Kenya Insights

Author: Kenya Insights Team

  • Why Kenya Railways Boss Mainga’s Involvement in Joho-Jaffer Defamation Case Came Up in Court

    Why Kenya Railways Boss Mainga’s Involvement in Joho-Jaffer Defamation Case Came Up in Court

    The Managing Director of Kenya Railways Corporation (KRC), Philip Mainga, has found himself unexpectedly mentioned in a high-profile defamation case involving Mombasa businessman Abubakar Ali Joho and his business rival, highlighting the complex web of relationships in Kenya’s port logistics sector.

    The Unexpected Witness

    Mainga’s name surfaced during court proceedings where Matilda Maodo Kinzani, an employee of Bulkstream Ltd, faces charges of publishing false and defamatory information about Abubakar Ali Joho – brother to Cabinet Secretary for Mining and Blue Economy Hassan Joho – and allegedly linking him to a Sh40 billion fraud scheme.

    According to testimony from Police Constable Fredrick Muchiri of the Anti-Terror Police Unit (ATPU), Mainga allegedly informed Abu Joho about the existence of a defamatory document circulating on social media that targeted both him and his prominent brother.

    “The information we received is that it was Mr Mainga who notified Mr Abu of the defamatory document. However, I have not examined his phone to verify the communication,” Muchiri told Mombasa Senior Resident Magistrate David Odhiambo during cross-examination last Friday.

    The Business Rivalry Context

    The defamation case centers on accusations that Abu Joho’s entry into the port logistics business disrupted a three-decade monopoly allegedly held by tycoon Mohamed Jaffer, owner of Bulkstream Ltd (formerly Grainbulk Handlers Limited). This business rivalry forms the backdrop of what Abu Joho describes as a “sustained smear campaign” against his family.

    Abu Joho, who operates Autoport Freight Terminus and Portside Freight Terminal, directly blamed Jaffer for orchestrating the attacks. “He has had a monopoly for 30 years. Now that I have entered the port business, that’s where our troubles began. He is the monopoly; I am not,” he testified.

    The Defamatory Document

    The controversial document allegedly made grave accusations against Abu Joho, including:

    • Involvement in drug trafficking
    • Illegally acquiring Kenya Railways land in Mombasa
    • Helping his brother embezzle Sh40 billion from Mombasa County coffers
    • Personal attacks on his family’s reputation

    The document was allegedly circulated in a WhatsApp group and later spread across social media platforms, prompting Abu Joho to file a formal complaint with the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) in July 2024.

    Forensic Evidence Points to Accused

    Despite Mainga’s alleged role in alerting Abu Joho to the document’s existence, police investigations traced the defamatory content to Kinzani’s electronic devices. Constable Muchiri emphasized that forensic analysis confirmed Kinzani as the author, not Mainga.

    “It is not possible that Mr Mainga authored the letter because forensic analysis traced it to Ms Kinzani’s phone. I reviewed the forensic report, which links the document to the accused,” Muchiri testified.

    Procedural Questions Raised

    The defense, led by lawyer Michael Oloo, raised questions about the investigation’s handling, particularly why an Anti-Terror Police Unit was investigating a cybercrime case rather than the designated cybercrime division. Seven ATPU officers participated in raiding Kinzani’s home and workplace to seize electronic devices for forensic analysis.

    Muchiri defended the unit’s involvement, stating: “We were not investigating Ms Kinzani for terrorism. This publication did not constitute a terrorist threat.”

    Missing Evidence and Administrative Issues

    In a surprising development, Muchiri admitted that his handwritten statement was missing from the court file, with only a typed version containing typographical errors available to both prosecution and defense teams.

    “The statement in the file is typed, but it’s not signed by me. I wrote and submitted it to the investigating officer, but it’s missing. I don’t know why,” he revealed.

    The case highlights the intense competition in Kenya’s lucrative port logistics sector, where established players face disruption from new entrants.

    Abu Joho’s emergence as a significant player in the industry has apparently triggered what he describes as character assassination rather than fair business competition.

    “This is not business competition. It’s character assassination. It has affected me, my business, and my family,” Abu Joho lamented during his testimony.

    The Charges

    Kinzani faces four criminal charges under Section 23 of the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act for allegedly disseminating false and defamatory information online. She has denied all accusations and is currently out on Sh300,000 cash bail.

    What’s Next

    The case continues to unfold with the prosecution seeking to establish the full extent of the alleged defamation campaign.

    While Mainga’s exact role remains unclear – he was not called as a witness despite allegedly being the one who alerted Abu Joho to the document – his mention underscores the interconnected nature of Kenya’s business and government circles.

    The hearing is set to continue on August 8, 2025, with the lead investigator expected to provide more details about the forensic analysis that linked the defamatory document to the accused.

    As this case progresses, it offers a rare glimpse into the high-stakes world of port logistics business, where competition can quickly escalate from boardrooms to courtrooms, dragging in unexpected players from Kenya’s public sector.

  • Omtatah Wins Case For Mohamed Jaffer As Joho Family Suffers Blow In Court Case Against Port Monopoly

    Omtatah Wins Case For Mohamed Jaffer As Joho Family Suffers Blow In Court Case Against Port Monopoly

    Supreme Court quashes Sh5.8 billion grain facility deal, dealing major setback to Cabinet Secretary Hassan Joho’s family business interests at Mombasa Port

    The Supreme Court has delivered a crushing blow to Cabinet Secretary Hassan Joho’s family business empire, nullifying a lucrative Sh5.8 billion grain handling facility deal at Mombasa Port in a landmark ruling that effectively preserves Mohamed Jaffer’s three-decade monopoly in the sector.

    In a significant victory for activist Okiya Omtatah and indirectly for business tycoon Mohamed Jaffer, the apex court ruled that the Kenya Ports Authority (KPA) violated constitutional procurement procedures when it awarded the contract to Portside Freight Terminals Limited, a company linked to the Joho family.

    Constitutional Violation Cited

    A five-judge bench led by Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu declared that KPA’s use of the Specially Permitted Procurement Procedure (SPPP) to award the licence was “inconsistent with the Constitution,” emphasizing that all public projects must follow fair, equitable, transparent, competitive and cost-effective processes.

    “The protection of the supremacy of the Constitution is critical and there can be no greater public or national security interest than upholding the Constitution, its values and principles and obeying the law,” the justices stated in their unanimous decision.

    The court found that KPA had failed to demonstrate “exceptional circumstances” that would justify bypassing competitive tendering, a requirement under Section 114A of the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act.

    Omtatah’s Persistent Legal Challenge

    Senator Okiya Omtatah, who has been challenging the Joho family’s port business dealings since 2022, argued that the procurement process was discriminatory and that other companies were unfairly excluded from consideration. His legal activism has now culminated in this major victory against what he termed an irregular procurement process.

    The Busia Senator’s persistence in demanding transparency began in May 2022 when he sued KPA for refusing to provide copies of licenses issued to Portside Freight Terminals Ltd and Heartland Terminals Ltd. He had argued that the secrecy surrounding the deal violated his constitutional right to access information on matters of significant public interest.

    Business Rivalry and Port Politics

    The Supreme Court ruling has significant implications for the ongoing business rivalry between the Joho family and Mohamed Jaffer, whose company Bulkstream Ltd (formerly Grain Bulk Handlers Limited) has operated the sole bulk grain facility at Mombasa Port for over 30 years.

    The government had argued that the second facility was necessary to end Jaffer’s monopoly and enhance food security through diversification.

    However, the court’s decision effectively maintains the status quo, preserving Jaffer’s dominant position in the grain handling business.

    The rivalry between the two business interests has spilled over into the courts in multiple ways. In ongoing defamation proceedings, Abubakar Ali Joho (Abu), brother to CS Hassan Joho, has accused Jaffer of orchestrating a smear campaign against his family following their entry into the port logistics business.

    “He has had a monopoly for 30 years. Now that I have entered the port business, that’s where our troubles began. He is the monopoly; I am not,” Abu Joho testified in court, directly naming Jaffer as being behind attacks on his family’s reputation.

    Financial and Strategic Implications

    The blocked project, estimated to cost approximately $45 million (Sh5.8 billion), would have seen Portside Freight Terminals construct a second bulk grain handling facility with a common user island berth. The facility was expected to complement the existing capacity of 2.4 million tonnes annually at the port.

    KPA had argued that Portside Freight Terminals offered strategic advantages, including ownership of adjacent land and willingness to build the berth at its own cost. However, these commercial considerations were deemed insufficient to override constitutional procurement requirements.

    Broader Context of Joho Business Empire

    The Supreme Court decision represents the latest setback for the Joho family’s expanding business interests. The family has faced multiple legal challenges across various sectors, from port operations to real estate deals, including a recent Sh9 billion land deal connected to the Talanta Stadium project.

    The ruling also comes amid ongoing defamation cases where the family has been accused of various improprieties, including allegations of defrauding Mombasa County of over Sh40 billion during Hassan Joho’s tenure as governor – claims the family vehemently denies.

    Legal Precedent and Future Implications

    The Supreme Court’s decision sets an important precedent for public procurement, emphasizing that no project, regardless of its perceived strategic importance or urgency, can circumvent constitutional requirements for competitive tendering.

    The court overturned a Court of Appeal ruling that had initially cleared the way for the project, stating that the appellate judges had erred in reversing the High Court’s original decision blocking the deal.

    Legal experts view the ruling as a vindication of constitutional procurement principles and a warning to public entities against misusing alternative procurement methods to avoid competition.

    What’s Next

    With the Supreme Court ruling being final, Portside Freight Terminals Limited will be unable to proceed with the grain facility project under the current arrangement. Any future attempts to establish a second bulk grain handling facility at Mombasa Port will need to follow proper competitive tendering procedures.

    For Mohamed Jaffer’s Bulkstream Ltd, the ruling preserves their exclusive position in grain handling at Kenya’s largest port, maintaining a business arrangement that has lasted over three decades.

    The decision also validates Omtatah’s role as a key figure in ensuring government accountability and transparency in public procurement processes, adding to his reputation as a formidable legal activist willing to challenge powerful business and political interests.

  • Zakhem International Accused of Sh537 Million Fraud, Faces Liquidation

    Zakhem International Accused of Sh537 Million Fraud, Faces Liquidation

    Nairobi — Lebanese construction giant Zakhem International is staring down a potentially devastating liquidation after allegedly failing to pay a Sh537 million debt to a Kenyan subcontractor, Azicon Kenya Limited, despite having received full compensation from the Kenya Pipeline Company (KPC).

    Azicon, which provided electrical, instrumentation, and telecommunication installation services for the Mombasa-Nairobi pipeline upgrade, claims it completed the work in 2018 and received formal certification for payment in March 2019. However, more than six years later, the balance remains unpaid .

    Zakhem had subcontracted Azicon as part of the Sh48 billion pipeline replacement project commissioned by KPC in 2014.

    While Zakhem received full payment from KPC, it only transferred Sh840 million to Azicon, leaving a balance of Sh537.3 million (approximately $4.16 million), which the Kenyan firm says has never been disputed but remains unpaid .

    In a damning ruling, High Court judge Lawrence Mugambi dismissed Zakhem’s attempt to block insolvency proceedings, declaring that the company had failed to comply with a statutory 21-day payment demand served in January 2025.

    “It is, therefore, [Azicon’s] reasonable conclusion that, by failing to comply… Zakhem International is unable to pay its debt and is consequently liable to be liquidated,” Justice Mugambi stated .

    This isn’t the first time Zakhem has faced legal trouble with subcontractors.

    In a separate case last year, another firm, Multiple ICD (Kenya) Ltd, sued for Sh670 million, even obtaining a court order to freeze KPC accounts—an order later lifted when it emerged that KPC no longer held any money for Zakhem .

    Azicon’s Managing Director, David Kibet Tonui, had previously obtained a court order in 2020 compelling Zakhem to pay the outstanding amount, but enforcement has been frustrated by what the firm describes as deliberate non-compliance .

    Court affidavits from both Zakhem and KPC confirm that the Lebanese firm was paid in full and later withdrew its own lawsuit against KPC—evidence, the court found, that the money was indeed received. This leaves Azicon legally cleared to pursue liquidation and asset auction to recover the debt .

    The case lays bare the vulnerability of local firms in high-stakes infrastructure projects often dominated by foreign contractors.

