Category: Business

  • Battle Royale: Blogger Cyprian Nyakundi Takes His War To Safaricom’s Collymore Doorstep With A Damaging Petition To Vodafone

    Battle Royale: Blogger Cyprian Nyakundi Takes His War To Safaricom’s Collymore Doorstep With A Damaging Petition To Vodafone

    Blogger Nyakundi and Safaricom CEO Bob Collymore have been on an extended corporate battling for the longest time with the writer facing uncountable  law suits pressed against him by the company following his sustained criticism and scrutiny on the region’s biggest teleco.

    Gassed with the legal suits which he reads as intimidation on him to keep an eye off the company , Nyakundi has taken the war a top notch higher by writing a petition to the Safaricom’s mother company , Vodafone with the hopes they’ll intervene in the endless tussles. Kenya Insights has obtained contents of the letter that is going to put Safaricom and the CEO on a hard surface.

    Read the letter below :

     

    My name is Cyprian Nyakundi, a Kenyan based blogger who has a fundamental interest in corporate fraud investigations, politics and human interest stories. In my line of writing, I’ve poked holes into the Safaricom Limited’s management, a cause that has landed me behind bars several times and making me a marked man by your affiliate company, Safaricom.

    The cases since their genesis haven’t bore any fruits as they keep flopping given the justice standards in Kenya and also that they don’t hold much water but rather turned out to be Scare Tactics that Safaricom CEO Bob Collymore loves using aimed at keeping the company out of scrutiny.

    Consider this, Bob Collymore Safaricom CEO, colluded with Kenyan CID Officers, to have me illegally-arrested and detained for more than three days only for the office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) to drop charges due to the faultiness of the charge-sheet. That is who Bob Collymore is, because he is has purse-strings of Safaricom under his control, he can influence the course of justice officers and seek to intimidate citizens of the country.

    From my research, Vodafone believes in accountability and openness in management. Given its shareholding dynamics, Safaricom is a public company with Vodafone and The Kenyan Government holding largest stakes. In this regard, the company should not shy away from sharp public eye given the national interest threshold it meets.

    I have been dragged into courts countless times and currently have gag orders from the same company against speaking on any item online pertaining to its operations. This does not only infringe on my freedom of expression as guaranteed by the Constitution of Kenya, but also a blinding tactic to the public since I have been a vocal voice in the Kenyan online community.

    I feel like this is more than seeking justice from Safaricom’s end, but rather a witchhunt targeting my personality and reputation. In all publications that dailies run against me as regards to Safaricom, I’m constantly painted as a malicious character, which is far from the truth. I’m tempted to think the scribes are compromised to tarnish my repuation.

    I feel Safaricom has a personal vendetta against me, as the Kenyan Internet ecosystem has hundreds of blogs plus scores of dailies that have dared to write about Safaricom including; Nairobi Law Monthly an authoritative publication in the Kenya’s legal fraternity who ran a three month-long series exposing the same items as my blog. Does this imply that Vodafone as the controller of Safaricom has an overall policy to gag and bully those questioning basic operational decisions?

    On KPMG audit report that I have been issued gag orders against, Bob Collymore, the company CEO demonised the mere fact that I ran serialisation on the same, yet the internal audit-process as I’m made to understand, was commissioned by Vodafone itself. In fact Safaricom’s legal team copied my KPMG Tweets and included them in their contempt of court application, yet Nation Media Group which ran a similar storyline, didn’t incurs Bob Collymore’s wrath.

    Events following the release of the KPMG report including recalling of the CFO who was primarily mentioned as an architect of graft practices in the company, is proof that my publications didn’t have malicious intent.

    In yet another incident, Safaricom sued me for revealing that customers (of which I am one of them), were losing money to the third party-scammers, because of Safaricom’s negligence and unwillingness to educate their clients on how to deal with Third Party subscriptions. Recently, after an article that appeared on my Blog went viral, Safaricom was forced to refund billions of shillings to their customers after a third party called ”Cheza Games” was discovered to be stealing from customers through the backend in collaboration with some Safaricom Staff.

    The Question is, if the ”Cheza Games” third party scammaers could steal billions from Kenyans, what about other Third Parties? How much monies are Kenyans losing to third parties that work hand in hand with Safaricom Staff, which are allowed to thrive due to managerial-hubris?

    I think the incorporation of Safaricom and it’s very existence is subject to multiple oversight mechanism, due to the multi-sectoral nature and the growth of the mobile telephony market. Safaricom is governed by banking, communication, labour, environmental and other laws and regulatory-frameworks, meaning that it cannot escape scrutiny in totality.

    I would like Vodafone as parent company to compel Safaricom to respect and uphold laws that have equally made it possible to grow and thrive. Coming from an era of Government controls on telecommunication, Safaricom is enjoying the same space that many fought for, to liberalise sectors to enhance the growth of industry, reason perhaps why Safaricom is one of your best performing affiliates in the continent. I also believe that blogs drive traffic and increase revenue to Safaricom, Kenya’s leading mobile Internet service provider. I shouldn’t necessarily be viewed as an enemy.

    It’s worth noting that ever since Safaricom initiated legal proceedings against myself, none of the cases have been completed, a clear indication that they are perhaps side-shows and diversionary-tactics meant to buy time and extend the gagging periods.

    Kenya recently passed a law that makes it open for public to access information from any public institution, and it would be a great gesture if Safaricom leads the way, as a good corporate citizen, to be part of the on-going discourse as regards to transparency and accountability.

    The matters I raise on my blog are of immense public interest and historical reference.

    I hereby attach some of the documents which have been commissioned by yourselves, and which were anonymously sent to me, by insiders who have felt compelled to stand on the right side of history, and blow the lid on specific actions which may undermine Vodafone’s overall bottom-line.

    Regards
    Cyprian Nyankundi
    Editor Cnyakundi.como

  • Fidelity Bank With Sh.217B Assets Base Acquired By SBM Holding Group of Mauritius

    Fidelity Bank With Sh.217B Assets Base Acquired By SBM Holding Group of Mauritius

    The Central Bank of Kenya (CBK) has been advised by both SBM Holdings Limited (SBM Group) of Mauritius and Fidelity Commercial Bank Limited (FCBL) of SBM Group’s intention to acquire FCBL. The proposed acquisition, which is subject to regulatory approvals in Kenya and Mauritius, will mark the entry of SBM Group into Kenya’s banking sector.

    Fidelity Commercial Bank Ltd. (FCBL) commenced operations as a non-bank financial institution in June 1992, and converted into a commercial bank in April 1996. It was ranked 31 of 41 banks in terms of market share as at December 31, 2015, with a share of 0.39 percent and fourteen branches around the country. SBM Group is the second largest company listed on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius.

    As at September 30, 2016, it had an asset base of about Ksh.417 billion (US$4.2 billion). SBM Group’s banking arm, SBM Bank (Mauritius) Ltd., is a leading bank in Mauritius with an international footprint in India, Madagascar, and a representative office in Myanmar. SBM Group will bring its experience and expertise from Mauritius and other markets, to enhance competitiveness and the resilience of Kenya’s banking sector. SBM Group is pursuing an international expansion strategy, and for the African region, it is anchored on Kenya as the entry point for Eastern Africa.

    The transaction is expected to be completed by December 31, 2016, and further updates will be provided as the transaction progresses. Analysts say rising bad debts, the capping of commercial lending rates and weaknesses in corporate governance exposed by the collapse of two lenders in the past year and a half, have made the Kenyan banking sector ripe for consolidation.

    Fidelity Bank was also a victim of now common panic messages on social media. Earlier in the year, the bank was hit with rumours that the bank would be put under statutory management and this may have caused anxiety for stakeholders and customers. Then Central Bank’s assurance that the bank is not going under statutory management gave them reprieve. This new arrangement however stamps that the bank had stability issues .

  • Andrew Sunkuli and Samson Omwanza Ombati Advocate Conned Equity Bank CEO, Moi Says In Muthaiga Land Row

    Andrew Sunkuli and Samson Omwanza Ombati Advocate Conned Equity Bank CEO, Moi Says In Muthaiga Land Row

    Former President Daniel Toroitich arap Moi on Thursday told the court that Equity Bank chief executive James Mwangi was conned out of Sh300 million in believing that he was selling him a contested prime parcel of land in Nairobi.

    Mr Mwangi through his company Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd bought the property through Andrew Sunkuli and Samson Omwanza Ombati Advocate.

    Mr Moi, through his advocate Fred Ngatia, said Mr Sunkuli and the lawyer are strangers to him and that he did not authorise the two to sell the property.

    Mr Moi said upon learning of the alleged sale of the land, he made inquiries regarding Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd’s claim of purchase, and established that Samson Omwanza Ombati Advocate was questioned by Directorate of Criminal Investigations due to the complaint filed by the United States International University-Africa (USIU-Africa).

    The 30- acre property in Nairobi, initially owned by Mr Moi, is claimed by Equity Bank boss, the USIU-A and US-based businessman George Kiongera.

    The former President reckons he sold the prime piece of land in upmarket Muthaiga North Estate for Sh500 million to Mr Kiongera in June and has never dealt with DPS International.

    Mr Ngatia says in court papers that upon being requested to furnish evidence of the instructions from the former President to himself, to act as Mr Moi’s advocate, Samson Omwanza Ombati was unable to present the instructions.

    “This was for the reason that Mr Moi had never authorised the said person to act on his behalf in any sale of the property,” Mr Ngatia argues in the court papers.

