain as they barked orders at us.”

    Any attempt at communication between the detainees was reportedly met with physical violence.

    “Any attempt to speak to each other during the night we were tortured was met with kicks and insults,” Mwangi stated.

    Central to Mwangi’s account is his identification of a specific Tanzanian state security officer whom he holds responsible for orchestrating their treatment.

    He described the individual as “overweight, of average height, light brown skin, with wavy short hair and a sagging potbelly,” wearing a black suit and white shirt during the incident.

    Most significantly, Mwangi claims this officer “reports directly to President Samia Suluhu Hassan,” directly implicating Tanzania’s highest office in the alleged abuse.

    The activist detailed how this security officer followed them from immigration offices to the Central Police Station, where he allegedly ordered their removal to a secret location for what was euphemistically termed “Tanzanian treatment.”

    In a particularly troubling aspect of his account, Mwangi described how the security officer allegedly intimidated three lawyers from the Tanganyika Law Society who had come to assist them.

    “He scared the three lawyers, and they left us at Central Police Station, where we were removed while handcuffed and blindfolded,” Mwangi said, suggesting systematic efforts to deny the activists legal representation.

    Mwangi framed the incident within his broader commitment to pan-African activism, citing previous solidarity visits to imprisoned activists across the continent, including Tanzania’s Freeman Mbowe, Uganda’s Stella Nyanzi, and opposition leader Bobi Wine.

    “I’m a Pan-Africanist, and I have trained and mentored activists in all four corners of our continent,” he explained, quoting Ghana’s Kwame Nkrumah: “I’m not African because I was born in Africa, but because Africa was born in me.”

    In an unusually direct confrontation with Tanzania’s leadership, Mwangi declared: “Everything that happened to us in Tanzania was done in Samia Suluhu’s name, and we will ensure the world gets to know.”

    He vowed that neither he nor other activists would be silenced, stating: “What Suluhu did to us will be revealed to the world. We shall not be silenced by a torturous dictator who has her foot on the necks of the Tanzanian people.”

    Ugandan activist Atuhaire.
    Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire.

    While Atuhaire has been found and released at the border, concerns remain about her condition and the broader implications for activist networks across East Africa.

    The incident has prompted intervention from both Kenyan and Ugandan diplomatic missions.

    Martha Karua, a prominent Kenyan politician, has written to the African Union regarding the detention and alleged torture of both activists, signaling potential regional diplomatic consequences.

    The incident highlights growing tensions around civil society space in East Africa and raises questions about the treatment of regional activists engaged in cross-border solidarity work. Both activists were reportedly in Tanzania for less than 24 hours before their detention.

    Mwangi emphasized that such treatment should not deter continued activism: “Our arrest and detention should not stop the solidarity among African activists or deter us from showing up for each other. Dictators are united, and only our own unity can help democratize our respective countries.”

    The Tanzanian government has not yet responded to the specific allegations made by Mwangi, though the incident is likely to strain regional relations and draw international scrutiny to Tanzania’s human rights record.

  • ‘They Did Unimaginable Things To Me Before Releasing Me,’ Boniface Mwangi Recounts Four Harrowing Days in Tanzanian Custody

    ‘They Did Unimaginable Things To Me Before Releasing Me,’ Boniface Mwangi Recounts Four Harrowing Days in Tanzanian Custody

    Kenyan human rights activist describes brutal torture ordeal as he returns home barely able to walk, calls for prayers for fellow detainee still missing

    Kenyan human rights activist Boniface Mwangi has returned home after four days of what he describes as brutal torture in Tanzanian custody, appearing frail and barely able to walk as he recounted his harrowing ordeal to journalists.

    Speaking from a wheelchair at Moi International Airport in Mombasa on Thursday evening, the visibly shaken activist struggled to find words to describe his experience in detention.

    “I have gone through four dark days. I have been tortured very badly. I can barely walk,” Mwangi said, his voice trembling as medical personnel prepared to airlift him to Nairobi for specialized treatment.

    The activist was arrested in Dar es Salaam earlier this week while attempting to attend a court hearing for Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who faces treason charges. Mwangi was detained alongside Ugandan lawyer and journalist Agather Atuhaire, whose whereabouts remain unknown.

    “I am very concerned about Agather because we were tortured together, and they did very horrible things to us. So, I hope Agather is safe. Please pray for her,” Mwangi pleaded, his concern for his fellow detainee evident despite his own physical condition.

    The ordeal began on Monday when Mwangi posted a video on social media showing a tense late-night confrontation at his hotel room with suspected plainclothes Tanzanian officers. In the footage, he described refusing to open his door to unidentified men who declined to show proper identification.

    “I’m scared of my life because there are a lot of abductions in this country, a lot of executions in this country, and people are in jail for refusing Suluhu’s dictatorship,” Mwangi had said in the video, referencing Tanzanian President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

    Despite his precautions, Mwangi was subsequently arrested and held incommunicado for four days before being deported by road to the Kenyan border. Tanzanian authorities dumped him at Horohoro border post, from where he made his way to Lunga Lunga and eventually to Ukunda in Kwale County.

    Muslim for Human Rights activist Khelef Khalifa, who picked up Mwangi at the border, described the activist’s condition as deeply concerning.

    “He was badly beaten on his legs; he could barely walk. Torture is against the law. Can Tanzania tell us why they detained him? This is a violation of human rights,” Khalifa said.