    As the court prepares for final determinations, the fallout could mark a turning point in how Kenya handles foreign firms accused of financial malpractice against local partners.

  • CS Alfred Mutua Embroiled in Custody Battle After A ‘Quick’ Moment With Kenyan Girl in Dubai

    CS Alfred Mutua Embroiled in Custody Battle After A ‘Quick’ Moment With Kenyan Girl in Dubai

    The corridors of power are buzzing with whispers about Labour Cabinet Secretary Alfred Mutua’s latest headache – and this time, it’s not about government policy.

    Word on the street is that the smooth-talking CS, known for his polished public persona, finds himself in hot water over what he describes as a “brief and inconsistent” romantic encounter that has now spiraled into a multi-million shilling legal nightmare.

    Sources close to the matter reveal that Mutua’s troubles began in 2022 during what seemed like an innocent shopping trip to Dubai Mall. What started as casual conversation with a Kenyan woman identified only as FMM has now morphed into a custody battle that threatens to expose the private life of one of Kenya’s most visible government officials.

    The Dubai Connection

    The grapevine suggests that their brief fling – lasting barely a year – resulted in the birth of a daughter in August 2023. But here’s where things get spicy: the woman is now demanding a whopping Sh6 million in backdated child support, painting a picture of a deadbeat father who allegedly vanished when responsibility came knocking.

    “These demands are outrageous and appalling,” Mutua reportedly stated in court documents, clearly rattled by what he terms harassment and extortion attempts.

    But FMM isn’t backing down. Court papers reveal her laundry list of demands that read like a government wish list gone rogue:

    • Foreign residency (preferably US, Canada, Australia, or New Zealand)
    • Government tenders
    • A blank cheque (with a promise not to go “insane” with the amount)
    • Diplomatic postings

    The Instagram Bombshell

    Perhaps the most damaging blow to Mutua’s carefully curated image came when FMM allegedly “outed” him on Instagram as the father of her child. Sources suggest this public revelation has left the CS scrambling to control the narrative, claiming it puts his daughter at unnecessary risk due to his high-profile status.

    The DNA test, conducted in December 2023 and confirmed just last month, proved what many already suspected – Mutua is indeed the biological father. Yet insiders claim he’s been dragging his feet on assuming responsibility, leading to the current legal standoff.

    The Million-Shilling Breakdown

    FMM’s expense sheet reads like a luxury lifestyle manual:

    • Sh3.6 million for rent alone
    • Sh564,000 for food and toiletries
    • Sh69,800 for a three-night birthday party at Dubai’s Grand Hyatt
    • Additional costs for domestic help, utilities, clothing, and even car insurance

    Political observers note the irony: a man who preaches good governance and accountability is now fighting accusations of dodging his own parental responsibilities.

    The WhatsApp Trail

    Perhaps most damaging are the alleged WhatsApp exchanges that have found their way into court documents. One particularly telling message from FMM reportedly reads: “Hi Alfred… I wanted to refresh your memory that you didn’t use a condom on me. You’ve stated multiple times that I impregnated myself.”

    Another message allegedly shows her frustration: “I am left with zero options… No job. I’m in Kenya with my child. You have refused any obligations.”

    What’s Next?

    As the case heads to Milimani Children’s Court, Mutua is pushing for a 50:50 parenting arrangement while maintaining his innocence against extortion claims. He insists he’s willing to support his daughter within legal bounds but draws the line at what he terms “outrageous demands.”

    FMM, on her part, is seeking full custody and official recognition of Mutua as the biological father, claiming she’s shouldered all responsibilities alone since the child’s birth.

    The Stakes

    For a man whose political career has been built on projecting competence and moral authority, this custody battle couldn’t come at a worse time. With President Ruto’s administration under scrutiny over various issues, the last thing the government needs is a Cabinet Secretary embroiled in a messy personal scandal.

    As one political insider quipped: “When you’re busy trying to fix the country’s labor issues, the last thing you need is your own domestic affairs making headlines.”

    The case continues, and if these court documents are anything to go by, Kenyans are in for more revelations about their usually private Cabinet Secretary’s not-so-private affairs.

    Watch this space – the grapevine rarely gets it wrong, and this story has all the ingredients of a political soap opera that’s just getting started.

  • Humphrey Kariuki: The Kenyan Billionaire Who Lost State Privileges After Alleged Multibillion Tax Evasion

    Humphrey Kariuki: The Kenyan Billionaire Who Lost State Privileges After Alleged Multibillion Tax Evasion

    In the corridors of power in Kenya, few names have oscillated between privilege and peril as dramatically as Humphrey Kariuki Ndegwa.

    The billionaire businessman, once a regular host to presidents and cabinet ministers at his luxury Mt. Kenya Safari Club, has witnessed his empire crumble under the weight of a protracted battle with Kenya’s tax authorities—a fight that cost him billions and nearly destroyed his reputation.

    Today, as his flagship liquor company Africa Spirits Limited (ASL) enters administration, Kariuki’s story serves as a cautionary tale about the intersection of wealth, politics, and tax compliance in Kenya’s evolving business landscape.

    The Rise of a Business Empire

    Humphrey Kariuki.
    Humphrey Kariuki.

    Humphrey Kariuki’s journey from a Central Bank of Kenya employee to one of East Africa’s most influential businessmen reads like a modern African success story.

    The founder of Janus Continental Group brought together several companies in the petroleum, energy, hospitality and real estate sectors, employing over 700 people in more than 10 countries across East, Central and Southern Africa, and the United Arab Emirates.

    His crown jewel, the Mt. Kenya Safari Club in Nanyuki, has hosted illustrious guests including former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill and American singer Bing Crosby.

    The 4.5-star establishment, spanning over 100 acres, became synonymous with power and prestige in Kenya’s political circles.

    The Sh41 Billion Tax Bombshell

    Everything changed on January 2019 when the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) conducted a dramatic raid on Africa Spirits Limited’s Thika-based factory.

    The taxman accused the company of large-scale tax evasion through the use of fake excise stamps and failure to declare the full volume of alcohol produced and sold.

    By August 19, 2019, the Directorate of Criminal Investigations had seized Kariuki himself, driving him to their Kiambu Road headquarters in what became one of Kenya’s most high-profile tax evasion cases.

    The businessman was ordered to deposit Sh11 million cash bail to secure his freedom, facing accusations of evading Sh41 billion in taxes.

    The charges were severe: tax fraud, possession of counterfeit excise stamps, and being in possession of uncustomed goods. ASL’s factory, which produced popular brands including Bluemoon vodka, Legend Brandy, Furaha Vodka, and Gypsy King Gin, was shuttered, effectively crippling Kariuki’s liquor empire.

    Political Crossfire and Strategic Gambles

    Sources close to the matter suggest that Kariuki’s troubles were partly political.

    During President Uhuru Kenyatta’s administration, the businessman had reportedly found himself on the wrong side of power dynamics due to his alleged support for then-Deputy President William Ruto ahead of the 2022 general elections.

    In a risky political gamble, Kariuki chose to align himself with Ruto’s presidential ambitions while Kenyatta’s administration intensified its crackdown on tax evaders.

    The decision would prove both costly and ultimately rewarding, but not before years of legal battles and financial hemorrhaging.

    In 2020, Kariuki briefly fled the country before returning to face the charges.

    His legal team consistently argued that the accusations were politically motivated and based on flawed audits, though court proceedings continued intermittently with the company unable to resume full operations.

    The Ruto Dividend

    Kariuki’s strategic patience paid off when William Ruto won the presidency in August 2022.

    Among Ruto’s first acts was ordering KRA to release the Thika-based distillery back to Kariuki in December 2022.

    The handover took place just days after newly elected President William Ruto appointed Mr Kariuki and 11 other private sector leaders as members of the National Investment Council—a body that advises the government and its agencies on ways to increase investment and economic growth.

    The symbolism was unmistakable.

    In January 2023, President Ruto, Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua, and the entire cabinet held their retreat at Kariuki’s Mt. Kenya Safari Club—the same venue that had hosted similar retreats during Kenyatta’s first term when Kariuki was in the government’s good books.

    The acquittal came in December 2022 when a Nairobi court cleared the billionaire in a case where he was charged with possession of 80 drums of uncustomed ethanol worth Sh7.4 million.

    It seemed Kariuki’s costly gamble had finally paid off.

    The Ownership Controversy

    However, recent investigations have raised questions about media narratives surrounding Kariuki’s connection to Africa Spirits Limited.

    A detailed examination of corporate records by Soko Directory (which we can’t independently confirm) revealed a startling claim: Humphrey Kariuki does not actually own Africa Spirits Limited and never has.

    According to their investigation, Kariuki’s name does not appear in the CR12—the official document listing shareholders and directors.

    ASL reportedly has nine directors, none of whom is Humphrey Kariuki.

    The investigation found no evidence of share ownership, board positions, or executive authority within the company.

    This revelation, if accurate, suggests that years of media coverage linking Kariuki directly to ASL may have been based on assumptions rather than corporate reality.

    The persistence of this narrative raises questions about the accuracy of business reporting in Kenya’s media landscape.

    The Final Collapse

    Despite the political rehabilitation, ASL’s financial troubles proved insurmountable.

    The liquor company has been placed under administration by its directors, nearly six years after the KRA raid crippled operations at its Thika factory.

    The directors appointed Peter Kahi of PKF Consulting Limited as administrator.

    The administration notice, published on June 20, 2025, grants Kahi full control over the company’s assets and operations.

    All powers of directors, shareholders, and staff in handling the firm’s finances have ceased unless explicitly authorized by the administrator.

    Creditors have until July 18, 2025, to submit claims against the company.

    Sources suggest the liquor business is unlikely to reopen.

    “The company has remained shut for a long time and reopening it is an unlikely option because of the mega resources it would require to do so,” an official said.

    Peter Kahi, who has overseen the administration of high-profile corporate collapses including Nakumatt Supermarkets and Mumias Sugar Company, faces the challenging task of assessing ASL’s financial position and potentially restructuring the business to avoid liquidation.

    Legacy of a Cautionary Tale

    Humphrey Kariuki’s story illustrates the volatile relationship between wealth, politics, and regulatory compliance in Kenya.

    His ability to weather the storm through strategic political positioning demonstrates the enduring influence of personal relationships in Kenya’s business environment.

    However, the ultimate collapse of ASL, regardless of ownership structure, highlights the devastating long-term impact of regulatory disputes on business operations.

    The six-year closure of the Thika factory, combined with ongoing legal uncertainties, created insurmountable operational and financial challenges.

    As ASL enters administration, questions remain about the future of Kariuki’s broader business empire.

    While his hospitality and energy interests continue to operate, the liquor company’s collapse serves as a reminder that even the most well-connected businessmen are not immune to the consequences of regulatory non-compliance.

    For Kenya’s business community, Kariuki’s journey from kingmaker to outcast and back to presidential advisor—only to see his flagship company collapse—offers sobering lessons about the risks of operating in the gray areas between business and politics.

    The final chapter of the Africa Spirits Limited saga now rests in the hands of administrators and creditors.

    Whether any value can be salvaged from the ruins of what was once one of Kenya’s prominent liquor companies remains to be seen.

    What is certain is that Humphrey Kariuki’s reputation as an untouchable business mogul has been forever altered by this protracted battle with Kenya’s tax authorities.

    As investigations continue and legal proceedings unfold, the Kariuki case stands as a landmark example of how quickly fortunes can change in Kenya’s high-stakes business environment, where political connections, while valuable, cannot always shield enterprises from the consequences of regulatory disputes.

  • Inside the Kibaki Estate Dispute: Power, Bloodlines & the Unfolding Legal Drama

    Inside the Kibaki Estate Dispute: Power, Bloodlines & the Unfolding Legal Drama

    More than a decade after President Mwai Kibaki stepped down from power, a different kind of battle is now underway—not in Parliament, but in Kenya’s Family Division of the High Court.

    At the center of this dispute is his estate—and the people who claim a rightful share of it.

    This isn’t just a fight over property; it’s a case that speaks to deeper questions of succession, family recognition, and the role of justice in the aftermath of legacy.

    The Core of the Controversy

    Kibaki passed away in April 2022.