    Mr Ngatia said the money paid by Mr Mwangi’s Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd, to Omwanza Ombati was consumed by the advocate.

    “Accordingly, Mr Moi did not receive any consideration for the purported disposal,” Mr Ngatia argued.

    Billionaire Mwangi claimed he paid Mr Moi Sh300 million for the land in 2012.

    Mr Moi said in court papers that at no point did Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd hold any discussions with him for the purchase of the said parcel of land, adding, “It is inconceivable that a transaction could have been agreed upon without any consensus by the contracting parties”.

    The former Head of State explained that the sale of the land to Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd appears to have been a well-orchestrated scheme by Samson Omwanza Ombati Advocate and Mr Sunkuli to divest him of his property.

    “Mr Moi to date retains the original certificate of title for the suit property which therefore means the documents used to register a transfer in favour of Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd were forgeries,” lawyer Ngatia.

    Mr Ngatia said the alleged letter of instruction held by Samson Omwanza Ombati and Andrew Sunkuli is dated December 15, 2012, seven months after the fraudulent sale was concluded.

    Mr Moi is seeking an order directed at the chief land registrar to nullify the transfer allegedly made by him to Muthaiga Luxury Homes Ltd, dated April 12, 2012 and registered on May 2, 2012.

    The case will be heard on December 13.

  • Capping Interest Rates Risks Damaging The Kenyan Economy and Stunting Credit Growth, Experts Now Warn

    Capping Interest Rates Risks Damaging The Kenyan Economy and Stunting Credit Growth, Experts Now Warn

    The frontier market of Kenya isn’t often on U.S. or European investors’ radar. It should be. It offers a timely reminder of financial markets’ complacency about the risk of populism; and the attractiveness of bashing banks to win votes.

    East Africa’s most advanced economy has introduced a law setting a cap on commercial lending rates and a floor on deposit payout rates, an instant squeeze on margins that sent shares of Kenyan banks to their lowest in years. Investors were clearly unprepared for a measure designed to make banks poorer — or less greedy, depending on your point of view — in the face of what Kenyan President Uhuru Kenyatta described as ordinary citizens’ frustrations about the cost of credit and earnings from deposits.

    Kenya Crush
    Bank stocks have plunged since the announcement of a law to cap lending interest rates
    Source: Bloomberg

    There’s no denying Kenyan banks make rich returns. The country’s largest bank by assets, KCB, has a return on equity of 24.7 percent, according to Bloomberg data, while rivals Cooperative Bank and Equity Group are on 24.5 percent and 26.9 percent respectively. That’s not just leagues ahead of the 5-7 percent ROE at Europe’s biggest banks, it beats the 15-18 percent at South Africa’s top lenders. Market concentration may have something to do with it: Kenya’s seven biggest lenders (there are about 43 in total) hold 80 percent of the banking system’s cash.

    But capping interest rates risks damaging the Kenyan economy and stunting credit growth, a danger not lost on officials at the country’s central bank and finance ministry, who opposed the measure. If banks stop catering to anyone but the safest credit risk, it may encourage shadow banks or dodgy lenders to step in. If smaller banks find it harder to make ends meet, they may get bought up, making those dominant banks even bigger. And the new loan cap, at 4 percentage points above the base central bank rate, sets a potentially “unreasonable” ceiling for Kenya’s risk premium, according to investment firm Cytonn.

    So why take such a chance? Well, next year’s election and a bank-bashing law may be just the ticket to win votes. Some analysts reckon it’s a purely populist move.

    Yet the sell-off of Kenyan bank stocks over the past month suggests markets weren’t adequately prepared for this risk, with the chorus of credible dissenting voices perhaps lulling investors. And while it’s easy to dismiss this as the kind of problem specific to emerging markets, there are echoes of the anti-elite vibe in Europe and the U.S.

    Championing the banks, in particular, isn’t much of a vote winner. The U.S. election has put the restoration of Glass-Steagall back on the table, with Republicans calling for big banks to be broken up. British chancellor Philip Hammond is trying to put a protective arm around the City of London by exploring continued access to Europe’s single market, but he’s clashing with the crowd-pleasing instincts of the “three Brexiteers”, Boris Johnson, Liam Fox and David Davis.

    There’s still hope that pragmatism will prevail. Calls for a restoration of Glass-Steagall look like posturing, while Moody’s reckons that even if the U.K. quit the single market, its finance firms could probably still do plenty of business in the EU.

    Yet the Kenya experience shows the potential for nasty surprises in a populist age, whether self-harming or not. Don’t forget that Brexit itself caught investors on the hop.

    Adopted from Bloomberg

  • Fact Checking on Mobile Loans and Mshwari As Interest Rates Capping Pressure Piles

    Fact Checking on Mobile Loans and Mshwari As Interest Rates Capping Pressure Piles

    maxresdefault

    As the dust settles on the implementation of new laws on loans and deposits interest rates, the focus is now shifting towards areas that may not have been addressed explicitly or sufficient in the law, that has received praises from the mwananchi and sharp criticism from economists on its long-term effect on the economy, and that’s the Mobile money space.

    Since a mid-last week, M-Shwari (a product of CBA and Safaricom) has come under attack from the Consumers Federation of Kenya (COFEK) as well as competitors, who claim that the product should be subjected to the Kenya Banking (Amendment) Act, 2016.

    COFEK argued, “The law is clear that it applies to all loans. Whether offered directly or indirectly, any loan from a licensee of the Central Bank of Kenya via an agent and or mobile phone or any other technology is not exempt from the 4 per cent over and above the Central Bank Rate.” Launched in November 2012, Mswari set the pace for mobile loans attarcting others.

    In seeking expert analysis on the Mshwari facts as policy of Kenya Insights, material available indicate that, there is no interest levied on M-Shwari loans. The only cost to the borrower is a one-off facilitation fee of 7.5%, charged at disbursement. Time value of money: Tenor of M-Shwari loans is 30 days only, as compared to competing products have longer tenors.

    Interest and Fees/Charges are two different types of revenue.
    Facility fees in the case for M-Shwari is return the lender earns from the activity of arranging credit. Fees are charged as either absolute amounts or relative amounts. Given the short-term nature of the credit (30 days) and the fact that a customer can payback sooner (at any time within the 30 days), it is more appropriate to levy a fee over interest.

    Interest on the other hand follows the concept of time value of money and earns the lender an increasing return over time, for as long as the loan is outstanding. As such, interest is quoted per defined period either as per annum (over 12 months) or per month, etc. M-Shwari loans are levied a fee against the amount disbursed, irrespective of the repayment duration.

    If COFEK’s position was to carry the day, we are likely to witness the following scenarios; Erosion of gains in Financial Inclusion- this is because it is the low income earners who usually use M-Shwari on a regular basis for economic gain. If M-Shwari is not viable for business, the bank may be forced to do away with it thereby reversing the gains that have positioned Kenya where it is.

    Experts are warning that we would be facing an Economic slowdown/ exclusion- Many traders will be unable to access the more expensive lending products leading to the death of a number of businesses. High cost of credit- Alternative products are more expensive and this includes loan sharks. Failure to repay the loan on time, has very adverse repercussions. Tax Implications- CBA pays taxes on income from M-Shwari. Loan sharks and other competing products do not pay taxes.

    Among these areas is mobile savings and lending, as well as discussions on who will lead in the efforts to amend the law and what will be reviewed therein. As the President said when signing the law, “We will implement the new law, noting the difficulties that it would present, which include credit becoming unavailable to some consumers and the possible emergence of unregulated informal and exploitative lending mechanisms.” It is not in doubt that the cracks are already emerging.
    Quick Statistics
    • Over 420,000 loan applications are made every day
    • Over 70,000 loans are processed daily on M-Shwari.
    • Majority of the loans are repaid within 30 days.
    • Average loan amount is Kes. 3,200.
    • Current NPL is by far, much lower by average than the ones you would find in commercial banks
    • CBA has increased the interest rate on deposits made to M-Shwari accounts- in line with The Banking (Amendment) Act, 2016
    • Close to 16 million customers on M-Shwari have made CBA the biggest bank by customer numbers
    • Many small businessmen use M-Shwari as their working capital- with some borrowing and repaying up to 7 times a day.
    • CBA has similar propositions to M-Shwari the E.A. region and plans are afoot to extend the footprint to other markets in the African continent. In Tanzania, CBA partners with Vodacom to offer M-Pawa (5 million customers), whilst in Uganda the bank has partnered with MTN to offer the recently launched MoKash.

    Like in the media, who opposed digital migration, the banking players in Kenya have also been hesitant on adopting the new changes so it really shouldn’t come as a surprise when they pull dark innuendos but one thing we can’t deny is the fact that mobile loans has been to the advantage of the mwananchi who can now sit at the comfort of their homes and get a quick loan at the touch of a button a break from the traditional tedious ordeal in securing a loan from the Banks.

  • The M-Pesa Story That Safaricom Want To Remain Untold

    The M-Pesa Story That Safaricom Want To Remain Untold

    Safaricom CEO, Bob Collymore
    Safaricom CEO, Bob Collymore

    A quick survey around Kenya or the streets of Nairobi on the origins of Mpesa will have you fooled. Over 80% of us Kenyans believe Mpesa is a national treasure that encapsulates the innovative potential of the Kenyan people. But, the reality is far from this. Since 2008, we have been deceived on the brand of a foreign corporate colonial in bed with a corrupt Kenyan elite. Mpesa is an ongoing Heist and is not Kenyan invention by any measure.