    Boniface Mwangi being helped by his wife to walk.
    Boniface Mwangi being helped by his wife to walk.

    Videos shared by Haki Africa Executive Director Hussein Khalid showed Mwangi being wheeled through the airport, highlighting the severity of his physical condition. Medical personnel in Diani, where he was first taken for assessment, noted visible injuries and weakness.

    Mwangi’s wife, Njeri, who rushed to be by his side, made an emotional plea to journalists to allow her husband to receive immediate medical attention.

    “No questions… Please, no. He has already said he was tortured. I know this is important and you want a lot of information, but I beg you to please let him go home. He needs medical attention… he has told you himself he was wounded; they tortured him,” she said.

    The activist’s detention sparked widespread condemnation from human rights organizations across East Africa and mounting diplomatic pressure. Prime Cabinet Secretary and Foreign Affairs CS Musalia Mudavadi confirmed Mwangi’s release following public outcry and threats of protests outside the Tanzanian High Commission in Nairobi.

    Hussein Khalid of Haki Africa condemned the Tanzanian government’s treatment of the Kenyan citizen, warning of international intervention if justice is not served.

    “They were brutal and we will not take this thing lightly. If the Kenyan government is complicit we will involve the international community to seek redress,” Khalid stated.

    The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights confirmed receiving Mwangi in Kwale County and coordinating his transfer to Nairobi for comprehensive medical evaluation. The full extent of his injuries remains to be determined by doctors in the capital.

    Despite his ordeal, Mwangi expressed gratitude to Kenyans who advocated for his release.

    “Thank you to everyone who spoke and stood with us; the solidarity was not in vain,” he said before being airlifted to Nairobi.

    The incident has strained diplomatic relations between Kenya and Tanzania, with questions being raised about the treatment of East African citizens across borders. As Mwangi begins his recovery, concerns remain for Agather Atuhaire, whose fate continues to be unknown.

    The activist’s case highlights growing tensions in Tanzania over human rights and political freedoms under President Suluhu’s administration, as opposition voices face increasing pressure and persecution.

  • Tanzanian Intel Claims Activists Funded by West to Cause Chaos, Vows to Crush ‘Imported Disruption’

    Tanzanian Intel Claims Activists Funded by West to Cause Chaos, Vows to Crush ‘Imported Disruption’

    DODOMA, Tanzania – Tanzanian authorities have accused foreign-funded networks of attempting to manipulate the country’s domestic affairs through detained and deported activists, including prominent Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi, according to an official police statement released Thursday.

    The Tanzania Police Force, in collaboration with national security organs, issued a public statement alleging that recent detentions and deportations were linked to what they describe as “foreign-funded networks” seeking to threaten public order and internal security.

    “No nation will allow its domestic affairs to be manipulated by external actors under any guise,” the police statement declared, signaling a hardline stance against what authorities characterize as foreign interference.

    According to preliminary findings outlined in the official statement, Tanzanian intelligence claims the networks are “directly linked to previous incidents in neighboring countries and are financed by institutions such as the Open Society Foundation (OSF).”

    The police specifically alleged that these organizations “operate under civil society banners but with political intentions,” suggesting coordination and support from entities based outside Tanzania.

    President Samia Suluhu Hassan.
    President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

    The statement represents the first official acknowledgment from Tanzanian authorities of the specific allegations surrounding the recent detention of activists, including Mwangi, who was reportedly freed after being held in connection with protests in Nairobi.

    The Tanzanian government has vowed to combat what it terms “imported disruption,” with authorities emphasizing their commitment to monitoring activities that they claim threaten the country’s sovereignty and internal security.

    “Tanzania values civic engagement — but it must not be used as a tool for imported disruption,” the police statement warned, drawing a distinction between legitimate civil society activities and what authorities characterize as foreign-backed interference.

    The statement indicated that further information would be provided “in due course as investigations proceed,” suggesting ongoing security operations related to the alleged networks.

    ## Regional Implications

    The allegations come amid heightened tensions in the East African region, with Tanzanian authorities referencing “previous incidents in neighboring countries” without providing specific details. The mention of cross-border coordination suggests authorities view the issue as having broader regional security implications.

    The case has drawn attention to the activities of international civil society organizations in East Africa, particularly the Open Society Foundation, which was specifically named in the official statement as allegedly funding the networks in question.

    The public statement, released by the Tanzania Police Force spokesperson, emphasized the government’s determination to protect national sovereignty while maintaining that Tanzania continues to value legitimate civic engagement.

    Authorities have advised the public to “remain vigilant” while investigations continue into what they describe as attempts to use civil society networks for political destabilization.

    The development marks a significant escalation in Tanzania’s approach to international civil society organizations and activists, with authorities now publicly alleging direct foreign funding of domestic political activities.

  • Tanzania Denies Kenya Access to Detained Activist Boniface Mwangi

    Tanzania Denies Kenya Access to Detained Activist Boniface Mwangi

    NAIROBI, Kenya, May 21, 2025 — Kenya’s Ministry of Foreign and Diaspora Affairs has formally demanded that Tanzania facilitate consular access to detained activist Boniface Mwangi, citing violations of international law after Kenyan officials were repeatedly denied access to their citizen.