    In a will dated 2016, he named his four acknowledged children—Judith Wanjiku, Jimmy Kibaki, David Kagai, and Anthony Githinji—as the sole beneficiaries and executors of a family holding company meant to administer his estate.

    But two individuals have stepped forward, threatening to upend that arrangement.

    Jacob Ocholla Mwai and a woman identified only as JNL have each filed legal claims asserting that they, too, are Kibaki’s biological children.

    They argue that the will is incomplete, potentially forged, and that the declared estate undervalues or omits significant assets, including shareholdings in various companies.

    The Key Witnesses: Who Holds the Truth?

    As hearings prepare to resume in June 2026, several potential witnesses have emerged as pivotal to the court’s final decision:

    1. Mary Wambui – The Quiet Insider

    Rumored for years to have been Kibaki’s second wife under customary law, Mary Wambui may be called to testify.

    Petitioners believe she holds key knowledge about Kibaki’s private life, health, and possibly undisclosed wealth.

    If she confirms a customary marriage or supports claims about omitted beneficiaries, her testimony could shift the legal ground.

    2. Jacob Ocholla – The Eldest Son?

    In his 60s, Ocholla alleges he is Kibaki’s firstborn, pointing to cryptic language—“remoter issue”—in the will as indirect acknowledgment.

    He has gone so far as to request exhumation for DNA testing, a controversial move the Kibaki family firmly opposes.

    His insistence and legal resolve are expected to become focal points of the proceedings.

    3. JNL – The Hidden Daughter

    Also in her 60s, JNL claims to be another unrecognized biological child of the former president. She argues that Kibaki’s estate was deliberately undervalued and that his 2016 will may have been forged.

    Her team has introduced a contested forensic document—one that the Kibaki family has publicly refuted. (? See press report denying the validity of the alleged forgery.)

    4. The Kibaki Children – Defenders of the Will

    Kibaki’s four recognized children have stayed largely out of the limelight, but in court, they are united.

    They maintain that the will is valid, the estate properly declared, and that the DNA claims are speculative, unsupported by credible science.

    To them, the idea of exhumation is not only unproven—it’s deeply disrespectful.

    5. Forensic Experts – The Technicians of Truth

    At the center of the dispute over the will lies a forensic question: Was the signature genuine or falsified? Petitioners have introduced a private analysis questioning its validity—but the Kibaki estate has challenged its authenticity

    A certified forensic examiner will likely be critical in confirming or debunking these allegations.

    Behind the Curtains: Hidden Files and High Stakes

    The Kibaki court file is currently locked away in the High Court vault—a sign of the sensitivity and stature of the case.

    Still, we can reasonably assume the former president’s legal team undertook extensive checks and documentation.

    If the petitioners’ claims are to succeed, they must overcome this well-organized legal defense and produce compelling proof of both kinship and fraud.

    What Does This Case Tell Us?

    At its core, this case is about more than inheritance. It touches on:

    The recognition of children born outside formal marriage.

    How powerful families manage legacies and control wealth.

    The ability of Kenya’s succession laws to accommodate contested realities.

    Even a statesman like Kibaki—surrounded by protocol, legal advisors, and national visibility—has left behind questions only the courts can now settle.

    What Lies Ahead?

    The court is poised to hear explosive testimony, expert opinions, and possibly new revelations.

    Will Ocholla and JNL prove biological ties to the late president? Could the estate’s structure be overturned? Might the will itself be deemed invalid?

    One thing is certain: in succession law, bloodlines, signatures, and silence all speak volumes.

    Stay with us for continuing coverage as this landmark case unfolds—offering a rare glimpse into the private battles of public figures, and the enduring quest for truth after power.

  • Company Director Released on Sh5 Million Bail in Massive Fraud Case

    Company Director Released on Sh5 Million Bail in Massive Fraud Case

    Nairobi, Kenya – A Nairobi-based company director accused of defrauding his own firm of over Sh356 million has been granted bail following a court appearance that highlighted one of the largest corporate theft cases in recent months.

    Honey Khatwani, a director at OKI General Trading Limited, walked free on Tuesday after Principal Magistrate Dolphina Alego at Milimani Law Courts set his bail at Sh5 million cash or an alternative bond of Sh10 million with two Kenyan contact persons.

    The case centers on allegations that Khatwani stole USD 2,786,806.05 (approximately Sh356,711,174.40) from his own company between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2024.

    The alleged theft occurred at Barbado within Nairobi County, according to court documents.

    The court imposed stringent conditions on Khatwani’s release, requiring him to surrender all travel documents, including his passport, to prevent potential flight from the country.

    The magistrate’s decision came after the prosecution expressed concerns about the significant amount involved and Khatwani’s possession of travel documents.

    “Given the magnitude of the alleged fraud, appropriate restrictions are necessary,” the prosecution argued during the bail hearing on Monday, though they did not oppose his release outright.

    Khatwani’s legal team, led by lawyer Kennedy Echesa, mounted a vigorous defense for favorable bail terms, emphasizing their client’s presumption of innocence and ties to the community.

    “The accused is innocent until proven otherwise, and we urge the court to consider this while determining the bond terms,” Echesa told the court.

    The defense highlighted that Khatwani operates businesses employing over 50 people and has strong family ties in Kenya.

    The defense also noted that Khatwani had previously been released on Sh200,000 cash bail upon his initial arrest and requested the court maintain similar terms.

    During the proceedings, Khatwani’s legal team informed the court that their client was unwell and requested permission for him to receive medical attention at Avenue Hospital, adding another dimension to the case.

    Khatwani faces charges of stealing by a director contrary to Section 282 of the Penal Code.

    The prosecution alleges that the substantial sum came into his possession by virtue of his position as a company director at OKI General Trading Limited.

    The accused has pleaded not guilty to all charges.

    This case underscores ongoing concerns about corporate governance and internal controls within Kenyan businesses.

    The allegations suggest a prolonged period of alleged misconduct spanning over four years, raising questions about oversight mechanisms within the company.

    The matter is expected to proceed to full trial, where the prosecution will need to prove beyond reasonable doubt that Khatwani misappropriated the funds entrusted to him in his directorial capacity.

  • From Billionaire to Broke: The Fall of Humphrey Kariuki’s Empire

    From Billionaire to Broke: The Fall of Humphrey Kariuki’s Empire

    Once Kenya’s Most Controversial Tycoon Now Faces Financial Ruin as Flagship Company Enters Administration

    NAIROBI, Kenya – In a dramatic fall from grace that mirrors the country’s ongoing crackdown on tax evasion, billionaire businessman Humphrey Kariuki’s once-mighty business empire appears to be crumbling, with his flagship alcoholic beverages company now under administration and facing potential liquidation.

    Africa Spirits Limited, the Thika-based distillery that was once one of Kenya’s largest local alcohol producers, was officially placed under administration on June 17, 2025, marking what could be the final chapter in Kariuki’s tumultuous six-year battle with tax authorities.

    Peter Kahi of PKF Consulting (K) Limited has been appointed as administrator, effectively stripping Kariuki and his directors of all powers over the company’s assets and operations.

    The appointment comes with a stark warning: “None of the directors, shareholders, employees or any other person is authorised to transact any business on behalf of the Company without express written consent from the Administrator.”

    The Beginning of the End

    The downfall began in January 2019 when the Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) conducted a dramatic raid on Africa Spirits’ Thika factory, accusing the company of large-scale tax evasion through fake excise stamps and failure to declare the full volume of alcohol produced.

    The taxman claimed Africa Spirits had denied the government over Sh41 billion in taxes – a staggering sum that would haunt Kariuki for years.

    The raid led to the seizure of goods and machinery worth billions of shillings, with investigators discovering an estimated 21 million counterfeit excise stamps and 312,000 litres of illicit products.

    Kariuki, along with several company officials, was charged with tax fraud, possession of counterfeit excise stamps, and being in possession of uncustomed goods.

    A Brief Reprieve

    There was momentary hope in December 2022 when KRA handed the factory back to Kariuki, just days after newly elected President William Ruto appointed him to the National Investment Council.

    The timing raised eyebrows, with critics questioning whether political connections had influenced the decision.

    However, sources told the Nation that reopening the liquor business was “an unlikely option because of the mega resources it would require to do so.”

    The company had remained shuttered for nearly four years, with its production lines gathering dust while legal battles raged in the courts.

    The Empire Under Siege

    Once estimated to be worth between $700 million to $1 billion, Kariuki built his empire quietly over four decades, spanning power generation, hospitality, and real estate.

    His business interests include Dalbit Petroleum, Great Lakes Africa Energy, luxury hospitality assets such as The Hub Karen, and the Mt. Kenya Wildlife Conservancy.

    The Hub Karen alone, co-developed in 2016, was valued at KSh 4 billion and features anchor tenants like Carrefour and Java House, serving as a key commercial hub in Nairobi’s affluent Karen suburb.

    But the tax troubles have cast a shadow over his entire business portfolio.

    Despite his high profile and philanthropic activities, Kariuki’s empire has been repeatedly dogged by scrutiny from tax authorities and anti-corruption agencies, with his KRA troubles serving as a flashpoint in Kenya’s broader crackdown on tax cheats.

    The Administration Gambit

    With Africa Spirits now under administration, Kahi’s mandate will be to assess the financial position of the company, negotiate with creditors, and potentially restructure the business to avoid liquidation.

    Kahi has a reputation for handling high-profile corporate collapses, having previously overseen the administration of Nakumatt Supermarkets and Mumias Sugar Company.

    Creditors have been instructed to submit any claims by July 18, 2025, though it remains unclear whether the firm can survive given the magnitude of its legal and tax liabilities.

    The brands that once rolled off Africa Spirits’ production lines – including Bluemoon vodka, Legend Brandy, Furaha Vodka, and Gypsy King Gin – may never see the light of day again.

    A Cautionary Tale

    In 2020, Kariuki briefly fled the country before returning to face charges, with his legal team arguing that the accusations were politically motivated and based on flawed audits.

    However, court proceedings have continued intermittently, with the company unable to resume full operations.

    The billionaire’s fall from grace serves as a stark reminder of Kenya’s evolving business landscape, where tax compliance has become non-negotiable regardless of one’s wealth or political connections.

    What was once a business empire built over decades now hangs in the balance, with creditors circling and liquidation a real possibility.

    As the public and stakeholders have been asked to direct all communications to the administrator’s office, the future of Africa Spirits Limited – and whether it can rise from the ashes of legal battles and financial collapse – remains uncertain.

    For Humphrey Kariuki, the man who once moved in the shadows building a billion-dollar empire, the spotlight now shines harshly on what may be the final act of his business career.

  • Inside Police Plans To Contain June 25 Protests

    Inside Police Plans To Contain June 25 Protests

    Security commanders finalize comprehensive strategy as Kenya braces for mass demonstrations over Albert Ojwang’s death in custody

    Kenyan police have finalized an extensive security strategy to manage the planned June 25 protests, deploying hundreds of officers across Nairobi’s Central Business District as the country braces for what could be the largest demonstrations since last year’s deadly anti-tax protests.

    Top police commanders concluded a series of high-level strategy meetings on Thursday, submitting a comprehensive security plan to the National Security Council in a session attended by President William Ruto.

    The plan outlines how police intend to manage the protests and maintain order, particularly in the capital city, as tensions continue to escalate following the death of blogger and teacher Albert Ojwang in police custody.

    Strategic Command Structure

    Inspector General of Police Douglas Kanja is leading the preparations, coordinating with senior commanders including Directorate of Criminal Investigations Director Mohammed Amin, Deputy Inspector General Gilbert Masengeli, and acting DIG Patrick Tito.

    The planning process began with initial discussions on Tuesday at the National Police Service headquarters at Jogoo House, followed by a second meeting on Wednesday where a harmonized operational strategy was drafted.

    “Yes, we are on top of things. Today we met with all commanders for a review of the strategic security plan,” Kanja told reporters on Thursday evening.

    “The police will follow all established procedures and I urge protestors to be peaceful and to follow police guidelines.”

    The Inspector General issued a stern warning to potential troublemakers: “Anybody (goons) thinking of infiltrating the peaceful demonstrations should be warned. They will spend a long time in jail.”

    Deployment Strategy

    The security plan involves a multi-tiered approach with hundreds of officers from various formations being deployed beginning Wednesday, June 25. Officers from the General Service Unit (GSU), Rapid Deployment Unit (RDU), and regular police units will monitor the situation across key areas of Nairobi.