    Today, it is no coincidence that Safaricom and Mpesa run and control almost all aspects of our lives. Our mobile phones, bank services, taxi service, government payment services and even Nairobi’s Big Brother 24/7 security cameras. Behind the big green brand that is now synonymous with our country, is a carefully weaved scheme to rob unsuspecting Kenyans. Safaricom and Mpesa are golden egg laying geese for Kenya’s rooted political elite. A money minting machine.

    To understand how it all comes together, it is important to connect the dots and dig deep. This is what we did and the revelations are shocking to say the least. What you are about to read is an 8 part investigative report on the roots of Mpesa, Safaricom, CBA Bank and the daylight robbery that is going on in Kenya.

    The True Origins of Mpesa
    “Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.” George Santayana

    The history of Mpesa dates begins at Vodafone UK’s strategic office in 2003 (source) . Vodafone was experimenting with new products for its emerging business unit. The basic idea was to partner with the UK government’s DFID Financial Deepening Challenge Fund (FDCF) to churn out innovative ideas in line with millennium development goals. After a successful proposal, workshops were organized in Nairobi and Dar Es Salaam. On 11 October, 2005, a pilot partnership followed between the Safaricom, Faulu Kenya, a microfinance institution (MFI), and Commercial Bank of Africa.

    A team led by Nick Hughes and Susan Lonie was put together to drive the Kenyan initiative. Originally, M-pesa was conceived to streamline Microfinance Institution (MFI) manual based operation. However, person to person money transfer turned out to be the killer app, shelving the original use cases.

    A team led by Nick Hughes and Susan Lonie was put together to drive the Kenyan initiative. Originally, M-pesa was conceived to streamline Microfinance Institution (MFI) manual based operation. However, person to person money transfer turned out to be the killer app, shelving the original use cases.

    At the time, Safaricom was heavily linked to the Moi political class of the 90s. Ex-President Moi, Biwott and unknown associates owned of 12.5% of Safaricom via a veiled ownership through Mobitelea. Safaricom was perfect for this project
    Once Mpesa exhibited early signs of success, Safaricom and Vodafone executives green lighted the project.

    Once Mpesa exhibited early signs of success, Safaricom and Vodafone executives green lighted the project.

    Sagentia, a technology consultancy firm based out of Cambridge was contracted to build out everything. Not only did the firm write the software for Mpesa, it also designed the business processes, and provided operational and technical support during the pilot and after launch (source). This is the true origin of Mpesa, the rest is history.

  • Nation Media Group’s Daily Nation Newspaper Struggling To Survive As Company Makes Huge Losses

    Nation Media Group’s Daily Nation Newspaper Struggling To Survive As Company Makes Huge Losses

    joe

    Things are evidently not looking up well at the troubled His Highness Aga Khan Empire, Nation Media Group has reported a 15% drop in half-year after-tax profits to Ksh 785.4 million compared to Ksh 925.2 million reported in the same period last year. The drop was largely as a result of a 7.8% drop in group turnover to KSh 5.6 billion despite the management blaming government’s failure to pay bills on time.

    Profit before tax stood at Ksh 1.15 Billion, representing a 20% drop from the Ksh 1.43 Billion posted in the same period in 2015. Delayed payments increased by a small margin of Ksh 23.5 Million to Ksh 163.6 Million versus Ksh 140 Million posted in June 2015. NMG is putting the bulk of blames on state-owned entities accounted for a significant part of this bad debts.

    Print revenue especially from the major outlet Daily Nation, which contributes to over 80% of the group’s revenue fell by 9%. The dwindling in figures from the weak sales of the newspaper has seen the company laying off some staff. The stability of NMG hangs on the sales from print and a fall in numbers sends shivers across the rest of the establishments.

    Earnings from the group’s digital business grew by 90% though this accounts for less than 5% of its total revenues. However, the company says they plan to increase the digital division’s contribution to total earnings to 10% within the next three years. This explains why NMG has revamped their focus on digital presence.

    They seem to be shifting efforts from traditional print to digital where the audience have migrated to. Earlier this year, following poor returns, NMG closed down two radio stations which they switched their transmission bases to digital and sublimed Qtv, this also led to the mass layoff of journalists. With the newspaper sales that forms the backbone of NMG’s existence faced with a possible extinction, the future of the Group remains shaky and uncertain.

  • Expert Analysis: Interest Rates Capping, A Populist Move By President Uhuru Built On Sand Disastrous To The Economy In Long Run

    Expert Analysis: Interest Rates Capping, A Populist Move By President Uhuru Built On Sand Disastrous To The Economy In Long Run

    President Uhuru signs into law the interest capping bill in Statehouse.
    President Uhuru signs into law the interest capping bill in Statehouse.

    By Philip Makokha

    That same day Jesus went out of the house and sat by the lake.2 such large crowds gathered around him that he got into a boat and sat in it, while all the people stood on the shore. 3 Then he told them many things in parables, saying: “A farmer went out to sow his seed. 4 As he was scattering the seed, some fell along the path, and the birds came and ate it up. 5 Some fell on rocky places, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly, because the soil was shallow. 6 But when the sun came up, the plants were scorched, and they withered because they had no root. 7 Other seed fell among thorns, which grew up and choked the plants. 8 Still other seed fell on good soil, where it produced a crop—a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown.

    The above text comes from the book of Matthew chapter 13. It piqued my interest because, government policies are like seed. The sower is the government- legislature, judiciary and executive. Assuming, an ordinary man immediately appeared after the seeds had started germinating, he would have been thrilled by the seeds sown on rocky ground that had sprung up quickly. I bet, he would even thank the sower.

    It is human nature, to live in the present and enjoy facades, which are our daily lives. On August 24, 2016, H.E President Uhuru Kenyatta assented to the Banking amendment Act (2015) which among other things introduces interest rate ceilings and floors. In his statement after signing the law, the president says “…Upon weighing carefully all these considerations, on balance, I have assented to the Bill as presented to me. We will implement the new law, noting the difficulties that it would present, which include credit becoming unavailable to some consumers and the possible emergence of unregulated informal and exploitative lending mechanisms.

    First, let us start from the very basics. Interest is the price charged on money. Since it is presented as a percentage, we refer to it as a rate. Interest rate ceilings/restrictions/caps refer to the maximum interest rate charged by the lender to the borrower. On the other hand, interest rate floor refers to the minimum interest paid on bank deposits i.e. deposit rate. The difference between the two is the SPREAD.

    Ordinarily, these interest rates are driven by market forces- demand and supply. Market forces work best in a perfect competition market. This is a market where among other features; it has many buyers and sellers. Other markets are monopoly, oligopoly etc. It is not possible in practice, to find a market that is 100% its type e.g.100% perfect competition or oligopoly. Ordinarily, we characterize a market as perfect competition if the features of a pure competition dominate features of alternative market structures. Other than markets, we also need to look at different types of economies. An economy can be Command, free or mixed. Generally, Kenya is a free market economy. As to whether, the banking sector in Kenya is oligopoly or pure competition, I do not know. Theoretically however, it is a pure competition. The Kenyan economy is majorly free enterprise where an owner of capital can put it in any sector and await returns. Of course, there are regulations governing each of the sectors that an entrepreneur may venture into. These regulations are not necessarily barriers to entry.

    INTEREST RATE AS PRICE FOR MONEY AND ITS DETERMINATION

    Let us throw this animal called interest rate out of the window for a moment. Let us talk about and ordinary good-sugar. How is price for sugar determined? In any business transaction, there are two parties involved. The buyer (demand) and the seller (supply). The buyers want to buy at the lowest possible prices while the sellers want to sell at the highest possible price. So how is the price determined? The sellers will set a price that covers their production costs plus a mark up. The buyer wants to buy at a price that gives them value for money. In a market with only one seller and many buyers, the seller is likely to exploit the buyers while in a market with only one buyer and many sellers, the buyer is likely to benefit. In practice, there exist many buyers and sellers and therefore prices of items are determined at an equilibrium point. On a graphical presentation, this is the level where quantity demanded equals to quantity supplied. QUANTITY DEMANDED IS NOT DEMAND! The prices will generally hang in this range. The interest rate is determined in a similar manner.

    BANKING IN KENYA: OLIGOPOLY OR PERFECT MARKET?

    The answer to the above question depends on who you ask. Generally speaking, financial industry is a pure competition. There are many sellers and information is readily available. For example, you can easily know what Bank X charges as interest rate compared to Bank Y. Thanks to the Central bank of Kenya. Some people argue that banking industry is an oligopoly- there is a small number of sellers who control the market. To some extent, this is true. Kenya is dominated by less than 10 banks even though we have in excess of forty banks in operation. These banks, it is argued work in a cartel-like manner thereby charging unnecessarily high interest rates. What high interest rate is, am yet to understand.

    WHY INTEREST RATE CEILING AND ‘FLOORS?’

    Hon. Jude Njomo, having studied the cartel-like behavior of commercial banks and their high interest rates, deemed it appropriate to regulate the interest rates that banks charge in order to cushion the common man-Wanjiku. From what I gather, Wanjiku is a group of people at the bottom of the economic pyramid. Members of parliament therefore, deem it unfair and predatory for the banks to continue exploiting these members of the society. The attempt to cap interest rate is a third one since the last two decades. The other two attempts having been made by the former mp Joe Donde and Hon. Jakoyo Midiwo. The bill, now the Act addresses many things, among them interest rate capping. This is what this article is about. Many countries have tried capping interest rates including Zambia in 2013. The law has since been abolished. Around the world, approximately 76 countries have some sort of interest rate capping. Some sort because, not all interest rate capping work as the one we have enacted.