    In an official diplomatic note issued Tuesday, the ministry expressed “deep concern” over Mwangi’s detention and invoked the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, demanding Tanzania comply with international legal obligations “expeditiously and without delay.”

    “Despite several requests, officials of the Government of Kenya have been denied consular access and information to Mr. Mwangi,” the ministry stated in the formal communication to Tanzania’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and East African Cooperation.

    “The Ministry is also concerned about his health, overall wellbeing and the absence of information regarding his detention.”

    Mwangi, a prominent human rights advocate and vocal government critic, was arrested on May 19 in Dar es Salaam while attending the treason trial of Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu.

    While other activists including former Kenyan Chief Justice Willy Mutunga and Ugandan lawyer Agather Atuhaire were subsequently deported, Mwangi remains in Tanzanian custody.

    The diplomatic note specifically references Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (1963), to which both Kenya and Tanzania are signatories.

    The convention guarantees consular officers the right to communicate with and visit nationals who are detained in foreign countries, and to arrange for their legal representation.

    “Consular officers shall have the right to visit a national of the sending State who is in prison, custody or detention, to converse and correspond with him and to arrange for his legal representation,” the ministry quoted from the international treaty.

    Kenya’s escalation to formal diplomatic channels represents a significant hardening of its position following initial attempts at quiet diplomacy.

    The ministry had previously faced mounting public criticism for what many viewed as an inadequate response to Mwangi’s detention.

    Earlier Thursday, Foreign Affairs Principal Secretary Korir Sing’oei had defended the government’s approach, stating on social media that “the Ministry’s obligation to a national who has been apprehended by a foreign country is limited and focused in the first instance on provision of consular assistance.”

    However, the formal diplomatic protest reveals that Kenya has been unable to provide even basic consular services due to Tanzania’s refusal to grant access.

    The detention has sparked widespread criticism, with former Chief Justice David Maraga describing Mwangi’s continued custody “without access to courts, legal counsel, or consular representation” as “a clear violation of international human rights law.”

    Mwangi’s wife, Njeri, has been unable to reach her husband since his arrest at Dar es Salaam’s Serena Hotel. She told AFP she has been informed that Tanzanian authorities are deciding whether to charge or deport him.

    The case highlights growing tensions over Tanzania’s treatment of opposition figures and foreign activists. President Samia Suluhu Hassan declared Monday that “foreign activists would not be allowed to interfere in the country’s affairs,” instructing security agencies to prevent such individuals from “crossing the line.”

    In its diplomatic note, Kenya emphasized its commitment to “cordial bilateral relations” with Tanzania while demanding swift resolution of the matter “in the spirit of regional cooperation and mutual respect.”

    The formal protest concludes with Kenya requesting “assurances of highest consideration” from Tanzania’s foreign ministry, diplomatic language that underscores the seriousness with which Nairobi now views the situation.

    The diplomatic escalation comes as Tanzania faces increasing international scrutiny over its handling of opposition figures ahead of October 2025 elections. Boniface Mwangi has been a prominent voice in Kenyan civil society, frequently leading protests against government corruption and human rights abuses.

  • Boniface Mwangi Detained in Tanzania, Family Can’t Reach Him

    Boniface Mwangi Detained in Tanzania, Family Can’t Reach Him

    Boniface Mwangi, one of Kenya’s most outspoken activists, has been arrested in Tanzania, sparking outrage and concern across East Africa.

    Mwangi was in Dar es Salaam to support Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu during his treason trial. His wife, Njeri Mwangi, says she has not been able to reach him since his detention.

    The Tanzanian government has remained silent about his fate, fueling fears of rising political repression. With tensions growing in the region, Mwangi’s arrest is now at the center of a larger conversation about democracy and freedom in East Africa.

    Lawyer Jebra Kambole confirmed that Boniface Mwangi (pictured) spent the night at the Central Police Station in Dar es Salaam. However, no official charges have been made public, and no communication has been allowed between Mwangi and his family. [Photo: Courtesy]

    Boniface Mwangi Arrested in Tanzania While Supporting Opposition Leader

    Boniface Mwangi, known for his fearless activism against corruption and police brutality in Kenya, was arrested on Monday, May 19, in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. He had traveled there to show solidarity with Tanzanian opposition leader Tundu Lissu, who is facing treason charges. Mwangi was among several East African activists who attended the hearing.

    His wife, Njeri Mwangi, told AFP that Boniface was taken from the Serena Hotel by Tanzanian authorities alongside Ugandan activist Agather Atuhaire. Since then, she has not been able to contact him. “I have been told they are waiting for the government of Tanzania to consult and decide whether to charge him or to deport him,” she said.

    Lawyer Jebra Kambole confirmed that Mwangi spent the night at the Central Police Station in Dar es Salaam. However, no official charges have been made public, and no communication has been allowed between Mwangi and his family.

    President Samia Suluhu Hassan stated on Monday that foreign activists would not be permitted to interfere in Tanzanian affairs. She directed security agencies to prevent “ill-mannered individuals from other countries” from crossing any lines in Tanzania.

    The arrest has sparked concern among human rights organizations and civil society groups, who fear it marks another sign of shrinking democratic space in the region.

    Tanzania Clamps Down on Regional Solidarity

    Tundu Lissu’s Chadema party has been banned from participating in Tanzania’s upcoming October elections. The party had called for electoral reforms before the vote. As a result, the court case against Lissu has drawn wide attention from across the region.