    Ground forces on foot patrol will be backed by colleagues in patrol cars and trucks, allowing for rapid response to any disturbances.

    The GSU and Administration Police officers have been specifically tasked with breaking up demonstrations that become unruly, while a separate team from Nairobi Central Police Station has been designated to provide security for peaceful demonstrators.

    Tactical Resources and Equipment

    Police have positioned water cannons at strategic locations throughout the city as backup measures in case of escalation.

    Roads earmarked for closure during the protest period include access routes to sensitive areas such as Parliament Road, State House Road, and other government buildings deemed high-security zones.

    Depending on how the situation develops, police may also deploy mounted officers and dog units to reinforce their ground presence.

    This comprehensive approach marks a significant departure from the June 2024 protests, where police were reportedly caught off guard.

    Intelligence Operations

    NIS Director General Noordin Haji.

    Unlike previous demonstrations, police commanders at the station level have been instructed to gather intelligence in advance.

    Officers from the National Intelligence Service (NIS) have been tasked with identifying protest organizers and financiers, according to senior security sources.

    To ensure seamless coordination during the protests, senior police officers will be stationed at the Police Command Centre at Jogoo House, where they will monitor developments in real-time and provide operational guidance to teams on the ground.

    Background to the Protests

    The upcoming demonstrations stem from public outrage over the death of 31-year-old Albert Ojwang, a teacher and blogger who died while in police custody earlier this month.

    Ojwang was arrested on June 6 in Homa Bay County on charges of “defaming” Deputy Inspector General Eliud Lagat, after publishing posts exposing alleged high-level corruption in the police force.

    The blogger was transferred over 350 kilometers from his hometown to Nairobi Central Police Station, where he died under circumstances that have sparked widespread condemnation.

    An autopsy revealed that Ojwang’s injuries were not self-inflicted, contradicting initial police claims.

    President William Ruto condemned Ojwang’s death as “heartbreaking and unacceptable,” while the European Union, United States, and United Kingdom have all called for a transparent investigation.

    The incident has reignited memories of last year’s anti-tax protests, where at least 60 people were killed during a security force crackdown, including a 12-year-old boy who was shot in the back.

    Recent Escalation

    Protests have already erupted across Nairobi this week, with demonstrations concentrated around Nation Centre, Moi Avenue, and Kenyatta Avenue in the CBD. Police have deployed tear gas against crowds, and several incidents have drawn international attention, including the close-range shooting of an unarmed protester on Tuesday.

    The situation further escalated when Deputy Inspector General Lagat announced he was stepping aside to allow investigations into Ojwang’s death, just hours before Monday’s high-level security meeting at State House between Kanja and Interior Cabinet Secretary Kipchumba Murkomen.

    Police Assurances

    Despite the heavy security preparations, police officials have emphasized their commitment to facilitating peaceful protests.

    National Police Service spokesperson Michael Muchiri confirmed that multiple strategy meetings were underway to ensure full preparedness.

    “It is meeting after meeting now. We want to be well prepared and we will offer security,” Muchiri stated.

    Nairobi Regional Police Commander George Seda assured residents that sufficient security measures had been implemented.

    “We will provide enough security for protesters and for all other Kenyans,” Seda said during a press briefing at his office on Wednesday.

    Historical Context

    The June 25 date holds particular significance, as it marks exactly one year since thousands of protesters stormed Parliament during last year’s anti-tax demonstrations.

    That day saw unprecedented scenes of civil unrest, with protesters breaking into the legislature building while police opened fire, resulting in multiple casualties.

    The anniversary timing has added symbolic weight to the upcoming protests, with some activists describing June 25 as “like a second Independence Day” for Kenya’s youth-led protest movement.

    As Kenya prepares for what could be a defining moment in its recent political history, the comprehensive police strategy reflects lessons learned from previous demonstrations.

    However, the success of these plans will largely depend on maintaining the delicate balance between ensuring public order and respecting citizens’ constitutional right to peaceful assembly.

    The protests are expected to last several days, with organizers calling for sustained demonstrations until their demands for accountability and justice are met.

    The coming week will test both the police’s new approach to crowd control and the resilience of Kenya’s democratic institutions under pressure.

    For the latest updates on the June 25 protests and security developments, follow our continuing coverage.

  • Kenya Railways MD Philip Mainga: A Wanted Man Now On Activists’ Radar Facing Multiple Corruption Probes

    Kenya Railways MD Philip Mainga: A Wanted Man Now On Activists’ Radar Facing Multiple Corruption Probes

    Court activists demand comprehensive investigation into alleged financial mismanagement, land grabbing, and procurement irregularities

    Philip Mainga, the embattled Managing Director of Kenya Railways Corporation (KRC), finds himself at the center of mounting legal challenges as activists petition the High Court to compel anti-corruption agencies to launch comprehensive investigations into his conduct.

    Two prominent activists, Timothy Rasugu and Julius Chebitok, have moved to court seeking orders compelling the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) and the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) to undertake thorough investigations into all financial transactions conducted during Mainga’s tenure at the helm of the state corporation.

    High Court Judge Lawrence Mugambi has directed the duo to serve Mainga with court documents as the case gains momentum.

    The activists’ petition paints a damning picture of alleged systematic corruption and financial mismanagement that has plagued Kenya Railways under Mainga’s leadership.

    Central to their case is the allegation that Mainga orchestrated a series of irregular procurement deals and questionable leasing arrangements, leading to massive financial losses.

    The most significant of these involves a Sh150 million tender for Murram supply in the Nairobi-Nanyuki railway rehabilitation project (Tender No. KR/SCM/FRC/003/2019-2020), which allegedly violated public procurement regulations through restricted bidding, bypassing the Sh30 million threshold set by regulations.

    Further investigation reveals that contracts worth Sh88.2 million to First Choice General Suppliers Limited and Sh34.5 million each to Mosrach Limited were backdated, with work commencing before formal agreements were signed.

    Adding to the complexity, recent reports indicate that the Sh88.2 million deal was allegedly given to a business controlled by Mainga’s long-term fiancée in what investigators describe as an improper process.

    Beyond procurement irregularities, Mainga faces serious allegations of land grabbing and illegal property dealings.

    The activists claim he has been involved in converting public land to private property, specifically alleging that he was involved in land grabbing at Kileleshwa, converting land belonging to the Corporation and building a private hotel.

    The petition further alleges that “The Respondent has also bought public land valued in millions of Kenya shillings in prime Machakos town and build Chocolate City hotel and Chocolate City Supermarket.”

    The activists want the National Land Commission to establish the ownership of land where Chocolate City bar, restaurant and supermarket sits, and determine whether the land was acquired lawfully.

    Under Mainga’s leadership, over 544 parcels of public land have allegedly been illegally allocated to private individuals, with senators demanding EACC arrest Mainga over alleged illegal property deals.

    Financial Hemorrhaging

    Perhaps most damaging to Mainga’s reputation is Kenya Railways’ catastrophic financial performance under his watch.

    Kenya Railways Corporation slumped into a Sh50.37 billion deficit in the financial year that ended June 2024, topping the list of State agencies whose operational costs outstripped revenues.

    This staggering loss has made Kenya Railways the worst-performing state corporation, dwarfing losses of other state entities including the National Health Insurance Fund (Sh3.4 billion), New Kenya Cooperative Creameries (Sh2.4 billion), and Nzoia Sugar (Sh1.1 billion).

    The financial crisis deepened following Kenya Railways’ default on a Sh3.5 billion loan, with the debt ballooning to Sh14 billion, including repayments and accrued charges.

    The SGR on-lent loan hit Sh737.5 billion in June, up from the Sh539 billion originally borrowed from the China Exim Bank.

    Procurement Scandals and Conflict of Interest

    The activists’ court filing highlights multiple procurement irregularities, including a controversial tender for general office stationery supply (Tender number KR/SCM/FRC/003/2023-2024).

    Internal sources allege irregular award of the tender to proxy companies associated with senior management at the state corporation, with an estimated Sh200 million potentially lost to beneficiaries.

    The petition accuses Kenya Railways of disregarding compliance with the Public Procurement and Asset Disposal Act, 2015, particularly Section 62 regarding “Declaration not to engage in corruption.”

    Leasing Irregularities

    Among the most significant allegations is Mainga’s involvement in illegal land leasing scandals.

    He is accused of leasing Makongeni Container Yards in Nairobi for 10 years without board approval, leading to over Sh400 million in lost revenue.

    Aside from procurement woes, Mainga is accused of overseeing what is now Kenya’s most financially crippled state corporation.

    KRC posted a staggering KSh 50.4 billion net loss this year—dwarfing losses posted by institutions like the NHIF, New KCC, and Nzoia Sugar.

    Despite government directives to slash spending on non-core activities, Kenya Railways failed to align with fiscal reforms.

    Matters worsened when an Auditor General’s report tabled in Parliament revealed that KRC defaulted on a KSh 3.5 billion loan, which has since ballooned to KSh 14 billion due to interest and penalties.

    In response to these allegations, High Court Judge Lawrence Mugambi has directed the petitioners to serve Mainga with all relevant court documents.

    The activists are also urging the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (PPRA) to conduct a special audit into all procurement processes during Mainga’s tenure and have asked the court to order restitution for all lost public funds.

    Mainga’s term as Kenya Railways MD officially ended in February 2023, yet the Public Service Commission launched a probe into the secret extension of his term, raising questions about the legitimacy of his continued tenure.

    Additional allegations include appointing Benedict Kiema Kavua to a plum position after allegedly taking bribes in a sham recruitment exercise, further demonstrating the breadth of corruption allegations surrounding his leadership.

    What the Activists Seek

    The petitioners are seeking comprehensive relief from the court, including:

    – Orders compelling EACC and DCI to investigate all financial transactions during Mainga’s tenure
    – Direction for National Land Commission to establish ownership of disputed properties
    – Special audit by Public Procurement Regulatory Authority of all procurement processes
    – Restitution and recovery of all public funds lost through fraudulent deals
    – Implementation of governance and structural reforms within Kenya Railways

    The case against Mainga represents more than individual corruption allegations; it highlights systemic governance failures within Kenya’s state corporations.

    Despite government directives to cut costs on non-core activities such as travel, training, and overtime, KR reportedly failed to align its budget with the Kenya Kwanza administration’s fiscal priorities.

    As Kenya grapples with mounting public debt and calls for accountability in public service, the Mainga case has become a test of the country’s commitment to fighting corruption in state corporations.

    The outcome of these legal proceedings could set important precedents for how corruption cases involving senior public officials are handled.

    The High Court is expected to hear the matter in the coming weeks, with all eyes on whether the anti-corruption agencies will be compelled to take decisive action against one of Kenya’s most controversial state corporation chiefs.

  • The Deputy’s Silent Celebration: Inside Nairobi’s Political Power Play

    The Deputy’s Silent Celebration: Inside Nairobi’s Political Power Play

    Whispers of ambition echo through City Hall as Deputy Governor Njoroge Muchiri reportedly eyes the top seat amid his boss’s mounting troubles

    Behind the mahogany doors of Nairobi’s City Hall, a political drama worthy of Shakespeare is quietly unfolding.

    While Governor Johnson Sakaja battles a storm of controversies that threaten to sink his administration, his deputy, Njoroge Muchiri, may be silently preparing for an opportunistic ascension to power.

    The Goons Scandal That Started It All

    The latest chapter in Sakaja’s troubled tenure began with explosive allegations that he financed goons to disrupt peaceful protests during the Justice for Ojwang demonstrations.

    The protests, organized to demand accountability for the death of blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody, descended into chaos when alleged county-sponsored thugs clashed with demonstrators and police.

    The optics couldn’t be worse for a governor already struggling with public perception.

    But inside Muchiri’s office, sources whisper of a different mood entirely—one of barely concealed anticipation.

    “There’s a silent celebration happening,” reveals an insider who spoke on condition of anonymity. “They see Sakaja’s missteps as stepping stones to the top office.”

    A Pattern of PR Disasters

    Johnson Sakaja.
    Johnson Sakaja.

    Sakaja’s administration has become synonymous with what critics call “governance by press release”—grand announcements followed by spectacular failures or legal entanglements. The pattern has become so predictable that Nairobians have coined a phrase: “Inawork” (it’s working), sarcastically referencing the governor’s favorite catchphrase.