    A study by Samuel Munzele Maimbo and Claudia Alejandra Henriquez Gallegos titled,
    ‘Interest Rate Caps around the World Still Popular, but a Blunt Instrument’ reports:
    ‘In this exercise, we found that the main reasons for using interest caps on loans were to protect consumers from excessive interest rates, to increase access to finance, and to make loans more affordable. Most countries regulate interest rates with the broad aim of protecting consumers, as in the case of Spain. Other countries provided more specific objectives, such as protecting the weakest parties (Portugal); shielding consumers from predatory lending and excessive interest rates (Belgium, France, the Kyrgyz Republic, Poland, the Slovak Republic, and the United Kingdom); stopping the abuses arising from too much freedom (Greece); controlling over-indebtedness (Estonia); and decreasing the risk-taking behavior of credit providers (the Netherlands). Similarly, in Thailand authorities stated that the purpose of the caps was to make finance affordable for low-income borrowers.3 Finally, Zambia’s authorities introduced the caps to mitigate the perceived risk of over indebtedness and the high cost of credit, as well as to enhance access to the underserved.
    The Zambia law was abolished three months later.

    WHAT INTEREST RESTRICTIONS WILL DO

    There are two probable things that restricting interest rates will do. One, what the government tells us that will happen and the second happening is what economic theory supports. I will talk about both cases.

    According to the government and the supporters of the law, low interest lending rates will increase access to credit by Micro, small and medium enterprises. It will also increase access to credit by families that could not afford credit facilities under a regime without the caps. This will boost productivity and ultimately improve economic growth. Jobs will be created and we shall be a few steps away from achieving a million jobs a year as promised by Jubilee. The government will also achieve greater financial inclusion rates for the Kenyan citizen.

    On the other hand, interest rate floors set for saving deposits (deposit rate) will encourage a savings culture thereby ultimately, boosting our economic growth. After all, a saving economy is a growing economy. It is however, misleading to think that limiting deposit rates at 70% of CBR will encourage savings. According to the Central bank, the deposit rate as of April 2016 was 6.92% .With the new low; it will be at least 7%. I do not think a marginal increase of 0.08 will do anything to encourage savings. With the 6.92% of deposit rate, our saving rate is at a mere 1.4%. The interest rate floor will thus, have negligible effect, if any. Low lending rates encourage investment as well as consumption and both these activities are good for economic growth. By controlling deposit rates, the government will be able to arrest any inflationary pressure that would have occurred because of availability of cheap loans. Whereas these arguments are convincing, they are flawed.

    However, according to economic theory, two scenarios are more likely to occur. First, availability of cheap loans will increase liquidity in the economy. The question that begs is what is the effect of an increase in money in circulation? An increase in money in circulation will automatically increase consumption. If the increase in money is not accompanied by a commensurate increase in production, as is likely to be the case in Kenya, there is likely to be inflation.

    There will be too much money chasing too few goods! This inflationary pressure will lower the purchasing power of our money. The real value of our shilling will be eroded. For example, Ksh.1000 will buy less than it could have bought prior to interest rate restriction. As a result of this pressure, workers will demand more pay. This will cause industrial unrest and production will plunge further because of time wasted on pay negotiations.

    If employers will agree to increase salaries, the cycle will continue. This policy therefore, creates a vicious cycle that is a zero-sum game.
    The second likely event to occur according to economic theory is credit rationing. A key component of interest rate is the risk aspect. Banks generally weigh the risk profile of a client and adjust the rate accordingly before advancing a facility.

    A client either has low risk profile or high risk profile. A client with a good credit history and a regular stream of income is less risky than a client who is probably borrowing for the first time. In a regime where interest rates have no upward limit, banks will accommodate the riskier client by adjusting the rates accordingly. On the other hand, if the rate has a cap, and the risk profile of a client cannot fit within this regime, the best alternative is to deny that client the facility all together.

    These clients are SMEs and Wanjiku. Apparently, the very people this legislation intends to protect. From my experience, when someone wants money, the cost is not their priority. The priority is AVAILABILITY. And this is why; Shylocking is a thriving business in Kenya. This ‘locking out’ of potential borrowers, will lead to establishment of more informal lending businesses that are likely to exploit the public much more. The president notes this in his statement. Kenyans will be exploited much more by the unregulated sector of shylocks!

    WHAT WORKS?

    Spain is among the few countries that have a law similar to what the president assented to on August 24, 2016. Does it work? Whereas interest rates are low in Spain, studies show that it boasts of notoriously high charges. This means, what the banks cannot make through interest, they make through other charges. This is also a possibility. If these charges too, are capped, the banking industry is going to be a no-go zone for investors. Investors like to put their money where it generates the highest possible returns. Since the major role of management is to maximize shareholder value, caps limiting their ability to achieve this goal can only mean one thing: COST REDUCTION.

    A huge percentage of total costs for many businesses are labour related and thus, banks may be forced to freeze hiring of new staff or reduce their workforce so as to continue making profits. Is this job creation? Banks are henceforth going to invest much more in technology and less in human labour in order to return value to shareholders.

    The best alternative of handling the high interest rates would have been more of moral than legislative. For example, the government through CBK would have advised bank executives to set aside some percentage of their loan portfolio for SMEs and Wanjiku. This alternative accompanied by threats of legislation would have yielded much better results in the long run. We can think of this as setting up of EPZ in the manufacturing industry. In fact, the government could even decide to tax income generated from this portfolio at a lower rate or give it a tax holiday. This would boost credit access to the marginalized without interfering with the banks’ independence. This is more likely to stimulate economic growth and development. Controlling interest rates is sowing on a rock; the seeds will spring quickly because the soils are shallow. They will however, not live for long as they have no roots. Let’s sow in deep fertile soils. It may take long for the seeds to germinate, but when they do…they will grow to maturity and yield maybe thirty times or more of what we sow!
    Finally, s I conclude, I would like to paraphrase Dr, Ndii, no amount of growling at critics is going to make foolish policy wise.

    The writer Is a degree holder in Commerce, specializing in Finance from JKUAT And a hustler with ideas that can change the world.
    Twitter: @pcmakokha | Facebook: PC Makokha | IG: PC Makokha

    DisclaimerThis article expresses the author’s opinion only. The views and opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent those of Kenya Insights or its Editors. We welcome opinion and views on topical issues. Email:[email protected]

  • How a Barclays Bank Customer Lost Sh.600,000 in a Click, A Usual Insider Fraud Scheme

    How a Barclays Bank Customer Lost Sh.600,000 in a Click, A Usual Insider Fraud Scheme

    Barclays Bank HQs in Nairobi
    Barclays Bank HQs in Nairobi

    A stressed fan of my investigation pieces approached me with what is not shocking since I’ve heard such cries before. Because of security reasons and on her request, her identity shall remain anonymous. The names used in this article are fictitious with the story continuing as it was narrated.

    Marion works with Qatar Airways as an air hostess and lives in a Gulf city where she mostly spends most of her times on land notwithstanding the fact that nearly all her time she’s afloat the air.

    With her career catching up and the pay smiling on the other side, she thought wise to make savings back home. After consolidation, she chose on Barclays bank as the right prospect to use given its worldwide presence, and since she’s a trot, that would present a better option.

    Two weeks ago, she flew back to Kenya, opened a savings account with Barclays made a deposit of over a million bob. Considering her investment was in better hands, she continued with her work, flew to the US almost immediately after opening the account.

    Unfortunately, while in the US, she was mugged and lost her purse plus her phones too. Being precautious, she almost immediately called Barclays Bank back home as a security measure on her account. Travelled back to her residential Gulf country where she renewed her line she was initially using.

    This was when the cat and mouse games with the staff in Nairobi started. Marion originally opened the account with her Kenyan phone number linked to it, and now that she wasn’t in a position to access that line which went along with her stolen items, she filed to have contact number changed to her present’s.

    cash

    She intended to access the money in her account, and the only way of doing this was by activating internet banking. A pin is supposed to be sent to her number to activate the system. Before this could happen, the staff were to send her forms via email to fill for the internet banking system to be activated.

    Concealed to her, a fleecing scheme was in its primary stages with the communication spark. Instead of promptly, sending the forms, they bought time and only sent them to her days later and this when she discovered the shock of her life.

    Someone had fraudulently accessed her account and withdrew Sh.600,000 in an unexplainable transfer. Faced with the bitter reality and shocking discovery, she called the bank to inquire how this possibly happened while herself hadn’t made any transfer transaction. As usual, they told her to give them time as the fraud unit worked to establish how this could’ve happened.

    From my investigations, there are minimal incidences that this could’ve happened, and all pointers take the directions at an insider plot at the bank. When Marion lost her items, she didn’t have her Barclays ATM card in it. In fact, she’s yet to collect the card from the bank. This rules out cybercrime instance by stealing bank details by blackhat criminals.

    airhostess

    She was yet to activate internet banking service so there were nearly zero percent chances of effecting internet transactions by fraudsters or herself unless the bank had activated this service without her consent. Which in that case is criminal.

    As she would later come to realise, the transaction was enabled via mobile banking, a service that again she hadn’t subscribed for. The only person who activates this, the bank. A basic explanation here, someone inside the bank enabled this services, accessed her account, transferred the cash without her knowledge.

    The bank would’ve locked down her account the moment she called to inform them of her items lost and asking to switch contact numbers. They took a time to send her the internet banking activation emails in what now looks like a strategy to buy time for them to cook ways of accessing her account and making the illegal transfers.