    Several foreign activists who attempted to attend Lissu’s hearing were denied entry. Kenyan politician and former presidential candidate Martha Karua was among them. She was deported shortly after landing in Tanzania.

    Despite the crackdown, Karua later traveled to Uganda to represent opposition leader Kizza Besigye, who also faces treason charges. She shared online that she was able to enter Uganda without incident.

    The Tanzanian government’s actions are seen by many as part of a broader effort to silence political opposition and discourage international scrutiny. Critics say that by arresting and deporting foreign allies, Tanzania is isolating activists and shielding its judiciary from external pressure.

    Fears Grow Over Regional Authoritarian Shift

    Boniface Mwangi’s arrest is not an isolated incident. Across East Africa, political repression appears to be on the rise. Uganda has detained key opposition figures, including Kizza Besigye, whose case bears similarities to that of Lissu in Tanzania.

    Activists worry that East African leaders are using legal systems and national security claims to stifle dissent. The move to arrest Mwangi and others shows a trend of labeling peaceful observers as threats to national stability.

    Mwangi’s detention also raises questions about the safety of activists who travel across borders to support democratic movements. While international solidarity has always played a role in pushing for reforms, governments like Tanzania’s are now treating it as unwanted foreign interference.

    Mwangi’s case has captured public attention in Kenya, where many view him as a symbol of resistance and integrity. Local groups are now calling on the Kenyan government to demand his immediate release and ensure his safety.

    As the region approaches key elections and court decisions, the fate of activists like Boniface Mwangi may define how far East African governments are willing to go to control their political narratives.

     

  • “We Train Police To Kill People, Not Animals”: Senior Magistrate’s Warning to Activist Boniface Mwangi Sparks Outrage

    “We Train Police To Kill People, Not Animals”: Senior Magistrate’s Warning to Activist Boniface Mwangi Sparks Outrage

    A video capturing Kibra Senior Principal Magistrate Samson Temu’s controversial warning to prominent Kenyan activist Boniface Mwangi has gone viral, igniting a fierce debate about police brutality and judicial conduct in Kenya.

    In the footage shared by Sema Ukweli, an organization documenting human rights injustices including extrajudicial killings, Magistrate Temu is heard telling Mwangi: “Why do you want these guys (police) to kill you? You know we train them to kill people, not animals. By the time you convince them you’re not a bird, you’re dead… Think about your family. Forget about Kenya. Kenya will take care of itself.”

    The exchange reportedly occurred when Mwangi appeared in court following what he describes as a “forceful arrest” from his Sema Ukweli office.

    According to Mwangi, police claimed they were responding to a noise complaint, but he alleges he was “beaten so badly that I ended up in hospital” before facing “fake charges.”

    In response to the viral video, Mwangi defended the magistrate’s comments, stating: “We laughed because what Magistrate Temu said is true. He meant well. He spoke to me man-to-man, because he knows Kenya police are trained to kill us.” Mwangi added that Temu “sympathised with me. I was before him on false charges, and he asked Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA)  to investigate and I didn’t take plea.”

    Screenshot

    However, Dr. Willy Mutunga, the former Chief Justice, sharply criticized the magistrate’s remarks: “This is not a laughing matter. These comments reflect on the abuse of judicial power. On what constitutional or legal grounds is this ‘advice’ given?”

    The controversy highlights alarming statistics shared by Sema Ukweli, which documented 159 cases of extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances in Kenya in 2024 alone.

    Of these, 104 cases (65%) were attributed to police-related killings, while 55 cases (35%) were classified as enforced disappearances.

    The incident has intensified calls from civil society groups using hashtags like #EndPoliceBrutalityKe and #EndAbductionsKe to demand accountability and reform within Kenya’s law enforcement and judicial systems.

    As the video continues to circulate online, it has sparked a broader conversation about the relationship between the judiciary, law enforcement, and activists fighting for human rights in Kenya.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

    WATCH the video below:

    895eb2c3-eb8f-42d2-96f1-fe297288ce08

  • Activist Boniface Mwangi Alleges Police Brutality, Faces Assault Charges

    Activist Boniface Mwangi Alleges Police Brutality, Faces Assault Charges

    Renowned activist Boniface Mwangi has found himself at the center of a controversial case involving allegations of police brutality and what he describes as a miscarriage of justice.

    According to detailed accounts shared by Mwangi on social media, what began as a routine noise complaint response has escalated into a situation where the activist now faces criminal charges despite claiming to be the victim.

    Mwangi recounts that on April 2, 2025, around 9:30 pm, three police officers—Inspector Stanley Yano, Sergeant Osman Omar, and Constable Robert Ouko—arrived at his Sema Ukweli office citing a noise complaint.

    The situation allegedly deteriorated when Constable Ouko, whom Mwangi describes as “drunk and chewing miraa,” began physically confronting individuals present.

    “A scuffle ensued when I questioned why an intoxicated officer was on duty with a firearm,” Mwangi stated.

    He claims that during the altercation, Constable Ouko attempted to discharge his weapon but was prevented by one of Mwangi’s colleagues.

    The activist alleges he was subsequently handcuffed, dragged from his office, and assaulted in front of witnesses.