    The litany of failed promises reads like a catalog of urban governance gone wrong:

    The Flood Cycle: Every rainy season brings the same theatrical response—Sakaja’s team distributing blankets and food to flood victims while ignoring the crumbling drainage infrastructure that causes the disasters. Meanwhile, they continue approving construction projects that overwhelm an already strained sewerage system.

    The Fire Brigade Theater: When blazes consume markets like Gikomba—East Africa’s largest second-hand clothing hub—the county’s response follows a script: emergency visits, promises of fire stations and perimeter walls, then silence until the next tragedy. The Auditor General’s reports gather dust as the promised infrastructure remains a mirage.

    The Rate Enforcement Fiasco: Perhaps most damaging to Sakaja’s credibility has been the county’s aggressive—and often illegal—crackdown on alleged rate defaulters. The exercise, meant to demonstrate fiscal responsibility, has instead exposed administrative incompetence and legal recklessness.

    Legal Quagmire Deepens

    The rate collection blunder has spawned multiple court cases that paint a picture of an administration either willfully ignorant or deliberately destructive. Two recent cases illuminate the chaos:

    The Masonic Trustees found their Nyerere Road property vandalized by county enforcement officers despite holding a valid exemption from rate payments dating back to 1990. “We were shocked and dismayed,” their court filing states, describing how officers demolished their gate and slapped a Sh19 million demand notice on property they knew was exempt.

    Chester House faced similar treatment, with the county claiming arrears of Sh122.5 million despite the building having no connection to the listed land parcels. The case highlights what appears to be a systematic failure in the county’s record-keeping and enforcement procedures.

    The Kenya Power Spectacle

    The nadir of Sakaja’s PR disasters came with the Kenya Power confrontation, where county officers dumped waste outside KPLC offices and disrupted essential services at Stima Plaza. The stunt backfired spectacularly when it emerged that Kenya Power wasn’t even the building’s owner—a fact easily verifiable through public records.

    The incident forced an embarrassing climbdown and a public apology, but not before exposing the administration’s preference for theatrics over due process.

    Muchiri’s Calculated Silence

    While Sakaja stumbles from crisis to crisis, Deputy Governor Muchiri has maintained a strategic low profile. Those close to his office describe a careful calculation: every Sakaja misstep potentially brings Muchiri closer to the governor’s seat.

    “They’re not just watching—they’re positioning,” says a City Hall observer who has witnessed similar power plays in previous administrations. “The deputy knows that public pressure, legal troubles, and political isolation could create the perfect storm for succession.”

    The constitutional framework supports this calculation. Should Sakaja face impeachment, resignation, or other forms of removal from office, Muchiri would automatically assume the governorship—a scenario that seems increasingly plausible as controversies mount.

    The Public’s Verdict

    On Nairobi’s streets, the verdict on Sakaja’s leadership is increasingly harsh. Residents who once bought into his “Make Nairobi Work” campaign slogan now speak of broken promises and failed systems.

    “Nothing works in this city,” says Mary Wanjiku, a small business owner in Eastlands. “Every time there’s a problem, they come with cameras and promises, but nothing changes. We’re tired of the lies.”

    This growing public disillusionment creates fertile ground for political change—a reality not lost on those watching from the wings.

    The Questions That Linger

    As Sakaja’s troubles multiply, several questions demand answers: Was the rate enforcement exercise a genuine attempt at revenue collection or a publicity stunt gone wrong? Why does the county repeatedly target entities they know are exempt from payments? And most intriguingly, what role does the deputy governor’s office play in these unfolding dramas?

    The governor’s office declined to respond to requests for comment, leaving these questions hanging in Nairobi’s political atmosphere like smoke from another Gikomba market fire.

    What Comes Next

    With general elections still years away, the immediate pressure on Sakaja comes from civil society groups, legal challenges, and mounting public dissatisfaction. The Justice for Ojwang controversy has energized human rights organizations, while the legal cases threaten to tie up the county government in prolonged court battles.

    For Muchiri, the strategy appears clear: maintain distance from the controversies while positioning himself as a competent alternative. Whether this calculated patience pays off may depend on how many more “Inawork” moments Sakaja’s administration can survive.

    In the corridors of City Hall, the whispers grow louder with each passing scandal. The deputy governor’s office may indeed be celebrating—but in Nairobi’s political theater, the final act is yet to be written.

    The governor’s office and County Secretary Godfrey Akumali did not respond to requests for comment on these allegations.

  • MCAs Investigate City Hall’s Sh10 Billion ‘Money Heist’ Paid Fraudulently To Law Firms

    MCAs Investigate City Hall’s Sh10 Billion ‘Money Heist’ Paid Fraudulently To Law Firms

    Nairobi County Assembly launches comprehensive probe into questionable legal payments amid allegations of manufactured cases and inflated bills

    Nairobi Members of County Assembly have launched a damning investigation into what they describe as a systematic “money heist” involving fraudulent legal claims worth Sh10.7 billion paid to law firms under highly questionable circumstances.

    The explosive probe, spearheaded by the County Assembly’s Public Accounts Committee, has uncovered a web of financial impropriety involving manufactured court cases, inflated legal bills, and suspicious payments made without proper documentation or oversight.

    The Yellow Horse Inn Scandal

    At the heart of the investigation lies a bizarre 2014 case that epitomizes the alleged fraud. Nairobi County initially issued a demand notice to Yellow Horse Inn Limited for Sh5.3 million in land rates, treating the property as privately owned according to the county’s own records.

    However, in a shocking twist during court proceedings, City Hall completely changed its position, suddenly claiming ownership of the same land it had been demanding rates from.

    This dramatic reversal, MCAs argue, signals a deliberately manufactured dispute designed to benefit both county officials and private law firms.

    To defend this new stance, the county retained Momanyi and Associates Advocates, which promptly issued a staggering fee note of Sh80 million, later “reduced” to Sh34 million.

    Crucially, no contract, itemized invoice, internal legal memo, or formal correspondence has been provided to justify this enormous cost.

    “If the county can issue a demand for land rates to an individual only to later claim ownership of the same land, does that not signal a failure of due diligence?” questioned Ngara MCA Mwaura Chege, who chairs the Public Accounts Committee.

    Pattern of Suspicious Payments

    The investigation has revealed a disturbing pattern of questionable legal payments across multiple cases:

    Traffic Marshal Recruitment Case: When Nairobi County was sued over alleged corruption in recruiting traffic marshals, it engaged Gikunda Miriti and Company Advocates. The firm issued a bill of Sh100 million, later revised to Sh67 million, which was paid in June 2023 without adequate justification.

    Undocumented Sh30 Million Payment: Perhaps most alarmingly, the county made a Sh30 million payment to another law firm despite the complete absence of supporting documents, including no case file, legal opinion from the county’s legal department, or contract.

    The Ruaraka Fire Station Fiasco: Baba Dogo MCA Geoffrey Majiwa highlighted another troubling case where a parcel in Ruaraka earmarked for a fire station became embroiled in manufactured litigation. “A demand was issued, rates were paid, and the land was eventually sold. There’s now a private fire station on public land, and the county is in court trying to reclaim it,” he revealed.

    Scale of the Crisis

    The investigation has uncovered that 44 law firms pocketed Sh1.3 billion in legal fees from Nairobi City County in just one year between October 2022 and January 2024. The most recent requisitions in January 2024 alone totaled Sh136 million to 11 different law firms.

    Some of the major payments include:

    • Kwanga Mboya and Company Advocates: Sh125 million
    • Swanya and Company Advocates: Sh85 million
    • Makallah Theuri: Sh73 million
    • Gikunda Miriti and Company: Sh67 million
    • MMA Advocates: Sh57 million

    Currently, 11 law firms are demanding a total of Sh10.7 billion from the county government, prompting widespread public outcry and the current investigation.

    Systemic Failures and Lack of Oversight

    County Attorney Christine Ireri, who has been in office for less than a year, acknowledged the scale of the problem. “We found one advocate who had been promised Sh1 billion. That is not only shocking but unacceptable,” she revealed.

    The crisis stems partly from the county’s limited legal capacity. With only 24 lawyers including the county attorney to handle hundreds of active cases, the county has been forced to rely heavily on external law firms—a situation that has allegedly been systematically exploited.

    “Some of these payments were committed by a single individual without any oversight,” Ireri explained, highlighting the lack of proper checks and balances that allowed the fraud to flourish.

    The Cleanup Operation

    Governor Johnson Sakaja’s administration has established a taskforce to audit and review all pending legal bills. So far, the taskforce has reviewed 162 files totaling Sh7 billion in claims, with many expected to be significantly reduced or rejected entirely.

    The county has implemented new measures requiring all legal fees to adhere to the Advocates Remuneration Order and undergo internal review before payment. “No advocate is currently being paid without internal review,” Ireri emphasized.

    The administration also plans to hire an additional 20 lawyers to reduce reliance on external law firms and prevent future exploitation of the system.

    Resistance and Tensions

    The cleanup efforts have created tension between the county government and members of the legal fraternity. Some lawyers have reportedly expressed frustration over the new vetting process, arguing it undermines previous agreements.

    “Many of them expected to be paid the full amounts they negotiated with individual county officials. But we must prioritize transparency and fiscal responsibility,” Ireri stated.

    The Nairobi legal fees scandal reflects a broader crisis affecting county governments across Kenya. Auditor General Nancy Gathungu has previously raised concerns about the huge pending legal bills crisis, noting that in some cases, legal fees exceed counties’ own revenue collections.

    The investigation has also raised serious questions about governance, accountability, and the vulnerability of public resources to systematic exploitation through manufactured legal disputes.

    As the Public Accounts Committee continues its investigation, MCAs are calling for comprehensive reforms to prevent similar scandals in the future. The probe is expected to result in recommendations for stronger oversight mechanisms, clearer procurement procedures for legal services, and potential criminal referrals for those found to have defrauded the county.

    “We need to build a system that protects public resources, holds people accountable, and ensures legal representation is based on merit and not personal deals,” Ireri concluded.

     

  • Inside Nairobi Protests Chaos: Goons Were Paid Sh2,000 and Promised Police Protection

    Inside Nairobi Protests Chaos: Goons Were Paid Sh2,000 and Promised Police Protection

    An investigation reveals the systematic recruitment and deployment of armed gangs to disrupt demonstrations following the death of blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody

    The chaos that engulfed Nairobi’s Central Business District during Tuesday’s protests was not spontaneous but the result of a carefully orchestrated plan involving paid goons, political coordination, and alleged police complicity that began unfolding as early as Thursday, June 13, 2025.

    An investigation by this publication has uncovered disturbing details of how hundreds of young men were recruited from informal settlements, armed with crude weapons, and deployed to disrupt demonstrations protesting the death of Albert Ojwang, a 31-year-old teacher and blogger who died in police custody.

    The Recruitment Network

    Goons armed with rungus roaming Nairobi streets during clash with protesters.
    Goons armed with rungus roaming Nairobi streets during clash with protesters.

    The operation centered on a systematic recruitment drive targeting youth from specific areas including Congo in Dagoretti North, Dagoretti South, and Mathare.

    Local coordinators and estate chairpersons, often serving as political mobilizers, were tasked with assembling teams of what sources describe as “goons” to counter the planned protests.

    “I was called on Monday evening and told there was a job if I was interested. I did not hesitate as I needed the money. I was promised Sh2,000 and told that the police had been briefed, so they wouldn’t harm us,” revealed one recruited individual from Kawangware in Dagoretti North who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    The recruited youth were instructed to carry whips, clubs, and other crude weapons, with a clear directive: deal ruthlessly with the protesters. Boda boda riders who accepted the assignment were specifically told to carry two armed passengers each.

    Assembly and Deployment

    Goons in mortorbikes roam the city as protesters march.
    Goons in mortorbikes roam the city as protesters march.

    On the morning of June 17, the recruited goons assembled at a busy petrol station on Valley Road, where they received their payment and had their motorcycle fuel tanks filled to capacity before heading to the CBD.

    “In the morning, I saw tens of motorcycles at the petrol station. Each had its fuel tank filled to capacity. Those present received Sh2,000 before heading to town,” confirmed a fuel attendant at the station.