    The bank insists, they’re investigating the matter, but these developments expose what could be a bigger scandal going on within the bank. You can bet this isn’t an isolated case and that the staff could be actively involved in this fraud plot. If this amount is anything to go by then billions could be lost to rogue bankers schemes annually.

    The bank must come out and weed out the criminal elements in the desks, crippling many people’s incomes, unless, its party to the larger syndicate. Marion is patiently waiting for answers, as she waits the fraudsters could be preying on another victim. Are you a victim of this same scheme or any fraudulent deals going on at any local bank? Email me ([email protected]) I will investigate the matter and expose the evil elements.

    Save

  • FLY 540 At It Again, Throws Out Passenger With DISABILITY

    FLY 540 At It Again, Throws Out Passenger With DISABILITY

    Fly 540 crew gets aboard the plane
    Fly 540 crew gets aboard the plane

    Fly 540 Aviation Company yet again finds itself in the wrong spotlight following discrimination claims by a physically handicapped client. Mr Muhib Noorani, the proprietor of Rocky Driving School, is the latest victim of a worrying trend of disdain for Persons with Disabilities (PwD) by the airline. Mr Muhib says that the airline’s staff in Eldoret denied him access to the aircraft because of his physical condition.

    “I booked Fly 540 as I had been told there was no other flight. I checked in at 6.35pm, but they wouldn’t let me aboard. They didn’t give any explanation for the refusal. I was asked to look for other means to get to my destination and let the other passengers behind me check in,” he narrated in an emotional testimony.

    “This is the first time I’ve been made aware of my disability. I had to speak out so that other citizens in a similar condition don’t have to go through such trauma. Disability is not inability, and we didn’t choose to be this way.”

    Unpleasant history

    This is not the first time a complaint has been lodged against the low-cost aircraft. A few months ago, another PwD- a paediatrician at Nyeri Provincial Hospital, complained of a ‘dark-skinned, very tall and intimidating’ Fly 540 pilot who had kicked her out of the aircraft claiming that she was going to delay everyone.

    Dr Agnes Mithamo said that the pilot wouldn’t even let some volunteers help her up the stairs of the plane. “The pilot told me that he had the powers to decide whether I was going to use the aircraft or not. He ordered the men who had volunteered to help me aboard to take me back to the lounge. It was humiliating.”

     

    In 2014, Bishop Jackson Kosgei, the current chairperson of Kenya Film Classification Board and father to musician Emmy Kosgei, was forced to crawl his way out of the aircraft after the staff blatantly refused to help him disembark.

    The chairperson of Kenya Disability Parliamentary Association (KEPIDA), nominated MP Isaac Mwaura, has condemned such incidences and said that they will call for sterner actions such as suspension of the airline’s license since even parliamentary summons has failed to tame the practice. “We cannot allow systemic discrimination of Kenyans with disabilities,” Mr Mwaura has warned.

    A Fly 450 response to a client on Facebook stating their policies on persons with disability
    A Fly 450 response to a client on Facebook stating their policies on persons with disability

    Save

  • Cost of Corruption, American Company Dumps Kenya for Uganda after Sh5Billion Loss in Fraud

    Cost of Corruption, American Company Dumps Kenya for Uganda after Sh5Billion Loss in Fraud

    CIGARETTES

    As corruption scandals continue to cloud institutions in Kenya and killing mega investments, the latest company to bow out of Kenyan market is Americas, One Alliance. The U.S based tobacco firm One Alliance has called off its contract with Kenyan farmers.

    Following forensic auditing that was carried out by a third party audit company hired by the American firm. One Alliance says they spent Sh.180Million to investigate the fraud in their Kenyan subsidiary which revealed up to Sh.5Billion was lost in an insider fraud scam.

    The company had contracted 1,000 farmers in Migori which are the region’s biggest tobacco producer to supply it with the raw product for making cigarettes. One alliance has since cancelled their contract with Kenyan farmers and now engaging Uganda for the raw material.

    Migori farmers had been contracted to supply the American company with tobacco to its processing plant in Thika. “improper accounting occurred at our Kenyan entity resulting in approximately $50.8 million of discrepancies, mainly in inventory and accounts receivable that stretches back to at least 2008,” read part of the company’s statement.

    Tobacco Farmer in Migori
    Tobacco Farmer in Migori

    Insider dealings as that of the One Alliance has seen many big companies in Kenya call off their contracts if not collapsing. Uchumi Supermarket is on the verge of closing their shops. Imperial, Dubai and Chase Bank were both put on receivership following dirty inner frauds.
    Another South African Company, Haco Tiger under the chair of the industrialist Chris Kirubi after forensic auditing was found to be another case of insider deals.

    Directors accused of manipulating their data including profits. Investor confidence is key in any venture, and the corruption state in Kenya continue to swallow many and a discouragement to many investments.

    The cancellation by One Alliance now leaves British American Tobacco an upper hand as the region’s biggest buyer of Tobacco.

    Save

    Save

  • The Cry Of An Imperial Bank Depositor To CBK Governor Patrick Njoroge

    The Cry Of An Imperial Bank Depositor To CBK Governor Patrick Njoroge

    It all started on the 13th of October. I went to the bank only to find a notice attached to the door stating the bank is currently under receivership. At first, I thought it was probably wind up as only a month before did I fix a deposit with the bank. I have worked for no less than 35 years of my life through so many ups and downs. But none comes close to what I felt on the day that I saw the bank being placed under receivership.

    A receivership in other regions of the world usually bodes well for the depositors and creditors but ‘this is Kenya’ was the first thing that struck my mind. I felt like collapsing. My family, my kids hard earnt money is locked up in IBL. What was I going to say to them? Most people have limited or no faith in the Kenyan judicial system. Justice in Kenya is something that has never been easy to achieve, in most cases it’s nonexistent. Most of my friends from around the world thought I was crazy in investing in Kenya.

    At the time, I disagreed with them and went ahead to give my family a stable life. For some people like the shareholders, they deal in billions. I don’t expect even to come close to those figures in my lifetime. I was happy with what I had. God had blessed me and helped me achieve what others might deem to be nothing.

    My family to this day is torn over what the Kenya’s central bank’s governor will decide in regards to the fate of our locked deposits and funds. We are simple people. We are old. We invested our money

    We have never taken a cent from anyone. We spent our money to help us reach our goal which was to  eventually have enough to get one house for our family. Everything has been taken away from us and all other innocent depositors in an instant. We were grateful when we got the first Sh.1M released to us, but that’s just a small portion compared to what we had in the bank. Is it right that we work so hard in our life for years only to have our money frozen away from us without any form of access to it?

    We paid our taxes, obeyed his law. We always believed that the laws are there to protect us. Were we wrong? Worked hard. Saved money for old age, for giving our family a headstart only to

    Imperial Bank Offices
     Then get robbed. I recall the president of Kenya saying no depositor will lose a penny. That all will be fully reimbursed was he only referring to chase bank? Are imperial bank customers not people? Why isolate us? We are all people created by God. We shouldn’t be discriminating people based on their caste or nationality or color.

    We, depositors, feel as if we are being discriminated against. Only three weeks to go until we learn of the way forward. Only three weeks to go until we learn of the way forward. But do you think it would be fair to announce a way forward without giving us access to at least a substantial amount of money to keep businesses, family, bills amongst other stuff going?

    What have we done to deserve to wait for eight months without any meaningful access to our money? DR NJOROGE I know you know the world is following the IBL case with a keen eye but please don’t just focus on turning this into criminal proceedings that will drag on while we depositors are left to suffer. We did our part.

    We fulfill all our responsibilities to the Kenyan government. We trusted the regulator to be able to sniff anything that was about to go wrong before it caused severe damage to depositors. We feel that we have been failed. We depositors are not to blame for any of this but for some reason, we are getting punished the most.

    At times, I feel that you are more focused on other stuff rather than the depositors , the people that matter. Why are we depositors getting punished? Why do we feel that we are being blamed for their shareholders lack of cooperation towards CBK?

     Imperial Bank board chairman Alnashir Popat is overcome with emotions during a briefing
    Imperial Bank board chairman Alnashir Popat is overcome with emotions during a briefing

    You said you were raised up to help people. Why don’t you help us IBL depositors? We ain’t asking for anything more other than what belongs to us. Losing even 10% of our money could take more than a year or 2 to claw back. We have suffered enough. Days are getting tougher, times getting slower. It’s the month of Ramadhan. We can’t even afford to pay zakat to our old folks. People that have been dependent on us for decades. What do we say to them? We don’t know what to think anymore. Who in all of this truly wants to help us?

    Who in all of this truly wants to help us? We hope it’s you Njoroge but until the end of June we won’t know. Please put yourself in our shoes just for a day and then tell us how you would have felt both mentally and emotionally. Is it right that thousands are made to suffer due to a problem that’s outside their control? We expected CBK to be cracking down on rogue bankers.

    Imperial Bank Depositors demonstrating in Nairobi
    Imperial Bank Depositors demonstrating in Nairobi

    Mistakes can happen and it might have slipped through their watch by accident or they might have been involved or shareholders planned everything step by step including the limiting of evidence to avoid being found guilty. Our question is how is this of any help to us? We are still suffering. The statements being released by shareholders, the media are not helping. If anything it deepens our pain even more… if you want Kenya to be great, Njoroge start by sympathizing with us.