    According to Mwangi, the handcuffs caused injuries to his wrists before coming off during the struggle—handcuffs he claims his team recovered and still possesses as evidence.

    Mwangi states that after being detained at Kilimani Police Station, he received additional beatings from Constable Ouko inside the holding cell.

    He was later taken to Nairobi Hospital under police escort in the early hours of April 3rd after the station’s Officer Commanding Station (OCS), Albert Chebii, observed his condition.

    Medical examinations reportedly revealed no fractures but documented injuries to his wrists, knee, lip, ribs, and left eye.

    After treatment, Mwangi says he filed a formal assault report (OB No. 84/02/04/25) and was released on a Ksh 5,000 police bond. He also alleges his watch and AirPods were taken during the arrest and have not been returned.

    Charges Against the Activist

    In what Mwangi describes as a troubling turn of events, police filed charges of “offensive conduct and assault” against him at Kibera Law Court on April 7th while he was abroad on work-related travel to Brazil and Ghana.

    “I was assaulted by the police, physically injured, had my watch and AirPods stolen by them, and I’m the one being charged with a crime?” Mwangi wrote in his statement.

    Despite his attorney presenting evidence of his international travel commitments, the court reportedly issued an arrest warrant and rescheduled his plea hearing for April 22, 2025.

    Prior to departing Kenya, Mwangi filed a complaint with the Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA), stating he did so because “you can never fully trust our police.”

    The case raises significant questions about police conduct, accountability, and the treatment of activists in Kenya. Mwangi, who has long been a vocal critic of police brutality and corruption, concluded his statement with a sobering observation: “I got my first black eye at the age of 41 at the hands of a drunk officer.”

    Police authorities have not yet issued a public response to Mwangi’s allegations. The case continues to develop as the activist prepares for his scheduled court appearance tomorrow.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Activist Boniface Mwangi Abducted, Wife Says

    Activist Boniface Mwangi Abducted, Wife Says

    Activist Boniface Mwangi was Sunday picked up by unknown persons from his Machakos home.

    His wife Njeri Mwangi confirmed the incident.

    The latest development came barely 24 hours after Mwangi revealed plans to infiltrate and occupy the Standard Chartered Marathon, taking place on Sunday, October 27.

    Security was enhanced at the event with major roads blocked for those participating.

    Police revealed they were ready to address any form of threat from the planned protests and others.

    Police in both uniforms and civilians were deployed to the event.

    “We know him and his followers. They are courageous and can cause much damage to the event hence the move to deploy more,” said an officer aware of the issue.

    In his post on Saturday evening, the activist urged his followers to show up for the marathon with attire opposing the Kenya Kwanza regime.

    According to Njeri, the outspoken activist was picked up by unknown people on Sunday morning at around 7: 15 am.

    “This morning at around 7.15, six uninformed people went to courage base and forcefully took my husband from the house. I have no idea who, why or where they have taken him,” Boniface Mwangi’s wife shared on social media.

    Among other instructions, the activist urged his followers to adorn the national flag as part of their sports gear, wear hats with the national colours, record protest chants and share them online and bring placards with messages to President William Ruto.

    “Will you show up to cheer friends at the Standard Chartered marathon? You are a crucial part of the race, your cheering will motivate and energise the athletes and help reform our country in the process.”

    “This is how; adorn the national flag as part of your sports gear, wear hats with the national colours, wear a bandana with the message RutoMustGo, record protest chants and share online and bring a placard with your message to Ruto,” he said.

    He told those who will participate in the event to post protest messages online and adopt the Kasongo song as their marathon chant and record any incidents of police brutality towards spectators and share them online.

    “Stay calm and peaceful and have fun!” He said.

  • M-Changa Controversies: Government Bloggers Accuse Platform of Funding Anarchy

    M-Changa Controversies: Government Bloggers Accuse Platform of Funding Anarchy

    In the wake of the recent Generation Z protests in Kenya, government bloggers have expressed outrage over the use of M-Changa, an online and mobile fundraising platform, to raise funds for hospital and funeral expenses of casualties, especially those shot by police.

    The protests, driven by calls for change and justice, have seen significant support, but the involvement of M-Changa has sparked a heated debate on its appropriateness and legality.

    M-Changa Controversies

    The Role of M-Changa vs Controversies

    M-Changa offers a platform for individuals, organizations, and businesses to raise funds and create awareness for their causes.

    With over 102,164 users and 1,508,020 supporters, it has become a trusted tool for fundraising.

    The platform ensures the safety of funds through secure accounts, verified fundraisers, multiple treasurers’ approval, and transparent fundraising activities.

    Criticism from Government Supporters

    Lord Abraham Mutai, a staunch supporter of President William Ruto, has vehemently criticized the use of M-Changa for supporting the Gen Z protests.

    On his social media platform, Mutai accused the proponents of these protests of using M-Changa to destabilize the government. He posted:

    “SHOULD be held ACCOUNTABLE immediately. M-Changa’s policy strictly forbids fundraising for political activities or insurrection. Yet, M-Changa is hosting several fundraisers by people like Boni, Hanifa, and others, directly calling for the removal of a legitimate sitting government under the #RutoMustGo hashtag. If fundraising to remove a legitimately elected government isn’t political and insurrection, then what does M-Changa mean by ‘no fundraising for political reasons’?”