    As they rode toward the city center, witnesses reported seeing the riders and passengers waving whips while chanting, “Hatutakubali maandamano hii town! (We won’t allow protests in this town).”

    However, conflicting reports have emerged about the payment amounts.

    Amnesty International Executive Director Houghton Irungu has claimed that individuals who infiltrated and disrupted the peaceful justice for Ojwang protests on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, were paid a mere Ksh200, while other sources, including one of the goons under duress, stated they “were paid Sh1,000 to disrupt the planned protests.”

    Political Warnings and Threats

    Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja.
    Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja.

    In the days leading up to the protest, several political figures issued stern warnings to potential demonstrators.

    Nairobi Governor Johnson Sakaja, speaking during a church service attended by President William Ruto in Kakamega County, declared: “I want to tell youths in Nairobi, demonstrating for your rights is allowed, but we will not allow the destruction of property again. That will never happen again in Nairobi… So don’t try it, you’ll find me in town.”

    Korogocho MCA Absalom Odhiambo, also known as Matach, was captured on video urging Governor Sakaja to mobilize youth to work alongside police in managing protesters.

    “Governor Sakaja formed a youth group and paired them with police so anyone trying to cause chaos would be dealt with accordingly,” Odhiambo stated.

    Activist Calvince Okoth, known as Gaucho, had also warned demonstrators against protesting but later denied involvement, claiming he was out of the country during the protests.

    The Unholy Alliance

    Calvince Gaucho.
    Calvince Gaucho.

    What distinguished the hired goons from legitimate protesters was their apparent coordination with law enforcement.

    They walked beside officers, despite being visibly armed with pangas, clubs and whips.

    This collaboration was witnessed by numerous observers and captured in photographs showing armed civilians operating alongside uniformed police officers.

    Today’s protests took a sinister turn as police officers and hired thugs joined forces in plain sight.

    In a scene both brazen and unsettling, hired goons arrived on motorbikes, others armed with clubs and whips terrorizing innocent passers-by all under the approving gaze of security forces.

    Some goons were reportedly heard giving instructions to anti-riot officers, telling them when and where to deploy tear gas against protesters.

    When Plans Went Awry

    Protestors set a blaze a motorcycle allegedly belong to one of the hired goons.
    Protestors set a blaze a motorcycle allegedly belong to one of the hired goons.

    The hired operatives soon found themselves outmatched when they encountered determined protesters on Moi Avenue.

    Several goons were assaulted by demonstrators, and some of their motorcycles were set ablaze.

    One rider attempting to escape was cornered on Koinange Street and beaten by protesters who demanded to know who had hired them.

    “We didn’t know we were coming to fight the protesters. We were told we were guarding shops from looters,” claimed one of the hired individuals, suggesting that some participants were misled about their actual mission.

    Official Responses and Denials

    State House distanced itself from the chaos, with spokesperson Hussein Mohammed stating that “Matters related to public order, safety and law enforcement fall within the mandate of the police, under the Inspector-General, who operate independently in the execution of their duties.”

    Governor Sakaja later condemned the violence, stating: “We categorically dissociate ourselves from any gangs, militias, or politically sponsored groups that exploit demonstrations to engage in criminal activity.”

    However, witnesses reported seeing some goons near City Hall, apparently hailing the governor for allowing them to “secure the city.”

    Isaac Mwaura, Government Spokesperson.
    Isaac Mwaura, Government Spokesperson.

    Government Spokesperson Isaac Mwaura dismissed suggestions that the goons represented government interests, insisting that “all Kenyans have the constitutional right to express their political opinions.”

    Police spokesperson Michael Muchiri Nyaga denied any collaboration with goons, calling such suggestions “preposterous.” He warned that “Photos don’t disappear. Action will be taken” against those captured breaking the law.

    Law Society of Kenya President Faith Odhiambo condemned the violence as a sign of rising anarchy, denouncing what she called the “barbaric conduct” of militia-like groups working in coordination with police.

    “Those who came in motorbikes were in groups and were armed and were paid by some politicians and senior officials at City Hall to harm the protestors,” one of the riders told The Standard newspaper.

    The deployment of paid goons represents a troubling escalation in Kenya’s approach to managing civil demonstrations.

    President William Ruto condemned Ojwang’s death as “heartbreaking and unacceptable.” The EU, U.S., and U.K. have all called for a transparent investigation.

    Albert Ojwang'
    The late Albert Ojwang’

    Ojwang, 31, was a teacher and father whose “last known communication was a plea for bail,” after being arrested for allegedly defaming a senior police officer through his blog posts exposing police corruption.

    The truth, as confirmed by a postmortem, is that he was beaten to death.

    His death has sparked widespread outrage and calls for police accountability in a country where at least 60 people were killed last year during a crackdown by security forces on protests over contentious tax legislation, the youngest a 12-year-old boy who was shot in the back.

    Investigations Continue

    As investigations into the June 17 chaos continue, questions remain about the extent of political involvement in recruiting and deploying armed goons against peaceful protesters.

    The systematic nature of the recruitment, the specific payment amounts, and the apparent coordination with law enforcement suggest this was not an isolated incident but part of a broader strategy to suppress dissent.

    The events in Nairobi have drawn comparisons to similar tactics used across East Africa, where governments have increasingly turned to non-state actors to supplement official security forces in managing civil unrest.

    With more protests planned, including a mass demonstration scheduled for June 25, the revelations about paid goons and their alleged police protection have only intensified calls for accountability and reform in Kenya’s approach to handling civil demonstrations.

  • ASAL PS Harsama Facing Boot Over Corrupt Deals

    ASAL PS Harsama Facing Boot Over Corrupt Deals

    Government Sources Reveal Corruption Probe Behind Ruto’s Ministry Restructuring

    Principal Secretary accused of diverting relief food to cronies, inflating supplier costs

    Principal Secretary for Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASAL) Kello Harsama is reportedly on the verge of losing his position following allegations of massive corruption in relief food distribution, sources close to the presidency have revealed.

    The controversy has emerged as a key factor behind President William Ruto’s recent Executive Order No. 1 of 2025, which restructured government ministries and transferred the Special Programmes function from the East African Community, Arid and Semi-Arid Lands ministry to the Public Service ministry.

    Corruption Allegations Surface

    Harsama has denied claims of taking 80 per cent of relief food meant for Asal counties to Marsabit, saying the region is categorized under the 23 Asal counties.

    However, government insiders paint a different picture of systematic corruption within his department.

    Sources within the ministry allege that Harsama has been operating a sophisticated corruption scheme involving the allocation of relief food supplies meant for drought-stricken communities across Kenya’s 23 ASAL counties. The allegations center on:

    Inflated Procurement Costs: Suppliers are reportedly being forced to quote inflated prices for basic food items such as beans and rice, with the excess amounts allegedly flowing back as kickbacks to senior officials.

    Regional Favoritism: Intelligence reports suggest that over 80% of relief food contracts have been awarded to suppliers from Harsama’s home region, raising questions about fairness in the procurement process.

    Supplier Coercion: Contractors seeking government tenders are allegedly being forced to comply with the inflated pricing structure or risk losing lucrative government contracts entirely.

    Cabinet Secretary-PS Feud Intensifies

    The corruption allegations have reportedly created a rift between Cabinet Secretary Beatrice Askul and PS Harsama.

    Sources indicate that Askul uncovered evidence of the corrupt practices and has been pushing for accountability measures within the ministry.

    “The CS discovered irregularities in the relief food distribution system and has been at loggerheads with the PS over these issues,” a ministry source who requested anonymity told this publication.

    This internal conflict is said to have contributed to President Ruto’s decision to restructure the ministry through the recent executive order, effectively removing certain functions from the embattled department.

    Presidential Intervention Through Restructuring

    President Ruto’s Executive Order No. 1 of 2025 created seven new state departments including National Government Coordination; Science, Research and Innovation; Public Investments and Assets Management; and Special Programmes, among others.

    The timing of this restructuring, coming amid the corruption allegations, has raised questions about whether it represents a strategic move to address the crisis without publicly acknowledging the scandal.

    Political analysts suggest the restructuring provides the President with an opportunity to reassign personnel and functions while conducting a thorough investigation into the alleged corruption.

    Relief Food Distribution Under Scrutiny

    Kenya’s ASAL regions have been grappling with recurring droughts, making relief food distribution a critical government function. The 23 ASAL counties, which include Marsabit, Turkana, Mandera, Wajir, West Pokot, and Baringo, depend heavily on government intervention during drought periods.

    The corruption allegations come at a particularly sensitive time, as these regions continue to face food security challenges.

    Any diversion or manipulation of relief supplies could have devastating consequences for vulnerable communities already struggling with the effects of climate change.

    Political Implications for Broad-Based Government

    The scandal has potential implications for the broad-based government arrangement between President Ruto and ODM leader Raila Odinga.

    Political observers suggest that any major reshuffle resulting from the corruption probe could create opportunities for ODM to secure additional positions within the government structure.

    “The possibility of Raila Odinga’s ODM landing more plum positions in the broad-based government is growing,” noted one political analyst, referring to potential changes in the principal secretary positions across various ministries.

    Call for Transparency

    Good governance advocates are calling for a transparent investigation into the allegations and appropriate action against any officials found culpable.

    “Relief food is meant for the most vulnerable populations in our society. Any corruption in this sector is not just theft of public resources but a crime against humanity,” said a representative from Transparency International Kenya.

    What’s Next?

    As the government restructuring takes effect, all eyes will be on whether PS Harsama retains his position or becomes a casualty of the ongoing reorganization. The President’s office has yet to make any public statements regarding the specific allegations.

    The case represents a test of the current administration’s commitment to fighting corruption, particularly in sectors that directly impact the welfare of Kenya’s most vulnerable populations.

    This story will be updated as more information becomes available. The Office of the Principal Secretary for ASAL did not respond to requests for comment by the time of publication.

  • Human Rights Groups Accuse Safaricom of Illegal Data Sharing with Security Agencies

    Human Rights Groups Accuse Safaricom of Illegal Data Sharing with Security Agencies

    Telecom giant allegedly provided unfettered access to customer data without court orders, facilitating tracking and capture of suspects

    Kenya’s largest telecommunications company, Safaricom PLC, faces serious allegations of systematically violating customer privacy rights by providing security agencies with unrestricted access to sensitive customer data without proper legal authorization.

    In a scathing open letter addressed to CEO Peter Ndegwa, the Kenya Human Rights Commission (KHRC) and Muslims for Human Rights (MUHURI) have accused the telecom giant of engaging in “criminal and unconstitutional practices” that may have facilitated human rights violations by Kenyan security forces.

    Explosive Investigation Reveals Years of Alleged Misconduct

    The accusations stem from an investigation published on October 29, 2024, by journalists Namir Shabibi, Claire Lauterbach, and Kenya’s Daily Nation newspaper, which revealed what the rights groups describe as a pattern of illegal data sharing spanning several years.

    According to the investigation, Safaricom allegedly allowed security agencies “routine access to consumer data (including but not limited to call data records and other location data) without a court order, assisting in the tracking and capturing suspects.”

    This practice is particularly concerning given what the rights groups describe as Kenyan security forces’ “reputation for using unlawful tactics, including enforced disappearances, renditions, and extrajudicial killings of suspects.”

    Seven Damning Allegations

    The human rights organizations have outlined seven specific allegations against Safaricom:

    Data Manipulation and Evidence Tampering: The company allegedly handed over responsibility for extracting and handling court-ordered call data records (CDRs) to police officers attached to its Law Enforcement Liaison Office. This created a serious conflict of interest, giving accused security forces the opportunity to “handle the data and conceal evidence of state crime.”

    Falsified Records: Safaricom allegedly released CDRs it certified as authentic despite bearing “signs of manipulation and falsification” in cases involving suspected state-enforced disappearances.

    Obstruction of Justice: The company is accused of habitually declining to provide complete CDRs despite court orders, potentially frustrating the course of justice in investigations of state crimes.

    Unauthorized Surveillance: Security agencies allegedly received routine access to customer data without proper court authorization, enabling them to track and capture suspects.

    Data Retention Deception: Safaricom allegedly retained customer data it claimed had been deleted, including information that could aid in investigating state crimes.

    Surveillance Software Development: In partnership with Neural Technologies Limited, Safaricom allegedly developed software granting security agencies “virtually unfettered access to private consumer data.”