    Start by giving us access to our hard earned money. Start by ensuring we all get our money back in full if possible. But please don’t make us wait anymore than what we have been asked to wait so far. We will wait till end of June but we can’t help but fear that in Kenya people’s hope are built up only to then get crashed down. Please give us access to what was ours. Don’t punish us for the regulator and shareholders disagreements.

    Save

  • Why the voice of Africa’s informal economy should be heard

    The informal economy in Africa is big business. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) estimates that its average size as a percentage of gross domestic product in sub-Saharan Africa is 41%. This ranges from under 30% in South Africa to 60% in Nigeria, Tanzania and Zimbabwe.

    It is also a huge employer. It represents about three-quarters of non-agricultural employment, and about 72% of total employment in sub-Saharan Africa. About 93% of new jobs created in Africa during that 1990s were in the informal economy.

    The International Labour Office defines the informal economy as:

    All economic activities by workers or economic units that are – in law or practice – not covered or sufficiently covered by formal arrangements.

    Today the informal economy appears to be as important as ever to Africa and its future development. But governments, and international organisations like the World Bank and ILO, do not like the informal economy. As a result international policy has veered from supportive to antagonistic.

    At times opposition to the informal economy has been violent. One example is the notorious Operation Murambatsvina (“get rid of trash”) in Zimbabwe in 2005. At best it is directed at pulling the informal economy into the formal economy.

    Antagonism is driven by a range of reasons. Informal firms do not pay tax. In addition, reports abound of child labour, low wages (especially for women) and low job security as well as high incidence of HIV.

    Yet, as the Swedish International Development Co-operation points out, many governments are unaware of the contribution of the informal economy, particularly the high involvement of women.

    The report also suggests that it is expanding and is here to stay. And a World Bank report points to a trend of people with higher levels of education entering the informal sector as a career of choice.

    A glimpse of the future

    Political economist Fantu Cheru asserts that:

    … a closer look at the informal sector in Africa provides a glimpse of what could be achieved if Africa’s economies and financial policies were more attuned to the continent’s everyday realities.

    He sees the informal economy as being community-based, representing:

    … socio-political entities, with their own rules, forms of organisation and internal hierarchies, constituting a node of resistance and defiance against state domination.

    The point is that practices more closely allied with collectivist communities may be far more appropriate than “modern” management methods. These methods are based on Western principles and neoliberal economic policies. They have largely been discredited as inappropriate to African communities.

    But the informal economy is largely marginalised. It has a weak voice and is rarely listened to by policymakers in government or in international organisations. When policies are made they affect a large percentage of firms, entrepreneurs, employees and communities. But it is unlikely any have been consulted.

    Issues that could be given more prominence in policymaking are access to capital and the provision of relevant training. More important is what the formal economy can learn from the informal economy as a model for economic development.

    Indigenous practices in a globalised world

    If communities that rely on economic activity in the informal sector are indeed the repositories for indigenous management, entrepreneurial and employment practices it is little wonder they are not listened to.

    Indigenous refers to practices, knowledge and values that are related to, and grow out of, local and community circumstances. These often stand in contrast to international or global practices, knowledge and values produced by universities and international corporations.

    The dominant discourse is that indigenous practices are outmoded, archaic and out of tune with modernity. Yet seeing indigenous practices and those in the informal economy as frozen in time is a mistake. Even the glib packaging in management consultancy circles of concepts like “ubuntu” presents a glorified perception of indigenous knowledge being static and timeless.

    As Cheru has pointed out, the informal sector may represent a resistance, an alternative to the prevailing globalised view.

    Even so, it exists in the globalised world. While constantly adapting, sometimes resisting, it is never apart from globalisation. Rather than eschewing modern technology, communications, the internet and social media, Africa has been embracing it. This is happening through:

    • better cellular telecommunications;
    • access to cheap smartphones; and
    • initiatives, not without controversy, such as Facebook’s internet.org, providing free and wider internet access.

    Hence, Facebook told us in June 2014 that:

    … there are 100 million people coming to Facebook every month across the African continent, with over 80% on mobile.

    This includes a majority of people living in the informal economy.

    These developments are providing new tools to trade, to market products and to work. They may even be changing the nature of employment. With practices and organisations still rooted in local contexts and communities, identities are changing.

    In addition, social media has the potential to change things by providing greater voice and potentially better representation.

    Political leaders may have to start listening to entrepreneurs, managers and staff working in the informal economy to formulate more inclusive policies that may prove more relevant to Africa’s development.The Conversation

    By Terence Jackson, Professor of Cross-cultural Management, Middlesex University

    This article was originally published on The Conversation.

    Save

  • CBK names banks with friendly loan rates

    CBK names banks with friendly loan rates

    The Central Bank of Kenya has published average bank lending rates showing the most expensive and least expensive lenders.

    According to the list, Housing Finance and Family Bank have the lowest loan rates in the last quarter of 2015 while Middle East Bank and Guaranty Trust Bank were the most expensive.

    Personal Loan category
    In the personal loans category of between one and five years, K-Rep Bank at 25.7 per cent offered the most expensive credit as at mid-December 2015. Consolidated Bank comes second, charging 25.4 per cent interest as December 15.

    The lender with the third cheapest personal loans is Middle East Commercial Bank at 24.2 per cent. UBA Bank takes the number four slot at 24.1 per cent on personal loans. Guaranty Trust Bank charged 23.7 per cent interest.

    Conversely, in the personal loans category for between one and five years, Habib Bank Ltd at 8.4 per cent charged the cheapest rate. Guardian Bank Ltd at 14.1 per cent offered the second cheapest loans while National Bank of Kenya at 14.7 per cent was the third most affordable. Family Bank and Housing Finance share fourth slot.

    Rates may be higher than stated

    CBK notes that the loanees may actually be paying higher amounts than stated since the banks may levy other fees and charges, including administration, processing, valuation, legal and commitment fees, among others.

    “Therefore the effective rates charged by individual banks may be higher than these published interest rates depending on the other fees and charges levied on loan products by the specific bank,” says the regulator.

    “The actual rates are based on negotiations between the bank and the borrowing customers. It should be noted that the published interest rates only constitute banks’ lending rates.”

    Business Loans
    For business loans repayable between one and five years, K-Rep Bank at 27.2 per cent gave the most costly loans as at December 15. It is followed by Jamii Bora Bank at 24 per cent with Guaranty Trust Bank coming in third at 23.4 per cent.

    Meanwhile NIC Bank at 22.7 per cent comes in at number four as the lender with the most costly loans. Transnational Bank is the fifth most expensive lenders at 23 per cent interest rate.

    Conversely, UBA Kenya at 15.2 per cent offered the cheapest business loans while Gulf African Bank at 16 per cent was the second cheapest lender of business loans. First Community Bank at 16.8 per cent is the third cheapest lender of business loans.

    Diamond Trust Bank at 17.2 per cent is the fourth cheapest lender while Bank of India at a rate of 17.5 per cent is the fifth cheapest lender.

    For the overall average weighted lending rate for each commercial bank which represents the weighted average rate across all loan categories (corporate, business and personal) and maturities (overdraft, 1-5 years and over 5 years) Middle East Commercial Bank at a rate of 24.6 per cent is the most expensive lender.

    It is closely followed by K-Rep Bank at 24.2 per cent which makes it the second most costly lender with Guaranty Trust Bank at a rate of 23.8 per cent becoming the third most expensive lender. Credit Bank at a rate of 22.5 per cent is the fourth mostly costly lender while I&M Bank at 20.8 per cent is the fifth most costly lender.

    The move is meant to promote competition and transparency in pricing of loans and reign in on high interest.

  • Run Down To The Brink Of Bankruptcy, The Fall Of Kenya Airways

    Run Down To The Brink Of Bankruptcy, The Fall Of Kenya Airways

    By Payton Mathau

    For years now, Kenya’s national carrier, Kenya Airways (KQ) profit-and-loss account has been, worryingly, sliding south, with the executives blaming several factors like the cost of fuel, the dropping number of passengers and, more recently, the Ebola outbreak in most parts of West Africa that forced them to suspend flights to these destinations for some time.

    The airline’s chief executive Mbuvi Ngunze, in a recent opinion in the mass circulating weekly newspaper, the Sunday Nation, even blamed that slide on “intense competition and more recently the threat of terrorism…that have adversely impacted global travel. There is also political instability, natural disasters and an increasingly tight regulatory environment,” he wrote.

    The list of excuses has been endless, and even includes the industrial actions by pilots and other cadre of staff.

    Even in the face of the worrying loss-making by the country’s flagship carrier, the executives have remained upbeat, at least on the surface, that KQ has made several positive strides.

    In November 2014, the airline posted a half-year loss of Sh10 billion. This was not isolated because in June 2013, the company had also posted Sh7.9 billion loss for the financial year ending in March 2013.

    “Over the last decade, KQ worked hard to successfully shed the image of an ailing airline dependent on government lifeline. Since it was privatised in the late 1990s, the airline grew rapidly, lifted by strong fundamentals and embracing a culture of competitiveness and innovation. Before the current challenges, KQ was one of the most profitable airlines even earning the “Most Respected Company in East Africa” accolade,” Ngunze’s opinion article in the Sunday Nation read.

    But investigations by Nairobi Law Monthlyhave revealed that the breathtaking extent of loss-making at KQ was perpetrated by the high and mighty, who, even at the moment, are angling to kick out Dutch airline KLM as a major shareholder in favour of the an airline from the Gulf States.

    Many may recall that the Dutch airline KLM, which is now being strenuously pushed out in favour of Etihad, is the one that had stabilised KQ, and their code-sharing framework has not only had positive returns for KQ but also opened for it most of the European routes.