    Allegations of Misuse of Funds

    Mutai has particularly targeted activist Hanifa, accusing her of misusing the funds collected from Gen Z supporters.

    According to Mutai, Hanifa did not allocate all the money to cover hospital bills but used some to finance her lifestyle, including purchasing a posh car.

    He also alleged that funds were used to fund chaos and buy coffins scattered around Nairobi’s CBD by leaders of the Gen Z protests, like activist Boniface Mwangi (Boni), which contradicts M-Changa’s terms and conditions.

    M-Changa’s Policies

    M-Changa strictly prohibits fundraising for illegal activities, harm, or misleading contributors.

    Fundraisers must follow all applicable laws and regulations, avoiding impersonation, copyright, or patent infringement.

    Additionally, M-Changa bans fundraising for political purposes directly related to election events. Despite these policies, Mutai’s accusations have cast a shadow over the platform’s integrity.

    M-Changa Controversies

    Government Response

    Mutai has called for the government to urgently investigate and hold M-Changa accountable for allowing these fundraisers.

    He insisted that the government should summon M-Changa’s bosses to explain how the platform is being used to fund what he describes as anarchy.

    He claimed that the Ksh30 million raised did not entirely come from Kenyans and hinted at foreign contributors fueling the unrest.

    M-Changa Controversies, Transparency and Trust

    M-Changa emphasizes the transparency and safety of its platform. Funds are held in secure accounts until withdrawal, which requires approval from nominated treasurers.

    All fundraising activities, including the amount raised and the number of contributors, are publicly available online. The platform’s customer care team is available to address any public concerns.

    Supporters of the Gen Z protests argue that M-Changa has provided a vital service in raising necessary funds for those affected by police violence.

    They believe the platform has been transparent and has used the funds appropriately for medical expenses and funeral costs.

    Wrapping Up

    The controversy surrounding the use of M-Changa for fundraising in support of the Gen Z protests highlights the complex interplay between technology, politics, and social justice movements.

    While government bloggers like Abraham Mutai demand accountability and transparency, supporters of the protests argue that the platform has been essential in providing support to those in need.

    As the debate continues, the role of platforms like M-Changa in political and social movements will remain under scrutiny.

    For now, M-Changa’s commitment to secure, transparent, and ethical fundraising remains critical as it navigates the challenges posed by its involvement in such contentious issues.

  • Boniface Mwangi Hints at DP Rigathi Gachagua Alleged Involvement in Violent Parliament Invasion

    Boniface Mwangi Hints at DP Rigathi Gachagua Alleged Involvement in Violent Parliament Invasion

    Boniface Mwangi, a renowned activist and photojournalist, has hinted that Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua is under state investigation for allegedly financing the violent invasion of Kenya’s Parliament on June 25, 2024.

    The invasion occurred during Gen Z-led protests against the controversial Finance Bill 2024/25, which President William Ruto later withdrew.

    DP Rigathi Gachagua

    Did DP Rigathi Gachagua Play a Role in the Parliament Invasion?

    Mwangi Kiunjuri, Laikipia East MP, revealed in an NTV interview that four politicians from the Mt. Kenya region organized 20,000 protesters, with 3,000 coming from Juja.

    He claimed government funds supported this protest, and authorities were aware of the involved office.

    Kiunjuri’s statements have intensified the political turmoil, challenging the government to address these allegations and restore public order.

    Protests and Government Response

    Protesters clashed with police during the demonstrations, escalating into the storming and partial burning of the Parliament building.

    President Ruto deployed military forces to assist the National Police Service in managing the unrest.

    A government gazette stated, “Pursuant to Article 241 (3) (b) of the Constitution of Kenya… the Kenya Defence Forces is deployed on the 25th June, 2024, in support of the National Police Service in response to the security emergency caused by the ongoing violent protests.”

    Boniface Mwangi’s Allegations

    Boniface Mwangi’s allegations have further fueled the fire. Reports suggest the state is now pursuing those suspected of orchestrating the invasion.

    Several protesters were fatally shot, and many were admitted to Kenyatta National Hospital with bullet wounds, raising the stakes in the political crisis.

    President Ruto’s Address and Withdrawal of the Finance Bill

    President Ruto, in his address to the nation on the night of the incident, condemned the violence, blaming criminals disguised as Gen Z protesters.

    He announced the withdrawal of the Finance Bill the following day to quell the unrest.

    However, DP Gachagua blamed Noordin Haji, Director General of the National Intelligence Service (NIS), for failing to provide timely information about the protests’ magnitude.

    Political Accusations and Responses

    “We have a dysfunctional National Intelligence Service that has exposed the President, the government, and the people of Kenya,” Gachagua stated.

    Amid rampant rumors, government bloggers suggested Gachagua financed the violent protests.

    The government also accused former President Uhuru Kenyatta of sponsoring the chaos, complicating the political landscape further.

    Impact on President Ruto’s Administration

    The ongoing protests have put President Ruto in a difficult position as he struggles to restore order and address demonstrators’ grievances.

    To strengthen his political base, Ruto expanded his cabinet to include vocal politicians allied with Opposition Chief Raila Odinga.

    Kiunjuri’s Statements and Political Polarization

    Kiunjuri’s assertion that youths from Juja were paid to storm Parliament adds complexity to the situation.

    As a key ally of President Ruto, Kiunjuri’s statements have further polarized the political environment.