    Predictive Profiling: Police attached to Safaricom allegedly used specialized software to “predictively and preemptively profile Kenyan citizens,” constituting what rights groups call “invasive breaches of customers’ private data rights.”

    Constitutional and Legal Violations

    The rights groups argue these alleged practices make Safaricom potentially liable for violating multiple sections of Kenya’s Constitution, including provisions protecting privacy, dignity, freedom from torture, and access to justice.

    The company may also have violated the Data Protection Act of 2019, which establishes strict guidelines for handling personal data.

    Inadequate Response

    While Safaricom released a public statement on October 31, 2024, attempting to address the allegations, KHRC and MUHURI dismissed it as inadequate, saying the company “conveniently ignored to respond to key findings presented in the investigation.”

    The rights groups characterized Safaricom’s response as a “selective response to grave human rights violations,” failing to address the core allegations about unauthorized data sharing and potential complicity in human rights abuses.

    Demand for Accountability

    In their letter, KHRC and MUHURI demanded that Safaricom “address the substance of the allegations with haste and clarify what steps Safaricom PLC will take to ensure that its data is not used unlawfully, whether by Safaricom staff, Kenyan security forces, or any other third party.”

    The organizations gave Safaricom seven days to respond to their correspondence, setting a deadline that would put additional public pressure on Kenya’s telecommunications leader.

    Implications

    The allegations against Safaricom raise serious questions about corporate responsibility in protecting customer privacy and the role of private companies in potential human rights violations. If proven true, the claims suggest a systematic partnership between Kenya’s largest telecom provider and security agencies that may have facilitated serious human rights abuses.

    The case also highlights growing concerns about digital surveillance and data privacy in Kenya, where telecommunications companies hold vast amounts of personal data that could be misused by authorities.

     

    As Kenya continues to grapple with allegations of enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings by security forces, the Safaricom case represents a critical test of corporate accountability and the protection of digital rights.

    The telecommunications giant now faces mounting pressure to provide a comprehensive response to the allegations and implement stronger safeguards to protect customer data from unauthorized access.

    [pdf-embedder url=”https://cms.kenyainsights.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Open-letter-to-Safaricom-over-alleged-breaches-of-customers-data-privacy.pdf”]

    Safaricom PLC has not yet responded to the specific allegations outlined in the human rights groups’ letter.

  • How NCBA Software Engineer Opened Floodgates For Mobile Banking System Fraud

    How NCBA Software Engineer Opened Floodgates For Mobile Banking System Fraud

    Software developer exploited access to bank’s codebase, enabling unauthorized withdrawals in Rwanda

    A software contractor hired to upgrade NCBA Bank’s mobile banking platform has been detained on charges of defrauding the financial institution of Ksh 57.5 million through sophisticated system manipulation.

    Evans Harry Nandwa, a developer with Nairobi-based Ronford Digital Limited, was contracted on June 6, 2025, to conduct system maintenance and upgrade the mobile banking infrastructure for NCBA Bank’s Rwandan subsidiary.

    However, investigators allege that Nandwa exploited his privileged access to compromise the bank’s security systems.

    The fraud scheme

    According to court documents presented before Milimani Magistrate Benmark Ekhubi, Nandwa made unauthorized amendments to the bank’s codebase during what was supposed to be routine system maintenance.

    The fraudulent modifications involved logic alterations that enabled integration services allowing unauthorized withdrawals from the Rwandan banking system.

    The breach specifically targeted NCBA Bank Rwanda’s mobile banking platform, which operates through the MTN mobile network.

    The fraudulent modifications reportedly allowed 70 NCBA Bank customers in Rwanda to carry out 260 transactions, resulting in a total loss of USD 446,000 (approximately Ksh 57.5 million).

    The scope of the fraud became apparent when investigators discovered that the unauthorized transactions were facilitated by deliberate code changes that bypassed normal security protocols.

    This allowed customers to withdraw funds they were not entitled to access, creating substantial losses for the bank.

    Officers from the Banking Fraud Investigations Unit presented Nandwa before Milimani Magistrate Benmark Ekhubi, seeking a 10-day custodial period to complete investigations and forward the case to the Director of Public Prosecutions.

    The magistrate granted police five working days to hold the suspect as investigations proceed.

    The case highlights growing concerns about insider threats in Kenya’s banking sector, where contracted developers and IT professionals often have extensive access to critical financial systems.

    NCBA Bank has been particularly vulnerable to such incidents, with previous cases involving mobile banking fraud schemes totaling hundreds of millions of shillings.

    Companies involved

    Ronford Digital Limited describes itself as “a nimble and innovative technology house” that specializes in “the design, development, and deployment of state-of-the-art APIs and applications, meticulously crafted to meet the unique needs of our clients”.

    The company’s LinkedIn profile indicates it focuses on translating complex processes into intuitive applications for seamless transactions.

    NCBA Bank Rwanda operates as a subsidiary of the NCBA Group Plc, one of Kenya’s largest financial services providers with operations across East Africa.

    The bank is among the Kenyan-owned subsidiaries that launched operations in Rwanda, with total assets valued at RWF 30.23 billion (US$32.44 million) as of September 2019.

    Banking fraud concerns

    This incident adds to a troubling pattern of banking fraud cases involving NCBA Bank. In February 2023, eight young men were charged with stealing Sh449.6 million from NCBA Bank through the Fuliza mobile overdraft facility, highlighting vulnerabilities in mobile banking platforms.

    The current case is particularly concerning because it involves a trusted contractor who was given legitimate access to sensitive banking systems.

    This breach of trust underscores the need for enhanced vetting procedures and monitoring of third-party developers working on critical financial infrastructure.

    System security

    The fraud method employed in this case—altering system logic to enable unauthorized transactions—represents a sophisticated understanding of banking software architecture.

    The fact that the changes were implemented during what appeared to be legitimate maintenance work suggests that insider threats pose significant risks to financial institutions.

    The cross-border nature of the fraud, affecting customers in Rwanda while being orchestrated from Kenya, also highlights the challenges banks face in securing their regional operations and ensuring consistent security protocols across different jurisdictions.

    The Banking Fraud Investigations Unit continues to investigate the full extent of the fraud and whether other individuals or systems were compromised.

    The case will be forwarded to the Director of Public Prosecutions for further legal action.

    NCBA Bank has not yet issued a public statement regarding the incident or outlined steps being taken to prevent similar breaches.

    The bank’s customers in Rwanda have likely been notified of the security breach and any necessary account protections.

    This case serves as a stark reminder of the evolving nature of financial crimes and the critical importance of robust cybersecurity measures in an increasingly digital banking environment.

    As banks continue to expand their digital offerings and rely on third-party contractors for system maintenance, the need for comprehensive security protocols and continuous monitoring becomes ever more crucial.

  • Former PS Warns of Hidden Hand Behind Mwaura’s Sh1.6B HF Group Acquisition, Predicts Delisting

    Former PS Warns of Hidden Hand Behind Mwaura’s Sh1.6B HF Group Acquisition, Predicts Delisting

    A former Permanent Secretary has raised serious concerns about the recent acquisition of a Sh1.6 billion stake in HF Group by former Kenya Revenue Authority (KRA) chairman Anthony Mwaura and his family, suggesting a senior politician may be the real power behind the controversial transaction.

    Irungu Nyakera, a former Permanent Secretary, took to social media to warn Kenyans that the high-profile investment may not be what it appears on the surface. In a pointed post, Nyakera claimed that “Anthony Mwaura is not the buyer” and warned existing shareholders to consider selling their stakes before an anticipated delisting.

    “If you own HF shares, buy more as the buyer will be making a full acquisition and delisting HF in not too long,” Nyakera cautioned, suggesting the transaction is part of a larger strategy to take the mortgage firm private.

    The warning comes amid growing public scrutiny over how the Mwaura family managed to raise such substantial funds for the investment.

    According to Business Daily reports, the family collectively purchased a 12.72 percent stake worth Sh1.6 billion through HF Group’s recent rights issue, making them the second-largest shareholder after Britam Holdings.

    The breakdown shows Mwaura acquired 81.6 million shares worth Sh548.3 million through his company Toddy Civil Engineering, while his wife Rose Njeri secured a 4.21 percent stake worth Sh533.5 million through Effort Merchants.

    Their daughter Susan Wanjiru obtained a 4.18 percent stake valued at Sh528 million under Janton Investments.

    Nyakera’s allegations have added a new dimension to the controversy, with the former PS suggesting that Kenyans are being presented with a false narrative about the transaction’s true ownership structure.

    Former PS Irungu Nyakera.
    Former PS Irungu Nyakera.

    His reference to someone “selling you a dynasty vs hustlers narrative” appears to allude to Kenya’s recent political discourse while warning of potential manipulation.

    The timing of the acquisition has raised eyebrows, coming just months after Mwaura was moved from his KRA chairmanship to head the Kenya Rural Roads Authority (KeRRA) in December 2024.

    His tenure at KRA was marked by controversy, including court proceedings related to a Sh357 million embezzlement case involving Nairobi County Government, though he was later acquitted.

    Public reaction has been swift and critical, with many Kenyans questioning the source of the family’s wealth on social media platforms.

    The fact that Mwaura’s daughter, who holds no known major business position, could afford a half-billion shilling investment has particularly sparked debate about transparency in public service.

    HF Group has been experiencing a remarkable turnaround, with its share price gaining 64.3 percent over the past six months to trade at Sh6.72 at the Nairobi Securities Exchange.

    The company doubled its earnings to Sh524 million in 2024, making it an attractive investment target.

    Despite the controversy, Mwaura has publicly stated that the investment represents a retirement plan and that he will not take an active role in HF Group’s management.

    “I don’t know much about banking,” he told Business Daily, emphasizing his hands-off approach.

    However, Nyakera’s warning about an impending full acquisition and delisting suggests the investment may be more strategic than initially presented.

    If accurate, current shareholders could face a buyout scenario that would remove HF Group from public trading.

    The Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission has faced calls to investigate the transaction’s funding sources, though no formal probe has been announced.

    As the debate continues, the controversy highlights growing public concern about wealth accumulation by former public officials and demands for greater transparency in Kenya’s corporate sector.

    The unfolding situation serves as a test case for corporate governance and public accountability, with stakeholders watching closely to see whether regulatory bodies will respond to the mounting concerns about this high-stakes financial transaction.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

  • Isiolo MCAs In Hiding After Impeachment Motion As Executive Found Abducted

    Isiolo MCAs In Hiding After Impeachment Motion As Executive Found Abducted

    ISIOLO COUNTY – A dangerous escalation in Isiolo County’s political crisis has forced 16 out of 18 Members of the County Assembly (MCAs) into hiding after they tabled an impeachment motion against Governor Abdi Ibrahim Hassan Guyo, with claims of intimidation, abduction, and threats to their lives now overshadowing the constitutional process.

    The political standoff took a sinister turn when a former county Chief Executive Committee member, Abdi Rahman, was allegedly abducted and found severely injured and abandoned in Ruiru, Nairobi County, sparking fears among the MCAs that their lives are in imminent danger.

    Climate of Fear and Intimidation

    The MCAs switched off their phones and retreated to an undisclosed location immediately after the impeachment motion was presented during a heavily guarded County Assembly session last Tuesday. Speaking to the media on Friday, the legislators painted a picture of a county gripped by political violence and intimidation.

    “We were trailed by armed individuals at 3 am until we reached our destination. One of our supporters was abducted, beaten and dumped in the bush. We shall not be intimidated from fulfilling our constitutional duty,” recounted Burat MCA Nicholas Lorot, describing their harrowing journey from Nakuru to Machakos as they fled to safety.

    Assembly Speaker Mohamed Roba pointed fingers at top county officials, accusing them of orchestrating the threats and harassment campaign against the MCAs.

    Abduction and Assault

    Abdirahman Mohamed, the immediate Isiolo County Chief Officer for Health who was abducted, has been found badly injured and abandoned in Ruai, Kiambu.
    Abdirahman Mohamed, the immediate Isiolo County Chief Officer for Health who was abducted, has been found badly injured and abandoned in Ruai, Kiambu.

    The gravity of the situation became apparent when the MCAs visited the hospitalized former county executive at a Nairobi health facility. The official was found abandoned approximately 20 kilometers from Ruai with multiple fractures after what appears to have been a brutal assault.