    The investigations uncovered that the genesis of the extreme turbulence KQ is experiencing could be traced back to Anglo Leasing-type deals when top management and senior government officials formed special purpose vehicles (SPVs) to fleece the carrier.

    Majority of these SPVs were incorporated in tax havens like the Cayman Islands, and through a complex web of transactions were buying and selling, or leasing to KQ aircraft at mind-boggling fees.

    As such, the SPVs have, in essence, have continued to strangle the national carrier in a complex web that KQ cannot and will not easily get out from, unless something more radical happens.

    Media blackmail

    Most of these SPVs were incorporated during the former CEO Titus Naikuni’s era, and Ngunze, who took over from Naikuni, was a high-ranking official at KQ.

    Kenya’s local media attempt’s at disclosing these deals have been met with specific threats to journalists as well as the KQ executives withdrawing their adverts, at least until they play along.

    In the early and mid-2000’s, KQ wanted to buy a new fleet of Embraer, the Brazilian-manufactured mid-range, aircraft, but could not make the down payment for the planes to the manufacturer. It thus borrowed money from some financiers to make the down payment.

    In order to borrow the funds for the down payment, KQ transferred the purchase agreement for the fleet of planes to a new company that would become a borrower proxy for KQ.

    According to the documents in possession of NLM, the borrower was Amboseli Limited, a special purpose company that was registered in the Cayman Islands. Amboseli Ltd was structured so that should it go into bankruptcy then KQ was to be at arm’s length – thus the phrase Bankruptcy Remote Orphan (BRO).

    An orphan structure is a financing term referring to a company whose shares are held by a trustee on a non-charitable purpose trust. The company is said to be an “orphan” as it is not beneficially owned by anyone. Orphan structures are usually used in offshore structures to ensure that the assets and liabilities of the subject company (in this case Amboseli Ltd) are treated as “off-balance-sheet” with respect to the sponsor of the structure (in this case Kenya Airways).

    Other reasons for creating an orphan structure are to avoid or minimise regulation which might otherwise apply to a structure, and to ensure that the company is “bankruptcy remote” from companies in the same group as the sponsor. Orphan structures are relatively common features of securitisation vehicles, where the asset backed bonds are issued by the orphan company (Amboseli Limited).

    Shares in Amboseli Limited were to be held in trust for the benefit of whoever is putting up the money for the aircraft purchase. The trustee of all the shares in Amboseli Ltd was yet another special purpose vehicle called Walkers SPV (special purpose vehicle).

    In the agreement, Amboseli Ltd was to use the purchase agreement signed by KQ with the manufacturer of the Embraer aircraft to approach unidentified lenders who would advance the funds necessary for payment and delivery of each plane until the fleet is bought entirely.

    The terms of this agreement was that KQ would pay to Amboseli Ltd the sum of Manufacturers price plus Amboseli Limited’s “running costs” plus interest owed to the lenders engaged by Amboseli Ltd.

    KQ was to repay Amboseli Ltd in instalments in the course of 12 years, according to March 2014 annual report, and each instalment is called a borrower’s contribution.

    The borrower’s contribution is due from KQ whenever Amboseli Ltd is due to make an interest payment on the loan. In each instalment KQ pays the sum of: The interest due to be paid to the lender by Amboseli Ltd plus Amboseli Ltd’s running costs.

    On the delivery date of the aircraft, KQ was to pay Amboseli Ltd the Balance of the purchase price. This means Amboseli Ltd would, on the same delivery date, pay the balance of the purchase price to the manufacturer, plus repay the lender for the particular aircraft.

    In the structure, KQ would only take delivery, not title (the real proof of ownership), of each delivered aircraft. Amboseli Ltd was to deliver the title to another company called Samburu Limited “to whom the Delivery Facility is made by the long term lenders.”

    From the chart in the documents in possession of NLM, the immediate questions were (1) where is Samburu Limited placed on the chart? (2) Who is the facilitating agent referred to on page 1 (paragraph c) of the document?

    As at March 31, 2014, the KQ had 47 aircraft, either owned or on operating leases, according to KQ’s annual report. These comprised five Boeing 777 wide body jets, one Boeing 787, six Boeing 767 wide body jets, 13 Boeing 737 narrow body jets, 20 Embraer regional jets and two Boeing 737 freighters; formerly passenger aircraft, one converted to a freighter during the year, while the other had been converted the previous year.

    Our attempts to get Ngunze, KQ’s CEO, who is officially the company spokesman, to respond to the specific questions were rebuffed, in a response couched to avoid at all any discussions on them.

    “The right process for enquiries into KQ is Wanjiku Mugo, copied, in who is our Corporate Communications Manager. Perusing your questions, it is clear to me that you have not had sight of our annual report where we make disclosures on financing transactions. Kindly refer to the attached on pg (pages) 115, Note 29. This may then inform the questions you have,” said Ngunze, in an e-mail also copied to the company secretary Teodosia Osir, delegating the role of the official company spokesman to his junior.

    From a cursory look, Note 29 answered nothing, at least not the questions we had sent to KQ for their response about the incorporation of the SPVs in the Cayman Island, ownership structures of the lenders and facilitating agents and the net effect of these special purpose companies to KQ.

    Meanwhile, Wanjiku Mugo, who had been delegated to respond to communicate with us, remained cagey, only directing us to the link to the same document Ngunze had pointed at.

    “Thank you for your inquiry. I see Mbuvi (Ngunze) responded to you on where you could find comprehensive answers to your questions. Please refer to our annual reports that are available on our website,” Wanjiku Mugo said.

    Behind the scenes, the KQ management sought to thwart the publication of the exposé, unsuccessfully. When that hit a snag, Ngunze, in an unsolicited opinion article in the Sunday Nation, perhaps to dampen NLM’s queries, sought to challenge “A lot of untruths and innuendos (that) have recently been peddled in the media and other circles regarding Kenya Airways.”

    Meanwhile, KQ’s expansion strategy, Project Mawingu, in the recent past has been the acquisition of the B787-8 Dreamliners, currently Boeing’s flagship product. The national carrier was to borrow, through a similar but complex web a sum of $1 billion (Sh95.4 billion) to purchase the nine Dreamliners.

    In the recent past, perhaps saddled by the debts to some of the interest-bearing loans and borrowings from lenders, which according to the 2014 annual report include Swara Aircraft Financing Limited, Barclays Bank PLC, Ndovu Aircraft Financing Limited, Nyati Aircraft Financing Ltd, Kifaru Aircraft Financing Ltd, Chui Aircraft Financing Ltd, Tsavo Financing LLC and Aberdare Ltd, KQ appears to have ditched buying the expensive Dreamliners. The Dreamliners price averages $225 million (Sh21.5 billion) for a single aircraft.

    Instead, KQ announced that it would be leasing the aircraft from AWAS Aviation Ltd who is to buy them and then lease out to KQ. The decision to abandon purchasing the Dreamliners came after KQ had acquired seven of the nine it had planned to purchase.

    Though AWAS Aviation Ltd is an Ireland firm, information that NLM has exclusively obtained indicates that its ownership structure has many Kenyan interests. In fact, one famous political family in the country, NLM established, could be holding significant interests in not only the firm but most of the KQ’s lenders.

    In March 2014 annual report, KQ also paid to its lenders a staggering Sh89 million up from Sh62 million in 2013. The lenders, the annual report indicates, are Barclays PLC, Citibank NA, Citi/JP Morgan and Afrexim for aircraft loans. Meanwhile, Cooperative Bank financed engine purchases, and KQ also has in its books short term facilities. The tenor of the borrowings range from one to 24 years since 2005, with interest rates of between 3.41 per cent and 6.59 per cent annually.

    “The loans were obtained for the purpose of funding aircraft acquisition, aircraft spare engines and for pre-delivery payments for ordered aircraft. For the purpose of holding collateral for the financiers, the aircraft are registered in the name of special entities whose equity is held by the security trustees on behalf of the respective financiers. The legal title is to be transferred to Kenya Airways Limited once the loans are fully repaid,” the annual report states.

    For now, it seems KQ is in deep turbulence – like Mumias Sugar Company which is seeking Sh5 billion from the government to stay afloat after years of mismanagement – and the carrier may be forced to make an emergency landing. That emergency landing may come very soon and could even jeopardise its intention to fly to new destinations, including the United States.

  • How Kenya Airways was Run Down

    How Kenya Airways was Run Down

    KQ is in a dep mess. The national carrier is a shell of its former self. The thieves have run roughshod and fleeced the company millions in a well crafted scheme which seems to be meant to run it down and then cheaply buy the airline off.

    The people behind the strategy includes former CEO Titus Naikuni, current Finance Director Alex Wainaina Mbugua and 2 top State House (Office of the President) personnel.

    The scheme to run down Kenya Airways started right from the Office of the then President Kibaki and involved senior OP and DoD officials. Also roped into the deal is KQ Finance Director and the current CEO. The Finance Director is said to be so deep into the corrupt deals meant to bring down KQ to its knees that he recently bought 14 very high end properties in Johannesburg with 6 of the properties being located in the affluent Sandton area.

    First, they set up four offshore companies called Twiga, Amboseli, Jetspace and Samburu which knew what aircraft Kenya Airways (KQ) needed and so approached Boeing and Embraer to deliver the same. The problem is that, without investing a single cent, the owners of the companies got KQ LPOs and managed to use the same to get loans from Afro-Exim Services.