    The government’s response to these allegations and its ability to manage the ongoing unrest will be critical in determining the stability of Ruto’s administration.

    Controversial Finance Bill and Public Outcry

    The Finance Bill 2024/25, seen as highly punitive by many Kenyans, particularly the youth, proposed tax increases and austerity measures perceived as disproportionately affecting the lower and middle classes.

    The government withdrew the bill in direct response to the public outcry and the violent events that unfolded, but the damage to its credibility was already done.

    Future Implications for DP Rigathi Gachagua

    As the nation grapples with the aftermath of the Parliament invasion and the broader political implications, the spotlight remains on Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua.

    If proven true, the accusations against him could have far-reaching consequences for his political career and the stability of the current administration.

    The government’s investigation into the funding and organization of the protests will be crucial in uncovering the truth and holding those responsible accountable.

    Call for Transparency and Reform

    Boniface Mwangi’s challenge to Mwangi Kiunjuri and the subsequent public discourse highlight deep-seated issues within Kenya’s political landscape.

    Corruption, misuse of government funds, and political manipulation remain significant concerns. The events of June 25, 2024, have brought these issues to the forefront.

    As Kenya navigates this tumultuous period, the need for transparency, accountability, and genuine political reform has never been more apparent.

    The coming weeks and months will be critical in determining the direction of the country’s political future and the ability of its leaders to address the root causes of the unrest.

    Former Kiambu Governor William Kabogo also responded to Kiunjuri’s post, challenging him to name the obvious person as he sympathized with “RugyG,” cleverly hinting at Rigathi Gachagua, the Deputy President.

  • Police Detain Protesters In March To Honour Fallen Comrades

    Police Detain Protesters In March To Honour Fallen Comrades

    Kenyan police detained several people on Thursday who attempted to present a petition to the president’s office and lay flowers to honour those killed a month ago on the most violent day of anti-government protests.

    Among those detained were Boniface Mwangi, a prominent activist involved in the protests.

    Videos posted on social media by activists showed the marchers just before they were detained, carrying white crosses stained with red and chanting: “We are peaceful!”

    They had been trying to present a petition to demand justice for those who were killed in the protests.

    More than 50 people have been killed since mid-June, when protesters began taking to the streets to oppose tax increases proposed by President William Ruto, according to the government-funded Kenya National Commission on Human Rights (KNCHR).

    KNCHR has also said that nearly 700 people have been arbitrarily detained and 59 have been abducted or are missing in connection with the protests.

    “We will not allow that their death be in vain,” Wanjira Wanjiru, an activist from the capital’s Mathare neighbourhood, said before leaving for central Nairobi to join the march.

    “We will not allow our country to ever go back to the realities that you cannot go out to protest for fear that a bullet may take your life.”

    Ruto withdrew the tax legislation the day after the violence at parliament and sacked most of his cabinet, but demonstrations against his government and systemic corruption have continued.

    Many protesters are calling for Ruto to resign, and are angered by his nominations to a new cabinet. Most are holdovers from the previous government and some are members of the main opposition party, which the protesters have also condemned as corrupt.

    Ruto says the new cabinet reflects national unity and will address the demands of the protest movement. He has promised to investigate alleged abuses by the police during demonstrations but has broadly defended their conduct.

    On Thursday, he nominated Douglas Kanja to lead the national police service. Kanja had been acting in that role since July 12 when his predecessor resigned following condemnation of officers’ response to the protests.

    Kanja is a career police officer with nearly four decades of experience and served as the deputy inspector general of the force.

    Since the protests began in Kenya, small anti-corruption demonstrations have taken place in neighbouring Uganda and activists in Nigeria have called for protests next month against graft and the high cost of living.
  • Kenyans Gang Up Against Sakaja As He Sues Activist For Sh100M Over Alleged Defamation

    Kenyans Gang Up Against Sakaja As He Sues Activist For Sh100M Over Alleged Defamation

    A section of Kenyans have turned their backs on Nairobi governor Johnson Sakaja and accused him of being intolerant towards fair criticism after suing Human Rights activist Jerotich Seii for alleged defamation.

    Coming hot on their heels, the Nairobi boss is being criticized for not having a hard shell to deal with criticism from his voters.

    The governor has moved to court seeking Sh100 million in damages from the activist and Standard Media Group for defamatory remarks she allegedly made during an interview with Spice FM.

    The suit doesn’t come as a surprise as Seii has in the recent past put up a sustained campaign against the governor especially on social media stemming from illegal structures suffocating the city.

    The Suit

    In the court document, Sakaja asserts that on January 26, Jerotich Seii appeared as a guest on the program, where she insinuated collusion between him and real estate developers to erect high-rise buildings exceeding legal height limits.

    “On the 26th day of January 2024, the 2nd Defendant/Respondent herein, in a morning show programme dubbed ‘The Situation Room’ that was aired by one of its radio stations by the name Spice FM, hosted the 1st Defendant as the guest speaker where alongside the programme hosts namely Mr. Eric Latiff, Ms. Ndu Okoh and Mr. Charles T Muga, went on a discourse of discussing the guest’s views about the recent unveiled Chinese Property Developers Association,” the statement read in part.

    According to Sakaja, the program hosts failed to moderate the guest’s remarks, which he claims have tarnished his reputation and undermined his status as a reputable citizen, as enshrined in Chapter Six of the Constitution.