    “He was found some twenty kilometres away from Ruai. I think they threw him there thinking that he was dead. God is great; he is not dead. He had multiple fractures,” said one of the MCAs, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to security concerns.

    National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC) Chairperson Rehema Jaldessa condemned the incident in the strongest terms, describing it as “heinous goonism, intimidation, and abduction.”

    Serious Charges Against Governor

    The impeachment motion, moved by Garbatulla MCA Abubakar Godana, is supported by 15 documents including reports from the Auditor-General, County Assembly records, Hansards, budgetary documents, and video footage of the governor’s public addresses.

    Governor Guyo faces three main charges:

    Abuse of Office: The governor is accused of appointing 36 advisors and 31 chief officers despite Isiolo County receiving the third-lowest budget allocation nationally. This contradicts the Salaries and Remuneration Commission circular limiting advisors to four individuals and violates principles of prudent resource management under the Public Finance Management Act.

    Gross Misconduct: The motion cites the governor’s failure to implement County Assembly resolutions, resulting in ballooning county debt, an ineffective County Treasury, and massive loss of public funds. He is also accused of making “disrespectful, demeaning and sexist remarks” directed at Isiolo Senator Fatuma Dullo.

    Gross Violation of the Constitution: The governor stands accused of using divisive language that threatens peaceful coexistence among communities, violating the National Cohesion and Integration Act, and being largely absent from office while allegedly running county affairs from Nairobi.

    The impeachment motion comes amid an ongoing feud between Governor Guyo and Senator Fatuma Dullo, both elected on the Jubilee Party ticket in 2022. Senator Dullo recently alleged on the Senate floor that a meeting was held on October 30, 2024, where county government employees allegedly discussed plans for her assassination.

    “This conversation allegedly included plans for my assassination, posing a very real and serious threat to my life,” Senator Dullo told the Senate, adding that she has reported the threats to the Directorate of Criminal Investigation (DCI).

    Constitutional Process Under Threat

    Despite the intimidation, the County Assembly has pressed ahead with the constitutional process. Public participation forums are scheduled for Wednesday across all 10 wards, with the impeachment debate set for Friday. However, the climate of fear has raised questions about whether democracy can function under such circumstances.

    “This indicates the extent of criminality and poor leadership plaguing Isiolo. We condemn the rising political intolerance and call for sobriety among top leaders,” Speaker Roba said.

    While all 18 MCAs initially backed the impeachment motion, two are reported to have switched allegiance to Governor Guyo’s side, possibly under pressure.

    Local elders and a section of residents have appealed for mediation as an alternative to impeachment, blaming the escalating tensions on external forces. Samburu Council of Elders Chairperson Joyce Nairisiae and Secretary General of the Somali Council of Elders Idle Hassan have called for dialogue and a non-confrontational resolution.

    However, the MCAs remain resolute despite the dangers they face. Ngaremara MCA Peter Losu stated they would be cautious when traveling back for Friday’s debate but affirmed their commitment to their constitutional duties.

    “We have recorded statements with the police and hope action will be taken. Regardless, we will perform our duties as per the law without fear or intimidation,” he declared.

    https://youtu.be/jhZwt7vzvYM?si=TXSo1hyIRjfGjgTP

    The Isiolo crisis represents more than a local political dispute—it’s a test of Kenya’s devolved governance system and the rule of law. If elected officials can be intimidated, abducted, and assaulted for exercising their constitutional oversight role, it undermines the very foundation of democratic accountability.

    As the County Assembly prepares for public participation and the crucial Friday debate, all eyes will be on whether the constitutional process can proceed safely and fairly, or whether political violence will succeed in derailing democracy in Isiolo County.

    The outcome of this impeachment motion will likely set a precedent for how Kenya handles similar crises in its devolved government system, making it a case of national significance beyond the borders of Isiolo County.

  • M-Kopa Former Employee Reveals Embedded Racism in Company’s Share Structure

    M-Kopa Former Employee Reveals Embedded Racism in Company’s Share Structure

    Kenyan fintech giant faces constitutional challenge over allegedly discriminatory employee shareholding scheme that favored white staff while sidelining African workers

    A damning constitutional petition filed against M-Kopa Holdings has exposed what appears to be a systematic pattern of racial discrimination embedded within the company’s employee shareholding structure, raising serious questions about equity practices at one of Africa’s most celebrated fintech success stories.

    Elizabeth Njoki, a long-serving Kenyan employee who worked at M-Kopa from 2012 to 2023, has filed the petition at the Employment and Labour Relations Court, alleging that the British-headquartered company deliberately crafted a shareholding scheme that protected white employees and global investors while disadvantaging staff of African descent.

    The controversy centers on a 2019 board decision that fundamentally altered M-Kopa’s employee share ownership structure. According to court documents, the company created new classes of shares called “Growth Shares” that were predominantly allocated to expatriate and white employees, while African staff were reclassified as “Minor Holders” – a designation that stripped them of crucial shareholder rights including voting privileges, access to company information, and participation in shareholder meetings.

    The numbers tell a stark story. Of the first 48 recipients of Growth Shares, only seven were of African descent. In a subsequent round of share allocations, no Kenyan employee was included among the beneficiaries. The petition reveals that Growth Shares came with superior benefits including buyback rights, preferential pricing, and guaranteed exits at fair market value – privileges systematically denied to African employees.

    Protecting the powerful

    The share restructuring appears to have been triggered by concerns among major investors about potential dilution of their holdings. M-Kopa’s backers include high-profile names such as British International Investment (BII), a UK government-owned development finance institution, and Generation Investment Management, co-founded by former US Vice President Al Gore.

    When Treehouse Investments converted debt into new shares in early 2019, threatening to dilute existing preferred shareholders’ positions, the board allegedly designed what the petition describes as a “two-step anti-dilution plan” to protect major investors’ returns while tightening their control over the company.

    The results were dramatic. Between 2019 and 2022, Growth Shares ballooned from zero to over 3.3 million, while Preferred Shares grew from 3.4 million to 12.6 million. Despite this massive expansion, the preferred shareholders maintained their 73 percent ownership stake. The only losers were Ordinary Shareholders – mainly Kenyan staff – whose collective stake plummeted from 27 percent to just seven percent, reportedly without their knowledge or consent.

    Silencing dissent

    Perhaps most troubling are allegations about how the company responded to employee concerns. Njoki claims she was threatened with legal consequences and job repercussions when she sought clarification about her share options. Court documents include emails warning that seeking legal advice could result in her being classified as a “bad leaver” – a designation that would disqualify her from receiving any shares.

    The petition also alleges that the company engineered a “sham recapitalization” in 2021, artificially suppressing the company’s valuation through selective use of outdated benchmarks while rejecting more favorable comparisons with similar companies like Tala. This allegedly enabled further share reallocations that preserved investor control while locking in gains for Growth Shareholders.

    The case raises uncomfortable questions about the practices of so-called “impact investors” – including development finance institutions and sustainability-focused firms – who position themselves as forces for positive change in Africa while potentially perpetuating the very inequities they claim to address.

    M-Kopa has built its reputation on providing financial services to underserved African communities through innovative “pay-as-you-go” solar and mobile phone financing models. The company has been recognized by the Financial Times as one of Africa’s fastest-growing companies for four consecutive years and has become a dominant mobile phone distributor in Kenya.

    Yet the petition suggests that while the company profited from African markets and African talent, the benefits of that success were systematically channeled away from African employees toward white staff and international investors.

    M-Kopa Holdings has filed a preliminary objection seeking to strike out the petition, arguing that shareholder disputes should be heard in English and Welsh courts rather than Kenyan courts. The company’s legal team, through Anjarwalla & Khanna LLP, also contends there is no employment relationship between Njoki and M-Kopa Holdings, making the Employment and Labour Relations Court an inappropriate venue.

    The company has characterized the lawsuit as an abuse of court process, setting up what promises to be a significant legal battle over jurisdiction and the substantive allegations of racial discrimination.

    A test case for corporate Africa

    The M-Kopa case represents more than just a single company’s alleged misconduct. It serves as a test case for how corporate structures in Africa’s booming tech sector can perpetuate or challenge existing inequalities. As international investment continues to flow into African startups, questions about who truly benefits from this growth become increasingly urgent.

    For a company that has built its brand on financial inclusion and empowerment, the allegations paint a troubling picture of exclusion and exploitation at the very heart of its operations. Whether the courts will ultimately vindicate these claims remains to be seen, but the case has already sparked important conversations about equity, representation, and corporate responsibility in Africa’s rapidly evolving business landscape.

  • WATCH: New CCTV Footage Reveals Police Brought Ojwang to Hospital Already Dead

    WATCH: New CCTV Footage Reveals Police Brought Ojwang to Hospital Already Dead

    Disturbing CCTV footage and medical reports have exposed the full extent of police misconduct in the death of Albert Ojwang, a prominent Kenyan blogger and teacher, confirming he was already deceased when officers transported him to Mbagathi Hospital on June 8.

    CCTV footage from Mbagathi Hospital shows a police vehicle arriving at 1:35 a.m. on June 8, with officers displaying a shocking lack of urgency that contradicts their claims of rushing Ojwang for emergency medical treatment.

    The footage reveals officers leaving Ojwang unattended in the vehicle for extended periods while they made phone calls and engaged in casual conversation.

    The officers took 24 minutes from arrival before finally requesting assistance to load Ojwang onto a stretcher, spending an additional 10 minutes in the casualty section before wheeling out his body at 2:11 a.m.

    The police vehicle departed at 2:15 a.m., completing what medical staff have confirmed was merely a formality to register a death.

    A comprehensive medical report from Mbagathi Hospital has confirmed that Ojwang arrived at the facility already dead at 2:00 a.m., with injuries so severe that medical intervention was impossible.

    The report details extensive trauma that directly contradicts initial police claims of accidental injury.

    According to hospital staff, Ojwang’s face was notably swollen, and his limbs bore multiple severe bruises indicating a violent assault.

    Nurses reported that he was “oozing blood relentlessly from the back of his head, his mouth, and his eyes.”

    A distinct cut in the parieto-occipital region further reinforced evidence of brutal assault rather than self-inflicted harm.

    Medical personnel noted that the body showed signs of decay inconsistent with someone who had been alive shortly before arrival, suggesting Ojwang had been dead for some time before being transported to the hospital.

    The case has revealed systematic attempts to destroy evidence.

    A technician responsible for installing all 25 CCTV cameras at Central Police Station was arrested Friday after allegedly being coerced into deleting footage from June 6-7.

    According to sources, the technician was summoned to the station at 6:00 a.m. on June 8 and taken to a senior officer’s office where the digital video recorder was housed.

    The Independent Policing Oversight Authority (IPOA) had previously confirmed that the CCTV system at Central Police Station was tampered with just hours after Ojwang’s death, raising serious questions about evidence integrity and investigation transparency.

    Official Contradictions and Timeline Discrepancies
    While Police Inspector General Douglas Kanja claimed Ojwang was taken to the hospital at 1:39 a.m., hospital records mark his arrival at 2:00 a.m., and CCTV footage shows the police vehicle arriving at 1:35 a.m.

    These timing inconsistencies, combined with the medical evidence, paint a picture of coordinated deception.

    Initial police reports claimed Ojwang sustained fatal injuries after hitting his head against a cell wall at Central Police Station.

    However, the autopsy and hospital medical examination revealed trauma patterns consistent with assault, directly contradicting the official police narrative.

    National Outrage and Calls for Reform
    President William Ruto expressed shock at the revelations and ordered a “swift, transparent, and credible” investigation.

    “This tragic occurrence, at the hands of the police, is heartbreaking and unacceptable,” Ruto stated, while cautioning against actions that could compromise the investigative process.

    The Digital Content Creators Association of Kenya paid tribute to Ojwang, describing him as “a voice of the youth, a symbol of resilience, and an embodiment of the dreams and hopes of a generation that uses digital platforms to inspire change.”

    The association, along with human rights groups, has demanded immediate action against the officers involved and comprehensive police accountability reforms.

    Public demonstrations have erupted across Nairobi and other major cities, with businesses brought to a standstill on Thursday as protesters demanded justice. Chants of “Justice for Albert Ojwang” reflect growing frustration with police brutality and impunity in Kenya.