    Of the KQ fleet, the Embraer E170 series are being phased and replaced by the E190s. Key individuals in the Office of the President are said to own the 5Y-KYR, KYS and KYT. Another 10 aircrafts with registrations 5Y-FFA to FFJ are said to be owned by another powerful Kenyan family which earns them more than $500,000.

    Currently, none of the Dreamliners (Boeing 787s) are flying. This is because the maintenance cost is so high and the owners who have not been fully paid for the aircrafts are said to be planning to detain some of the planes in case they fly outside the country. One of the planes was recently detained in China and released only at the intervention of key State House officials.

    Most of the KQ board members who are aware of the illegal happenings are pocketing up to $6million per year in kickbacks as they are promised a standing fee per hour clocked by the operational aircrafts.  The recent KPMG report does not mention the illegal withdrawals in KQ reserve accounts in London. It doesn’t even detail the wastage which the company gets by outsourcing engineering work to other airlines.

    Some of the areas which have been used to get money out of KQ includes the outsourcing of various services like training, hotel and catering as well as importation of everything including toothpicks. Take the renovation of the IOCC building which is next to the Presidential Lounge at JKIA. Renovation work were so expensive and KQ ended up importing even pens, water dispensers and seats to spruce up the Engineer’s working area while what was imported could have been acquired cheaply locally.

    Staff using the IOCC (International Operations Control Centre) wondered why KQ had to import water dispensers from Germany while they could get the same locally. The renovation of the building despite the company knowing very well that the building will be brought down when the new runway is being built.

    There was a time KQ spent an average of Ksh 1.5million on each and every staff member on useless trainings which did not benefit the said staff members in any way. The training was compulsory and those who failed to attend were sent on compulsory leave until they took up the training at the KQ Pride Centre.

    One company which benefited most from the uncontrolled KQ outsourcing is the STOIC tracking. The company installed vehicle tracking and fleet management system in KQ vehicles being used on the tarmac to control speed. The speed limit is 25 Km/h. The company was being paid Ksh 4 million per month from 2005/2006 financial year to Dec 2014 when KQ decided to stop the service having realised that it didn’t prevent the staff from exceeding the speed limit on the airport tarmac. Only KQ installed such a service in their vehicles at the airport while the likes of 540, KLM and Qatar did not see such a need.

    Now KQ is not in a state to meet its financial obligations. Staff salaries are paid late and remittances for staff contributions to Union, SACCO, NSSF and NHIF are not being done in time as KQ is left to rummage through the financial mess they created to sort themselves out. In February, KQ staff salaries was only possible after IATA sent the airline its codeshare contributions.

    SACCO remittance happened on 13th March and not February 20th as always. Some contractors like Jubilee Insurance knows the precarious financial situation at KQ very well but want to debts to accrue further so as they would not want to interfere with the relationship.

    The bad financial decisions at KQ started after the 2009 KQ strike where Naikuni told the Cabin Crew that their work and “Cabin Crew ni kama waiter naweza kuenda Kencom na nipate wengi.” (Cabin crews are like waiters who can easily be recruited from Kencom bus stop). That was true to an extent. But consider the cost involved in training the Cabin Crew at Pride Centre. KQ charges over $3,000 for a 6 months Cabin Crew training where they only spend 3 months in class and the others just doing nothing. In fact at KQ, the staff always know that though the work is simple, KQ charges training of the staff more expensively that it would cost to train a medic locally in the same period.

    Naikuni then said that he would teach the Cabin Crew a lesson resulting in the retrenchment of the over 420 cabin crew. KQ then decided to outsource the assignment of recruiting and managing the Cabin Crew to Career Directions which is owned, managed and operated by Naikuni’s long known girlfriend Lucy Mmari.

    KQ was meant to save with the outsourcing but that failed to work as service quality deteriorated. KQ ended up recruiting almost 1,000 new Cabin Crew through Career Directions. The company pays the CCs only Ksh 40,000 from the previous Ksh 80,000. The difference is not a saving to KQ since the airline pays Career Directions around Ksh 120,000 per month per Cabin Crew.

    KQ made no savings on the salaries and there was no need since Cabin Crew salaries was just 1.3% of the total annual cost incurred by the airline. In the meantime, now the new Cabin Crews employed through Career Directions have been made to supervise the old and mature few who remained employed directly by KQ while the mature ones earn better salaries.

    With the quality of cabin service declining, complaints emerged on social media and many at times were Cabin Crew caught having sex with passengers on air or shoplifting make up for personal use (in Bombay in India). Generally, the staff who are so loyal to the national carrier decided to steal to improve on their image. It is now believed that some KQ staff might be engaging in importing contrabands to boost their income as the airline continue to suffer.

    For March, KQ staff who are suppose to be paid on 20th will have to wait for the sale of a Boeing 777 aircraft registration number 5Y-KQT at a cost of $57million to be able to earn their salaries. A brand new 777-200 plane like the KQT being sold goes for just over $250million. Considering that the plane is a 2005 make, the plane being sold is almost brand new. It is however believed that some KQ technical staff might have taken some of its parts leaving the plane being sold a SHELL. But the plane already has a buyer who has paid part of the money.

    According to a senior pilot, “it is just sad that KQ cannot get to enjoy flying the 777s and make money out of them immediately after fully paying for them.”

    Another plane with registration ending KQS is also scheduled for sale. Of the 77-200s, only KQU and KZY are flying but might be up for sale soon. Another plane, a 777-300 with registration ending KZX is parked but sometimes serviced for Amsterdam route.

    Enter the Boeing 787s aka the Dreamliners. Of the 17 staff KQ trained to handle the improved fleet, 6 never touched the KQ fleet as they were immediately poached by Qatar, Emirates and other rich and ambitious airlines. A total of 12 of the 17 Boeing Dreamliner trained staff have left the national carrier while the remaining are mulling leaving. Only one Boeing Certified engineer is left to support the Dreamliner at JKIA.

    With airlines like Qatar Airways so moneyed that they are buying two Boeing 787 Dreamliners every day in CASH, this was bound to happen.

    There are loud rumours within the KQ maintenance crew that the airline cannot afford to provide in-flight entertainment (IFE) in the 737-800s as the vendor who sold the system and provide maintenance services is owed so much money that they now detain any system sent to them for maintenance. KQ knows that it is suppose to provide in flight entertainment on every flight which goes for more than 5 hours. It’s just not able to provide the same.

    Apart from the money owed to the vendors, KQ also owe the taxman, KRA a lot of money that the taxman once detained some equipment over a Ksh 30 million debt which has not been settled.

    In the last 5 years, KQ has lost a total of 75 Engineers and employed 150 (from Nairobi Aviation) new young and inexperienced technicians (calling them engineers) who have never touched an aircraft in real life. KQ has also poached close to 40 Kenya Airforce Servicemen to boost its fleet technicians. Many of the current pilots and engineers claim that they fear for the national carrier as it is playing poker with passengers’ safety.

    Another avenue in which KQ is losing money is the maintenance agreement signed with Royal Thai airline, Qatar Airways, KLM, Aviac Technologies and others. As KQ planes fly to Paris, Bangkok, Amsterdam and other destinations, someone within KQ decided to sign maintenance agreements with other airlines with experienced staff on the ground. The sad bit of this is industrywide, it is not advisable.

    What happens is that the airlines or companies with maintenance agreements with KQ will always ensure that KQ planes are grounded longer for minor and inconsequential defects so that their companies can maximise their earnings. One such instance happened in Amsterdam last Monday when Kenya Airways lost a total of Ksh 47million in one flight because KLM engineers refused to clear the flight for take off over some “valve leak” which was found not to exist. When such a thing happen, KLM engineers would earn $250 per hour per Engineer or $120 per technician. This money is paid directly by KQ to the KLM accounts and is not inclusive of repair and spare parts costs which cost millions of USD. Why would KQ refuse to station own engineer in such locations and loose Ksh 47million in one instance. The practise was common in Paris when Aviac Technologies services was contracted to maintain KQ planes that 90% of the flights were always delayed or cancelled.

    It is not sometimes wrong to give out such contracts but is nonsensical for KQ to give out such contracts when no one is giving them the same.

    When such a thing happens, KQ is bound to pay accommodation for the affected passengers and crew. KQ is also bound to pay other costs like meals, transport and communication. When preparing an expense report, KQ staff would also sneak in some expenses which hard hard to verify like “cost of airtime.”

    Expense sheet prepared by KQ staff for KQ116.

    The time to save KQ is now. The company is flying full planes and making money. The problem is that some executives have intentionally decided to kill the national carrier and launch their own. In the words of one senior executive, “KQ is not making a loss. KQ is just over spending.”

    KQ’s 10 year plan were copied by airlines like Ethiopian Airlines (ET). But you can’t compare ET as it is run in a dictatorial way. You remember the ET pilot who flew a plane to Greece. Many ET crew are monitored and banned from leaving the country the moment they try to seek greener pastures elsewhere. You can’t compare how ET crew lives with how KQ is but ET is still afloat but if they still rely on the KQ plan, it will go down soon.

    As KQ goes down, it is still spending almost Ksh 96 per litre of Jet A-1 fuel while the price has fallen to almost Ksh 45 per litre. KQ is bound to spend this much because it is hedging fuel and bound by the contract until the year 2017.

    Though KQ has even retrenched some “overage pilots”, the fact is that they don’t have money to pay them and told them to wait for 6 months. The problem is that KQ might not be able to last for 6 months.

    As KQ continue to sell properties (sold go downs in Embakassi and planning to sell headquarters) to cover costs, it is not clear how long this will be allowed to go on.