    The lawsuit specifically highlights statements attributed to Jerotich, implying that the Governor and developers knowingly violated the law.

    “The community are organised, they do public participation informing the developers that you are not going to construct here and send them away somehow, these guys end up getting permission/permits that they require and finally after launching the association and going to visit the Governor Sakaja in his office, the following day all permits were issued and they are excavating as we speak,”Jerotich had purportedly stated.

    Through his lawyers Okatch & Partners, the governor accuses the activist of defaming him by linking him to a Chinese cartel behind the controversial buildings in the capital.

    “She alluded to the fact that the Governor had “gotten to bed” with the Chinese Property Developers and thus neglected the voters who have elected him into his office, to add salt to the injury she vehemently stated that the Governor Johnson Sakaja had left the groups whatsapp in order to avoid accountability and she vehemently stated that:”….Governor Sakaja, left all the Kilimani Foundation whatsapp groups quietly in the dead if the night on the 27th day of December, shortly after that, the Chinese are in his office thereafter, he is launching the Chinese property Developers Association, Immediately after permissions are issued to this company called Alina on Likoni Lane and the MD of Alina is the vice chair of the Chinese property Developers Association. If this is not cartel what is?” Part of the document reads.

    Moreover, the remarks have been framed as an attack on his qualifications to hold office as stipulated by Chapter Six of the Constitution of Kenya, 2010.

    The governor seeks not only a financial settlement but also an unqualified apology from the defendants, along with a permanent injunction to prevent further defamatory publications.

    [pdf-embedder url=”https://cms.kenyainsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/HCCCE0322024-HON-SAKAJA-V-STANDARD-GROUP-PLC-JEROTICH-SEII.pdf” title=”HCCCE0322024-HON SAKAJA V STANDARD GROUP PLC & JEROTICH SEII”]

    Reactions from Kenyans 

    Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna called out the governor over his decision, “This is a cowardly attempt to silence critics. We need involved citizens like you to keep the elected honest. The beauty is that Nairobi has 5 million of us. Sakaja cannot sue us all.” He write on X.

    Taking to X to express their disgust with the suit, a number have marked it as a SLAPP aimed at silencing Seii and potential ‘defamers’. “This looks suspiciously like a SLAPP suit. Unfortunately these are becoming all too common,” John Allan Namu, renowned investigative journalist pointed out.

    “The primary goal of a SLAPP is not to win the case, but rather to use the legal process itself to inflict financial and emotional strain on the defendant. Defamation suits are a common SLAPP tactic,” Lawyer Stephen Mallowah explained.

    He continued, “high damage awards in defamation suits can create a chilling effect, making individuals or groups hesitant to speak out on matters of public interest for fear of expensive and lengthy court battles. on matters of public interest for fear of expensive and lengthy court battles. The plaintiff is often a wealthy individual, corporation, or government entity with greater resources than the defendant. The allegedly defamatory statements address issues of public concern, such as criticizing business practices or government actions.“

    Some senior lawyers also dismissed the suit as a joke, former Law Society of Kenya (LSK) President Nelson Havi belittled it sarcastically terming it ‘Obtaining fees through false presences’.

    Another lawyer Mr Ndong termed it as a suit in futility, accusing the lawyer who drafted if for misleading the governor, “Sometimes I do think some of my Learned Friends mislead Clients in Defamation suits. Definitely won’t succeed.”

    Renowned activists also joined to stand in solidarity with Seii and in calling out Sakaja for his move, “You fight out of pain or passion. What’s important is that when Jerotich wins, the public wins. She is fighting for all Nairobi residents.” Boniface Mwangi said.

    “We cannot allow criminals and dishonest politicians like Sakaja who are drunk with power to use the courts to intimidate citizens for exercising their rights!” Said Wanjeri Nderu, “Human Rights Defenders and Active citizens have a right to demand for services and accountability from elected officials. Defamation lawsuits are a tactic used by those afraid of exposure to silence critics we must speak up. This is madness!” She added.

    Seii has relentlessly criticized the county government and the governor himself for overseeing rising constructions of alleged dangerous buildings in the capital mostly done by the Chinese contractors that she alleges have pocketed the governor.

  • Governor Mutua Gets Gag Orders Against Boniface Mwangi

    Governor Mutua Gets Gag Orders Against Boniface Mwangi

    Machakos governor Alfred Mutua has been granted a major reprieve after the high court stopped activist Boniface Mwangi from further defaming him.

    High Court judge Margaret Muigai issued the orders in an application filed by the governor.

    “An interim injunction is hereby granted restraining Mr Mwangi or his agents, from publishing in any print or electronic media, on any electronic or web-hosted platform, such defamatory material, concerning Governor Mutua,”Justice Muigai ordered.

    The judge also certified Governor Mutua’s application as urgent and directed him to serve Mr Mwangi who is expected to respond within two weeks.

    This after Governor Mutua through lawyer Harrison Kinyanjui moved to court seeking to bar activist Boniface Mwangi from defaming him further.

    The Governor urged the court to issue interim injunction restraining the activist from publishing in any print, electronic media, on any electronic or any web-hosted platform, repeating any publication, innuendos, insinuation, allegations or statement linking him to distraction of his Lukenya house.

    The case will be mentioned on November 4.